Wheat Update September 2017 ARKANSAS WHEAT PERFORMANCE TRIALS AND VARIETY SELECTION. Methods

Similar documents
Section 5: Wheat Scab Research

Section 4: Milling and Baking Quality

An IPM 1 Approach to Managing Herbicide Resistant Ryegrass in Northeast Texas. October, 2014 J. Swart, A. Braley, R. Sutton, S. Stewart, D.

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

CDC Kinley Spring wheat

Effect of Nozzles on Fungicide Efficacy for Control of Fusarium Head Blight on Barley

Tina Brandt, Nora Olsen, Jeff Stark, Rich Novy, and Jonathan Whitworth. Storage Management of. Blazer Russet. Potatoes

Field Notes July 24, 2009 Johnny Saichuk

Pear Scab in Oregon Symptoms, disease cycle and management

Plant Disease and Insect Advisory

Predicting the Unpredictable: Disease Factors in Small Grain Production. Juliet M. Marshall. Idaho Falls and Aberdeen R&E Centers

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Iron Chelates in Managing Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Grain Sorghum

Spray or Not to Spray: Scout- Based Fungicide Decisions in Wheat. Andrew Friskop NDSU Cereal Extension Plant Pathologist

2007 Field Plot Summaries: Plant Diseases & Fungicide Trials. South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007

Organic vs. Natural Foods What s the Difference?

Flea Beetle Field Scouting Guide

Corn and soybean yield responses to micronutrients fertilization

Tina Brandt, Nora Olsen, Jeff Stark, Rich Novy, Jonathan Whitworth, and Sanjay Gupta. Storage Management of. Alpine Russet.

RESPONSE OF DEKALB CORN PRODUCTS TO POPULATION

2011 Early Season Foliar Fungicide Timing Trial on Corn

Rot. Sheath. Black. Lodging. Smut. False. Smut. Kernel. Stem Rot MS R MS S. Leaf S. Brown. Narrow. Blight. Panicle. Bacter. head. Straigh.

The Efficacy of Spraying Organic Fungicides to Control Fusarium Head Blight Infection in Spring Wheat

Table 1 Disease Ratings* May 22 May 30 Tst Treatment and rate/a Inc Sev Fld Sev Inc Sev Fld Sev Bu/A** LSD P=

Update on Black Leg Disease of Canola John Damicone, Extension Plant Pathologist

in Cotton Dr. Steve Phillips Director, Southeast USA

Effect of Plant Height on Fusarium Head Blight in Spring Wheat

2006- Foliar insecticide effects on soybean aphid and soybean yield. Summary Background Objective Site and application description

Tina L. Brandt, Nora Olsen, Jeff Stark, Rich Novy, and Sanjay Gupta. Storage Management of. Classic Russet. Potatoes

Stategic Planning for Mitigation of Fusarium Head Blight in Wheat

2007 PERFORMANCE OF WINTER BARLEY (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare) AND SPRING WAXY BARLEY VARIETIES PLANTED IN THE FALL

Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Select for Resistance to FHB Various Applications

Section 2: Barley Scab Research

Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 2009

Identifying. Wheat Diseases. Affecting Heads and Grain

Impact of High Glucosinolate Mustard Biomass and Meal on Black Bean Yield

PRAIRIE RECOMMENDING COMMITTEE FOR OILSEEDS (PRCO) APPENDIX C

What s new with micronutrients in our part of the world?

2011 VERMONT ORGANIC CORN SILAGE VARIETY TRIAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

Funding for this research was provided by the Nebraska Soybean Board.

