Grade separated interchange at the intersection of U.S. Hwy 17 Bypass and Farrow Parkway

Similar documents
3/18/03 CE Keith P. Brabant, P.E.

SEPTEMBER, 2006 ROAD DESIGN MANUAL 7-0(1) CHAPTER 7 PAVEMENT DESIGN

Three Bridges at I-64/Mercury Boulevard Interchange in Hampton, VA

Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Integrated Bridge Systems (IBS) John Bowders University of Missouri

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN

NSW Coastal, Ocean and Port Engineering Panel

Appendix B. Shallow Foundations Report

Technology. Reinforced Earth Wall Typical Section. Traffic Barrier. Roadway. Select Granular Material. Facing Panel Random Backfill.

Bengt H. Fellenius. Wick Drains and Piling for Cai Mep Container Port, Vietnam, and the true cost of 5 cent per foot. Amsterdam.

Wick Drains and Piling for Cai Mep Container Port, Vietnam. Bengt H. Fellenius. Sower's Lecture Atlanta May 8, 2012

ATTACHMENT B8 Incident History

EVALUATION OF FIELD PERFORMANCE OF PREFABRICATED VERTICAL DRAINS (PVD) FOR SOIL GROUND IMPROVEMENT IN THE SOUTHERN VIETNAM

Geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments

A Tale of Two Bridges: Comparison between the Seismic Performance of Flexible and Rigid Abutments

Novel treatment technique

Ahmed Mongi, M.S., P.E. Engineering Division

Modified Sheet Pile Abutment for Low-Volume Road Bridge

Use of Ductile Iron Pipe Piles for a New Shared Use Path Bridge over Maribyrnong River in West Melbourne

Effect of Pile Orientation in Skewed Integral Abutment Bridges

Design of Dingley Bypass Integral Bridges

Integral Abutment Bridge Design with Soil Structure Interaction

Thermal Response of Integral Abutment Bridges With Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls

Shifting the Canning Bus Bridge Sideways

Earthquake Hazard Assessment Along Designated Emergency Vehicle Priority Access Routes

Figure 3: Analytic procedure

The UCD community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters!

Geotechnical Issues Associated With the Design and Construction of the Middle River Bridge

research report Field Measurements on Skewed Semi-Integral Bridge With Elastic Inclusion: Instrumentation Report

Modified Sheet Pile Abutments for Low-Volume Road Bridges

DATA GATHERING AND DESIGN DETAILS OF AN INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGE

OVER US 6 LATERAL BRIDGE SLIDE: I-75

Detailed Seismic Assessment and Seismic Improvements of Market Road Underpass

Semi-Integral Abutment Bridges

Integral bridges and environmental conditions

Integral Abutment Bridges-Development of Soil Model for Soil Structure Interaction in Time History Analysis

Seismic Response of Piled Bridge Abutments in Multi-Layered Liquefiable Soils Deposits

ASD and LRFD of Reinforced SRW with the use of software Program MSEW(3.0)

Appendix C Guidelines for Design of Integral Abutments March 3, 2003

The Structure upon which the ends of a Bridge rests is referred to as an Abutment

Monitored Displacements of a Unique Geosynthetic-Reinforced Walls Supporting Bridge and Approaching Roadway Structures

Rebuilding and widening the 54- year-old Jane Addams Memorial Tollway into a state-of-the-art corridor linking Rockford to Elgin (three lanes) and

\\H\15\ PH9 Inspection Photos

Numerical analysis of the embedded abutments of integral bridges

Update on Seismic Behavior and Design of

ABC OF BRIDGE NO. 465 I-195 Ramp (Dr-2) Over Warren Avenue

BEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS OF AN INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGE

L. Greenfield Christchurch City Council M. Cowan Opus International Consultants W. du Plessis HEB Construction 26 March 2015

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

Bahavior and Analysis of an Integral Abutment Bridge

DESIGN ASSESSMENT OF THE FOUNDERS/MEADOWS GRS ABUTMENT STRUCTURE

Application of pile underpinning technology on shield machine crossing through pile foundations of road bridge

Low-Volume Road Abutment Design Standards

An Integral Abutment Bridge with Precast Concrete Piles

APPENDIX H. Limit Equilibrium Analysis of Dike 1 Abutments Prior to Failure

Assessing potential cracking zones in embankment dams

Emergency Bridge Stabilization at Mile Watrous Subdivision

APPENDIX A INTEGRAL ABUTMENTS

Bridge pile abutment deck interaction in laterally spreading ground: Lessons from Christchurch

ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: THE REPLACEMENT OF MD 362 OVER MONIE CREEK

Earthquake Resistance of Bridges With Friction Slab Abutments

Ashton Avenue Integral Bridge

LANDFILL STABILITY ISSUES

IL 115 OVER GAR CREEK ACCELERATED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT. Chad Hodel, S.E., P.E. (WHKS) Stan Kaderbek, S.E., P.E. (Milhouse)

