AP STATISTICS 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Similar documents
AP STATISTICS 2006 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B) Question 5

AP STATISTICS 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

AP STATISTICS 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP STATISTICS 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP STATISTICS 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP STATISTICS 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

AP STATISTICS 2013 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP STATISTICS 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

2011 AP STATISTICS FREE-RESPONSE QUESTIONS (Form B)

AP STATISTICS 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Student Performance Q&A:

AP Psychology. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Free Response Question 1. Scoring Guideline.

Level Descriptor of Strands and Indicators 0 The work does not reach a standard outlined by the descriptors below. 1-2

Welcome to this series focused on sources of bias in epidemiologic studies. In this first module, I will provide a general overview of bias.

AP Biology 2004 Scoring Commentary Form B

Modeling Unconscious Gender Bias in Fame Judgments: Finding the Proper Branch of the Correct (Multinomial) Tree

European Federation of Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry (EFSPI)

Psychology 2015 Scoring Guidelines

Regression Discontinuity Design

Lecture Week 3 Quality of Measurement Instruments; Introduction SPSS

AP PSYCHOLOGY 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

FSA Training Papers Grade 4 Exemplars. Rationales

Chapter 13. Experiments and Observational Studies

Basis for Conclusions: ISA 230 (Redrafted), Audit Documentation

11-3. Learning Objectives

Metabolic Biochemistry GST and the Effects of Curcumin Practical: Criterion-Referenced Marking Criteria Rubric

Item Writing Guide for the National Board for Certification of Hospice and Palliative Nurses

Psychological testing

2.75: 84% 2.5: 80% 2.25: 78% 2: 74% 1.75: 70% 1.5: 66% 1.25: 64% 1.0: 60% 0.5: 50% 0.25: 25% 0: 0%

6 th Force & Motion Summative Assessment Scoring Rubrics

Math Released Item Algebra 2. Percent False Positives VF866689

Other potential bias. Isabelle Boutron French Cochrane Centre Bias Method Group University Paris Descartes

Write your identification number on each paper and cover sheet (the number stated in the upper right hand corner on your exam cover).

Chapter 13 Summary Experiments and Observational Studies

Are the likely benefits worth the potential harms and costs? From McMaster EBCP Workshop/Duke University Medical Center

Clever Hans the horse could do simple math and spell out the answers to simple questions. He wasn t always correct, but he was most of the time.

QUARTERLY REPORT PATIENT SAFETY WORK PRODUCT Q J A N UA RY 1, 2016 MA R C H 31, 2016

Measurement and Descriptive Statistics. Katie Rommel-Esham Education 604

Accepted refereed manuscript of:

Myers Psychology for AP*

FSA Training Papers Grade 7 Exemplars. Rationales

ARE THE RESULTS VALID?

Multilevel analysis quantifies variation in the experimental effect while optimizing power and preventing false positives

Running Head: TRUST INACCURATE INFORMANTS 1. In the Absence of Conflicting Testimony Young Children Trust Inaccurate Informants

AMERICAN BOARD OF SURGERY 2009 IN-TRAINING EXAMINATION EXPLANATION & INTERPRETATION OF SCORE REPORTS

Screening for Disease

Test 1C AP Statistics Name:

Reliability, validity, and all that jazz

1. What is the I-T approach, and why would you want to use it? a) Estimated expected relative K-L distance.

Scientific Method in Biology

AP Psychology. Scoring Guidelines

CASE STUDY 2: VOCATIONAL TRAINING FOR DISADVANTAGED YOUTH

Response to Navigant Consulting, Inc. Commentary

The comparison or control group may be allocated a placebo intervention, an alternative real intervention or no intervention at all.

