The prevalence of obesity has increased markedly in

Similar documents
Judy Kruger, PhD, MS, Deborah A. Galuska, PhD, MPH, Mary K. Serdula, MD, MPH, Deborah A. Jones, PhD

Projection of Diabetes Burden Through 2050

SUCCESSFUL WEIGHT LOSS AND

THE PREVALENCE OF OVERweight

DATA FROM THE THIRD NAtional

Recommended Levels of Physical Activity and Health- Related Quality of Life Among Overweight and Obese Adults in the United States, 2005

Associations of Trying to Lose Weight, Weight Control Behaviors, and Current Cigarette Use Among US High School Students

Health Concern. Obesity Guilford County Department of Public Health Community Health Assessment

Obesity Trends:

In a recent meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, Miller

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Secular Trends for Childhood BMI, Weight, and Height

Consumers of Dietary Supplements: Gender and Immigrant Status Differences Among College Students

weight perception, weight reduction, telephone interview 183 (16.8 ) 411 (37.7 ) (40.9 ) (31.8 ) (30.4 ) 8.5 ( 2001; 11: )

Why Do We Treat Obesity? Epidemiology

This slide set provides an overview of the impact of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States, focusing on epidemiology, costs both

Increases in morbid obesity in the USA:

APPETITE-SUPPRESSANT DRUGS AND THE RISK OF CARDIAC-VALVE REGURGITATION

Looking Toward State Health Assessment.

Trends in Health Disparities in North Carolina by Region 1

FDA approves Belviq to treat some overweight or obese adults

Progress in the Control of Childhood Obesity

DISPROPORTIONATE IMPACT OF DIABETES IN A PUERTO RICAN COMMUNITY OF CHICAGO

Definitions. Obesity: Having a very high amount of body fat in relation to lean body mass, or Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or higher.

Prevalence of Self-Reported Obesity Among U.S. Adults by State and Territory. Definitions Obesity: Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or higher.

Magnesium intake and serum C-reactive protein levels in children

State-Level Estimates of Annual Medical Expenditures Attributable to Obesity*

Trends in adult obesity

Prevalence of Overweight Among Anchorage Children: A Study of Anchorage School District Data:

David V. McQueen. BRFSS Surveillance General Atlanta - Rome 2006

Clinical and Behavioral Characteristics of HIV-infected Young Adults in Care in the United States

ARTICLE. Prevalence of Diabetes and Impaired Fasting Glucose Levels Among US Adolescents. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey,

Trends in Overweight among

Memphis and Shelby County Behavioral Risk Factors Survey, 2004

Myths, Heart Disease and the Latino Population. Maria T. Vivaldi MD MGH Women s Heart Health Program. Hispanics constitute 16.3 % of US population!

ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION

Age 18 years and older BMI 18.5 and < 25 kg/m 2

ACCULTURATION, WEIGHT, AND WEIGHT-RELATED BEHAVIORS

Age 18 years and older BMI 18.5 and < 25 kg/m 2

Policy Brief: Weight Loss Success among Overweight and Obese Women of Mexican-origin

Estimates of Influenza Vaccination Coverage among Adults United States, Flu Season

Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control

OVERALL TRENDS IN OBESITY

ACCEPTED. Clinical outcomes of young black men receiving HIV medical care in the United States,

Obesity and Control. Body Mass Index (BMI) and Sedentary Time in Adults

The U.S. Obesity Epidemic: Causes, Consequences and Health Provider Response. Suzanne Bennett Johnson 2012 APA President

Diabetes Care 31: , 2008

Prevalence of Obesity in Adult Population of Former College Rowers

A: Epidemiology update. Evidence that LDL-C and CRP identify different high-risk groups

Goal setting frequency and the use of behavioral strategies related to diet and physical activity

Adult overweight and obesity

Changes in Incidence of Diabetes in U.S. Adults,

Objectives 10/11/2013. Diabetes- The Real Cost of Sugar. Diabetes 101: What is Diabetes. By Ruth Nekonchuk RD CDE LMNT

Prevalence of Physical Activity in the United States: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2001

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has received

Obesity in Cleveland Center for Health Promotion Research at Case Western Reserve University. Weight Classification of Clevelanders

Preventive Medicine 55 (2012) Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect. Preventive Medicine

Diabetes Care Publish Ahead of Print, published online February 25, 2010

Chapter 1: CKD in the General Population

We used self-reported data from United Methodist

Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960±1994

Management of Obesity. Objectives. Background Impact and scope of Obesity. Control of Energy Homeostasis Methods of treatment Medications.