Executive Summary RPT-GEN November 28. Bridge No Quartz Creek Bridge Inspection Report

Field Reconnaissance on the Damage of Transportation Facilities in the 2007 Niigata Chuetsu-oki Earthquake

2007 Niigata Chuetsu-oki Earthquake, Field Reconnaissance Report

EFFECT OF BACKFILL SOIL TYPE ON STIFFNESS AND CAPACITY OF BRIDGE ABUTMENTS

Kentucky Lake Bridge Pipe Pile Load Test Program 45 th Annual STGEC Mobile, AL October 27-30, 2014

CHAPTER 5 MODELING OF THE BRIDGE

EFFECTS OF SPATIAL VARIATION OF SEISMIC INPUTS ON BRIDGE LONGITUDINAL RESPONSE

Prefabricated Vertical Drain with Fabric

Long Term Monitoring of a Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated Bridge System (GRS IBS)

THERMAL RESPO SE OF I TEGRAL ABUTME T BRIDGES WITH MSE WALLS: UMERICAL A ALYSES A D A PRACTICAL A ALYSIS TOOL

5 DAMAGE TO TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES

Lesner Bridge Replacement. April 24, 2017 Update. Construction Camera. Rendering of the Completed Lesner Bridge Structure

MODIFICATION OF IDOT INTEGRAL ABUTMENT DESIGN LIMITATIONS

MSBRIDGE: OPENSEES PUSHOVER AND EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF MULTI-SPAN BRIDGES - USER MANUAL

RAKED PILES FOR ABUTMENT AND THE BENEFITS OF DRIVEN PRECAST CONCRETE PILES FOR LOW CARBON INFRASTRUCTURE.

2011 BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

STATE ROUTE 30 OVER BESSEMER AVE. SUPERSTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT IN 57 HOURS

Critically damaged bridges & concepts for earthquake recovery

FIELD INSTRUMENTATIONS AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED SOIL INTEGRATED BRIDGE SYSTEM (GRS-IBS)

THE EFFECT OF EPS GEOFOAM BACKFILL ON THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGES MEGAN OOMS. A thesis submitted to the

Flume Installation Instructions

PERFORMANCE OF REINFORCED EARTH BRIDGE ABUTMENT WALLS IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES

Introduction. Substructure Inspection and Rating. Introduction. Introduction 28/03/2017

APPENDIX A - THE BEHAVIOR OF INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGES

Integral Bridge Design - Derivation of the Spring Constant for Modelling the Soil-Structure Interaction

Forces in Wingwalls from Thermal Expansion of Skewed Semi-Integral Bridges

Development of Abutment Design Standards for Local Bridge Designs Volume 1 of 3

Caleb Mitchell. B.S., Kansas State University, 2016 A THESIS. submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE

Retrofit to improve earthquake performance of bridge abutment slopes

Integral-Abutment Bridges: Problems and Innovative Solutions Using EPS Geofoam and Other Geosynthetics

AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOR OF RC PARAPET WALL OF ABUTMENT UNDER COLLISION

Thermal Response of a Highly Skewed Integral Bridge

Field and Analytical Studies of the First Folded Plate Girder Bridge

Experimental and Analytical Investigation of UHPC Pile-to-Abutment Connections

Permanent deformation of bridge abutment on liquefiable soils

Seismic Analysis of Bridge Abutment-Soil Systems

Transcription:

Grade separated interchange at the intersection of U.S. Hwy 17 Bypass and Farrow Parkway Jeff Sizemore, P.E. Geotechnical Design Support Engineer SCDOT Ed Tavera, P.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer Geoengineers

Need for Project: The purpose of the project is to improve traffic flow, increase intersection capacity, and improve safety within the intersection and along US 17. The US 17 and SC 707/ Farrow Parkway intersection is currently experiencing substantial congestion during peak morning and afternoon travel periods.

Project Site Enlarged Map Zone Project Site

Existing US 17 Bypass US17 BP East

Proposed US17 Bypass US 17 BP

Project Layout Ramp C Backgate Bridge Ramp D Ramp A End Bent 1 End Bent 7 Ramp B South Bridge Approach North Bridge Approach

South Subsurface Profile

North Subsurface Profile

Geotechnical concerns?

