Rearing Fopius arisanus (Sonan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Similar documents
Reproductive Biology of Fopius vandenboschi (Fullaway) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in the Laboratory

Ernest J. Harris, a Roger I. Vargas, b and Eric B. Jang b. Received 18 September 2003; accepted 13 January 2004

The Hawaii Fruit Fly Area-Wide Pest Management Program: Accomplishments and Future Directions

Reproductive biology of Fopius arisanus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae)

The Threat of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly1 to American Agriculture and Efforts Being Made to Counter This Threat2 3

Materials and Methods

Scientific Note. Solanum torvum (Solanaceae), a New Host of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii

Diachasmimorpha longicaudata and D. kraussii (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), potential parasitoids of the olive fruit fly

Sperm Precedence of Irradiated Mediterranean Fruit Fly Males (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Aimé H. Bokonon-Ganta, Xin-geng Wang, and Russell H. Messing 1

(Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a Larval. (Diptera: Tephritidae)

College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA b

A New Eye Mutant, apricot, of the Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis

Review Article. Fopius arisanus, an egg pupal parasitoid of Tephritidae. Overview. CABI Publishing. P. Rousse, 1 * E.J. Harris 2 and S.

Melon Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Genetic Sexing: All-male Sterile Fly Releases in Hawaii

Successful Utilization of the Area-Wide Approach for the Management of Fruit Flies in Hawaii

Todd E. Shelly USDA-APHIS, P.O. Box 1040, Waimanalo, HI 96795; Hawaiian Evolutionary Biology Program, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822

Ecology and Management of Economically Important Fruit Flies

Demographic parameters and biotic factors of two Dacini species, Bactrocera cucurbitae and Dacus ciliatus, on Réunion Island

Effects of Increasing Dosages of Gamma Irradiation on

inside the insectary were 23.5±1.2 and 25.7±0.1oC and 74.5±0.4 and

of Dacus dorsalis1 and Ceratitis capitata1'2'3

HORTSCIENCE 42(6):

Trapping Records of Fruit Fly Pest Species (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Oahu (Hawaiian Islands): Analysis of Spatial Population Trends

Attraction and Feeding Responses of Melon Flies and Oriental Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) to Various Protein Baits with and without Toxicants 1

PT 21: Vapour heat treatment for Bactrocera melanotus and Bactrocera xanthodes on Carica papaya

[fll ~ft:

longicaudata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Thailand

VQ612 Determination of Fruit Fly Host Status for Red Tiger, Shadow, Gemini & Baby-lee Watermelons. MD Jess, RJ Corcoran QDPI

Curre nt Status of the Solanaceous Fruit Fly Control Project in Yonaguni Island. Abstract

USDA-APHIS, Ahiki Street, Waimanalo, HI 96795, and Center for Conservation Research and Training, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI

EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON DEVELOPMENT AND REPRODUCTION OF PEACH FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA ZONATA (SAUND.)(DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)

Full-text Available Online at

Does Mating with Ginger Root Oil-Exposed Males Confer Fitness Benefits to Female Mediterranean Fruit Flies, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)?

All male strains and chemical stimulants: Two ways to boost sterile males in SIT programs. Abstract

OFFSPRING IN RESPONSE TO PARENTAL FEMALE DENSITIES IN THE FRUIT FLY PARASITOID DIACHASMIMORPHA LONGICAUDATA (HYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE: OPIINAE)

Genetic Control Tactic Against Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Insect to Escape Destruction of Perishable Horticulture Crops

Luc Leblanc 1, Roger I. Vargas 2*, and Rudolph Putoa 3

SEX RATIO MANIPULATION BY THE PARASITOID WASP MUSCIDIFURAX RAPTOR IN RESPONSE TO HOST SIZE

The Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Central America

Comparative Toxicity of Certain Pesticides to Peach Fruit Fly, Bactrocera zonata Saunders (Diptera: Tephritidae) under Laboratory Conditions

