Brånemark System Facts & Figures

Similar documents
Brånemark System Facts & Figures

Replace Facts & Figures

Implant osseointegration and successful restoration

During the last 30 years, endosseous oral

Evaluation of Patient and Implant Characteristics as Potential Prognostic Factors for Oral Implant Failures

Fixed full-arch implant-supported acrylic resin prostheses

The Self-tapping and ICE 3i Implants: A Prospective 3-Year Multicenter Evaluation

Since the early 1980s, when the concept of

The Brånemark osseointegration method, using titanium dental implants (fixtures)

Case study 2. A Retrospective Multi-Center Study on the Spiral Implant

A Long-term Retrospective Analysis of Survival Rates of Implants in the Mandible

Implants- immediate restoration of postextraction edentation both esthetically and functionally

Etiology, risk factors and management of implant fractures

Retrospective Cohort Study of the Clinical Performance of 1-Stage Dental Implants

Areview of recent studies concerning molar. Single Molar Replacement with a Progressive Thread Design Implant System: A Retrospective Clinical Report

Mandibular implant-supported hybrid prostheses

A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns

Initially, Brånemark System (Nobel Biocare AB,

The evaluation of long-term treatment results for

The restoration of partially and completely

Analysis of Short-term Success Rate and Healing Patterns of Implantium Implant

The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry

Endosseous dental implants initially showed very

The main objective in the treatment of edentulous

John P. Zarb, BA, DDS George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

Many of the problems reported by conventional

Implant treatment in patients with severely

Case study 40. Use of narrow implants for restoration of missing anterior teeth. Dr. Amir Gazmawe

There are many longitudinal investigations

A retrospective study on separate single-tooth implant restorations to replace two or more consecutive. maxillary posterior teeth up to 6 years.

JOMI on CD-ROM, 1990 Mar ( ): The Applicability of Osseointegrated Oral Imp

BIOMECHANICS AND OVERDENTURES

Bernt Andersson, DDS, Odont Dr/PhD;* Sibel Bergenblock, DDS; Björn Fürst, DDS; Torsten Jemt, DDS, Odont Dr/PhD

G03: Complications 12/7/2013 8:00AM 4:30PM

A Multicenter Report on 1,022 Consecutively Placed ITI Implants: A 7-Year Longitudinal Study

While the protocol for direct bone-to-implant

(Please note that Abstracts, reviews, case reports, technique descriptions, animal and in vitro tests are excluded)

Over the last decades, the use

The Use of Alpha-Bio Tec's Narrow NeO Implants with Cone Connection for Restoration of Limited Width Ridges

CIC Edizioni Internazionali. Patient satisfaction with oral implant rehabilitation: evaluation of responses to a questionnaire

Single-Tooth Implants and Their Role in Preserving Remaining Teeth: A 10-Year Survival Study

The use of two interforaminal implants to retain/

Influence of Patient Age on the Success Rate of Dental Implants Supporting an Overdenture in an Edentulous Mandible: A 3-year Prospective Study

Orthodontic aspects of the use of oral implants in adolescents: a 10-year follow-up study

The biologic predictability of dental implants has

Mechanical and technical risks in implant therapy.

The Importance of Implant Surface Characteristics in the Replacement of Failed Implants

Zurich Open Repository and Archive. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns

Comparative Evaluation of Bone in Mandibular Implant Retained Overdentures Using Delayed and Immediate Loading Protocol: An In-Vivo Study

Retrospective Analysis of Dental Implants Placed and Restored by Advanced Prosthodontic Residents

Rehabilitation of a Patient with Completely Edentulous Maxillary Arch using All on 4 Concept of Implantation

Over the years, many different implant systems

The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry

Complication incidence of two implant systems up to six years: a comparison between internal and external connection implants

The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers

Practice-Based Evidence from 29-Year Outcome Analysis of Management of the Edentulous Jaw Using Osseointegrated Dental Implants

EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/24/14 REVISED DATE: 04/23/15, 04/28/16, 06/22/17, 06/28/18 POLICY NUMBER: CATEGORY: Dental

