ADAPT. Adjuvant Dynamic marker- Adjusted Personalized Therapy trial optimizing risk assessment and therapy response prediction in early breast cancer

Similar documents
Hofmann et al. Hofmann et al. Trials 2013, 14:261

ADAPT: Her 2+/ HR - S. Kümmel Brustzentrum Kliniken Essen-Mitte

UK Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Symposium. Should lobular phenotype be considered when deciding treatment? Michael J Kerin

Point of View on Early Triple Negative

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017

Neoadjuvant (Primary) Systemic Therapy

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (essentials in ER positive early breast cancer)

Assessment of Risk Recurrence: Adjuvant Online, OncotypeDx & Mammaprint

Lecture 5. Primary systemic therapy: clinical and biological endpoints

Sesiones interhospitalarias de cáncer de mama. Revisión bibliográfica 4º trimestre 2015

CARCINOMA DELLA MAMMELLA La scelta del trattamento adiuvante: utilità clinica dei tests genomici

Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant treatment for HER-2+ breast cancer

Contemporary Classification of Breast Cancer

The Neoadjuvant Model as a Translational Tool for Drug and Biomarker Development in Breast Cancer

8/8/2011. PONDERing the Need to TAILOR Adjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ Node Positive Breast Cancer. Overview

The Role of Pathologic Complete Response (pcr) as a Surrogate Marker for Outcomes in Breast Cancer: Where Are We Now?

Rationale For & Design of TAILORx. Joseph A. Sparano, MD Albert Einstein College of Medicine Montefiore-Einstein Cancer Center Bronx, New York

Open Clinical Trials: What s Out There Now Paula D. Ryan, MD, PhD

EARLY STAGE BREAST CANCER ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY. Dr. Carlos Garbino

Manejo do câncer de mama RH+ na adjuvância: o que há de novo?

Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy. Mike Dixon Clinical Director Breakthrough Research Unit Edinburgh

Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy. 10 Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy. Lesson 1

I SPY 2 TRIAL. How it Works April 9, 2013

38 years old, premenopausal, had L+snbx. Pathology: IDC Gr.II T-1.9cm N+2/4sn ER+100%st, PR+60%st, Her2-neg, KI %

The Oncotype DX Assay in the Contemporary Management of Invasive Early-stage Breast Cancer

The TAILORx Trial: A review of the data and implications for practice

PROGNOSTICO DE PACIENTES COM CA DE MAMA METASTATICO HER2+: PODEMOS FAZER MAIS? TDM-1 AND BEYOND!

Breast : ASCO Abstracts for Review

Gene Signatures in Breast Cancer: Moving Beyond ER, PR, and HER2? Lisa A. Carey, M.D. University of North Carolina USA

Targeted Agents In Breast Cancer. Wonderful Music With New Instruments

XII Michelangelo Foundation Seminar

4/13/2010. Silverman, Buchanan Breast, 2003

Evaluation of Pathologic Response in Breast Cancer Treated with Primary Systemic Therapy

Endocrine Therapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer

HER2-Targeted Rx. An Historical Perspective

2014 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Review

What is new in HR+ Breast Cancer? Olivia Pagani Breast Unit and Institute of oncology of Southern Switzerland

She counts on your breast cancer expertise at the most vulnerable time of her life.

Update on the Management of HER2+ Breast Cancer. Christian Jackisch, MD, PhD Sana Klinikum Offenbach Offenbach, Germany

Objectives Critically review presentations on 1. Local therapy 2. Adjuvant chemotherapy for isolated local regional recurrence 3. The optimal duration

Review of adjuvant and neo-adjuvant abstracts from SABCS 2011 January 7 th 2012

Novel Preoperative Therapies for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Debu Tripathy, MD University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

The Expert Thoughts. Alessandra Fabi Oncologia Medica 1

William J. Gradishar MD

Breast Cancer: ASCO Poster Review

Oncotype DX testing in node-positive disease

OVERVIEW OF GENE EXPRESSION-BASED TESTS IN EARLY BREAST CANCER

Profili Genici e Personalizzazione del trattamento adiuvante nel carcinoma mammario G. RICCIARDI

A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Hormonal and Her-2 Receptor Status in Carcinoma Breast

Multigene Testing in NCCN Breast Cancer Treatment Guidelines, v1.2011

Adjuvan Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

DR. BOMAN N. DHABHAR Consulting Oncologist Jaslok Hospital, Fortis Hospital Mulund, Wockhardt Hospital Mumbai & BND Onco Centre INDIA

ASCO 2017 BREAST CANCER HIGHLIGHTS

What to do after pcr in different subtypes?

Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Systemic and Local Therapy

Exosomal Del 1 as a potent diagnostic marker for breast cancer : A prospective cohort study

DR LUIS MANSO UNIDAD TUMORES DE MAMA Y GINECOLÓGICOS HOSPITAL 12 DE OCTUBRE MADRID

Luminal A and B Where are we? (or lost in translation?)

TAILORx: Established and Potential Implications for Clinical Practice

Breast cancer treatment

Positive HER-2 tumor. How to incorporate the new drugs into neoadjuvance

PRO: Pathologic Complete Response Does Predict Outcome for Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients

The Current Status and the Future Prospects of Multigene testing in Europe

A vision for HER2 future

Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: How Long is Long Enough?

Kathy Albain, MD. Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer: Who Benefits? Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine

Nadia Harbeck Breast Center University of Cologne, Germany

The next wave of successful drug therapy strategies in HER2-positive breast cancer. Hans Wildiers University Hospitals Leuven Belgium

Neoadjuvant Treatment of. of Radiotherapy

Extended Hormonal Therapy

SFSPM Novembre Valeur prédictive et pronostique de l infiltrat immunitaire dans les cancers du sein traités par chimiothérapie néoadjuvante

Breast Cancer. Most common cancer among women in the US. 2nd leading cause of death in women. Mortality rates though have declined

Update on New Perspectives in Endocrine-Sensitive Breast Cancer. James R. Waisman, MD

HER2-positive Breast Cancer

Role of Genomic Profiling in (Minimally) Node Positive Breast Cancer

Breast Cancer Earlier Disease. Stefan Aebi Luzerner Kantonsspital

Breast Cancer. Saima Saeed MD

MammaPrint, the story of the 70-gene profile

Combinatorial biomarker expression in breast cancer

Post-ESMO 2012: Tamara Rordorf Klinik für Onkologie UniversitätsSpital Zürich T.Rordorf, SAMO Luzern 1

Profili di espressione genica

The Oncotype DX Assay A Genomic Approach to Breast Cancer

It is a malignancy originating from breast tissue

Lo Studio Geparsepto. Alessandra Fabi Oncologia Medica 1

Molecular in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative detection of the mrna expression of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR and MKI67 in breast cancer tissue.

Breast Cancer Basics. Clinical Oncology for Public Health Professionals. Ben Ho Park, MD, PhD

ISPOR 4 th Asia Pacific Conference IP2 Gilberto de Lima Lopes

Breast Cancer Breast Managed Clinical Network

Hormone therapyduration: Can weselectthosepatientswho benefitfromtreatmentextension?

Impact of BMI on pathologic complete response (pcr) following neo adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced breast cancer

Role of chemotherapy in BRCA and Triple negative breast cancer. Fernando Moreno Servicio de Oncología Médica Hospital Clinico San Carlos

Ideal neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy in breast ca. Dr Khanyile Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pretoria

Targeting CDK 4/6. Jee Hyun Kim, M.D., Ph.D. Seoul National University College of Medicine

Molecular in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative detection of the mrna expression of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR and MKI67 in breast cancer tissue.

Systemic Management of Breast Cancer

TNBC: What s new Déjà vu All Over Again? Lucy R. Langer, MD MSHS Compass Oncology - SABCS 2016 Review February 21, 2017

ORMONOTERAPIA ADIUVANTE: QUALE LA DURATA OTTIMALE? MARIANTONIETTA COLOZZA

Surgical Considerations in Breast Cancer treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy

Updates From San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2017

Looking Beyond the Standard-of- Care : The Clinical Trial Option

Transcription:

ADAPT Adjuvant Dynamic marker- Adjusted Personalized Therapy trial optimizing risk assessment and therapy response prediction in early breast cancer

Therapieindikation gesteuert durch prognostische Information 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 2

Intermediate risk group (~ 30 %) 30% carriers of micromets + one third treated successfully 10% successfully treated 70 % are not carriers of micromets 70 % overtreatment 30% carriers of micromets + two thirds not successfully treated 20% mistreated 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 3

High risk group (~ 70 %) 70% carriers of micromets + one third treated successfully 23,4 % successfully treated 30 % are not carriers of micromets 30 % overtreatment 70% carriers of micromets + two thirds not successfully treated 46,6 % mistreated! 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 4

Prognostic tests ADJUVANT ONLINE ST. GALLEN upa/pai1(n0, G 2 ) Mammaprint (N 0-1 ) OncotypeDX (HR+, N 0-1 ) Weitere Signaturen 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 5

