GASTRIC MEASURE SPECIFICATIONS

Similar documents
OVARY MEASURE SPECIFICATIONS

Cancer Programs Practice Profile Reports (CP 3 R) Rapid Quality Reporting System (RQRS)

CERVIX MEASURE SPECIFICATIONS

KIDNEY MEASURE SPECIFICATIONS

RECTAL MEASURE SPECIFICATIONS

Cancer Programs Practice Profile Reports (CP 3 R) Rapid Quality Reporting System (RQRS)

Commission on Cancer Updates

The New CP 3 R Application And Revisions To Standard 4.6 Integration Of The NCDB With The Accreditation Process

Tools, Reports, and Resources

Please submit all questions concerning webinar content through the Q&A panel. Reminder:

Update of Cancer Programs. Scott H. Kurtzman, MD FACS

2015 Public Outcomes Report Cancer Program Practice Profile Reports 2013 Breast and Colon Cancer

NCDB Vendor Webinar: NCDB Call for Data January 2018 and Upcoming RQRS Revisions

CANCER REPORTING IN CALIFORNIA: ABSTRACTING AND CODING PROCEDURES California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume I

COMMISSION ON CANCER 2013 Cancer Program Practice Profile Reports (CP 3 R)

RQRS: From Idea to Reality

Who What When Where Why. Case Finding 5 W s. NAACCR Webinar Series. Presented by: Joyce L. Jones, CTR Professional Registry Services, LLC

ANNUAL REPORT. Figure 2 displays the distribution of the number of these diagnoses in 2013 by age (along the X axis) and by gender.

Quality Measures: How we develop them and the science behind it

General Information. Please silence cell phones. Locations Restrooms to the left of the ballroom, or to your right by the elevators

Melanoma Quality Reporting

Public Reporting of Outcomes 2016

NUMERATOR: Reports that include the pt category, the pn category and the histologic grade

NPQR Quality Payment Program (QPP) Measures 21_18247_LS.

Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements

Quality ID #250 (NQF 1853): Radical Prostatectomy Pathology Reporting National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Quality ID #249 (NQF 1854): Barrett s Esophagus National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

College of American Pathologists. Pathology Performance Measures included in CMS 2012 PQRS

2018 IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE: WHAT S NEW IN STAGING FOR 2018?

Exceptional cancer care, close to home.

NUMERATOR: Reports that include the pt category, the pn category and the histologic grade

AJCC TNM STAGING UPDATES ARE YOU READY FOR TNM?

Measure #250 (NQF 1853): Radical Prostatectomy Pathology Reporting National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clincial Care

Outline. How to Use the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7 th ed. 7/9/2015 FCDS ANNUAL CONFERENCE ST PETERSBURG, FLORIDA JULY 30, 2015.

Quiz Adenocarcinoma of the distal stomach has been increasing in the last 20 years. a. True b. False

Reporting of Cancer Stage Information by Acute Care Hospitals in Ontario

Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements

Boot Camp /5/15

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process

The Commission on Cancer: Reengineering the National Cancer Data Base

2016 CANCER PROGRAM REPORT. Bay Medical Sacred Heart Health System 615 North Bonita Avenue Panama City, FL

Shore Medical Center Site-Specific Study: Colorectal Cancer 2013

Greater Baltimore Medical Center Sandra & Malcolm Berman Cancer Institute

Alternate Name Item # Length Source of Standard Column # Alternate Name Item # Length Source of Standard Column #

INTRODUCTION TO CANCER STAGING

Financial Disclosure. Learning Objectives. Review and Impact of the NCDB PUF. Moderator: Sandra Wong, MD, MS, FACS, FASCO

Surgical Problems in Proximal GI Cancer Management Cardia Tumours Question #1: What are cardia tumours?

SAM PROVIDER TOOLKIT

2010 Cancer Data Collection Updates: Standards Volume II, Introduction. What s New for 2010

Making the Most of Your Cancer Registry

Quality ID #249 (NQF 1854): Barrett s Esophagus National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

FORDS to STORE: The Evolution of Cancer Registry Coding Frederick L. Greene, MD FACS Medical Director, Cancer Data Services Levine Cancer Institute

Kyle L. Ziegler, CTR. California Cancer Registry U.C. Davis Health System

Evaluation of Abstracting: Cancers Diagnosed in MCSS Quality Control Report 2005:2. Elaine N. Collins, M.A., R.H.I.A., C.T.R

Exceptional cancer care, close to home.