National Diabetes Fact Sheet, 2007

Predictors of Perceived Risk of the Development of Diabetes

CHILDHOOD OBESITY CONTINues

High Rates of Obesity and Chronic Disease Among United Methodist Clergy

In the late 1970s, it became apparent that seasonality. Seasonal Variation in Adult Leisure-Time Physical Activity. Epidemiology

in Two South Carolina Communities

Trends in COPD (Chronic Bronchitis and Emphysema): Morbidity and Mortality. Please note, this report is designed for double-sided printing

Monitoring Healthy People 2010 Arthritis Management Objectives: Education and Clinician Counseling for Weight Loss and Exercise

Trends in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus From the 1970s to the 1990s The Framingham Heart Study

What Are the Effects of Weight Management Pharmacotherapy on Lipid Metabolism and Lipid Levels?

Mental Health: The Role of Public Health and CDC

Physical Activity Levels Among the General US Adult Population and in Adults With and Without Arthritis

5. Cardiovascular Disease & Stroke

A n aly tical m e t h o d s

Healthy Montgomery Obesity Work Group Montgomery County Obesity Profile July 19, 2012

KEEP 2009 Summary Figures

Body Mass Index Measurement and Obesity Prevalence in Ten U.S. Health Plans

Are Smokers Only Using Cigarettes? Exploring Current Polytobacco Use Among an Adult Population

Colorado s Progress toward Year 2000 Objectives

The authors assessed drug susceptibility patterns

CHRONIC DISEASE PREVALENCE AMONG ADULTS IN OHIO

Depression Screening: An Effective Tool to Reduce Disability and Loss of Productivity

An Epidemiological Perspective on Type 2 Diabetes Among Adult Men

Prevalence of High C-Reactive Protein in Persons with Serum Lipid Concentrations within Recommended Values

Self-Reported Influenza-Like Illness and Receipt of Influenza Antiviral Drugs During the 2009 Pandemic, United States,

THE HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000 OBjective

OVERWEIGHT AND OBESITY ARE

Prevalence And Trends In Obesity Among Aged And Disabled U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries,

Research Article Prevalence and Trends of Adult Obesity in the US,

Physical Activity and Nutrition in Minnesota

Why Do We Care About Prediabetes?

Adult Immunizations & the Workplace

Age and the Burden of Death Attributable to Diabetes in the United States

The clinical and economic benefits of better treatment of adult Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes

Calories Consumed From Alcoholic Beverages by U.S. Adults,

Michael S. Blaiss, MD

HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE IS AN EStablished

Transcription:

Brief Communication Use of Prescription Weight Loss Pills among U.S. Adults in 1996 1998 Laura Kettel Khan, PhD; Mary K. Serdula, MD; Barbara A. Bowman, PhD; and David F. Williamson, PhD Background: Pharmacotherapy is recommended for the treatment of obese persons with a body mass index of 30 kg/m 2 or higher or a body mass index of at least 27 kg/m 2 plus an obesityrelated comorbid condition. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of use of prescription weight loss pills in the United States in 1996 1998. Design: 1998 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a nationally representative telephone survey. Setting: United States. Results: The 2-year prevalence of pill use was 2.5% (95% CI, 2.1% to 2.9%), or 4.6 million U.S. adults. Use was higher in women than in men (4.0% vs. 0.9%, respectively) and highest among Hispanic respondents (3.2%). Of pill users, 25% were not overweight (body mass index < 27 kg/m 2 ) before using pills. Conclusions: Nearly 5 million U.S. adults used prescription weight loss pills in 1996 1998. However, one quarter of users were not overweight, suggesting that weight loss pills may be inappropriately used, especially among women, white persons, and Hispanic persons. Participants: 139 779 adults 18 years of age and older. Measurements: Self-reported pill use for 1996 1998, body mass index (current and before pill use), age, sex, and race or ethnicity. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:282-286. www.annals.org For author affiliations, current addresses, and contributions, see end of text. The prevalence of obesity has increased markedly in the United States (1), as has approval of weight loss drugs by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In 1959, the FDA approved phentermine, the first prescription appetite suppressant used as a singledrug, short-term treatment for obesity. The FDA approved fenfluramine in 1973 for single-drug, short-term use and dexfenfluramine in 1996 as a single-drug, prescription appetite suppressant for longer-term use in obese persons. From 1995 to mid-1997, fenfluramine or dexfenfluramine was widely used in combination with phentermine ( fen-phen ), often for periods longer than a few weeks (2). After numerous reports of cardiac valvulopathy in persons taking fenfluramine or dexfenfluramine (3), the FDA issued a public health advisory on 8 July 1997 (4) that led to the voluntary withdrawal of the drugs from the U.S. market on 15 September 1997. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimated that between 1995 and 1997, 1.2 to 4.7 million persons in the United States used fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine (3). These figures, however, were not based on population surveys but were indirectly estimated from the number of prescriptions written, with assumptions about the median duration of treatment and mean length of a prescription (5). Thus, the extent to which the population has been exposed to prescription weight loss drugs remains uncertain. In addition, no data were available on the characteristics of persons using the drugs or on whether the drugs were used in accordance with the pharmacotherapy guidelines suggested by the FDA and the 1998 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute consensus statement (6, 7). The purpose of our study was to provide estimates of the 1996 1998 prevalence of the use of prescription weight loss drugs by age, race or ethnicity, and sex by using data from a telephone survey in a sample of U.S. adults. METHODS We examined data from the 1998 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a telephone survey of health practices of adults 18 years of age and older conducted by all U.S. state health departments. Each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico selected an independent probability sample of noninstitutionalized residents through random-digit dialing; the results were pooled for statistical analyses (Schulman J. Can BRFSS data be pooled for national estimates? Presented at the Sixteenth Annual Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 16 May 1999). In 1998, 149 806 persons responded to the BRFSS. (A detailed description of survey methods and quality control indices has been published elsewhere 282 20 February 2001 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 134 Number 4 www.annals.org

