VERSYS HERITAGE REVISION HIP PROSTHESIS. Surgical Technique for Revision Hip Arthroplasty

Similar documents
Following a tradition of success. VerSys Heritage Primary Hip Prosthesis Surgical Technique

VerSys LD/Fx Cemented and Press-Fit Hip Prostheses. Surgical Technique IMAGE TO COME. Versatile solutions for total and partial hip replacement

Versys Advocate V-Lign and Non V-Lign Cemented Hip Prosthesis

Encina Taper Stem. Stinson Orthopedics Inc. 303 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 600 Redwood City, CA

Clinical Evaluation Surgical Technique

EXTENDED TROCHANTERIC OSTEOTOMY SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FPO EXTENSIVELY COATED FIXATION

Bone Preservation Stem

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE. Alpine Cementless Hip Stem

AML Hip System. Design Rationale/ Surgical Technique

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE. Alpine Cemented Hip Stem

Approach Patients with Confidence

CAUTION: Ceramic liners are not approved for use in the United States.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE CEMENTED & PRESS-FIT UNIFIED INSTRUMENTATION INTRAOPERATIVE FLEXIBILITY PROVEN BIOMECHANICS

Cementless Tapered Femoral Stem Surgical technique

VerSys Fiber Metal Taper Hip Prosthesis. Surgical Technique

Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis. Surgical Technique

Cementless Tapered Femoral Stem Surgical technique

28 Surgical Technique

Optimum implant geometry

Revision. Hip Stem. Surgical Protocol

ZMR Porous Revision Hip Prosthesis. Surgical Technique IMAGE TO COME

Approach Patients with Confidence

ZMR Over-the-Junction Instruments for Revision Hip Arthroplasty. Surgical Technique IMAGE TO COME

ADDRESSING CLINICAL ISSUES OF CEMENTLESS HIP ARTHROPLASTY

APS Natural-Hip System

Surgical Technique. Hip System

Preoperative Planning. The primary objectives of preoperative planning are to:

Zimmer NexGen MIS Tibial Component. Cemented Surgical Technique IMAGE TO COME

FLH /11

VerSys 6 Beaded FullCoat Plus Hip Prosthesis

Stinson Orthopedics Inc. 303 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 600 Redwood City, CA

HIP SYSTEM SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Arcos Modular Femoral Revision System. Broach and Calcar Proximal Bodies Surgical Technique

Taperloc Complete Hip System. Surgical Technique

ACETABULAR CUP SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

THE NATURAL FIT. Surgical Technique. Hip Knee Spine Navigation

HELIOS h i p s y s t e m

9800 Metric Blvd. Austin, Texas

TaperFill. Surgical Technique

Absolut TM Cemented Stem. Surgical Technique

Design Rationale. ECHELON Primary Hip System

Zimmer Segmental System. Surgical Technique for Proximal Femoral Replacement and Intercalary Segments IMAGE TO COME

Zimmer Trabecular Metal Ankle Interpositional Spacer and Trabecular Metal Ankle Fusion Spacer

OSS Orthopedic Salvage System Compress Device. Surgical Technique

PLR. Proximal Loading Revision Hip System

TaperFit. Cemented Total Hip Replacement Surgical technique

21st Century Fracture Management ETS. Surgical Protocol

Tradition Hip Primary Surgical Technique

Ovation Hip System. Surgical Technique

Aesculap Trilliance Triple Tapered Polished Hip Stem

Anterior Approach Surgical Technique. Paragon Stem System. enabling people to enjoy life

operative technique Kent Hip

Bi-Polar 22.2mm & 28mm System - Operative technique

Manza Cup HA SURGICAL TECHNIQUE.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE GUIDE

Arcos Interlocking Distal Stem. Surgical Technique Addendum to the Arcos Modular Femoral Revision System

