Lasmiditan (200 mg and 100 mg) Compared to Placebo for Acute Treatment of Migraine

Similar documents
Triptans: Nonresponse, Recurrence, and Serious AEs for Many Patients

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Migraine: Developing Drugs for Acute Treatment Guidance for Industry

Rimegepant Pivotal Phase 3 Trial Results - Conference Call March 26, Biohaven

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Despite the widespread use of triptans ... REPORTS... Almotriptan: A Review of Pharmacology, Clinical Efficacy, and Tolerability

What is new in the migraine world! Modar Khalil Consultant neurologist Hull Royal Infirmary

Advancing Innovative Therapies for Neurological Diseases

Guidance for Industry Migraine: Developing Drugs for Acute Treatment

Migraine much more than just a headache

Disclosure. Learning Objectives 11/10/2017. The Best and Most Interesting Research from Last Year Cephalalgia

Eletriptan vs sumatriptan: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple migraine attack study

Zolmitriptan is effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with migraine: a dose response study

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, parallel-group study.

Rizatriptan vs. ibuprofen in migraine: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Value of postmarketing surveillance studies in achieving a complete picture of antimigraine agents: using almotriptan as an example

Faculty Disclosures. Learning Objectives. Acute Treatment Strategies

...SELECTED ABSTRACTS...

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

Daniel Kassicieh, DO, FAAN

Disclosures. Triptans for Kids 5/16/13

ISSN doi: /head.13327

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Early treatment of a migraine attack while pain is still mild increases the efficacy of sumatriptan

ACUTE TREATMENT FOR MIGRAINE. Cristina Tassorelli

Does maxalt cause high blood pressure

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT Sponsor/company: Sanofi-Aventis. Date: 08/02/ 2008

Current Migraine Treatment Therapy. Daniel Kassicieh, DO, FAAN

CGRP, MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND SMALL MOLECULES (-GEPANTS)

Sponsor. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Generic Drug Name. Agomelatine Therapeutic Area of Trial. Major depressive disorder Approved Indication

New Zealand Data Sheet

Richard B. Lipton, 1 Joel Saper, 2 Messoud Ashina, 3 David Biondi, 4 Suman Bhattacharya, 4 Joe Hirman, 5 Barbara Schaeffler, 4 Roger Cady 4

Study No Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):

Zomig. Zomig / Zomig-ZMT (zolmitriptan) Description

Treatment satisfaction with zolmitriptan nasal spray for migraine in a real life setting: results from phase two of the REALIZE study

NARAMIG QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION

ADVERSE EVENTS OF NEW AEDS. LIONEL CARMANT, MD Professor of Neurosciences and Pediatrics

Migraine Management. Roger Cady, MD Headache Care Center Springfield, MO

Zomig. Zomig / Zomig-ZMT (zolmitriptan) Description

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Maxalt. Maxalt / Maxalt-MLT (rizatriptan) Description. Section: Prescription Drugs Effective Date: April 1, 2016

Clinical Trial Results Summary Study EN3409-BUP-305

Regulatory Status FDA approved indication: Migranal Nasal Spray is indicated for the acute treatment of migraine headaches with or without aura (1).

Galvus the most comprehensively studied DPP-4 inhibitor

BMS for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Dose-Ranging Trial

INDIVIDUAL STUDY TABLE REFERRING TO PART OF THE DOSSIER Volume: Page:

Treatment of Headache in the ED

Richard B Lipton 1, Brian Grosberg 1, Richard P Singer 2, Starr H Pearlman 3, James V Sorrentino 4, John N Quiring 5 and Joel R Saper 6.

Migranal Nasal Spray. Migranal Nasal Spray (dihydroergotamine) Description

Broad and clinically important benefits beyond the initial registrational endpoints are now reported.

M0BCore Safety Profile. Pharmaceutical form(s)/strength: ordispersible tablet SE/H/PSUR/0022/002 Date of FAR:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Summary ID#7029. Clinical Study Summary: Study F1D-MC-HGKQ

Intestinal, non-intestinal, and extra-digestive response to linaclotide in patients with IBS-C: results at Week 4 predict sustained response

SYNOPSIS 2/198 CSR_BDY-EFC5825-EN-E02. Name of company: TABULAR FORMAT (For National Authority Use only)

Transcutaneous stimulation of the cervical branch of the vagus nerve for cluster headache and migraine

Allergan Not Applicable AGN A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple Dose, Parallel

UMEC/VI vs. UMEC in subjects who responded to UMEC UMEC/VI vs. VI in subjects who responded to VI

Update on Diagnosis and Management of Migraines

PROMISE 2 Top-Line Data Results January 8, 2018

Is Topiramate Effective in Preventing Pediatric Migraines?

