Study on Health Effects of Mobile Tower Radiation on Human Beings

Similar documents
Epidemiological studies on humans, living around mobile phone base stations

The Hazards of Non-Ionizing Radiation of Telecommunication Mast in an Urban Area of Lagos, Nigeria

American Academy of Environmental Medicine. Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Fields Effect on Human Health

Radiofrequency Exposure and Human Health

Chapter 8. Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation

Donate. Cellular Phone Towers

Health Canada Roles and Responsibilities - Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) and Safety Code 6

Cellular Telephone Use and Cancer. Recently, there has been concern that the use of hand-held cellular telephones may be

OBJECTION against 5 new BTS sites in Ludwigsdorf. Antennas near homes: Increased cancer risk

The Possible Harmful Biological Effects of Low Level Electromagnetic Fields of Frequencies up to 300 GHz. IEE Position Statement - May 2002

Natural background Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Levels on Earth

Health Canada Roles and Responsibilities - Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) and Safety Code 6

Section 1. Executive Summary

Radiophobic Society. Mobile Phone Base Stations. Non-Ionising Radiation (NIR) PUBLIC. Public Misconceptions of Radiation Risk

Short-term exposure to TETRA base stations

CELL PHONE RADIATION AND HEALTH: STRESS RESPONSE, PROTEOMICS, BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER AND OTHER SELECTED ISSUES

Mobile Tower Radiation-An Assessment of Radiation Level and its Health Implications in the Residential Areas of Western Ghats in Idukki, Kerala

H e a lt h E f f e c t s o f E l e c t r o m a g n e t i c F i e l d s

Mobile Phone Base Stations Health and Wellbeing. Michael Kundi Medical University of Vienna

Research proposal. The Effect of In Utero Exposure to Electromagnetic Radiation from Laptop Computers. Sarah H. Khan. Infant Development

EVOLUTION OF ICNIRP GUIDELINES

Addendum C INTERNATIONAL EXPERTS PERSPECTIVE ON THE HEALTH EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS (EMF) AND ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION (EMR).

SUBJECTIVE COMPLAINTS OF PEOPLE LIVING NEAR MOBILE PHONE BASE STATIONS IN POLAND

Mobile Telephony: Evidence of Harm? Bernard Veyret (F)

DOWNLOAD OR READ : IONIZING RADIATION EFFECTS IN ELECTRONICS FROM MEMORIES TO IMAGERS DEVICES CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS BOOK 50 PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

RF and Health: A WHO Perspective

RF and Health: A WHO Perspective

Recent Advances in Bioelectromagnetics Research on Mobile Telephony and Health An Introduction

A socio-psychological analysis of the characteristics and needs for information and communication of EMF Hypersensitives

What is the problem? Tip of the Iceberg! Electromagnetic Exposure in Schools. Cell Towers & Schools: Waves. Frequency: cycles/second = Hertz

Briefing for the California Public Utilities Commission on Smart Meters and Potential Health Impacts

United States District Court. District of Oregon. Portland Division

Predicting Health Effects of Electromagnetic Pollution in Algeria Using Fuzzy Logic

ICNIRP (the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection)

Briefing for the California Public Utilities Commission on Smart Meters and Potential Health Impacts

International Journal of Academic Research ISSN: Vol.1 Issue.2, August, 2014

Effects of Mobile Phone and Base Station Radiations on Living Being

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

CHAPTER 28 RADIATION CONTROL

Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA) Fact Sheet and Position Statement on Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields

Volume 7, Issue 3, March 2019 International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies

International EMF Policy Developments

Questionnaire to register adverse health effects caused by high frequency electromagnetic fields (HF EMF)

Occupational Health and Safety Code 2006 Part 20 Explanation Guide

Yes, there really are health risks from wireless radiation exposure! VOTE NO ON SB 649!

EMF Safety Guidelines - The ICNIRP View -

TETRA Industry Group

Electric and Magnetic fields in the Environment

Committee of the Whole Meeting Town of Richmond Hill March 25, 2013

Summary Report on the Status of Research Related to Radiofrequency Field Exposure and Health

Power Frequency and Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields

1. INTRODUCTION. 1.1 Mobile telephony

YOUR SANCTUARY. for the modern world.

Think back to last big teach...

