Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Evolving Revascularization Strategies

Similar documents
Revascularization in Severe LV Dysfunction: The Role of Inducible Ischemia and Viability Testing

Coronary Revascularization in Patients witj Severe LV Dysfunction.: Is the concept of viability still viable?

Coronary Revascularization for Severe LV Dysfunction Is s. Is the concept of viability testing still viable?

Revascularization for Patients with HFrEF: CABG and PCI and the Concept of Myocardial Viability

Rational use of imaging for viability evaluation

Revascularization In HFrEF: Are We Close To The Truth. Ali Almasood

Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: When Should We Intervene?

Ischemic Heart Failure

Valvular Guidelines: The Past, the Present, the Future

CABG alone. It s enough? / Μόνο η αορτοστεφανιαία παράκαμψη είναι αρκετή;

Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo

Take-home Messages from Recent Heart Failure Trials: Heart Rate as a Target

Can Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO!

Ischemic Heart Failure

Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis

Evaluation of Myocardial Viability: What Have We Learned from STICH? Professor of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. Heart Failure (HF)

The Therapeutic Potential of Novel Approaches to RAAS. Professor of Medicine University of California, San Diego

The Approach to Patients with Heart Failure and Mid-Range (40-50%) Ejection Fraction (HFmrEF)

Dialysis-Dependent Cardiomyopathy Patients Demonstrate Poor Survival Despite Reverse Remodeling With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Management of High-Risk CAD : Surgeons Perspective

What the Cardiologist needs to know from Medical Images

Detection and Assessment of MI: Use of Imaging Methods. Robert O. Bonow, M.D.

Coronary interventions

Medical management of LV aneurysm and subsequent cardiac remodeling: is it enough? J. Parissis Attikon University Hospital Athens, Greece

Heart Failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)

Viability Testing Using Dynamic Echocardiography

Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Severe LV Dysfunction

The Role of ICD Therapy in Cardiac Resynchronization

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Burden of Mitral Regurgitation (MR) in the US Why is This Important?

Assessment Of Myocardial Viability

1. LV function and remodeling. 2. Contribution of myocardial ischemia due to CAD, and

Systolic Dysfunction Clinical/Hemodynamic Guide for Management; New Medical and Interventional Therapeutic Challenges

Risk Stratification of Sudden Cardiac Death

High Risk PCI for Heart Failure

Φαρμακευτική θεραπεία της μετεμφραγματικής καρδιακής ανεπάρκειας. Α. Καραβίδας Υπεύθυνος ιατρείου καρδιακής ανεπάρκειας Γ.Ν.Α Γ.

Optimal blockade of the Renin- Angiotensin-Aldosterone. in chronic heart failure

Cardiac devices beyond pacemaker and ICD Prof. Dr. Martin Borggrefe

Management of stable CAD FFR guided therapy: the new gold standard

Cardiac Viability Testing A Clinical Perspective Annual Cardiac Imaging Symposium. Lisa M Mielniczuk MD FRCPC University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Congestive Heart Failure: Outpatient Management

Insights into Viability- Function and Contractile Reserve

Sung A Chang Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center

presenters 2010 Sameh Sabet Ain Shams University

Coronary Artery Disease in the 21 st Century: An Integrated Approach Based on Science and Art

Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Treating HF Patients with ARNI s Why, When and How?

Stress ECG is still Viable in Suleiman M Kharabsheh, MD, FACC Consultant Invasive Cardiologist KFHI KFSHRC-Riyadh

HFpEF. April 26, 2018

Heart Rate Recovery in association with exercise stress testing

The Role of Nuclear Imaging in Heart Failure

2017 Summer MAOFP Update

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

Inducible Myocardial Ischemia and Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Heart Failure Management. Waleed AlHabeeb, MD, MHA Assistant Professor of Medicine Consultant Heart Failure Cardiologist

Disclosures. Speaker s bureau: Research grant: Advisory Board: Servier International, Bayer, Merck Serono, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lupin

12 th Annual Biomarkers in Heart Failure and Acute Coronary Syndromes: Diagnosis, Treatment and Devices. Heart Rate as a Cardiovascular Biomarker

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation. Saverio Iacopino, MD, FACC, FESC

9/10/ , American Heart Association 2

Clinical Considerations for CTO Revascularization

How to Assess Dyssynchrony

Management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction Update 2009 Late comers: which options?

HFpEF, Mito or Realidad?

Cardiovascular Imaging Stress Echo

Therapeutic Targets and Interventions

Sudden death as co-morbidity in patients following vascular intervention

Benefit of Performing PCI Based on FFR

Effects of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodeling and function:

James M. Kirshenbaum, MD, FACC

Biomarkers in the Age of Sacubitril/Valsa rten: Has the PARADIGM Changed

The Hearth Rate modulators. How to optimise treatment

Disclosures. Overview. Goal statement. Advances in Chronic Heart Failure Management 5/22/17

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Guidelines and Missing Groups

ACE inhibitors: still the gold standard?

