Use of Treponemal Immunoassays for Screening and Diagnosis of Syphilis

Similar documents
Replaces: 04/13/17. / Formulated: 7/05 SYPHLIS

Serological screening for syphilis in HIV-infected individuals: is a non-treponemal test adequate in the era of increasing of new syphilis infections?

Syphilis Treatment Protocol

SYPHILIS (Treponema pallidum) IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION STD PROGRAM

Direct Comparison of the Traditional and Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithms

Susanne Norris Zanto, MPH, MLS (ASCP) CM, SM Montana Public Health Laboratory

Syphilis Technical Instructions for Civil Surgeons

9/9/2015. Began to see a shift in 2012 Early syphilis cases more than doubled from year before

Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2015

4/18/2018. Syphilis Testing. Disclosure. Learner Objectives. Outline. Employee and stockholder of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

Public/Private Partnerships: Intervening in the Spread of Syphilis

Didactic Series. STD Screening & Management: Syphilis. Christian B. Ramers, MD, MPH

10/19/2012. Serologic Testing for Syphilis. Disclosures. Comparison of the Traditional and Reverse Screening Algorithms. Outline.

Management of Syphilis in Patients with HIV

Sex, Sores, Science, and Surveillance: Syphilis in the 21 st Century (U046)

Sex, Sores, Science, and Surveillance: Syphilis in the 21 st Century (U046)

Nothing to disclose.

SYPHILIS. The Great Pretender K. Amen Eguakun, MSN, APRN, AAHIVS

Background. Restricted Siemens Healthcare GmbH, >1 year Late latent syphilis. Restricted Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 2017

Sexually transmitted infections (in women)

January Dear Physician:

2/13/ Graphic photographs or cartoons used during this presentation might be offensive to some; for this I apologize in advance.

Sexually transmitted infections (in women)

Learning Objectives. Syphilis. Lessons. Epidemiology: Disease in the U.S. Syphilis Definition. Transmission. Treponema pallidum

The Use of a Rapid Syphilis Test with Specimens from an HIV Cluster Investigation in Rural West Virginia

Lisa Villarroel, MD MPH Medical Director, Division of Public Health Preparedness Arizona Department of Health Services.

Discordant Results from Reverse Sequence Syphilis Screening Five Laboratories, United States,

To view an archived recording of this presentation please click the following link:

Syphilis Update: New Presentations of an Old Disease

The Great Imitator Revealed: Syphilis

INFECTIOUS SYPHILIS NOTIFICATION FORM

Syphilis Testing in Northern California Kaiser

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) makes

CAP Laboratory Improvement Programs. Prevalence of Traditional and Reverse-Algorithm Syphilis Screening in Laboratory Practice

Screening for Syphilis With the Treponemal Immunoassay: Analysis of Discordant Serology Results and Implications for Clinical Management

Sexually Transmitted Disease Treatment Tables

ALASKA NATIVE MEDICAL CENTER SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE SCREENING AND TREATMENT GUIDELINES

Guidance for Industry

5/1/2017. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Burning Questions

Performance Characteristics of the Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithm in a Population With a Moderately High Prevalence of Syphilis

Clinical Education Initiative TITLE: UPDATE ON MSM SEXUAL HEALTH. Speaker: Maureen Scahill, MS NP

STD Essentials for the Busy Clinician. Stephanie E. Cohen, MD, MPH

Revisions to the Syphilis Surveillance Case Definitions, 2018

Validation of a New Testing Algorithm for Syphilis in Trinidad & Tobago

WHAT DO U KNOW ABOUT STIS?

Case 1. Case 1. Physical exam

Clinical Practice Objectives

Syphilis Update. Dr. Bauer has no disclosures. STD Clinical Update San Diego California Prevention Training Center October 11, 2018

Comparison of Automated Treponemal and Nontreponemal Test Algorithms as First-Line Syphilis Screening Assays

GENITAL HERPES. 81.1% of HSV-2 infections are asymptomatic or unrecognized. Figure 14 HSV-2 seroprevalence among persons aged years by sex.

Michigan Guidelines: HIV, Syphilis, HBV in Pregnancy

2019 HIV Diagnostics Conference March 27, 2019

2012 California Clinical Laboratory Survey: STD/HIV/Hepatitis Testing

Learning Objectives. Epidemiology 5/3/2013. Treponema pallidum Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention. Anne Rompalo, MD, ScM Professor of Medicine

Elimination of Congenital Syphilis in South Africa Where are we and what needs to be done?

