CROWN PRT. The crowning touch. Experience designs performance

Similar documents
MITROFLOW VALSALVA CONDUIT TM

CROWN PRT. Inservice implantation guide

SOLO SMART. The smart way to return to life. Native-like performance now with stented-like implantability

MEMO 3D RECHORD. Ready to repair. Guiding standards in Mitral valve repair

ready to repair product brochure PERFORMANCE INNOVATION DESIGN mitral solutions

MEMO 4D Reshaping Mitral Repair

MEMO 3D. The true reflection of the mitral annulus. Natural physiological 3D motion

Hemodynamics Benefit of Supra-Annular Design in Failed Bio-Prosthetic Valves

REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SURGERY AND FACILITATING FASTER RECOVERY

PROVEN PLUS. Introducing the Avalus Aortic Valve by Medtronic.

The stentless bioprosthesis has many salient features that

How to Avoid Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch

PPM: How to fit a big valve in a small heart

Experience with 500 Stentless Aortic Valve Replacements

Mitroflow Aortic Bioprosthesis 5-Year Follow-Up: North American Prospective Multicenter Study

Role of Sutureless Valves in the Surgeon s Armamentarium Prof. Dr Malakh Shrestha Vice Chair, Director of Aortic Surgery Cardiothoracic,

The St. Jude Medical Biocor Bioprosthesis

Management of Difficult Aortic Root, Old and New solutions

CoreValve in a Degenerative Surgical Valve

Stentless aortic valves. Current aspects

Late failure of transcatheter heart valves: An open question

A 20-year experience of 1712 patients with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis

Prosthetic valve dysfunction: stenosis or regurgitation

Aortic root enlargement is an invaluable surgical technique

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence IP865/2 Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement for aortic stenosis

Expanding Relevance of Aortic Valve Repair Is Earlier Operation Indicated?

Patient/prosthesis mismatch: how to evaluate and when to act?

Abileaflet mechanical valve is described by a nominal size, which

Does Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Affect Long-term Results after Mitral Valve Replacement?

Indications and Late Results of Aortic Valve Repair

Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless prosthesis: 7 years experience in 130 patients

Annular Stabilization Techniques in the Context of Aortic Valve Repair

TAVR for Valve-In-Valve. Brian O Neill Assistant Professor of Medicine Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology

MICS & FEMORAL CANNULAE

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

2017 Cardiovascular Symposium CARDIAC SURGERY UPDATE: SMALLER INCISIONS AND LESS COUMADIN DAVID L. SAINT, MD

42yr Old Male with Severe AR Mild LV dysfunction s/p TOF -AV Replacement(tissue valve) or AoV plasty- Kyung-Hwan Kim

Stent valve implantation in conventional redo aortic valve surgery to prevent patient prosthesis mismatch

Trifecta Valve. Clinical Compendium. Five Year Data

CONVENTIONAL ADULT CANNULAE

CONVENTIONAL ADULT CANNULAE

Copyright by ICR Publishers 2014

Sorin Group. Marco Chiadò Piat, VP Corporate Development. Goldman Sachs European Medtech and Healthcare Services 5-6 September 2007

Comparison between three types of stented pericardial aortic valves (Trivalve trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

New Cardiovascular Devices and Interventions: Non-Contrast MRI for TAVR Abhishek Chaturvedi Assistant Professor. Cardiothoracic Radiology

Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC FACC, FESC President Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons Associate Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery King Abdulaziz

The Key Questions in Mitral Valve Interventions. Where Are We in 2018?

Comparison of eight prosthetic aortic valves in a cadaver model

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Mitral Valve Prostheses

Outcome of Next-Generation Transcatheter Valves in Small Aortic Annuli: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Comparison

The diameter of the aortic valve is in direct proportion

Disease of the aortic valve is frequently associated with

Incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients receiving mitral Biocor porcine prosthetic valves

AVR with Sutureless Valves State of the Art

Mitral Programme Update

The Edge-to-Edge Technique f For Barlow's Disease

Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: Clinical performance over 20 years

EVERYTHING ABOUT MECHANICAL VALVES HAS CHANGED

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated surgical bioprostheses

Reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous body during aortic and

A Surgeon s Perspective Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease Adapted from the 2006 ACC/AHA Guideline Revision

Joseph E. Bavaria, M.D. Roberts Measy Professor and Vice Chief CardioVascular Surgery Director: Thoracic Aortic Surgery Program University of

TSDA Boot Camp September 13-16, Introduction to Aortic Valve Surgery. George L. Hicks, Jr., MD

The implantation of bioprostheses is the preferred. Influence of Prosthesis Patient Mismatch on Diastolic Heart Failure After Aortic Valve Replacement

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

PVL Assessment. Is paravalvular regurgitation after TAVR still an important consideration in 2018?

