Kavitha Yaddanapudi Stony brook University New York

Similar documents
Current and Future Imaging Trends in Risk Stratification for CAD

Team members: Felix Krainski, Besiana Liti, William Lane Duvall (ASNC member)

The 2016 NASCI Keynote: Trends in Utilization of Cardiac Imaging: The Coronary CTA Conundrum. David C. Levin, M.D.

Which Test When? Avoid the Stress of Stress Testing. Marc Newell, MD, FACC, FSCCT Minneapolis Heart Institute

Potential recommendations for CT coronary angiography in athletes

Imaging ischemic heart disease: role of SPECT and PET. Focus on Patients with Known CAD

New Stable Chest Pain Guidance in the UK NICE to have, difficult to implement

Evidence-Based Management of CAD: Last Decade Trials and Updated Guidelines

Is computed tomography angiography really useful in. of coronary artery disease?

Cardiac CT Angiography

Hybrid cardiac imaging Advantages, limitations, clinical scenarios and perspectives for the future

Relationship between body mass index, coronary disease extension and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Optimal testing for coronary artery disease in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients

FFR in Multivessel Disease

Patient referral for elective coronary angiography: challenging the current strategy

Women and Vascular Disease

Chest Pain in Women ;What is Your Diagnostic Plan? No Need for Noninvasive Test

The Emerging Role of Cardiac CT in Cardiovascular Imaging. Anthony Gemignani, MD Vermont Cardiac Network April 28, 2016

Stable Angina: Indication for revascularization and best medical therapy

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Coronary Ca Score

Overview. Health and economic burden of coronary artery disease (CAD) Pitfalls in care of patients suspected of having CAD

Women and Coronary Artery Disease:

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY of SOUTH CAROLINA

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)

Chest pain and troponins on the acute take. J N Townend Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham

Intervention: How and to which extent is technology helping us?

CARDIAC IMAGING FOR SUBCLINICAL CAD

Impact of coronary atherosclerotic burden on clinical presentation and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease

Since 1980, obesity has more than doubled worldwide, and in 2008 over 1.5 billion adults aged 20 years were overweight.

CT or PET/CT for coronary artery disease

I have no financial disclosures

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection

Impact of Chest Pain Protocol Targeting Intermediate Cardiac Risk Patients in an Observation Unit of an Academic Tertiary Care Center

Advanced Imaging MRI and CTA

BENEFIT APPLICATION BLUECARD/NATIONAL ACCOUNT ISSUES

The Role of Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Coronary Atherosclerosis

Εξελίξεις και νέες προοπτικές στην καρδιαγγειακή απεικόνιση CT. Σταμάτης Κυρζόπουλος Ωνάσειο Καρδιοχειρουργικό Κέντρο

Short and Long Term Prognosis after Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring

The activity. Suggested Answers

FFR-CT Not Ready for Primetime

Clinical Features and Subtypes of Ischemic Stroke Associated with Peripheral Arterial Disease

Using Coronary Artery Calcium Score in the Quest for Cardiac Health. Robert J. Hage, D.O.

Multimodality Imaging in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in the Peripartum Period

2/20/2013. Why use imaging in CV prevention? Update on coronary CTA in 2013 Coronary CTA for 1 0 prevention: pros and cons Are we there yet?

Evaluating Clinical Risk and Guiding management with SPECT Imaging

Unnecessary hospitalisation and investigation of low risk patients presenting to hospital with chest pain

Heart disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized nations. It accounts for nearly 40% of all deaths in the United

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Reducing the Population Health Burden of Cardiovascular Disease

Hidden coronary disease in carotid patients

Multisclice CT in combination with functional imaging for CAD. Temporal Resolution. Spatial Resolution. Temporal resolution = ½ of the rotation time

High Value Evaluation of Chest Pain. Zoom Tips

MD F A F C A C MAS A N S C

Coronary Artery Calcium. Vimal Ramjee, MD FACC The Chattanooga Heart Institute

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 50, No. 11, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /07/$32.

Focus on Acute Coronary Syndromes

CASE from South Korea

CT FFR: Are you ready to totally change the way you diagnose Coronary Artery Disease?