Project Design Constraints Project Geometry and Layout Project Constructed on Existing Alignment while maintaining all traffic movements Complex Traffic Control Staging Plan (traffic moved around several times) Total Project Construction Time Requirements Approx. 3.5 years High Traffic Volume Combined with Limited Construction Staging Areas

Geotechnical Key Issues Consolidation Settlement, both total and differential Seismic Slope Stability (Liquefaction) Bridge Abutment Foundation Performance Extreme Event I and II

Settlement At Bridge Abutments (Normal Weight Fill)

Longitudinal Seismic Slope Instability

Transverse Seismic Slope Instability

Stiff Clay (Pee Dee Formation) 66 - HP14X117 X 100 ft long Bridge Abutment Unimproved Foundation Performance Axial Load Bridge Lateral Load Extreme Event II Extreme Event I Excessive Sand Medium Clay 40 feet 90 feet Row 3 2 1 End Bent 7 (North Abutment)

Ground Improvement Methods Lightweight Aggregate Borrow Material Reduce Magnitude of total and differential Settlement Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) / Granular Surcharges Increased Rate of Settlement during Construction to meet project time constraints Deep Soil Mixing used to establish Seismic Slope Stability and to improve Bridge Abutment Foundation Performance Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Walls Temporary faced MSE Walls used to allow wall deformations along the panel facing (2 stage walls)

Lightweight Aggregate (Rotary Kiln Produced) Required Properties: Internal Friction Angle 40 degrees Unit Weight: 60 pcf minimum (Long-term 70 pcf maximum) MSE Wall Reinforced Backfill Properties

Settlement South Bridge Abutment (End Bent 1)

Settlement North Bridge Abutment (End Bent 7)

Prefabricated Vertical Drains (PVD)

PVD Installation S PVD PVD Triangular Installation Pattern PVD 2 Drainage Sand Layer Geotextile Separator Fabric

Granular Surcharges Required Properties: Internal Friction Angle 32 degrees Unit Weight: 120 pcf Granular Surcharge Lightweight Aggregate Borrow Material

Seismic Slope Stability Improved Deep Soil Mixing

Ground Improvement North/South Abutment (Typical) Deep Soil Mixing

Deep Soil Mixing Lime-Cement Columns Block Type Pattern - Overlapping (Dry Mix Method) Seismic Slope Stabilization Shear Key Improved Performance of Bridge Abutment Foundations

10 Feet Min. DSM-LCC Test Sections 10 Feet Min. 1 2 Test Pile 1 (HP 14x117) 4 3 Test LCC No. 1 2 3 4 DSM-LCC Test Section 1 (Block Type Pattern) Test LCC Sampling Quadrants DSM-LCC Test Section 2 (Single Line Pattern) Legend Test Lime-Cement Columns (Test LCC)

Bridge Abutment Improved Foundation Performance End Bent 7 (North Abutment) Extreme Event I < ¼ End Bent 7 (North Abutment) Extreme Event II (Case 3) < 1/8

Geotechnical Instrumentation Settlement Monitoring 12 VW Settlement Sensors (SS) 15 VW Piezometers (P) 2 VW Data Collection Centers 10 Settlement Plates (SP) 2 Magnetic Extensometer (ME) Slope Stability 6 Slope Indicator

Traffic Control Stage 2 Ramp A Ramp B

Traffic Stage 2 Ground Improvement Ramp A Ramp B MSE Walls Lightweight Aggregate Borrow Material 2, and 3 Granular Surcharge (Normal Weight) 3 and 4 Triangular Spacing PVD Geotechnical Instrumentation

Traffic Control Stage 3 Ramp C Ramp D

Traffic Stage 3 -Ground Improvement Ramp C Ramp D MSE Walls Lightweight Aggregate Borrow Material 1, 2, and 4 Granular Surcharge (Normal Weight) 3 and 4 Triangular Spacing PVD Geotechnical Instrumentation

Traffic Control Stage 4 Backgate Bridge South Bridge Approach North Bridge Approach

Traffic Stage 4 -Ground Improvement South Bridge Approach Bridge South Bridge Approach MSE Walls Lightweight Aggregate Borrow Material 1, 2, and 3 Granular Surcharge (Normal Weight) 3 Triangular Spacing PVD Geotechnical Instrumentation Bridge Abutment DSM-LCC (South 30 x 133 x 50 deep North 30 x 141 x 70 deep ) Longitudinal DSM-LCC (South 5 Wide / North 8 Wide)

X- Section End Bent 7 (250+26)

Initial MSE Wall Construction (2 & 3 Stage Wall Construction) Drainage Pipe Flexible Wire Facing B Req MSE Wall Soil Reinforcement Light Weight Aggregate Geotextile Separator Fabric

2-Stage MSE Wall Construction (Stage 1 of 2) Sand Surcharge Sand Surcharge Flexible Wire Facing Light Weight Aggregate Borrow Material

Permanent Precast Concrete Segmental Panel Flexible Wire Facing Fill Void w/light Weight Fill Precast Concrete Segmental Panel Lightweight Aggregate Precast Concrete Panel Connector 1 Minimum 2 Maximum

MSE Walls Permanent MSE Walls Two-Stage Construction Three-Stage Construction (w/drainage Structures) Temporary MSE Walls (Welded Wire Mesh Facing)

Project Construction Phase (North Abutment Sta. 252+00) Ramp D Stage 3 Bridge Approach Embankment Stage 4 Ramp B Stage 2

Bridge Abutment Construction (North Abutment End Bent 7)

US 17- Bypass Over SC707/Farrow Parkway (Backgate Bridge) Myrtle Beach, SC Horry County Thank You Any Questions?