Fracture REduction Evaluation (FREE) Study

Similar documents
KYPHON Balloon Kyphoplasty

Outline Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: Who, What, and When

Outline. Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty. Epidemiology. Identifying Vertebral Fractures. Page 1

Outline Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: Who, What, and When

YOUR SUDDEN BACK PAIN MAY BE A FRACTURE

Vertebral Body Augmentation

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE. Multiple Technology Appraisal (MTA)

Vertebral Augmentation for Compression Fractures. Scott Magnuson, MD Pain Management of North Idaho, PLLC

Balloon Kyphoplasty for Treatment of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Name of Policy: Percutaneous Vertebroplasty, Kyphoplasty, Mechanical Vertebral Augmentation and Sacroplasty

This supplement contains the following items:

Kyphoplasty patient-centered outcomes via questionnaire

Quality of life results of balloon kyphoplasty versus non surgical management for osteoporotic vertebral fractures in Germany

Balloon Kyphoplasty. An Evidence-Based Analysis. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series 2004; Vol. 4, No. 12. December 2004

Key Words: kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, compression fracture, patient satisfaction

TREAT BONE TUMORS WITH REPRODUCIBLE PRECISION

TREAT SPINAL METASTASES WITH REPRODUCIBLE PRECISION

Clinical Data and Efficacy in the Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures. Author Affiliation

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Sacroplasty

Cement augmentation in spinal tumors: a systematic review comparing vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty

PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY AND KYPHOPLASTY

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Sacroplasty

PERCUTANEOUS BALLOON KYPHOPLASTY, RADIOFREQUENCY KYPHOPLASTY, AND MECHANICAL VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE. Multiple Technology Appraisal (MTA)

Articles. Funding Medtronic Spine LLC.

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Vertebral Body Compression Fracture Treatment Options

B3D-MC-GHCY Clinical Study Report Synopsis Page 1Page GHCY Synopsis LY

Metastatic Spinal Disease

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE

Original Policy Date

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty, Kyphoplasty, Sacroplasty, and Coccygeoplasty

Cost utility analysis of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures in the United States

Discussion Points 10/17/16. Spine Pain is Ubiquitous. Interventional Pain Management

FEP Medical Policy Manual

ProDisc-L Total Disc Replacement. IDE Clinical Study.

Unprecedented Control. Radiofrequency-Targeted Vertebral Augmentation (RF-TVA ) with the StabiliT Vertebral Augmentation System

Interventional Pain Management

Section: Surgery Last Reviewed Date: May Policy No: 107 Effective Date: June 1, 2016

Outcomes of Balloon Kyphoplasty and Its Use in Pathological Vertebral Compression Fractures; a Single Centre Experience

28/03/2017. Content. Non-Pharmacological Treatments for Osteoporosis. Managing Pain from A Vertebral Fracture. Traditional Conservative Approach

Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty

Evidence Table. Study Type: Randomized controlled trial. Study Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the X-Stop interspinous implant.

Supplementary Appendix

Populations Interventions Comparators Outcomes Individuals: With osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Treatment of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Jonas Ranstam 1*, Aleksandra Turkiewicz 1, Steven Boonen 2, Jan Van Meirhaeghe 3, Leonard Bastian 4 and Douglas Wardlaw 5.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lateral Interbody Fusion Stratified by Preoperative Diagnosis

Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial

Osteoporosis, the most common metabolic. Redo Kyphoplasty with Vertebroplasty Technique: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Osteoporosis and Spinal Fractures

Oklahoma Spine & Brain Institute is Proud to Introduce Michael Thambuswamy, MD, MBA

Vertebroplasty/Kyphoplasty

Cement augmentation for vertebral fractures in patients with multiple myeloma

Vertebroplasty has been widely and successfully used in the

PBLD Table #8. Pediatric Vertebral Body Compression Fracture: Diagnosis and Therapeutic Options for Severe Pain

Appendix. International coding of diseases according to ICD 10-GM Reimbursement codes per country (in alphabetical order)

Posterior instrumentation after a failed balloon kyphoplasty in the thoracolumbar junction: a case report

