Mortality. p =

Similar documents
Effect estimates [95% CI] BOC+PegIFN/RBV vs. PegIFN/RBV

from 29 March 2012 Effect estimates [95% CI] Telaprevir + PegIFN/RBV vs. PegIFN/RBV

from 21 June 2012 Mortality Overall mortality 1.6% vs. 0% Morbidity Absolute change in degree of spasticity (NRS score) [-1.29; -0.

Intervention empagliflozin + metformin N = 765 patients with events n (%)

Ponatinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) 2

from 20 February 2014

From 19 February 2015

Aclidinium bromide/formoterol Endpoint category. RR Endpoint. [95% CI 2 ] Study. with event

d) Patients with moderately to severely active Crohn s disease who have had an inadequate response with, lost

Number of treatments per patient. Designation of therapy Strength Dose/day Number/amount per pack 1

ongoing Insulin degludec/liraglutid 1 daily ongoing x daily

1 x weekly 50 mg. Consumption:

Deaths Patients with events (%) 0 vs. 0 n.r.

PRASUGREL HYDROCHLORIDE (Effient Eli Lilly Canada Inc.) Indication: Acute Coronary Syndrome

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 23 July 2014 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta317

Putting NICE guidance into practice

Belinda Green, Cardiologist, SDHB, 2016

Why and How Should We Switch Clopidogrel to Prasugrel?

Oral Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with ACS: A Focus on Prasugrel and Ticagrelor

OUTPATIENT ANTITHROMBOTIC MANAGEMENT POST NON-ST ELEVATION ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. TARGET AUDIENCE: All Canadian health care professionals.

Summary of risk management plan for Prasugrel Mylan (prasugrel)

Low Dose Rivaroxaban Versus Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 Inhibition, in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1)

Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor in ACS/PCI Which one to choose? V. Voudris MD FESC FACC 2 nd Cardiology Division Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center

Διάρκεια διπλής αντιαιμοπεταλιακής αγωγής. Νικόλαος Γ.Πατσουράκος Καρδιολόγος, Επιμελητής Α ΕΣΥ Τζάνειο Γενικό Νοσοκομείο Πειραιά

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 14 December 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta420

Stephan Windecker Department of Cardiology Swiss Cardiovascular Center and Clinical Trials Unit Bern Bern University Hospital, Switzerland

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 26 October 2011 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta236

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Made Practical

NHS Dumfries & Galloway Aspirin Discontinuation Audit May 2011 (updated August 2015)

Bayer s Rivaroxaban Demonstrated Superior Protection Against Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism Compared with Aspirin in EINSTEIN CHOICE Study

Cangrelor: Is it the new CHAMPION for PCI? Robert Barcelona, PharmD, BCPS Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Cardiac Intensive Care Unit November 13, 2015

El equilibrio entre regulación-innovación en la fijación de precios y financiación de medicamentos OR The AMNOG Law

Sheffield guidelines for the use of antiplatelets in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease (October 2017)

- May Help Increase Appropriate Early Use in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients -

Session Objectives. Clopidogrel Resistance. Clopidogrel (Plavix )

Oral anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of ACS patients the cost of reducing death!

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Lecture fees: AstraZeneca, Ely Lilly, Merck.

North Wales Cardiac Network Guidelines on oral antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Proposed Health Technology Appraisal

Impact of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 SNPs on outcomes with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes: a PLATO genetic substudy

New Study Presented at American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions 2016:

Controversies in Cardiac Pharmacology

ticagrelor 60mg film-coated tablets (Brilique ) SMC No. (1224/17) AstraZeneca UK Ltd

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

'Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndromes: perioperative strategies to improve outcome'

Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation

Quale terapia antiaggregante nello STEMI? Prasugrel vs ticagrelor

Supplementary Online Content

PCI in Patients with AF Optimizing Oral Anticoagulation Regimen

Antiplatelet Therapy in Primary CVD Prevention and Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Καρακώστας Γεώργιος Διευθυντής Καρδιολογικής Κλινικής, Γ.Ν.

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 21 July 2010

Supplement materials:

Which drug do you prefer for stable CAD? - P2Y12 inhibitor

2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Supplementary Table S1: Proportion of missing values presents in the original dataset

Benefit/Risk Assessment A Critical Need

2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

3/23/2017. Angelika Cyganska, PharmD Austin T. Wilson, MS, PharmD Candidate Europace Oct;14(10): Epub 2012 Aug 24.

Linagliptin Renewed benefit assessment according to 35a Paragraph 5b Social Code Book V 1

Angelika Cyganska, PharmD Austin T. Wilson, MS, PharmD Candidate 2017

The following is a transcript from a multimedia activity. Interactivity applies only when viewing the activity online.

Setting The setting was secondary care. The economic study was carried out in the UK.

