Negligent Injection Medical Malpractice Negligent Treatment Medical Malpractice Informed Consent

Similar documents
CHERYL McGAULEY, as Personal Representative of the Estate of WALTER L. McGAULEY, SR.,

Recent Verdict Against Personal Trainer Lessons to be Learned

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GENERAL JURISDICTION AND COMMON FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

PHILIP R. KIMBALL, as Administrator of the Estate of CARLA M. KIMBALL, Deceased, Plaintiff, vs. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant.

5.71 TAVERN KEEPERS SERVING MINORS AND INTOXICATED PERSONS (3/10) NOTE TO JUDGE

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

General Information: (Circle One) (Circle One) Primary Insured's Information Skip if you are primary

Our office is always open, online at

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY CORRECTION, EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G DAVID YERXA, Employee. NCR CORPORATION, Employer

Health Professions Review Board

AUGUST 2007 LAW REVIEW LEAD PAINT PLAYGROUND HAZARD EVIDENCE

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/21/ :29 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/21/2016

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G JANNIE A. HYMES, EMPLOYEE PINEWOOD HEALTH & REHABILITATION, EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F702969

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE, INSURANCE CARRIER

Velez v Wys 2017 NY Slip Op 30766(U) March 29, 2017 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Howard H. Sherman Cases posted with

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY McCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION II CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-CI-00159

A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

If you sought health insurance coverage or benefits from MAGNETIC STIMULATION ( TMS )

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G BEVERLY JOHNSON, EMPLOYEE CARLTON BATES COMPANY, EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM F ROBERT LEON PAVEL, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT

A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL

A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F MARTHA J. WIGGINS, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED DECEMBER 4, 2012

v. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN June 7, 1996 ANN B. SOWERS, M.D., ET AL.

NO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL FOR SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR EVALUATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DEFAMATION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F & F CAROLYN SANCHEZ, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED MARCH 30, 2010

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED OCTOBER 26, 2005

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2307/06

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F HOME DEPOT, INC. RESPONDENT NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F TYNET CORPORATION, INC. CARRIER OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 10, 2010

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 H 1 HOUSE BILL 933. Short Title: Informed Consent for HIV/AIDS Testing. (Public)

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ROSA CORTEZ CLAIMANT BRIGHTON HOUSE CARE CENTER OPINION FILED MAY 28, 2004

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F WESTPORT INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER OPINION FILED JANUARY 19, 2005

Quiles v Rojas 2015 NY Slip Op 31664(U) January 5, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /11 Judge: Howard H. Sherman Cases posted

A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL

Steven Ianuzzi v. Comm Social Security

PROPOSED CHANGES TO COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT SMOKING IN OUTDOOR DINING AREAS

A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL

COMPLAINT FOR MEDICAL Huegli Fraser PC 101 SW

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS. FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner October 10, 2017 MEMORANDUM DECISION

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTEN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

No. 52,000-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED FEBRUARY 20, 2004

No. 49,522-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G TRACYE JOHNSON, EMPLOYEE DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., EMPLOYER

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed October 14, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clayton County, Richard D.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NUMBER F BRYCE CORPORATION, EMPLOYER OPINION FILED SEPTEMBER 13, 2004

Innovative Coalition Strategies to Evite, Engage & Empower the Community. Behavioral Health Services/NCADD Torrance, California

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ALISHA MILLER CLAIMANT SOUTH ARK YOUTH SERVICES, INC.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED JULY 21, 2006

Return Date: February 27, 2002

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM F & F WILLIE LEE EVERETT, JR., EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT

Release of Liability. Participant Signature: Participant Name (please print): Signature of Witness:

JUDGMENT. STATE OF MAINE Penobscot, 55. SUPERIOR COURT Docket No. CV /tJ\llM -PttJ~ 1/:;.e:..,i"JOJ'i! ERVIN DUMOND,

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is an infection within. Assessment of malpractice claims due to spinal epidural abscess

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

Submitted February 14, 2018 Decided. Before Judges Alvarez and Geiger.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Trial Court No. CI Appellant Decided: August 8, 2008 * * * * *

PREPARATION OF THE DEFENDANT FOR DEPOSITION. Danielle Mikalajunas Fogel, Esq. Sugarman Law Firm, LLP

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1820/13

New York Law Journal. Friday, May 9, Trial Advocacy, Cross-Examination of Medical Doctors: Recurrent Themes

TRENDS AND ISSUES REGARDING TALC LITIGATION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ORDER AND OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 30, 2006

A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL

Hospital Liability for Suicide: A Regional Survey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRPORT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RULES OF PROCEDURE

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED MAY 2, 2008

e Magnus Advantage Imagine... Imagine a case where you know the impact of human dynamics, in addition to the law and the issues...

