COMPARISON REPORT. For Alex Bradley Working with Gracie Lanza A S S E S S M E N T T O A C T I O N. Tuesday, June 26, This report is provided by:

Similar documents
EVERYTHING DiSC COMPARISON REPORT

EVERYTHING DiSC COMPARISON REPORT

For Alex Bradley Working with Gracie Lee. Wednesday, May 30, This report is provided by:

COMPARISON REPORT. Working with Alex Bradley. Thursday, April 07, This report is provided by:

For Alex Bradley Working with Gracie Lee. Thursday, April 14, This report is provided by:

COMPARISON REPORT. For Gracie Lee Working with Alex Bradley. Friday, January 19, This report is provided by:

Comparison Report For Kathryn Petersen Working with Martin Gilmore

GAINING INSIGHT INTO YOURSELF. Insight... understanding yourself and others. INSIGHT Inventory

The Key to Great Leadership

DiSC PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT

RESEARCH REPORT. EVERYTHING DiSC APPLICATION LIBRARY. Everything DiSC Application Library Research Report

BEHAVIORAL DIFFERENCES TIP SHEET Karlene Belyea, MBA

THE 5-MINUTE PERSONALITY TEST L O G B

Platinum Rule Assessment Do unto others as they d like done unto them.

Research Report. by Inscape Publishing

Project: Date: Presented by: Siegel HR

Behavioral Intelligence

What is Your Behavioral Style?

The. DISCstyles Behavioral Report

Predictive Index Factor Emphasis Combinations

Customer Service Action Planner

Individual Report Debrief Template

PRODUCTIVE CONFLICT PROFILE

DISC AND COMMUNICATIONS.

Different Personalities, Different Needs

ACME Chemical

Factor Insights. Predictive Index, LLC

THE INTEGRITY PROFILING SYSTEM

High Performance Teams

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE TEST-R

ACME Chemical

Distributed by: Chart Your Course International Inc DISC - The Universal Language of Observable Behavior 1

Individual Assessment

How to Manage Seemingly Contradictory Facet Results on the MBTI Step II Assessment

Feeling. Thinking. My Result: My Result: My Result: My Result:

SCHOOLPLACE. Trait Report BIG FIVE PROFILE. A Customized Report for: Sample Person. Date: 06/20/2017. Pierce J. Howard, PhD Jane Mitchell Howard, MBA

KNOWLEDGE THINK. Intro. Lab Coach ASK: What have you done to discover your spiritual gifts? What successes and failures have you encountered?

Communication Styles. Jeff Thomas Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

CAN T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?

SAFETY QUOTIENT. EMPLOYER REPORT For Hiring, Training & Coaching. June 20, Kelly Sample

Negotiating and the Temperaments. Part I

Couple: Ann S & John S PID Style: Strategic Thinker vs Cautious Thinker

Insight Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI)

draft Big Five 03/13/ HFM

Understanding myself and others. Evaluation questions

BIRKMAN REPORT THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR: JOHN Q. PUBLIC (D00112) ANDREW DEMO (G526VC) DATE PRINTED February

The DISC Index WHAT WHY HOW. Parker Wentling. February 4, 2015

TRACOM Sneak Peek Excerpts from. Self-Perception Guide

Secrets to Leading with Assertiveness. Participant Manual

Personal Listening Profile Facilitator Report

Improving Personal Effectiveness With Versatility

Using the Myers-Briggs Instrument with the DiSC

TRACOM Sneak Peek. Excerpts from CONCEPTS GUIDE

Motivational Interviewing in Healthcare. Presented by: Christy Dauner, OTR

SAFETY QUOTIENT. PARTICIPANT REPORT For Self-Coaching & Self-Awareness. May 25, Sample Report - John Doe

Developing Yourself to Your Highest Potential

Personality I.D. Comparison Report. Bill R & Chuck F PID Style: Harmonizer & Cautious Thinker. Alet Strydom

The bars represent the strength of preference of the candidate for the given scale.

A Powerful Way to Understand People An introduction of the DISC concept By Robert A. Rohm, Ph.D. Everyone is not like you!

DiSCProfile.com s Everything DiSC Summer Activity Book. Let s get going with Everything DiSC! Courtesy of

SAMPLE. Coaching Report for. Sally Sample. This Sample Report provided by:

Sample Report. Sample Report Report. Fa c i l i tat or s (05/13) 180

JOE BLOGGS 22 Mar 2017 Character DNA SAMPLE REPORT

Developing Highly Effective People

Please complete the first two pages before the Webinar

Lauren Nichols Style: Networker. Personality I.D. Individual Report. Individual Report. Tuesday, November 27, :04:05 PM

JUNIOR SEMINAR 3: MYERS-BRIGGS TYPE INDICATOR MARC TUCKER

Dr. Coakley, so virtual colonoscopy, what is it? Is it a CT exam exactly?

