APPENDIX G - Organ/Tissue Weighting Factors and Detriment/Risk Coefficients

Similar documents
Recent Progress in Radiation Dosimetry for Epidemiology and Radiological Protection. John Harrison ICRP Committee 2

3 rd International Symposium on the System of Radiological Protection Seoul, October John Harrison

GUIDELINES ON IONISING RADIATION DOSE LIMITS AND ANNUAL LIMITS ON INTAKE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

ICRP Recommendations Evolution or Revolution? John R Cooper Main Commission

Review of the Radiobiological Principles of Radiation Protection

STANDARDIZED RADIOGENIC CANCER RISK COEFFICIENTS: A REVIEW OF THE METHODOLOGY PRESENTED IN FEDERAL GUIDANCE REPORT NO. 13

Biological Effects of Radiation KJ350.

Radiation related cancer risk & benefit/risk assessment for screening procedures

DRAFT REPORT FOR CONSULTATION: DO NOT REFERENCE. Annals of the ICRP ICRP PUBLICATION 1XX

PHY138Y Nuclear and Radiation

Risks from Internal Emitters - misuse of equivalent and effective dose

RADIATION RISK ASSESSMENT

CHAPTER 6 DOSE AND RISK ESTIMATION

Learning Objectives. Review of the Radiobiological Principles of Radiation Protection. Radiation Effects

Dosimetric Consideration in Diagnostic Radiology

Assessment of effective dose in paediatric CT examinations

2005 RECOMMENDATIONS OF ICRP

Organ Dose Variability with Gender, Age and BMI

Radiation Protection Program Update: The Details. July 2010

ESTIMATING RADIOGENIC CANCER RISKS

Ionizing Radiation. Nuclear Medicine

Ernest Rutherford:

Dose Estimates for Nuclear Medicine Procedures: What are they? Where do they come from?

Radiation Safety Information for Students in Courses given by the Nuclear Physics Group at KTH, Stockholm, Sweden

Adult: > 18 Years ALARA: As low as reasonably achievable ALI:

HEALTH RISKS FROM LOW-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE TO RADIONUCLIDES

Radiation Dose Specification

ALTERNATIVES TO THE EFFECTIVE DOSE FOR STOCHASTIC RISK ASSESSMENT IN MEDICAL IMAGING

Risk of Secondary Fatal Malignancies from Hi-Art Tomotherapy

Radiopharmaceuticals. Radionuclides in NM. Radionuclides NUCLEAR MEDICINE. Modes of radioactive decays DIAGNOSTIC THERAPY CHEMICAL COMPOUND

Modifying EPA Radiation Risk Models Based on BEIR VII. Draft White Paper

Radiation Safety for New Medical Physics Graduate Students

ICRP RECOMMENDATIONS AND IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS: THEN AND NOW

Cancer Risk Factors in Ontario. Other Radiation

1/31/2014. Radiation Biology and Risk to the Public

CONTENTS NOTE TO THE READER...1 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS...3

Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation & Commonly Used Radiation Units

Role and Responsibility of Medical Staff in Nuclear Accident

Indoor emissions. foams) > CH 2 =O; plasticizers, especially dialkyl phthalates. Especially a problem with mobile homes. - Regulations in Sweden

Core Concepts in Radiation Exposure 4/10/2015. Ionizing Radiation, Cancer, and. James Seward, MD MPP

Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation & Commonly Used Radiation Units

STUDIES OF LOW-DOSE RADIATION AND CANCER. E. Lubin

FAX, A FEMALE ADULT VOXEL PHANTOM FOR RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY

CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction

ICRP = International Commission on. recommendations and guidance on. Functioning since 1928.

BEIR VII: Epidemiology and Models for Estimating Cancer Risk

7/22/2014. Radiation Induced Cancer: Mechanisms. Challenges Identifying Radiogenic Cancers at Low Dose & Low Dose Rate (<100 mgy & <5 10 mgy/h)

ICRP Symposium on the International System of Radiological Protection

Dosimetry of recently introduced CBCT Units for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology

Radiological Protection Countermeasures after TEPCO Fukushima NPP Accident -Who should play the role of risk communication-

Author's personal copy

Radiation Doses in Radiology: Influence of Standards and Regulations

RADON RISK IN URANIUM MINING AND ICRP

Radiation Dose Rates from Patients Administrated Radiopharmaceuticals Used for Brain Blood Flow Investigation.