MIS Cemented Tibial Component

Continuing the Tradition. VerSys Heritage Hip System

U2 PSA. Revision Knee. Surgical Protocol

DePuy LPS Limb Preservation System

Natural-Hip System. Surgical Technique. Addressing surgical concerns comprehensively

AVANTEON. Operative Technique & Catalogue Information AVANTEON

A novel cementless option. Zimmer NexGen Trabecular Metal Primary Patella Surgical Technique

Integral 180 Surgical Technique

Longevity Offset and Oblique Liners. Surgical Technique

S U R G I C A L T E C H N I Q U E David A. McQueen, MD Return to Menu

Progeny Hip Stem. Surgical Protocol and Product Specifications

THE P.F.C. SIGMA FEMORAL ADAPTER. Surgical Technique

Optimum implant geometry

Distal Cut First Femoral Preparation

PRIMARY POROUS PATELLA WITH TRABECULAR METAL. Surgical Technique

TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY SYSTEM

Zimmer NexGen Trabecular Metal Tibial Tray

Trabecular Metal Primary Patella

EMPERION Modular Hip System Surgical Technique

NEXGEN COMPLETE KNEE SOLUTION S A. Tibial Stem Extension & Augmentation Surgical. ATechnique

LPS SYSTEM POCKET GUIDE

Ease of Use. Have the instrument you need when you need it.

OPTIONAL/ADDITIONAL INSTRUMENTS

Scan Bi-Polar 22/28. Operative Technique

Wichita Fusion Nail Surgical Technique. David A. McQueen, MD

CPT 6 Stainless Steel Primary Hip System

Zimmer NexGen Tibial Stem Extension & Augmentation. Surgical Technique IMAGE TO COME. Stem Extensions and Augments

S U R G I C A L T E C H N I Q U E

Metha Short Hip Stem System

Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis with Kinectiv Technology. Surgical Technique

ZMR Crossover Instruments. Abbreviated Surgical Technique

LPS SYSTEM SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

UNDERSTANDING TRADITION, MASTERING INNOVATION. Surgical Technique

Trilogy Acetabular System

Trilogy Acetabular System

Optimum implant geometry

ZMR CROSSOVER INSTRUMENTS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE. Surgical Technique for Revision Hip Arthroplasty

Pre-Operative Planning. Positioning of the Patient

Zimmer ITST Intertrochanteric/ Subtrochanteric Fixation System. Abbreviated Surgical Technique

3. PATIENT POSITIONING & FRACTURE REDUCTION 3 8. DISTAL GUIDED LOCKING FOR PROXIMAL NAIL PROXIMAL LOCKING FOR LONG NAIL 13

Surgical Technique. Cup System

RESTORATION MODULAR. Surgical Protocol REVISION HIP SYSTEM

RECOVERY. P r o t r u s i o

asterloc Surgical Technique HIP SYSTEM UNDERSTANDING TRADITION, MASTERING INNOVATION Hip Knee Spine Navigation

Transcription:

VERSYS HERITAGE REVISION HIP PROSTHESIS Surgical Technique for Revision Hip Arthroplasty

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FOR VERSYS HERITAGE REVISION HIP PROSTHESIS CONTENTS DESIGN PHILOSOPHY................ 2 PREOPERATIVE PLANNING............ 2 SURGICAL TECHNIQUE............... 3 Incision and Exposure............. 3 Determination of Leg Length........ 4 Stem Removal................... 4 By: Dennis K. Collis, M.D. Eugene, OR Professor José Couceiro, M.D. Santiago de Compostela, Spain Richard C. Johnston, M.D. Des Moines, IA Eduardo A. Salvati, M.D. New York, NY Preparation of the Femoral Canal.... 6 Femoral Rasping................. 6 Distal Reaming (Optional).......... 7 Inserting Provisional Stems......... 8 Trial Reduction................... 9 Canal Preparation................ 10 Preparation for the Proximal Centralization Sleeve (Optional).... 10 Cement Introduction and Stem Insertion.................. 11 Please refer to the package insert for complete product information, including contraindications, warnings, and precautionary information. 1