PATIENT BOOKLET MEDTRONIC SURGICAL VALVE REPLACEMENT. Tissue Valve for Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement

15-Year Comparison of Supra-Annular Porcine and PERIMOUNT Aortic Bioprostheses

An anterior aortoventriculoplasty, known as the Konno-

UNDERSTANDING YOUR HEART VALVE. Mosaic Tissue Valve

Aortic valve repair is an accepted option for aortic valve

Global Myocardial Protection

Stainless Steel. Cobalt-chromium

Eight-Year Results of Aortic Root Replacement With the Freestyle Stentless Porcine Aortic Root Bioprosthesis

Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Replacement: Results of Two European Centers

Portico (St. Jude Medical Inc, St.

Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC, FRCS (Glasgow), FACC, FESC President of Saudi Heart Association King Abdulaziz Cardiac Centre Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Aortic valve replacement: is porcine or bovine valve better?

Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: Assessment of 12-year performance

TAVR for low-risk patients in 2017: not so fast.

Assessment of the St. Jude Medical Regent Prosthetic Valve by Continuous-Wave Doppler. and dobutamine stress echocardiography

Aortic valve replacement and prosthesis-patient mismatch in the era of trans-catheter aortic valve implantation

TAVI Versus Suturless Valve In Intermediate Risk Patients

Cowen and Company Annual Healthcare Conference 2018

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement How Close Are We?

Reoperation for Bioprosthetic Mitral Structural Failure: Risk Assessment

The Bicuspid AV Surgical Conisiderations

Iatrogenic pathology of the heart:

Aortic Root Replacement Using an Allograft for Active Infective Endocarditis With Periannular Abscess: Single Center Experience

The clinical problem of atrioventricular valve regurgitation

Late secondary TR after left sided heart disease correction: is it predictibale and preventable

Challenging anatomies demand versatility.

Lessons From The Computer Model and How We Do Root Replacement

The Bicuspid AV Surgical Considerations

QUANTIFICATION AND PREVENTION TECHNIQUES OF PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH

In Vitro Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Imaging of a Stented Porcine Bioprosthetic Valve: The Bent Strut Artifact

TAVI EN INSUFICIENCIA AORTICA

Copyright by ICR Publishers 2015

Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Regurgitation Due to Degenerative Disease

Thrombocytopenia in Moderate- to High-Risk Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement

Transcription:

CROWN PRT TM The crowning touch Experience designs performance

Crowning Achievements Continuous Innovation Long Term Clinical Evidence Global Reach Crowning Design Smooth Handling Straightforward Implantability Ample Versatility CROWN PRT Crowning Performance Optimal Hemodynamics Minimized Patient Prosthesis Mismatch Proven Durability In the treatment of aortic valve disease, the replacement of the native aortic valve with a stented bioprosthesis represents a standard technique to provide older patients with a performing and durable solution, while relieving them from the discomfort of lifelong oral anticoagulation therapy. CROWN PRT is the latest advancement in stented aortic bioprosthesis technology, featuring surgeon-friendly design and state-of-the-art performance. 2

Crowning achievements Pioneering innovative clinical solutions CROWN PRT is part of LivaNova's cardiac surgery offering, a full suite of innovative solutions, supported by strong clinical evidence and adopted by healthcare providers worldwide. 3

Innovative CROWN PRT stems from LivaNova s 45 year-long commitment to developing breakthrough innovations, an experience that has brought the company to become market leader in cardiac surgery. PYROLYTIC CARBON MONOCAST MITROFLOW CARBOMEDICS STANDARD (AORTIC) AVANT PERICARBON STENTLESS (AORTIC) 1969 1973 1977 1982 1985 1990 1991 1993 1998 HLM PERICARBON (AORTIC AND MITRAL) BICARBON CARBOMEDICS TOP HAT BICARBON OVERLINE FREEDOM SOLO PERCEVAL FIRST IN MAN S5 HEART-LUNG MACHINE MITROFLOW WITH PRT INSPIRE MITROFLOW VALSALVA CONDUIT CROWN PRT 2003 2004 2007 2009 2011 2012 2013 2014 CARBOMEDICS CARBO-SEAL VALSALVA MEMO 3D XTRA CONNECT & HEARTLINK SOLO SMART MEMO 3D RECHORD 4