Results. Subject Disposition and Demographics Of 37 enrolled subjects, 23 (62.2%) completed the study

SUMAVEL DOSEPRO (sumatriptan succinate) solution for injection

Financial Support: This study was co-funded by OptiNose US, Inc., Yardley, PA, USA, and Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.

ONZETRA XSAIL (sumatriptan) nasal powder

Migraine strikes study: factors in patients decision to treat early

OCTOBER 7-10 PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

Sumatriptan Injection (Imitrex / Alsuma / Sumavel / Zembrace)

Migraine Diagnosis and Treatment: Results From the American Migraine Study II

Headache. Karen Thaxter

The RealiseAF registry:

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)

Study No: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Advances in the Treatment of Migraine

Supplementary Online Content

Sumatriptan Tablets, Nasal Spray (Imitrex), Nasal Powder (Onzetra Xsail), sumatriptan and naproxen sodium (Treximet tablets)

Promius Pharma, a subsidiary of Dr. Reddy s Laboratories, Princeton, NJ; 2 Vedanta Research, Chapel Hill, NC; 3

Alirocumab Treatment Effect Did Not Differ Between Patients With and Without Low HDL-C or High Triglyceride Levels in Phase 3 trials

Adult & Pediatric Patients. Stanford Health Care, Division Pain Medicine

Search for studies: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT

Core Safety Profile. Pharmaceutical form(s)/strength: Tablets and Oral lyophilisates (wafers) 5 and 10 mg NL/H/PSUR/0002/001 Date of FAR:

Supplementary Appendix

How do we treat migraine? New SIGN Guidelines

Study No.: LOV Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary-

BRL /RSD-101C0D/1/CPMS-704. Report Synopsis

Setting The setting of the study was primary care. The economic study was conducted in the USA.

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)

MIGRAINE A CAUSE OF INTENSE THROBBING; A MINI REVIEW

Perspectives on PFO Closure: Clinical Trials for Stroke Prevention and Migraines

Clinical Trials. Hans-Christoph Diener Senior Professor of Clinical Neuroscienes Medical Faculty University Duisburg-Essen Germany

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Ana Podgorac Belgrade, May 2012

Research Submission. ISSN doi: /head Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Headache 2013 American Headache Society

Evaluation of Systemic Effects of a Vaginal Estradiol Softgel Capsule Insert (TX-004HR) in Menopausal Women with Moderate to Severe Dyspareunia

Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended-Release Tablets M Clinical Study Report R&D/09/1109

Zolmitriptan nasal spray provides fast relief of migraine symptoms and is preferred by patients: a Swedish study of preference in clinical practice

Transcription:

(200 mg and 100 mg) Compared to for Acute Treatment of Migraine Bernice Kuca, M.S. 1 ; Linda A. Wietecha, B.S.N., M.S. 2 ; Paul H. Berg, M.S. 2 ; Sheena K. Aurora, M.D. 2 1 CoLucid Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company 2 Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN Diamond Headache Clinic Research & Educational Foundation (DHCREF) Headache Update 2017 July 13-16, 2017 Lake Buena Vista, FL Poster sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company and/or one of its subsidiaries.

Background Migraine is a disabling neurological disease 1 Approximately 36 million migraineurs in the United States (U.S.); 18% of women and 6% of men in the U.S. 1 Although treatment options are available, a large percentage of patients still have unmet treatment needs 1 Complicating the clinical picture is the association between migraine and cardiovascular (CV) events 2 is a novel serotonin (5HT-1F) agonist under development for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura penetrates the central nervous system selectively targets 5HT-1F receptors expressed in the trigeminal pathway (does not have vasoconstrictive activity unlike 5-HT [1B/1D] triptan agents 3 )

Figure 1. Study Design Migraine Attack Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score 11 Headache severity at least moderate and not improving History of migraine 1 year and 3-8 migraine attacks/month Migraine onset <50 years of age First Dose 4 hours of migraine onset 1:1:1 randomization 200 mg PO 100 mg PO Rescue 1 or Recurrence 2 Second Dose 2 to 24 hours after 1 st dose Abbreviations: PO=orally 200 mg PO 100 mg PO 2:1 randomization lasmiditan:placebo if first dose was lasmiditan If first dose was placebo, then second dose was placebo 1 Rescue: did not achieve headache pain-free status at 2 hours, completed the 2-hour assessments, and took a second dose of study drug between 2 and 24 hours post-first dose 2 Recurrence: achieved headache pain free status at 2 hours, but then experienced recurrence of mild, moderate, or severe migraine pain and took a second dose of study drug up to 24 hours from the first dose