Kern County Vegetable Crops

GAINES COUNTY IPM NEWSLETTER Manda G. Cattaneo, Extension Agent - IPM 101 S. Main RM B-8. Seminole, TX 79360

2015 State Silage Corn Performance Test on the Texas High Plains

Cotton Comments OSU Southwest Oklahoma Research and Extension Center Altus, OK 2018 Current Situation

TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources

Barley and Sugarbeet Symposium

Proceedings of the 2007 CPM Short Course and MCPR Trade Show

mycotoxin-contaminated contaminated food or feed

SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES: TIPS FOR EVALUATING VARIETIES AND TEST RESULTS. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

Nitrogen Studies in Corn and Wheat. Joel Ransom NDSU Extension Agronomist

DISEASE MANAGEMENT IN WHEAT AND OTHER SMALL GRAINS. A. K. Hagan Auburn University

Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Fertility management in soybean

Soybean seed quality response among maturity groups to planting dates in the Midsouth. Larry C. Purcell & Montserrat Salmeron

SASKATOON BERRY PESTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MICHIGAN

Improving the Efficiency of Soil and Foliar Nitrogen Fertilization with a Urease Inhibitor

ADVANCING CORN YIELDS. Sulf-N Ammonium Sulfate

Potassium Deficiency in Cotton Early Detection and Alleviation

Cultivar Specific Nitrogen Management Profiles For Irrigated Process Varieties Inkster, ND 2009

2015 Forage Brassica Variety Trial

AGVISE Laboratories Established 1976

Managing Soybean Cyst Nematode

Interpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations

2007 Powdery Mildew of Cantaloupe Fungicide Trial

2013 Flax Variety Trial

REQUEST FOR SUPPORT TO REGISTER BW980. Type: Canadian Western Red Spring

Impact of High Glucosinolate Mustard Soil Amendments on Black Bean Yield 2014

EAR AND KERNEL ROTS. When to look for: Mid-August to October (and during storage)

REPORT TO THE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE OREGON PROCESSED VEGETABLE COMMISSION December 2010 Project Title: Management of Fusarium

Insecticides Labeled for Control of Bean Leaf Beetle, Mexican Bean Beetle, and Green Cloverworm. Amount product per acre

Institute of Agric ulture and Natural Resourc es Department of Plant Pathology

Nutrient management irrigated corn. Jim Camberato

Premier Russet Management Guide - Idaho

Using Tissue and Soil Tests Together Helps Make Better Decisions. John Lee Soil Scientist AGVISE Northwood, ND

Institute of Agric ulture and Natural Resourc es Department of Plant Pathology

Methods to Improve Nutrient Use Efficiency in Rice

Virulence survey and variety testing to yellow rust and stem rust in Germany

COMPARISON OF IMPREGNATED DRY FERTILIZER WITH S AND ZN BLENDS FOR CORN AND SOYBEANS

Foliar fungicide effects on soybean disease suppression, senescence and yield I.

Incorporation of Effective Stripe Rust Resistance in Montana Winter Wheat Cultivars. Photos: X. Chen, USDA/WSU

BMSB impact on vegetable and field crops in the Mid- Atlantic and research plans for 2011

The Influence of Fungicide Treatment on the Production and the Quality of Several Autumn Wheat Varieties

THE INFLUENCE OF THE NUMBER OF FUNGICIDE TREATMENTS UPON THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF WINTER WHEAT YIELD IN CLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF ARDS TURDA

Fusarium infection and mycotoxins on cereals in reduced tillage

CoRoN Enhancement of Pumpkin Fungicides: Effects on Foliar Diseases. Craig H. Canaday and Jim E. Wyatt, University of Tennessee

2001 Annual and Perennial Ryegrass Report

5. Plant Physiology/Chemistry Section

PERFORMANCE OF VARIETY MN1 IN MALAWI

USE OF OCEANGROWN PRODUCTS TO INCREASE CROP YIELD AND ESSENTIAL NUTRIENT CONTENT. Dave Franzen, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

INTERPRETING SOIL & LEAF ANALYSIS

A Guide to Citrus Nutritional Deficiency and Toxicity Identification 1

Hair-like protrusions (i.e. trichomes) occur on

PERENNIAL RYEGRASS SEED PRODUCTION RESEARCH ROSEAU/LAKE OF THE WOODS,MINNESOTA- 2010

Plant Disease and Insect Advisory

2017 Vegetable Fertility Management Trial

Auburn University Study

POISON OAK. BACKYARD HORTICULTURE By Gary W. Hickman, Horticulture Advisor University of California Cooperative Extension, Mariposa County