February 3, Division of Dockets Management (HFA 305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm Rockville, MD 20852

Analysis of 3 Algorithms for Syphilis Serodiagnosis and Implications for Clinical Management

Summary Guidelines for the Use of Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Type 2 Serologies

EPIDEMIC OF SYPHILIS

Yolo County Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Trends,

ANNUAL MORBIDITY REPORT

Annual Epidemiological Report

Syphilis in the 21 st Century: Sex, Sores, Science, and Surveillance. Syphilis in Men

12/1/2014 GLOBAL HEALTH CASE STUDY RACHEL LE HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS ANY IDEAS? Location: Vadodara, India Gender: female

Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, and Syphilis in Alaska

SYPHILIS (REPORTABLE)

26. Screening for Syphilis

Syphilis among MSM: Clinical Care and Public Health Reporting

Practice Steps for Implementation of Guidelines Recommendations The guideline recommendations are shown schematically -

1. Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of

CHLAMYDIA, GONORRHEA & SYPHILIS: STDS ON THE RISE

6/11/15. BACTERIAL STDs IN A POST- HIV WORLD. Learning Objectives. How big a problem are STIs in the U.S.?

STDs in HIV Clinical Care: New Guidelines on Treatment and Prevention

Sexually Transmitted Infections In Manitoba

Trends in STDs: US Perspective. Michael Towns, M.D. WW Vice President, Medical Affairs BD Diagnostic Systems

STDs among Men who Have Sex with Men (MSM), San Francisco

Diagnosis and Management of Acute HIV

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2018) 7(8):

BMJ Open. Comparison of the automated rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test versus the conventional RPR card test in syphilis testing

Annals of Internal Medicine. 1991;114:

Lymphogranuloma Venereum (LGV) Surveillance Project

Women s Sexual Health: STI and HIV Screening. Barbara E. Wilgus, MSN, CRNP STD/HIV Prevention Training Center at Johns Hopkins

Screening for Syphilis Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

The Resurgence of Syphilis in British Columbia: Who is affected? What are the challenges? How can we improve our response?

Frequent Screening for Syphilis as Part of HIV Monitoring Increases the Detection of Early Asymptomatic Syphilis Among HIV-Positive Homosexual Men

MSM&TGpopulations. Management in. Sex. Sex. Outline. STIs/HIV. Sex. Sexual fluidity and HIV. Risk behavior. Recreational drugs

Profile of Syphilis. By Karley Delahoussaye

Treponema-Specific Tests for Serodiagnosis of Syphilis: Comparative Evaluation of Seven Assays

LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES

Medical Bacteriology Lecture 11

Management of infants at risk of congenital syphilis

S403- Update on STIs for the Generalists

Edward W. Hook, III, M.D.

Dr. R. Someshwaran, MBBS, MD., Assistant professor, Dept. of Microbiology, KFMS&R

Trends in Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) C. Junda Woo, MD, MPH, Medical Director San Antonio Metropolitan Health District June 3, 2017

Why is syphilis important? Treponema pallidum. Attributions. Much Ado About Syphilis

Interpreting Syphilis Serology

Syphilis, caused by the spirochetal bacterium Treponema pallidum

GAY MEN/MSM AND STD S IN NJ: TAKE BETTER CARE OF YOUR PATIENTS! STEVEN DUNAGAN SPECIAL PROJECTS COORDINATOR NJ DOH STD PROGRAM SEPTEMBER 27, 2016

Transcription:

Use of Treponemal Immunoassays for Screening and Diagnosis of Syphilis Guidance for Medical Providers and Laboratories in California These guidelines were developed by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Control Branch in conjunction with the California STD Controllers Association and the California Prevention Training Center (CAPTC) February 2016

Table of Contents Summary Recommendations... 1 I. Introduction... 3 II. Syphilis Testing in California... 3 III. Laboratory Procedures and Reporting... 3 IV. For Providers: Interpretation of Treponemal Immunoassay Serology... 4 V. Congenital Syphilis... 10 VI. Integration of HIV and Other STD Testing... 10 VII. Partner Management... 10 VIII. Serologic Follow-Up... 11 IX. Public Health Reporting... 11 X. Clinical Consultation... 12 XI. References... 12 Attachment A: California Algorithm for Syphilis Screening with Treponemal Immunoassays DISCLAIMER FOR PUBLIC HEALTH CLINICAL GUIDELINES These guidelines are intended to be used as an educational aid to help clinicians make informed decisions about patient care. The ultimate judgment regarding clinical management should be made by the health care provider in consultation with their patient, in light of clinical data presented by the patient and the diagnostic and treatment options available. Further, these guidelines are not intended to be regulatory and not intended to be used as the basis for any disciplinary action against the health care provider.