Survival and development of Bactrocera oleae Gmelin (Diptera:Tephritidae) immature stages at four temperatures in the laboratory

Study some biological aspects of peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) (Diptera: Tephritidae) In laboratory and field

PHYTOSANITARY IRRADIATION TO CONTROL QUARANTINE PESTS

The intestinal microbiota of tephritid fruit flies as a potential tool to improve rearing and the SIT

Proximal mechanisms of the sex ratio and clutch size responses of the wasp Nasonia vitripennis to parasitized hosts

Detection of Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): Performance of Trimedlure Relative to Capilure and Enriched Ginger Root Oil

Biotic Factors Influencing Populations

Introduction. Key Words: SIT, sexual behavior, semiochemical, aromatherapy, Ceratitis capitata.

Department of Zoology, Hazara University, Garden Campus, Mansehra , Pakistan

BIONOMICS OF BACTROCERA DORSALIS (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) AN IMPORTANT PEST OF MANGO (MANGIFERA INDICA) IN JAMMU (J & K) J. S. Tara and Madhvi Gupta*

PILOT APPLICATION OF STERILE INSECT TECHNIQUE FOR THE ORIENTAL FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA PHJLIPPJNENSIS, IN NAOWAY ISLET

BIOLOGY OF GALL FLY, Procontarina matteiana (Kieffer & Cecconi) ON MANGO *JADHAV, K. M., PATEL, R. K. AND PATEL S. A.

Title of the Co-ordinated Research Project: Improving Sterile Male Performance in Fruit Fly Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) Programmes

Entomology and the Evolution of Generic Doses

Ceratitis capitata Wiedmann (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Does Male Sexual Experience Influence Female Mate Choice and Reproduction in the Melon Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)?

Todd E. Shelly USDA-APHIS, Ahiki Street, Waimanalo, HI 96795;

Phytosanitary Irradiation: Technology and Efficacy

The Changing Face of Agriculture: fruit flies, innovation and global trade

Population Density and Percentage of Infestation with Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) in Two Iraqi Provinces

Vol. 30, December 31, MINORU TAMASHIRO2, DAPHNE M. WESTCOT2, WALLACE C. MITCHELL2 and WENDY E. JONES2 ABSTRACT

Fruit fly Programmes in Latin America Pedro Rendón/Walther Enkerlin

Use of Attractants to Suppress Oriental Fruit Fly and Cryptophlebia spp. in Litchi

Impact of host exposure time on mass-rearing of Psyttalia concolor (Hymenoptera Braconidae) on Ceratitis capitata (Diptera Tephritidae)

Tel: ; Fax: URL: Cohen, E., Ph.D. (Head of Department) Shafir, S., Ph.D.

Population Dynamics of Three Species of Genus Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in BARI, Chakwal (Punjab)

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY

Sterile Insect Technique and Control of Tephritid Fruit Flies: Do Species With Complex Courtship Require Higher Overflooding Ratios?

INFLUENCE OF HUMIDITY AND TRIBOLIUM BEETLE FOOD SOUCE ON THE LIFE HISTORY CHARACTERISTICS OF PREDATOR, XYLOCORIS FLAVIPES (HEMIPTERA: ANTHOCORIDAE)

The Hawaii Fruit Fly Areawide Pest Management Programme

REGIONAL STANDARDS FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES GUIDELINES FOR THE CONFIRMATION OF NON-HOST STATUS OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLES TO TEPHRITID FRUIT FLIES

Birth Control for Insects: The Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) for Controlling Fruit Fly (Tephritidae: Diptera) by Releasing Sterile Males

Is Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) a natural host of the Neotropical parasitoids Doryctobracon crawfordi and Opius hirtus?

