Objectives: 1. Determine the effect of nitrogen and potassium applications on sugar beet root yield and quality.

Similar documents
Methods and Materials:

Using Tissue and Soil Tests Together Helps Make Better Decisions. John Lee Soil Scientist AGVISE Northwood, ND

AGVISE Laboratories Established 1976

Cultivar Specific Nitrogen Management Profiles For Irrigated Process Varieties Inkster, ND 2009

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

Potassium and Phosphorus as Plant Nutrients. Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. Potassium is required in large amounts by many crops

USE OF OCEANGROWN PRODUCTS TO INCREASE CROP YIELD AND ESSENTIAL NUTRIENT CONTENT. Dave Franzen, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

TABLE OF CONTENTS Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative Official Variety Trial Research 1

In mid-october, all plots were again soil sampled to determine residual nutrients.

Survey of Insecticide Use in Sugarbeet in Eastern North Dakota and Minnesota Sugarbeet Research and Extension Reports.

Dry Bean Fertility Dave Franzen NDSU Soil Science Specialist

SOIL TEST INTERPRETATION JIM FASCHING Technical Field Representative

INITIAL INVESTIGATIONS OF POOR SUGARBEET AREAS. D.W. Franzen, D.H. Hopkins, and Mohamed Khan North Dakota State University INTRODUCTION

Interpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations

INFLUENCE OF DAIRY MANURE APPLICATIONS ON CORN NUTRIENT UPTAKE

Lime Fertilizer Interactions Affecting Vegetable Crop Production' Delbert D. Hemphill, Jr., and T. L. ABSTRACT

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

FACT SHEET. Understanding Cation Exchange Capacity and % Base Saturation

May 2008 AG/Soils/ pr Understanding Your Soil Test Report Grant E. Cardon Jan Kotuby-Amacher Pam Hole Rich Koenig General Information

Variability in Tissue Testing What Does It Mean For Nutrient Recommendations?

Soil Testing Options in High Tunnels. Bruce Hoskins University of Maine anlab.umesci.maine.edu

What s new with micronutrients in our part of the world?

POSTHARVEST RESPIRATION RATE AND SUCROSE CONCENTRATION OF RHIZOCTONIA-INFECTED SUGARBEET ROOTS

Management of Root Diseases in Sugarbeet

Table 2. Leaf Tissue Nutrient Levels of Nonpareil Almond on Eight Different Rootstocks. July, Escalon CA N (%)

Protein and Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer and Variation of Plant Tissue Analysis in Wheat

Evaluation of Manganese Fertility of Upland Cotton in the Lower Colorado Valley

Fertility management in soybean

Soybean Soil Fertility

Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Understanding a Soil Report

Sunflower Special Topics: Nutrient Requirements of Sunflower

Pr gyp -TURF. a soil and turf fertility product. S E E S. f u.

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER AND SOIL SUPPLEMENT AGRISPON 1 ON ROOT YIELD AND SUCROSE CONTENTS OF SUGAR BEET 2 (BETA VULGARIS)

Trends in Micro-Nutrient Soil Test Levels in Saskatchewan Pat Flaten, PAg 1, Brandon Green, PAg 2, Paul Routledge, PAg 3

Figure A. Cercospora leaf spot disease cycle.

Nutrient Recommendations Agronomic Crops Last Updated 12/1/16. Grain Corn. Crop Highlights Target ph: 6.0

12. ZINC - The Major Minor

The 1 th International and The 4 th National Congress on Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture April 2012 in Isfahan, Iran

DAFFODILS ARE WHAT THEY EAT: NUTRITIONAL ASPECTS OF SOILS

Premier Russet Management Guide - Idaho

Understanding Your Soil Report. Michael Cook 2018

Introduction to Wolf Trax

Potash Phosphate Nitrogen

Soybean Nutrient Profile

Research Report Forage Sorghum Hybrid Yield and Quality at Maricopa, AZ, 2015

The Relationship of Nitrogen to the Formation of Sugar in Sugar Beets 1

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Iron Chelates in Managing Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Grain Sorghum

Multi-K. Potassium Nitrate Products For Healthy Crops

ADVANCING CORN YIELDS. Sulf-N Ammonium Sulfate

Soil Conditions Favoring Micronutrient Deficiencies and Responses in 2001

Enclosed are the tissue analysis results for the samples from the greens at Golf Club.

