GLAUCOMA REPEAT READINGS PATHWAY

Similar documents
LOCSU Community Services. Glaucoma Repeat Readings & OHT Monitoring Community Service Pathway. Issued by Local Optical Committee Support Unit May 2009

LOCSU Community Services. Glaucoma Repeat Readings & OHT Monitoring Community Service Pathway. Issued by Local Optical Committee Support Unit May 2009

England. Suspect OHT/Glaucoma. Repeat Readings Service Common Pathway

Clinical Guidance and Monitoring for Change. Cecilia Fenerty MD FRCOphth Manchester Royal Eye Hospital

Community Eye Care Pathway Developments in South Staffs (or: How we Bridge the North/South Divide )

Glaucoma Care Pathway

NICE guideline Published: 1 November 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ng81

Glaucoma: diagnosis and management (large print version)

PRESCRIBING IN GLAUCOMA: GUIDELINES FOR NZ OPTOMETRISTS

Commissioning Guide: Glaucoma (Long Version)

Glaucoma Care Pathway

LOCSU/WOPEC Courses to support the development of local enhanced eye care services. Excellence in Education for Eye Care Professionals

The Common Clinical Competency Framework for Non-medical Ophthalmic Healthcare Professionals in Secondary Care

Costing report. Glaucoma: diagnosis and management of chronic open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Implementing NICE guidance.

Closed Angle Glaucoma Or Narrow Angle Glaucoma. What s is a closed angle type of glaucoma,

ENHANCED SERVICES IN NORTH STAFFS & STOKE Irfan Razvi Vice Chair Staffs LOC (North) Independent Optometrist COSI

Extended services for contact lens opticians: England

Enhanced Scheme Evaluation Project (ESEP) Robert Harper On behalf of the ESEP team

Glaucoma is the most frequent

LOCSU Community Services

Table 1. Details of online literature searches conducted in respect of audits of optometric referrals.

Glaucoma. National Guideline Centre. Glaucoma: diagnosis and management. NICE guideline 81. October Final. Methods, evidence and recommendations

Intro to Glaucoma/2006

2. Dr Ahmad Nasser Affiliations: Foundation Year 2 doctor, NHS West Lothian Foundation Programme, St. Johns Hospital, Livingston, Scotland, UK

Family studies in glaucoma

Manual. Manual Welsh Eye Care Initiative. A Welsh Eye Care Initiative. Protocol. The Assessment and Management of Age-related Macular Degeneration

A service and clinical guide for the Eye Health Examination Wales (EHEW) part of the Wales Eye Care Service (WECS)

Quickfire Audit Session. Quickfire Audits. Sourced and facilitated by. Trevor Warburton Barbara Ryan

The Common Clinical Competency Framework for Non-medical Ophthalmic Healthcare Professionals in Secondary Care

Multidisciplinary Glaucoma Service Design. Paul GD Spry PhD MCOptom DipGlau DipTp(IP) Head of Optometry, Bristol Eye Hospital

Enhanced Scheme Evalua<on Project (ESEP)

CENTRAL MERSEY LOCAL OPTICAL COMMITTEE

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE. Glaucoma: diagnosis and management of chronic open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

The Common Clinical Competency Framework for Non-medical Ophthalmic Healthcare Professionals in Secondary Care

Andrew Francis, MSIII Boston University School of Medicine Unite For Sight Chapter President and Global Impact Volunteer ACCRA, GHANA

THE CHRONIC GLAUCOMAS

Comparative study of new imaging technologies for the diagnosis of glaucoma: Protocol Approved by the Ethics Committee

Glaucoma. College of Optometrists

The Common Clinical Competency Framework for Non-medical Ophthalmic Healthcare Professionals in Secondary Care

1/31/2018. Course Objectives. Diagnostic Testing. Optic Nerve Damage ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF A GLAUCOMA WORK-UP/TONOMETRY TECHNICIAN: -SDP

The Future of Optometric Services in Primary Care in Wales

DERBYSHIRE JOINT AREA PRESCRIBING COMMITTEE (JAPC)

Quality in Optometry Record Card Keeping.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Health and social care directorate Quality standards and indicators Briefing paper

Paediatric Eyecare Update

Glaucoma disc referrals from DESP

THE CHRONIC GLAUCOMAS

Ophthalmology Unit Referral Guidelines

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Health and social care directorate Quality standards and indicators Briefing paper

The innovative aspects are that ORA G3 is currently the only device capable of measuring corneal hysteresis.