CONCEPTS GUIDE. Improving Personal Effectiveness With Versatility

REPORT PREPARED FOR: Roger Plate REPORT DATE: November 05, 2009

USING ASSERTIVENESS TO COMMUNICATE ABOUT SEX

Behavioral EQ MULTI-RATER PROFILE. Prepared for: By: Session: 22 Jul Madeline Bertrand. Sample Organization

Working with Clients with Personality Disorders. Core Issues of All Personality Disorders. High Conflict Personality Disorders

IT S A WONDER WE UNDERSTAND EACH OTHER AT ALL!

The DISC Index WHAT WHY HOW. Michael Venske. January 5, 2015

Development. summary. Sam Sample. Emotional Intelligence Profile. Wednesday 5 April 2017 General Working Population (sample size 1634) Sam Sample

Succeeding with Others

Scott Fowler April 9, 2016

Choosing Life: Empowerment, Action, Results! CLEAR Menu Sessions. Health Care 3: Partnering In My Care and Treatment

Research Report for Adaptive Testing Assessment

HARRISON ASSESSMENTS DEBRIEF GUIDE 1. OVERVIEW OF HARRISON ASSESSMENT

A Helping Model of Problem Solving

Research Report for Adaptive Testing Assessment

TRADE SECRET INFORMATION

Sleep Better. Program Workbook

Favorite world: Do you prefer to focus on the outer world or on your own inner world? This is called Extraversion (E) or Introversion (I).

ENHANCED. Multi-Rater U N I V E R S A L. Profile SOCIAL STYLE. Prepared for: Jane Style Highlands Ranch, CO. By: TRACOM Group.

When People Explode! Crisis Intervention and De-Escalation Techniques for Everyday Survival

This is a large part of coaching presence as it helps create a special and strong bond between coach and client.

THE DISC UNDERSTANDING PEOPLE PUZZLE

DISC Profile Report. Alex Engineer. Phone: or

What is stress? Stress is an emotional/ bodily reaction to

PMINJ Chapter May 5 th Symposium Communicating in Color: Turn Conflict into Collaboration & Results!

CREATIVE EMPATHETIC PLANFUL. Presented in Partnership With

Transcription:

COMPARISON REPORT A S S E S S M E N T T O A C T I O N. For Alex Bradley Working with Lanza Tuesday, June 26, 2012 This report is provided by: White Space Consulting, LLC Heidi J Greer CEO / Senior Consultant Karen Greer President / Consultant www.white-spaceconsulting.com info@whitespaceconsulting.net 303.906.4804 by Inscape Publishing

Welcome Back to Everything DiSC Alex, this report is designed to help you better understand Lanza and to build a more effective working relationship with her. All of the information is derived from the responses that you and gave when answering your Everything DiSC profiles. Once again, you ll be using the Everything DiSC Map. Here s a quick refresher on the four DiSC styles. People with the Dominance (D) style tend to be Direct Results-oriented Firm Strong-willed Forceful People with the Influence (i) style tend to be Outgoing Enthusiastic Optimistic High-spirited Lively People with the Conscientiousness (C) style tend to be Analytical Reserved Precise Private Systematic People with the Steadiness (S) style tend to be Even-tempered Accommodating Patient Humble Tactful Remember, no DiSC style is better or worse than any other, and every style adds something important to an effective working relationship. Reproduction in any form, in whole or in part, is prohibited. Alex working with 2

How and Fit on the Everything DiSC Relationship Map DiSC Style Comparison The eight words shown around the Everything DiSC Relationship Map shown below are priorities that people use in their work that affect their relationships with others. If you ve completed an application-specific Everything DiSC Profile (such as Management or Sales), these priorities will look slightly different. However, the basic motivations and preferences of the DiSC styles remain consistent. Our research shows that these eight words are useful in describing how our style preferences affect relationships. Lanza : id Style emphasize Action, Enthusiasm, and Results, which are priorities that doesn t share. Most likely, you tend to be more adventurous, high-spirited, and driven. D Dominance i Influence : C Style emphasizes Accuracy, Stability, and Challenge, which are priorities that you don t share. Most likely, she tends to be more systematic, cautious, and questioning. C Conscientiousness S Steadiness Understand Each Other s Priorities Because s style is C, she values Accuracy and prefers an analytical environment. This isn t one of your top priorities, and you re more likely to focus on rallying others around a common cause with your Enthusiasm. also places a high priority on Stability, so she s likely to focus on follow-through and approach decisions cautiously., on the other hand, probably tend to be more Action-oriented and spontaneous. Finally, is likely to Challenge new ideas, and she may come across as questioning and skeptical. In contrast, you may focus more energy on driving toward quick Results. As you can see by the map above, your positions on the map are very far apart, which means that your DiSC styles are Very Dissimilar. This doesn t necessarily mean that the two of you don t have anything in common, or even that you will have any problems working together. The next pages will give you an opportunity to explore your similarities and differences, and to see how these might translate to strengths or challenges when you work with. Reproduction in any form, in whole or in part, is prohibited. Alex working with 3