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED OCTOBER 14, 2003

INFORMED CONSENT FOR HYDRATION THERAPY SERVICES AND ARBITRATION AGREEMENT

Guide to Selecting Legal Representation for Brain Injury Cases

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F DEBBIE BEATTY KNAPP, Employee. LOWELL HOME HEALTH, Employer

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY. ************************************* James Harrell, et al., * Lead Case No.: 24X Plaintiffs, *

THE FLORIDA SENATE SPECIAL MASTER ON CLAIM BILLS

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F JAMES SKINKIS, Employee. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Inter-Departmental Correspondence Health System

Analysis of Neurosurgery Risks

Judicial conflict between Bristol-Myers Squibb Co V. Merck & Co Inc. Keytruda V. Opdivo

RUSSELL L. BENTLEY, APPELLANT, v. EDWARD J. DERWINSKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE

II. The Federal Government s Current Approach to Compensation. The issue of compensation for vaccine related injuries has been brought to

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR DUBUQUE COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

City of Carson 701 E. Carson St., Carson, CA Telephone: (310) ; ci.carson.ca.us

BIOGRAPHY. Treating Physician Specialist (Physical Medicine & Rehab) Florida & New York

Transcription:

CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY MEDICAL MALPRACTICE Negligent Injection Medical Malpractice Negligent Treatment Medical Malpractice Informed Consent Negligent injection caused paralysis, patient claimed Mixed Verdict $7,978,185 Case Michael Markow and Francie Markow v. Howard L. Rosner M.D., Nirmala Thejomurthy M.D., Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, The Pain Center, and Does 1 through 100, No. BC476993 Court Judge Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles Elizabeth R. Feffer Date 5/5/2014 Plaintiff Attorney(s) Arnie E. Goldstein, Goldstein, Gurbuz & Robertson, Encino, CA (Michael Markow) Howard A. Kapp, Law Offices of Howard A. Kapp, Los Angeles, CA (Francine Markow) Joy Robertson, Goldstein, Gurbuz & Robertson, Encino, CA (Michael Markow) Defense Attorney(s) Raymond R. Moore, Moore McLennan, LLP, Glendale, CA (Howard Rosner M.D., Nirmala Thejomurthy M.D.) Robert C. Reback, Reback, McAndrews, Kjar, Warford, Stockalper & Moore LLP, Manhattan Beach, CA (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, The Pain Center) Facts & Allegations

On Nov. 11, 2010, plaintiff Michael Markow, 64, a retiree, presented to The Pain Center at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles for pain management with Dr. Howard Rosner, an anesthesiologist/pain management specialist. Markow had been treating with Rosner since 2006 due to severe neck pain. On the date in question, Rosner administered a total of four bilateral facet joint and selective nerve block injections at the C1-2 level. Rosner was accompanied by Dr. Nirmala Thejomurthy, who was serving as the procedural anesthesiologist at the time of the injections. Markow claimed that upon awaking from the procedure, he experienced horrific facial pain, for which he was prescribed pain medication. He alleged he remained bedridden for the next few days, with increasing pain in his neck and throat, and then saw five physicians, including Rosner, regarding his symptoms. On Nov. 20, 2010, Markow was taken to the emergency room at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center with developing neurological conditions. He was ultimately diagnosed with quadriplegia, secondary to a cervical spine infarction at the C2 level. Markow sued Rosner, Thejomurthy and the operator of The Pain Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Markow alleged that the defendants failed to obtain his informed consent, and were negligent in his treatment and injections, causing the cervical spine infarction that progressed to quadriplegia. He further alleged that the defendants' actions constituted medical malpractice. Markow's counsel contended that Rosner failed to obtain Markow's informed consent to perform the dangerous, high-risk injections. Counsel also contended that Rosner injected Markow with Omnipaque -- an iodine-based contrast material -- despite Markow's well-documented allergy to the substance. Counsel further contended that Rosner's pre-procedure orders and the postprocedure billing indicated that Rosner requested, and Cedars-Sinai billed for, Omnipaque. Alternatively, Markow's counsel argued that Rosner misplaced a needle during the procedure, causing a vasospasm to develop over the next nine days and ultimately manifesting into Markow's deteriorating neurological condition. Markow's counsel contended that Thejomurthy and the nursing staff had had a duty to stop the administration of Omnipaque and that they should have prevented the injections during the preprocedure "timeout." Thus, counsel argued that both doctors' negligent treatment did not meet the standard of care. Defense counsel argued that the injections were performed appropriately, that the procedure was within the standard of care, and that Omnipaque was not used in any of the injections. Rosner testified that he instead used Gadolinium, a non-iodine-based contrast, which was dictated in his procedure note. Thus, defense counsel contended that had Markow's reaction to the injections been allergy/trauma based, it would have been both immediate and catastrophic.