Power Lines and Health: The Evidence and Public Policy

HEALTH PROTECTION AGAINST EMFs: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES

L INTERPETAZIONE DEI DATI SCIENTIFICI: L AZIONE EMF-NET. Paolo Ravazzani

A Basic Summary of the Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Sickness

Biological Effects of Cell Tower Radiation on Human Body

WHO Research Agenda for RF fields

Nominations from FDA s Center from Device and Radiological Health. Radio Frequency Radiation Emissions of Wireless Communication Devices (CDRH)

The Environment and Childhood Cancer: What We Know and Don t Know. Overview of Presentation

Effect of Geopathic Stress and its correction on human body and machinery breakdown

CH.2 LIGHT AS A WAVE

Awareness of the Effects of Telecommunication Mast on Study Habits among Niger Delta University Students, Amassoma

FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM FOR NOISE POLLUTION AND HEALTH EFFECTS IN MINE SITE

12 HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT

We have definitive evidence for biological effects at low RF exposure.!

Conclusions of the BioInitiative Report. Michael Kundi Medical University of Vienna BioInitiative Organizing Committee

Why mobile phone masts can be more dangerous than the phones

Nature of Radiation and DNA damage

Electromagnetic Radiation: Penetrating ability *

Answer: <ARPANSA representative to respond>

Probable Health Effects Associated with Base Stations in Communities: The Need for Health Surveys

Ionizing Radiation. Michael J. Vala, CHP. Bristol-Myers Squibb

BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL MONITORING BY NONINVASIVE METHOD USING NEAR INFRA RED SENSOR

Diploma Unit B - Element B7 - Physical agents 2 - Radiation February RMS Publishing. Fourth Edition November 2013

WIRELESS RADIATION AND HEALTH

Trouble with TETRA report

ICNIRP Standard Guidelines and Pulse Modulated Electromagnetic Fields

Documents of the NRPB

Abstract. Introduction. Methodology

WHO International EMF Project IAC Meeting

Health Effects The Government Doesn t Protect You From

A REVIEW OF SOME RF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES

Proof of principle tests confirm genotoxic potential of RF-EMF

Health Risks Assessment A WHO perspective. Dr E. van Deventer

INFLUENCE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION PRODUCED BY MOBILE PHONE ON VISCOSITY OF HUMAN BLOOD

INCREASED INCIDENCE OF CANCER NEAR A CELL- PHONE TRANSMITTER STATION.

A Cellular Phone Tower on Ossining High School?

PHYSICS 2: HSC COURSE 2 nd edition (Andriessen et al) CHAPTER 20 Radioactivity as a diagnostic tool (pages 394-5)

Survey of Radiation Dose Levels in Patients in X-Ray Units of Some Selected Hospitals in Jos Metropolis

MOBILE PHONE RELATED-HAZARDS AND SUBJECTIVE HEARING AND VISION SYMPTOMS IN THE SAUDI POPULATION

REPLY TO. Comments on Prof Girish Kumar s presentation at the ASSOCHAM EMF Workshop 7 th Feb 2012, New Delhi. Prof. Girish Kumar IIT Bombay

16 January 2014 STATEMENT WITH REGARD TO HEALTH DANGERS FROM SMART METERS

A Review of the Potential Health Risks of Radiofrequency Fields from Wireless Telecommunication Devices

King s Research Portal

What does photon energy tell us about cellphone safety?

Importance of Dosimetry for Microwave Radiation including WiFi

Transcription:

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-56 Volume: 4 Issue: 11 Nov -17 www.irjet.net p-issn: 2395-72 Study on Health Effects of Mobile Tower Radiation on Human Beings Shashank Vijay 1, Dr. Mahendra Pratap Choudhary 2 1M. Tech. (Environmental) Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Rajasthan Technical University, Kota, India 2Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Rajasthan Technical University, Kota, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract Cell phones have become the basic need of today and there has been an unprecendented growth of mobile industry in India during the last decade. Every technology has some positive as well as negative impacts. There has been a public concern over the adverse impacts of harmful radiation from mobile towers and mobile phones on human health. Social activisits and some NGO s are resisting the erection of mobile towers in residential colonies. A study on the quantification of electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation from mobile towers and their health impacts on human beings have been carried out in Kota city of Rajasthan. It has been noticed that EMF radiation from almost 5% of the mobile towers installed in Kota city is beyond the permissible limits prescribed by the DoT, Govt. of India. To get an idea of harmful health impacts on human beings, a public survey through questionnaire was also held. The results of public survey indicate that people have seen a rise in health related issues since last decade, when installation of mobile towers has got momentum. However, the public is not sure whether it is due to EMF radiation of mobile towers or otherwise. Hence, based on studies and research carried out so far, it can be concluded that although there is no scientific cause behind harmful radiation from mobile towers, there is an increase in shortterm and long-term diseases in general. Key Words: Mobile tower, mobile phone, electromagnetic field radiation, health effects, diseases 1.1 Frequency Range of Radiation The frequency range of non-ionizing radiation is from 1 Hz to 1THz (i.e. GHz) and that of the ionizing radiation is above 1THz. Therefore, non-ionizing radiation has less health effects on human beings whereas ionizing radiation can change the chemical bonds of human tissues and even genetic damage can also occur. 1.2 Effects of EMF Radiation Effects of EMF radiation can be divided into two categories: Bio-effects and health effects. Bio-effects can be measured against any change in the atmosphere and these may not be harmful to human health. Bio-effects are again classified into two types, thermal and non-thermal effects. Thermal effects are due to the heat generated when EMF radiation is absorbed whereas non-thermal effects are due to the induced electromagnetic effects inside the biological cells of the body, which may be more harmful. Health effects are those changes which may be either short term or long term and they stress the system and may be harmful to human health. 1.3 EMF Radiation from Mobile Services 1. INTRODUCTION Electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation is defined as the flow of photons in space. The photons contain energy and depending on the amount of energy found in these photos, different types of radiations are defined. EMF radiations are classified into two types, known as ionizing radiation and non-ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiations are those which contain energy sufficient to overcome the binding energy of electrons in atoms or molecules, and hence creating ions. Examples of ionizing radiation are UV rays, X-rays, gamma rays, cosmic rays etc. Non-ionizing radiations are those which do not carry much energy per quantum to ionize atoms or molecules. Examples are low frequency radiations such as radio waves, microwaves, and infrared radiations. The EMF radiation in mobile services originates from two sources, base transceiver station (BTS) and mobile handsets. These radiations are relatively at the low end of the electromagnetic spectrum and hence the energy carried by them is unable to break chemical bonds in molecules. Therefore, they fall under the non-ionizing radiation category. To provide mobile services in a particular area, telecom companies install their base transceiver station (BTS), at suitable locations, according to their radio frequency (RF) network planning for better coverage of the area and for meeting consumer requirements. The mobile towers have antennas which radiate electro-magnetic power. The BTS also contains radio transmitters whose outputs are combined and fed via cables to the base station antenna, which is mounted at the top of the mast. 17, IRJET Impact Factor value: 6.171 ISO 91:8 Certified Journal Page 1548

