HEALTH OF WISCONSIN. Children and young adults (ages 1-24) B D REPORT CARD 2016

Similar documents
ANNUAL REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The full report is available at DECEMBER 2017

HEALTH OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN REPORT

Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Jurisdiction Licensure Reference Guide Topic: Retaking NPTE

Black Women s Access to Health Insurance

ADEA Survey of Dental School Seniors, 2015 Graduating Class Tables Report

RECOVERY SUPPORT SERVICES IN STATES

Women s Health Coverage: Stalled Progress

Financial Impact of Lung Cancer in West Virginia

Women s health status is one of the strongest determinants of how women use the health care system. The

Exhibit 1. Change in State Health System Performance by Indicator

Workforce Data The American Board of Pediatrics

African American Women and HIV/AIDS: Confronting the Crisis and Planning for Action

WHO CAN OR WILL BE THE POPULATION HEALTH INTEGRATOR?

Using Cancer Registry Data to Estimate the Percentage of Melanomas Attributable to UV Exposure

Improving Cancer Surveillance and Mortality Data for AI/AN Populations

County-Level Analysis of U.S. Licensed Psychologists and Health Indicators

Shu-Hong Zhu, PhD University of California, San Diego INTRODUCING THE ASIAN SMOKERS QUITLINE (ASQ)

SNAP Outreach within Food Banks: A View From The Ground

Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Jurisdiction Licensure Reference Guide Topic: Direct Access

BY-STATE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES AND EXPENDITURES IN MEDICAID, 1999

POLICY BRIEF. State Variability in Access to Hospital-Based Obstetric Services in Rural U.S. Counties. April rhrc.umn.edu. Purpose.

Overview of the HHS National Network of Quitlines Initiative

2016 COMMUNITY SURVEY

Alzheimer s Association Clinical Studies Initiative

Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT)/Patient Deliver Partner Therapy (PDPT)

Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Jurisdiction Licensure Reference Guide Topic: Foreign Educated Physical Therapists

RAISE Network Webinar Series. Asian Smokers Quitline (ASQ): Promoting Cessation in Our Communities. March 17, :00 pm 2:00 pm PT

Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Jurisdiction Licensure Reference Guide Topic: Direct Access

USA National Mental Healthcare Nonprofit Exempt Organization Financial Analysis as of December 14, 2015 January 24, 2016 ANSA-H2

CDC s National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP): 2010 Priorities and New Program Opportunities

The Affordable Care Act and HIV: What are the Implications?

Approach to Cancer Prevention through Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change in the U.S.

Millions of Americans face significant barriers

Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Jurisdiction Licensure Reference Guide Topic: Foreign Educated PTs and PTAs

AMERICAN IMMUNIZATION REGISTRY ASSOCIATION A L I S O N C H I, P R O G R A M D I R E C T O R

State Tobacco Control Programs

SASI Analysis of Funds Distributed in the United States By the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Pursuant to PS

AAll s well that ends well; still the fine s the crown; Whate er the course, the end is the renown. WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, All s Well That Ends Well

State of California Department of Justice. Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement

Overview and Findings from ASTHO s IIS Interstate Data Sharing Meeting

Changing the Course of Diabetes: Turning Hope into Reality

State Public Health Autism Resource Center (SPHARC)

Arkansas Prescription Monitoring Program

Introduction. All of the County Health Rankings are based upon this model of population health improvement:

The Changing Face of Heroin Use in the US: A Retrospective Analysis of the Past 50 Years 100 Heroin 90 Prescription opioids

Improving Access to Oral Health Care for Vulnerable and Underserved Populations

What is the Objective of the DQA in Developing Performance Measures. Robert Compton, DDS Executive Director

THREE BIG IMPACT ISSUES

2018 Perinatal Hepatitis B Summit. Eva Hansson, RN, MSN Perinatal Hepatitis B Prevention Coordinator

Introduction. All of the County Health Rankings are based upon this model of population health improvement:

Evidence-Based Policymaking: Investing in Programs that Work

Arkansas Prescription Monitoring Program

LaTanya Runnells, Ph.D Program Manager December 6, 2016

Radiation Therapy Staffing and Workplace Survey 2016

Dental ER Visits: Evidence of a Failed System. Shelly Gehshan AACDP Conference April 29, 2012

Introduction. Institute of Medicine, 2002

Medicaid Expansion & Adult Dental Benefits: Access to Dental Care among Low-Income Adults

A National and Statewide Perspective on the Opioid Crisis

PS : Comprehensive HIV Prevention Programs for Health Departments

MEDICAID FINANCING OF HPV VACCINE: Access for Low-Income Women

Neuropsychological Evaluations of Capacity STEVEN E. ROTHKE, PH.D., ABPP HAYLEY AMSBAUGH, M.S.

CMS Office of Minority Health: Working To Achieve Health Equity through Understanding, Solutions, and Action

Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Jurisdiction Licensure Reference Guide Topic: Direct Access

Social Host Liability: Preventing Underage Drinking Parties James F. Mosher, JD Alcohol Policy Consultations March 6, 2012

Improving Oral Health:

Strategies to Increase Hepatitis C Treatment Within ADAPs

Overview of the States Pesticide Registration Process AAPCO Laboratory Committee

The Right Hit. DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE MEDIA STRATEGY AT SYRINGE SERVICES PROGRAMS

Reducing Disparities in HIV and STDs: Tackling the Challenges in the Southern States and Puerto Rico

Introduction. All of the County Health Rankings are based upon this model of population health improvement:

Michael A. Preston, Ph.D., M.P.H. University of Arkansas for Medical

The indicators studied in this report are shaped by a broad range of factors, many of which are determined by

Mexico. April August 2009: first wave

Lewis & Clark National Estimation and Awareness Study

AMERICA S OPIOID EPIDEMIC AND ITS EFFECT ON THE NATION S COMMERCIALLY-INSURED POPULATION PUBLISHED JUNE 29, 2017

OREGON MEDICAL MARIJUANA PROGRAM STATISTICAL SNAPSHOT JANUARY, 2015 (REVISED 02/26/2015)

OREGON MEDICAL MARIJUANA PROGRAM STATISTICAL SNAPSHOT JULY, 2016 (REVISED 09/06/2016)

Marijuana and driving in the United States: prevalence, risks, and laws

Consensus and Collaboration

Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Jurisdiction Licensure Reference Guide Topic: License Renewal. License Renewal on Birthdays

Emerging Issues in Cancer Prevention and Control

How to Get Paid for Doing EBD

Christie Eheman, PhD NAACCR 6/2012

How Often Do Americans Eat Vegetarian Meals? And How Many Adults in the U.S. Are Vegetarian? Posted on May 29, 2015 by The VRG Blog Editor

Use of molecular surveillance data to identify clusters of recent and rapid HIV transmission

The Growing Health and Economic Burden of Older Adult Falls- Recent CDC Research

Integrated SCSN/Comprehensive Plans and How a Range of Integrated HIV Planning Activities Can Contribute

Maternal and Child Health Initiatives in Sickle Cell Disease

Voluntary Mental Health Treatment Laws for Minors & Length of Inpatient Stay. Tori Lallemont MPH Thesis: Maternal & Child Health June 6, 2007

Integrated HIV Statewide Coordinated Statement of Need (SCSN)/Comprehensive Plan Update

Who is paying pharmacists? Network inclusion Standard and simplified processes

Number of fatal work injuries,

a call to states: make alzheimer s a policy priority

The drug 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine

Report to Congressional Defense Committees

Authorities, Organization, & Key Issues Concerning Federal, State, & Local Public Health Laws

Program Overview. Karen L. Swartz, M.D. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

2003 National Immunization Survey Public-Use Data File

Director s Update Brief novel 2009-H1N1. Tuesday 21 JUL EDT Day 95. Week of: Explaining the burden of disease and aligning resources

Do Facts Matter? Shelly Gehshan Director, Pew Children s s Dental Campaign

Transcription:

HEALTH OF WISCONSIN Summary Grades Life stage Health grade Health disparity grade Infants (less than 1 year of age) C D Children and young adults (ages 1-24) B D Working-age adults (ages 25-64) B C Older adults (ages 65+) B- D All ages B- D REPORT CARD 2016 University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute Department of Population Health Sciences

Table of Contents Executive Summary...1 Report Card Overview...2 Wisconsin s Report Card for Infant Health...4 Wisconsin s Report Card for Child and Young Adult Health...6 Wisconsin s Report Card for Working-Age Adult Health...8 Wisconsin s Report Card for Older Adult Health... 10 Data Sources and Methods... 12 Funding for this report is provided by the UW School of Medicine and Public Health, Wisconsin Partnership Program. The report was designed by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Media Solutions. We gratefully acknowledge the input and feedback from the Population Health Institute s Advisory Board, Wisconsin Public Health Council, State Health Plan Committee, Wisconsin Department of Health Services, and University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute staff, including Bridget Catlin, Angela Rohan, Patrick Remington and David Kindig who contributed to the development of Report Card. Suggested citation: Hatchell K, Handrick L, Pollock EA and Timberlake K. Health of Wisconsin Report Card-2016. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, 2016.

Executive Summary December 2016 The Health of Wisconsin Report Card measures the state s progress towards meeting two overarching goals of the Healthiest Wisconsin 2020 State Health Plan: (1) to improve health for all and (2) to eliminate health disparities. As part of its mission to translate research for policy and practice, the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute has prepared the Health of Wisconsin Report Card, providing all Wisconsinites with a useful assessment of the state s health. The first Health of Wisconsin Report Card was released in 2007; updated versions were prepared in 2010 and 2013. Wisconsin s grade for overall health has remained the same since 2007 a B-. The health disparities grade has changed, however, from a C- in 2010, to a D in 2013 and 2016. This change indicates that Wisconsin needs to do more to reduce health disparities. As with the previous versions, the Health of Wisconsin Report Card 2016 draws attention to weaknesses in efforts across Wisconsin to promote the health of all residents. With the exception of working-age adults, Wisconsin s death rates have fallen for every age group examined in the report. However, death rates in other states also continue to improve. Thus, Wisconsin s improvement did not result in a higher grade, as our progress has not outpaced other states. Since 2013, progress in many areas may lead to reduced disparities in the future, including improvements in: Death rates among children living in rural counties Death rates for working-age and older adults with a level of education equal to high school or less Death rates for female older adults The number of unhealthy days for working-age adults with lower levels of educational attainment (equivalent to some college or technical school or less) and those of Asian or Hispanic/Latino race/ethnicity The number of unhealthy days for all older adults Despite these improvements in death rates and quality of life measures for Wisconsin, substantial gaps remain between the healthiest and least healthy subgroups in the state s population. These gaps result in an overall health disparity grade of D. Engaging Wisconsin communities, leaders and partners across sectors statewide will be necessary to reach the State Health Plan goals of improved health for all and the elimination of health disparities. 1