Short Staple Regional Cotton Variety Trial, Safford Agricultural Center, Abstract. Introduction. Materials and Methods

The Science of Maryland Agriculture

Roses with Vitazyme application

Transcription:

September 2017 Wheat Update 2017 DR. JASON P. KELLEY Extension Agronomist Wheat and Feed Grains DR. ESTEN MASON Associate Professor Wheat Breeding and Genetics RANDY MILLER Program Associate DAVID MOON Program Associate DR. TERRY SPURLOCK Assistant Professor Extension Plant Pathologist ARKANSAS WHEAT PERFORMANCE TRIALS AND VARIETY SELECTION Wheat performance trials were conducted during the 2016-2017 growing season by the Arkansas Wheat Variety Testing Program under the direction of Dr. Esten Mason to provide information about yield potential, agronomic characteristics, and disease reaction of commercially available varieties of wheat. Variety selection is very important for successful and profitable wheat production. This publication is a summary of the Arkansas Wheat Variety Testing Program results of commercially available varieties and is designed to help producers select adapted, high-yielding, disease-resistant varieties with acceptable agronomic characteristics. FIGURE 1. LOCATIONS OF ARKANSAS WHEAT PERFORMANCE TESTS 1 Northeast Research and Extension Center, Keiser Sharkey Silty Clay 2 Lon Mann Cotton Research Station, Marianna Loring Silt Loam 3 Pine Tree Research Station, Colt Calloway Silt Loam 4 Vegetable Substation, Kibler Roxanna Silt Loam 5 Extension Center, Beulah Fine Sandy Loam 6 Southeast Branch Station, Rohwer Herbert Silt Loam Methods Wheat varieties and experimental lines were entered by seed companies and public institutions and evaluated for an unbiased comparison of their performance. In general, recommended cultural practices for wheat production in Arkansas were used. All locations were planted between October 18 th and November 25 st into conventionally tilled seedbeds using small plot planters. Each trial consisted of 96 varieties and experimental lines replicated four times in a randomized complete block design. A seeding rate of 105 lb/a was used for all varieties at each location, with the exception Rohwer which was 82 lb/a. Recommended production practices were followed and pests were controlled as needed. Plots were harvested with a small plot combine to determine yields, which were adjusted to 13 percent moisture. For further details concerning methods, consult the Small-Grain Cultivar Performance Tests 2016-17, Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, located at www.arkansasvarietytesting.com. The University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture offers all its Extension and Research programs and services without regard to race, color, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, national origin, religion, age, disability, marital or veteran status, genetic information, or any other legally protected status, and is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer.

