The Latest in HIV Tests: What Do the Results Mean?

Similar documents
1 st and 2 nd Generation EIA

HIV Test Technologies, Best Practices, and New Algorithm. Jenny R. McFarlane DSHS HIV Prevention and Care Branch

Advantages and disadvantages of different types of FDA-approved HIV immunoassays used for screening by generation and platform*

Overview of HIV Testing Practices and Technology

Point-of-care HIV testing

HIV Testing Technology and the Latest Algorithm

Learning Objectives. New HIV Testing Algorithm from CDC. Overview of HIV infection and disease 3/15/2016

New HIV Tests and Algorithm: A change we can believe in

The Evolving Landscape of HIV Prevention and Diagnosis

2018 HIV and HCV Diagnostic Testing Survey

ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo: Moving HIV Diagnostics Forward in the U.S.

Routine HIV Testing Community of Practice Session #2

List the steps in the fourth generation HIV screening algorithm Describe the relationship between rapid HIV antibody tests and the fourth generation

New Generation of Nucleic Acid Testing. Michele Owen, Ph.D Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention Centers for Disease Control & Prevention

Diagnostic Tests for HIV

A Summary of Clinical Evidence

Evolution of HIV Diagnostics. Goals for the 2010 Conference. Bernard M. Branson, M.D. CDC Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention

Clinical Education Initiative TESTING FOR HIV AND HCV: WHAT S CURRENT AND WHAT S COMING. Bernard M.

INTEGRATING HIV AND HCV TESTING

HIV Update in Laboratory Testing. Patricia Slev, PhD, D(ABCC)

HIV/HCV Screening in 2015: Where Are We Now? Bernard M. Branson, M.D.

HIV Serology Quality Assessment Program Summary for Panel HIVSER 2017Apr19

HIV: 2009 DIAGNOSTIC SURVEY FACING NEW CHALLENGES

Diagnosing HIV Infection AMNERIS E. LUQUE, M.D. PROFESSOR OF MEDICINE/INFECTIOUS DISEASES MEDICAL DIRECTOR, PARKLAND HIV SERVICES

Opportunities Created by Diagnostic HCV and HIV Nucleic Acid Tests

SP.718 Special Topics at Edgerton Center: D-Lab Health: Medical Technologies for the Developing World

Adventures in Discordance- HIV Testing

HIV Serology Quality Assessment Program Summary for Panel HIVS Oct22

WHO Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics PUBLIC REPORT. Product: Alere HIV Combo WHO reference number: PQDx

Using all the data: Immunoassay signal-to-cutoff values provide useful information that should be considered in HIV diagnostic

Draft Report WHO evaluation of HIV 1/2 STAT-PAK (Chembio Diagnostic Systems Inc)

HEALTH. Re: Interim Guidelines for Laboratories on the use of a new Diagnostic Testing Algorithm for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection

The Challenges in Developing and Commercializing HIV Tests that are Useful in Differentiating VISP/R VISP/R Workshop Bethesda, MD March 2013

CAPACITY OF THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM TO INCREASE PROVISION OF HIV TESTING

Unigold Recombigen HIV 1/2 Training for HIV Testing Sites. Updated: February 2018 Cicely Richard Office of HIV/AIDS

Arizona State Office of Rural Health Webinar Series

2017 HIV AND HCV DIAGNOSTICS SURVEY REPORT

Rapid HIV Antibody Testing Update

Joanne Stekler, MD, MPH Assistant Professor of Medicine Deputy Director, Public Health Seattle & King County HIV/STD Program

Technical Bulletin No. 104b

Module 3: Overview of HIV Testing Technologies

HIV Serology Quality Assessment Program Summary for Panel HIVSER 2018Apr19

Supplementary Online Content

100 Abbott Park Road Abbott Park, IL Trade Name: ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo Assay Approved Date: 18-JUN-2010

WHO Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics PUBLIC REPORT. Product: DPP HIV 1/2 Assay WHO reference number: PQDx

High Sensitivity HIV Testing and Translational Science around PrEP

2006 HIV Diagnostics Survey

HIV Diagnostic Testing

HOPE Follow-Up Algorithm: Unusual Cases. Urvi Parikh, PhD MTN Virology Core Regional Meeting Lab Breakout Sept 27-28, 2016, Cape Town