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS LABORATORIES Laboratories should reflex test all enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA)-positive specimens with a quantitative nontreponemal test (e.g., rapid plasma reagin (RPR) or Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL)). Results of both tests should be reported to providers and to local health departments to facilitate interpretation. If the EIA/CIA is positive and the nontreponemal test is negative (e.g., EIA-positive, RPR-negative), a reflex second treponemal test should be performed. The Treponema pallidum-particle agglutination assay (TP-PA) is preferred. Laboratories should report results from the complete panel of tests (e.g., EIA, RPR, and TP-PA), following laboratory reporting procedures specified by the local health department. MEDICAL PROVIDERS Interpretation of EIA/CIA serology and management recommendations Considerations for serology interpretation in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients as well as in high-risk populations and pregnant women can be found in Tables 1-5. Integration of HIV and other STD testing All patients diagnosed with should be tested for HIV and other STDs. Partner Management For patients with positive EIA serology diagnosed with, the following partner management guidelines apply according to the patient s stage of disease: o Primary and secondary : all sexual partners within the past 3 months should receive evaluation and empiric treatment. o Early latent : all sexual partners in the past 12 months should receive evaluation and treatment, as indicated. o Late latent : long-term sex partners should receive clinical and serologic evaluation. Long-term partners who are serologically negative do not need to receive presumptive treatment for. Public Health Reporting Providers are required by law to report all suspected or confirmed cases of to the local health department where the patient resides within one working day. Providers should inform patients that they may be contacted by local health department representatives for an interview and partner services. 1

MEDICAL PROVIDERS (continued) Serologic Follow-up Patients with EIA/CIA-positive, RPR/VDRL-positive serology diagnosed with a new infection should be treated and receive follow-up titers according to national guidelines. For asymptomatic patients with discordant serology (EIA/CIA-positive, RPR/VDRLnegative) who are treated for, consider repeating serologic screening in 12 months or sooner if indicated by risk. CLINICAL CONSULTATION For questions about management of patients with positive EIA/CIA serology results, call the STD Control Branch at 510-620-3400 and ask to speak to the clinician on call. ACRONYMS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT CDC: CIA: EIA: FTA-ABS: MSM: RPR: TP-PA: VDRL: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention chemiluminescence immunoassay enzyme immunoassay fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption test men who have sex with men rapid plasma reagin Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay Venereal Disease Research Laboratory 2

I. INTRODUCTION In the past decade, laboratories throughout California have increasingly employed automated treponemal enzyme immunoassays (EIA) or chemiluminescence assays (CIA) as the initial screening tests for. This guidance provides screening algorithms based on initial testing with the EIA/CIA; gives recommendations for management of patients with EIA/CIA-positive serology in order to assist clinicians and laboratorians; and addresses management of special populations, including pregnant women and HIV-infected individuals. Further guidance on reporting procedures for clinicians and public health follow-up related to EIA/CIA testing will also be addressed. II. SYPHILIS TESTING IN CALIFORNIA According to the California Clinical Laboratory Survey, from 2000 to 2012, the number of EIA/CIA tests reported by California laboratories increased from zero to nearly 500,000. EIA/CIA tests accounted for 20 percent of the 2.5 million tests ordered in 2012. These trends reflect the steady adoption of screening and testing algorithms involving initial use of EIA/CIA. During the same time period the use of the RPR declined, but still comprised 65 percent of all tests ordered. 1 III. LABORATORY PROCEDURES AND REPORTING Laboratories utilizing EIA or CIA treponemal tests should reflex all specimens with positive EIA/CIA results to a quantitative nontreponemal test (i.e., RPR, VDRL). If the EIA/CIA is positive and the nontreponemal test is also positive, the laboratory should report both results to the provider and the local health department within one working day of the nontreponemal test result, as required by law. A quantitative nontreponemal test and titer should be performed to facilitate future clinical management. If the EIA/CIA is positive and the nontreponemal test is negative (discordant results), a reflex second treponemal test should be performed. Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TP-PA) is preferred as a reflex second treponemal test over the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed test (FTA-ABS). To improve communication with providers and ensure ease of interpretation, laboratories should report the results from the complete panel of tests (e.g., EIA, RPR, and TP-PA), following laboratory reporting procedures specified by the local health department. 3