Glaucoma Intraocular Pressure What Will I Notice?

Sponsored by. Shared care and referral pathways Part 3: See through cataract referral

abcdefghijklmnopqrstu

Collaboration in the care of glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects. Barry Emara MD FRCS(C) Nico Ristorante November 29, 2012

Glaucoma (update) Consultation on draft scope Stakeholder comments table. 19 May June 2016

Optometric Cataract Refined Referral

Goals. Glaucoma PARA PEARL TO DO. Vision Loss with Glaucoma

Examining the Eyes. Mr. Nicholas Lee Lead Clinician Consultant Ophthalmologist at Hillingdon and The Western Eye Hospitals

pat hways Medtech innovation briefing Published: 15 March 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/mib57

Targeting Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma: a Teaching Case Report 1

Effect of brimonidine on intraocular pressure in normal tension glaucoma: A short term clinical trial

For peer review only. BMJ Open. For peer review only - Journal: BMJ Open

Optometric Learning Network in Greater Glasgow & Clyde

Glaucoma: Diagnostic Modalities

Incidence of manifest glaucoma

amendments to the NHS (General Ophthalmic Services) (Scotland) Regulations 2006 ( the 2006 Regulations ); and

Inadequate diagnostic value of the

Primary Care Cataract Assessment Scheme

e Scottish Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme

Snellen VA 2 IOP 3 Ocular Examination * Only dilate if repeat photos required

Written by Administrator Wednesday, 13 January :27 - Last Updated Thursday, 21 January :34

Cataract Enhanced Scheme (CES):

Phase 3c Topline Results. Page 1

PRACTICAL APPROACH TO MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF GLAUCOMA

Commissioning better eye care

Role of central corneal thickness measurement in management of open angle glaucoma and glaucoma suspects in Calabar, Nigeria

Screening for Uveitis in Children

3/23/2016. Regina Smolyak, MD Glaucoma Service Flaum Eye Institute

Are traditional assessments a waste of time? NZAO 2015

HOW TO MAKE THE MOST OF A NEW OCT. with Kelly Kerksick, OD

DIRECT REFERRAL OF CATARACT PATIENTS COMMUNITY OPTOMETRIST PROTOCOL AND GUIDELINES

pat hways Medtech innovation briefing Published: 19 November 2014 nice.org.uk/guidance/mib14

Cataract Surgery Criteria Based Access Protocol Supporting people in Dorset to lead healthier lives

Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Treatment & Management of Ocular Disease

PREVALENCE OF GLAUCOMA AMONG FISHERMEN COMMUNITY OF MUNDRA TALUKA OF KUTCH DISTRICT- A CROSS- SECTIONAL STUDY

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

GLAUCOMA. phone (64) fax (64) web

Guidance for Optometrists in relation to Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Schemes. June 2004

Is this glaucoma? Leo Semes, OD Michael Chaglasian, OD Danica Marrelli, OD. Optometry s Meeting 2015 Seattle, WA

Speaker Disclosure Statement. " Dr. Tim Maillet and Dr. Vladimir Kozousek have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% Over a 24-Hour Period: A Pilot Study

Behandlungsstrategien beim Offenwinkelglaukom. F. Bochmann, Augenklinik LUKS

Dr Jo-Anne Pon. Dr Sean Every. 8:30-9:25 WS #70: Eye Essentials for GPs 9:35-10:30 WS #80: Eye Essentials for GPs (Repeated)

Medical Management of Glaucoma

Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s NICE quality standard

Downloaded from:

A comparison of HRT II and GDx imaging for glaucoma detection in a primary care eye clinic setting

PedsCases Podcast Scripts

AR CS205 Clinical Pilot Study Topline Results

KEY MESSAGES. Details of the evidence supporting these recommendations can be found in the above CPG, available on the following websites:

Transcription:

GLAUCOMA REPEAT READINGS PATHWAY Level 1a: Goldmann style applanation tonometry repeat readings A first level community service for IOP refinement where other signs of glaucoma are not present will reduce unnecessary referrals to the hospital eye service, reducing patient anxiety and minimising capacity issues within the already overburdened hospital glaucoma clinics. The service will be cost effective with a greater number of patients managed within the primary care setting. Level 1a (Part 1) Patients who are identified as having IOP > 21 mmhg and no other signs of glaucoma during a GOS or private sight test will have immediate slit lamp GAT or Perkins tonometry assuming the optometrist is contracted to provide the service. This service falls within core competencies for optometrists. Outcomes Guidance from the College of Optometrists and the Royal College of Ophthalmologists recommends that the outcome should be dependent on the patient s age and they define certain groups who may not need referral. However, pressures should still be repeated on these groups to ensure that decisions are made based on reliable readings. There are four possible outcomes from this first repeat of pressures: 1. All patients with IOP > 31mmHg should be referred for OHT diagnosis without further IOP refinement 2. Other patients with a pressure of 22-31 need to proceed to Part 2 (2 nd repeat pressure) 3. Pressures which differ between the eyes by 5 mmhg or more should proceed to Part 2 (2nd repeat pressure) 4. All other IOP results are within normal limits and the patient can be discharged. At risk groups should be monitored at appropriate intervals. Level 1a (Part 2) Patient attends for repeat Goldmann or Perkins applanation tonometry on a separate occasion. This repeat will be within 4 weeks of the initial repeat.

Outcomes There are four possible outcomes from repeating this test: 1. Patients who need to be referred for OHT diagnosis based on confirmed IOP result: Age Group < 65 years 65 79 years 80 years + Pressure > 21 mmhg > 24 mmhg > 25 mmhg 2. Patients who can be referred direct to the OHT monitoring service assuming there is a service in place: Age Group 65 79 years 80 years + Pressure 22-24 mmhg 22-25 mmhg NB: The Joint RCOpht/COptom's advice suggest that optometrists might "consider not referring" this group of patients as under the NICE Guidelines they will never need treatment. Whilst this is true, these patients however do still have OHT and need careful monitoring to pick up any signs of progression towards COAG. It is not appropriate to monitor these patients under GOS. These patients are not really in any of the groups specifically covered by NICE but the most appropriate way to deal with them is to make the assumption that the College's advice constitutes the establishment of a "management plan" as per para 1.5.6 of NICE CG85 and monitor these patients as having diagnosed OHT. 3. Where repeat applanation measurements show a consistent difference in pressure of 5 mmhg or more, practitioners may wish to consider whether referral may be appropriate, or whether there is a reasonable explanation (e.g. surgery to one eye). 4. The results are within normal limits and the patient can be discharged. At risk groups should be monitored at appropriate intervals. The criteria for inclusion of patients in level 1a: IOP > 21 mmhg as measured at the sight test following College guidance on technique where NCT is used (4 readings), and no other signs of glaucoma are present.

Level 1b: Visual field repeat readings A first level community service for visual field refinement will reduce unnecessary referrals to the hospital eye service, reducing patient anxiety and minimising capacity issues within the already overburdened hospital glaucoma clinics. The service should be cost effective with a greater number of patients managed within the primary care setting. Patients who are identified as having suspicious visual fields during a GOS or private sight test will have visual fields repeated on a separate occasion (within 4 weeks of initial measurement) assuming the optometrist is contracted to provide the service This service falls within core competencies for optometrists. The visual fields assessment must be at least a supra threshold assessment on Visual fields machine that is able to produce a print out. (FDT is excluded) Outcomes There are three possible outcomes from these tests: 1. The results are within normal limits and the patient can be discharged. At risk groups should be monitored annually under GOS. (This would include the case where there is a defect on the repeat but NOT in the same areas of the visual field as the original defect. Such inconsistent defects are usually due to the patient finding the test difficult and should not, as a rule, lead to referral and further repeats/monitoring may well just add further confusion.) 2. Visual field is suspicious and requires monitoring at appropriate intervals 3. Visual field defect is confirmed and the patient is referred to consultant ophthalmologist. The criteria for inclusion of patients in level 1b Visual field defect which may be due to glaucoma and requires further investigation, and no other signs of glaucoma are present. (Defects caused by old pathology or lens rim artefacts should be excluded.)