Mid-term results from real-world REPARA registry. Felipe Hernandez, on behalf of the REPARA investigators

Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes

Ticagrelor vs prasugrel in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE

Early benefit assessment of new drugs 5-year experiences of AMNOG (from IQWiG s point of view)

Summary HTA. Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary artery bypass-grafting. HTA-Report Summary. Gorenoi V, Dintsios CM, Schönermark MP, Hagen A

תרופות מעכבות טסיות חדשות ד"ר אלי לב מנהל שרות הצנתורים ח השרון מרכז רפואי רבין

Otamixaban for non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

Platelet function testing to guide P2Y 12 -inhibitor treatment in ACS patients after PCI: insights from a national program in Hungary

Surveying the Landscape of Oral Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Management

When and how to combine antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant?

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 4 November 2009

FastTest. You ve read the book now test yourself

Balancing Efficacy and Safety of P2Y12 Inhibitors for ACS Patients

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

Antiplatelet and Anti-Thrombotic Therapy. Ivan Anderson, MD RIHVH Cardiology

Dr Αντώνιος Στ. Ντάτσιος MSc, MRCP(UK), FESC. Επεμβατικός Καρδιολόγος Επιμελητής Β Γ. Ν. Θ. Παπαγεωργίου

New insights in stent thrombosis: Platelet function monitoring. Franz-Josef Neumann Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen

Optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy for patients treated in STEMI network

Learning Objectives. Epidemiology of Acute Coronary Syndrome

UPDATES FROM THE 2018 ANTIPLATELET GUIDELINES

STEMI update. Vijay Krishnamoorthy M.D. Interventional Cardiology

Prasugrel: Son of Clopidogrel or Distant Cousin? Disclosures. Objectives

Clinical Policy Title: Cardiac rehabilitation

TRIAL UPDATE 1. ISAR TRIPLE SECURITY Trial. Dr Deven Patel Royal Free Hospital

Clopidogrel has been evaluated in clinical trials that included cardiovascular patients

CLINICAL INVESTIGATION OF ANTI-ANGINAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS IN STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS

Horizon Scanning Centre November 2012

Suffolk PCT Drug & Therapeutics Committee New Medicine Report (Adopted by the CCG until review and further notice)

ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

Unstable angina and NSTEMI

No conflict of interest to declare

Head-to-Head Study Showed Prasugrel Statistically Superior to Clopidogrel in Reducing Recurrent Cardiovascular Events

Durlaza. Durlaza (aspirin) Description

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

Transcription:

Resolution by the Federal Joint Committee on an amendment to the Pharmaceutical Directive (AM-RL): Appendix XII Resolutions on the benefit assessment of pharmaceuticals with new active ingredients, in accordance with the German Social Code, Book Five (SGB V), section 5a from 5 December 0 In its session on 5 December 0, the Federal Joint Committee resolved to amend the Pharmaceutical Directive (AM-RL), version published 8 December 008/ January 009 (Federal Gazette, number 49a of March 009), last amended on 0 October 0 (Federal Gazette, page 404), as follows: I. Appendix XII shall be amended to include the following in alphabetical order: Therapeutic indication: Brilique, co-administered with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), is indicated for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adult patients with acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina, non ST elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI] or ST elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI]); including patients managed medically, and those who are managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG).. Additional benefit of the pharmaceutical over appropriate comparator a) Unstable angina pectoris (UA)/non ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI): Appropriate comparator: clopidogrel Extent and probability of additional benefit over clopidogrel : proof of a significant additional benefit Study results according to endpoints : Mortality Effect estimates [95% CI] ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel Incident rate ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel/absolute risk reduction (ARR) Overall mortality HR 0.7 [0.60; 0.89].8% vs. 5.% ARR =.5% Cardiovascular mortality HR 0.70 [0.56; 0.87].% vs. 4.6% ARR =.5% p-value p = 0.00 p = 0.00

Morbidity Effect estimates [95% CI] ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel Incident rate ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel/absolute risk reduction (ARR) Myocardial infarction HR 0.78 [0.65; 0.94] 4.8% vs. 6.% ARR =.% p-value p = 0.008 Stroke HR.00 [0.70;.44].% vs..4% p = 0.994 Health-related quality of life Side effects No applicable data available. Severe bleeding incidents HR.07 [0.95;.0] % vs..% p = 0.74 Life-threatening or fatal bleeding incidents Dyspnea RR 0.55 [0.49; 0.6] Bradycardia RR 0.79 [0.65; 0.97] AE RR 0.95 [0.9; 0.97] SAE RR.0 [0.9;.09] Termination due to AE RR 0.7 [0.60; 0.8] HR.09 [0.9;.9] 6.6% vs. 6. % p = 0.89 4.0% vs. 7.7% ARR = 6.% 4.4% vs..5% ARR = 0.9% 7. % vs. 68.6% ARR =.7% p < 0.00 p = 0.0 p < 0.00 9.7% vs. 9.8% p = 0.88 8.% vs. 5.7% ARR =.5% p < 0.00 Data from the benefit assessment conducted by the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), page 5; myocardial infarction endpoint data from written hearing procedure Figures given only in cases with significant differences; negative ARR figures are in favour of clopidogrel Incident rate clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor, see notes in the IQWiG benefit assessment, page 6 b) ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), treated with pharmaceuticals: Appropriate comparator: clopidogrel Extent and probability of additional benefit over clopidogrel : no additional benefit proved c) ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), percutaneous coronary intervention: Appropriate comparator: prasugrel Extent and probability of additional benefit over prasugrel : no additional benefit proved Exceptions Patients 75 years old for whom treatment with prasugrel has been determined unsuitable following an individual benefitrisk assessment: a non-quantifiable additional benefit based on hints Patients with transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke in medical history: a non-quantifiable additional benefit based on hints d) ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) aortocoronary bypass operation: Appropriate comparator: mono with ASA Extent and probability of additional benefit over mono with ASA: no additional benefit proved. Number of patients and criteria for defining patients eligible for treatment a) Patients with unstable angina pectoris (UA)/patients with non ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) Number: 8,000 to,000 b) Patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), treated with pharmaceuticals: Number: 7,000 to,000 b) Patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and percutaneous coronary intervention: Number: 45,000 to 55,000 Number of patients 75 years old for whom treatment with prasugrel has been determined unsuitable following an individual benefit-risk assessment: 0 5% of patients with STEMI and percutaneous coronary intervention b) Patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and aortocoronary bypass operation: Number: 5,000 to 6,000. Requirements for quality-assured administration The specifications outlined in the product information are to be followed.