Variety Selection Variety selection is a very important management decision in wheat production, even more so in years when budgets are tight. There are many factors that producers should consider when evaluating potential wheat varieties in addition to yield potential. Genetic diversity is very important as no single variety will be the best performer every year. Planting more than one unique variety with differing maturity is the best way to spread risks. Always look at two and three-year average yields rather than yield from any particular season or location (See Table 1) to get a better understanding of the varieties overall performance. Wheat yields of commercially available varieties from the 2016-2017 trials are reported in Table 1. Yields overall were very good this year due to a warm and dry fall and winter which allowed for excellent tillering and timely applications of top-dress nitrogen. Some entries, especially the early maturing varieties started jointing very early and headed early. A freeze on March 15 th with lows in the mid-20 s likely caused some injury at some locations, especially to early varieties. Foliar diseases were relatively light in most locations, but leaf rust was heavy at Rohwer and other locations late in the season. Leaf and stripe rust ratings are found in Table 2. Fusarium head blight (scab) was rated from a misted and inoculated field nursery at. Fusarium head blight levels were very high in this trial, much higher than the relatively low levels seen in commercial fields this year. Fusarium head blight ratings are found in Table 2. Agronomic characteristics of a variety are also important to consider when choosing a variety. Below are several factors to consider when making variety selections for this fall: Relative Maturity Variety maturity is a very important factor to consider when selecting varieties. Producers should select several different varieties with differing maturity to reduce risks for a late spring freeze. Early maturing varieties typically should not be planted early in the planting season. These varieties do not have as much of a vernilization requirement as later maturing varieties and can begin jointing very early in the spring, which increases the likelihood of freeze injury from a late spring freeze. Late maturity varieties require a greater vernilization period and generally do not begin to joint as quickly as early maturing varieties. An ideal planting order by maturity would be to plant late maturity varieties first, medium maturity varieties second and early maturing varieties last. Planting varieties with differing maturity may help spread out harvest operations so that wheat can be harvested when ready. An estimated relative maturity rating based on heading date can be found in Table 3. Test Weight Many producers have experienced low test weight wheat during the last few years as a result of excessive rainfall after maturity and or from delayed harvest. Harvesting wheat timely is important to achieve high test weight wheat. Foliar diseases such as leaf rust and stripe rust can also be a factor in causing low test weight wheat. There are some varieties have characteristically higher test weights than others and test weight should be a variety selection criteria. When environmental conditions cause poor test weights, varieties with high test weight potential usually have heavier test weights than other varieties. Selecting a variety with a good test weight along with good foliar disease resistance can reduce the likelihood of having low test weight wheat that may be discounted at the grain terminal. Differences in test weight of 3 to 4 lbs/bu or more between varieties is common. Lodging Resistance Lodging resistance is important to prevent yield losses and to allow for efficient harvest. Variety, nitrogen rate, and seeding rate all have an impact on lodging. Varieties with low lodging scores and high yields are preferred. Lodging ratings taken in 2017 were relatively low and are shown in Table 3. Disease Resistance Stripe rust resistance is very important for Mid-South wheat producers to consider. Foliar fungicides can help control stripe rust, but can add additional production expense that could be avoided with a variety that is resistant to stripe rust. Varieties that are susceptible or very susceptible to stripe rust may need more than one fungicide application to provide adequate control if conditions are favorable for disease development. Keep in mind, stripe rust ratings are taken after heading. Many varieties can have stripe rust develop prior to heading (February-March) even though they may be resistant varieties. Resistance genes become active after jointing. Leaf rust and fusarium head blight resistance should also be considered when choosing wheat varieties. Leaf rust developed late in 2017 impacting yield and test weight of many susceptible varieties that were not treated with a foliar fungicide. A summary of all available foliar disease ratings taken in the spring of 2017 are found in Table 2. Insect Resistance Hessian fly can be a problem in Arkansas wheat especially in very early planted wheat. There are several biotypes of Hessian fly, but the predominant biotype of the Hessian fly present in Arkansas is Biotype L. Delayed planting is a recommended practice for avoiding Hessian fly problems.

