BK-SE36 malaria vaccine candidate for young children

Similar documents
Malaria parasite vaccine development Strategies & Targets

Evidence review on the immunogenicity, efficacy/effectiveness and safety of typhoid conjugate vaccines

Ph.D. Thesis: Protective immune response in P.falciparum malaria 2011 CHAPTER I: Introduction. S.D. Lourembam 16

Of mice and men: practical approaches to malaria vaccine discovery and development

Progress and Challenges in Malaria Vaccines

Safety and Immunogenicity of a Parenterally Administered Rotavirus VP8 Subunit Vaccine in Healthy Adults

Review on vectored influenza vaccines. Sarah Gilbert Jenner Institute Oxford

Status of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine candidate

Randomized controlled trial of the Safety and Immunogenicity of recombinant PfAMA1-FVO[25. FVO[25-545] 545] in healthy adults in Bandiagara

Prophylactic HPV Vaccines. Margaret Stanley Department of Pathology Cambridge

The Challenge and Approach of Developing a Novel Anti-Nicotine Vaccine. Heather L. Davis, PhD Pfizer Vaccine Immunotherapeutics Ottawa, Canada

Update on Norovirus Vaccine Development

Ultrastructural Studies on Plasmodium vivax

Japan Agency for Research and Development (AMED); Its Missions and Challenges

Enhancing Immunogenicity of Recombinant Vaccines: Chemical Conjugation

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study No.: Title: Rationale: Study Period Objectives: Indication: Study Investigators/Centers: Research Methods: Data Source:

Development of Recombinant Pertussis Vaccines

Adjuvant technology transfer hub

Bangladesh: How to move from data to implementation. K. Zaman, MBBS, PhD Senior Scientist and Epidemiologist icddr,b

Development of a Recombinant Subunit Dengue Vaccine. Flavivirus Vaccination Fondation Mérieux December 8, 2010 Beth-Ann Coller

WP6 (Lead Partner RUG) Clinical Trial Program

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Cross-Reactivity to Field Isolates of Canine Influenza Virus by a Killed Canine Influenza Virus (H3N8, Iowa05) Vaccine

Understanding vaccine development

BRIEFING ON RTS,S/AS01 MALARIA VACCINE FOR THE SEPTEMBER 2012 MEETING OF MPAC

Update on the NIH tetravalent dengue vaccine. Beulah Sabundayo, PharmD, MPH Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Shingrix (zoster vaccine recombinant, adjuvanted) NEW PRODUCT SLIDESHOW

(Typhoid Vi Capsular Polysaccharide-Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine)

Update on production of plant-made influenza Virus-Like Particle (VLP) vaccine

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

~~at. I h~.e read the amendment$ and agree that the trial \\'ill 00 conducted acc.ording ro I:he procedure-~ descri bed,

Valneva s Lyme vaccine candidate VLA15

HAI and NAI as Correlates of Protection After Influenza Vaccination

Supplementary Information for: Plasmodium cynomolgi genome sequences provide insight into Plasmodium vivax and the monkey malaria clade

SAFETY, EFFICACY, AND USE OF INACTIVATED INFLUENZA VACCINE IN CHILDREN * Kathryn M. Edwards, MD RANDOMIZED TRIALS COMPARING INACTIVATED

Hepatitis E Vaccine Clinical Experience. Mrigendra P. Shrestha

AMA1-DiCo clinical trial phase Ia/ Ib: challenges and status

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

vaccination in Canada Bernard Duval, md, mph, frcpc Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec Québec, Canada Sevilla,

ESCMID Online Lecture Library

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

The Relationship between Anti-merozoite Antibodies and Incidence of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

GSK Cervical Cancer Vaccine:

Hepatitis B vaccination: a completed schedule enough to control HBV lifelong? MILAN, ITALY November 2011

9/10/2018. Principles of Vaccination. Immunity. Antigen. September 2018

H5N1 and H7 LAIV-IAV Prime-Boost Studies

p. 1 p. 7 p. 9 p.11 p.12 p.15 p.16 p.17 p.21 p.22 p.24 p.25 p.26 p.27 p.29 p.30 p.31 p.32 p.35

African American Men and Prostate Cancer Management Option for Clinical PROSPECT Trial Participation in an Immunotherapy Study

