SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL. Journal: Clinical Drug Investigation

Similar documents
Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab for treatment of Crohn s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Biologics for Ulcerative Colitis

New treatment options in IBD: today and the future. Silvio Danese Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy

Outline. Biologic Drugs in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Dr. Jason Etzel MD The Vancouver Clinic. Biologic Drugs. Biologic Drugs. Biologic Drugs Anti-TNF

Center for Evidence-based Policy

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody for maintenace of remission in Crohn s disease (Review)

An Update on the Biologic Treatment for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. David A. Schwartz, MD

Cimzia shows duration of response up to week 26 in moderate to severe Crohn s patients who failed the intravenous infusion treatment infliximab.

Biologic Therapy for Inflammatory. Is Top-Down Too Top-Heavy? S. Devi Rampertab, MD, FACG, AGAF Associate Professor of Medicine University of Florida

DRAFT. Remission rates, calculated using observed case (OC) analyses were as follows: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 All patients 62.

Biologic Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis in 2015

Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha 저해제가결핵발생에미치는영향

1. Comparative effectiveness of vedolizumab

Positioning New Therapies

Are Biologicals Safe Enough?

Moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis

STELARA (ustekinumab) Clinical Study Report CNTO1275CRD3001

Cimzia. Cimzia (certolizumab pegol) Description

Carefirst.+.V Family of health care plans

Update on Biologics in Ulcerative Colitis. Scott Plevy, MD University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC

Cimzia. Cimzia (certolizumab pegol) Description

Treatment Options. Suresh Pola, MD Kaiser San Diego

Cimzia. Cimzia (certolizumab pegol) Description

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 26 August 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta352

The Medical Letter. on Drugs and Therapeutics

SYNOPSIS. Issue Date: 25 Oct 2011

Severe IBD: What to Do When Anti- TNFs Don t Work?

September 12, 2015 Millie D. Long MD, MPH, FACG

Gionata Fiorino VEDOLIZUMAB E IBD. Un nuovo target terapeutico

Indirect costs of inflammatory bowel diseases: Crohn s disease and ulcerative colitis. A systematic review

How do I choose amongst medicines for inflammatory bowel disease. Maria T. Abreu, MD

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report Final R&D/15/1054. (For National Authority Use Only)

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report Final R&D/15/1093. (For National Authority Use Only)

Cimzia (certolizumab pegol) Data Showed Broad and Rapid Relief From Burden of Symptoms In Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 25 February 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta329

TNF-alpha inhibitors for ankylosing spondylitis(review)

Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume: Page:

Case Example: Exposure Response to Support Extrapolation of Efficacy in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative Colitis Therapy. Faculty Disclosure. Acknowledgements 28/11/2013. Amy Morse November 30/13

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab R&D/04/118. (For National Authority Use Only) Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume:

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 3 October 2012

Opinion 24 July 2013

Efficacy and Safety of Treatment for Pediatric IBD

Emerging g therapies for IBD: A practical approach to positioning. Sequential Therapies for IBD

Azathioprine for Induction and Maintenance of Remission in Crohn s Disease

PRIOR AUTHORIZATION REQUEST GUIDE

Indications for use of Infliximab

Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disorder

Drug Class Review Targeted Immune Modulators

New Cimzia data, with sites in the US, demonstrate safety and efficacy, increased participation in social activities for adult RA patients

Medical Therapy for Pediatric IBD: Efficacy and Safety

Infliximab may be considered medically necessary as first-line therapy (ie, initial treatment) for the following condition:

Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disorder

Carelirst.+.V Family of health care plans

Optimizing Therapies for Severe Ulcerative Colitis October 19, 2014

Humira. (adalimumab) Drug Update Slideshow NEW INDICATION

Regulatory Status FDA-approved indication: Humira and Amjevita are tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers indicated for the treatment of: (2-3)

London, 1 June 2006 Product name: REMICADE Procedure number: Remicade-H-240-II-73-AR SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION 1/8

Vedolizumab: policing leukocyte traffic

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Crohn s Disease Treatment with Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab After Failure of Tumor Necrosis Factor-a Antagonist

Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Corporate Medical Policy

Remicade. Remicade (infliximab), Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb) Description