Level 1c: Patients from non- participating practices It is anticipated that the majority of optometrists will participate in the Level 1a or 1b pathway if it is commissioned, assuming refresher training is available and funding is appropriate. However a small minority of practices may decide not to sign up to the pathway. Commissioners may look to accredited practitioners to provide referral refinement for patients from non- participating or out- of- area practices. In this case it should be emphasised that the second optometrist assumes clinical responsibility for the detection of the patient suffering from glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Therefore assessment of the optic disc, anterior angle and where appropriate, visual field is necessary. These additional examinations required will take more time and thus a greater remuneration is provided. In these cases non- participating practices should where possible ask the patient to select a participating practice and send the referral details directly to that practice as per local referral protocols. This will enable the patient to experience the most efficient process to receiving the care they need. The criteria for inclusion of patients in level 1c IOP > 21 mmhg as measured at the sight test following College guidance on technique where NCT is used (4 readings), and no other signs of glaucoma are present or visual field defect which may be due to glaucoma and requires further investigation, and no other signs of glaucoma are present. NB: Glaucoma is a very slow developing disease and there is very little risk to the patient in delaying the repeat tests. The reason for repeating the tests on a different occasion is to ensure that factors that may have influenced the patient responses the first time round, particularly in the fields test, will be different. For the purpose of repeat readings, Perkins as well as Goldmann as this will an acceptable form of Goldmann style tonometry. Both are based on the Goldmann principal. This would enable housebound patients to be provided this service as the Perkins tonometer is portable. Referrals Routine referrals Routine referrals are made to the chosen provider automatically from the IT system. There are text boxes you can use to provide more detailed information. Urgent Referrals Urgent referrals should be made in the usual way by phoning the relevant eye department.

Clinical Management Guideline for Glaucoma Repeat Readings 1. Intra- ocular pressure alone (i.e. normal fields and disc appearance) IOP > 21 mmhg by non- contact tonometry at GOS or private sight test and IOP refinement by Goldmann or Perkins tonometry is carried out by the optometrist. Outcomes: All patients with IOP > 31mmHg should be referred for OHT diagnosis without further IOP refinement. Any patients with IOP 21mmHg should be discharged If IOP result is 22-31mmHg, or if there is a difference in IOP of 5 mmhg between the eyes then Goldmann (or Perkins) is repeated on a separate occasion. Second repeat of Goldmann or Perkins tonometry (on a separate day) Outcomes: Any patients with IOP 21mmHg should be discharged If there is a difference in IOP of 5 mmhg between the eyes then practitioners may wish to consider whether referral may be appropriate, or whether there is a reasonable explanation (e.g. surgery to one eye) The following patients are referred for OHT diagnosis: Age Group < 65 years 65 79 years 80 years + Pressure > 21 mmhg > 24 mmhg > 25 mmhg The following patients are referred to the OHT monitoring service if it exists or for OHT diagnosis otherwise: Age Group 65 79 years 80 years + Pressure 22-24 mmhg 22-25 mmhg

2. Visual Field alone (i.e. normal IOP and optic disc appearance) Visual field defect which may be due to Glaucoma found at GOS or private sight test and visual field refinement is carried out by the optometrist on a separate occasion. Outcomes: Field defect consistent on two occasions, patient is referred to consultant ophthalmologist for differential diagnosis or specialist optometrist as per local protocol. Field defect inconsistent or not repeatable patient should be discharged 3. Optic Disc indications Suspicious optic nerve head found at GOS or private sight test. Patient is referred to a consultant ophthalmologist or specialist practitioner as per local protocol 4. Narrow Angle Suspicious anterior chamber angle found at GOS or private sight test. If suspect narrow angle refer to consultant ophthalmologist if symptoms of sub- acute attacks or IOP > 21 mmhg or greater (Van Herick grade 2 or less)