PCI vs. CABG From BARI to Syntax, Is The Game Over?

Corrective Surgery in Severe Heart Failure. Jon Enlow, D.O., FACS Cardiothoracic Surgeon Riverside Methodist Hospital, Ohiohealth Columbus, Ohio

Joo-Yong Hahn, MD/PhD

Ischemic Mitral Valve Disease: Repair, Replace or Ignore?

The role of remote monitoring in preventing readmissions after acute heart failure

It has been shown from meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that patients with a pre-crt QRS duration (QRSD) >150 ms benefit

HeFSSA Practitioners Program 2017 Theme The Patient Journey: Feel Good and Live Long. Case Study 2

Effect of Ventricular Pacing on Myocardial Function. Inha University Hospital Sung-Hee Shin

MitraClip: Why, How, and For Whom?

Evaluating Clinical Risk and Guiding management with SPECT Imaging

VCU Pauley Heart Center: A 2009 US News Top 50 Heart and Heart Surgery Hospital

Δυναμική υπερηχοκαρδιογραφία στις μυοκαρδιοπάθειες : έχει θέση και ποια ;

Satish K Surabhi, MD.FACC,FSCAI,RPVI Medical Director, Cardiac Cath Labs AnMed Health Heart & Vascular Care

New Agents for Heart Failure: Ivabradine Jeffrey S. Borer, MD

Diagnosis is it really Heart Failure?

Can point of care cardiac biomarker testing guide cardiac safety during oncology trials?

Surgical Management of Heart Failure. Walid Abukhudair MD, FRCSc Head of Cardiac Surgery Department KFAFH Jeddah

New evidences in heart failure: the GISSI-HF trial. Aldo P Maggioni, MD ANMCO Research Center Firenze, Italy

Disclosures for Presenter

Diabetes and the Heart

From PARADIGM-HF to Clinical Practice. Waleed AlHabeeb, MD, MHA Associate Professor of Medicine President of the Saudi Heart Failure Group

Ventricular tachycardia and ischemia. Martin Jan Schalij Department of Cardiology Leiden University Medical Center

Load and Function - Valvular Heart Disease. Tom Marwick, Cardiovascular Imaging Cleveland Clinic

Is Heart Rate a Treatment Target?

Transcription:

Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Evolving Revascularization Strategies Robert O. Bonow, MD, MS, MACC Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute Northwestern Memorial Hospital No Relationships to Disclose

1 Year Survival Rate (%) Prognosis in Chronic CAD Influence of LV Ejection Fraction 88 74% 6 6 65% 5% 62% 56% 4 4 27% 2 2 Medical Surgical Medical Surgical Medical Surgical EF >5% EF 35-5% EF <35% from Muhlbaier et al, Circulation 1992;86:II-198

Increase in Survival (%) Prognosis in Ischemic LV Dysfunction Increase in Survival by Revascularization 6 55% 57% 5 4 37% 41% 44% 3 3% 2 1 1%

Increase in Survival (%) Prognosis in Ischemic LV Dysfunction Increase in Survival by Medical Therapy 1 9 8 8 7 77% [43,91] 9% [7,96] 6 6 5 4 4 3 2 2 38% [2,68] 1 ACEi / ARB ACEi / ARB + β blocker ACEi / ARB + β blocker + ICD / CRT from Yancy CW, J Am Heart Assoc 212;1:16-26

Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure

STICH Trial 1212 patients with EF <35% 99 sites in 22 countries Primary Endpoint: All-cause mortality Secondary Endpoints: CV mortality Death + CV hospitalization Death + HF hospitalization

Mortality Rate STICH Primary Outcome All-Cause Mortality.8 Medical therapy 1212 patients EF <35%.6 HR 95% CI.86.72.1.4.4 P =.123 Medical therapy.2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years After Randomization Velazquez et al. N Engl J Med 211;364:167-1616

CV Mortality Rate STICH Secondary Outcome Cardiovascular Mortality.8 Medical therapy.6 HR 95% CI.81.66.1..4 P =.5 Medical therapy.2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years After Randomization Velazquez et al. N Engl J Med 211;364:167-1616

Death or CV Hospitalization STICH Secondary Outcome Death + CV Hospitalization.8 Medical therapy Medical therapy.6.4.2 HR 95% CI.74.64..85 P <.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years After Randomization Velazquez et al. N Engl J Med 211;364:167-1616

Mortality Rate STICH Secondary Outcome All-Cause Mortality Treatment Received.8 Medical therapy.6.4 HR 95% CI.7.58,.84 P <.1 Medical therapy.2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years After Randomization Velazquez et al. N Engl J Med 211;364:167-1616 Doenst et al. Circ Heart Fail 213;6:443-45