Statistical Significance and Power. November 17 Clair

Practitioner s Guide To Stratified Random Sampling: Part 1

An analysis of the use of animals in predicting human toxicology and drug safety: a review

Chapter 6. Methods of Measuring Behavior Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind. 1

T M S C A M I D D L E S C H O O L N U M B E R S E N S E R E G I O N A L T E S T M A R C H 9,

individual differences strong situation interactional psychology locus of control personality general self-efficacy trait theory self-esteem

The Research Process: Coming to Terms

A Clinical Evaluation of Various Delta Check Methods

VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW IN BRIEF

Technical Specifications

A framework for predicting item difficulty in reading tests

CHAPTER 2 APPLYING SCIENTIFIC THINKING TO MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS

Comparison of safety and cost of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy Bowen C P R, Whitney L R, Truwit J D, Durbin C G, Moore M M

Checking the counterarguments confirms that publication bias contaminated studies relating social class and unethical behavior

AP WORLD HISTORY 2015 SCORING GUIDELINES

GRADE. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. British Association of Dermatologists April 2014

A typology of polytomously scored mathematics items disclosed by the Rasch model: implications for constructing a continuum of achievement

Improving Individual and Team Decisions Using Iconic Abstractions of Subjective Knowledge

AS PSYCHOLOGY. 7181/2 Psychology in Context Report on the Examination June Version: 1.0

Blame the Skilled. Introduction. Achievement Motivation: Ability and Effort. Skill, Expectation and Control

Experimental Psychology

Abstract Title Page Not included in page count. Title: Analyzing Empirical Evaluations of Non-experimental Methods in Field Settings

On Lie Detection Wizards

Investigation for quality of claimed randomised controlled trials published in China

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION ALGEBRA II SCORING KEY AND RATING GUIDE

Description of components in tailored testing

Supplement 2. Use of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs)

Phase B 5 Questions Correct answers are worth 10 points each.

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION INTEGRATED ALGEBRA

Exemplar for Internal Assessment Resource Physics Level 1

Pinball Car Race Online Task

A cost analysis of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of esophageal cancer Harewood G C, Wiersema M J

SRI LANKA AUDITING STANDARD 530 AUDIT SAMPLING CONTENTS

University of Groningen. Fracture of the distal radius Oskam, Jacob

A comparison of endotracheal intubation and use of the laryngeal mask airway for ambulatory oral surgery patients Todd D W

Setting The setting was secondary care. The economic study was carried out in the USA.

The validity of inferences about the correlation (covariation) between treatment and outcome.

Health technology Prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in BRCA1-positive or BRCA2-positive patients.

A-2050 Ethics Analysis Essay. Squadron Officer School

Addiction, Pain, & Public Health website -

Cambridge Pre-U 9773 Psychology June 2013 Principal Examiner Report for Teachers

European Commission request to the European Food Safety Authority for scientific advice on:

Magnetic resonance angiography for the nonpalpable testis: a cost and cancer risk analysis Eggener S E, Lotan Y, Cheng E Y

NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM

Study population Patients with intermittent claudication or critical ischaemia due to an iliac arterial stenosis.

The Regression-Discontinuity Design

Transcription:

AP STATISTICS 2008 SCING GUIDELINES (Form B) Question 2 Intent of Question The primary goals of this question were to assess a student s ability to (1) recognize an unbiased estimator and explain why the estimator is unbiased and (2) compare two estimators with respect to center and variability. Solution Part (a): Statistics A, C, and D appear to be unbiased. This is indicated by the fact that the mean of the estimated sampling distribution for each of these statistics is about 75, the value of the true population parameter. Part (b): Statistic A would be a better choice because it appears to be unbiased. Although the variability of the two estimated sampling distributions is similar, statistic A would produce estimates that tend to be closer to the true population parameter value of 75 than would statistic B. Part (c): Statistic C would be a better choice because it has smaller variability. Although both statistic C and statistic D appear to be unbiased, statistic C would produce estimates that tend to be closer to the true population parameter value of 75 than would statistic D. Scoring Parts (a), (b), and (c) are each scored as essentially correct (E), partially correct (P), or incorrect (I). Part (a) is scored as follows: Essentially correct (E) if the response contains the following two components. Component 1: Identifies statistics A, C, and D as the unbiased estimators. Component 2: Clearly demonstrates an understanding of the meaning of the term unbiased. That is, states that the mean (or center) of each distribution is about 75. No other characteristic (e.g., shape, spread) should be mentioned in the response unless it clearly is discounted as a criterion for being unbiased. Partially correct (P) if the response contains just one of these components. That is, the response either identifies statistics A, C, and D as the unbiased estimators but gives a weak or no explanation or includes some discussion of another characteristic (e.g., shape, spread) as of some importance in judging bias demonstrates clear understanding of the meaning of the term unbiased but identifies only one or two of statistics A, C, and D as unbiased estimators. Incorrect (I) otherwise.