Imaging in gastric cancer

Abstracting and Coding Boot Camp: Cancer Case Scenarios

Quality ID #264: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Invasive Breast Cancer National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

EXPLORING THE INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF REGISTRY DATA ON STAGE OF DISEASE AT DIAGNOSIS

4/10/2018. SEER EOD and Summary Stage. Overview KCR 2018 SPRING TRAINING. What is SEER EOD? Ambiguous Terminology General Guidelines

Standard 4.6: The Importance of CAP Protocols and Understanding Synoptic Reporting

GREATER BALTIMORE MEDICAL CENTER SANDRA & MALCOLM BERMAN CANCER INSTITUTE

Requirements for Abstracted Text

Surgical Management of Metastatic Colon Cancer: analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database

Colorectal Cancer at the MemorialCare Todd Cancer Institute at Long Beach Memorial

1. Laterality, Primary Site E:Lateral & Site conflict Laterality (295) = 0 _ 2 Primary Site (291) = C711 Date of Diagnosis (283) =

5/8/2014. AJCC Stage Introduction and General Rules. Acknowledgements* Introduction. Melissa Pearson, CTR North Carolina Central Cancer Registry

Adenocarcinoma of gastro-esophageal junction - Case report

Ritu Nayar, MD Professor and Vice Chair of Pathology Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL

Compassionate, team-driven cancer care CLOSE TO HOME.

LANDMARK MEDICAL CENTER CANCER PROGRAM YEAR IN REVIEW 2013

Introduction and Application of Taiwan Cancer Registry Database

Outcomes Q&A NAACCR Webinar Series July 7, 2016

North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Inc. (NAACCR) What You Need to Know for Version 1.1

NAACCR Webinar Series 1

Measure Specifications Measure Description

PAPER. Effect of Hospital Type and Volume on Lymph Node Evaluation for Gastric and Pancreatic Cancer

LUNG CANCER Includes Invasive and Primary Cancers Only; Does Not Include Carcinoma In Situ or Metastatic Cancer

Boot Camp /5/15

Colorectal Cancer: With a Focus on Colon Cancer

Comparative Analysis of Stage and Other Prognostic Factors Among Urethral, Ureteral, and Renal Pelvis Malignant Tumors

AJCC TNM 6 th Edition Staging Input Data Dictionary

Q&A Session NAACCR Webinar Series Collecting Cancer Data: Pancreas January 05, 2012

Cancer Center Dashboard

Validation of the T descriptor in the new 8th TNM classification for non-small cell lung cancer

Measure #397: Melanoma Reporting National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Measure #425: Photodocumentation of Cecal Intubation National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Quality ID #343: Screening Colonoscopy Adenoma Detection Rate National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Coding Pitfalls 9/11/14

AJCC 7th Edition Handbook Errata as of 9/21/10

Q: How do you clinically code the N if the nodes are stated to be positive on mammogram/us or other imaging? No biopsy of nodes was done.

NUMERATOR: Reports that include the pt category, the pn category and the histologic grade

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process

Differential lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer: associated factors and effect on survival

American College of Surgeons 2014 Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons.

Neoplasms of the Colon and of the Rectum

Intervention(s) Results primary outcome Critical appraisal of review quality

NUMERATOR: Reports that include the pt category, the pn category and the histologic grade

Cancer Registrars: Beyond the Abstract

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Transcription:

Cancer Programs Practice Profile Reports (CP 3 R) GASTRIC MEASURE SPECIFICATIONS Introduction The Commission on Cancer s (CoC) National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) staff has undertaken an effort to improve the transparency with which the measures in the CP 3 R and RQRS reporting systems are calculated. To this end, for each measure, supporting information, three tables and a flow-diagram are provided: The measure type, clinical rationale and references are provided. The Measure Item List table provides each cancer registy data item used in the assessment of the indicated measure. This includes the FORDS data item name, the North American Association of Central Cancer Registry (NAACCR) item number and a brief description of each item. The Case Eligibility Criteria table itemizes the steps taken to determine whether cases belong in the measure denominator for cases diagnosed 2010 and later. Each condition is described and is accompanied by the data item and code values used in the assesment. The Numerator Criteria table illustrates how cases are assessed to determine whether they qualify for the numerator of the measure, in other words are concordant for the standard of care. A flow-diagram is provided to illustrate the steps through which cases pass as they are evaluted for the indicated measure. The number appearing in each flow-diagram element corresponds to the assessment criteria appearing in the Case Eligibility Criteria and Numerator Criteria tables. Note: Newly adopted measures will be integrated into CP 3 R prior to their release in RQRS. Measure Definitions This document provides specifications for the following measures: Measure At least 15 regional lymph nodes are removed and pathologically examined for resected gastric cancer Measure Abbreviation G15RLN Measure Type Quality Improvement Measure Type There are several types of measures approved by the CoC. Evidence-based measures or accountability measures promote improvements in care delivery and are the highest standard for measurement. These measures demonstrate provider accountability, influence payment for services and promote transparency. The quality improvement measure function is to monitor the need for quality improvement or remediation. Generally, these measures are for individual program use. Surveillance measures are used to identify the status quo, generate information for decision making, and/or to monitor patterns and trends of care. The following Table summarizes the purposes and use of these measures: Released March 2015 1

