When does enhanced monitoring for atrial fibrillation add value?

Similar documents
ARCA biopharma. Investment Community Webcast: Top-line Data from GENETIC-AF Phase 2B Clinical Trial

Targeting the late sodium channel: A new antiarrhythmic paradigm?

Population Screening for AF is not Worthwhile. Jonathan P. Piccini, MD, MHS, FHRS Associate Professor of Medicine

Implantable Cardiac Monitors for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Detection: Ready for Routine Use?

β 1 Adrenergic Receptor Polymorphism-Dependent Differences

The Relationship Between Daily Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Burden From Implantable Device Diagnostics and Stroke Risk: The TRENDS Study

Are Drugs Better? Dr Mauro Lencioni. Drugs or ablation as first line treatment for AF? Consultant Cardiologist & Electrophysiologist

Atrial Fibrillation: Rate vs. Rhythm. Michael Curley, MD Cardiac Electrophysiology

Subclinical AF: Implications of device based episodes

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients with Heart Failure

Catheter ABlation vs ANtiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation (CABANA) Trial

There are future perspectives in the pharmacological treatment of arrhythmias

Recent observations have focused attention on the PVs as a source of ectopic activity i determining i AF

Modifiable Up-Stream Risk Factors:

Thromboembolism During Sinus Rhythm in Patients with a History of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation and advanced age

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients with Heart Failure

Does AF Ablation Lower Stroke Risk? Hugh Calkins MD Professor of Medicine Director of Electrophysiology Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure

AF Ablation in 2015 Why, Who, What and How? Steve Wilton ACC Rockies, Banff March 10, 2015

Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure

Long-Term Outcome and Risks of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Post-ablation Management: Drug therapy, Anticoagulation and long-term Monitoring

Diagnosing atrial fibrillation using implantable devices

La terapia non anticoagulante nel paziente con FA secondo le Linee Guida F. CONROTTO

Stuart Beldner, MD, FHRS Assistant Professor NSLIJ Hofstra School of Med

Rate and Rhythm Control of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: in Whom and How

Does quality of life predict morbidity or mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)?

The 5 Most Important Things You Need to Know About Atrial Fibrillation. John D. Day, MD

Ablation Should Not Be Used as Primary Therapy for Treatment of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Geriatric Grand Rounds

Θα πρέπει να αναζηηείηαι η παροσζία ζιωπηλής κολπικής μαρμαρσγή ζε αζθενείς με κρσπηογενές εγκεθαλικό επειζόδιο; Ποιά είναι η καλύηερη μέθοδος;

FA et Apnée du Sommeil

SURGICAL ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION DURING MITRAL VALVE SURGERY THE CARDIOTHORACIC SURGICAL TRIALS NETWORK

Why to monitor AF ablation success?

AF detection: What s new? Christopher B. Granger

» A new drug s trial

Debate PRO. Dronedarone is an important drug in the management of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. John Camm

Outcomes of AF Ablation

Rebuttal. Jerónimo Farré MD 2010

Clinical and Economic Value of Rivaroxaban in Coronary Artery Disease

Continuous ECG telemonitoring with implantable devices: the expected clinical benefits

Device Diagnostics and Stroke Prevention: State of the Art

Biatrial Maze or PVI to Ablate Afib? Marc Gillinov, MD

Atrial Fibrillation and the NOAC s. John Raymond MS, PA-C, MHP February 10, 2018

Atrial Fibrillation: Catheter Ablation with New Technologies, Improving Quality of Life and Outcomes in Various Disease States

ESC Stockholm Arrhythmias & pacing

ANTICOAGULANTI Trattamento interventistico GIANLUCA BOTTO FESC, FEHRA, FAIAC UO ELETTROFISIOLOGIA

Samer Nasr, M.D. Mount Lebanon Hospital.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Recent Clinical Trials That Changed (or not) My Practice

Digoxin And Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Heart Failure: Does Serum Digoxin Concentration Matter?

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Patient Selection and Outcomes

Atrial fibrillation and mortality: where is the missing link? Isabelle C Van Gelder University Medical Center Groningen

Blocking the Late Sodium Current

Management of atrial fibrillation in heart failure

MANAGING ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: BEYOND ANTICOAGULATION December 9, 2017

Atrial fibrillation: why it's important to make opportunities diagnosis in single chamber ICD patients

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: REVISITING CONTROVERSIES IN AN ERA OF INNOVATION

Rate Control versus Rhythm Control in NSTEMI

HF and CRT: CRT-P versus CRT-D

Κατάλυση παροξυσμικής κολπικής μαρμαρυγής Ποια τεχνολογία και σε ποιους ασθενείς; Χάρης Κοσσυβάκης Καρδιολογικό Τμήμα Γ.Ν.Α. «Γ.