HPV Vaccination: Myths and Misconceptions

Key words:hepatitis B vaccine,anti-hbs,cellular immunity,side effect

GSK s Candidate Influenza A (H5N1) Virus Monovalent Vaccine

Lo screening come setting per la vaccinazione (nelle donne non vaccinate in età target e nelle donne trattate) Silvia Franceschi

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 23 September 2009

Clinical Trials of Pandemic Vaccines: Key Issues. John Treanor University of Rochester Rochester, NY

Jiraprapa Wipasa, 1,2 Huji Xu, 1,3 * Xueqin Liu, 1 Chakrit Hirunpetcharat, 4 Anthony Stowers, 5 and Michael F. Good 1 *

Development of Recombinant MERS-CoV Spike (S) Nanoparticle Vaccine

Protocol Synopsis. Administrative information

A Recombinant Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine Candidate Using DENV-2 Backbone

Kawasaki disease: Studies on etiology, treatment and long-term follow-up Tacke, C.E.A.

Reducing Babesia and Malaria Risks: Testing, Donor Selection, Inactivation. Susan L. Stramer PhD IPFA 23 rd Meeting May

Development of a Group A meningococcal conjugate vaccine for sub-saharan Africa: clinical trial results

Partnerships in action

The Future of Allergy Treatment Ultra-Fast Allergy Immunotherapy

The Future of Allergy Treatment Ultra-Fast Allergy Immunotherapy

Immune response and correlates of protection against Shigella

Immunity to Bodetella pertussis. Kingston Mills. Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

Dr Olga Pleguezuelos CSO and Project Manager at SEEK

Against intervention No recommendation Strong Conditional Conditional Strong. For intervention. High Moderate Low Very low

What is the Safety and Efficacy of Vaccinating the Male Gender to Prevent HPV Related Neoplastic Disorders in Both the Male and Female Genders

Safety and immunogenicity of a new Leishmania vaccine candidate ChAd63-KH

Canadian Immunization Conference 2018 Dec 4

Dengue and Zika vaccine development

Challenging the Current Malaria Vaccine Pipeline. Dr Odile LEROY Basel 6th December 2016

Allergen Immunotherapy in Asthma: Now and in the Future

Engineering an in vitro human immune system for rapid vaccine evaluation

Current and Future Prospects for the Treatment of Food Allergy

Could a combination of OPV & IPV accelerate wild type poliovirus eradication? Nicholas Grassly

Centers. Austria (2), Germany (5), Belgium (1), Netherlands (1), Denmark (1), Slovenia (1)

Malaria vaccines where are we now?

Can we improve the performance of live oral rotavirus vaccines?

Shabir A. Madhi. Global Overview of Maternal Immunisation

Introduction. In the past 15 years, several technological advancements have open new perspectives and applications in the field of vaccinology.

Ad35.CS.01 RTS,S/AS01 prime boost second generation malaria vaccine candidate

The Vaccine Formulation Laboratory

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Immunological characteristics of a C-terminal fragment of the Plasmodium falciparum blood-stage antigen Pf332

Long-term Immunogenicity Following Vaccination with a New, Live-attenuated Vaccine Against Japanese Encephalitis (JE-CV)

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON CLINICAL EVALUATION OF NEW VACCINES

Update on the dengue situation in the Western Pacific Region

A Global Overview of the Chikungunya Virus Problem

Target Design and Immunogenicity

ESCMID Online Lecture Library

An update on the Human Papillomavirus Vaccines. I have no financial conflicts of interest. Case 1. Objectives 10/26/2016

Shabir A Madhi Director: National Institute for Communicable Disease & Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit

Determining the size of a vaccine trial

Innate Immunity & Inflammation

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Transcription:

BK-SE36 malaria vaccine candidate for young children Toshihiro Horii, Ph.D RIMD, Osaka University 26 June. 2015, Save the date,tokyo, Japan

Structure of SERA5 protein and SE36 recombinant molecule 23 Serine repeat S H N 989 aa Trophozoite P120 989 a.a. 383 Ring P47 S-S P73 879 Schizont (Early) P47 (P25n + P25c) S-S P56 P18 P47 (P25n + P25c) P50 P6 P18 Invasion Merozoites Schizont (Rupture) Schizont (Mature) 17 382 SE47 193-225 SE36 S-S SE36 protein is derived from P47 of SERA5. Serine repeats in P47 protein was removed because of its hydrophobic nature. Recombinant protein is produced in E. coli from a synthetic gene. Horii et al., Vaccine (2010)