Measure Type Accountability Quality Improvement Surveillance Measure definition and use High level of evidence supports the measure, including multiple randomized control trials. These measures can be used for such purposes as public reporting, payment incentive programs, and the selection of providers by consumers, health plans, or purchasers. Evidence from experimental studies, not randomized control trials supports the measure. These are intended for internal monitoring of performance within an organization. Limited evidence exist that supports the measure or the measure is used for informative purposes to accredited programs. These measures can be used for to identify the status quo as well as monitor patterns and trends of care in order to guide decision-making and resource allocation. Released March 2015 2

G15RLN - Gastric Measure: At least 15 regional lymph nodes are removed and pathologically examined for resected gastric cancer Measure Type: Quality Improvement Clinical Rationale: Evidence of improved overall survival outcomes with improved lymphadenectomy References: 1. Al-Refaie, WB, Gay, G., Virnig, BA, Tseng, JF, Stewart, A, Vickers, SM, Tuttle, TM, and Feig, BW. Variations in Gastric Cancer Care. Cancer 2010: 465-475. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24772 2. Baxter NN, Tuttle TM. Inadequacy of lymph node staging in gastric cancer patients: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:981-987. 3. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Stewart AK, et al. Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1310-1317. 3

Note: This measure applies to cases diagnosed in 2010 and later. Measure Item List FORDS Data Item NAACCR # Description Primary Site 400 Anatomic Site of origin of the cancer CS Site Specific Factor 25 2879 CS Site Specific Factor 25 is used along with primary site to identify whether the cancer originated in the stomach or the esophagus Sex 220 Sex of patient Age at Diagnosis 230 Age of patient at diagnosis Sequence Number 560 Sequence of malignant and nonmalignant neoplasms over the lifetime Histology 522 Microscopic or cellular anatomy of the cancer Behavior Code 523 Neoplastic behavior of the cancer Class of Case 610 Indicates the reporting facility s role in managing the cancer Clinical M 960 AJCC Clinical M Pathologic M 900 AJCC Pathologic M Clinical Stage Group 970 AJCC Clinical Stage Group Pathologic Stage Group 910 AJCC Pathologic Stage Group Surgical Procedure of the Primary Site at this facility 670 Surgical procedure of the primary site performed at this facility Regional Lymph Nodes Examined 830 Total number of regional lymph nodes that were removed and examined Regional Lymph Nodes Positive 820 Total number of regional lymph nodes examined and found to contain metastases 4

Diagram Reference Case Eligibility Criteria Assessment FORDS Item FORDS Codes 1 Primary Site Gastric (excluding GE Junction (160); and excluding Fundus (161) and Body (162) if <=5 cm from Esophagogastric Junction and crossing the esophagogastric junction) Primary Site CS Site Specific Factor 25 C163, C164, C165, C166, C168, C169 OR C161, C162 and CS Site Specific Factor 25= 000, 030, 981, 999 Adult patient over the age of 17 at 2 diagnosis Age at Diagnosis 018-120 Any Sequence of malignant 3 neoplasm Sequence Number 00 59, 99 4 Invasive or in situ tumors Behavior Code 2, 3 5 All or part of the first course of treatment was performed at the reporting facility Class of Case 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 21, or 22 6 Male or female Sex 1, 2 Select adenocarcinomas 8140-8240, 8255-8576 from stageable stomach ranges: 7 Gastric Adenocarcinoma Histology 8000-8152, 8154-8231, 8243-8245, 8247-8248, 8250-8576, 8940-8950, 8980-8990 Clinical M (c1,p1) 8 Exclude Stage IV, any M+ (clinical or pathological). Pathologic M Clinical Stage Group (c1,p1) 4 9 Gastric Resection Cases at this Facility Pathologic Stage Group Surgical Procedure of the Primary Site at this facility 4 30-80 5

Numerator Criteria Diagram Reference Assessment FORDS Item FORDS Codes 10 At least 15 regional lymph nodes are removed and pathologically examined for gastric resections at this facility. Regional Lymph Nodes Examined Regional Lymph Nodes Positive Regional Lymph Nodes Examined = 15-90 AND Regional Lymph Nodes Examined Regional Lymph Nodes Positive Note: 1) Sept 2015 CP3R release updates: a. Allow behavior code 2. 2) August 2016 updates: a. NAACCRv16, add c or p prefix to TNM. 3) June 2017 updates: a. Diagram step 4 correction. Doc only. 6

7