Table 1. Arkansas Wheat Performance Trials Summary of Commercially Available Entries, 2017. ---Statewide Yield (Bu/acre) --- ---Delta Region Yield (Bu/acre)--- Entry Name 2-year 3-year 2017 2017 2-year 3-year 2017 average average average Rank average average average AgriMAXX 415 72.2 71.1 77.5 18 72.5 73.5 75.7 AgriMAXX 444 66.7 65.7 69.0 36 67.1 68.4 66.5 AgriMAXX 446 67.8 66.9 68.8 38 68.9 69.6 67.8 AgriMAXX 463 67.5 62.6 47 68.0 62.9 AgriMAXX 464 56.2 51 58.4 AgriMAXX 473 78.9 80.7 11 80.6 79.7 AgriMAXX 474 74.0 26 72.2 AgriMAXX 475 73.7 74.3 25 74.3 72.0 AGS 2038 73.7 69.3 76.2 22 76.6 72.1 76.2 AGS 2055 81.0 77.6 82.8 6 82.3 79.8 84.0 Armor Ambush 71.4 70.3 35 73.3 71.1 Armor Lockdown 84.4 1 83.9 Armor Mayhem 79.1 80.3 14 80.2 77.9 Armor Menace 73.2 73.4 27 74.3 72.6 Delta Grow 1000 77.3 74.5 77.6 17 79.7 78.6 77.6 Delta Grow 3500 71.0 63.5 71.8 31 74.0 65.1 74.4 Dixie Bell 500 66.2 66.4 65.9 41 64.8 67.7 63.0 Dixie Bell 600 69.9 69.0 36 69.0 66.7 Dixie Bentley 78.0 81.6 9 80.1 82.6 Dixie Brown 78.5 81.4 10 80.2 81.2 Dixie Kelsey II 67.7 66.2 70.8 34 67.7 68.6 68.7 Dixie McAlister 73.1 71.8 76.6 20 73.3 74.4 74.7 Dyna-Gro 9012 72.6 70.2 75.1 24 74.1 73.2 73.8 Dyna-Gro 9171 76.0 72.7 79.6 15 75.9 74.5 77.2 Dyna-Gro 9223 59.7 49 56.8 Dyna-Gro 9522 65.1 64.8 65.7 43 63.7 65.6 62.6 Dyna-Gro 9600 51.6 52 54.6 Dyna-Gro 9701 79.3 80.6 12 81.5 80.6 Dyna-Gro 9750 66.4 40 67.3 GO Wheat 2058 73.6 72.1 77.9 16 77.0 76.4 78.3 GO Wheat 2059 66.4 64.5 45 66.0 64.0 LCS 3204 67.3 39 65.7 Pioneer 26R10 64.4 65.1 65.8 42 63.4 65.7 62.4 Pioneer 26R36 76.9 75.8 83.4 4 77.4 78.1 81.6 Pioneer 26R41 80.5 77.4 83.5 3 81.8 79.5 83.1 Pioneer 26R53 73.0 71.5 77.4 19 72.9 73.0 76.3 Pioneer 26R59 73.6 71.4 76.3 21 72.9 72.3 74.5 Pioneer 26R87 69.2 64.5 71.7 32 70.8 66.5 73.9 Progeny #BOSS 82.4 8 81.0 Progeny #Bullet 78.1 80.5 13 80.6 78.7 Progeny #Turbo 71.9 75.2 23 71.6 73.5 Progeny #Warrior 66.2 71.4 33 66.7 69.1 Progeny P243 58.1 58.9 60.4 48 60.9 63.2 61.5 Progeny P357 48.5 48.1 42.1 53 46.7 48.5 38.0