Report Card Overview The Wisconsin Partnership Program at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health strives to improve the overall health, health equity, and well-being of Wisconsin communities, supporting Wisconsin in becoming the healthiest state in the nation where all can live longer and better. To increase our understanding of the health of Wisconsin and, in particular, differences in health among subpopulations, we developed the Health of Wisconsin Report Card and continue to update it in order to draw attention to how Wisconsin s health compares to the nation as a whole. We examine current health outcomes and give grades assessing Wisconsin s overall health and health disparities. The image on the front cover gives two overall grades for the Health of Wisconsin: a B- for overall health and a D for health disparities. What do these grades represent and how were they determined? Grading Health We grade health in two ways: 1) length of life 2) quality of life We measure length of life by examining death rates for four distinct age groups: infants (less than 1 year old), children and young adults (ages 1-24), working-age adults (ages 25-64), and older adults (ages 65 and over). Researchers have found that asking people how healthy they feel provides valuable information about their quality of life, captures how healthy they feel right now and provides a good indication of their future well-being. National surveys collect information from people across the country regarding how many days in the past month they have felt physically or mentally unhealthy. Researchers then calculate the average number of unhealthy days per month for the overall population and subgroups of interest. We looked at unhealthy days to the two adult age groups (working-age adults and older adults). [Data is not available for infants or children and young adults.] When we grade the health (length and quality of life) of Wisconsin s population in comparison to the health of populations of other states, Wisconsin gets a B-. The overall health grade for Wisconsin represents the average of the health of the entire state population. It is important to note that because this grade is an average, the health of the majority of the population dominates the grade and may mask the failing health of several population subgroups. Grading Health Disparities In addition, we developed a health disparity grade based on the health of different groups of people compared to their peers of the same age in Wisconsin or in other states. To do this, we examined the health of subgroups of the population within each life stage based on four characteristics: Gender Geography Socioeconomic Status Race/Ethnicity Data on health by gender and geography are readily available, but data combining health and socioeconomic status, such as income, or health and race or ethnicity, are not always available or reliable. We chose education as our measure of socioeconomic status and reported on health for as many racial and ethnic subgroups as possible. For each life stage, we graded the health of each Wisconsin subgroup in comparison to the health of the population in that age group in other states. 2

To measure the disparity among subgroups within each life stage, we compared the health grade of each Wisconsin subgroup to the grade of the healthiest subgroup of the same age in Wisconsin. We used these comparisons to calculate disparity scores and grades for death and health-related quality of life. Taking account of the differences in health between subgroups, Wisconsin gets a D for health disparity. Summary Grades To give Wisconsin its two overall grades of B- and D, we averaged the health and health disparity grades for each of the four life stages (see table below). Detailed report cards for each of the four life stages appear on pages 4-11. We provide information on our data sources and methods on pages 12-13 and on our website: http://uwphi.pophealth.wisc.edu Life Stage Health Grade Health Disparity Grade Infants (less than 1 year of age) C D Children and young adults (ages 1-24) B D Working-age adults (ages 25-64) B C Older adults (ages 65+) B D All Ages B D Improving These Grades The goal of the Health of Wisconsin Report Card is to stimulate discussion about how the state can become healthier and reduce disparities across age groups. The Report Card is part of a series of reports published as part of the Making Wisconsin the Healthiest State project. Three other resources are also available on our website: http://uwphi.pophealth.wisc.edu/programs/match/healthiest-state/index.htm Opportunities to Make Wisconsin the Healthiest State - highlights the factors that determine our health: - Health Behaviors - Clinical Care - Social and Economic Factors - Physical Environment Wisconsin Health Trends: Progress Report presents statewide data on 10-year trends for leading health outcomes and factors in Wisconsin. What Works: Policies and Programs to Improve Wisconsin s Health, provides evidence ratings, literature reviews and implementation resources for nearly 400 policies and programs. This resource can help policy makers, and other leaders in the public and private sectors find ideas that can work locally. This online database is available at: www.whatworksforhealth.wisc.edu 3

Wisconsin s Report Card for Infant Health Death Rate Percent of Population Death Rate (Per 1000) Grades Infants (< 1 year) 100% 5.9 C Gender Education of mother Male 51% 6.1 C Female 49% 5.6 C High school or less 37% 7.5 D Some college/technical school 31% 5.8 C College graduate 33% 3.7 A Large Urban Metro (Milwaukee County) 23% 8.6 F Type of county Large Suburban Metro 15% 4.6 B Smaller Metro 37% 5.3 B Rural 26% 5.2 B African American 10% 13.8 F Asian 2% 6.5 C Race/ethnicity Hispanic/Latino 10% 4.8 B American Indian 1% 8.1 F White non-hispanic 76% 4.8 B Health Grade C Health Disparity Grade D 4