Proven 100 Study Trials* 40,000 Patient Treatments* CROWN PRT is part of LivaNova's array of Aortic Solutions which encompass both mechanical and biological prostheses. LivaNova's mechanical and biological stented solutions have been successfully implanted since the eighties while its more recent biological stentless and sutureless solutions since the nineties and the turn of the century. The proven clinical performance of these products is substantiated by the remarkable number of study trials and patient treatments reported in literature. *LivaNova aortic prostheses to date. 5

Global LivaNova's stented biological solutions are successfully used in more than 80 countries throughout the world. LivaNova's R&D structures in Canada and Italy systematically integrate the progress of science and technology into products with the objective of developing efficient and safe therapies for patients and healthcare providers. 6

Crowning design Surgeon friendly design for straightforward implantability and versatility CROWN PRT's surgeon-friendly design further supports LivaNova s commitment to continuous innovation. The visible markers provide precise positioning. The radiographic markers allow sharp visualization during X-ray imaging. 7

EASY TO HANDLE AND IMPLANT Short rinse time for streamlined procedures CROWN PRT s two-minute rinse time makes intra-operative valve preparation fast and help save on aortic clamp time. One minute rinse in a first 500ml basin + One minute rinse in a second 500ml basin Flexible stent for easy manipulation and structural resistance CROWN PRT s flexible stent provides resilience towards possible deformations during implant and robustness towards creep over time.valve preparation fast and help save on aortic clamp time. Under back-pressures of 2.000 mmhg - ten times higher than the maximal physiological ones - Stent adapts by bending its posts and then comes back to its original design once back-pressures are released.* Visible markers for precise orientation and even suture placement CROWN PRT s sewing cuff visible markers help precise valve placement and evenly distribute sutures. Radiographic markers for sharp X-ray imaging CROWN PRT s sewing cuff offers radio-opaque information on the precise position of commissures through a specially shaped insert, impregnated with tungsten powder. Low friction sewing cuff for soft suture placement CROWN PRT s sewing cuff facilitates suturing by reducing friction. *LivaNova 2014. Data on file. 8

VERSATILE Supra-intra annular positioning for adaptability to diverse anatomies and surgeon preferences CROWN PRT valve offers surgeons the option of supra or intra-annular valve placement based on patient anatomy and surgeon practice. Supra-annular seating Intra-annular seating The lowest profile tissue valve for clearance of coronary ostia and sino-tubular junction Clearance of both coronary ostia and sino-tubular junction is assured, even in narrow aortic roots. The low/flat profile also allows the surgeon greater visibility of the aortic anatomy during the procedure. Coronary clearance is ensured by the flat profile, which also facilitates knot lowering. 1 Slim, elastic sewing cuff for full comformability to the native annulus The malleable sewing cuff facilitates implantation by allowing full conformability to all types of annuli, even stiff/calcified and/or irregular roots. The slim sewing ring also serves this goal and is slightly malleable so that implantation in stiff roots is facilitated. 1 9

Crowning performance Optimal hemodynamics and proven durability CROWN PRT's state-of-the-art performance is the result of LivaNova's long standing experience in heart valve design and cutting edge science of materials. The wide open design provides optimal hemodynamics. The patented Phospholipid Reduction Treatment (PRT) is intended to enhance durability through mitigation of calcium absorption.* *LivaNova 2014. Data on file. 10

DESIGNED TO OPEN WIDE Single bovine pericardium outer layer for maximized flow areas CROWN PRT s single bovine pericardium layer is mounted outside the stent. This optimizes hemodynamic performance by maximizing the flow area through a synchronous and unimpeded opening of the leaflets. 2 Smallest tissue valve on the market as an alternative option to aortic root enlargement By providing favorable transvalvular pressure gradients even in small aortic annuli, CROWN PRT minimizes occurrence of patient-prosthesis mismatch and thus represents an alternative to aortic root enlargement, which is known to be associated with an increase of surgical risk. 3 Smallest tissue valve on the market 11