THE EFFECT OF ABUTMENT HEIGHT ON SCREW LOOSENING IN SINGLE IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES AFTER DYNAMIC CYCLIC LOADING

Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures with two Different Implant Designs. Ibrahim R. Eltorky

In recent years, the use of dental implants with a

Evaluation of peri-implant tissue response according to the presence of keratinized mucosa Abstract Purpose: Materials and methods Results:

Abutment Screw Loosening in Single-Implant Restorations: A Systematic Review

9. Literaturübersicht

Rehabilitation of an Edentulous Patient with Implant Supported Overdenture

Evaluation of supported overdenture by implant and magnet

Single tooth replacement

Following the introduction of osseointegration

SECTION 5. Does the Type of Implant Prosthesis Affect Outcomes for the Completely Edentulous Arch?

KNOWLEDGE AND ACCEPTANCE OF DENTAL IMPLANT TREATMENT IN GENERAL PUBLIC IN DELHI POPULATION

Single Tooth Replacement by Morse Taper Connection Implants: A Retrospective Study of 80 Implants

Occlusal Principles and Considerations for Implants: An Overview

It is well-known that osseointegrated implants do not

Early implant failure. Prognostic capacity of Periotest s : retrospective study of a large sample

WORKSHOP ON THE STATE OF THE SCIENCE OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY. Chicago August 2006

Medical interventions involving surgical procedures

The treatment of the completely edentulous mandible

The majority of the early research concerning

Social changes, evolution in dentistry, and changes

Immediate Loading of Single-Tooth Implants in the Posterior Region

Treatment of edentulous patients by means of

A systematic review of survival of single implants as presented in longitudinal studies with a follow-up of at least 10 years

The high clinical success rate of endosseous

The proven effectiveness of prosthetic treatment

Clinical UM Guideline

Stress Distribution in Natural Tooth and Implant Supported Removable Partial Denture with Different Attachment Types: A Photoelastic Analysis

Guided Implant Surgery and Extraction Sockets. Silvio Mario Meloni Giacomo De Riu Milena Pisano Antonio Tullio

Cumulative survival rate and associated risk factors of Implantium implants: A 10-year retrospective clinical study

Cost-effectiveness of Mandibular Two-implant Overdentures and Conventional Dentures in the Edentulous Elderly

in the topic of tooth-implant supported

At present, there are several

The Longitudinal Clinical Effectiveness of ITI Solid-Screw Implants in Partially Edentulous Patients: A 5-Year Follow-up Report

Implants are a part of IMPLANT TREATMENT IN AN URBAN GENERAL DENTISTRY RESIDENCY PROGRAM: A7-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE STUDY CLINICAL

MULTIDIRECTIONAL APPROACH OF ORAL REHABILITATION WITH IMPLANTS IN A PATIENT WITH LIMITED MOUTH OPENING: A CASE REPORT

CHAPTER 1. General Introduction

The simplicity of the low-profile attachments

Lifelong Craniofacial Growth and the Implications for Osseointegrated Implants

Interproximal Papilla Levels Following Early Versus Delayed Placement of Single-Tooth Implants: A Controlled Clinical Trial

Implant supported mandibular overdenture - a literature review of costs, maintenance and patient satisfaction

INTRODUCTION TO DENTAL IMPLANTOLOGY HISTORY OF DENTAL IMPLANTS EUGENIA PROKOPETS, DDS LSU PERIODONTICS

The Influence of Controlled Occlusal Overload on Peri-implant Tissue. Part 3: A Histologic Study in Monkeys

Transcription:

Brånemark System Facts & Figures Brånemark System is synonymous with the revolution in dental care by the introduction of safe and effective implants. Professor Brånemark, its inventor, always put the patient in focus and secured the outcome by meticulous clinical evidence. The first patient was treated in 1965, and Brånemark System is today the most used and documented implant system on the market. More than 1000 articles, published in scientific journals, report on the use and the excellent outcome of Brånemark System implants. A dominating position In a published review 7 on prospective, long-term clinical studies, Brånemark System had a dominating position; more than 50% of the reviewed articles reported on studies performed with Brånemark System implants. Long-term clinical studies evaluating more than 2600 patients The reference table below shows an overview of some of the Brånemark System long-term studies with at least 5 years of follow-up. The references are divided according to indication areas; i.e., full-arch, partial and single-tooth replacements. Table. Overview of cumulative survival/success rates (CSR). Values based on small sample sizes (<20 implants) are not reported (NR) in the table. Reference Prosth. F-up CSR (implants) CSR (prostheses) mand max mand max Full arch replacements Adell R et al 1990 (Group III) FB 5 y 99% 92% 99% 98% Adell R et al 1990 (Group I) FB 15 y 86% 78% 99% 93% Attard NJ & Zarb GA 2004 OD 15 y 96% 100% Attard NJ & Zarb GA 2004 FB 20 y 87% 84% Bergendal T & Engquist B 1998 OD 5 y 100% 75% - - Eliasson A et al 2000 FB 5 y 99% - - - Ericsson I et al 2000 FB 5 y 100% - - -

Ekelund JA et al 2003 FB 20 y 99% - 100% - Friberg B et al 1997 FB 5 y 100% 87% 97% Hemmings KW et al 1994 OD 5 y 93% - - - Jemt T 1994 FB 5 y - 92% - 96% Jemt T et al 2002 FB 5 y - 93% - 95% Naert I et al 1998, 1999 OD 5 y 99% - 100% - Watson RM et al 1997 OD 5 y 72% 100% 78% Åstrand P et al 2004 FB 5 y 95% - Örtorp A et al 2004 FB 5 y 99.5% 100%* 89% 97%* 100% 100%* 95% 96.5%* Partial replacements Attard N et al 2003 FPD 8 y 92% 89% Eckert SE et al 1998 FPD 5 y 96% 96% - - Gunne J et al 1999 FPD 10 y 88% - 82.5% - Jemt T & Lekholm U 1993 FPD 5 y 97% 100% Jemt T et al 2003 (Group A) FPD 5 y 99% 100% 97.5% Lekholm U et al 1994 Lekholm U et al 1999 FPD FPD 5 y 10 y 92% 90% 86.5% Wyatt CCL & Zarb GA 1998 FPD 5 y 97% Zarb GA & Schmitt A 1993 FPD 5 y 92% 98% - - Zarb GA & Schmitt A 1993 FB/OD 5 y 89% 100% 100%

Single tooth replacements Andersson B et al 1998 CeraOne 5 y NR 98.5% NR 94 % Andersson B et al 1998 CeraOne 5 y - 100% - 97% Bianco G et al 2000 CeraOne 5 y 95% 96% - - Henry PJ et al 1996 Polizzi G et al 1999 Single tooth abut Single tooth abut 5 y NR 97% - - 5 y 93% - Scheller H et al 1998 CeraOne 5 y NR 98% NR 91 % FB, Fixed bridge; OD, Overdenture; FPD, Fixed partial denture; *: The reference includes 2 study groups. References 1 Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark P-I, Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-59. 2 Andersson B, Ödman P, Lindvall A-M, Brånemark P-I. Cemented single crowns on osseointegrated implants after 5 years: Results from a prospective study on CeraOne. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:212-8. 3 Andersson B, Ödman P, Lindvall A-M, Brånemark P-I. Five-year prospective study of prosthodontic and surgical single-tooth implant treatment in general practices and at a specialist clinic. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:351-5. 4 Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: The Toronto experience. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:352-9. 5 Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant-fixed prostheses: The Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:417-24. 6 Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant overdentures: The Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:425-33. 7 Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant therapy reported in prospective longitudinal studies of 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29 (suppl 3):197-212. 8 Bergendal T, Engquist B. Implant-supported overdentures: A longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:253-62. 9 Bianco G, Di Raimondo R, Luongo G, Paoleschi C, Piccoli P, Piccoli C, Rangert B. Osseointegrated implant for singletooth replacement: A retrospective multicenter study on routine use in private practice. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:152-8. 10 Carlsson GE, Lindquist LW, Jemt T. Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:295-302. (See also reference Ekelund JA et al 2003) 11 Eckert SE, Wollan PC. Retrospective review of 1170 endosseous implants placed in partially edentulous jaws. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:415-21. 12 Ekelund JA, Lindquist L, Carlsson G, Jemt T. Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: A prospective study on Brånemark system implants over more than 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:602-8. 13 Eliasson A, Palmqvist S, Svenson B, Sondell K. Five-year results with fixed complete-arch mandibular prostheses supported by 4 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:505-10. 14 Ericsson I, Randow K, Nilner K, Peterson A. Early functional loading of Brånemark dental implants: 5-year clinical follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:70-7.