Correlation of anti-se36 antibody levels with parasitemia in residents from the Solomon Islands Anti-SE36 IgG Anti-MSP-1 IgG (OD) (OD) 1.0 1.5 Antibody level 0.5 Antibody level 1.0 0.5 0 0 (N=57) 0<30 (N=32) 30<100 (N=10) 100< (N=16) 0 0 (N=57) 0<30 (N=32) 30<100 (N=10) 100< (N=16) Number of parasites per 200 white blood cells (Horii et al.,2010, Parasitol Int. )

Sero-positive rate against N-terminal domain of SERA is very low in younger generations and increases with age (%) Proportion of high responders 100 80 60 40 20 0 SE36 (+) MSP-1 1-6 (+) ~10 11~15 16~20 21~30 31~40 41~ (n=12) (n=25) (n=19) (n=20) (n=13) (n=26) Age Groups (yr.) (Horii et al.,2010, Parasitol. Int. )

Function of SERA5 Central domain, P50, is essential for schizont rupture, although mechanism is unclear. N-terminal and C-terminal domain binds to vitronectin for host immune modulation (unpublished data). N-terminal and C-terminal domain on merozoite has an essential function in RBC invasion (unpublished data).

Clinical trials of BK-SE36 in Uganda BK-SE36: GMP grade SE36 protein formulated with aluminum hydroxide gel 2010 Apr Aug Phase Ib in Uganda: Stage 1: malaria- exposed Ugandan adults (21-40 years old) - No severe adverse events 2010 Sep 2011 Feb 2011 Mar Nov Stage 2: Follow-up Phase Ib in Uganda: Stage 2: malaria- exposed Ugandan children and young adults (6-20 years old) - No severe adverse events Palacpac et al., PLoS ONE May 2013, Vol. 8

Phase 1b: Trial design Stage 1 Stage 2 safety approval Stage1, 21-40 y: 56 subjects BK-SE36 Placebo 1 dose= 1.0mL (=100µg SE36 protein with 1mg aluminum hydroxide gel) Male Female Male Female Sero-negative 9 9 5 5 Sero-positive 9 9 5 5 Stage2, 6-20 y: 84 subjects 2 dose= 0.5 and 1.0mL BK-SE36 Placebo 0.5mL 1.0mL 0.5mL 1.0mL 6-10 y old 11 11 3 3 11-15 y old 11 11 3 3 16-20 y old 11 11 3 3

Stage1, 21-40 y Administration site reactions Sero-negative (n=18) BK-SE36 (1.0mL) Sero-positive (n=18) Induration 16 17 Pain/Tenderness Edema/Swelling Erthema/Redness 13 10 3 0 1 1 (Other: Hyperpigmentation) 0 2 Stage2, 6-20 y 0.5mL (n=33) BK-SE36 1.0mL (n=33) Induration 31 32 Safety and administration site reactions were similar to Phase 1a trial of this vaccine. Pain/Tenderness Edema/Swelling Erthema/Redness 19 18 0 0 1 4 (Other: Hyperemia/ Hyperpigmentation) 0 2

Immunogenicity of BK-SE36 Geometric mean fold increase in antibody titer 10 5 4 3 2 1 6-10 y old 11-15 y old 16-20 y old BK-SE36 1.0 ml 4.53 1.58 1.29 BK-SE36 0.5 ml 1.80 1.00 1.43 Placebo 0.1 1.22 0.90 0.91 Young children remarkably responded to BK-SE36.

Follow-up study 84 administered subjects New subjects BK-SE36 (0.5 ml): n = 33 BK-SE36 (1.0 ml): n = 33 Placebo (0.5 ml): n = 9 Placebo (1.0 ml): n = 9 + Age, gender and locality matched Control: n = 50 Monthly visits + Any time when sick Serum sampling Active surveillance: monthly Passive surveillance: any time when a subject felt sick Detection of malaria infection and parasitemia

Vaccine efficacy Days to the first appearance of malaria parasites 5000/µL + 37.5 in control and vaccine groups (0.5mL + 1.0 ml) Protective efficacy against parasitemias 5000/µL+fever BK-SE36= 72%, p=0.003 Palcpac et al.,2013 PLOS ONE

Definition of responders to BK-SE36 50 40 30 Fold increase in antibody titer 20 10 5 4 3 2 1 0.5 0.4 0.3 Responder (n=20) Non-responder (n=44) 1.92 Placebo (n=16) 0.2 0.1 BK-SE36 Placebo