UTILITY OF THE IMPLANTABLE LOOP RECORDER

Long-Term Atrial Fibrillation Progression: What We Know in 2014

AF :RHYTHM CONTROL BY DR-MOHAMMED SALAH ASSISSTANT LECTURER CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT

Μηνύματα από τις σπουδαιότερες μελέτες στην ηλεκτροφυσιολογία το διάστημα

Newer Anti-Anginal Agents and Anticoagulants

ECG monitoring after ischemic stroke of TIA of unknown source with an insertable monitor? YES

Antiarrhythmic Drugs and Ablation in Patients with ICD and Shocks

Endpoints When Treating VT/VF in Patients with ICDs Programming Wojciech Zareba, MD, PhD

Contemporary Strategies for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation: a key determinant in the cardiovascular risk continuum. u Prof. Joseph S. Alpert u Arizona, USA

How Long Patietns Will Be on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy?

Recurrent Implantable Defibrillator Discharges (ICD) Discharges ICD Storm

Modern management of atrial fibrillation, from blood pressure control to anticoagulation

Seek and Ye Shall Find: Surprising Findings When Using the ILR-LINQ

Role of Ablation of AF and PVCs in the Management of Heart Failure

Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: Rate vs. Rhythm Control Time for Re-evaluation

Device detected AF and atrial high rate episodes

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation : where are we?

Managing Atrial Fibrillation in the Heart Failure Patient

AF#in#pa(ents#with#CAD# Is#dronedarone#a#good#choice?!

Prof. Fiorenzo Gaita

Should Gene+cs Influence Medica+on Use? Mona Fiuzat, PharmD, FACC Assistant Professor of Medicine Duke University Medical Center

Controversies in Atrial Fibrillation and HF

Modest Medtronic. Modest Boehringer Ingelheim

Devices and Other Non- Pharmacologic Therapy in CHF. Angel R. Leon, MD FACC Division of Cardiology Emory University School of Medicine

Fibrillazione atriale : causa diretta marker di rischio di eventi cerebrovascolari non solo embolici?

Atrial Fibrillation New Approaches, Techniques, and Technology

TAVR-Update Andrzej Boguszewski MD, FACC, FSCAI Vice Chairman, Cardiology Mid-Michigan Health Associate Professor Michigan State University, Central

Long Standing Persistent AF ; CPVI is enough for it

Events after discontinuation of randomized treatment at the end of the ARISTOTLE trial

Saudi Heart Association February 22, 2011

Indicatie voor ablatie bij voorkamerfibrillatie. Andrea Sarkozy Cardiologie Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen

Raphael Rosso MD, Yuval Levi Med. Eng., Sami Viskin MD Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Invasive and Medical Treatments for Atrial Fibrillation. Thomas J Dresing, MD Section of Electrophysiology and Pacing Cleveland Clinic

What s new with DOACs? Defining place in therapy for edoxaban &

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Minimally Invasive Stand Alone Cox-Maze Procedure For Patients With Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

A Cryo Anatomical Procedure to Everyone? Saverio Iacopino, FACC, FESC

Transcription:

When does enhanced monitoring for atrial fibrillation add value? Jonathan P. Piccini, MD, MHS, FHRS Associate Professor of Medicine Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center jonathan.piccini@duke.edu

Disclosures Research Grants AHRQ ARCA biopharma Boston Scientific German AFNet Gilead Johnson & Johnson ResMed St Jude Medical Consulting BMS/Pfizer GSK Johnson & Johnson Laguna Pharmaceuticals Medtronic Spectranetics Full disclosures available at https://www.dcri.org

SF-36 Score AF Adversely Affects QoL AF 120 Post MI 100 * * Controls 80 60 40 * 54 59 78 68 70 88 71 85 92 * 68 76 81 20 0 General Health Physical Function Social Function Mental Health Dorian P, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1303-1309. *P <.05 AF vs controls

Natural History of Atrial Fibrillation Death Stroke Heart Failure CV Hospitalization TIA

The importance of outcomes beyond stroke Death Heart Failure Piccini J P et al. Eur Heart J 2014;35:250-256

Rate of all-cause mortality Persistent AF is associated with worse survival 0.12 0.10 Persistent AF Paroxysmal AF Adjusted HR paroxysmal = 0.79 (0.67 0.94) p=0.0061 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 0 6 12 18 24 30 Months since randomization No. at Risk Persistent 11485 11255 10962 8113 4975 2134 Paroxysmal 2490 2451 2404 1830 1216 498 Steinberg, BS. Eur Heart J. 2014; In press.