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY The VerSys Heritage Revision Hip System includes a number of stems that are larger and longer than those typically used for primary arthroplasty. This allows the system to meet the need for a cemented stem revision implant for Type I and Type II femoral deficiencies and, in some cases, Type III deficiencies. The revision system is designed to work with the VerSys Hip System Rasps to achieve optimal placement and fixation. The VerSys Hip System Rasps allow preparation of a bony bed into which the prosthesis can be inserted with an adequate cement mantle. The distal stem tip geometry helps reduce the strains in the cement mantle around the distal tip. The addition of an external distal centralizer helps centralize the implant distally. The prosthesis also incorporates an increased neck length and offset to help restore proper joint kinematics in revision cases. PREOPERATIVE PLANNING The key to successful revision THA is comprehensive planning to prepare for a variety of potential circumstances. The overall objective of preoperative planning is to enable the surgeon to determine anatomic parameters that allow accurate intraoperative placement of the femoral implant. Specifically, the objectives of preoperative planning include: 1. Determination of leg length, 2. Establishment of appropriate abductor muscle tension and femoral offset, 3. Determination of anticipated component sizing and placement, 4. Determination of lateralization into the trochanteric bed to achieve neutral alignment of the implant, and 5. Determination of potential difficulties in implant removal and insertion. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE Incision and Exposure The incision for revision surgery requires careful planning to minimize the possibility of wound healing complications. Begin by outlining the anatomic landmarks on the skin, including the greater trochanter, femur, iliac crest, anterosuperior iliac spine, and the interval between the tensor fascia lata and the gluteus maximus. Then mark the existing scars. Avoid crossing previous scars at an angle less than 60 degrees, and avoid distal-based skin flaps, both of which can lead to skin necrosis. Whenever possible, use a previous incision that can be extended proximally or distally. It is helpful to begin the incision distally in virgin tissue where the fascia lata does not adhere to the vastus lateralis. The most common exposures for revision THA are (1) the posterolateral approach without a trochanteric osteotomy, (2) the true lateral approach with a standard trochanteric osteotomy, (3) the extended direct lateral approach or, (4) the extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO). For complex acetabular reconstructions, trochanteric osteotomy provides the best exposure of the supra-acetabular ilium. The extended trochanteric osteotomy is particularly useful for extraction of well-fixed stems and cement. Alternatively, the posterolateral approach can provide excellent extensile exposure and mobilization of the upper femur for cement removal and bone grafting. This frequently entails partial or complete release of the gluteus maximus tendon, short external rotators, iliopsoas tendon and complete capsulotomy. 2 3