Infant Health (Less than 1 year of age) Wisconsin Infant Death Rates (Ages <1, rates per 1,000 population) Some college (5.8) Female (5.6) A B C D F Smaller Metro (5.3) Male (6.1) Rural (5.2) Asian (6.5) Hispanic/Latino (4.8) High school or less (7.5) White (4.8) Large Suburban Metro (4.6) College Grads (3.7) American Indian (8.1) Milwaukee County (8.6) African American (13.8) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Best state Massachusetts (4.2) Wisconsin (5.9) Worst state Mississippi (8.9) Overall, Wisconsin receives a grade of C for infant health and ranks 26 th nationally for its infant death rate. Wisconsin continues to fail in its efforts to promote health for infants who live in Milwaukee County and infants who are African American or American Indian. Wisconsin receives a barely passing grade of D for its efforts to promote the health of infants whose mothers have no education beyond high school. 5

Wisconsin s Report Card for Child and Young Adult Health Death Rate Percent of Population Death Rate (Per 100000) Grades Children and Young Adults (1-24) 100% 33.9 B Gender Male 51% 45.6 D Female 49% 21.7 A Large Urban Metro (Milwaukee County) 18% 40.4 C Type of county Large Suburban Metro 15% 36.4 C Smaller Metro 42% 27.9 B Rural 25% 38.1 C African American 1% 52.7 F Asian 4% 16.2 A Race/ethnicity Hispanic/Latino 10% 32.9 B American Indian 10% 64.8 F White non-hispanic 75% 32.0 B Health Grade B Health Disparity Grade D 6

Child and Young Adult Health (Ages 1 through 24) Wisconsin Child and Young Adult Death Rates (Ages 1-24, rates per 100,000 population) Large Suburban Metro (36.4) A B C D F Hispanic/Latino (32.9) Rural (38.1) Asian (16.2) Female (21.7) Smaller Metro (27.9) White (32.0) Milwaukee County (40.4) Male (45.6) African American (52.7) American Indian (64.8) 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 Best state Rhode Island (23.7) Wisconsin (33.9) Worst state Louisiana (53.8) Overall, Wisconsin receives a grade of B for child and young adult health and ranks 15 th nationally for its death rate. Wisconsin is failing in its efforts to promote health for children and young adults who are African American or American Indian. Wisconsin receives a barely passing grade of D for its efforts to promote health for male young adults. 7

Wisconsin s Report Card for Working-Age Adult Health Death Rate Percent of Population Death Rate (Per 100000) Grades Working-Age Adults (25-64) 100% 289 B Gender Education Type of county Race/ethnicity Male 50% 358 C Female 50% 219 A High school or less 37% 470 F Some college/technical school 34% 276 B College graduate 30% 206 A Large Urban Metro (Milwaukee County) 17% 398 D Large Suburban Metro 16% 233 A Smaller Metro 42% 267 B Rural 26% 296 B African American 6% 591 F Asian 2% 179 A Hispanic/Latino 5% 193 A American Indian 1% 604 F White non-hispanic 85% 275 B Unhealthy Days Percent of Population Unhealthy Days per Month Grades Working-Age Adults (25-64) 100% 6.4 B Gender Education Type of county Race/ethnicity Male 50% 5.8 A Female 50% 6.9 B High school or less 37% 7.9 C Some college/technical school 34% 6.6 B College graduate 30% 4.0 A Large Urban Metro (Milwaukee County) 17% 8.3 D Large Suburban Metro 16% 5.8 A Smaller Metro 42% 6.1 B Rural 26% 6.0 B African American 6% 10.0 F Asian 2% 4.1 A Hispanic/Latino 5% 8.6 D American Indian 1% 8.6 D White non-hispanic 85% 5.9 B 8 Health Grade B Health Disparity Grade C