TM on the New Dose Limits for the Lens of the Eye: Implications and Implementation

Application of the Commission's Recommendations for the Protection of People in

Ryan Niederkohr, M.D. Slides are not to be reproduced without permission of author

Radionuclide Concentrations in Food and the Environment

ICRP 128 ICRP ICRP ICRP 1928

Annex X of Technical Volume 4 RADIATION AND HEALTH EFFECTS AND INFERRING RADIATION RISKS FROM THE FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI ACCIDENT

APPENDIX K - Exposure Limits For Uranium

Bill Field Bill Field, PhD, MS Department of Occupational and Environmental Health Department of Epidemiology

Medical Physics 4 I3 Radiation in Medicine

Estimates of Risks LONG-TERM LOW DOSE EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION

JHM-IRB Guidelines for Radiation Statements

Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Radiation. Tim Marshel R.T. (R)(N)(CT)(MR)(NCT)(PET)(CNMT)

MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS FOR HOMELAND SECURITY USING ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOMS. A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty.

Paper RADIATION EFFECTIVENESS FACTORS FOR USE IN CALCULATING PROBABILITY OF CAUSATION OF RADIOGENIC CANCERS

JRPR. A Comparative Review of Radiation-induced Cancer Risk Models. Technical Paper. Introduction

Section 7 ALARA Program

Save Our Sievert! Ches Mason BHP Billiton Uranium, 55 Grenfell Street, Adelaide, SA5000, Australia

POTENTIAL HEALTH RISKS

Radiation Health Effects

Managing the imaging dose during Image-guided Radiotherapy. Martin J Murphy PhD Department of Radiation Oncology Virginia Commonwealth University

Laboratory Safety 197/405. Types of Radiation 198/405

How to assess doses from internal emitters

QUANTIFICATION OF THE RISK-REFLECTING STOCHASTIC AND DETERMINISTIC RADIATION EFFECTS

Risk of secondary cancers after radiotherapy. for benign diseases

Ionizing Radiation. Michael J. Vala, CHP. Bristol-Myers Squibb

HEALTH P H Y S I C S SOCIETY

Introduction. Chapter 15 Radiation Protection. Advisory bodies. Regulatory bodies. Main Principles of Radiation Protection

Current and Planned NCRP Activities

Chem 481 Lecture Material 3/11/09

Impact of ICRP-89 Based Models on Dose Estimates for Radiopharmaceuticals and CT Exams

From Epidemiology to Risk Factors aka DDREF: Light and Shadows

Ask EuroSafe Imaging Tips & Tricks. CT Working Group

Methodologies for development of human health criteria and values for the lake Erie drainage basin.

Quan%ta%ve Tools for Benefit/Risk Op%miza%on in Medical Imaging MIRD CommiAee Pamphlet

Twelfth Annual Warren K. Sinclair Keynote Address

Epidemiologic Studies. The Carcinogenic Effects of Radiation: Experience from Recent Epidemiologic Studies. Types of Epidemiologic Studies

Estimating Testicular Cancer specific Mortality by Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Registry

UNSCEAR Recent and Future Programme of Work. Emil Bédi

Laurier D. GT CIPR, Paris, 29 Nov This presentation has neither been approved nor endorsed by the Main Commission of ICRP

Fukushima Emergency Planning Zones, Use of Potassium Iodide, Health Effects

Radiation Safety in the Workplace. v1.0

Ionizing Radiation. Alpha Particles CHAPTER 1

Outline. Outline 3/30/12. Second Cancers from. Radiotherapy Procedures. Stephen F. Kry, Ph.D., D.ABR.

A Probabilistic Approach for the Assessment of Internal Dose to Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Precursor Cells

EVALUATION OF INTERNAL CONTAMINATION LEVELS AFTER A RADIOLOGICAL DISPERSAL DEVICE USING PORTAL MONITORS. A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty

Estimation of Effective Doses for Radiation Cancer Risks on ISS, Lunar and Mars Missions with Space Radiation Measurements

Transcription:

APPENDIX G - Organ/Tissue Weighting Factors and Detriment/Risk Coefficients G.1 Introduction In January 1977, ICRP published ICRP-26. The ICRP established risk factors for different tissues that were based upon the estimated likelihood of inducing fatal malignant disease, nonstochastic changes, or substantial hereditary disorders expressed in live-born descendents. In November 1990, the ICRP revised the risk factors published in ICRP-26 and provided risk factors for additional organs that are listed in ICRP-60. G.2 Organ/Tissue Weighting Factors Table G-1 summarizes the organ/tissue weighting factors in ICRP-26. The ICRP-26 organ/tissue weighting factors are used in dose assessments. The organ/tissue weighting factors used in this report are those in Table G-1. Table G-1. Organ/Tissue Weighting Factors W t Organ/Tissue Σ W t 0.03 Bone surfaces, thyroid 0.06 0.12 Red bone marrow, lung 0.24 0.15 Breast 0.15 0.25 Gonads 0.25 0.30 Remainder 0.30 Reference: ICRP-26 G-1