Disclosures. What Do I Do When Anti-TNF Therapy Is Not Working Anymore? Fadi Hamid, M.D. Saint Luke s GI Specialists

Emerging Therapies in IBD 2006

CADTH CANADIAN DRUG EXPERT COMMITTEE FINAL RECOMMENDATION

Treating inflammatory bowel disease

ENTYVIO (VEDOLIZUMAB)

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION. London, 26 April 2007 Product name: Humira/Trudexa Procedure number: EMEA/H/C/ /II/33

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 26 January 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta375

Remicade. Remicade (infliximab), Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb) Description

Drugs and Applicable Coding: J-code: Enbrel-J1438; Humira-J0135; Remicade-J1745; Inflectra-Q5102; Cimzia-J0718; Simponi-J1602 Renflexis - pending

Selection and use of the non-anti- TNF biological therapies: Who? When? How?

Drug Class Prior Authorization Criteria Therapeutic Agents in Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases

Biologics in IBD. Brian P. Bosworth, MD, NYSGEF Associate Professor of Medicine Weill Cornell Medical College

Review Article A Meta-Analysis of Adalimumab for Fistula in Crohn s Disease

o Your healthcare provider should test you for TB before starting CIMZIA.

62 HUMIRA (ADALIMUMAB) 62 Forecast assumptions 66 Humira forecast Bibliography 70 LIALDA (MESALAZINE MMX) 71 Lialda forecast

Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis second or third line

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies (MOOSE): Checklist.

Biologic Immunomodulators Prior Authorization with Quantity Limit Program Summary

Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report Final R&D/17/0360

Criteria Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria. despite treatment with csdmards, NSAIDs, and/or previous anti-tnf therapy and/or

Personalized Medicine. Selecting the Right First-line Biologic Agent. Gene Expression Profiles Crohn s Disease. The Right Treatment

ENTYVIO (vedolizumab)

Study No.: ADF Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study

Choosing and Positioning Biologic Therapy for Crohn s Disease: (Still) Looking for the Crystal Ball

IBD Updates. Themes in IBD IBD management journey. New tools for therapeutic monitoring. First-line treatment in IBD

Remicade and Friends What You Need to Know Treating the Patient on TNF-alpha Inhibitors and Related Meds

CIMZIA (certolizumab pegol)

Practical Risk Management Tools for Patients with IBD. Garth Swanson MD Rush University Medical Center

COPYRIGHT. Inflammatory Bowel Disease What Every Clinician Needs to Know. Adam S. Cheifetz, MD. Director, Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

ENTYVIO (VEDOLIZUMAB)

Synopsis (C0168T37 ACT 1)

Public observer slides

non commercial use only Supplementary 1 Search result

Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) for psoriatic arthritis second line

Northern Treatment Advisory Group. Biologic drugs for treatment-refractory moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis

Transcription:

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Journal: Clinical Drug Investigation Title: Safety profile of biologic drugs in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Paweł Moćko (P.M.) 1, Paweł Kawalec (P.K.) 1, Andrzej Pilc (A.P.) 1,2 1 Drug Management Department, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland 2 Department of Neurobiology, Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland Corresponding author: Paweł Kawalec MD, PhD Address: Drug Management Department, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University, ul. Grzegórzecka 20, 31-531 Kraków, Poland. Phone: +48 12 424 13 90; fax: +48 12 421 74 47; e-mail: pawel.kawalec@uj.edu.pl