Use of Prescription Diet Pills in the United States Brief Communication [8].) In 1998, the median upper-bound response rate for individual states (completed interviews divided by completed, refused, and terminated interviews) was 73.4% (range, 45.4% to 95.4%). Body mass index (BMI) at the time of survey completion (current use) and before use of weight control pills was calculated as the self-reported weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared and was categorized in five groups: normal weight ( 25 kg/m 2 ); preobesity (25 to 29 kg/m 2 ), obesity grade I (30 to 34 kg/m 2 ), obesity grade II (35 to 39 kg/m 2 ), and obesity grade III ( 40 kg/m 2 ) (7). According to guidelines of the FDA and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, pharmacotherapy may be considered for persons who are clinically obese (body mass index 30 kg/m 2 ) or have a body mass index between 27 and 30 kg/m 2 plus an obesity-related comorbid condition (for example, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, or cardiovascular disease) (6, 7). Because the BRFSS survey did not collect complete information on comorbid conditions, we conservatively defined inappropriate pill use as reported use of weight loss pills in a person with a body mass index less than 27 kg/m 2 before pill use. Of the 149 806 respondents, we excluded those who did not report on pill use (1561 persons), weight before pill use (487 persons), current weight (5229 persons), height (1369 persons), pregnancy status (1780 persons), or sociodemographic characteristics or weight loss behavior (964 persons). We also excluded 88 respondents because the reported weight, height, or body mass index was outside the sex-specific reference values from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1989 1994 (9). After exclusions, our study sample consisted of 139 779 respondents. To perform statistical analyses, we used SUDAAN software (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina), which could accommodate our complex sampling design (10). Survey weights were used to produce U.S. population estimates. RESULTS In 1996 1998, an estimated 2.5% (95% CI, 2.3% to 2.7%) of U.S. adults used prescription weight loss pills (Table 1). The 2-year prevalence was four times higher among women (4.0%) than men (0.9%) and was one third higher among Hispanic respondents (3.2%) than non-hispanic white (2.4%) or non-hispanic black (2.4%) respondents. Among men, pill use was highest in respondents 35 to 64 years of age, and among women, pill use was highest in those aged 25 to 44 years. Use of prescription weight loss pills increased with current body mass index (Table 1). Among women, the 2-year prevalence of pill use was lowest (1.5% [95% CI, 1.3% to 1.7%]) in those with a current body mass index less than 25 kg/m 2 but was substantially higher (17.7% [CI, 15.2% to 20.2%]) in those with a current body mass index of 40 kg/m 2 or greater. A similar relationship between pill use and current body mass index was observed among men but with consistently lower values (range, 0.2% to 9.1%). The sex-specific pattern of pill use for current body mass index was similar for all racial and ethnic groups (Table 1). Overall, prescription weight loss pills were used by 3.1% (CI, 2.5% to 3.7%) of obese men (body mass index 30 kg/m 2 ) and 10.2% (CI, 9.4% to 11.0%) of obese women. In an analysis restricted to persons who reported use of prescription weight loss pills (n 3822), we found that 56.1% (CI, 53.5% to 58.7%) of this group were obese before using these pills (Table 2). However, 25.3% (CI, 22.9% to 27.7%) were below the minimum recommended body mass index of 27 kg/m 2. Among persons with a body mass index less than 27 kg/m 2, pill use was twice as likely among women as men (27.9% [CI, 25.1% to 30.7%] vs. 13.2% [CI, 11.2% to 15.2%]) and almost twice as likely among non-hispanic white and Hispanic respondents (26.1% [CI, 24.7% to 27.5%] vs. 26.4% [CI, 22.9% to 29.9%]) as non-hispanic black respondents (15.0% [CI, 12.2% to 17.8%]). At the time of the survey, 0.5% ([CI, 0.48% to 0.52%]) of respondents were currently using prescription weight loss pills. Paralleling the 2-year prevalence of pill use, the rate for current reported use in women (0.8% [CI, 0.6% to 1.00%]) was fourfold that of men (0.2% [CI, 0.18% to 0.22%]). Except for a peak in current use in October (1.0% [CI, 0.96% to 1.04%]), little seasonal or monthly variation was seen in pill use during 1998 (range, 0.4% to 1.0%). DISCUSSION From this population-based study, we estimate that 4.6 million U.S. adults used prescription pills for weight loss in 1996 1998. Women were four times as likely as www.annals.org 20 February 2001 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 134 Number 4 283