OPTIMAL HEMODYNAMICS In-vivo hemodynamics The capability of LivaNova s single bovine pericardial outer layer design to maximize flow areas through leaflets that open uniformly and wide has demonstrated excellent in-vivo hemodynamic performance since its introduction in the market in 1982. Literature overviews highlight low pressure gradients, large effective orifice areas and a remarkable regression on the left ventricular mass. Synchronous and Unimpeded Valve Opening CROWN PRT 19 CROWN PRT 21 CROWN PRT 23 Low Pressure Gradient (PG) Mean PG [mmhg] 100 80 60 40 20 0 13.4 8.6 9.4 10 11.5 8.5 10.6 7.1 4.7 7.5 8.6 size 19 size 21 size 23 size 25 Jamieson WR. et al., 2010 5 Conte J. et al., 2010 10 Yankah CA. et al., 2005 6 EOA [cm 2 ] 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.4 Large Effective Orifice Area (EOA) 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.2 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.3 LVM [g] 250 200 150 100 50 Remarkable Regression of Left Ventricular Mass (LVM) 213 176.6 0.0 size 19 size 21 size 23 size 25 0 Preop Postop Jamieson WR. et al., 2010 5 Ugur M.et al., Yankah CA. 2014 11 et al., 2005 6 Jamieson WR. et al., 2010 5 It exhibits a flat, native-like velocity profile. 1 Recovery of the left ventricle is thus enhanced and longterm outcome improved. 1 12

OPTIMAL HEMODYNAMICS Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch The single bovine pericardial outer layer design reflects into in-vivo measurements of large effective orifice area indexed values and therefore minimized patient prosthesis mismatch. 4 Large Effective Orifice Areas Index for Minimized Patient-Prostheses Mismatch BSA (m 2 ) Valve size EOA* (cm 2 ) 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Effective Orifice Area Indexed 11 19mm 21mm 23mm 25mm 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.3 1.20 1.50 1.80 2.30 1.09 1.36 1.64 2.09 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.92 0.92 1.15 1.38 1.77 0.86 1.07 1.29 1.64 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.53 0.75 0.94 1.13 1.44 0.71 0.88 1.06 1.35 0.67 0.83 1.00 1.28 0.63 0.79 0.95 1.21 0.60 0.75 0.90 1.15 0.57 0.71 0.86 1.10 0.55 0.68 0.82 1.05 0.52 0.65 0.78 1.00 0.50 0.63 0.75 0.96 0.48 0.60 0.72 0.92 EOAI 0.85 No Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch 4 0.65 < EOAI < 0.85 Moderate Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch 4 EOAI 0.65 Severe Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch 4 13

DESIGNED AND TREATED TO LAST One-seam knit polyester for smooth contact surface between pericardium and synthetic material Cushioned leaflet contact reduces pericardium wear, enhancing valve durability. Cross-stitch pattern for even stress distribution on commissures The presence By optimally distributing stress on the commissures, pressure forces on the valve posts are relieved during the cardiac cycle. 14

DESIGNED AND TREATED TO LAST Phospholipid Reduction Treatment for mitigated calcium absorption The presence of phospholipids in the pericardial tissue play a key role in the calcification process of bioprostheses as their phosphate heads are potential binding sites for circulating calcium ions. Ca Calcium Phospholipid Crown PRT features LivaNova s patented Phospholipid Reduction Treatment (PRT) which has proved to decrease phospholipid content in pericardial tissue leading to a remarkable reduction of calcium uptake compared to control tissue.* Ca Calcium Phospholipid The PRT process removes phospholipids using Octanediol, a long chain alcohol that possesses a lipid-soluble tail to aid its solubility in phospholipids s heads and a water-soluble head to allow removal by rinsing pericardial layers before valve manufacturing. Octanediol molecule Octanediol molecule Phospholipid An untreated pericardial layer is going to be treated using Octanediol molecules Phospholipid The Octanediol s lipidsoluble tail interacts with the phospholipid s head Phospholipid The Octanediol s water-soluble head makes the phospholipid soluble, namely removable by rinsing pericardium layers before manufacturing Lipid-soluble tail Watersoluble head *LivaNova 2014. Data on file. 15