ACCESS + NAVIGATION + STABILIZATION

Vertebral augmentation: report of the Standards and Guidelines Committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty

Balloon Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty for Vertebral Compression Fractures

Surgical and orthotic possibilities of bone tumour pain management

CLINICAL GUIDELINES. Primary Care Guideline Summary Lumbar Spine Thomas J. Gilbert M.D., M.P.P. 3/17/15 revision

University of Groningen. Thoracolumbar spinal fractures Leferink, Vincentius Johannes Maria

Samir Lapsiwala, MD. Fort Worth Brain and Spine Institute Fort Worth Brain and Spine Institute GEN-SP-32

Prevention of PJF: Surgical Strategies to Reduce PJF. Robert Hart, MD Professor OHSU Orthopaedics Portland OR. Conflicts

Protocol. Percutaneous Balloon Kyphoplasty and Mechanical Vertebral Augmentation

Vertebroplasty has been widely accepted as an effective

Kyphosis: Causes, Consequences. and Treatments. Disclosures. Roadmap. Sagittal Plane Alignment. None

New Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Machines (idxa) and Vertebral Fracture Assessment

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty-Induced Adjacent Vertebral Compression Fracture. Ki Seong Eom, MD, PhD, and Tae Young Kim, MD, PhD

Cruciform anterior spinal hyperextension (CASH) brace with round anterior chest pads.

2016 OPAM Mid-Year Educational Conference, sponsored by AOCOPM Thursday, March 10, 2016 C-1

The surgical treatment of metastatic disease of the spine

Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty

Pulmonary Cement Embolism in a Multiple Myeloma Patient Following Vertebroplasty: A Case Report

ProDisc-L Total Disc Replacement. IDE Clinical Study

Efficacy of Percutaneous Kyphoplasty in Treating Osteoporotic Multithoracolumbar Vertebral Compression Fractures

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Multiple Technology Appraisal (MTA)

ASJ. Quality of Life in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures. Asian Spine Journal. Introduction

Managing Bone Pain in Metastatic Disease. Rachel Schacht PA-C Medical Oncology and Hematology Associates Presented on 11/2/2018

Comparison of Balloon Kyphoplasty with the New Kiva VCF System for the Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures

Annotations Part III Vertebral Fracture Initiative. International Osteoporosis Foundation March 2011

Kyphoplasty is currently a treatment option for. Safety and efficacy of balloon kyphoplasty at 4 or more levels in a single anesthetic session

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lateral Interbody Fusion Stratified by Preoperative Diagnosis

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Delayed surgery in neurologically intact patients affected by thoraco-lumbar junction burst fractures: to reduce pain and improve quality of life

Balloon kyphoplasty is now considered as minimally invasive

Module 1: Basic Comprehensive Course

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Comparison of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for complications

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) consists of the percutaneous

Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine

Control. Control Through VISCOSITY Control Through DELIVERY Control Through SIMPLICITY

Bone Cement-Augmented Percutaneous Short Segment Fixation : An Effective Treatment for Kummell s Disease?

Summary of Selected Spinal Cord Stimulation Studies

Vertebral puncture reduces vertebral fracture-associated pain-do osteoplastic procedures qualify as successful placebo interventions?

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Transcription:

Fracture REduction Evaluation (FREE) Study Efficacy and Safety of Balloon Kyphoplasty Compared with Non-surgical Care for Vertebral Compression Fracture (FREE): A Randomised Controlled Trial Wardlaw Lancet 2009 Balloon Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Acute Vertebral Compression Fractures: 2 year Results from a Randomized Trial Boonen JBMR 2011 [speaker] [title] PMD006367-1.0 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00211211