Methods Primary Objectives: Efficacy of lasmiditan 200 mg compared to placebo at 2 hours on: Migraine headache pain Most bothersome symptom (MBS; nausea, phonophobia, or photophobia) Additional Objectives: 100 mg compared to placebo at 2 hours on migraine headache pain and MBS Time course and effect of lasmiditan 200 mg and 100 mg on headache pain relief and MBS Effect of a second dose of lasmiditan 200 mg and 100 mg compared to placebo on headache pain relief and MBS when used for rescue and for recurrence of migraine Safety and tolerability of lasmiditan 200 mg and 100 mg, as the first dose and as a second dose Efficacy Measures: Captured by electronic diary: International Headache Society 4-point headache severity rating scale: 0=none; 1=mild pain; 2=moderate; and 3=severe pain MBS (patient-centric): assessed as yes/no for presence of nausea, phonophobia, and photophobia Vomiting: assessed as yes/no Headache severity and MBS captured at timepoints: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 24, and 48 hours post-dose Safety Parameters: Adverse events (AEs), vital signs, clinical laboratory evaluations, and electrocardiograms Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were those reported as "different" from what was typically experienced with migraine; the subject was contacted in a follow-up phone call

Methods Statistical Analysis: Study populations: Safety Population: All randomized subjects who used 1 dose of study drug, regardless of whether or not they underwent any study assessments. Subjects were evaluated by the drug they used, not by the drug to which they were randomized Endpoints: adverse events and safety variables Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized subjects who used 1 dose of study drug and had any post-dose headache severity or symptom assessments. Subjects were evaluated by the drug to which they were randomized Endpoints: second dose for rescue or recurrence; headache pain relief Modified ITT (mitt) Population: All ITT subjects who treated a migraine attack within 4 hours of onset. Subjects were evaluated by the drug to which they were randomized Endpoints: Primary objectives: migraine headache pain and MBS freedom Comparisons were made via logistic regression with terms for treatment group and background migraine preventative use Odds ratio, with 95% confidence interval, for achieving response and p-value from Wald's test reported for each treatment group compared with placebo Tests of the primary and key secondary endpoints were conducted at a 1-sided significance level of 0.025; tests of all other endpoints were conducted at a 2-sided significance level of 0.05

RESULTS

Table 1. Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics Characteristic 200 mg n=609 100 mg n=630 n=617 ALL Subjects N=1856 Age (years), mean (SD) 41.4 (12.0) 42.2 (11.7) 42.4 (12.3) 42.0 (12.0) Female, n (%) 515 (84.6%) 512 (81.3%) 525 (85.1%) 1552 (83.6%) White, n (%) 450 (73.9%) 471 (74.8%) 479 (77.6%) 1400 (75.4%) History of migraine (years), mean (SD) 18.9 (13.1) 19.7 (13.0) 19.3 (12.7) 19.3 (12.9) Migraines/month, mean (SD) 5.3 (2.3) 5.1 (1.8) 5.1 (1.8) 5.1 (1.9) Migraines with aura, n (%) 195 (32.0%) 205 (32.5%) 194 (31.4%) 594 (32.0%) Migraine preventative medication use, n (%) Abbreviations: SD=standard deviation Past 3 months Overall mitt population (N=1545) averages: MIDAS Total score = 31.3 Days with headache in past 3 months = 17.5 Severity of headache pain = 7.5 (0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as it can be) 167 (27.4%) 158 (25.1%) 154 (25.0%) 479 (25.8%)