Defense counsel argued that Markow's quadriplegia was totally unrelated to the subject procedure/injections. They contended that Markow suffered an evolving cervical spine infarction at some point after the procedure, as Markow had multiple risk factors for a stroke, including experiencing at least one prior stroke. Cedars-Sinai claimed that both Rosner and Thejomurthy were independent contractors, immunizing the entity from any liability based on agency. It also claimed that Markow signed over 20 documents in which he acknowledged that the doctors were not agents or employee of the medical center. In response, Markow's counsel argued that an ostensible agency existed between Cedars-Sinai and Rosner, and held that they were jointly and severally liable. Markow's counsel also presented evidence in dispute of the medical center's claim that Rosner was an independent contractor in that the hospital's Web site listed Rosner as the "Medical Director of the Pain Center at Cedars- Sinai Medical Center." Injuries/Damages loss of consortium; infarction; cervical disc injury; neuralgia; nerve damage, trigeminal nerve; swelling; quadriplegia; catheterization; vasospasm Markow suffered a cervical spine infarction at the C2 level, which ultimately rendered him an incomplete C2 quadriplegic with some limited movement in his lower, right arm. He is now confined to a wheelchair and requires 24-hour care, of which he currently receives daytime care from a caregiver and full-time care from his wife, Francine Markow. Mr. Markow claimed that despite his pre-existing neck condition, he was a very active person before the subject procedure, as he enjoyed working out and engaging in other physical activity. Mrs. Markow claimed her life is now drastically changed, as she devotes almost all of her time caring for her husband. Thus, Mr. Markow sought recovery of $176,201.29 in past economic damages, $1.5 million for future hospitalizations, and $3.9 million for other future medical expenses/life care plan. He also sought recovery of $2 million in damages for his past pain and suffering, and $1 million in damages for his future pain and suffering. In addition, Mrs. Markow sought recovery of $1.5 million in damages for her loss of consortium. Defense counsel argued that Mr. Markow's quadriplegia was totally unrelated to the subject procedure/injections and that the cervical spine infarction occurred at some point after the procedure, as Mr. Markow was at risk for a stroke. Counsel also argued that the plaintiffs' life care planner grossly overstated Mr. Markow's future medical costs. Defense counsel ultimately did not present testimony from their expert physiatrist, life care planner, or economist.

Result The jury found that Thejomurthy was not negligent and rendered a defense verdict in regards to the claims against Thejomurthy. It also found that Cedars-Sinai was negligent, but that its negligence was not a substantial factor in causing the plaintiffs' injuries and damages. However, the jury found that Rosner was negligent and it unanimously found that Rosner was an agent of Cedars-Sinai. Thus, the jury determined that Rosner was 60 percent at fault and that Cedars-Sinai was 40 percent at fault. It also determined that the Markows' damages totaled $7,978,185.44. Plaintiff(s) Francine Markow Michael Markow Demand $3 million (C.C.P. 998) to Cedars-Sinai; $1 million policy limits (C.C.P. 998) to each Rosner; and Thejomurthy Offer Waiver of costs Insurer(s) Trial Details Plaintiff Expert(s) self-insured Cedars-Sinai Medical Center The Doctors Co. for Howard Rosner M.D. Trial Length: 21 Days Jury Deliberations: 2.5 Days Jury Poll: None reported Jury Composition: 6 male, 6 female David T. Fractor, Ph.D., economics, Pasadena, CA (Arnie E. Goldstein, Howard A. Kapp, Joy Robertson) David P. Goldstein, M.D., anesthesiology, Farmington, NM (Arnie E. Goldstein, Howard A. Kapp, Joy Robertson)

Thomas L. Hedge, Jr., M.D., physical medicine, Northridge, CA (Arnie E. Goldstein, Howard A. Kapp, Joy Robertson) Arthur P. Kowell, M.D., Ph.D., neurology, Encino, CA (Arnie E. Goldstein, Howard A. Kapp, Joy Robertson) Tricia West, R.N., BSN, life care planning, Agoura Hills, CA (Arnie E. Goldstein, Howard A. Kapp, Joy Robertson) Defense Expert(s) Reback) Reback) Mark S. Wallace, M.D., anesthesiology, La Jolla, CA (Raymond R. Moore, Robert C. Andrew H. Woo, M.D., neurology, Santa Monica, CA (Raymond R. Moore, Robert C. Post-Trial Counsel for Rosner and Cedars-Sinai are likely to file post-trial motions. Counsel for Cedars- Sinai claimed one of the motions will argue an inconsistency in the verdict as to fault apportionment, as the jury found Cedars-Sinai was not at fault. Editor's Note This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs' and defense counsel. Plaintiff(s) Demographics Francine Markow Age: None reported Occupation: None reported Gender: Female Married: Yes Children: Yes Michael Markow Children Description: None reported

Age: 64 Years Occupation: retiree Gender: Male Married: Yes Children: Yes Children Description: injured party Written By Dan Israeli