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-56 Volume: 4 Issue: 11 Nov -17 www.irjet.net p-issn: 2395-72 The actual source of radiation is the transmitting antenna and not the transmitter itself, because the transmitting antenna is the main source which determines electromagnetic field distribution in the surrounding area of a transmitting station. 1.4 Radiation Pattern of a Mobile Tower Antenna Radiation is highest from the primary lobes in the horizontal direction. The direct exposure towards the primary lobes along the line of antenna is the most severe case of the exposed radiation. Radiation from secondary lobes ranges from medium to very low. The distance from the source of radiation is also an important factor. The power density varies by (1/R2), where R is the distance. The pattern of radiation is shown in the figure below. In 8, Department of Telecommunication (DoT), Govt. of India has adopted the ICNIRP Guidelines and prescribed limits/levels for antennas (Base Station Emissions) for general public exposure. However, from 12, norms of mobile towers EMF exposure limits have been revised to 1/th of the existing prescribed limits of ICNIRP as a matter of abundant precaution, as shown in table 1: Table1: Revised EMF Radiation Norms for Mobile Towers in India Frequency in MHz ICNIRP Radiation norms Revised DoT Norms effective from 1.9.12 9 4.5 watt/m 2.45 watt/m 2 18 9 watt/m 2.9 watt/m 2.5 watt/m 2 1.5 watt/m 2 Present limit for antennae (Base station) EMF emission for general public exposure are as per the table 2, given below: Table 2: Permissible Limits for Cell Phone Antenna 2. LITERATURE SURVEY The international organizations like WHO and others have made it clear that there is no convincing evidence between EMF exposures and health effects in human beings. Moreover, various academic studies have been published worldwide on the effects of EMF radiation deriving from mobile towers. Some studies report the absence of any risk to human beings from EMF radiations, whereas others report the presence of a risk; however, most of them are away from any conclusive remarks and come with the usual academic stipulation about further studies. In short, there are no clear-cut scientific evidences available as of today which can establish direct relationship between mobile tower EMF radiation and diseases in human beings. 3. EMF RADIATION NORMS IN INDIA International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) is an international body which studies possible adverse effects on human health from exposure to non-ionising radiation. Frequency Range E-field strength (Volt/m) H-field strength (Amp/m) Power density (Watt/m 2 ) 4 MHz -.434f 1/2.11f 1/2 f/ MHz 2GHz - 3GHz 19.29.5 1 Where f is the frequency in MHz. 4. METHODOLOGY AND PUBLIC SURVEY To study the effect of EMF radiation from mobile towers, first it was decided to measure the radiation emission from mobile towers in Kota. We divided the city into four zones and in each zone, total sampling locations were identified. So, overall 4 mobile towers were studied from all the zones. The following zones were taken up: 1. Residential area (Zone-A) 2. Commercial area (Zone-B) 3. Agriculture and rural area (Zone-C) 4. Highway and far flung area (Zone-D) After zone wise distribution of mobile towers, observations of radiations from mobile towers were made using a mobile app known as EMF detector and mobile tower radiation detector. The measurements were taken for a year long period from April 16 to March 17 throughout the Kota city in residential area, highways, farflung agriculture area and commercial area. Total 4 observations have been recorded using detector. 17, IRJET Impact Factor value: 6.171 ISO 91:8 Certified Journal Page 1549

Percentag eof Respondents Percentage of Respondents Percentage of Respondents International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-56 Volume: 4 Issue: 11 Nov -17 www.irjet.net p-issn: 2395-72 Simultaneously, a public survey was also conducted in all the zones to get views of public regarding any health effects on mobile radiation and status of diseases in their families. The survey was performed through a properly designed questionnaire and then the responses were analyzed with the help of statistical tools. The final results of the public survey are represented here. 72% of the respondents accepted that installation of mobile towers in their locality has affected their lives in some or the other way, while 28% were not sure whether mobile towers have anything to do with their normal daily lives. Short Term Diseases reported by Respondents 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Out of the designed questionnaire, the results of important questions are presented below in graphical form. The respondents were asked to tell the number of years of mobile tower installation in their locality. The following graph shows the response. 9 8 7 6 5 48 72 9 5 86 3 25 Years of Mobile Tower Installation in Study Area 4 3 7 5 3 15 5 16 24 12 6 5 5 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Years of Mobile Tower Installation It shows that most the towers are installed during last five years and hence their effect on human health will show only the short-term effects. Although, there were some mobile towers as old as years of installation and they may represent some cases of long-term diseases, if any, reported by the respondents. 8 7 6 5 4 3 Whether Mobile Towers have affected human lives? 72 Yes Response of Public Survey 28 No The respondents were asked about occurrence of any of the 13 types of short-term and common diseases. When asked regarding some kind of discomfort, irritation or disease after installation of mobile towers in their vicinity, the respondents replied positively and about 9% respondents admitted that they are facing problem of headache. 86% accepted that they are undergoing depression, 72% reported sleep disturbance (insomnia), 5% reported nausea, 48% reported fatigue and likewise others also told that they are facing some type of physical and mental illness due to these mobile towers. However, they were not aware of the exact reason of their illness and discomfort, but they agreed that before the installation of towers, there were less number of evidences of such common diseases in their families. The older persons in their families accepted that they never faced such type of diseases in their lives but these days, even young children are also complaining about such problems. Hence, it can be inferred that, although radiation from mobile towers may not be the exact cause behind these diseases, but there is some linkage between either the radiation or the overall scenario due to mobile towers (creating air or noise pollution) and the public health. 17, IRJET Impact Factor value: 6.171 ISO 91:8 Certified Journal Page 155