Table 2. Baseline Cardiovascular Risks Overall, 82.0% of subjects had migraine and 1 CV risk factors (in addition to migraine) Migraine headaches are a known risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) events and stroke 2 Variable, n (%) 200 mg n=609 100 mg n=630 n=617 ALL Subjects N=1856 Significant family history of CAD 202 (33.2%) 221 (35.1%) 201 (32.6%) 624 (33.6%) Postmenopausal women, n/n (%) 43/515 (8.3%) 54/512 (10.5%) 57/525 (10.9%) 154/1552 (9.9%) Former smoker, n/n (%) 107/575 (17.6%) 100/602 (15.9%) 98/591 (15.9%) 305/1768 (16.4%) Current smoker, n/n (%) 79/575 (13.0%) 90/602 (14.3%) 81/591 (13.1%) 250/1768 (13.5%) Hypertension 100 (16.4%) 100 (15.9%) 104 (16.9%) 304 (16.4%) Hyperlipidemia 46 (7.6%) 32 (5.1%) 36 (5.8%) 114 (6.1%) Hypercholesterolemia 21 (3.4%) 28 (4.4%) 28 (4.5%) 77 (4.1%) Type 2 diabetes 21 (3.4%) 19 (3.0%) 17 (2.8%) 57 (3.1%) Abbreviations: CAD=coronary artery disease Percentage reflects percentage of females only not full population

Table 3. Freedom From Headache Pain and Most Bothersome Symptom (mitt Population) First Dose: Primary endpoints were met Significantly more subjects treated with lasmiditan 200 mg were headache pain free and MBS free at 2 hours compared with placebo (p<.001) 100 mg also provided more freedom from headache pain and freedom from MBS at 2 hours compared with placebo (p<.001) Significantly more subjects experienced headache pain relief at 2 hours with lasmiditan 200 mg and 100 mg compared with placebo (p<.001) % of subjects pain free at 2 hours, odds ratio (95% CI) 200 mg (n=518) 32.2% 2.6 (2.0 3.6)* 100 mg (n=503) 28.2% 2.2 (1.6 3.0)* (n=524) 15.3% MBS recorded at time of dosing n=481 n=469 n=488 % of subjects MBS free at 2 hours, odds ratio (95% CI) 40.7% 1.6 (1.3 2.1)* 40.9% 1.7 (1.3 2.2)* 29.5% Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; MBS=most bothersome symptom; mitt=modified intent-to-treat Defined as a reduction in headache severity from mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3) at baseline to none (0) at the indicated assessment time MBS of nausea, phonophobia, or photophobia Defined as a reduction in headache severity from moderate (2) or severe (3) at baseline to mild (1) or none (0), or a reduction in headache severity from mild (1) at baseline to none (0), at the indicated assessment time * p<.001

Figure 2. Headache Pain Freedom First Dose (mitt Population)

Figure 3. Headache Pain Relief First Dose (ITT Population)

Table 4. Rescue - Second Dose Freedom From Headache Pain and Most Bothersome Symptom and Headache Pain Relief (ITT Population) Second Dose Rescue or Recurrence: 928 subjects used a second dose of study drug Rescue: The proportion of subjects who took a second dose for rescue were: 200 mg = 28.6% 100 mg = 35.0% = 57.8% Rescue Second Dose At 2 hours n, (%) 200 mg/ 200 mg (n=109) 200 mg/ (n=52) 100 mg/ 100 mg (n=139) 100 mg/ (n=62) (n=319) Headache pain free 29 (26.6%) 12 (23.1%) 40 (29.0%) 8 (12.9%) 54 (16.9%) MBS free 32 (33.7%) 16 (36.4%) 48 (40.3%) 10 (19.6%) 78 (28.0%) Headache pain relief 51 (46.8%) 25 (48.1%) 73 (52.9%) 26 (41.9%) 129 (40.4%) Abbreviations: MBS=most bothersome symptom Headache pain free is defined as a reduction in headache severity from mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3) at baseline to none (0) at the indicated assessment time MBS of self-described nausea, phonophobia, or photophobia Headache pain relief after second dose is defined as a reduction in headache severity from moderate (2) or severe (3) at second dose baseline to mild (1) or none (0), or a reduction in headache severity from mild (1) at baseline to none (0), at the indicated assessment time Recurrence: The proportions of subjects who took a second dose of study drug for recurrence of headache pain was low (3.1%) with no significant difference across the treatment groups