IV. FOR PROVIDERS: INTERPRETATION OF TREPONEMAL EIA/CIA SEROLOGY RESULTS Clinicians are faced with a significant diagnostic challenge when the initial EIA/CIA testing is positive but subsequent RPR/VDRL testing is negative (discordant serology). It may be challenging to determine whether these test results represent cases of prior treated, early or latent, or false positive screening tests. Notably, treponemal tests such as EIA/CIA often remain positive for life, even when a patient has been adequately treated. Though a second treponemal test (TP-PA) can be helpful in resolving discrepancies, some laboratories do not routinely perform this test. 2 For patients determined to have new or treatment failure, refer to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) STD Treatment Guidelines at www.cdc.gov/std for treatment and follow-up recommendations. Considerations for interpretation of EIA results in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients can be found in Tables 1 and 2. Considerations for interpretation of discordant serology in special populations including 1) high-risk populations, such as gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM); 2) low risk populations, such as geriatric populations; and 3) pregnant women can be found in Tables 3, 4, and 5, respectively. 4

Table 1: Interpretation of treponemal EIA/CIA results in symptomatic patients (e.g., genital ulcer or rash) Assess for prior history/treatment for, perform sexual risk assessment, and conduct physical exam (i.e., skin, oral, anogenital, ocular, neurologic). If high-risk (e.g., MSM, HIV-infected, sexual contacts to ) with symptoms suggestive of primary/secondary, treat presumptively at the time of presentation prior to serology results. EIA or RPR or TP-PA or Possible Recommended Actions CIA VDRL FTA/ABS* Interpretations Positive Positive Not done or Positive or Probable early Positive Positive Probable early Positive Not done or Not done or Not done or negative Possible early alternative diagnosis Syphilis unlikely Treat for appropriate stage of (primary or secondary). Obtain quantitative RPR/VDRL on the day of treatment and at recommended intervals to monitor response. Consult www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/ for recommendations re: treatment and follow-up serology. Treat for appropriate stage of (primary or secondary). Obtain quantitative RPR/VDRL on the day of treatment. If RPR/VDRL negative, repeat in 2-4 weeks to see if seroconversion occurred. Reassess patient. If alternate diagnosis favored or confirmed by laboratory testing, no further action necessary. If clinical suspicion for persists, treat for appropriate stage of. If treatment given, obtain quantitative RPR/VDRL on the day of treatment. If RPR/VDRL negative, repeat in 2-4 weeks to see if seroconversion occurred. No further action necessary. Abbreviations: EIA-enzyme immunoassay; CIA-chemiluminescence immunoassay; RPR-rapid plasma reagin; VDRL- Venereal Disease Research Laboratory; TP-PA-Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay; MSM-men who have sex with men. * If TP-PA not available, FTA-ABS (fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption test) may be used, but sensitivity and specificity are lower than that of TP-PA. Likelihood of interpretation depends on patient s risk factors for and past medical history. Prepared by the California Department of Public Health 5

Table 2: Interpretation of treponemal EIA/CIA results in asymptomatic patients (routine screening) Assess for prior history/treatment for, perform sexual risk assessment, and conduct physical exam (i.e., skin, oral, anogenital, ocular, neurologic). EIA or RPR or TP-PA or Possible Recommended Actions CIA VDRL FTA/ABS * Interpretations Positive Positive Not done or Positive or Latent Positive Positive Latent Positive Latent Positive Not done Latent Not done or Not done or negative Syphilis unlikely If previously untreated, treat for appropriate stage of. If treatment given, obtain quantitative RPR/VDRL on the day of treatment and at recommended intervals to monitor response. If previously treated and sustained 4-fold increase in titer, manage as treatment failure versus re-infection. If previously treated with recommended therapy and 4-fold decrease in titer, no further action necessary. Consult www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/ for recommendations re: treatment and follow-up serology. If previously untreated, treat for appropriate stage of. If treatment given because incubating suspected, obtain quantitative RPR/VDRL on the day of treatment. If RPR/VDRL negative, repeat in 2-4 weeks to see if seroconversion occurred. If previously treated, negative clinical exam, and no recent risk of exposure, no further action necessary. If previously untreated and patient at risk for, repeat testing in 2-4 weeks. If RPR/VDRL and TP- PA still negative, no further action necessary. If previously treated, negative clinical exam, and no recent risk of exposure, no further action necessary. If previously untreated and patient low-risk or risk is uncertain, ask laboratory re: send-out procedures to obtain second treponemal test. If previously untreated and patient is high-risk, treat for appropriate stage of. If treatment given because incubating suspected, obtain quantitative RPR/VDRL on the day of treatment. If RPR/VDRL negative, repeat in 2-4 weeks to see if seroconversion occurred. If previously treated, negative clinical exam, and no recent risk of exposure, no further action necessary. No further action necessary. Abbreviations: EIA-enzyme immunoassay; CIA-chemiluminescence immunoassay; RPR-rapid plasma reagin; VDRL- Venereal Disease Research Laboratory; TP-PA-Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay; MSM-men who have sex with men. * If TP-PA not available, FTA-ABS (fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption test) may be used, but sensitivity and specificity are lower than that of TP-PA. Likelihood of interpretation depends on patient s risk factors for and past medical history. Prepared by the California Department of Public Health 6