Brief Communication Use of Prescription Diet Pills in the United States men to report pill use. Reported use was similar in white and black respondents but was about one third higher among Hispanic respondents than in white and black respondents. Although Hispanic persons have shown a greater inclination toward antibiotic use compared with non-hispanic persons (11), without more information we cannot speculate on reasons for the higher use of weight loss pills among Hispanic respondents in the current study. Pill use increased with increasing body mass index and was three times higher among obese women than obese men. Among severely obese respondents (body mass index 40 kg/m 2 ), the rate of pill use was nearly twice as high in women as men. Reported use of prescription weight loss pills was also substantial among adults who were not obese. In our analysis, we used a conservative definition of appropriate pill use a body mass index of 27 kg/m 2 or greater. We estimate that one eighth of men and more than one fourth of women who used prescription weight loss pills in 1997 1998 had a pre-pill body mass index less than the minimum body mass index of 27 kg/m 2 suggested in the FDA and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines. Thus, we estimate that at least 1.2 million adults may have inappropriately used pills in that period. Inappropriate pill use was substantially higher among non- Hispanic white and Hispanic respondents than non- Hispanic black respondents. Our analysis is limited by the lack of information on the specific prescription drugs used, duration of drug use, dosage, and weight loss during use of the drug. Because the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System did not ask about drugs used concurrently with prescription weight loss pills, no conclusions can be made about Table 1. Two-Year Prevalence of Use of Prescription Weight Loss Pills among U.S. Adults* Characteristic Survey Respondents Non-Hispanic White (n 112 009) Non-Hispanic Black (n 11 384) Hispanic (n 11 311) Other (n 5075) Total (95% CI) (n 139 779) 4OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO % OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO3 Male 0.9 0.6 1.3 0.2 0.9 (0.7 1.1) Female 3.9 3.8 5.2 2.8 4.0 (3.8 4.2) Total 2.4 2.4 3.2 1.4 2.5 (2.3 2.7) Age Male 18 24 y 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.4 (0.2 0.6) 25 34 y 0.7 0.7 1.3 0.1 0.8 (0.6 1.0) 35 44 y 1.2 0.3 0.9 0.1 1.1 (0.9 1.3) 45 54 y 1.2 0.3 1.4 0.3 1.1 (0.9 1.3) 55 64 y 1.1 1.4 2.1 0.3 1.2 (0.8 1.6) 65 y 0.4 1.4 2.9 0.6 0.7 (0.5 0.9) Female 18 24 y 3.0 3.2 3.8 0.6 3.0 (2.4 3.6) 25 34 y 5.9 6.1 6.6 2.8 5.9 (5.3 6.5) 35 44 y 5.8 5.2 6.4 5.0 5.8 (5.2 6.4) 45 54 y 5.2 4.1 7.1 4.1 5.3 (4.7 5.9) 55 64 y 2.8 1.7 2.0 1.0 2.6 (2.2 3.0) 65 y 1.2 0.6 0.7 0.6 1.1 (0.7 1.5) Current body mass index Male 25 kg/m 2 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.2 (0.198 0.202) 25 29 kg/m 2 0.4 0.1 1.3 0.5 0.5 (0.3 0.7) 30 34 kg/m 2 2.1 1.3 1.9 0.2 2.0 (1.6 2.4) 35 39 kg/m 2 6.2 4.1 5.0 0.5 5.6 (3.8 7.4) 40 kg/m 2 11.0 4.3 1.5 0.0 9.1 (6.7 11.5) Female 25 kg/m 2 1.5 1.0 1.8 0.8 1.5 (1.3 1.7) 25 29 kg/m 2 5.0 2.9 6.5 3.7 4.9 (4.5 5.3) 30 34 kg/m 2 8.3 6.2 8.9 12.4 8.1 (7.1 9.1) 35 39 kg/m 2 11.8 8.4 13.0 7.3 11.2 (9.6 12.8) 40 kg/m 2 19.7 13.7 15.3 12.9 17.7 (15.2 20.2) * Adults refers to respondents 18 years of age and older. 284 20 February 2001 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 134 Number 4 www.annals.org