NEW CHALLENGES FOR ACCURATE HIV-1 DIAGNOSIS ALL BELGIAN AIDS REFERENCE LABORATORIES KAROLIEN STOFFELS (ARL VUB STP) & FIEN VANROYE (ARL ITM)

CDIA TM Rubella IgG/IgM Rapid Test Kit

HIV Testing. Susan Tusher, LMSW Program Coordinator The Kansas AIDS Education and Training Center

HIV Serology Quality Assessment Program Revised Summary for Panel HIVSER 2017Oct27

WHO Prequalification of Diagnostics Programme PUBLIC REPORT. Product: Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Number: PQDx Abstract

AccuSet HIV-1/2 Performance Panel

HIV Guideline Sakchai Dettrairat

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Antibody Test

AdvaMedDx Value Assessment Framework in Practice

HIV-1 Seroconversion Panel PRB973

Bringing excellence to life

Treponema Pallidum (TP) Antibody Test

AccuVert HIV-1 Seroconversion Panel PRB974 ( )

STARHS/RITA and Misclassification

Complicated viral infections

Susanne Norris Zanto, MPH, MLS (ASCP) CM, SM Montana Public Health Laboratory

AccuSet Anti-HIV-1 Mixed Titer Performance Panel

WHO Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics PUBLIC REPORT. Product: OraQuick HIV 1/2 Rapid Antibody Test WHO reference number: PQDx

Kelly A. Curtis, M. Susan Kennedy, Kevin Delaney, Man Charurat, and S. Michele Owen

WHO Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics PUBLIC REPORT. Product: OraQuick HIV 1/2 Rapid Antibody Test WHO reference number: PQDx

Diagnosis and Management of Acute HIV

APHL/CDC HIV Demonstration Project Demonstration Project for HIV Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) Referral Updated: January 2018

WHO Prequalification of Diagnostics Programme PUBLIC REPORT. Product: HIV 1/2 STAT-PAK Number: PQDx Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis (CHLa)Test Kit

Geenius TM HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay Instructions For Use

The Latest on HIV Testing. Dominika Seidman, MD MAS

AccuSet Anti-HIV-1 Mixed Titer Performance Panel

Model Performance Evaluation Program (MPEP) HIV Rapid Testing Survey: Report of Sample Shipment Results, September 2009

TAP HERE TO SEE THE PRODUCT

WHO Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics Programme PUBLIC REPORT. Product: SURE CHECK HIV 1/2 Assay Number: PQDx

An Evaluation of Qualitative HIV-2 RNA Referral Testing

How are testing technologies used to diagnose HIV infection?

Technical Bulletin No. 104a

The author has received speaker honoraria and travel assistance from Bio-Rad, inc.

Technical Bulletin No. 161

Micropathology Ltd. University of Warwick Science Park, Venture Centre, Sir William Lyons Road, Coventry CV4 7EZ

Which of the Two Make the Best Soul Mate: An Autoantibody, Antibody or Antigen? Maria Crisostomo, September 28, 2018

WHO Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics Programme PUBLIC REPORT. Product: Uni-Gold HIV Number: PQDx Abstract

WHO Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics Programme PUBLIC REPORT. Product: Uni-Gold HIV Number: PQDx Abstract

CEPHIA Consortium for the Evaluation and Performance of HIV Incidence Assays STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Immunologic Methods in Diagnosis of HIV Infection. Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad

WHO Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics Programme PUBLIC REPORT. Product: Alere HIV/Syphilis Duo Number: PQDx

Objectives. Seven days of separation. Clinical situation a transplant. The Donor COOMBS MD PHD 1. Laboratory Diagnosis & Monitoring of HIV Infection

Expression of HIV-1 Markers During Progression of Infection E E E Days Since 1st Bleed

HIV-1 AccuVert TM Seroconversion Panel

HIV Testing: What s New? Kenneth H. Mayer, MD

ANTIBODY SCREENING by Uni-Gold Recombigen HIV

Rapid testing algorithm performance in a low prevalence environment: NJ

Rotavirus Test Kit. Instructions For Use. Format: Cassette Specimen: Fecal Extract Catalog Number: VEL-001-ROTA

High Rate of Missed HIV Infections in Individuals With Indeterminate or Negative HIV Western Blots Based on Current HIV Testing Algorithm in China

Transcription:

The Latest in HIV Tests: What Do the Results Mean? Bernard M. Branson MD Principal Consultant, Scientific Affairs LLC Atlanta, Georgia

Objectives At the end of this workshop, participants will be able to: 1. Compare the relative merits of available point-of-care and labbased HIV tests for different circumstances 2. Describe how recent HIV tests affect the current HIV testing recommendations. 3. Identify the effect that early HIV treatment and PrEP can have on HIV test results 4. State the benefits of Ag/Ab screening for Acute HIV infection

Background and Disclosure of Financial Relationships Dr. Branson previously served as Associate Director for Laboratory Diagnostics in CDC s Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention until October 2014. Dr Branson serves as consultant to the Gilead Sciences FOCUS Program and received compensation from Siemens Healthcare for development of a presentation on HIV diagnostics at an educational symposium.

Use of Brand Names This presentation will describe general principles of HIV tests, and also refer to individual HIV tests by brand name for the purposes of identification and clarity. No endorsement of any specific test is intended. 4

Outline The basics: how tests operate Available HIV tests: rapid, lab, & supplemental Interpreting results How differences between tests relate to accuracy Clinical presentation of Acute HIV Effect of therapy and PrEP on HIV antibody test results 5

What is your role with HIV testing? 1. I order HIV lab tests and give results to patients. 2. I perform rapid HIV tests and interpret the results. 3. Patients are referred to me after they have tested HIVpositive. 4. I manage an HIV testing program. 5. I receive HIV test results reported to surveillance

Which HIV test do you use most? 1. OraQuick oral fluid 2. OraQuick fingerstick blood 3. Clearview Complete/Chembio Sure Check 4. INSTI 5. Determine Combo 6. Uni-Gold Recombigen 7. DPP or Stat-Pak 8. Laboratory-based immunoassay

Evolution of HIV Tests 1 st generation: whole viral lysate, detects IgG antibody 2 nd generation: synthetic peptides, detects IgG antibody 3 rd generation: detect IgM and IgG antibody 4 th generation: detects IgM, IgG antibodies, p24 antigen

1 st and 2 nd Generation EIA Plasma/serum (1 h/37 o C) Plasma/serum IgG HIV antibody Antigen 1 st - Viral lysate 2 nd Recombinant proteins or synthetic peptides Enzymedetection enzyme anti-human IgG Color change with HIV IgG Color reagent

3 rd Generation EIA HIV antibody Plasma/serum IgG IgM Antigen: Recombinant proteins or synthetic peptides Enzymedetection enzyme HIV antigen Color change with HIV IgM or IgG Color reagent

Rapid HIV Tests Designed for results while-you-wait CLIA-waived: Use only direct, unprocessed specimens (whole blood, oral fluid) Minimum technical skills required Insignificant likelihood of erroneous test results Fail-safe mechanism to verify test is working (control) 11

CLIA-waived rapid HIV-antibody tests, 2017 Oraquick Advance DPP HIV 1/2 Chembio Sure Check INSTI HIV 1/2 Chembio Stat Pak Uni-Gold Recombigen

Rapid HIV Tests: Lateral Flow Devices (immunochromatographic) Add Sample Conjugate 1st Test line Control line IgG anti-hiv IgG Antibodies Colloidal gold conjugated to protein A HIV antigen Anti-IgG antibodies

Flow-through devices (immunoconcentration) Microparticles immobilized in membrane form test spots Control antibody: -Anti-IgG -Anti-gold HIV-1 peptide (HIV-2 peptide)

CLIA: Moderate Complexity INSTI Reveal G3 Multispot

Flow-through devices immunoconcentration Specimen: - IgG anti-hiv - IgG antibodies Control zone Anti-IgG Antibodies Test zone HIV Antigens 1st Excess antibodies pass through test membrane

Flow-through devices immunoconcentration Detection agent Rinse Control zone Anti-IgG Antibodies Test zone HIV Antigens Excess detection agent passes through test membrane

Dual Path Platform Conjugate Specimen

DPP HIV Geenius Supplemental

HIV-1: viral antigens and RNA gp120 gp 41 p24 RNA

Which HIV antibodies do rapid tests detect? 1. p24 antibody 2. gp41 antibody 3. gp120 antibody 4. gp41 and gp120 antibody 5. All three: p24, gp41, and gp120

gp41 gp41, 120 gp41, 120 Oraquick Advance DPP HIV 1/2 Chembio Sure Check gp41 INSTI HIV 1/2 gp41, 120 Chembio Stat Pak gp41, 120 Uni-Gold Recombigen