Table 1. Arkansas Wheat Performance Trials Summary of Commercially Available Entries, 2017. ---Statewide Yield (Bu/acre) --- ---Delta Region Yield (Bu/acre)--- Entry Name 2-year 3-year 2017 2017 2-year 3-year 2017 average average average Rank average average average SY 547 63.9 46 63.1 SY Harrison 65.3 65.5 64.7 44 64.9 66.8 63.7 SY Viper 69.5 67.0 72.4 29 68.2 68.1 69.3 USG 3197 57.5 50 59.6 USG 3404 68.5 65.9 72.1 30 68.6 67.6 70.7 USG 3448 72.7 28 70.9 USG 3536 80.6 82.8 6 82.7 81.3 USG 3895 84.2 2 82.5 VA Hilliard 78.8 74.8 82.9 5 80.7 77.5 82.8 Mean 71.8 68.4 72.4 30 72.6 70.6 71.5 *Delta average is calculated from Keiser, Marianna,, Pine Tree and Rohwer locations. For detailed information on each location consult the 2016-2017 Arkansas Wheat Cultivar Performance Publication at: http://www.arkansasvarietytesting.com/home/wheat/ Table 2. Disease Reactions of Commercially Available Wheat Varieties in Arkansas Performance Trials,2017. Entry Name % Stripe Rust %Leaf Rust Fusarium Head Blight Severity, 0-100, Fusarium Damaged Kernels, 0-100, AgriMAXX 415 0 17 3 15 AgriMAXX 444 0 31 5 15 AgriMAXX 446 2 50 3 18 AgriMAXX 463 1 17 0 8 AgriMAXX 464 36 15 3 53 AgriMAXX 473 0 5 0 23 AgriMAXX 474 2 64 5 40 AgriMAXX 475 0 28 5 23 AGS 2038 2 2 25 60 AGS 2055 2 1 25 73 Armor Ambush 4 10 3 16 Armor Lockdown 1 4 13 43 Armor Mayhem 1 8 3 10 Armor Menace 0 43 0 5 Delta Grow 1000 0 5 0 5 Delta Grow 3500 6 6 20 28 Dixie Bell 500 1 33 5 35 Dixie Bell 600 1 37 5 28 Dixie Bentley 1 2 30 23 Dixie Brown 0 6 0 5 Dixie Kelsey II 0 42 5 40 Dixie McAlister 0 33 5 43 Dyna-Gro 9012 0 23 3 35 Dyna-Gro 9171 0 29 3 58

Table 2. Disease Reactions of Commercially Available Wheat Varieties in Arkansas Performance Trials,2017. Entry Name % Stripe Rust %Leaf Rust Fusarium Head Blight Severity 0-100, Fusarium Damaged Kernels 0-100, Dyna-Gro 9223 0 72 13 38 Dyna-Gro 9522 0 31 10 30 Dyna-Gro 9600 36 12 10 30 Dyna-Gro 9701 0 5 0 45 Dyna-Gro 9750 2 11 3 28 GO Wheat 2058 7 6 5 4 GO Wheat 2059 0 14 0 2 LCS 3204 4 42 18 38 Pioneer 26R10 15 55 5 58 Pioneer 26R36 2 12 8 40 Pioneer 26R41 0 6 5 35 Pioneer 26R53 2 54 0 2 Pioneer 26R59 2 29 0 10 Pioneer 26R87 7 12 23 7 Progeny #BOSS 2 17 48 78 Progeny #Bullet 0 7 8 38 Progeny #Turbo 1 11 38 43 Progeny #Warrior 4 45 10 25 Progeny P243 15 38 10 30 Progeny P357 11 65 13 38 SY 547 12 6 3 20 SY Harrison 1 53 8 43 SY Viper 0 40 10 13 USG 3197 30 5 10 68 USG 3404 0 42 5 20 USG 3448 0 32 5 25 USG 3536 0 6 3 5 USG 3895 0 14 25 55 VA Hilliard 0 6 10 33 Mean 4 24 9 30 Leaf and stripe rust ratings are averages from all locations with ratings in 2017.