Determination of Leg Length After exposing the joint, establish landmarks and obtain measurements before dislocating the hip. This will allow a comparison of leg length and femoral offset after reconstruction to achieve the goals established during preoperative planning. There are several methods to measure leg length. One method is to place one pin in the iliac wing and another pin parallel to the first pin in the greater trochanter. Then measure the distance between them. Perform this measurement with the leg in the neutral position; a position that can be reproduced after the new implant has been inserted. Stem Removal Remove the previous implant from the femoral canal. The ease with which a femoral component can be removed will vary, depending on the following circumstances: 1. Whether the stem is loose or well fixed, 2. Whether the stem is cemented or cementless, and 3. Whether the stem length is regular or long. Each situation has inherent problems that should be anticipated. Loose, Cemented Femoral Components Standard Length Excise all scar tissue and membrane around the femoral neck to completely expose the implant and cement mantle. If the stem has a collar and has subsided, new bone may have grown over the collar. Remove this bone and the wedge-shaped proximal/ lateral cement mass before attempting to extract the stem. If the cement is not removed, it will serve as a reverse wedge and, as the stem is backed out, it may fracture the lateral cortex of the femur at the greater trochanter. The stem removal method will depend on the following factors: 1. Whether the failure occurred at the cement/metal interface or the cement/bone interface, 2. Whether the femoral head is modular or monoblock, 3. Whether there is an extraction hole, and 4. Whether the stem has a collar or flange. If the failure has occurred at the cement/ metal interface, stem removal is usually easy and can often be done manually or with an extraction hook and slaphammer. If the stem has failed at the cement/bone interface, removal may be difficult because of tenacious membrane that forms between the cement and bone. The difficulty arises primarily when the cement/metal interface does not disrupt as the femoral component is being extracted, and removal of the stem brings with it all of the adherent cement. If areas of osteolysis or angular deformity create a situation in which the distal cement attached to the stem is wider than the medullary canal at any point, there is a possibility of fracturing the femur as the implant with cement is extracted. In this case, it is safer to disrupt the cement/metal interface and remove the stem first. This may be especially difficult if the stem surface has a rough finish. After stem removal, remove the cement in small sections. If the stem has an extraction hole, use a hook and slaphammer to remove the stem. Exercise patience and great care to avoid damaging the femur during the extraction. The use of a carbide-tip punch can be helpful, as well as the use of the Antonson U-shaped extractor for collared or monoblock stems. Loose, Cemented Femoral Components Long Stem Careful analysis of the A/P and lateral radiographs is important to predict potential difficulty in removing this stem, particularly if it is curved. If segments of the current mantle, which are well fixed to the stem, are also adherent to osteolytic bone, there is a serious risk of fracturing the femur during stem extraction. It is safer to make a window in the femur and remove the cement prior to extracting the stem. Beware of a long stem cemented femoral component with a mid-stem taper. Removal of this component is particularly difficult and the extended trochanteric osteotomy can help significantly. Loose, Cementless Femoral Components (porous and textured surfaces) Standard and Long Stem Removal of these implants can either be straightforward, or deceptive and challenging. In some cases, the femoral component may be loose, yet difficult to remove because of substantial fibrous tissue ingrowth. To disrupt this interface, use long flexible osteotomes, working circumferentially around the proximal portion of the implant. It may be necessary to osteotomize the trochanter for access to the lateral aspect of the stem. It may even be necessary to remove the prosthetic collar with a metal-cutting tool to allow access to the proximal medial interface. Alternatively, if this problem is anticipated, an extended trochanteric osteotomy down to the level of the distal end of the porous coating can provide excellent access to this interface. This is particularly useful for fully porous coated or textured stems. Expose the lateral femur by first elevating the vastus lateralis. Then mark the osteotomy to mobilize the lateral third of the femur to the length of the failed stem, if it is fully coated. Make a series of 1mm diameter drill holes, 5mm apart, along the planned osteotomy. Then complete the osteotomy with a sharp osteotome or microsagittal saw. Use extreme care when lifting the bone off the underlying porous surface. Disruption of the medial interface can then be accomplished with a Gigli saw. 4 5