Level I Clinical Evidence Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Kyphon Balloon Kyphoplasty (BKP) vs. Non-surgical Management (NSM) Largest RCT for any vertebral augmentation procedure Multicenter, Multinational 21 European sites, 8 countries Large Cohort, Randomized n = 300 patients: 149 Balloon Kyphoplasty, 151 Non-surgical Management 24-month Follow-up 2-year results (f/u 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months) Multiple Validated Outcome Measures QOL, back function, activity days, back pain, analgesic usage, patient satisfaction Independent Statistical & Radiographic Assessment 2 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Major Inclusion Criteria 1 to 3 VCFs between T5 - L5 At least one with edema on MRI At least one with 15% height loss Fractures due to osteoporosis (primary or secondary), multiple myeloma or osteolytic metastatic tumors Back pain score 4 on VAS (0-10) Major Exclusion Criteria Fractures 3 months old Previous vertebroplasty Neurological deficit Radicular pain Spinal cord compression Canal narrowing History of disabling back pain, not caused by VCFs Dementia Unable to walk prior to fracture 3 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Study Design Fracture 3 months 300 Patients Screening MRI Baseline Stratified for: Gender Etiology of fracture Bisphosphonate use Corticosteroid use Randomization Balloon Kyphoplasty (BKP) n = 149 Images: courtesy of Dr J Van Meirhaeghe 149 138 134 131 124 Start Treatment 5-10 days 1 month 3 month 6 month 12 month 151 128 117 115 111 120 24 month 112 Non-surgical Care (Control) n = 151 Treatment according to hospital protocol - Pain medication - Bed rest - Bracing - Physiotherapy - Rehabilitation programs - Walking aids 4 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Study Design: Endpoints Primary SF-36 PCS (Physical Component Summary) at 1 month (scale 0 100) Validated global QOL measure weighted on physical abilities Secondary Quality of Life (QOL) SF-36 subscales (scale 0 100) EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Questionnaire (scale 0 1) Back Function & Mobility Roland-Morris Disability (0 24) Restricted activity days and bed rest due to back pain in the past 2 weeks Back Pain: visual-analogue scale (0 10) Pain medication use (narcotics & opioids) Patient satisfaction (Likert Scale, 1 20) Device- & procedure-related safety Radiograph assessments and economic data collected but not reported in 12mo or 24mo publications 5 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Baseline Demographics & Characteristics BKP (n = 149) NSM (n = 151) Age: years Mean (SD) 72.2 (± 9.3) 74.1 (± 9.4) Age Range: years 44.5 95.2 52.8 89.1 Female n (%) 115 (77%) 117 (77%) Underlying cause of Fracture Primary Osteoporosis n (%) 145 (97%) 143 (95%) Secondary Osteoporosis (steroids) n (%) 2 (1.3%) 6 (4.0%) Multiple myeloma / metastatic n (%) 2 (1.3%) 2 (1.3%) Bisphosphonate use (at baseline) n (%) 49 (33%) 49 (32%) 12 months use n (%) 13 (9%) 16 (11%) Glucocorticoid use n (%) 26 (17%) 26 (17%) Baseline Fractures 1 n (%) 100 (67%) 115 (76%) 2 n (%) 34 (23%) 28 (19%) 3 n (%) 15 (10%)* 8 (5%) Baseline Fracture Location n = 214 n = 195 Thoracic (T5-T9) n (%) 49 (23%) 41 (21%) Thoracolumbar Junction (T10-L2) n (%) 127 (59%) 130 (67%) Lumbar (L3-L5) n (%) 38 (18%) 24 (12%) Groups similar at baseline with the exception of multiple fractures * One patient had a fourth index fracture identified between screening and planned surgery 6 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Baseline Demographics & Characteristics BKP NSM Fracture grade (Genant*) n = 149 n = 151 grade 2 (>25% deformity) (%) 63% 77% grade 3 (>40% deformity) (%) 27% 31% Hip T-score n = 122 n = 121 Normal ( -1.0) n (%) 30 (25%) 18 (15%) Osteopenic (< -1.0 to -2.5) n (%) 58 (48%) 61 (50%) Osteoporotic (< -2.5) n (%) 34 (28%) 42 (35%) Spine T-score n = 135 n = 128 Normal ( -1.0) n (%) 28 (21%) 20 (16%) Osteopenic (< -1.0 to -2.5) n (%) 54 (40%) 57 (45%) Osteoporotic (< -2.5) n (%) 53 (39%) 51 (40%) Groups similar at baseline. * Genant HK, et al. Vertebral Fracture Assessment Using a Semiquantitative Technique. J Bone Miner Res. 1993;8(9):1137-48. 