Study Design and Endpoints

Similar documents
Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

CML Update 2016 Arthur 2016

The concept of TFR (Treatment Free Remission) in CML

New drugs in first-line therapy

CML: Living with a Chronic Disease

Stopping treatment how much we understand about mechanisms to stop successfully today, and where are the limits? Andreas Hochhaus

HOW I TREAT CML. 4. KONGRES HEMATOLOGOV IN TRANSFUZIOLOGOV SLOVENIJE Z MEDNARODNO UDELEŽBO Terme Olimia, Podčetrtek,

Imatinib dose intensification, combination therapies. Andreas Hochhaus Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany

Role of Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Newly Diagnosed CML. GIUSEPPE SAGLIO, MD University of Torino, Italy

2nd generation TKIs to first line therapy

Oxford Style Debate on STOPPING Treatment.

Dati sulla sospensione della terapia

La terapia della LMC: è possibile guarire senza trapianto? Fabrizio Pane

2 nd Generation TKI Frontline Therapy in CML

Guidelines and real World: Management of CML in chronic and advanced phases. Carolina Pavlovsky. FUNDALEU May 2017 Frankfurt

New drugs and trials. Andreas Hochhaus

Stopping TKI s in CML- Are we There Yet? Joseph O. Moore, MD Duke Cancer Institute

Treatment free remission in CML: from the concept to practice. François-Xavier Mahon. Cancer Center Bordeaux Université Bordeaux, France

EUROPEAN LEUKEMIANET RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA

Deep molecular responses for treatment- free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia

Impact of Age on Efficacy and Toxicity of Nilotinib in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): ENEST1st Sub-Analysis

CML: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Jorge Cortes, MD Chief CML Section Department of Leukemia The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Stopping Treatment in CML and dose reduction in clinical practice: Can we do it safely? YES WE CAN!

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia A Disease of Young at Heart but Not of Body

Discontinuation of Imatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Maintained Complete Molecular Response: Update Results of the STIM

1 Educational session salient points. Tim Hughes, Vivian Oehler and Rick Van Etten. Tim - Imatinib is a less toxic drug than what we are seeing with

RESEARCH ARTICLE. Introduction. Methods Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

ELN Recommendations on treatment choice and response. Gianantonio Rosti, MD, Department of Hematology, University of Bologna, Italy

CML David L Porter, MD University of Pennsylvania Medical Center Abramson Cancer Center CML Current treatment options for CML

I nuovi guariti? La malattia minima residua nella leucemia mieloide cronica. Fabrizio Pane

Does Generic Imatinib Change the Treatment Approach in CML?

Accepted Manuscript. Improving Outcomes in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Over Time in the Era of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Pradnya Chopade, Luke P.

CML: Role of combination treatments, Interferon and immunotherapy in CML

CML and Future Perspective. Hani Al-Hashmi, MD

Low doses of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in CML

10 YEARS EXPERIENCE OF TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITOR THERAPY FOR CML IN OXFORD

The BCR-ABL1 fusion. Epidemiology. At the center of advances in hematology and molecular medicine

Starting & stopping therapy in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: What more is needed? Richard A. Larson, MD University of Chicago March 2019

How I treat high risck CML

MRD in CML (BCR-ABL1)

When to change therapy? Andreas Hochhaus Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany

What is New in CML Jorge Cortes, MD Chief, CML and AML Sections Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: What more is needed? Richard A. Larson, MD University of Chicago March 2018

IRIS 8-Year Update. Management of TKI Resistance Will KD mutations matter? Sustained CCyR on study. 37% Unacceptable Outcome 17% 53% 15%

Treatment free remission 2016

Post ASH Actualités LMC

Supplementary Online Content

ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

ESMO Updated Guidelines & Treatment Strategies in CML-CP: Maximizing Eligibility for TFR.

Second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitors for frontline treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase

Molecular monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia how low can you go?

What is New in CML in Hagop Kantarjian, M.D. February 2011

Dose reduction. What do we know and how we do it in clinical practice. Andreas Hochhaus

NEW DRUGS IN HEMATOLOGY

SESSION III: Chronic myeloid leukemia PONATINIB. Gianantonio Rosti, MD, Department of Hematology, University of Bologna, Italy

Contemporary and Future Approaches in CML. Emory Meeting; Sea Island August 2014 Hagop Kantarjian, M.D.