Main problems per subgroup: HR+/HER2-: overtreatment TP: overtreatment/mistreatment HER2+/HR-: mistreatment TN: mistreatment

Prediction HR endocrine therapy Her2 trastuzumab, lapatinib pcr chemotherapy

Adjuvant Dynamic marker Adjusted Personalized Therapy trial optimizing risk assessment and therapy response prediction in early breast cancer

General Inclusion Criteria I Female patients, age at diagnosis 18-75 years Histologically confirmed unilateral primary invasive carcinoma of the breast Clinical T1 - T4 (except inflammatory breast cancer) All clinical N No clinical evidence for distant metastasis (M0) Central pathology available (HR, HER2, G, ki-67, RS) Performance Status ECOG 1 or KI 80 % 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 9

Trial design Optimal baseline risk assessment Prognosis Estimation B I o P S Y* HR + HER2 + TN RS Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 10

Trial design 3 week specific induction therapy Prognosis Estimation B I o P S Y* HR + HER2 + TN RS Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes therapy 3 w Tamoxifen premenopausal patients AH postmenopausal patients Cht + antiher2 therapy Cht 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 11

Trial design Second tissue sample : early response assessment Prognosis Estimation B I o P S Y* HR + HER2 + TN RS Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes Therapy 3 w Efficacy Estimation B I o P S Y* RS Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 12

Trial design HR+: reduction of chemotherapy HER2+/TN evaluation of early surrogates for pcr Prognosis Estimation B I o P S Y* HR + HER2 + TN RS Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes Therapy 3 w Efficacy Estimation B I o P S Y* RS Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes HR+ HER2+ TN Low risk+ good responders Endocrine therapy only high risk+ low responders Cht Endocrine therapy Evaluation of early surrogates for pcr Evaluation of new targeted therapies 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 13

ADAPT Umbrella 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 14

Trial design Prospective, multi-center, controlled, non-blinded, randomized phase III Prognosis Estimation B I o P S Y* HR + HER2 + TN RS Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes Therapy 3 w Efficacy Estimation B I o P S Y* RS Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes HR + approx. 70 % HER2 + approx. 15 % TN approx. 15 % 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 15

Run-in and main phase Run in Main HR+: 400 3600 HER2+: 150* 320* TN: 150* 320* *Case numbers are to be discussed. Exact numbers will be readily available, when the protocol is amended for activation of the respective sub protocol. 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 16

Objectives Run-in Phase HR+ Analysis of feasibility/ reproducibility of each biomarker Assessment of drop out rate Assessment of proportions of marker responders vs. nonresponders Central/local pathology Central/local Ki-67 assessment Ki-67 change after inductive endocrine therapy Comparison of changes in RS, Ki-67, quantitative ER and proliferation group within the RS Assessment of percentage of low, intermediate and high-risk patients on RS and the respective rates of responders/low responders in these groups with the aim to allow early adjustment of the statistical plan Identification of other proliferation markers that drop significantly 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 17

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES Identification of a subpopulation with excellent outcome (like HR+/RS 11) over all subgroups, which in future might be spared (longer) therapy Comparison of dynamic, therapy induced early molecular changes in the different subgroups

Sub-trials: ADAPT HR+ (I+ II) 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 19

ADAPT HR+ Prognosis Estimation B I o P S Y* HR + HER2 + TN RS Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes therapy 3 w Efficacy Estimation B I o P S Y* RS Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes HR + approx. 70 % HER2 + approx. 15 % TN approx. 15 % Endocrine induction: Tam in premenopausal women Aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 20

HR+: dynamic testing translates into therapeutic consequences Hypothesis: good responders are treated sufficiently by endocrine therapy only Definition of good responder dynamic assessment of Ki-67 under 3 weeks of endocrine therapy

ADAPT I/II: HR+, HER2- N2 R cht cht Prognosis Efficacy RS>25 Ki 67 post >10%** Core biopsy ET 3 weeks Surgery/ Core biopsy N0 N1 RS12 25 *or decrease >30-50% if initial ki-67<15% **or decrease <30-50% if initial ki-67<15% Ki 67 post <10%* Ki 67 RS Ki 67 RS RS<12 ET only 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 22

HR+/HER2 intermediate risk chemo or no chemo??? intermediate risk (~50%) intermediate risk (~50%)

Statistical endpoints Run-in and whole trial HR+ Primary endpoint: ADAPT HR+/HER2- part I: Comparison of EFS in patients with intermediate risk by RS (12-25)/good response vs. patients with low risk by RS (RS 11; N0-1) both groups receiving endocrine therapy only Secondary endpoint: Evaluation of the association between baseline biomarker/ biomarker changes under induction therapy and EFS in the following groups of HR+/HER2- patients:» Patients with intermediate risk by RS (12-25) with Ki-67 response to neoadjuvant therapy, who are treated without chemotherapy» Patients with intermediate risk by RS (18-25) without Ki- 67 response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, who are 11.10.2011 treated with chemotherapy WSG GmbH 24

optimal sequencing?