How large a blood specimen? 5 µl Oraquick Advance 10 µl 3 µl DPP HIV 1/2 Chembio Sure Check 50 µl 5 µl INSTI HIV 1/2 Chembio Stat Pak 50 µl Uni-Gold Recombigen

How long does it take? 20-40 min Oraquick Advance 5 + 10-15 (40) min 15-20 min DPP HIV 1/2 Chembio Sure Check 1 min INSTI HIV 1/2 15-20 min Chembio Stat Pak 10-12 min Uni-Gold Recombigen 24

Determine Combo Ag/Ab rapid test Control p24 Antigen Antibody gp41, gp120 - CLIA-waived 2014 - Whole blood (50µL) Determine Combo Ag/Ab Rapid Test 2013 4 th Generation Ag/Ab Combo

Rapid HIV tests can be performed only by: 1. A doctor or nurse. 2. A clinical laboratory. 3. An HIV counselor who has received training. 4. Any of the above. 26

Rapid HIV Test Restrictions Sale is restricted to clinical laboratories that: Have an adequate quality assurance program, and Where there is insurance that operators will receive and use instructional materials. Test is approved for use only by an agent of a clinical laboratory. Test subjects must receive the Subject Information Notice prior to specimen collection. 27

What is Most Frequently Observed CLIA Deficiency? 1. No quality control performed 2. Use of incorrect specimen volume 3. No manufacturer s instructions available 4. Use of expired test kits 28

CLIA requirements: Discussion Current instructions (package insert) on file Quality assurance program Storage and operating temperatures Test result logs Evaluations and proficiency 29

What s new in the lab? 30

HIV-1/2 antigen/antibody immunoassay (+) (-) Negative for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies and p24 Ag HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation immunoassay HIV-1 (+) HIV-1 (-) HIV-1 (+) HIV-1 (-) or indeterminate HIV-2 (-) HIV-1 antibodies detected HIV-2 (+) HIV-2 antibodies detected HIV-2 (+) HIV antibodies detected HIV-2 (-) or indeterminate HIV-1 NAT (+) indicates reactive test result (-) indicates non-reactive test result NAT: nucleic acid test HIV-1 NAT (+) Acute HIV-1 infection HIV-1 NAT (-) Negative for HIV-1

EIA CIA Abbott Architect Ag/Ab Combo 2010 Bio-Rad Ag/Ab Combo EIA 2011 CIA Siemens Advia Centaur CHIV 2015 32

Chemiluminescence Immunoassays Magnetic Micro-Particles Coated with Antigens and antibody Patient Sample LITE Reagent Antigens and antibodies labeled with AE AE Αnti- p24 Monoclonal IgM/IgG p24 Ag AE AE AE 2 Αnti- p24 Monoclonals WASH AE WASH Trigger Solution Chemiluminesce Relative light units

Random Access Multiplatform analyzers for HIV testing On-board Refrigeration of Multiple Different Assays

Random Access Multiplatform analyzers for HIV testing STAT sample requests without pausing Results in <60 minutes

Beads conjugated to HIV-1 Group M and O antigens, HIV-2 antigens, and p24 antibody Bio-Rad Bioplex HIV Ag/Ab Combo Assay Distinguishes between p24 antigen HIV-1 antibodies HIV-2 antibodies Fifth Generation

Lab Test Challenges: Specimen Handling Separate red cells from serum/plasma Limited storage/shipment at room temperature: Abbott Architect 3 days Bioplex 4 days Bio-Rad HIV Combo Ag/Ab EIA 2 days Siemens Advia Centaur 24 hours 37

Cumulative frequency of positive tests Relative Sensitivity during Seroconversion (plasma) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 50% Cumulative Frequency 0.00-50 -40-30 -20-10 0 10 20 30 days before positive Western blot 26 seroconverters were analyzed with 14 tests 17 seroconverters with Positive WB used for cumulative frequency analysis Genprobe Architect 4th BioRad 4th Advia 3rd Vitros 3rd Abbott 3rd BioRad 3rd Insti Multispot Reveal Statpak Complete Unigold Oraq Adv