Table G-2 summarizes the revised organ/tissue weighting factors in ICRP-60 and provides risk factors for additional organs. Table G-2. Organ/Tissue Weighting Factors W t Organ/Tissue Σ W t 0.01 Bone surface, skin 0.02 0.05 Bladder, breast, liver, esophagus, thyroid, 0.30 remainder 0.12 Red bone marrow, colon, lung, stomach 0.48 0.20 Gonads 0.20 Reference: ICRP-60 Whether you use ICRP-26 or ICRP-60, the final dose (CEDE) will be the same. (See Appendix J for comparison of the CEDE using ICRP-26 and ICRP-60 organ weighting factors.) The first step in the exposure assessment process is to estimate the quantity, mode, and chemical and physical form of the DU taken into the body. Once these factors have been established, organ dose equivalents and CEDEs may be calculated for the time periods of interest. G.3 Risk Coefficients The total detriment after low-dose and low-dose-rate (< 20 rad and < 10 rad/hr, respectively) exposure to ionizing radiation is the sum of the contributions due to fatal cancers, non-fatal cancers, and severe hereditary disorders weighted for life lost. The total detriment attributed to these stochastic effects is 7.3 x 10-4 /rem for the whole population and about 23 percent less for a working population of 20 years to 64 years of age or 5.6 x 10-4 /rem. Table G-3 provides nominal G-2

detriment/risk coefficients for stochastic radiation effects. The values also reflect the risk coefficients in ICRP-60 and NCRP Report No. 115. Table G-3. Nominal Detriment/Risk Coefficients for Stochastic Radiation Effects (10-4 /rem) Exposed Population Fatal Cancer Non Fatal Cancer Hereditary Disorders Total Detriment Working Population (20 to 64 yrs of age) 4.0 0.8 0.8 5.6 Whole Population (0 to 90 yrs of age) 5.0 1.0 1.3 7.3 References: ICRP-60 and NCRP Report No. 115 The nominal probability of radiation-induced fatal cancer in a lifetime is 4 x 10-4 /rem for a working population, which is about 80 percent of the total cancer risk for the general population, for doses < 20 rem and dose rates <10 rem/hr. The upper bound for the risk of fatal cancer for the working population would be 8 x 10-4 /rem and for the whole population 10 x 10-4 /rem. Therefore, the dose and dose rate effectiveness factor (DDREF) would be two 26. The risk coefficients may be used to estimate the probability of radiogenic cancer mortality or morbidity per unit intake for a given radionuclide for internal exposures or per unit dose for external exposures. Federal Guidance Report No. 13 provides risk coefficents for specific radionuclides. The ICRP-26 and NCRP-91 and the ICRP-60 and NCRP-115 established fatal risk coefficients. Table G-4 summarizes lifetime fatal cancer probability coefficients for specific organs. G-3

Table G-4. Summary of the Lifetime Mortality in the Whole Population from Specific Fatal Cancers after Exposure at Low Radiation Dose and Dose Rates Fatal Probability Coefficients (x 10-6 /rem) Organ ICRP-26 and NCRP-91 ICRP-60 and NCRP-115 Bladder --- 30 Bone Marrow 20 50 Bone Surface 5 5 Breast 25 20 Colon --- 85 Liver --- 15 Lung 20 85 Oesophagus --- 30 Ovary --- 10 Skin --- 2 Stomach --- 110 Thyroid 5 8 Remainder* 50 50 Total 125 500 *The composition of the remainder is quite different. The USEPA, using the linear, non-threshold dose-response model, estimates an average risk for a member of the general population in the U.S. of 5.75 x 10-4 fatal cancers per rem. For example, if 100,000 people, randomly chosen from the U.S. population, were each given a uniform dose of 0.1 rem to the entire body at a low-dose rate, then approximately five to six might die of cancer during their remaining lifetime due to that exposure. This is in addition to the estimated 20,000 (20 percent) fatal cancers that would occur in the same population from other causes. The USEPA has developed a method for estimating the lifetime excess total cancer risk per unit intake of uranium. Table G-5 summarizes the carcinogenic slope factors for the isotopes of uranium as found in the DU munitions. G-4

Table G-5. Radionuclide Carcinogenicity of Uranium in Units of Excess Risk/pCi and Risk/µg Radio- Isotope Class Inhalation Ingestion Risk/pCi (x 10-8 ) Risk/µg (x 10-9 ) Risk/pCi (x 10-11 ) Risk/µg (x 10-11 ) U-234 Y 0.00000084 0.052 0.00000266 0.166 U-235+D* Y 0.00026 0.00562 0.0094 0.0203 U-236 Y 0.000000396 0.00256 0.0000126 0.000817 U-238+D Y 1.24 4.16 6.19 2.08 Reference: EPA-540-R-97-036 *D = Decay Products A recent uncertainty analysis published by NCRP (NCRP Report No. 126) estimates that the actual risk of cancer from exposure of the entire body to low doses and dose rates of radiation could be between 4.8 times lower and 1.5 times higher (at the 90-percent confidence level) than the basic estimate of 5.75 x 10-4 fatal cancers per rem. G-5