Preparation of the Femoral Canal After removing the implant, inspect the metaphyseal and diaphyseal regions for a neocortex, sclerotic bone formation and, in the case of a cemented implant, remaining bone cement. Use this information to choose the appropriate procedure for femoral preparation. Both femoral rasps and implant provisionals are available to guide the preparation of the femoral canal. A traditional rasping technique can be used to remove bone in the same manner as in primary surgery. In some cases with extensive endosteal osteolysis or enlargement, it may not be practical to use rasps. Instead, stem provisionals are used to choose the appropriate size and length of implant. The surgeon can decide intraoperatively which technique is most appropriate for the specific patient. Femoral Rasping Use the VerSys Hip System Rasps when preparing the canal for a VerSys Heritage Revision Prosthesis. Sometimes the primary rasps and prosthesis are the appropriate choice. Do not use the LM (Large Metaphyseal) or ET (Enhanced Taper) Rasps. These rasps are engraved with an LM or ET near the trunnion for easy identification. Also, there is no need to use the Rasp Alignment Tip for the Cemented VerSys Heritage Revision Implants (Fig. 1). The threads on the tip can be left uncovered when rasping the canal. Antevert the femoral rasp by approximately 15 degrees when driving it into the medullary canal. Start with a rasp one or two sizes smaller than the implant size selected during templating (Fig. 2). The rasp should advance with each moderate tap of the mallet. Rasp the femoral canal with sequentially incremental rasps until the cortical envelope is filled (Fig. 3). Distal Reaming (Optional) In some cases, distal reaming may be helpful in preparing the canal to accept the selected implant. Remember that all sizes of the VerSys Heritage Revision Implant extend beyond the rasp envelope. Use straight reamers (Fig. 4) when enlarging the diaphysis. Chart A shows the distal dimensions for the three body sizes. The amount of reaming will cortex. If the provisional does not pass freely, it may be necessary to ream the distal canal with a flexible reamer by an additional 1-2mm to allow insertion of the stem, or a smaller implant should be used. Chart A Implant Distal Reamer Diameter Size *Dimension* for 1.5mm Cement Mantle 13 11 14 15 13 16 17 15 18 Dimension measured just above the distal tip. * depend on the length of implant chosen and the amount of femoral bowing. In all cases, and especially those with excessive femoral bowing, insert the provisionals to make sure the implant passes freely. Care should be used when advancing the provisional in the canal to avoid perforation of the femoral Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 6 7

Inserting Provisional Stems Select the provisional stem based on rasp size or preoperative planning. Use the VerSys IM Sizers to determine the size of the Provisional Distal Centralizer that will pass freely into the canal (Fig. 5). If the IM Sizer is tight in the canal, choose a Provisional Distal Centralizer one size smaller than the size of the IM Sizer. Attach the Provisional Distal Centralizer to the Stem Provisional Provisional Distal Centralizers are available in 1mm increments, from 10mm to 19mm. Be aware that although Distal Centralizers are less effective when used below the isthmus, they still prevent the tip from contacting endosteal cortex. In addition, the function of the Provisional Distal Centralizers is to help stabilize the distal tip of the implant during the trial reduction of the hip. Important: Insert the Stem Provisional assembly into the femoral canal (Fig. 7) to verify that the final implants will fit the femoral anatomy. Trial Reduction Lap pads or Ratex sponges can be used around the provisional to provide stability in the canal. Mark the version on the medial neck with methylene blue. Press the Femoral Head Provisional firmly onto the taper of the Stem Provisional. Adjust the provisional to match the rasp anteversion (Fig. 8). The neck of the Stem Provisional has a C-ring along the taper that holds the (Fig. 6). Turn the Provisional Distal Femoral Head Provisional onto the Stem Centralizer clockwise on the threads of the Provisional. Stem Provisional until it will no longer turn. Then make a visual check to ensure that it is completely on. Reduce the hip and choose the appropriate neck length. Carefully evaluate stability and leg length, and ensure that there is good stability and no impingement. If the soft tissue tension is inadequate, choose a longer neck length. Remove the provisional component from the femoral canal. Fig. 5 Fig. 6 Fig. 7 Fig. 8 8 9