PROVEN DURABILITY In-vitro durability CROWN PRT s unique design shows outstanding resistance during acceler ng at ISO 5840 condition Freedom from structural valve degeneration (as per ISO 5840) 100 80 60 40 20 0 Years Equivalent 5 10 15 20 25 33 37.5 40 42.5 Milion Cycles: 200 400 600 800 1.000 1.320 1.500 1.600 1.700 % CROWN PRT 19mm CROWN PRT 23mm CROWN PRT 27mm No failures up to 1.5 billion cycles, equivalent to 37.5 years. Over 6 times the minimum requirement.* In-vivo durability LivaNova s single bovine pericardial outer layer design has over 21 years of published clinical data proving already excellent durability without anti-calcification treatment. Freedom from structural valve degeneration % 100 100 85.6 85.3 80 60 40 20 0 67 62.3 10 yrs 11 yrs 17 yrs 18 yrs 20 yrs Years after operation Jamieson WR. et al., 2009 7 Wilbring M. et al., 2013 3 Yankah CA. et al., 2005 6 ISTHMUS Investigators., 2011 8 Yankah CA. et al., 2008 9 During the whole follow-up, which ranged up to 11 years, we recorded no reoperation because of failed prosthesis. 3 In-animal calcium absorption mitigation testing By reducing the nucleation sites for calcium deposition - the phospholipids in the pericardial tissue - the Phospholipid Reduction Treatment (PRT) addresses directly the origin of tissue calcification which may lead to an enhanced valve durability. Tests in subcutaneous rat implants at 60 days demonstrate a significant reduction of calcium content in PRT-treated bovine pericardium patches compared to control. µgca/mg DW 30,00 20,00 10,00 0,00 27.57 Untreated 0.72 CROWN PRT The Phospholipid Reduction Treatment (PRT) process is intended to enhance already proven resilient durability by reducing calcium absorption up to 97% compared to control.* *LivaNova 2014. Data on file. 16

Product ordering information Size A B C D Outside Overall Diameter (mm) Height (mm) Inside Diameter (mm) Sewing Ring Width (mm) C CNA19 CNA21 CNA23 CNA25 CNA27 CNA29 15.4 17.3 19.0 21.0 22.9 24.7 18.6 20.7 22.7 25.1 27.3 29.5 11 13 14 15 16 16 21 23 26 29 31 33 A B D A = Inside Diameter B = Outside Diameter C = Overall Height D = Sewing Ring Width Accessories ordering information Cat. # ICV1353 AH-11 Description Bendable dual-ended sizers 19-21mm 23-25mm 27-29mm Handle References 1. Hartrumpf M, Kuehnel R, Erb M, Loladze G, Mueller T, Albes J. Favorable gradients with the mitroflow aortic valve prosthesis in everyday surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jul;60(5):326-33; discussion 333-4. 2. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Dieringer MA, Greiser A, Schulz-Menger J. In vitro assessment of heart valve bioprostheses by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: four-dimensional mapping of flow patterns and orifice area planimetry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Sep;40(3):736-42. 3. Wilbring M, Alexiou K, Schumann E, Matschke K, Tugtekin SM. Isolated aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic annulus-a high-risk group on long-term follow-up. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;61(5):379-85. 4. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Oct;36(4):1131-41. 5. Jamieson WR, Forgie WR, Hayden RI, Langlois Y, Ling H, Stanford EA, Roberts KA, Dolman WB. Hemodynamic performance of mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis - optimizing management for the small aortic annulus. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Mar;58(2):69-75. 6. Yankah CA, Schubel J, Buz S, Siniawski H, Hetzer R. Seventeen-year clinical results of 1,037 Mitroflow pericardial heart valve prostheses in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis. 2005 Mar;14(2):172-9; discussion 179-80. 7. Jamieson WR, Koerfer R, Yankah CA, Zittermann A, Hayden RI, Ling H, Hetzer R, Dolman WB. Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis clinical performance. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Nov;36(5):818-24. 8. ISTHMUS Investigators. The Italian study on the Mitroflow postoperative results (ISTHMUS): a 20-year, multicentre evaluation of Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jan;39(1):18-26; discussion 26. 9. Yankah CA, Pasic M, Musci M, Stein J, Detschades C, Siniawski H, Hetzer R. Aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: durability results up to 21 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Sep;136(3):688-96. 10. Conte J, Weissman N, Dearani JA, Bavaria J, Heimansohn D, Dembitsky W, Doyle D. A North American, prospective, multicenter assessment of the Mitroflow aortic pericardial prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jul;90(1):144-152. 11. Ugur M, Suri RM, Daly RC, Dearani JA, Park SJ, Joyce LD, Burkhart HM, Greason KL, Schaff HV. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan 15. pii: S0022-5223(14)00027-0. 17

01/16 RE0210200/D Crown PRT is NOT available for sale in Canada. Manufactured by: LivaNova Canada Corp. Heart Valves Manufacturing Operations 5005 North Fraser Way Burnaby BC V5J5M1 - Canada Tel: 1-604-412-5650 Sorin Group Italia Srl A wholly-owned subsidiary of LivaNova Plc Via Crescentino - 13040 Saluggia (VC) Italy Теl: +39 0161 487472 - Fax: +39 0161 487316 info.cardiacsurgery@livanova.com Please always refer to the Instructions For Use (IFU) manual provided with each product for detailed information, warnings, precautions and possible adverse side effects. 2016 LivaNova all rights reserved.