Working-Age Adult Health (Ages 25 through 64) Wisconsin Working-Age Adult Death Rates (Ages 25-64, rates per 100,000 population) Rural (296) Some College (276) A B C D F White (275) Male (358) Smaller Metro (267) Large Suburban Metro (233) Female (219) Milwaukee County (398) High school or less (470) College Graduates (206) Hispanic/Latino (193) Asian (179) African American (591) American Indian (604) 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Best state Minnesota (245) Wisconsin (289) Worst state Mississippi (514) Overall, Wisconsin receives a grade of B for the health of working-age adults. Wisconsin ranks 13th nationally for its death rate and 22 nd for unhealthy days. Wisconsin receives a grade of C for health disparities among working-age adults. Wisconsin is failing in its efforts to reduce death among working-age adults who have high school level education or less, who are African American, or American Indian. Wisconsin is also failing in its efforts to improve health-related quality of life for working-age adults who are African American. Wisconsin receives a barely passing grade of D for its efforts to reduce death among workingage adults who live in Milwaukee County. Wisconsin also receives a barely passing grade of D for its efforts to improve health-related quality of life for working-age adults who live in Milwaukee County and for working-age adults who are Hispanic/Latino or American Indian. 9

Wisconsin s Report Card for Older Adult Health Death Rate Percent of Population Death Rate (Per 100000) Grades Older Adults (65+) 100% 4301 C Gender Education Type of county Race/ethnicity Male 44% 4969 F Female 56% 3817 B High school or less 57% 4502 C Some college/technical school 22% 4087 B College graduate 21% 4823 D Large Urban Metro (Milwaukee County) 13% 4561 D Large Suburban Metro 16% 4144 C Smaller Metro 39% 4250 C Rural 32% 4342 C African American 3% 5040 F Asian 1% 3108 A Hispanic/Latino 1% 2646 A American Indian 1% 6140 F White non-hispanic 94% 4296 C Unhealthy Days Percent of Population Unhealthy Days per Month Grades Older Adults (65+) 100% 6.1 B Gender Education Type of county Race/ethnicity Male 44% 5.4 A Female 56% 6.7 B High school or less 57% 6.9 C Some college/technical school 22% 6.0 B College graduate 21% 4.3 A Large Urban Metro (Milwaukee County) 13% 6.8 B Large Suburban Metro 16% 6.2 B Smaller Metro 39% 6.2 B Rural 32% 5.7 A African American 3% 8.0 D Asian 1% 8.6 D Hispanic/Latino 1% 7.5 C American Indian 1% 7.6 C White non-hispanic 94% 6.0 B 10 Health Grade B- Health Disparity Grade D

Older Adult Health (Ages 65+) Wisconsin Older Adult Death Rates (Ages 65+, rates per 100,000 population) Rural (4342) White (4296) A B C D F Smaller Metro (4250) High School or Less (4502) Large Suburban Metro (4144) Some College (4087) Milwaukee County (4561) College Graduates (4823) Female (3817) Male (4969) Asian (3108) African American (5040) Hispanic/Latino (2646) American Indian (6140) 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Best state Hawaii (3340) Wisconsin (4301) Worst state Mississippi (5133) Overall, Wisconsin receives a grade of B- for the health of older adults. Wisconsin ranks 24th nationally for older adult death rates and 17th for unhealthy days. Wisconsin receives a grade of D for health disparities among older adults. Wisconsin is failing in its efforts to reduce death for older adults who are male, American Indian or African American. Wisconsin receives a barely passing grade of D for its efforts to reduce death for older adults who are college graduates or living in Milwaukee County. Additionally, Wisconsin receives a barely passing grade of D for its efforts to promote health-related quality of life for older adults who are African American or Asian. 11