Instructions r Similarities and Differences OK, Alex. In this section, we ll explore how you and compare on six different pairs of traits. These traits were chosen for you and from a variety of traits that are measured by your DiSC assessment. These six pairs of traits were found to be most significant for your relationship with, and this will hopefully lead to a meaningful dialogue between the two of you. 's report includes the same information, but written from her perspective. Each page will include the following three steps: 1) DISCOVER how you and fit on the trait continuum. For each pair of traits, you ll receive a continuum that shows where you and each fall, which is clearly labeled with your names and two dots (black for you, white for ). ll also receive a paragraph that interprets the placement of your two dots. Here s an example of a trait continuum: Daring Careful 2) PERSONALIZE the information by selecting from several bullet points. Next, you will read a list of three bullet points that further explain how this pair of traits might play out in your relationship. Read the list and personalize your feedback and 's feedback by: Putting a next to statements you agree with, Putting an X next to statements that you don t agree with, and Putting a? next to statements you aren t sure about Adding your own statements next to the blank bullets 3) APPLY what you ve learned and gain some helpful tips. Finally, you will receive questions and a list of tips that are customized based on where you and each fall on the trait continuum. These questions can be used for self-discovery, or you and can choose to complete this section together as a dialogue. The Tips for Working with are practical ideas that you might try to increase effectiveness with in this area. may find that differences are sometimes a healthy part of your relationship, while at other times, they can cause tension. Likewise, your biggest similarities can also pose both benefits and challenges. Reproduction in any form, in whole or in part, is prohibited. Alex working with 4

Daring vs. Careful r Similarities and Differences Daring Careful re daring; is careful Alex, compared to, you re much more likely to embrace bold ideas and gamble on big payoffs. As a result, you probably encourage innovation and seek important breakthroughs. However, she tends to be cautious, so she may find your approach to be somewhat reckless. While you may see her as risk-averse or overly conventional, remember that her focus on predictable and safe results can keep unpleasant surprises to a minimum. Tends to see change as invigorating Tends to pitch fresh ideas and new approaches May come across as reckless at times 's Tendencies Tends to see major changes as risky or stressful Tends to rely on well-tested methods and solutions May come across as closed-minded at times How accurately does the feedback on this page describe the differences in your approach to risk-taking? How do your differences affect your relationship or your ability to work together effectively, and what could you do to make improvements? Tips for Working with Avoid insisting that your plan is better just because it s new and adventurous. Consider her legitimate objections to riskier aspects of your ideas. Remember that she dislikes moving forward with a plan until she s sure it will work. Reproduction in any form, in whole or in part, is prohibited. Alex working with 5

Soft-spoken vs. Forceful r Similarities and Differences Soft-spoken Forceful re forceful; is soft-spoken Alex, compared to, you re more likely to be outspoken about your preferences. r assertive approach may ensure that your opinion is heard and that there is no confusion about where you stand. However, she may feel it s difficult to be heard when you advocate strongly for your position, while you may become frustrated at her hesitancy to speak up. Remember that her modest approach probably prevents disagreements from getting too heated. Tends to take the lead in group settings Tends to push strongly for his position May come across as opinionated or outspoken 's Tendencies Tends to shy away from leading discussions Tends to withhold her opinion unless directly asked for it May come across as unassertive at times How accurately does the feedback on this page describe the differences in your levels of assertiveness? How do these differences affect your relationship or your ability to work together effectively, and what could you do to make improvements? Tips for Working with Avoid dominating discussions or talking over her. Encourage her to share her opinions. Refrain from forcing her to accept your ideas. Reproduction in any form, in whole or in part, is prohibited. Alex working with 6