Supplementary material Table 1. MeSH subject headings and EMTREE keywords used in constructed search strategy for the primary studies Keywords (Combined with Boolean operator(s), OR/AND) Medical condition Intervention I (UC, CD) Intervention II (UC) Intervention III (UC, CD) Intervention IV (UC, CD) Intervention V (CD) Methodological limits Language limits Ulcerative Colitis OR Colitis Ulcerosa OR Colitis Ulcerativa OR Ulcerous Colitis OR Ulcerative Colorectitis OR Colitis Ulcerosa Chronica OR Chronic Ulcerative Colitis OR Chronic Ulceration OR Idiopathic Proctocolitis OR Ulcerative Procto Colitis OR Ulcerative Proctocolitis OR Histiocytic Ulcerative Colitis OR Mucosal Colitis OR Colitis Gravis Crohn's Disease OR Crohn Disease OR Crohns Disease OR Colon Crohn Disease OR Colonic Crohn Disease OR Crohn's Enteritis OR Regional Enterocolitis OR Regional Enteritis OR Enteritis Regionalis OR Colon Regional Enteritis OR Regional Colitis OR Granulomatous Enteritis OR Ileocolitis OR Granulomatous Colitis OR Terminal Ileitis OR Regional Ileitides OR Regional Ileitis OR Morbus Crohn Infliximab OR Monoclonal Antibody ca2 OR MAb ca2 OR Remsima OR Remicade OR Avakine OR Inflectra OR Revellex Golimumab OR cnto 148 OR cnto148 OR Simponi Adalimumab OR D2E7 Antibody OR Monoclonal Antibody D2E7 OR LU200134 OR Humira OR Trudexa Vedolizumab OR mln0002 OR mln 0002 OR mln 02 OR mln02 OR Monoclonal Antibody mln 02 OR Monoclonal Antibody ldp 02 OR ldp 02, ldp02 OR Entyvio Certolizumab OR Certolizumab Pegol OR Cimzia OR CDP870 OR CDP 870 OR Pha 738144 OR Pha738144 OR Pegylated Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Antibody Fab Fragment OR Pegylated Tumour necrosis Factor Alpha Antibody Fab Fragment PubMed: humans, Randomized Controlled Trial; Embase: humans, Embase only, Randomized Controlled Trial; Cochrane: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, word variations have been searched Only English publications

Supplementary material Table 2. Summary of the safety profile of biologic drugs Outcome Number of events/number of participants (%) Long-term follow-up ADA ADA GLM GLM VDZ VDZ IFX IFX Biological Placebo Biological Placebo Biological Placebo Biological Placebo Any AEs 713/836 478/564 225/308 103/156 1203/1434 466/576 106/121 103/121 (85) (85) (73) (66) (84) (81) (88) (85) SAEs 112/1013 94/660 35/308 12/156 276/1434 83/576 99/452 119/453 (11) (14) (11) (8) (19) (14) (22) (26) AEs leading to 81/1013 83/660 22/308 (7) 10/156 n/d n/d 46/463 29/466 discontinuation (8) (13) (6) (10) (6) of study drug Injection site 54/496 17/399 46/308 18/156 33/814 (4) 14/301 79/463 55/466 reaction (11) (4) (15) (12) (5) (17) (12) Infections 519/1013 293/660 120/308 44/156 730/1434 276/576 53/121 47/121 (51) (44) (39) (28) (51) (48) (44) (39) Serious infections 15/542 (3) 11/286 (4) n/d n/d 45/814 (6) 9/301 (3) 12/331 (4) 17/332 (5) Infections n/d n/d 83/308 24/156 n/d n/d 150/452 134/453 requiring (27) (15) (33) (30) antimicrobial treatment Abdominal pain 39/517 (8) 17/261 22/308 (7) 4/156 114/1434 49/576 11/121 16/121 (7) (3) (8) (9) (11) (13) Middle-term follow-up IFX IFX CZP CZP Biological Placebo Biological Placebo 116/162 106/164 409/547 403/541 (72) (65) (75) (74) 16/162 28/164 46/547 (8) 37/541 (10) (17) (7) n/d n/d n/d n/d 17/162 12 (164 15/547 (3) 78/541 (10) (7) (14) n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d 10/121 (8) 14/123 37/331 37/329 (11) (11) (11)