AFB is associated increased risk of hospitalization in pacemaker patients: BRADYCARE Mittal S, et al. HRS Scientific Sessions. 2015

Pts <67 years HR 1.81 (95% CI 1.11-2.94) Independent of clinical stroke. Strongly associated with duration of exposure to AF de Bruijn RF. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:1288-94 Alznet.org

Effectiveness Endpoints in Trials of Surgical Interventions for AF Primary Endpoints Secondary Endpoints Electrocardiographically documented AT/AF 30 seconds Antiarrhythmic therapy Cardioversion Repeat surgical/catheter ablation AF burden Symptom scores Quality of life Exercise tolerance LVEF Atrial transport function Left atrial size CDRH. Clinical Study Designs for Surgical Ablation Devices for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation. February 15, 2013

Effectiveness Endpoints in Trials of Surgical Interventions for AF Primary Endpoints Secondary Endpoints Electrocardiographically documented AT/AF 30 seconds Antiarrhythmic therapy Cardioversion Repeat surgical/catheter ablation AF burden Symptom scores Quality of life Exercise tolerance LVEF Atrial transport function Left atrial size CDRH. Clinical Study Designs for Surgical Ablation Devices for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation. February 15, 2013

24-Hour Continuous ECG Monitoring before TAVR Marina Urena et al. Circulation. 2015;131:469-477

Cerebrovascular events within 30-days after TAVR Marina Urena et al. Circulation. 2015;131:469-477

Effect of ranolazine on AF in NSTEMI (MERLIN TIMI 36): continuous ECG during the first 7 days Scirica BM, et al. Europace 2015;17:32-37

Clinical AF events in patients treated with ranolazine or placebo Scirica BM, et al. Europace 2015;17:32-37

Median Percent Change from Baseline PASCAL: Importance of AF burden in clinical trials 20 10 0-10 -20 ITT Population, % Change in AFB from Baseline Wilcoxon rank sum test vs Placebo 11.2 p=0.07 p=0.013 p=0.0013 N=18-12.6 N=20-30 -40-50 -60-70 -80-54.4 N=18 Dose Response: p=<0.0001-74.2 Jonckheer-Terpstra test N=15 Placebo 200 mg bid 400 mg bid 600 mg bid Ezekowitz M et al; Abstract

Enhanced Late I Na Causes and/or contributes to EP Mechanisms of Arrhythmias Enhanced Late I na and Arrhythmogenesis EP Phenotype GS-6615 (eleclazine) GS967 Abnormal automaticity Late I Na [Na + ] i NCX [Ca 2+ ] i VT QTc EAD DADs Triggers Substrate Dispersion Endo APD Epi Belardinelli et al, Heart Rhythm 12: 440-448, 2015 Spatial Temporal Belardinelli et al, Heart Rhythm 12: 440-448, 2015 4

Changes in AF Burden Over 12 Weeks 70% Reduction in AFB Overall Changes in AFB Reiffel JA. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:1048-56.

CAT HF: Arrhythmia Substudy Design Overall CAT-HF Population R MV-triggered ASV Control Arm ~50 dual-chamber devices ~50 dual-chamber devices Arrhythmia Core Lab Adjudication 1 and 2 Events at 0, 3, 6 months

Probability of Event-Free Survival Probability of Event-Free Survival Genotype-Directed Therapy of AF in HF: Bucindolol b 1 389 Arg/Arg (n = 441; 36 events) b 1 389 Gly carriers (n = 484; 44 events) Interaction p = 0.008 Risk reduction 74% 1.00 1.00 No risk reduction 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70 Placebo Bucindolol Hazard Ratio = 0.26 (0.12 0.57) P-value = 0.0003 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 Months After Randomization 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70 Placebo Bucindolol Hazard Ratio = 1.01 (0.56 1.84) P-value = 0.969 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 Months After Randomization Aleong R. JACC Heart Fail. 2013;1:338-34

Genetically Targeted Therapy for the Prevention of Symptomatic AF in Patients With Heart Failure (GENETIC-AF) LVEF <0.50, Class II-III HF w/in 90 days No contra-indications to b-blockers b 1 389 Arg/Arg genotype n = 100 (310) Bucindolol Recent onset Sx AF, 1 wk 1 yr; Class I-III HF Toprol-XL n = 100 (310) Time 0 (chemical conversion to SR or ECV) ECV @ 3 wks if still in AF AF free/event: from 24 hrs after ECV 1 Endpoint = Recurrent AF or ACM at 24 weeks Co-Primary for Phase 2b = AF Burden ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01970501

Overaccessorize much?

Patch-Based Holter Monitoring Smart Phone-Based Event Monitoring

Monitoring Dofetilide Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy Chung EH. J Electrocardiol. 2015;48:8-9

Pill in Pocket Anticoagulation: react.com Slide courtesy of Rod Passman, Northwestern University.

Conclusions AF symptoms are the tip of the iceberg AF burden is an important biosignature Associated with a variety of important outcomes including stroke, hospitalization, and all-cause mortality AF burden can assist in trials, particularly in early clinical development

Summary Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation Safety first. Be aggressive with your ACT targets Bridging therapy is associated with a higher risk of bleeding complications Emerging theme >> Anticoagulation transitions carry more risk than continued anticoagulation Once a diagnosis of AF is made, stroke prophylaxis should be guided by risk stratification alone (and not rhythm)