Table 5. Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events - First Dose (Safety Population) Incidence of 1 TEAEs and most frequently reported TEAEs were similar in subjects with 1 CV risk factors (in addition to migraine) following first dose of treatment TEAE, n (%) 200 mg (n=609) 100 mg (n=630) (n=617) Subjects with 1 TEAEs 257 (42.2%) 229 (36.3%) 99 (16.0%) Dizziness 99 (16.3%) 79 (12.5%) 21 (3.4%) Paresthesia 48 (7.9%) 36 (5.7%) 13 (2.1%) Somnolence 33 (5.4%) 36 (5.7%) 14 (2.3%) Fatigue 19 (3.1%) 26 (4.1%) 2 (0.3%) Nausea 32 (5.3%) 19 (3.0%) 12 (1.9%) Lethargy 15 (2.5%) 12 (1.9%) 2 (0.3%) Abbreviations: TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event TEAEs are events that occurred or worsened 0-48 hours after taking study drug, or an event that worsened or was different relative to the subject s usual symptoms of a migraine attack TEAEs that occurred 2% in any treatment group and occurred more often than in the placebo group

Table 6. Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events - Second Dose (Safety Population) TEAE, n (%) L200 / L200 (n=159) L200 / PBO (n=79) L100 / L100 (n=203) L100 / PBO (n=86) PBO / PBO (n=401) Subjects with 1 TEAEs 26 (16.4%) 22 (27.8%) 38 (18.7%) 16 (18.6%) 44 (11.0%) Dizziness 12 (7.5%) 9 (11.4%) 5 (2.5%) 7 (8.1%) 6 (1.5%) Somnolence 1 (0.6%) 1 (1.3%) 7 (3.4%) 2 (2.3%) 3 (0.7%) Paresthesia 0 (0%) 1 (1.3%) 3 (1.5%) 2 (2.3%) 6 (1.5%) Fatigue 2 (1.3%) 1 (1.3%) 5 (2.5%) 1 (1.2%) 2 (0.5%) Nausea 1 (0.6%) 2 (2.5%) 3 (1.5%) 1 (1.2%) 3 (0.7%) Abbreviations: L100=lasmiditan 100 mg; L200=lasmiditan 200 mg; PBO=placebo; TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event TEAEs are events that occurred or worsened 0-48 hours after taking study drug, or an event that worsened or was different relative to the subject s usual symptoms of a migraine attack TEAEs that occurred 2% in any treatment group and occurred more often than in the placebo group

Table 7. Treatment-Emergent Cardiovascular Adverse Events First Dose (Safety Population) Incidences of CV TEAEs were similar in subjects with 1 CV risk factors (in addition to migraine) following first dose of treatment Cardiovascular TEAE 200 mg (n=609) 100 mg (n=630) (n=617) Cardiac disorders, n (%) 5 (0.8%) 4 (0.6%) 2 (0.3%) Palpitations 4 (0.7%) 2 (0.3%) 0 Bradycardia 0 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%) LV hypertrophy 0 0 1 (0.2%) Sinus bradycardia 1 (0.2%) 0 0 Tachycardia 0 1 (0.2%) 0 Abbreviations: LV=left ventricular; TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event All cardiovascular TEAEs were coded as mild or moderate 3 (0.5%) reasonably or possibly related All reasonably or possibly related Following second dose of treatment, only palpitations (n=1) and tachycardia (n=1) were reported in the lasmiditan 100 mg/100 mg and 100 mg/placebo groups, respectively

Conclusions Significantly more subjects dosed with lasmiditan experienced freedom from headache pain and experienced headache pain relief at 2 hours than those dosed with placebo significant differences between lasmiditan and placebo emerged as early as 1 hour Significantly more subjects dosed with lasmiditan reported relief from their self-described most bothersome migraine attack symptom at 2 hours than those receiving placebo Subject population was reflective of severe disability associated with migraine and many had at least one CV risk factor (in addition to migraine) was well tolerated both on the first and second dose in overall population

References 1. Lipton RB, et al. Headache. 2015;55 Suppl 2:103-122. 2. Bigal ME, et al. Neurology. 2010;74:628-635. 3. Nilsson T, et al. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;372:49-56.

Disclosures Prior Presentation: These data were presented at the 5th European Headache and Migraine Trust International Congress (EHMTIC 2016), Glasgow, Scotland, 15-18 September 2016 Funding/Support: This research study was funded and conducted by CoLucid Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company Medical Writing and Editorial Assistance: Millie Hollandbeck and Courtneay Parsons, Synchrogenix Bernice Kuca, M.S.: bkuca@colucid.com A full-time employee of CoLucid Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company Linda A. Wietecha, B.S.N., M.S.: wietecha_linda_a@lilly.com A full-time employee of Eli Lilly and Company Paul H. Berg, M.S.: berg_paul@lilly.com A full-time employee of Eli Lilly and Company Sheena K. Aurora, M.D.: sheena.aurora@lilly.com A full-time employee of Eli Lilly and Company