Sequence of Test Positivity Relative to WB (plasma) 166 specimens, 17 Seroconverters - 50 % Positive Cumulative Frequency APTIMA Bangkok Tenofovir Study: Delayed HIV detection by oral fluid in patients on PrEP Bio-Plex Ag/Ab Combo Architect Ag/Ab Combo Bio-Rad Ag/Ab Combo Advia Centaur Ag/Ab Determine Ag/Ab Combo Advia Centaur Ortho Vitros GS 1/2+O Multi-Spot Reveal G3, SureCheck HIV-1/2 HIV-1/2 STAT-PAK Participants receiving tenofovir (who became HIV-infected) took longer to develop a reactive OraQuick (191.8 days) than participants receiving placebo (16.8 days) INSTI DPP Unigold OraQuick WB positive - Suntharasamai et al, PLoS One 2016 Oral Fluid (Avioq EIA) 25 20 15 10 5 Days before WB positive (50% Cumulative Frequency) Modified from Owen et al, J Clin Micro 2008, Masciotra et al, J Clin Virol 2011, 2013, and 2016 CDC Diagnostics Conference 0 +40 Luo et al, J Clin Virol 2013

CDC Technical Update 10/4/2017 Determine can detect infection earlier than IgM/IgG sensitive (antibody-only) immunoassays when used with plasma. For laboratories in which instrumented antigen/antibody testing is not feasible, Determine can be used with serum/plasma as the first step in the laboratory algorithm. It may not detect infection as early as the instrumented tests. Laboratories using Determine are advised to acknowledge the limitations of the testing procedure when reporting results https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/48472 40

Determine Combo Ag/Ab with Plasma 415 HIV-positive specimens from STOP study of methods to detect acute HIV Infections Architect detected 396 (95%) Determine Combo detected 337 (81.2%) 55 (50%) of 110 Architect reactive, Multispot negative 11 (78.6%) of 14 Acrhitect reactive, Multispot indeterminate 271 (99.6%) of 272 Architect reactive, Multispot positive 20 seroconversion panels Determine Combo Ag/Ab detects HIV sooner than rapid antibody tests -Masciotra et al, J Clin Virol 2017 - Delaney et al, CID 2017

Determine Combo Ag/Ab with Whole Blood In 4 studies involving >25,000 tests, Determine Combo detected only 1 of 37 acute infections. CDC study: seroconversion panels, simulated whole blood: Reactivity significantly higher in plasma (91%) than blood (56%) 8/20 seroconverters showed a median delay of 6 days between Determine Combo reactivity with plasma and reactivity with whole blood - Lewis PLOS One 2015 - Masciotra et al, J Clin Virol 2017 -Stekler et al, J Clin Virol 2017

20 Seroconverters: Simulated Whole Blood vs Plasma Seroconverters 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 whole blood plasma 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days since first HIV-1 RNA positive In eight, median delay of 6 days No delay 43

Sequence of Test Positivity Relative to WB (plasma) 166 specimens, 17 Seroconverters - 50 % Positive Cumulative Frequency APTIMA Bio-Plex Ag/Ab Combo Architect Ag/Ab Combo Bio-Rad Ag/Ab Combo Advia Centaur Ag/Ab Determine Ag/Ab Combo Advia Centaur Ortho Vitros GS 1/2+O Window Period INSTI DPP Multi-Spot Reveal G3, SureCheck HIV-1/2 HIV-1/2 STAT-PAK Unigold OraQuick WB positive 25 20 15 10 5 Days before WB positive (50% Cumulative Frequency) 0 +4 Delaney et al, Clin Inf Dis 2017

HIV RNA (plasma) HIV Ab HIV p24 Ag HIV Infection 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 180 240 Eclipse Period Viral Detection Acute Infection IgM Antibody Detection Recent Infection Days IgG Positive Antibody Western Detection Blot Longstanding Infection 300 360 Seroconversion window

Modeling the Eclipse Period 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations Delaney et al, Clin Inf Dis 2017

Estimated Window Periods of Available HIV Tests Category (No. of Tests) Median Days (Interquartile Range) When can I be sure? 99th Percentile (Days) Antibody/antigen laboratory (4) 17.8 (13.0, 23.6) 44.3 IgG/IgM-sensitive laboratory (3) 23.1 (18.4, 28.8) 49.5 IgG-sensitive rapid screening (6) 31.1 (26.2, 37.0) 56.7 IgG-sensitive supplemental (2) 33.4 (28.5, 39.2) 58.2 Western blot (viral lysate) (1) 36.5 (31.0, 43.2) 64.8 Delaney et al CID, 2017