Mortality Rate STICH Secondary Outcome All-Cause Mortality Per Protocol.8 Medical therapy.6.4 HR 95% CI.76.62,.92 P =.5 Medical therapy.2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years After Randomization Velazquez et al. N Engl J Med 211;364:167-1616 Doenst et al. Circ Heart Fail 213;6:443-45

STICH Quality of LIfe KCCQ: Overall Summary KCCQ Overall Summary 8 8 75 75 7 7 + Medical Medical alone Medical 65 65 6 6 Is STICH a negative trial or a positive trial? 55 Baseline 4 mo 12 mo 24 mo 36 mo 1 2 3 Mark et al, Ann Intern Med 214;161:392-399

Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with LV Dysfunction The STICH Trial: Are there subsets who benefit from? Myocardial viability

Mortality Rate Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with LV Dysfunction The STICH Trial: Are there subsets who benefit from? Myocardial viability.8 Without Viability With Viability.6 MED (33 deaths) (25 deaths).56 MED (95 deaths) (83 deaths).4.2.42 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years Following Randomization Interaction P value.528.35.31 Years Following Randomization Bonow et al. N Engl J Med 211;364:1617-1635

Mortality Rate Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with LV Dysfunction The STICH Trial: Are there subsets who benefit from? Myocardial viability The Heart Trial.8 8 With Viability With Viability.6 6 Medical therapy (n=69) Revascularization (n=69) MED (95 deaths) (83 deaths).4 4.2 2 n=138 p=ns.35.31 1 1 2 23 4 3 4 5 6 Years Following Randomization 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years Following Randomization from Cleland et al, Eur J Heart Fail 211;13:227-233 Bonow et al. N Engl J Med 211;364:1617-1635

Patients with ESVI 84 ml/m 2 Bonow et al, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 215;8:1121-1129

Patients with ESVI 84 ml/m 2 Patients with ESVI >84 ml/m 2 Bonow et al, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 215;8:1121-1129

3-Year Mortaltiy (%) Revascularization vs Medical Therapy in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction 8 6 n=36 Medical p=ns 4 4 2 2 Revascularization 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 Amount of Compromised Viable Myocardium (%) from Tarakji et al, Circulation 26;113:23-237

Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with LV Dysfunction The STICH Trial: Are there subsets who benefit from? Myocardial ischemia

Mortality Rate Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with LV Dysfunction The STICH Trial: Are there subsets who benefit from? Myocardial ischemia No Ischemia Ischemia.6.4 MED (31 deaths) (22 deaths).39 MED (56 deaths) (47 deaths).39.2.33.35 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years Following Randomization Years Following Randomization Panza et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 213;61:186-187

Log hazard ratio Impact of Ischemia and Scar on Therapeutic Benefit of Coronary Revascularization 1.5 1. N=13,555 Medical therapy.5. P<.1 Revascularization -.5. 12.5 25. Magnitude of ischemic myocardium associated 37.5 5. with survival benefit with revascularization Total myocardium in ischemic (%) patients without prior MI No such benefit in patients with prior MI Role of ischemia not significant in patients with >1% myocardial scar Hachamovich et al, Eur Heart J 211;32:112-124

Mortality Rate Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with LV Dysfunction The STICH Trial: Are there subsets who benefit from? Biomarkers.8.6 BNP Tertile 1 Tertile 2 Tertile 3.39 BNP Tertile 1 Tertile 2 Tertile 3 Medicine Tertile HR 95% CI Tertile HR 95% CI T2 : T1 2.2 1.23,3.34 T3 : T1 3.5 1.87,4.5 T2 : T1 1.94 1.21,3.9 T3 : T1 2.43 1.52,3.87.39.4.33.35.2 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years Following Randomization Years Following Randomization Feldman et al. Circ Heart Fail 213;6:461-472

Mortality Rate Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with LV Dysfunction The STICH Trial: Are there subsets who benefit from? Functional capacity PAS >55 + 6MW 3m PAS 55 + 6MW <3m.6.4 MED HR 95% CI P value.71.52,.97.33.39 MED HR 95% CI P value.95.75,1.19.626.2 P=.33.33 P=.626 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years Following Randomization Years Following Randomization Stewart et al. JACC Heart Fail 214;2:335-343

Mortality Rate Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with LV Dysfunction The STICH Trial: Are there subsets who benefit from? CAD severity, EF, ESV.8 2 3 Factors 1 Factor.6.4.2 MED (31 deaths) (22 deaths) HR 95% CI P value.71.36,.89.33 P=.4.51.39.39.33 MED (56 deaths) (47 deaths) HR 95% CI P value 1.8.81,1.44.626 P=.591.39.3.35.3 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years Following Randomization Years Following Randomization Panza et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 214;64:553-561

Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with LV Dysfunction Factors to consider: More important Severity of LV dysfunction Severity of LV remodeling Angiographic severity of CAD Functional capacity Less important Extent of myocardial viability Severity of myocardial ischemia Biomarkers Velazquez and Bonow. J Am Coll Cardiol 215;65:615-624