Part (b) is scored as follows: AP STATISTICS 2008 SCING GUIDELINES (Form B) Question 2 (continued) Essentially correct (E) if the response gives a clear explanation that statistic A is the better choice because it is centered at 75. (It is not necessary that the term unbiased be used as long as the response clearly addresses the center. It is not necessary to mention that statistics A and B both have about the same variability.) Note: Students who were penalized in part (a) for mentioning other characteristics should not be repenalized in part (b). Partially correct (P) if the response shows an understanding that centering is an important issue in determining which statistic is better but either does not apply the concept correctly communicates the explanation poorly. Incorrect (I) otherwise. Part (c) is scored as follows: Essentially correct (E) if the response gives a clear explanation that statistic C is the better choice based on the fact that it has less variability. (It is not necessary to mention that statistics A and B are both centered at the parameter.) Partially correct (P) if the response shows an understanding that variability is an important issue in determining which statistic is better but either does not apply the concept correctly communicates the explanation poorly. Incorrect (I) otherwise. 4 Complete Response 3 Substantial Response All three parts essentially correct Two parts essentially correct and the other part partially correct Part (a) and one other part essentially correct and the remaining part incorrect 2 Developing Response Part (a) essentially correct and one of the other parts partially correct All three parts partially correct Part (a) partially correct and one of parts (b) and (c) essentially correct

1 Minimal Response AP STATISTICS 2008 SCING GUIDELINES (Form B) Question 2 (continued) One part essentially correct and the other parts incorrect Two parts partially correct and the other part incorrect Part (a) incorrect, one of the other parts essentially correct, and one part partially correct

2008 The College Board. All rights reserved.

2008 The College Board. All rights reserved.

2008 The College Board. All rights reserved.

AP STATISTICS 2008 SCING COMMENTARY (Form B) Question 2 Sample: 2A Score: 4 In part (a) this strong response correctly defines an unbiased estimator as one in which the mean of its sampling distribution must equal the [population] parameter and then explains why statistics A, C, and D apparently are unbiased estimators. Part (a) was scored as essentially correct. For parts (b) and (c), the student defines a good estimator as being both unbiased and with low variability. Thus, although both statistics have about the same variability, statistic A is the better choice in part (b) because the mean of its estimated sampling distribution is closer to 75. Part (b) was scored as essentially correct. Although the estimated sampling distribution of both statistics have a mean of about 75, the student indicates that statistic C is the better choice in part (c) because its distribution has less variability. Part (c) was scored as essentially correct. The whole answer, with all three parts correct, was judged a complete response. Sample: 2B Score: 3 In part (a) this response gives the correct reason for selecting statistics A, C, and D as being the apparently unbiased estimators. Part (a) was scored as essentially correct. The choice of statistic A in part (b) is right, with an acceptable explanation, so part (b) was scored as essentially correct. The choice of statistic C in part (c) is also correct, but the reason for this choice is not clear. The two distributions are described separately, but no comparison is made between the two. Part (c) was scored as partially correct. The overall answer was deemed a substantial response. Sample: 2C Score: 2 This clearly written response does not reflect an understanding of the definition of an unbiased estimator. It includes the correct criterion in part (a) but also incorrectly implies in the explanation and by selecting only statistic A that normality is a second necessary requirement. Parts (b) and (c) are well done. Because part (a) was worth as much as parts (b) and (c) combined, this answer was considered a developing response.