Retesting Post exposure, after a negative test, retesting is recommended after at least 45 days with an Ag/Ab test on serum/plasma 90 days using with all other HIV tests Offer HIV screening at least annually to all sexually active MSM - https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/testing.html - MMWR August 2017 48

HIV-1/2 antigen/antibody immunoassay (+) (-) Negative for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies and p24 Ag HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation immunoassay HIV-1 (+) HIV-1 (-) HIV-1 (+) HIV-1 (-) or indeterminate HIV-2 (-) HIV-1 antibodies detected HIV-2 (+) HIV-2 antibodies detected HIV-2 (+) HIV antibodies detected HIV-2 (-) or indeterminate HIV-1 NAT (+) indicates reactive test result (-) indicates non-reactive test result NAT: nucleic acid test HIV-1 NAT (+) Acute HIV-1 infection HIV-1 NAT (-) Negative for HIV-1

HIV-1/HIV-2 Differentiation Assays FDA approved, March 2013 FDA approved, Oct. 2014 Serum Control HIV-1 Recombinant gp41 HIV-2 Peptide gp36 Multispot HIV-1/HIV-2 HIV-1 Peptide gp41 Geenius HIV-1/HIV-2

The Geenius TM HIV-1/2 Lines HIV-1 & HIV-2 Associated Lines

Add 5 µl serum/plasma Or 15 µl whole blood

Add 5 drops buffer to Well 2

Insert test cassette in reader for automated interpretation

Geenius Results: Interpretations 1 2 4 5 6 3 7 8

Geenius results not generated previously CDC Technical Update August 2016 1. HIV-2 with HIV-1 cross-reactivity Consider HIV-2 Positive 2. HIV-2 Indeterminate 3. HIV Indeterminate Repeat; negative on repeat, report as negative Repeatedly reactive: Conduct HIV-1 NAT Refer for validated HIV-2 antibody or NAT, or Repeat testing in 2-4 weeks https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/40790 57

HIV-1/2 antigen/antibody immunoassay (+) (-) Negative for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies and p24 Ag HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation immunoassay HIV-1 (+) HIV-1 (-) HIV-1 (+) HIV-1 (-) or indeterminate HIV-2 (-) HIV-1 antibodies detected HIV-2 (+) HIV-2 antibodies detected HIV-2 (+) HIV antibodies detected HIV-2 (-) or indeterminate HIV-1 NAT HIV-1 RNA viral load (+) indicates reactive test result (-) indicates non-reactive test result NAT: nucleic acid test HIV-1 NAT (+) Acute HIV-1 infection HIV-1 NAT (-) Negative for HIV-1

HIV Nucleic Acid Test (NAT) for Diagnosis: Qualitative RNA vs Viral Load APTIMA HIV-1 qualitative RNA assay is the only NAT FDAapproved for diagnosis Under FDA and CLIA regulations, clinicians can order HIV-1 RNA viral load tests, but labs cannot use them as a reflex part of the algorithm

Acute HIV Infection

HIV Ag/Ab Screening, 8 Emergency Departments City Chicago Houston (2) Los Angeles Oakland New Orleans Annual census 48,000 170,000 170,000 85,000 85,000 Months screening 39 15,15 31 21 35 Tests performed 13,170 (338/mo) 65,288 (4,353/mo) 55,422 (1,788/mo) 18,876 (899/mo) 47,544 (1,358/mo) Reactive tests 245 (1.9%) 1,253 (1.09%) 1,019 (1.8%) 119 (0.6%) 405 (0.9%) New HIV Dx 96 (39%) 199 (16%) 234 (23%) 58 (49%) 205 (51%) Acute HIV 13 (14%) 26 (13%) 24 (10%) 10 (8%) 33 (16%) (One hospital from Chicago, one from Philadelphia not in table)

Signs and Symptoms: 122 Patients with Acute HIV Fever 91 (75%) Headache 47 (39%) Gastrointestinal 82 (67%) Pharyngitis 39 (32%) Malaise 69 (57%) Skin rash 16 (13%) Chills 60 (49%) Sweats 16 (13%) Myalgia 52 (43%) Lymphadenopathy 13 (11%) No symptoms/signs 8 (7%) Fever & 3 others 74 (61%)