1. Introduction 1.1 SCOPE

Grant T. McQuate 1, Aimé H. Bokonon-Ganta 2, and Eric B. Jang 1

Risk Management Proposal:

DOI: /BER SHORT COMMUNICATION

Todd E. Shelly, Jon Nishimoto, and Rick Kurashima USDA-APHIS, Ahiki Street, Waimanalo, HI 96795;

Progress. Agric. 18(2) : 93-97, 2007 ISSN

New sanitation techniques for controlling Tephritid Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii

Cold treatments for fruit flies (draft annexes to ISPM No. 28) Steward: Jane Chard

and Exotic Fruit Volatiles

IJIEInt. J. Indust. Entomol. 29(1) (2014)

Radiation doses for sterilization of tephritid fruit flies

Ovarian Development in a Laboratory Strain of the Caribbean Fruit Fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae)

MOSCAMED-Guatemala An evolution of ideas

Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture University of Peradeniya Sri Lanka

Life-cycle Parameters of Aphelenchus avenae. on Botrytis cinerea and Fusarium oxysporum

RESEARCH. Liang-De Tang, 1,2 Xun-Cong Ji, 3 Yun Han, 4 Bu-Li Fu, 1 and Kui Liu 1,2. Journal of Insect Science

BIOL 217 FIELD TRIP TO COLLECT GOLDENRODS

Efficacy of the Mitchell Station, a New Bait-Station for the Control of the Caribbean Fruit Fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Introduction. Development and improvement of rearing techniques for fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of economic importance

(TACHINIDAE: DIPTERA) 1. J.P. Roth2 and E.G. King3

PT 18: Cold treatment for Bactrocera tryoni on Citrus limon

Mediterranean fruit fly

Large scale artificial rearing of Anastrepha sp.1 aff. fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Brazil

Volume 1 Issue 2 April-June,2012 DOSE OF CUE- LURE FOR SUPPRESSION OF MELON FLY POPULATION IN PUMPKIN CHAUDHARY*, F. K. AND PATEL, G. M.

AUGMENTATION IN ORCHARDS: IMPROVING THE EFFICACY OF TRICHOGRAMMA INUNDATION

NAPPO Regional Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (RSPM)

Transcription:

Rearing Proc. Hawaiian Fopius Entomol. arisanus in Soc. Medfly (2007) 39:121 126 121 Rearing Fopius arisanus (Sonan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Ernest J. Harris 1, Renato C. Bautista 2, Roger I. Vargas 3, and Eric B. Jang 3 1 U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, USDA-ARS, 2727 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 USA 2 Plant Pest Control Branch, Plant Industry Division, Hawaii, Department of Agriculture, 1428 South King Street, Honolulu, HI 96814-2512 USA 3 U. S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 4459, Hilo, Hawaii 96720 USA E-mail ernie.harris@ars.usda.gov Abstract. In Hawaii, the egg-larval parasitoid Fopius (=Biosteres) arisanus (Sonan) (= Opius oophilus Fullaway) (Hymenotera: Braconidae) is the most effective parasitoid of its preferred host the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae). Other Hymenopterous parasitoid species introduced into Hawaii still exist but vary considerably in their distribution and effectiveness as biological control agents. Based on field observations of F. arisanus parasitizing medfly in coffee and oriental fruit fly in guava, we postulated that a strain of F. arisanus could be selected in the laboratory to be reared exclusively on medfly. We report the results of these studies. Key words: parasitoid, oriental fruit fly, medfly, parasitoid host adaptation Introduction The Mediterranean fruit fly, (medfly) Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) Diptera: Tephritidae) has worldwide distribution and is one of the most destructive tephritid pests of deciduous and subtropical fruits (Back and Pemberton 1918). Growing concerns over unwanted risks associated with the use of pesticide chemicals have provided a mandate to explore the potential of other fruit fly control strategies that are safe and ecologically non-disruptive. Biological control is a safe and viable alternative that satisfies such requirements. At the USDA-ARS Laboratory in Honolulu, HI, we rear Fopius arisanus (Biosteres arisanus Sonan) (= Opius oophilus Fullaway) on the oriental fruit fly (Harris et al. 1991), Bactrocera (Dacus dorsalis) (Hendel), the parasitoid s natural host. One of the two known opiine egg parasitoids, F. arisanus is abundant in the Hawaiian agroecosystem (Bess 1953; Bess et al. 1961). Thus, introduction of F. arisanus into habitats where medfly is the target host could be beneficial to the success of a classical parasitoid release program and offer a new option for Integrated Pest Management of medfly by augmentatative parasitoid releases. In entomophagous insects, the selection of host-adapted strains is still unexplored, yet considered a promising research area (Zenil et al. 2004). Notwithstanding, we are attempting to raise a colony of medfly adapted strain of F. arisanus. If successful, this may offer a wide range of new possibilities in places where effective parasitoids of medfly are conspicuously absent. Zenil et al. (2004), demonstrated adaptation of F. arisanus to medfly and to Anestrepha spp in Mexico documenting the feasibility of this approach. The work of Quimio and Walter 2001 showed F. arisanus successfully parasitized B. tryoni, B. jarvisi and B. cucumis in Australia further corroborating the capability of F. arisanus to parasitize tephritid fruit flies.