CML UPDATE 2018 DAVID S. SNYDER, M.D. MARCH

Imatinib & Ponatinib. Two ends of the spectrum in 2016s reality

Outlook CML 2016: What is being done on the way to cure

Recent advances in the path toward the cure for chronic myeloid leukemia

CML TREATMENT GUIDELINES

A 34-year old women came because of abdominal discomfort. Vital sign was stable. Spleen tip was palpable.

Is there a best TKI for chronic phase CML?

What is the optimal management strategy for younger CP-CML patients with matched, related donors who fail to achieve CCyR

DAVID S. SNYDER, M.D.

CML EHA: what s new? Novità dall EHA >> [ Leucemia mieloide cronica ] Relatore: G. MARTINELLI. Borgo S. Luigi Monteriggioni (Siena) ottobre 2008

Welcome and Introductions

Milestones and Monitoring

517 Spirit 2: An NCRI Randomised Study Comparing Dasatinib with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed CML

Molecular monitoring in CML and the prospects for treatment-free remissions

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Outlook: The Future of CML Therapy

Juan Luis Steegmann Hospital de la Princesa. Madrid. JL Steegmann

DCC-2618, a novel pan-kit and PDGFR

Molecular monitoring of CML patients

Practical Guidance for the Management of CML in 2016

Analytical and economic evaluation of the fully automated Xpert BCR-ABL assay from Cepheid

Management of CML in blast crisis. Lymphoma Tumor Board November 27, 2015

Encouraging activity of novel pan-kit and PDGFRα inhibitor DCC-2618 in patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

LEUKEMIA ANCO s ASH Highlights TOPICS

NCCP Chemotherapy Protocol. Bosutinib Monotherapy

IS MUTATION ANALYSIS OF BCR-ABL OF ANY VALUE IN CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF CML PATIENTS? David Marin, Imperial College London

Contemporary and Future Approaches in Management of CML. Disclosures

Nilotinib AEs (adverse events) in CML population:

Updated review of nilotinib as frontline treatment for newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia

C Longer follow up on IRIS data

Adecade ago imatinib mesylate, the first tyrosine

9/26/2018. Learning Objectives

Goals for chronic myeloid leukemia TK inhibitor treatment: how little disease is too much?

Study Assessing Deep Molecular Response in Adult Patients With CML in Chronic Phase Treated With Nilotinib Firstline. (NILOdeepR)

Abstracts and notes on CML presentations 1 ASH 2012 Atlanta

Decision Making in CML 2010

Long-term side effects, comorbidities & their impact on choice of treatment CML management and quality of life. Andreas Hochhaus

Patient With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Complete Cytogenetic Response: What Does It Mean, and What Does One Do Next?

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

SYNOPSIS Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI444031

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Clinical Guidance Report Bosutinib (Bosulif) for Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia April 21, 2015

Current Monitoring for CML: Goals and. Jorge Cortes, MD Chief, CML & AML Section Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center

15 th Annual Miami Cancer Meeting

Radowan Elnair 1 and Ahmed Galal 2*

Studying First Line Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in a Real-world Setting (SIMPLICITY)

Transcription:

Complete Molecular Response (CMR) Rate With Nilotinib in Patients With CML-CP Without CMR After 2 Years on Imatinib: Preliminary Results From the Randomized ENESTcmr Trial Timothy P. Hughes, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Brian Leber, Nelson Spector, Francisco Cervantes, Ricardo Pasquini, Nelma Cristina D. Clementino, Anthony P. Schwarer, Francois-Xavier Mahon, Delphine Réa, David T. Yeung, Suzanne Kamel-Reid, Israel Bendit, John Reynolds, Lisa Williams, Tomasz Szczudlo, Susan Branford

Introduction 40% of imatinib-treated patients with CML-CP who achieved durable CMR were able to cease therapy without recurrence 1,2 The majority (55%) of patients with CML do not achieve CMR on imatinib even with long-term therapy (> 6 years) 3 In ENESTnd, significantly more patients treated with nilotinib achieved MMR, MR 4 and MR 4.5 compared with imatinib 4 The current report of ENESTcmr includes a minimum of 12 months follow-up on all patients 1. Mahon F, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:1029-1035. 2. Ross DM, et al. Leukemia. 2010;10:1719-1724. 3. Branford S, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:7080-7085. 4. Kantarjian H, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:841-851.