Data Sources and Methods What are death rates? Death rates are based on counts of the number of deaths occurring in a population group divided by the total number of people in that group. These numbers are then converted to reflect rates of death per 100,000 people (per 1,000 births for infants). We report rates based on the most recent 3-year period for which data are available nationally: 2012-2014. The death rates are adjusted for age (except the rates for infants and older adults by education). What are unhealthy days? Unhealthy days are a measure of health-related quality of life. We report the mean (average) number of unhealthy days reported per month. Numbers are based on adult (age 25+) respondents answers to two questions about their health in the past month: 1) how many days was your physical health poor? 2) how many days was your mental health poor? We report data for the most recent 3-year period for which data on unhealthy days are available nationally: 2012-2014. The mean number of unhealthy days per month is adjusted for age. Grading methods In order to give Wisconsin communities and population groups a snapshot of their health (death rates and unhealthy days) relative to their peers, we created grading scales. We looked at the distribution of health within each life stage for each of the 50 states to see how spread out each state s rate was from the average for the life stage (see figure below for an example for child and young adult death). We then assigned cutoff points for grades based on distance from the average (i.e., based on standard deviations from the mean). Number of U.S. States 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 A -1.5 SD Children and Young Adult Death Rates Across All 50 U.S. States B -0.5 SD UT PA NC DE FL TX C Average WI OH IN D +0.5 SD NH VA MD AZ LA MN VT NE ND AR MS CA OR NV MI TN WV AK HI WA IL KS MO WY OK MA NY NJ CO ID SC MO NM RI CT IA ME GA KY SD AL 27.1 34.7 42.4 50.1 Deaths among children and young adults (ages 1-24) per 100,000 population SD = standard deviation F +1.5 SD We determined a grading scale using this approach for each combination of outcome (death rates and unhealthy days) and life stage and assigned grades for each population subgroup. The exact cutoff points for grades for each outcome/life stage combination are provided on the next page. 12

Life Stage Population Sizes and Outcome-specific Cutoff Points for Grades Age Group Infants Children/Young Adults Working-Age Adults Older Adults 2014 Wisconsin Population (%) 66,637 (1.2%) 1,793,757 (31.2%) 3,013,149 (52.4%) 874,415 (15.2%) Outcome A B C D F Death <4.4 4.4-5.5 5.5-6.7 6.7-7.8 >7.8 Death <27.1 27.1-34.7 34.7-42.4 42.4-50.1 >50.1 Death <238 238-309 309-380 380-450 >450 Unhealthy Days <5.9 5.9-7.0 7.0-8.2 8.2-9.3 >9.3 Death <3738 3738-4143 4143-4548 4548-4952 >4952 Unhealthy Days <5.9 5.9-6.8 6.8-7.8 7.8-8.8 >8.8 To determine the health grade for the oldest two life stages, we averaged the outcome grades (death and unhealthy days), giving each outcome equal weight. The life stage health disparity grades are based on a weighted proportion of subgroup grades. Score values are assigned by comparing each subgroup grade to the best subgroup grade and are then converted to percentages. The resulting disparity score can range from a value of zero percent disparity when all subgroups have the same grade to 100% disparity where one subgroup grade is an A and all other subgroup grades are Fs. For the two younger life stages (infants and children and young adults), the disparity score is based solely on available death rates for subgroups. The disparity score for the two older life stages is based on an average of the scores for death rates and unhealthy days. We assigned grades to these scores as follows: A B C D F (0-15%) (15-30%) (30-45%) (45-60%) (>60%) Very Good Good Fair Poor Failing To determine Wisconsin s health grade, we averaged the four life stage health grades to calculate an overall GPA. We converted the overall GPA back to a grade using the following conversion: < 0.5 (F), 0.75-1.25 (D), 1.25-1.75 (C-), 1.75-2.25 (C), 2.25-2.75 (B-), 2.75-3.25 (B), 3.25-3.75 (A-), 3.75-4.0 (A). Wisconsin s health disparity grade was calculated in the same way, using the four life stage health disparity grades. Changes in overall grades since 2013 The overall health grade for the state of Wisconsin has remained a B- and the health disparity grade has remained a D indicating that Wisconsin needs to be doing more to reduce health disparities within the state. Data sources and references Indicator Data Source Years Death by Educational Level National Center for Health Statistics 2012-2014 Death for all Other Factors CDC WONDER 2012-2014 Population Counts and Proportions Wisconsin Interactive Statistics on Health 2014 Wisconsin Infants (<1) Subgroup Death Wisconsin Interactive Statistics on Health 2012-2014 Working and Older Adult Unhealthy Days Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2012-2014 13

Contact Information University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute Department of Population Health Sciences University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health 575 WARF Building 610 Walnut Street Madison, WI 53726 Phone: (608) 263-6294 Fax: (608) 262-6404 http://pophealth.wisc.edu/uwphi