122 Harris et al. Materials and Methods Our approach consisted of rearing F. arisanus sequentially on medfly with expectation of increasing the level of parasitoid adaptation from physiological conditioning with each generation. Based on the work of Harris et al. (1991) and Bautista et al. (1999), we hypothesized that medfly adaptation could be greatly accelerated by laboratory selection. Fopius arisanus was obtained from a colony of parasitoids maintained on oriental fruit fly for ca. 200 generations. For this experiment, oriental fruit fly and medfly eggs were produced from flies reared as larvae on wheat diet (Tanaka el. 1969). Assays were conducted in the laboratory with temperature of 25 C, 69% relative humidity and continuous lighting (24 h). Biological attributes of medfly-reared parasitoids. Preimago (number of days from egg oviposition to adult emergence) in medfly reared parasitoids (FACC) was compared to those of oriental fruit fly reared parasitoids (FABD) (Fig 1). The duration of preimago development was determined from daily emergence of parasitoids in puparial cohorts. The other biological parameters (preimago, progeny/female, adult longevity, and percent female progeny) were quantified from 100 pairs of parasitoids fed with honey and water. Ripe papayas, Carica papaya L. were trimmed into sections (8 X 4 x 1.3 cm) and perforated with about 20 holes (5 mm deep), with a camel hair brush. Each fruit was inoculated with 2,000 freshly laid medfly or oriental fruit fly eggs. Inoculated fruit was exposed to parasitoids inside a cubical cage (30 X 30 X 30 cm) for 24 h. The females in the cubical cages were permitted to lay eggs every 2 days until 95% of reproducing females had died. Mortality of parasitoids was recorded daily. Percent parasitization was determined by individually dissecting 100 eggs per 2 day laying period. The remainder of eggs in fruit sections hatched and were reared on wheat diet (Tanaka et al. 1969) until emergence of parasitoids (Bautista et al. 1999). Preimago development tests were replicated 5 times using fresh batches of hosts and parasitoids each time. Trend in generational productivity of experimental colony. Improvement of parasitoid laboratory production and adaptation was obtained rearing the parasitoid sequentually generation by generation. Ripe papayas, Carica papaya L., were trimmed into sections as described in the previous section. Approximately 5,000 freshly laid medfly eggs (collected within 24h) were inoculated into the fruit by inserting 250 eggs per hole. As many as 5 inoculated fruits were exposed to ~ 4 5,000 parasitoids inside a rectangular cage (61 X 41 X 32 cm). Egg laying by parasitoids commenced when females were 8 10 days old posteclosion. Thereafter, eggs were collected from females every other day for 2 weeks from 5 8 breeding cages simultaneously. Fruits were recovered after exposure to parasitoids for 24 h. Fruits were placed on medfly rearing diet (Tanaka et al. 1969) where the hosts completed larval development. Puparia recovered from parasitoid females which laid their eggs on the same dates were pooled and weighed. A 2-g sample was taken from each puparial batch to generate data on puparial count and parasitoid emergence. Mean percent parasitoid yield per generation was expressed as ratio between total number of emerged parasitoids and total puparia recovered. The remainder of puparia was returned to breeding cages to produce parasitoids for the next generation. Reciprocal cross parasitization of medfly and oriental fruit fly-reared parasitoids. Using the rearing methods previously described, biological parameters generated were quantified by comparing progeny production and sex ratio of FACC parasitoids reared on medfly and switched to oriental fruit and FABD parasitoids reared on B. dorsalis and switched to medfly. This information would be beneficial for understanding reciprocal cross parasitization of medfly and B. dorsalis, which occurs in the field in Hawaii.