Canal Preparation Preparation for the Proximal Prepare the canal with pulsatile lavage Centralization Sleeve (Optional) irrigation and dry it thoroughly. Place a The Proximal Centralization Sleeve slides distal cement restrictor at a depth to allow onto the medial proximal aspect of the 1.5-2cm of cement below the tip of the stem body just below the osteotomy level, prosthesis. If the tip is below the isthmus, abutting against the minimized collar you may want to use a separate, small (Fig. 10). When fully engaged, the Proximal mixing of cement to secure the plastic Centralization Sleeve will lock into the restrictor in place. Next, cover or occlude anterior and posterior dimples on the any perforations or windows in the femoral implant. Attach it at the same time the canal. If a Distal Centralizer is to be used, Distal Centralizer is positioned, placing select a Distal Centralizer that matches the doughy cement on the proximal aspect of size of the Provisional Distal Centralizer the stem. The main body of the stem should used with the provisional implant. be protected from the surgical team s gloved The inner diameter of the Distal Centralizer hands while the centralizers are attached. has a slight taper through its length. Before attaching the Distal Centralizer to the stem, apply a thin layer of cement to the distal tip or fill the hole of the centralizer with cement. This will provide a good bond between the stem and Distal Centralizer. When attaching the centralizer, introduce the tip of the stem through the opening on the flat side of the centralizer (Fig. 9). Advance the centralizer on the stem tip with a minimum force until it comes to rest in its final position. The centralizer does not need to be twisted or forced onto the stem. Fig. 10 Fig. 9 It is recommended that the original plastic cover on the stem be kept on the body of the stem while the proximal and distal centralizers are applied, and until just before insertion so that the polished stem surface remains untouched until placed into the cement bed in the canal (Fig. 11). Fig. 11 Cement Introduction and Stem Insertion Clean and dry the previously plugged femoral canal. This is especially important when doing a cemented revision. When the cement has attained a doughy consistency, inject the cement into the canal with a syringe in retrograde fashion and firmly compress it (Fig. 12). Fig. 12 10 11

Check to ensure that the 12/14 neck taper is clean and dry. Place the femoral head on the taper with a twisting motion until it locks onto the taper. Then impact it with one firm strike of the mallet, using the Head Impactor. Check the security of the head by trying to remove it by hand. During stem insertion, the stem axis should be parallel to the longitudinal axis of the femur. No extraction hole is necessary because the VerSys Heritage Hip Prosthesis is a polished stem, which can be disimpacted from its surrounding cement mantle by removing the cement from the proximal lateral portion of the stem and striking the minimized collar in a retrograde fashion. Insert the stem with the insertion device to within 1cm of the neck cut (Fig. 13). Then remove excess cement to provide a clear view of the final seating. Continue seating the implant until the minimized collar reaches the position marked during the trial reduction (Fig. 14). Note: Impacting the Stem Driver while inserting the implant with the femoral head attached may cause the head to loosen. Test the security of the head fixation by trying to remove the head by hand once the implant is seated. One sharp blow using the Head Impactor and a mallet should be used to ensure that the femoral head is seated on the taper. After insertion, hold the prosthesis by the neck, or use the Head Impactor to hold the prosthesis in place. This prevents the inadvertent application of torsional forces on the prosthesis while the cement is hardening. The minimized collar often rests on part of the posterior medial cortex of the cut neck, but this is not intended to be load bearing through collar/calcar contact. It is very important to pay attention to the cement/ prosthesis composite until the cement has completely hardened. After the cement has completely hardened, reduce the hip. Then check range of motion, stability, leg length, and soft tissue tension. Finally, close the wound layers appropriately. Fig. 13 Fig. 14 12

VERSYS HERITAGE REVISION HIP PROSTHESIS C B A B C Average VerSys A Offset (mm) Neck Length (mm) Cement Heritage Stem When Head/Neck When Head/Neck Mantle Revision Stem Length Component Selected is: Component Selected is: Thickness Prod. No. Size (mm) -3.5 0 +3.5 +7 +10.5-3.5 0 +3.5 +77 +10.5 (mm) 7857-33-14 13 140 43 45 47 49 51 44 47 50 54 57 1.75 7857-35-16 15 160 46 48 50 52 54 49 52 55 59 62 2.0 7857-35-22 15 220 46 48 50 52 54 49 52 55 59 62 2.0 7857-37-18 17 180 47 49 51 53 55 52 55 58 62 65 2.0 All sizes may not be available. Contact your Zimmer representative for additional information. 97-7857-03 10MZ Printed in USA 2001 Zimmer, Inc.