Outcome Number of events/number of participants (%) Long-term follow-up Middle-term follow-up ADA Biological ADA Placebo GLM Biological GLM Placebo VDZ Biological VDZ Placebo IFX Biological IFX Placebo IFX Biological IFX Placebo CZP Biological CZP Placebo Arthralgia 61/517 (12) 23/261 (9) 19/308 (6) 12/156 (8) 166/1434 (12) 65/576 (11) 21/121 (17) 18/121 (15) 16/121 (13) 6/123 (5) 22/331 (7) 16/329 (5) Headache 55/517 (11) 15/261 (6) 24/308 (8) 14/156 (9) 177/1434 (12) 75/576 (13) 22/121 (18) 27/121 (22) 19/121 (16) 18/123 (15) 75/547 (14) 68/541 (13) Nausea 41/517 (8) 16/261 (6) n/d n/d 128/1434 (9) 49/576 (9) 14/121 (12) 14/121 (12) 6/121 (5) 9/123 (7) 26/331 (8) 27/329 (8) Cough n/d n/d 14/308 (5) 5/156 36/620 (6) 13/275 n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d (3) (5) Nasopharyngitis 67/554 25/279 35/308 11/156 80/620 26/275 1/11 (9) 2/13 n/d n/d n/d n/d (12) (9) (11) (7) (13) (9) (15) Pyrexia 31/517 (6) 14/261 n/d n/d 103/814 40/301 n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d (5) (13) (13) Pharyngitis n/d n/d 13/308 (4) 4/156 n/d n/d 12/121 10/121 n/d n/d n/d n/d (3) (10) (8) URTI 28/517 (5) 16/261 (6) 17/308 (6) 4/156 (3) 236/1434 (16) 77/576 (13) 20/121 (17) 28/121 (23) n/d n/d n/d n/d The table includes only data for the endpoints for which it was possible to conduct a network meta-analysis; ADA adalimumab; AE adverse event; CZP certolizumab pegol; GLM golimumab; IFX infliximab; n/d no data; SAE serious adverse event; URTI upper respiratory tract infection; VDZ vedolizumab

Supplementary material Table 3. Summary of the safety profile of biologic drugs in the extended phases Biologic drugs Infliximab Adalimumab Certolizumab pegol Extension phase of study ACT-1 and ACT-2 ULTRA CHARM Watanabe et al. 2012 RECISE 1 and RECISE 2 Duration Up to 3 years Up to 4 years Up to 2 years Up to 4 years Up to 148 weeks Up to 7 years Outcome E/100-PY E (E/100-PY)* n/n=854 E (E/100- E (E/100- n/n=79 E (E/100- n/n=595 (%) (N=230) (N=1010) (%) PY)** (N=854) PY)^ (N=854) (%) PY)^^ (N=79) Any AEs 506 8.057 (344.6) 804 (94.1) 7644 (713.0) 9736 (583.1) 7 (100.0) 1154 (743.1) 525 (88.2) SAEs 21 414 (17.7) 219 (25.6) 357 (33.3) 517 (31.0) 49 (62.0) 88 (56.7) 240 (40.3) AEs leading to 4.63 249 (10.7) 174 (20.4) 212 (19.8) 252 (15.1) 28 (35.4) 29 (18. 204 (34.3) discontinuation of study drug 7) AE leading to death 0.20 2 (0.1) n/d n/d 2 (0.1) n/d n/d 4 (0.7) AE related to study drug 4.63 n/d 475 (55.6) 1637 (152.7) 1933 (115.8) 47 (59.5) 127 (81.8) 252 (42.4) Infection 99 n/d 510 (59.7) 1424 (132.8) 1966 (117.7) 68 (86.1) 337 (217.0) n/d Serious infection 3.4 79 (3.4) 56 (6.6) 69 (6.4) 102 (6.1) 9 (11.4) 11 (7.1) n/d Infections requiring 41 n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d antimicrobial treatment Malignancy 1.01 23 (1.0) 11 (1.3) 12 (1.1) 26 (1.6) 0 0 n/d Injection site pain n/d n/d 54 (6.3) 59 (5.5) 125 (7.5) n/d n/d n/d Injection site reaction 7.25 246 (10.5) n/d n/d n/d 6 (7.6) 6 (3.9) n/d Opportunistic infection n/d 6 (0.3) 19 (2.2) 22 (2.1) 22 (1.3) 1 (1.3) 1 (0.6) 114 (19.2) Tuberculosis n/d 1 (<1) 3 (0.4) 3 (0.3) 3 (0.2) 0 0 n/d Congestive heart failure n/d 4 (0.2) 0 0 0 0 0 n/d