4. s of treatment "Lauer-Taxe", effective December 0 a) Unstable angina pectoris (UA)/non ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI): of : per treatment (days), daily, daily, daily, daily of treatment up to months Consumption: Strength (mg) Number of tablets per pack Average annual consumption (number of tablets) 00 mg 75 mg 00 mg 00 00 00 00 s: of pharmaceuticals: (pharmacy retail price ) after legally mandated rebates (Brilique) 69.46 47.57 paragraph :.05 Rebate in accordance with SGB V, section 0a, paragraph a: 9.84 (6%) 8.4 5.0 paragraph :.05 Rebate in accordance with SGB V, section 0a, paragraph :. (6%) ASA.8.07 paragraph : 0.7 (5%) paragraph b: 0.4 (0%) Lowest-cost generic s for additional, necessary statutory health insurance (SHI) benefits: 70 patient after the first month; then as medically recommended 09 9 b) ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), treated with pharmaceuticals: of :, daily, daily, daily, daily per treatment (days) 8 8 of treatment up to months, with clopidogrel up to 8 days based on the regulation in Appendix III, number a AM-RL

Consumption: Strength (mg) Number of tablets per pack Average annual consumption (number of tablets) 00 mg 75 mg 00 mg ; for clopidogrel: smallest pack s: of pharmaceuticals: 00 00 8 00 (pharmacy retail price ) after legally mandated rebates (Brilique) 69.46 47.57 paragraph :.05 Rebate in accordance with SGB V, section 0a, paragraph a: 9.84 (6%) 6..89 paragraph :.05 Rebate in accordance with SGB V, section 0a, paragraph : 0.9 (6%) ASA.8.07 paragraph : 0.7 (5%) paragraph b: 0.4 (0%) ; for clopidogrel: smallest pack Lowest-cost generic s for additional, necessary statutory health insurance (SHI) benefits: 70 8 patient after the first month; then as medically recommended 09 5 c) ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), percutaneous coronary intervention: of : Prasugrel of treatment up to months, daily, daily, daily, daily per treatment (days) Consumption: Strength (mg) Number of tablets per pack Average annual consumption (number of tablets) Prasugrel 00 mg 0 mg 5 mg 00 mg Maintenance dosage 0 mg Reduced maintenance dosage 5 mg 00 00 98 98 00 70

s: of pharmaceuticals: (pharmacy retail price ) after legally mandated rebates (Brilique) 69.46 47.57 paragraph :.05 Rebate in accordance with SGB V, section 0a, paragraph a: 9.84 (6%) Prasugrel (Efient) 86.5 49.86 paragraph :.05 Rebate in accordance with SGB V, section 0a, paragraph a: 4.4 (6%) ASA.8.07 paragraph : 0.7 (5%) paragraph b: 0.4 (0%) Price applies to 0 mg and 5 mg strengths s for additional, necessary statutory health insurance (SHI) benefits: patient after the first month; then as medically recommended 09 Prasugrel 94 d) ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) aortocoronary bypass operation: of :, daily, daily per treatment (days) Mono with ASA, daily of treatment up to months Consumption: Strength (mg) Number of tablets per pack Average annual consumption (number of tablets) 00 mg 00 00 Mono with ASA 00 mg 00 s: of pharmaceuticals: (pharmacy retail price ) after legally mandated rebates (Brilique) 69.46 47.57 paragraph :.05 Rebate in accordance with SGB V, section 0a, paragraph a: 9.84 (6%) ASA.8.07 paragraph : 0.7 (5%) paragraph b: 0.4 (0%) 70

s for additional, necessary statutory health insurance (SHI) benefits: patient after the first month; then as medically recommended 09 Mono with ASA II. This amendment takes effect on the day after its publication in the Federal Gazette. The justification for this resolution will be published on the website of the Federal Joint Committee at www.g-ba.de. Berlin, 5 December 0 The Federal Joint Committee, in accordance with SGB V, section 9 The Chair Hess