Chief CT Technologist Pacific Radiology Christchurch. Radiologist & Director Christchurch Radiology Group Christchurch

FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE: STANDARD OF CARE

Calcium scoring Clinical and prognostic value

MINIMIZING RADIATION EXPOSURE

Computer Aided Detection and Diagnosis: Cardiac Imaging Applications

Welcome! To submit questions during the presentation: or Text:

Multidetector CT Angiography for the Detection of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. Rani K. Hasan, M.D. Intro to Clinical Research July 22 nd, 2011

Cardiac CT saves money and time as first-line heart test 4/1/2008

FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE Step-by-step measurement, Practical tips & Pitfalls

Combining Coronary Artery Calcium Scanning with SPECT/PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Chest pain management. Ruvin Gabriel and Niels van Pelt August 2011

RAMA-EGAT Risk Score for Predicting Coronary Artery Disease Evaluated by 64- Slice CT Angiography

Disclosures. GETTING TO THE HEART OF THE MATTER WITH MULTIMODALITY CARDIAC IMAGING Organ Review Meeting 25 September. Overview

FAME STUDY: 2-year Follow-Up & CLINICAL SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

Low-dose and High-resolution Cardiac Imaging with Revolution CT

The presenter does not have any potential conflicts of interest to disclose

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: CORONARY CALCIUM SCORING

New Insight about FFR and IVUS MLA

The NICE chest pain guideline 1 year on. Jane S Skinner Consultant Community Cardiologist The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

CT Perfusion. U. Joseph Schoepf, MD, FAHA, FSCBT MR, FSCCT Professor of Radiology, Medicine, and Pediatrics Director of Cardiovascular Imaging

Fundamentals, Techniques, Pitfalls, and Limitations of MDCT Interpretation and Measurement

Test in Subjects with Suspected CAD Anatomic Study is Better

Dr. Suzanne Steinbaum Director, Women and Heart Disease Lenox Hill Hospital New York

The radiation dose in retrospective

Coronary Artery Calcium Score

The Value of Stress MRI in Evaluation of Myocardial Ischemia

Richard Grocott Mason

Use of Nuclear Cardiology in Myocardial Viability Assessment and Introduction to PET and PET/CT for Advanced Users

FFR Incorporating & Expanding it s use in Clinical Practice

Benoy N Shah 1,2,3, Gothandaraman Balaji 1, Abdalla Alhajiri 1, Ihab Ramzy 1, Shahram Ahmadvazir 1 & Roxy Senior 1,2,3

5. Cardiovascular Disease & Stroke

Medical Policy. Medical Policy. MP Computed Tomography to Detect Coronary Artery Calcification

Bayes Theorem and diagnostic tests with application to patients with suspected angina

Troponin = 35. Objectives. Low Risk Chest Pain. Does this patient have ACS? Does this patient have ACS? Objectives

Screening for Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease: When, How, and Why?

Investigating the Frequency of Atherosclerosis Risk Factors in Patients Suffering from X Syndrome

Prof. Samir Morcos Rafla Alexandria Univ. Cardiology Dept.

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Pushing the limits of cardiac CT. Steven Dymarkowski Radiology / Medical Imaging Research Centre

Ischemic Heart Disease Mortality, Morbidity and Risk Factors of Coronary Care Unit Patients

MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient F. Mut, J. Vitola

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 42, No. 5, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /03/$30.

Transcription:

Kavitha Yaddanapudi Stony brook University New York

8 million ER visits a year for chest pain 2-10% have Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) Coronary CTA(CCTA) -safe alternative to standard of care (SOC) and reduced length of stay (ROMCAT II, CT-STAT) No missed ACS in large studies Normal CCTA no 2yr MACE In our institution we perform between 5 and 10 CCTA s from ER in 16 hr/day coverage

Death from CAD is higher in women than in men (1). 1 in 3 women die form CAD compared to 1 in 5 from cancer (CDC) Mortality and morbidity are higher in women than men after acute myocardial infarction. Vaccarino et al premenopausal women early myocardial infarction mortality rate was more than twice that for agematched men (6.1% vs. 2.9%; p 0.001). Angina prevalence is higher in women than men with a ratio of 1.2:1 (2). On conventional catheter coronary angiography however women have shown to have lower incidence of obstructive coronary artery disease (3).