Eligibility Ph+ CML-CP previously treated with imatinib (400 mg or 600 mg daily) for 2 years Documented CCyR by standard cytogenetics or peripheral blood BCR-ABL IS < 1% Persistent disease as demonstrated by 2 positive BCR-ABL transcript levels by RQ-PCR performed in the last 9 months Age 18 years ECOG performance 0-2 QTcF < 450 ms Adequate organ function

Study Design and Endpoints R A N D O M I Z E END POINTS Primary Nilotinib 400 mg BID N = 207 1:1 randomization stratified by: Prior imatinib ( 36 mos, > 36 mos) AND Prior interferon (None, 12 mos, > 12 mos) Imatinib continue same dose 4-year study Confirmed CMR (undetectable BCR-ABL) by 12 months Secondary Kinetics of molecular response (undetectable BCR-ABL levels, MR 4 and MR 4.5 over time RQ-PCR for primary and secondary endpoints was performed every 3 months and assessed at a central laboratory in Adelaide, Australia Safety profile RQ-PCR, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; CCyR, complete cytogenetic response

Definitions of Molecular Endpoints 100 Absolute values Baseline BCR-ABL% IS 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 MMR 0.1% -1 log -2 log -3 log -4 log 0.001 CMR = Undetectable by PCR with sensitivity 4.5 logs -5 log

Definitions of Molecular Endpoints 100 Absolute values Baseline BCR-ABL% IS 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 MMR 0.1% -1 log -2 log -3 log -4 log 0.001 MR 4.5 = Detectable OR undetectable by PCR -5 log

Definitions of Molecular Endpoints 100 Absolute values Baseline BCR-ABL% IS 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 MMR 0.1% -1 log -2 log -3 log -4 log 0.001 MR 4 = Detectable OR undetectable by PCR -5 log

Baseline Demographics (N = 207) Nilotinib 400 mg BID n = 104 Imatinib 400-600 mg QD n = 103 Median age, years (range) 46 (23 82) 52 (19 76) Prior duration of imatinib > 36 months, % 83 80 Prior duration of interferon, % None 57 55 12 months 20 21 > 12 months 23 23 Responses at baseline, % Missing 1 1 BCR-ABL IS > 0.1% 23 27 BCR-ABL IS > 0.01-0.1% 48 49 BCR-ABL IS 0.01% 26 22 CMR (Undetectable BCR-ABL)* 2 2 *With a sample sensitivity of 4.5 logs. 12 month follow-up

Patient Disposition (N = 207) Nilotinib 400 mg BID n = 104 Imatinib 400-600 mg QD n = 103 Still on treatment, % 84 96 Discontinued, % 16 4 Adverse event(s) 9 1 Withdrawal of consent 4 1 Death 1* 0 Other 3 2 *59 year-old male with medical history of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and obesity died due to suspected acute myocardial infarction. Includes pregnancy, protocol violation, and transient loss of MMR. 12 month follow-up

Treatment Duration and Median Dose Median time on treatment, months Median dose intensity, mg/day Nilotinib 400 mg BID n = 101 Prior Imatinib 400 mg QD n = 60 Imatinib n = 103 Prior Imatinib 600 mg QD n = 43 11.6 11.7 11.6 797 400 600 12 month follow-up

% with CMR CMR (Undetectable BCR-ABL*) by 12 Months (ITT) P =.02 P =.108 104 103 104 103 CMR Confirmed CMR (Primary endpoint) Of patients on study at 12 months, 14.9% on nilotinib vs 6.1% on imatinib achieved confirmed CMR (P =.04) *With 4.5-log assay sensitivity. Intention-to-treat analyses included all patients randomized to the study, whether or not they received study drug (n = 3 pts on nilotinib did not) or had CMR at baseline (n = 2 on nilotinib; n = 2 on imatinib). 12 month follow-up