Biologic drugs Infliximab Adalimumab Certolizumab pegol Extension phase of study ACT-1 and ACT-2 ULTRA CHARM Watanabe et al. 2012 RECISE 1 and RECISE 2 Duration Up to 3 years Up to 4 years Up to 2 years Up to 4 years Up to 148 weeks Up to 7 years Outcome E/100-PY E (E/100-PY)* n/n=854 E (E/100- E (E/100- n/n=79 E (E/100- n/n=595 (%) (N=230) (N=1010) (%) PY)** (N=854) PY)^ (N=854) (%) PY)^^ (N=79) Demyelinating disorder 0 3 (0.1) 2 (0.2) 3 (0.3) 3 (0.2) 0 0 n/d Hepatic event n/d 12 (0.5) n/d n/d 53 (3.2) 21 (26.6) 36 (23.2) n/d Allergic reaction n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d 1 (1.3) 1 (0.6) n/d Lupus-like syndrome n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d 0 0 n/d Blood disorder n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d 2 (2.5) 2 (1.3) n/d Lymphoma n/d 3 (0.1) n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d n/d AE adverse event; E events; E/100-PY events/100 patient-years; PY patient-year.*py=2338.0; **PY=1072.1; ^PY=1669.7; ^^PY=155.3

Supplementary material Figure 1. Forest plot for results from pair-wise meta-analyses (blank squares) and from network meta-analysis (solid squares) for outcomes: A) any adverse events (AEs); B) serious AEs; C) AEs leading to discontinuation of study drug; D) injection site reaction; E) infections; F) serious infections; G) infections requiring antimicrobial treatment long-term follow-up. Squares represent pooled estimates of OR. Lines for 95% confidence intervals (CIs) represent 95% CIs in pair-wise meta-analyses and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) in network meta-analysis. The result of a single study was provided as OR with 95% CI.

Supplementary material Figure 2. Forest plot for results from pair-wise meta-analyses (blank squares) and from network meta-analysis (solid squares) for outcomes: A) abdominal pain; B) arthralgia; C) cough; D) headache; E) nausea; F) nasopharyngitis; G) pharyngitis; H) pyrexia; I) upper respiratory tract infection long-term follow-up. Squares represent pooled estimates of OR. Lines for 95% confidence intervals (CIs) represent 95% CIs in pair-wise meta-analyses and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) in network meta-analysis. The result of a single study was provided as OR with 95% CI.

Supplementary material Figure 3. Forest plot for results from pair-wise meta-analyses (blank squares) and from network meta-analysis (solid squares) for outcomes: A) any adverse events; B) serious adverse events; C) injection site reaction; D) abdominal pain; E) arthralgia; F) headache; G) nausea middle-term followup. Squares represent pooled estimates of OR. Lines for 95% confidence intervals (CIs) represent 95% CIs in pair-wise meta-analyses and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) in network meta-analysis. The result of a single study was provided as OR with 95% CI.

Any AE 8 6 4 Rank 1 CZP Rank 2 IFX Rank 3 PLC Injection site reaction 10 8 6 4 CZP IFX PLC Arthralgia 8 6 4 SAEs 10 8 6 4 Abdominal pain 8 6 4 Headache 6 4 CZP IFX PLC CZP IFX PLC CZP IFX PLC CZP IFX PLC Nausea 8 6 4 CZP IFX PLC Supplementary material Figure 4. Ranking of treatment strategies based on the probability of their protective effects on analyzed outcomes middle-term follow-up

Any AE 6 4 Rank 4 Rank 5 AEs leading to discontinuation of study drug 8 6 4 Rank 4 ADA GLM IFX PLC Infections 8 6 4 SAEs 8 6 4 Rank 4 Rank 5 Injection site reaction 6 4 Rank 4 Rank 5 Serious infections 8 6 4 Rank 4 Rank 5 Infections requiring antimicrobial treatment 10 8 6 4 GLM IFX PLC Rank 4 ADA IFX PLC VDZ Supplementary material Figure 5. Ranking of treatment strategies based on the probability of their protective effects on analyzed outcomes long-term follow-up

Abdominal pain 8 6 4 Rank 4 Rank 5 Headache 8 Arthralgia 6 4 Rank 4 Rank 5 Cough 6 6 4 Rank 4 Rank 5 Pyrexia 6 4 4 Nausea 8 6 4 GLM PLC VDZ ADA PLC VDZ Pharyngitis 8 6 4 GLM IFX PLC Upper respiratory tract infection 8 Rank 4 ADA IFX PLC VDZ Nasopharyngitis 6 4 Rank 4 Rank 5 6 4 Rank 4 Rank 5 Supplementary material Figure 6. Ranking of treatment strategies based on the probability of their protective effects on analyzed outcomes (individual adverse events) long-term follow-up