Rearing Fopius arisanus in Medfly 123 Figure 1. Attributes of F. arisanus preimago development compared between FACC and FABD. Statistical analysis. Data from each experiment were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS GLM procedure from the SAS System for Windows Version 7.0 1998 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. Means were separated by GLM LSD. Results Biological Attributes of Medfly-Reared Parasitoids: Dissection of parasitized eggs (F12 F14) showed that both FACC and FABD females commenced to lay eggs in fruit fly eggs within 24 hours after emergence. However, FACC females continued to oviposit in medfly eggs up to 36 days post eclosion or 12 days longer than FABD (Fig 3). FACC female mean oviposition period was 8 days longer than FABD females. Gravid females in FACC (as early as F15) produced half as many progeny as FABD females. This corresponds to a mean total progeny of 72 (range = 68 87) produced by a FACC female in her lifetime compared to 150 progeny by FABD on oriental fruit fly. Female progeny sex ratio of 49% in FACC (range = 42 51%) was comparable to a female sex ratio of 51% in FABD (range = 45-56%). FACC adults lived longer than FABD adults with males and females surviving 5 and 9 d longer than those of FABD, respectively. The proportion of dead oriental fruit fly or medfly puparia that resulted from parasitization by F. arisanus was as low as 10%. Although the longevity of FACC adults was higher than FABD adults the difference was not significant (n = 26, F = 1.36, p = 0.248, df = 1, 59). Trend in generational productivity of experimental colony. Fig. 2 shows the trend in parasitoid productivity as rearing on medfly (FACC) progressed from parental (P) to (F25) generation. For comparison purposes corresponding yield data from cohorts of FABD are presented. Substitution of B. dorsalis with medfly eggs as host of F. arisanus resulted in mean progeny yield of only 10% in the P generation compared to 67% of FABD. The drastic effect of the host switch on the yield performance of the test culture was evident in the first few generations (F1 F8) with recovery rates oscillating between 2 and 9%. This evidence

124 Harris et al. Figure 2. Generational trend in the productivity of FACC. Standard deviation shown at top of columns. suggests that only a few F. arisanus females oviposited in FACC eggs or egg hatch and survival was low. In F9, a few more females contributed to the production of progeny. The yield increased and gradual improvement continued thereafter. Interestingly, parasitoid yield fluctuated between peaks in F9, F12, F16 and F21. The reason for this variation is the parasitoid culture was going through the bottle neck of adapting to the new (FACC) host. During this study, a low number of FACC females produced parasitoids in the beginning but the yield increased to a mean progeny yield of ca. 40% in the F25 generation (Fig 2). The same pattern of increase in parasitoid progeny yield by generation was experienced in the development of the FABD colony. Measurement variables were calculated from 760 individuals of FACC and 524 of FABD and compared with SAS GLM LSD. The results, as expected, showed that FABD parasitoid yield was significantly higher than FACC parasitoid yield (n = 26, F = 359.77, p = 0.0001; df = 1, 50). The pattern of increase in FACC yield generation by generation showed that colony establishment was assured. Reciprocal cross parasitization of medfly and oriental fruit fly. Data was summarized on the results of reciprocal cross rearing of F. arisanus on medfly and then on oriental fruit and rearing of F. arisanus on oriental fruit fly and then on medfly. The results showed that when oriental fruit fly is used as the origin host and rearing host of F. arisanus, progeny production of the parasitoid was lowest (16). When medfly was the origin host, oriental fruit fly progeny production was highest (203). When oriental fruit fly was used as the origin host and rearing host progeny production was high (189). When medfly was used as the origin and rearing host, F. arisanus progeny production was low (65). When B. dorsalis was used as the rearing host, F. arisanus parasitoioid progeny production is high. These preliminary results suggest that after host switching is accomplished rearing F. arisanus on medfly, it is better to continue production of the parasitoid on medfly. Switching back to B. dorsalis could result in lower parasitoid progeny production. Therefore F. arisanus adapted to medfly or to B. dorsalis should be maintained in separate colonies in the laboratory. Further study is necessary to verify these preliminary results.