Cumulative Incidence of MR 4 (in patients without MR 4 at baseline) 100 90 80 Nilotinib Imatinib n = 74 n = 78 % with MR 4 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Hazard ratio (95%CI) = 2.1 (1.2, 3.7) 0 3 6 9 12 Months Since Randomization 48.6% P =.006 25.6% 12 month follow-up

Cumulative Incidence of MR 4.5 (in patients without MR 4.5 at baseline) 100 90 80 Nilotinib Imatinib n = 94 n = 91 % with MR 4.5 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Hazard ratio (95%CI) = 2.3 (1.2, 4.2) 0 3 6 9 12 Months Since Randomization 33.0% P =.008 16.5% 12 month follow-up

% with CMR Cumulative Incidence of CMR (in patients without CMR at baseline) 100 90 Nilotinib Imatinib n = 101 n = 100 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Hazard ratio (95%CI) = 2.2 (1.05, 4.7) 0 3 6 9 12 Months Since Randomization 20.8% 10.0% P =.03 12 month follow-up

% Patients Molecular Response Rates by 12 Months (in patients without indicated response at baseline) P =.006 P =.008 P =.03 74 78 94 91 101 100 MR 4 MR 4.5 CMR (Undetectable BCR-ABL)* *With 4.5-log assay sensitivity. 12 month follow-up

BCR ABL Ratio (%) BCR-ABL Ratio (%) Over Time 10 1 0.1 Nilotinib Imatinib 0.01 0.001 Undetectable levels Baseline 3 6 9 12 Months Since Randomization Joined median values, white lines extending to 25th-75th percentiles. 12 month follow-up

BCR-ABL Ratio (%) Over Time Sample timepoint Median BCR-ABL ratio (%) Nilotinib 400 mg BID n = 104 Imatinib 400-600 mg QD n = 103 Baseline.0234.0311 3.0152.0258 6.0094.0298 9.0070.0205 12.0065.0220 12 month follow-up

% with MMR MMR by 12 months (in patients without MMR at baseline) P =.006 24 28 2 patients had a confirmed loss of MMR (1 on each arm)

Drug-Related Adverse Events Drug-related adverse events (AEs), % Nilotinib 400 mg BID n = 104 Imatinib 400-600 mg QD n = 103 Any AE 88 53 Grade 3/4 AEs 29 2 AEs leading to discontinuation 9 0 Serious AEs 4 0 Patients experienced AEs early on nilotinib after switch from long-term imatinib therapy. These changes were expected and consistent with the safety profile of nilotinib observed in other studies

Drug-Related Adverse Events Nilotinib 400 mg BID n = 101 AEs ( 10%), % Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Headache 17 14 2 0 Pruritis 17 5 1 0 Rash 16 6 1 0 Nausea 10 5 0 0 Fatigue 11 2 1 0 Myalgia 7 4 1 0 Laboratory abnormalities ( 5%), % Increased liver enzymes 9 4 5 0 Increased lipase 3 3 7 1 Increase bilirubin 5 7 1 0 Hypophosphatemia 1 4 2 0 Increased amylase 4 2 0 0 12 month follow-up

Summary By 12 months, 12.5% vs 5.8% of patients achieved confirmed CMR on nilotinib vs imatinib (P =.108) Twice as many patients achieved MR 4, MR 4.5 and CMR on nilotinib Patients remaining on imatinib had minimal evidence of improvement in molecular response Patients switched to nilotinib had a median 0.5-log reduction in BCR-ABL Nilotinib safety profile was consistent with prior studies

Conclusions For patients with ongoing BCR-ABL positivity on imatinib, switching to nilotinib leads to faster, deeper molecular responses Deeper molecular responses on nilotinib may increase patient eligibility for future TKI discontinuation studies Ultimate success of this strategy will be assessed in the discontinuation study ENESTop

ENESTcmr Contributing Investigators Argentina B Moiraghi Australia C Arthur S Durrant J Szer M Hertzberg T Hughes D Joske A Schwarer K Taylor T Mills Brazil PE Dorlhiac Llacer N Clementino N Spector R Pasquini C Souza Canada J Lipton D Forrest B Leber R Delage L Busque France A Guerci-Bresler F Nicolini M Tulliez G Etienne D Rea Spain JL Steegmann S Osorio S del Castillo F Cervantes E Olavarria-Lopez Central Molecular Monitoring Susan Branford Jodi Prime