Calm vs. Energetic r Similarities and Differences Calm Energetic re energetic; is calm Alex compared to, you tend to prefer a faster, livelier pace to get a quicker turnaround. Most likely, you enjoy making decisions on the fly, while may prefer a more methodical, controlled pace to ensure reliable results. At times, you may become frustrated with her cautious pace, while she may think that you overlook important details. Tends to prefer working at a rapid pace Tends to be energized by flurries of activity and quick turn-around times 's Tendencies Tends to prefer working at a measured pace Tends to dislike last-minute deadlines or sudden changes May come across as too hasty at times May come across as overly cautious at times How accurately does the feedback on this page describe the differences in your pace? How do your differences in pace affect your relationship or your ability to work together effectively, and what could you do to make improvements? Tips for Working with Work together to set timelines that you re both comfortable with. Make an effort to match her more methodical pace when situations call for caution or accuracy. Let her know when you feel strongly that more urgency is called for. Reproduction in any form, in whole or in part, is prohibited. Alex working with 7

Tactful vs. Frank r Similarities and Differences Tactful Frank re frank; is tactful Alex, compared to, you re much more likely to be frank when communicating. Because you don t like to beat around the bush, you may help to surface important issues more quickly. tends to be a lot less direct and probably chooses her words carefully to avoid offending others. She may be taken aback by your frankness, while you may wish that she would speak her mind more often. Tends to get right to the point and say exactly what s on his mind 's Tendencies Tends to find the most diplomatic way to convey information Tends to not hold back his thoughts and feelings Tends to hold back certain thoughts and feelings May come across as blunt or insensitive at times May come across as vague or indirect at times How accurately does the feedback on this page describe the differences in your levels of directness? How do these differences affect your relationship or your ability to work together effectively, and what could you do to make improvements? Tips for Working with Take time to think through your message before presenting important information to her. Gently encourage her to be more candid with you if she seems to be withholding something. Pay attention to her reactions to gauge the impact of your words. Reproduction in any form, in whole or in part, is prohibited. Alex working with 8

Skeptical vs. Accepting r Similarities and Differences Skeptical Accepting re somewhat skeptical; is skeptical Alex, you and both tend to take a questioning approach when presented with new information, though she may be slightly more skeptical than you are. Because the two of you like to have proof, you probably ask a lot of critical questions, and you may experience tension when one of you challenges the other s ideas. While your similar approaches may help you to uncover potential problems, you may occasionally be less open to each others ideas. Tends to be somewhat questioning of other people s ideas Tends to consider that things could go wrong May come across as a bit too questioning at times 's Tendencies Tends to question and test other people s ideas Tends to anticipate and plan for what could go wrong May come across as overly critical at times How accurately does the feedback on this page describe the similarities in your questioning approach? How does this skeptical approach affect your relationship or your ability to work together effectively, and what could you do to make improvements? Tips for Working with Avoid getting caught up in over-analysis when you disagree. Explain the rationale for any concerns you may have. Choose your battles when working with her, and try to give her the benefit of the doubt from time to time. Reproduction in any form, in whole or in part, is prohibited. Alex working with 9

Accommodating vs. Strong-willed r Similarities and Differences Accommodating Strong-willed re strong-willed; is somewhat strong-willed Alex, you and are both persistent about your opinions, though you may be slightly more strong-willed than she is. Because you share this trait, you may butt heads at times, even over what could be considered trivial issues. While this tenacity may lead to some tension in your relationship, you can rest assured that any issues you and discuss will be fully explored. Tends to overlook advice and input from others 's Tendencies Tends to be hesitant to consider advice and input from others Tends to hold tightly to his own ideas Tends to be fairly committed to her own ideas May come across as stubborn at times May come across as a bit stubborn at times How accurately does the feedback on this page describe the similarities in your tendency to be strongwilled? How does this affect your relationship or your ability to work together effectively, and what could you do to make improvements? Tips for Working with Initiate an open discussion of your positions rather than digging in your heels. Suggest constructive ways to evaluate your differences, such as listing pros and cons. Choose your battles carefully, and look for opportunities to compromise. Reproduction in any form, in whole or in part, is prohibited. Alex working with 10

Summary and Action Plan Action Planning Rank r Traits Rank your six pairs of traits by MOST (#1) to LEAST (#6) IMPORTANT to improve the effectiveness of your relationship with. Ranking Trait re daring; is careful re forceful; is soft-spoken re energetic; is calm re frank; is tactful re somewhat skeptical; is skeptical re strong-willed; is somewhat strong-willed Next, consider comparing your rankings with 's rankings. If you like, work together to choose 2-3 pairs of traits to focus on to make your relationship more effective. CIRCLE these 2-3 pairs in the table above. Create a Personal Action Plan Using the previous section as a reference, list specific action items that you can take to make improvements for each of the pairs of traits you d identified. may require an additional sheet of paper. Trait My Action Item(s) Reproduction in any form, in whole or in part, is prohibited. Alex working with 11