7 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Group Means and 95% CI Primary Endpoint: SF-36 PCS at 1 Month SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score Quality of life weighted on physical abilities 40 35 30 25 p=0.35 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 BKP treatment is superior to NSM when measured by SF-36 PCS (primary endpoint) Only BKP saw a statistical (p<0.0001) and clinical (>3.5 MCID) improvement 20 15 10 3.5 point change from baseline needed for clinical significance or MCID (Minimally Clinically Important Difference) Copay Spine J 2008 5 BKP 0 Baseline 1 Month NSM (control) 8 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Quality of Life SF-36 Physical component summary (PCS) score Quality of life weighted on physical abilities SF-36 PCS Score (mean and 95% CI) 100 50 40 30 20 10 0 p=0.001* p=0.096 p=0.13 Faster Improvement (Treatment x Visit p<0.0001) 0 6 12 18 24 Follow-up (Months) Treatment p=0.0001 BKP NSM (control) BKP provided: Better Treatment Effect Over 2 years On average 3.24 points greater across 24 mo Better Average Scores Statistically significantly* higher at 1, 3 and 6 mo Faster Improvement Statistically significantly greater efficacy at the early time points Near Return to Norm Swedish aged-matched norm PCS for females 75 years without VCF (~37) Sullivan SF-36 Hälsoenkät 2002 9 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Quality of Life EQ-5D (Global Health Outcome) Total EQ-5D (means and 95% CI) 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 p=0.002* p=0.0009* p=0.006* p=0.040* 0 6 12 18 24 Follow -up (m onths) Treatment p<0.0001 BKP NSM (control) BKP provided: Better Treatment Effect Over 2 years On average 0.12 points greater across 24 mo Better Average Scores Statistically significantly* higher at ALL time points BKP significantly better than NSM: Statistically higher QALY (Quality-Adjusted Life Years) in Year 1 (25.9%; p=0.007) and Year 2 (15.4%; p=0.029) 10 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Mobility Roland-Morris Score (mean and 95% CI) Roland Morris Disability Assessment of Back Function 24 20 16 12 8 4 0 Faster Improvement (Treatment x Visit ) Treatment p<0.0001 BKP p=0.059 NSM (control) 0 6 12 18 24 Follow-up (months) BKP provided: Better Treatment Effect Over 2 years On average -3.01 point difference across 24 mo Better Average Scores Statistically significantly* higher at 1, 3, 6 and 12 mo Faster Improvement Statistically significantly* greater efficacy at the early time points 11 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Reduced Activity (Days) (mean and 95% CI) Mobility Limited Activity Days 14 12 10 8 Faster Improvement (Treatment x Visit ) BKP NSM (control) Treatment p<0.0001 BKP provided: Better Treatment Effect Over 2 years On average -2.62-day difference over 24 mo Over 2 years, BKP patients had an estimated 136 more days (4.5 mo) of activity than NSM 6 4 2 0 p=0.0008* p=0.006* p=0.12 0 6 12 18 24 Follow-up (months) Better Average Scores Statistically significantly* higher at 1, 3, 6 and 12 mo Faster Improvement Statistically significantly* greater efficacy at the early time points Assessment of limited activity days (within 2 weeks) 12 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Pain Relief Back Pain & Bodily Pain BKP provided: Back Pain Score (mean and 95% CI) 10 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 p=0.001* BKP NSM (control) Treatment p<0.0001 p=0.006* Better Treatment Effect Over 2 years On average 1.49 points greater reduction over 24 mo Better Average Scores Statistically significantly*better back pain relief at ALL time points (1 wk 24 mo) ~30% or greater difference throughout the 24 months 1 0 (1wk) (1mo) 0 6 12 18 24 Follow-up (Months) 10-point back pain score (0=no pain, 10=max) SF-36 Bodily Pain Score (1 24) Reduced Bodily Pain Significantly reduced SF-36 Bodily Pain at all time points (9.75 points better than NSM over 24 mo; p<0.0001) 13 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Pain Medication & Patient Satisfaction BKP Patients Used Significantly Fewer Pain Meds Percent of patients requiring meds for fracture pain BKP NSM