10000 1000 100 10 1 Responder to BK-SE36 Before 1st Before 2nd Post SE207 SE211 SE223 SE230 SE234 SE236 SE256 SE260 SE262 SE267 SE268 Percentile of population with 2 fold increase in antibody titers according to age group of vaccine cohort Dose 6-10y. 11-15y. 16-20y. 100 μg 72.70% 27.30% 18.20% 50 μg 36.40% 0% 27.30%

10000 1000 100 10 1 Non-Responder to BK-SE36 Before 1st Before 2nd Post SE238 SE251 SE271 SE243 SE275 SE264 SE279 SE233 SE250 SE263 SE237 SE255

Analysis of boosting effect by natural infection Vaccine response Fold increase 1.92 : Responder < 1.92 : Non-responder Infection: 100 parasites / µl blood i) Infection was found between monthly visits. ii) Infection was found at a monthly visit. Before After Before After Next visit Titer increase Titer increase

Boosting effect after natural infection Antibody titer 10000 1000 100 10 10000 1000 100 10 10000 Responder Non-responder Placebo/Control Geometric mean of fold increase 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 P=0.0020** P<0.001*** P=0.42 1000 100 10 Before After 1 Responder Nonresponder Placebo/ Control

Antibody titer 1000 302.1 100 10 Changes in antibody titer in responders ( >1.92 increase of titer by vaccination) Infection = 0 Infection 1 Antibody titer 1000 100 10 22.4 97.3 75.0 62.8 59.4 Boosting (*2 infection) * * 1 1 Initial Final Initial Before After Final 21 days after 2nd admin. 9 subjects 11 subjects 365 days after 2nd admin. 21 days after 2nd admin. malaria infection malaria infection 365 days after 2nd admin. Subjects in the responder group without infection have higher antibody titers at initial (21 days post vaccination). The antibody titers of subjects with infection were significantly boosted by natural infection.

Correlation between vaccine response and re-infection 30 Parasitemia 100 (detection limit) Number of subjects 25 20 15 10 5 Number of infections 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Responder Non-responder Placebo/Control No. of infections 0 1 2 Risk of 2 infections Responder 9 9 2 0.100 ( 2/20) Non-responder 18 16 12 0.261 (12/46) 70% reduction Placebo/Control 25 19 22 0.333 (22/66) P=0.049* (by Fisher s exact test)

Nucleotide diversity (π) 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 ama1 csp msp1 SERA-SE36 serca + adsl (n=459) (n=485) (n=404) (n=445) (n=453) The nucleotide diversities (π ) of SE36 are lower than those of ama 1, msp1 and csp genes Tanabe et al. (2012) Vaccine 30: 1583-1593

Phase 1a trial (2005) malaria-naïve Japanese adults 1200 1100 1000 Group 1: 50 µg SE36 (0.5mL ) Group 2: 100 µg SE36 (1.0mL ) 1200 1100 1000 Anti-SE36 (IgG) titer 900 800 700 600 500 400 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 300 200 100 0 After 1 st administration After 2 nd After 3 rd After 1 st administration After 2 nd After 3 rd, placebo (saline) Horii et al., Parasitol Int. 2010

Phase Ib trial in Uganda; The highest response was observed in the youngest cohort. Proportion of subjects with >2-fold increase in antibody titers 100 80 60 40 20 0 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 Age (y) Younger age group of 0-5 years old would be more responsive to BK-SE36 vaccination Follow-up study revealed the efficacy of BK-SE36 against several malaria endpoints Vaccine responders had lower risk of re-infection and did show boosting effects by natural infection

Double blinded randomized Phase Ib clinical trial of BK-SE36 in Burkina Faso 2015 2016 Months 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 Cohort 1 (25-60 months) Weeks Dose 1 Dose 2 Booster Dose Cohort 2 (12-24 months) Dose 1 Dose 2 Booster Dose Treatment arms in each cohort 18 Vaccinees by intra-muscular 18 Vaccinees by subcutaneous 18 Placebo vaccinees (Synflorix) Endpoints Safety in young child Immunogenicity Exploratory efficacy

Development of Next Generation SE36 Malaria Vaccine For having a stronger immunogenicity. Formulation with innate immune adjuvant, CpG K3 ODN (TLR9 ligand adjuvant)