15 Friberg B, Nilson H, Olsson M, Palmquist C. MkII: the self-tapping Brånemark implant. 5-year results of a prospective 3-center study. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8:279-85. 16 Gunne J, Åstrand P, Lindh T, Borg K, Olsson M. Tooth-implant and implant supported fixed partial dentures: a 10- year report. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:216-21. 17 Hemmings KW, Schmitt A, Zarb GA. Complications and maintenance requirements for fixed prostheses and overdentures in the edentulous mandible: A 5-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:191-6. (See also reference Attard NJ & Zarb GA 2004) 18 Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D, Krogh PHJ, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:450-5. 19 Jemt T. Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A five-year follow-up report. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994;5:142-7. 20 Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath M R, Hutton J E, Johns R B, McKenna S, McNamara D C, van Steenberghe D, Taylor R, Watson R M, Herrmann I. A 5-year prospective multi-center follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:291-8.(See also reference Watson RM et al 1997) 21 Jemt T, Bergendal B, Arvidson K, Bergendal T, Karlsson U, Lindén B, Rundcrantz T, Wendelhag I. Implant-supported welded titanium frameworks in the edentulous maxilla: A 5-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:544-8. 22 Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: A 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:635-40. 23 Jemt T, Henry P, Lindén B, Naert I, Weber H, Wendelhag I. Implant-supported laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks in the partially edentulous jaw: A 5-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:415-21. 24 Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I, Bolender C, Folmer T, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Laney WR, Lindén U. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:627-635. 25 Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Lindén U, Bergström C, van Steenberghe D. Survival of the Brånemark Implant in partially edentulous jaws: A 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:639-45. 26 Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:329-36. (See also reference Ekelund JA et al 2003) 27 Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:170-7. 28 Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, Van Steenberghe D. A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:195-202. 29 Olsson M, Gunne J, Åstrand P, Borg K. Bridges supported by free-standing implants versus bridges supported by tooth and implant. A five-year prospective study. Clin Oral Impl Res 1995;6:114-21. (See also reference Gunne J et al 1999) 30 Polizzi G, Fabbro S, Furri M, Herrmann I, Squarzoni S. Clinical application of narrow Brånemark System implants for single-tooth restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:496-503. 31 Scheller H, Pi Urgell J, Kultje C, Klineberg I, Goldberg PV, Stevenson-Moore P, Alonso JMN, Schaller M, Corria RM, Engquist B, Toreskog S, Kastenbaum F, and Smith CR. A 5-year multicenter study on implant-supported single crown restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:212-8. 32 Watson RM, Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath MR, Hutton JE, Johns RB, Lithner B, McKenna S, McNamara DC, Naert I, Taylor R. Prosthodontic treatment, patient response, and the need for maintenance of complete implantsupported overdentures: An appraisal of 5 years of prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:345-54. 33 Wyatt CCL, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:204-11. 34 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part I: Surgical results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:451-7; Part II: The prosthetic results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:53-61; Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-94. (See also reference Attard Nj & Zarb GA 2004)

35 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. Osseointegration and the edentulous predicament. The 10-year-old Toronto study. Br Dent J 1991;170:439-44. (See also reference Attard NJ & Zarb GA 2004) 36 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in anterior partially edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:180-8. 37 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in posterior partially edentulous patients. Int J Proshtodont 1993;6:189-96. 38 Åstrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Gröndahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:413-20. 39 Örtorp A, Jemt T. Clinical experiences of computer numeric control-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: A 5-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:199-209.