Nutrient management irrigated corn. Jim Camberato

FERTILIZER EFFECTS UPON MICRONUTRIENT NUTRITION OF THE AVOCADO

Managing Micronutrients with Soil (Plant) Testing and Fertilizer

INTERPRETATION GUIDE TO SOIL TEST REPORTS

Effects of Foliar Potassium Fertilization on Muskmelon Fruit Quality and Yield 1. 83, Building 200, Weslaco, Texas 78596

North Dakota Fertilizer Recommendation Tables and Equations

1101 S Winchester Blvd., Ste. G 173 San Jose, CA (408) (408) fax Page 1 of 2

Corn and soybean yield responses to micronutrients fertilization

SUGAR CROPS PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AT THE IBERIA AND SUGAR RESEARCH STATIONS

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

Determination of Nitrate Nitrogen in Sugarbeet Petioles and Soils With 2-6-Dimethyl Phenol l

Soil 4234 Guest Lecture

Impact of High Glucosinolate Mustard Biomass and Meal on Black Bean Yield

AZOMITE and Coffee & Cacao

INTERPRETING SOIL & LEAF ANALYSIS

2006- Foliar insecticide effects on soybean aphid and soybean yield. Summary Background Objective Site and application description

Nutrient Management in Subtropical Tree Crops. The avocado model

2011 VERMONT ORGANIC CORN SILAGE VARIETY TRIAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evaluation of Three Systemic Fungicides. for Control of Powdery Mildew

In-depth studies initiated: Results:

Quick Tips for Nutrient Management in Washington Berry Crops. Lisa Wasko DeVetter Assistant Professor, Small Fruit Horticulture March 16, 2016

SOIL MICRONUTRIENTS: FROM B to Z. Scott J. Sturgul 1. Introduction

MEASURE AND MANAGE. Zinc. By Dale Cowan Agri-Food Laboratories CCA.On

Micro Nutrients Major Effects

Almond Nitrogen Nutrition

BOTANY AND PLANT GROWTH Lesson 9: PLANT NUTRITION. MACRONUTRIENTS Found in air and water carbon C oxygen hydrogen

Soils and Soil Fertility Management

POTASSIUM 4Growth Komodo and Komodo Pro by Rick Vetanovetz PhD

FERTILIZATION. Roland D. Meyer, Daniel B. Marcum, and Steve B. Orloff ESSENTIAL PLANT NUTRIENTS

MICRO NUTRIENTS AND SECONDARY NUTRIENTS

REMEMBER as we go through this exercise: Science is the art of making simple things complicated!

Fertilization Programming

Limitations to Plant Analysis. John Peters & Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Ground-truthing The Soil Residual Herbicide Bioassay

POSTHARVEST RESPIRATION RATE AND SUCROSE CONTENT OF RHIZOCTONIA-INFECTED SUGARBEET ROOTS

Discuss the importance of healthy soils Soil properties, physical, chemical and biological that one can manage for soil health How organics play a

How to Develop a Balanced Program for Pecan and Chili. Robert R Smith

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management. Hailin Zhang. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

Project: TopCal for sodium management during leaching at Mission Viejo Country Club

1) Yellow Corn in 2014 Compared to 2013 and ) Time of Day Plant Tissue Project

Nutrition. Grain Legume Handbook

Final Report 2015 Field Demonstrations of Sorghum Forages for the California Dairy Industry

ORGANIC ROMAINE HEARTS LATE SUMMER 2017 SALINAS, CA

ALP Program Report Fall - Cycle 34

Citrus Nutrition Research Leading to Revised Fertilzier Recommendations for HLB-affected

5/23 6/26 6/30 7/21 CONCLUSIONS

Correction of Zinc Deficiency in Avocado

Transcription:

NITROGEN AND POTASSIUM EFFECTS ON SUGAR BEET QUALITY John A. Lamb 1, Mark W. Bredehoeft 2, and Chris Dunsmore 2 1 Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 2 Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative, Renville, MN Justification of Research: Growers in the Southern Minnesota have been concerned about potassium nutrition in sugar beet. Some of this concern comes from the increase in the number of potassium soil test values from production fields that are decreasing into the 0 to 0 ppm range. The concern is about loss of root yield from the lower soil test values and the loss of quality if potassium fertilizer is applied. Little research has been done on potassium in the Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative growing area. There is a need to investigate this. Summary of Literature Review: The current fertilizer recommendations for growing sugar beet in Minnesota include the use of potassium when soil test values are below 0 ppm, (Lamb et. al 01). At that time the optimum N guideline was 1 pounds per acre. The amount of N was from soil nitrate-n to a depth of 4 feet. Potassium use for sugar beets grown in Minnesota was investigated in 1985, Lamb 1986. In this study, potassium was looked at as part of a nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium factorial. There were only a couple of application rates and the rates did not cover a wide range. The combination of nitrogen and potassium could lead to increased efficiency of the plant use. Objectives: 1. Determine the effect of nitrogen and potassium applications on sugar beet root yield and quality. Materials and Methods: An experiment at five locations was established in the Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative growing area, 3 in and 2 in 11. One of the two sites in 11 was lost because of the wet planting conditions in May. The experiment included the factorial combination of four nitrogen application rates (0, 40, 80, and 0 lb N/A) and six potassium rates (0,, 60, 90, 0, and 500 lb K 2 O/A). The two highest potassium rates are extreme to assess the effect of potassium on the root quality, percent sucrose and beet purity. The study will have five replications. During the 11 growing season (July) petioles from the most recently matured leaves were sampled to determine the effect of the treatments on the sugarbeet plants. In October sugarbeet roots were harvested. Root yield and quality were determined. Results and Discussion: Soil Test: The initial soil test for the site is reported in Table 1. The 73 and 1172 sites are irrigated sandy soils while the other soils are glacial till soils with a texture of silty clay loam. The potassium soil tests for 3 of the 4 sites are in the marginal range. The 75 would be considered very high. Table 1. Initial soil test values for the sites in and 11. Soil test 73 (Elrosa) 74(RRF) 75(Maynard) 1172(Sudan) ph 6.7 6.6 7.9 6.3 Organic matter (%) 4.1 2.6 NA 4.0 Nitrate-N 0-4 ft. (lb/a) 62 25 111 (0-2ft) Olsen P (ppm) 6 15 K (ppm) 7 139 177 0 Root Yield: Sugar beet root yield was increased at two of the four site by the application of nitrogen fertilizer, Table 2 and Figures 1 and 2. Increases in root yield also occurred that same sites with potassium application. At both sites there was an interaction between the root yield responses from N application and K applications. The interaction at the 75 caused the response required more nitrogen, 80 lb N/A for optimum root yield at the 0 and lb K 2 O/A rates while the optimum was 40 lb N/A for the sugar beet roots grown at greater rates of potassium.

Table 2. Statistical analysis for root yield for sites in and 11. Statistic 73 74 75 1172 N rate 0.72 0.25 0.0001 0.0003 K rate 0.13 0.13 0.0002 0.0001 N rate X K rate 0.13 0.07 0.008 0.05 C.V. (%) 9.2 6.9 6.0.2 Root yield 75 50 Root yield 75 4 8 Figure 1. Root yield response to nitrogen and potassium at site 75 in. The root yield at site 1172 was affected by the wet weather and disease in 11, Figure 2. The root yields were as small as ton/a and as large as tons. There is no trend in the interaction between nitrogen and potassium at this site. Root yield 1172 Root yield 1172 o K 50 4 8 0 Figure 2. Root yield response to nitrogen and potassium at site 1172 in 11. Extractable Sucrose per ton: Nitrogen reduced extractable sucrose per ton at three of the four sites, Table 3. Potassium increased extractable sucrose per ton at two of the four sites. At site 75, the addition of nitrogen decreased extractable sucrose per ton from 8 lb/ton to 278 lb/ton, Figure 4. Potassium did not affect extractable sucrose per ton at this site. At sites 74 and 1172, nitrogen application decreased extractable sucrose per ton, Figures 5 and 6. This has occurred several times in nitrogen studies through the years. Nitrogen is an impurity in the sugar beet. At these same sites, potassium application increased extractable sucrose per acre, Figures 5 and 6. This is unexpected. Potassium is an impurity in the sugar beet that makes extraction of sucrose more difficult. The main increase at site 74 occurred for the first 90 lb K 2 O/A while about that the response leveled out. At site 1172 the increase in extractable sucrose per ton increased up to the greatest K 2 O rate of 500 lb/a. Table 3. Statistical analysis for extractable sucrose per ton for sites in and 11. Statistic 73 74 75 1172 N rate 0.40 0.0001 0.06 0.02 K rate 0.86 0.003 0.46 0.0001 N rate X K rate 0.17 0.02 0.34 0.49 C.V. (%) 4.5 2.5 4.6 5.0