Reason for Visit: New HIV Diagnoses in the ED Reason for visit Acute HIV N = 98 Established HIV N = 507 Viral syndrome 41 (42%) 33 (6%) Gastrointestinal 22 (22%) 90 (18%) Fever 12 (14%) 17 (3%) Rash 7 (7%) 29 (6%) Trauma 1 (1%) 31 (6%) Musculoskeletal 1 (1%) 28 (6%) Pulmonary 1 (1%) 61 (12%) Requested test 0 (0%) 18 (4%)

New HIV Diagnoses in the ED Acute HIV N = 98 Established HIV N = 507 Viral Load (median) 1,176,913 50,464 CD4 count (median) 349 213 Linked within: 30 days 54 (55.1) 172 (33.9) 90 days 70 (71.4) 280 (55.2) 180 days 73 (74.5) 294 (58.0) Viral suppression within 30 days 3 (3.1) 6 (1.2) 90 days 26 (26.5) 81 (16.0) 180 days 47 (48.0) 162 (32.0)

Identifying Acute HIV Infection Screen with Ag/Ab combination assay Patients often symptomatic High viral load Early treatment beneficial Opportunity to interrupt transmission Empiric and same-day therapy

Cohort of 88 MSM with AHI in Bangkok, Thailand, who initiated ART immediately. After ART, 48/88 (54.6%) attained HIV RNA <50 copies/ml by week 8, increasing to (89.7%), and (97%) at weeks 24 and 48, respectively.

- Keating et al CID, 2016

Effect of ART during Acute HIV gag (p24) env (gp41) - Keating et al CID, 2016

Initiation of ART During Acute HIV Infection Leads to a High Rate of Nonreactive HIV Serology 33% 4% 17% All De Souza et al CID, 2016 RNA+, p24 -, IgM - RNA+, p24+, IgM -

gp41, p24 antibodies gp41 antibodies

Follow-up Testing: Persons on PrEP Every 3 months: HIV Ag/Ab Combo test STI testing Test positivity after infection while on PrEP (resistance or poor adherence) might be delayed or indeterminate HIV-1 RNA not always detectable 72

Quick Case Study 25 year old MSM in an HIV-discordant relationship, on PrEP since 12/2015. Perfect adherence by history. Also had 2 other sex partners. 4th generation testing repeatedly negative until May 2016: Positive 4 th gen, negative Multispot, HIV RNA<20, signal detected Repeat 2 and 4 weeks later: same results.

What would you do next? 1. Tell the patient he is not infected 2. Repeat tests in 6 weeks 3. Order a Western blot 4. Order a genotype

Western blot Patient s WB: bands at gp160 and p55, weak bands at p31, and p24. 2003 study: false-negative Oraquick and waning or absent gp41 titers in patients on early, effective therapy Bangkok tenofovir study Genotype: Multiple drug resistance mutations (including TDF/FTC), virus not related to that of his virally suppressed partner. - O Connell et al, J Clin Micro 2003

50 y/o MSM on PrEP for 8 months Ag/Ab assay reactive; Western blot indeterminate (gp 160 only) RNA undetectable; DNA undetectable Viral load became elevated 3 weeks after stopping PrEP

On the Horizon

Point-of-Care Nucleic Acid Tests Xpert HIV-1 viral load 1 ml plasma Results in 90 minutes LOD 32 copies/ml CE-marked December 2014 GeneXpert Not available in U.S.

Point-of-Care Nucleic Acid Tests 25 µl whole blood specimen Alere q HIV-1/2 Detect HIV-1 or HIV-2 viral load in 60 minutes CE-marked March 2015 Not available in U.S.

Point-of-Care Nucleic Acid Tests Lab in a Tube Influenza A/B FDA cleared Strep A FDA cleared Results in 15 minutes CLIA-waived May 2015 Cobas LIAT PCR HIV under development

Summary HIV tests differ in subtle ways that affect different circumstances RNA & viral load will play an increasingly important role in HIV diagnosis Early treatment and PrEP can lead to non-reactive serology and undetectable RNA Only labs can perform HIV tests If you conduct HIV tests, you are a lab Meet requirements to maintain CLIA certificate of waiver 81