Table 3. Agronomic Characteristics of Commercially Available Varieties in Arkansas Performance Trials, 2017. Test Wt. Lodging Plant Ht Heading Maturity Relative Awned Entry Name Lb/bu 0-9 scale Inches Date Date Maturity Heads AgriMAXX 415 55.4 1 36 1-Apr 13-May Medium Yes AgriMAXX 444 53.6 0 36 3-Apr 14-May Late Yes AgriMAXX 446 55.2 2 35 2-Apr 16-May Late Yes AgriMAXX 463 53.6 3 35 29-Mar 11-May Early No AgriMAXX 464 51.6 0 38 30-Mar 13-May Medium Yes AgriMAXX 473 54.9 2 38 1-Apr 12-May Medium Yes AgriMAXX 474 53.2 0 34 31-Mar 11-May Medium No AgriMAXX 475 53.4 1 34 1-Apr 14-May Medium Yes AGS 2038 53.2 1 41 30-Mar 15-May Medium Yes AGS 2055 54.7 1 38 28-Mar 13-May Early Yes Armor Ambush 54.2 0 37 30-Mar 12-May Medium No Armor Lockdown 56.2 3 40 27-Mar 10-May Early Yes Armor Mayhem 54.8 0 38 2-Apr 13-May Late Yes Armor Menace 53.8 0 35 29-Mar 15-May Early Yes Delta Grow 1000 54.8 1 38 2-Apr 13-May Late Yes Delta Grow 3500 53.6 1 35 26-Mar 9-May Early Yes Dixie Bell 500 52.6 1 36 2-Apr 16-May Late Yes Dixie Bell 600 51.5 0 38 1-Apr 13-May Medium Yes Dixie Bentley 56.0 0 40 28-Mar 9-May Early Yes Dixie Brown 55.0 1 38 31-Mar 12-May Medium Yes Dixie Kelsey II 53.4 2 37 2-Apr 14-May Late Yes Dixie McAlister 54.1 0 34 2-Apr 11-May Late Yes Dyna-Gro 9012 55.7 1 35 1-Apr 13-May Medium Yes Dyna-Gro 9171 54.1 1 35 31-Mar 14-May Medium Yes Dyna-Gro 9223 50.9 1 34 1-Apr 11-May Medium No Dyna-Gro 9522 54.1 1 37 2-Apr 13-May Late Yes Dyna-Gro 9600 51.3 1 35 27-Mar 10-May Early Yes Dyna-Gro 9701 54.8 0 39 31-Mar 13-May Medium Yes Dyna-Gro 9750 53.2 2 35 29-Mar 12-May Early No GO Wheat 2058 55.3 0 32 1-Apr 14-May Medium Yes GO Wheat 2059 53.3 0 35 29-Mar 11-May Early No LCS 3204 56.3 1 39 29-Mar 11-May Early No Pioneer 26R10 52.6 1 36 1-Apr 13-May Medium Yes Pioneer 26R36 53.9 0 37 2-Apr 15-May Late Yes Pioneer 26R41 55.4 1 33 1-Apr 11-May Medium Yes Pioneer 26R53 55.3 2 34 30-Mar 13-May Medium Yes Pioneer 26R59 50.6 1 32 1-Apr 11-May Medium No Pioneer 26R87 56.1 2 36 26-Mar 9-May Early Yes Progeny #BOSS 54.0 1 35 31-Mar 13-May Medium Yes Progeny #Bullet 54.9 1 38 2-Apr 11-May Late Yes Progeny #Turbo 55.3 1 34 27-Mar 9-May Early No Progeny #Warrior 53.4 2 34 31-Mar 11-May Medium No Progeny P243 53.6 1 37 29-Mar 13-May Early Yes Progeny P357 51.3 1 36 4-Apr 14-May Late Yes SY 547 54.1 0 37 31-Mar 14-May Medium No

Table 3. Agronomic Characteristics of Commercially Available Varieties in Arkansas Performance Trials, 2017. Test Wt. Lodging Plant Ht Heading Maturity Relative Awned Entry Name Lb/bu 0-9 scale Inches Date Date Maturity Heads SY Harrison 51.6 0 34 1-Apr 15-May Medium Yes SY Viper 54.4 4 40 27-Mar 11-May Early No USG 3197 51.8 0 37 29-Mar 12-May Early Yes USG 3404 53.3 1 37 2-Apr 13-May Late Yes USG 3448 53.3 1 35 31-Mar 15-May Medium Yes USG 3536 54.8 1 39 2-Apr 12-May Late Yes USG 3895 53.0 0 34 1-Apr 17-May Medium Yes VA Hilliard 54.4 0 37 28-Mar 12-May Early Yes Mean 53.9 1 36 31-Mar 12-May -- -- Test weight, lodging (0-9 scale with 0 having no lodging), mature plant height, heading date and maturity date are averages from all trials with data during the 2016-17 growing season. Heading date is the average date that 50% of heads had emerged. Maturity date is the average date that 90% of the culms were yellow. Relative maturity rating is based on heading date.