Comparison of vaccine induced antibody titers after 3 weeks of the second administration between BK-SE36 and BK-SE36/CpG in Phase Ia clinical trials of Japanese naïve adult (male) CpG 50 µg SE36/AHG (0.5mL) 100 µg SE36/AHG (1.0mL) - + - + 6000 6000 Anti-SE36 (IgG) titer 2000 1500 1000 2000 1500 1000 500 500 0 n=7 n=11 0 placebo (saline)

BK-SE36/AHG BK-SE36/AHG BK-SE36/AHG BK-SE36/AHG Phase Ia in Japan 20-35 y 2005 Phase Ib in Uganda 21-40 y, 6-20 y 2011-2013 Phase Ib in Burkina 1-5 y 2015-2016 Phase II/IIIb XXXX-XXXX Comparison of subclass, epitopes, protective ability and etc. of the induced IgG BK-SE36/CpG Phase Ia in Japan 20-35 y 2013-2015 BK-SE36/CpG Phase Ib XXXX-XXXX BK-SE36/CpG Phase II/IIIb XXXX-XXXX

Acknowledgement Department of Molecular Protozoology, RIMD, Osaka University: Nirianne M. Q. Palacpac, Ken J. Ishii, Nobuko Arisue, Takahiro Tougan, Sawako Itagaki, The Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University: Shigeharu Ueda, Ishikawa Toyokazu, Hiroki Shirai, Nahoko Suzuki, Takuya Okada, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka City University: Yoshio Hirota, Wakaba Fukushima, Kazuya Ito BK-SE36 Malaria Vaccine Working Group- MBL and LMC, Uganda: Thomas G. Egwang, AdokeYeka, Edward Ntege, Christopher Nsereko, Betty Balikagala, KaturoOsbert, Bernard Kanoi, OpioOtim William, Amina Ali Kheir, Adongo Faith Ayen, John Paul Bygamy, Godfrey Mujuzi Medical Center for Translational Research, Osaka University Hospital Akira Myoui, Sachiko Ezoe, Masanori Yagi Nirianne Palacpac

Gender Seroconversion Immunogenicity of BK-SE36 Phase 1b trial: malaria- exposed Ugandan adults Stage 1, 21-40 yr. Administration No. of subject s Antibody titer Geometric mean (95% CI) Before 1st administration 3 weeks after 2nd administration Female Negative Positive BK-SE36 9 22.0 (12.1-40.2) 34.5 (21.7-54.9) Placebo 5 36.8 (8.8-154.7) 26.3 (4.5-155.3) BK-SE36 9 469.3 (260.8-844.5) 496.7 (254.7-968.7) Placebo 5 495.7 (114.0-2155.5) 340.4 (67.7-1713.1) Negative Male Positive BK-SE36 9 35.9 (22.7-56.7) 59.1 (44.8-77.8) Placebo 5 24.4 (13.7-43.4) 29.8 (9.0-98.6) BK-SE36 9 465.4 (207.7-1042.9) 403.9 (205.7-792.8) Placebo 5 237.5 (142.8-395.2) 333.1 (145.9-760.4) In healthy adults, largest increase in mean anti-se36 protein antibody were observed in subjects with low baseline antibody titers to SE36. Palacpac et al., PLoS ONE May 2013, Vol. 8

Immunogenicity of BK-SE36 Phase 1b trial: malaria- exposed Ugandan children and young adults Stage 2, 6-20 yr. Antibody titer Geometric mean (95% CI) Age group Administration No. of subjects Before 1st administration 3 weeks after 2nd administration 6-10 y old 11-15 y old 16-20 y old BK-SE36 1.0 ml 11 25.3 (9.0-71.1) 124.7 (46.8-332.6) BK-SE36 0.5 ml 11 26.0 (12.8-52.6) 48.0 (27.4-84.3) BK-SE36 1.0 ml 11 81.9 (35.3-189.9) 100.6 (42.0-240.6) BK-SE36 0.5 ml 11 77.5 (42.1-142.6) 63.5 (36.6-110.2) BK-SE36 1.0 ml 11 167.8 (60.1-468.5) 204.9 (79.0-531.4) BK-SE36 0.5 ml 11 133.5 (44.7-398.5) 156.2 (56.6-431.0) 6-20 y old Placebo 18 80.8 (40.6-160.7) 53.8 (30.2-94.9) Antibody titer is relative to 5,000 units assingd for high titer pooled Ugandan serum Palacpac et al., PLoS ONE May 2013, Vol. 8