CONFIRM study has shown increased risk of mortality with obstructive and non obstructive CAD especially in younger patients and women with multivessel disease (high hazards ratio) Non obstructive CAD in symptomatic women-risk of 16% for adverse events compared to 9% in no CAD (WISE study) CAD in women unfortunately is under diagnosed and undertreated (Circ 2005) Awareness of heart disease risk is underrecognised in womenonly 54% know the significant risk Fewer than 1 in 5 doctors know that women more than men die of CAD each year (3)

The focus on obstructive disease for therapeutic outcomes is a possible cause for adverse outcomes in women (JACC Oct 2009) Need for assessment of the burden of CAD in womenspecifically non obstructive disease Role of CCTA-identify non obstructive disease in symptomatic women with high IHD events who may benefit from medical treatment (AHA consensus statement 2014)

High sensitivity and specificity Is a mirror to the burden of epicardial coronary artery disease and calcium burden Normal CCTA has been shown to have good prognosis on prior large studies (JACC 2011) With newer machines and protocols decreased radiation dose typically <5 msv Faster investigation and turn around times In the ER setting decreases LOS, saves money and time Great risk stratification tool

Acute chest pain No known coronary artery disease With one or more risk factors Without ischemic electrocardiographic (ECG) changes No elevated initial troponin Requiring further risk stratification.

We retrospectively evaluated premenopausal symptomatic women who underwent CCTA with the purpose of evaluating the burden of CAD in this population Retrospective evaluation the CCTA and the medical records in 498 premenopausal female patients who presented to our ER with acute chest pain and underwent CCTA between 2010-12. Risk factors evaluated were age, family history, diabetes, hypertension, obesity (BMI), hyperlipidemia and smoking (current, former or never).

CCTA results were categorized as normal, nonobstructive (<50% stenosis), borderline (around 50%) and obstructive coronary artery disease CAD (includes moderate and severe obstruction >50%). CCTA was interpreted by 2 expert readers at different time points We used Chi square test to examine marginal association between a categorical risk factor and CAD further evaluation with multivariable regression analysis

Age range is 22-55 yrs. 498 patients - a total of 106 (21%) had CAD - 85 (17.07 %) had non obstructive CAD -11(2.2%) had obstructive CAD -10 (2%) had borderline obstructive CAD. Increasing age was associated with higher incidence of CAD ( p 0.0070 )with no CAD on CCTA in females <35yrs.

Patients who never smoked and who had quit smoking >1year had a similar risk of CAD (18.75 and 18.99 %) compared to current smokers who had twice the risk of CAD( 36.3%). Hypertension (p 0.004), hyperlipidemia (p 0.05), family history (p0.01), diabetes (0.0001) and obesity (p 0.0001), were significantly associated with presence of CAD on CCTA. The significant independent risk factors for presence of CAD were age (p = 0.0043), diabetes (p=0.0236) and obesity (p=0.0014) based on multivariable regression analysis.

The prevalence of CAD in premenopausal females presenting to the ER with chest pain is 21.2 % as diagnosed by CCTA. This is 4 times higher compared to a general population prevalence of 0.6-5.6% ( AHA in 2013). ROMCAT II 42% abnormal CCTA in women with 5% obstructive disease, however mean age was higher 55+-7 yrs. The risk factors strongly associated with presence of CAD and a positive CCTA were increasing age, diabetes and obesity.

No functional component No end organ or perfusion changes on routine CCTA Downstream testing is higher Higher radiation dose than SOC Studies non diagnostic

Radiation dose from prospectively gated CCTA ranges between 3-5 msv Concern for breast dose especially in young females Breast is one of the most radiosensitive organs Weighting factor for breast has been increased in 2008 as a reflection of detrimental effects of breast radiation from.05 to.12 (ICRP 2008). Dose can be reduced by shielding and displacement devices (Foley, et al. AJR 2011) Dose from CCTA is equal to a year of background radiation

Doses in msv EHJ 2011

There is a high burden of CAD as detected by CCTA in young females presenting with chest pain to the ER, who might traditionally go undiagnosed for years Other non invasive testing will not reveal the disease burden in these patients The burden of CAD in these women as identified on CCTA can guide further medical management We hypothesize this disease burden as identified on CCTA accounts for a portion of the under diagnosed CAD in addition to microvascular disease that is contributing to the worse overall outcome.

Women under 35 years of age have very low incidence of CAD and given detrimental effects of breast radiation should be carefully screened before preforming CCTA Women >35 years of age can undergo CCTA when symptomatic to further risk stratify the patients resulting in better medical management both acute and long term Stringent scan related precautions in all young females is mandatory to decrease the radiation dose burden.

Stony Brook Medicine Core Lab for partial funding of this project