Figure 4. Extractable sucrose per ton to nitrogen for site 75 in. Extractable sucrose lb/ton 74 0 3 0 290 0 270 0 0 3 0 290 0 270 Extractable sucrose lb/ton 74 50 0 4 8 Figure 5. Extractable sucrose per ton to nitrogen and potassium for site 74 in. Extractable sucrose lb/ton 1172 0 2 0 2 0 190 0 0 2 0 2 0 190 Extractable sucrose lb/ton 1172 50 0 4 8 Figure 6. Extractable sucrose per ton to nitrogen and potassium for site 1172 in 11. Extractable Sucrose per acre: Extractable sucrose per acre was significantly affected by nitrogen application at sites 74, 75, and 1172, Table 4. Extractable sucrose per acre decreased with the addition of nitrogen at site 74, Figure 7. This is a combination of the lack of root yield response to nitrogen and the decrease in quality for the application of nitrogen. There was not significant effect from the application of potassium. At site 75, extractable sucrose per acre was increased by application of both nitrogen and potassium, Figure 8. The optimum nitrogen rate was 80 lb N/A for the 0 and lb K 2 O/A rates and 40 lb N/A for the 60, 90, 0, and 500 lb K 2 O/A rates. This would make the optimum N of 150 to 190 lb N/A, soil test nitrate-n to four feet plus fertilizer N. Nitrogen and potassium applications increased extractable sucrose per acre at the 1172 site, Figure 9. The response to potassium was greater than the response to nitrogen. This site was an irrigated sandy soil site and it was expected to respond to nitrogen and potassium application. With the above normal precipitation in 11 movement in the soil of both N and K would be expected.

Table 4. Statistical analysis for extractable sucrose per acre for sites in and 11. Statistic 73 74 75 1172 N rate 0. 0.007 0.0001 0.002 K rate 0.31 0. 0.01 0.0001 N rate X K rate 0.29 0.03 0.07 0.02 C.V. (%) 9.2 6.8 8.2 19.5 Extractable sucrose lb/a 74 Extractable sucrose lb/a 74 50 4 8 Figure 7. Extractable sucrose per acre to nitrogen and potassium for site 74 in. Extractable sucrose lb/a 75 50 Extractable sucrose lb/a 75 4 8 Figure 8. Extractable sucrose per acre to nitrogen and potassium for site 75 in. Extractable sucrose lb/a 1172 Extractable sucrose lb/a 1172 00 00 50 00 00 4 8 Figure 9. Extractable sucrose per acre to nitrogen and potassium for site 1172 in 11. Petiole Nitrate-N: Samples were taken from the most recently mature petioles in each plot at 1172 in 11. The addition of nitrogen fertilizer increased the nitrate-n concentration in the petioles, Figure. The addition of potassium fertilizer decreased the concentration of nitrate-n in the petioles. This has been reported in potato petioles. This reduction in nitrate-n may explain the increase in quality from the addition of potassium even though potassium in an impurity.

Petiole nitrate N ppm 1172 Petiole nitrate N ppm 1172 00 00 500 0 Petiole nitrate N (ppm) 50 00 00 500 0 Petiole nitrate N (ppm) 4 8 Figure. Petiole nitrate-n concentration as affect by nitrogen and potassium application at site 1172 in 11. Conclusions: Nitrogen application increased root yield at 2 of 4 sites. The use of potassium increased root yield at 2 of 4 sites. Nitrogen reduced quality at 3 of 4 sites. This was expected. The use of potassium increased quality at 2 of 4 sites even though potassium is an impurity in the extraction process. Nitrogen and potassium affected extractable sucrose per acre at 3 sites. Nitrogen increased extractable sucrose per acre at two sites and decreased it at one site. The reduction in extractable sucrose per acre is also the site where root yield was not affected by nitrogen and the quality was reduced by nitrogen application. In 11, petiole nitrate concentrations from samples taken in mid-july were increased with the addition of N fertilizer while the addition of K fertilizer reduced it. The results reported are the produce of two years of work and because of the wet weather in 11 should not be used with future information. Literature Cited: Lamb, J.A., A.L. Sims, L.J. Smith, and G.W. Rehm. 01. Fertilizing Sugar Beet in Minnesota and North Dakota. Univ. Minn. Ext. Ser. FO-07715-C 01 Lamb, J.A. 1986. Effect of phosphorus and potassium fertilization on yield and quality of sugar beet grown in West Central Minnesota. In 1985 Sugarbeet Res. and Ext. Rpts. :98-2.