Use of Prescription Diet Pills in the United States Brief Communication Table 2. U.S. Adults Who Used Prescription Weight Loss Pills, according to Body Mass Index before Pill Use* Body Mass Index Survey Respondents Non-Hispanic White (n 3058) Non-Hispanic Black (n 305) Hispanic (n 367) Other (n 92) Total (95% CI) (n 3822) 4OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO % OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO3 27 kg/m 2 Male 12.8 8.7 15.9 26.1 13.2 (9.2 17.2) Female 29.1 15.7 29.0 33.3 27.9 (25.1 30.7) Total 26.1 15.0 26.4 32.6 25.3 (22.9 27.7) 27 30 kg/m 2 Male 11.0 6.2 37.2 16.9 15.2 (11.1 19.3) Female 20.8 12.6 18.9 2.6 19.2 (16.6 22.0) Total 19.1 11.8 22.6 4.0 18.6 (16.2 21.0) 30 kg/m 2 Male 76.2 85.1 46.9 57.0 71.6 (65.3 77.9) Female 50.1 71.7 52.1 64.1 52.9 (49.9 55.9) Total 54.8 73.2 51.0 63.4 56.1 (53.5 58.7) 40 kg/m 2 Male 21.3 21.7 4.4 3.9 18.3 (13.2 23.4) Female 12.7 23.5 7.1 7.3 12.8 (11.0 14.6) Total 14.2 23.3 6.6 6.7 13.8 (12.0 15.6) * Adults refers to respondents 18 years of age and older. the potential for adverse effects or drug interactions. Self-reported weight may also be a concern because many people, especially those who are relatively heavy, may under-report their weight (12, 13). Although the number of pills prescribed may have decreased immediately before the survey, no data are available for prevalence by month in 1997. However, the prevalence of current use throughout 1998 did not vary by month or season, except in October 1998, which was nearly 1 year after the public advisory on fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine. Our data indicate that one quarter of U.S. adults who use prescription weight loss pills were not overweight when the pills were prescribed. Other data suggest that more than one third of overweight persons do not meet recommendations for physical activity and dietary practices (12). Furthermore, fewer than half of physicians counsel overweight persons about weight control (14). Taken together, these findings suggest that many overweight persons lack the knowledge or ability to implement lifestyle changes effectively. Patients might be better served if more of them were counseled about long-term weight control and if their physicians adhered more closely to recommendations for initiation of pharmacotherapy. Furthermore, given the increasing prevalence of obesity in the United States, as well as the availability of new prescription weight loss drugs, future investigations of weight-control behaviors and prescription practices are needed. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Requests for Single Reprints: Laura Kettel Khan, PhD, Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Mailstop K26, Atlanta, GA 30341; e-mail, LDK7@cdc.gov. Current Author Addresses: Drs. Khan, Serdula, and Bowman: Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Mailstop K26, Atlanta, GA 30341. Dr. Williamson: Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Mailstop K26, Atlanta, GA 30341. Author Contributions: Conception and design: L.K. Khan, M.K. Serdula, B.A. Bowman, D.F. Williamson. Analysis and interpretation of the data: L.K. Khan, M.K. Serdula, B.A. Bowman, D.F. Williamson. Drafting of the article: L.K. Khan, M.K. Serdula, B.A. Bowman, D.F. Williamson. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: L.K. Khan, M.K. Serdula, B.A. Bowman, D.F. Williamson. Final approval of the article: L.K. Khan, M.K. Serdula, B.A. Bowman, D.F. Williamson. Provision of study materials or patients: L.K. Khan, M.K. Serdula, B.A. Bowman, D.F. Williamson. Statistical expertise: L.K. Khan. www.annals.org 20 February 2001 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 134 Number 4 285

Brief Communication Use of Prescription Diet Pills in the United States References 1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL. Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960-1994. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;22:39-47. [PMID: 0009481598] 2. Connolly HM, Crary JL, McGoon MD, Hensrud DD, Edwards BS, Edwards WD, et al. Valvular heart disease associated with fenfluraminephentermine. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:581-8. [PMID: 0009271479] 3. Cardiac valvulopathy associated with exposure to fenfluramine or dexfenfluramine: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services interim public health recommendations, November 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;46: 1061-6. [PMID: 0009385873] 4. Lumpkin MM. FDA health advisory. FDA Bull. 1997;27:2. 5. IMS America Ltd. National Prescription Audit. Basic Data Report. Ambler, PA: IMS America Ltd; 1997. 6. Physicians Desk Reference. 58th ed. Oradell, NJ: Medical Economics; 1997. 7. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U.S.). Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in cooperation with the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 1998. 8. Nelson DE, Holtzman D, Waller M, Leutzinger CL, Condon K. Objectives and design of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Methods, American Statistical Association National Meeting: Dallas, TX; 1998 9. National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.). Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988 1994. NHANES III Reference Manuals and Reports [computer file]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Hyattsville, MD: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996. 10. Shah BV, Barnwell BG, Bieler GS. SUDAAN User s Manual. Release 7.5. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 1997. 11. McKee MD, Mills L, Mainous AG 3rd. Antibiotic use for the treatment of upper respiratory infections in a diverse community. J Fam Pract. 1999;48:993-6. [PMID: 0010628580] 12. Serdula MK, Mokdad AH, Williamson DF, Galuska DA, Mendlein JM, Heath GW. Prevalence of attempting weight loss and strategies for controlling weight. JAMA. 1999;282:1353-8. [PMID: 0010527182] 13. Rowland ML. Self-reported weight and height. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;52: 1125-33. [PMID: 0002239790] 14. Galuska DA, Will JC, Serdula MK, Ford ES. Are health care professionals advising obese patients to lose weight? JAMA. 1999;282:1576-8. [PMID: 0010546698] 286 20 February 2001 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 134 Number 4 www.annals.org