Rearing Fopius arisanus in Medfly 125 Figure 3. Percent parasitism / 100 eggs dissected showing different ppropensity for oviposi tion by female FAB (open bars) and FACC (black bars). Conclusions We demonstrated experimentally the feasibility of establishing a colony of F. arisanus on medfly by sequential rearing resulting in adaptation to medfly. This accomplishment increases possibilities for successful introduction and establishment of F. arisanus into habitats where medfly is the target pest. Successful development of the medfly-adapted strain of F. arisanus should facilitate transfer of this parasitoid and its rearing technology to countries where medfly is the only available host. As a biocontrol agent, a medfly-adapted strain of F. arisanus could compliment the Sterile Insect Technique and other compatible control strategies in the Integrated Pest Management of C. capitata. The medfly adapted strain of F. arisanus provides a new tool for augmentative parasitoid releases to control medfly and oriental fruit fly in area-wide IPM programs in Hawaii and elsewhere Acknowlegement We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Thomas E. Mangine for his untiring support and insights rearing the parasitoids and their hosts for these studies. Literature cited Back, E.A., and C.E. Pemberton. 1918. The Mediterranean fruit fly in Hawaii. USDA Bulletin 536. Bautista, R.C., N. Mochizuki, J.P. Spencer, E.J. Harris, and D.M. Ichimura 1999. Mass-rearing of the tephritid fruit fly parasitoid Fopius arisanus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), Biol. Con. 15:137 144. Bess, H.A. 1953. Status of Ceratitis capitata in Hawaii following introduction of Dacus dorsalis and its parasitoids. Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc. 15: 221 223. Bess, H.A., R. van den Bosch, and F.H. Haramoto. 1961. Fruit fly parasites and their activities in Hawaii. Proc. Haw. Entomol. Soc. 17:367 378.

126 Harris et al. Harris, E.J., and R.Y. Okamoto. 1991. A method for rearing Biosteres arisanus (Sonan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in the Laboratory. J. Econ. Entomol. 64:47 422. Harris, E.J., R.Y. Okamoto, C.Y.L. Lee, and T. Nishida. 1991. Suitability of Dacus dorsalis and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) as hosts of the parasitoid Biosteres arisanus [Hymenoptera: Braconidae] Entomophaga 36:425 430. Quimo, G.M., and G.H. Walter. 2001. Host preference and host suitability in an egg-pupal fruit fly parasitoid, Fopius arisanus (Sonan) (Hym., Braconidae). J. Appl. Ent. 125:135 140. SAS Institute Inc. 1985. SAS Introductory Guide, Third Edition, Cary, N.C. Tanaka, N., L.F. Steiner, K. Ohinata, and R. Okamoto. 1969. Low-cost larval rearing medium for mass production of oriental and Mediterranean fruit fly. J. Econ. Entomol. 62:970 971. Zenil, M., P. Liedo, T. Williams, J. Valle, J. Cancino, and P. Montoya 2004. Reproductive biology of Fopius arisanus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Biol. Con. 29: 169 178.