Percentage of Respondents International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-56 Volume: 4 Issue: 11 Nov -17 www.irjet.net p-issn: 2395-72 Long Term Diseases reported by Respondents 7 64 6 5 5 [2] Agarwal A. et al, Relationship between cell phone use and human fertility: an observational study, Oasis, The Online Abstract Submission System, 6 [3] Alka Sharma et al, Cell Phone Radiations and Health Impacts: An Overview, International Journal of Geology, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 2 (2) May-August 12, pp.245-256 4 3 14 22 [4] Bio-initiative Report, A Rationale for a Biologicallybased Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF), 7 [5] Divan H A, Kheifets L, Obel C J, Olsen, J, Prenatal and Postnatal Exposure to Cell Phone Use and Behavioural Problems in Children, Epidemiology, 8 [6] Effects of Electromagnetic Field Radiation from Mobile Towers and Handsets, Information Paper by Telephone Regulatory Authority of India, 3 th July 14. Regarding long-term health effects of mobile tower installation, the 64% respondents complained that they have become patients of asthma, 5% respondents blamed these mobile towers for cancer, 22% for Alzheimer s disease, 14% for multiple sclerosis and % for brain tumor. 6. CONCLUSIONS It has been found that out of the total observed mobile towers; almost 5% are in the category of medium to high risk level. This is an alarming situation that mobile towers are emitting radiation beyond the permissible limits and common man is not aware of this fact. During public survey, it has been accepted by the people that they are facing some kind of physical or mental illness after the installation of mobile towers. In fact, in short term duration, the ill-effects of radiation are not known properly or sometimes people do not take them seriously. But in long-terms, the harmful environmental and health issues may prove to be very critical and therefore, it is the right time to take precautionary measures by doing more research and detailed study on human health REFERENCES [1] Abdel-Rassoul et al, E (March 7). "Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations"(pdf). NeuroToxicology (New York, NY: Elsevier Science) 28 (2) [7] Hutter, H-P; H Moshammer, P Wallner, M Kundi (May 1, 6). "Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations". Occupational and Environmental Medicine (London, UK: the BMJ Publishing Group) 63 (5): 37 313. [8] ICNIRP - International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection- Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 3 GHz), Health Phys, 1998, 74:494-522 [9] Karinen A, Heinävaara S, Nylund R, Leszczynski D, Mobile phone radiation might alter protein expression in human Skin, BMC Genomics, Finland, 8, 9:77 [] Kesari, K.K.; Behari, J.; Effect of mobile phone radiation exposure on reproductive system of male rats, IEEE8, 564 567 [11] Lai H, Singh NP Magnetic-field-induced DNA strand breaks in brain cells of the rat, Environmental Health Perspectives, 112, 687-694, 4 [12] Levitt B, Lai H, Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays, Environ. Rev. 18: 369 395, [13] Lin H, Opler M, Head M, Blank M, Goodman R., Electromagnetic field exposure induces rapid, transitory heat shock factor activation in human cells, J Cell Biochem. 1997 Sep 15; 66(4):482-8 17, IRJET Impact Factor value: 6.171 ISO 91:8 Certified Journal Page 1551

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-56 Volume: 4 Issue: 11 Nov -17 www.irjet.net p-issn: 2395-72 [14] Luria, Roy; Eliyahu, Ilan; Hareuveny, Ronen; Margaliot, Menachem; Meiran, Nachshon (9). "Cognitive effects of radiation emitted by cellular phones: The influence of exposure side and time". Bioelectromagnetics 3 (3): 198 4.] [15] Maier M, The health hazards of mobile phones. British Medical Journal 3 1288-1289, [16] Santini, R; Santini, P; Danze, JM; LeRuz, P; Seigne, M (January 3). "Survey Study of People Living in the Vicinity of Cellular Phone Base Stations". Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine (London: Informa Healthcare) 22 (1): 41 49. [17] The INTERPHONE Study Group, Brain tumor risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. International Journal of Epidemiology 39(3):675-694 17, IRJET Impact Factor value: 6.171 ISO 91:8 Certified Journal Page 1552