Any analgesics Baseline 94% 92% Narcotics (codeine or stronger) 12 months 52% 68% Baseline 73% 67% 6 months 30% 43% p = 0.01 p = 0.04 BKP Patients More Satisfied* Patients were more satisfied with BKP over 24 months (treatment effect 3.09 points, 95% CI 2.26-3.92, p<0.0001) Difference was significant at ALL time points including 24 months (24mo = 2.31 points difference, 95% CI 1.19-3.43, p<0.0001) * Likert Patient Satisfaction (Scale 1 20) 14 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Subsequent Fracture Outcomes No Difference BKP NSM P-value Patients with New Radiographic VCFs, n (%)* 0-3 months All subsequent 27/123 (22%) 27/100 (27%) 0.43 0-12 months All subsequent 45/118 (38%) 38/99 (38%) 1.00 All subsequent 56/118 (48%) 45/102 (44%) 0.68 0-24 months Adjacent 28/118 (24%) 17/102 (17%) 0.24 Worsening Index 5/118 (4%) 11/102 (11%) 0.07 Patients with New Clinical VCFs, n (%) VCFs 31/149 (21%) 27/151 (18%) 0.52 0-24 months Considered possibly device-related 11/149 (7%) N/A - Non-VCFs 20/149 (13%) 15/151 (10%) 0.35 Index = acute fractures identified at baseline to be treated according to randomization assignment (BKP or NSM). Worsening Index = any patient with an index fracture that worsened by at least one Genant grade. All Subsequent = patient with any new fracture including a worsening index or new fracture located adjacent to or remote from an index fracture. Adjacent = any patient with a new fracture located adjacent to an index fracture. * Radiographic fractures identified by core lab. Clinical fractures identified by investigators as adverse events MedDRA coded to musculoskeletal disorders. Considered to be possibly or probably related by the local investigator. Non-vertebral fractures include all other fractures (e.g., extremity, rib, hip, cranial) but exclude fractures to digits. 15 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Safety Endpoints through 24 months Similar safety profile between BKP and NSM BKP serious adverse events considered related to procedure/device 1 patient with a procedure-related post-operative urinary tract infection with subsequent spondylitis at the treated level possibly related to the cement 1 patient with a device-related subcutaneous hematoma 1 patient with worsening index fracture and anterior cement migration (possibly cement-related) No device- or procedure-related myocardial infarctions, pulmonary embolisms, neurological injuries, or deaths BKP did not result in a significant increase in number of patients with subsequent vertebral fractures or subsequent adjacent fractures 16 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

Kyphon Balloon Kyphoplasty Important Safety Information The complication rate with Kyphon Balloon Kyphoplasty has been demonstrated to be low. There are risks associated with the procedure (e.g., cement extravasation), including serious complications, and though rare, some of which may be fatal. For complete information regarding indications for use, contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, and methods of use, please reference the devices Instructions for Use included with the product. 17 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

FREE Study Summary Level I Clinical Evidence in support of BKP Largest multicenter randomized clinical trial with 24-month follow-up supporting BKP as a beneficial treatment for acute VCFs BKP was shown to be more effective than NSM Faster and sustained pain relief Quicker return of mobility Better quality of life Greater patient satisfaction BKP is a safe procedure Overall frequency of patients with AEs and serious AEs was similar between BKP and NSM through 24 months No statistical difference in the number of patients with new radiographic or clinical fractures Only 2% of BKP patients had serious device/procedure-related AEs 18 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes

www.compressionfracturestudy.com www.medtronic.com Medtronic Kyphon Products Division 1221 Crossman Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Telephone: 408.548.6500 Customer Service: 866.959.7466 2011 Medtronic Spine LLC. All Rights Reserved. 19 PMD006367-1.0 FREE Study Outcomes