ADAPT II Randomization for all patients with: pn0-1 + RS > 25 pn0-1+ RS 12-25 + low response pn2 E 90 C 600 E C E C E C Doc 100 Doc Doc Doc E 90 C 600 E C E C E C Pac 80mg q1wx12 R Doc 100 Doc Doc Doc E 90 C 600 E C E C E C Pac 80mg q1wx12 E 90 C 600 E C E C E C 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 26

Sub-trials: ADAPT HR+/HER2+(TP) 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 27

ADAPT HER2+ and TN Prognosis Estimation B I o P S Y* HR + HER2 + TN RS Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes Therapy 3 w Endocrine therapy or chemotherapy Efficacy Estimation B I o P S Y* RS Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes HR + approx. 70 % HER2 + approx. 15 % TN approx. 15 % 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 28

TP breast cancer has substantially better prognosis than HER+/HR- disease is routinely treated with the combination of chemotherapy and anti HER2 therapy has not yet been regarded upon as an separate entity

T DM1

magic bullet : T DM1 Ziel: HER2 Monoklonaler Antikörper: Trastuzumab Zytostatikum: DM1 Hochpotente Chemotherapie (Maytansin-Derivat) Verbindung/Koppler Systemisch stabil - wird erst in der Zielzelle freigesetzt T-DM1

General concept B I O P S Y R T-DM1 B I O P S Y T-DM1 + AH therapy Trastuzumab + AH therapy T-DM1 T-DM1 + AH therapy Trastuzumab + AH therapy S U R G E R Y 4xEC->Taxane* (Trastuzumab as standard for 40 weeks) *at decision of investigator in T- DM1 containing arms Ki 67 Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes MRI RS Ki 67 Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes MRI 3w pcr 12w Trastuzumab alone / EC T) 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 32

General concept B I O P S Y R T-cht B I O P S Y T-cht + AH Trastuzumab + AH therapy T-cht T-DM1 + AH therapy Trastuzumab + AH therapy S U R G E R Y 4xEC->Taxane* (Trastuzumab as standard for 40 weeks) *at decision of investigator in T- DM1 containing arms Ki 67 Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes MRI RS Ki 67 Proliferation genes Apoptosis genes MRI 3w pcr 12w Trastuzumab alone / EC T) 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 33

Therapy Neoadjuvant Treatment: T-DM1 (3,6 mg/kg q3w) x4 T-DM1 (3,6 mg/kg q3w) x4 + endocrine therapy trastuzumab (4/2 mg/kg q1w) x12 + endocrine therapy Surgery: Planed after completion of 12 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment for all patients In case of disease progression, treatment will be stopped prematurely and surgery will be performed immediately 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 34

Therapy Adjuvant Treatment: Patients with no pcr: E 90 C 600 q3w x 4 (T-DM1 containing arms) Pac 80 q1w x 12 -> E 90 C 600 q3w x 4 (trastuzumab + ET) Patients with pcr: further chemotherapy is optional Standard anti-her2 therapy: 52 weeks for all patients (i.e. for further 40 weeks after completition of neoadjuvant treatment). 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 35

Objectives Pilot Phase Concept Primary objective: Evaluation of dynamic testing (based on proliferation/apoptosis changes in serial biopsy and imaging by MRI) after three weeks of treatment as a surrogate parameter for response (pcr (residual cancer burden (RCB) 0-1) or resistance/low response (RCB II-III or progressive disease) 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 36

Additional Inclusion criteria for participation in the TP sub-protocol Confirmed ER and/or PR positive and HER2 positive by central pathology Clinical ct1c - T4a-c (participation of patients with tumors >ct2 is strongly recommended) All clinical N (participation of patients with cn+ if ct1c is strongly recommended) Patients must qualify for neoadjuvant treatment. LVEF within normal limits of each institution measured by echocardiography and normal ECG (within 42 days prior to inductive treatment) 11.10.2011 WSG GmbH 37

Thank s!