Table 3: Interpretation of discordant treponemal EIA/CIA results in asymptomatic high-risk populations (e.g., HIV-infected, MSM) Assess for prior history/treatment for, perform sexual risk assessment, and conduct physical exam (i.e., skin, oral, anogenital, ocular, neurologic). If any signs or symptoms of, see Table 1 for management. EIA or RPR or TP-PA or Possible Recommended Actions CIA VDRL FTA/ABS* Interpretations Positive Positive Latent If previously untreated, treat for appropriate stage of. If treatment given because incubating suspected, obtain quantitative RPR/VDRL on the day of treatment. If RPR/VDRL negative, repeat in 2-4 weeks to see if seroconversion occurred. If previously treated, negative clinical exam, and no recent risk of exposure, no further action necessary. If HIV-infected and staged as having late latent, evaluate for symptoms of neuro. Those with neurologic symptoms should undergo immediate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination. CSF examination is not needed routinely unless symptoms/signs are present. Positive Latent Positive Not done Latent If previously untreated and at risk for, either repeat testing in 2-4 weeks or consider treatment for appropriate stage of. If repeat testing chosen and RPR/VDRL and TP- PA still negative, no further action necessary. If treatment given because incubating suspected, obtain quantitative RPR/VDRL on the day of treatment. If RPR/VDRL negative, repeat in 2-4 weeks to see if seroconversion occurred. If previously treated, negative clinical exam, and no recent risk of exposure, no further action necessary. If previously untreated and at risk for, either repeat testing in 2-4 weeks or consider treatment for appropriate stage of. If repeat testing chosen and RPR/VDRL still negative, no further action necessary. If treatment given because incubating suspected, obtain quantitative RPR/VDRL on the day of treatment. If RPR/VDRL negative, repeat in 2-4 weeks to see if seroconversion occurred. If previously treated, negative clinical exam, and no recent risk of exposure, no further action necessary. Abbreviations: EIA-enzyme immunoassay; CIA-chemiluminescence immunoassay; RPR-rapid plasma reagin; VDRL- Venereal Disease Research Laboratory; TP-PA-Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay; MSM-men who have sex with men. * If TP-PA not available, FTA-ABS (fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption test) may be used, but sensitivity and specificity are lower than that of TP-PA. Likelihood of interpretation depends on patient s risk factors for and past medical history. Prepared by the California Department of Public Health 7

Table 4: Interpretation of discordant treponemal EIA/CIA results in low-risk populations (e.g., dementia in geriatric populations, non-specific neurologic symptoms in the general population) Assess for prior history/treatment for, perform sexual risk assessment, and conduct physical exam (e.g., skin, oral, anogenital, ocular, neurologic). If any signs or symptoms of, see Table 1 for management. EIA or RPR or TP-PA or Possible Recommended Actions CIA VDRL FTA-ABS* Interpretations Positive Positive Latent If previously untreated, treat for appropriate stage of. If previously treated, negative clinical exam, and no recent risk of exposure, no further action necessary. Unlikely early For geriatric patients with dementia, cerebrospinal (incubating) fluid evaluation is not universally recommended and should be performed only if provider is suspicious for neuro. Positive Latent Unlikely early (incubating) Positive Not done Latent Unlikely early (incubating) In low risk populations, isolated positive EIA/CIA are likely to be false positives. If previously treated, negative clinical exam, and no recent risk of exposure, no further action necessary. If previously untreated, consider repeat serology in 2-4 weeks. If both RPR and TP-PA remain negative, no further action necessary. In low risk populations, isolated positive EIA/CIA are likely to be false positives. If previously treated, negative clinical exam, and no recent risk of exposure, no further action necessary. If previously untreated, either ask laboratory re: send-out procedures to obtain second treponemal test or consider repeat serology in 2-4 weeks. If both RPR and second treponemal test remain negative, no further action necessary. Abbreviations: EIA-enzyme immunoassay; CIA-chemiluminescence immunoassay; RPR-rapid plasma reagin; VDRL- Venereal Disease Research Laboratory; TP-PA-Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay; MSM-men who have sex with men. * If TP-PA not available, FTA-ABS (fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption test) may be used, but sensitivity and specificity are lower than that of TP-PA. Likelihood of interpretation depends on patient s risk factors for and past medical history. Prepared by the California Department of Public Health 8

Table 5: Interpretation of discordant treponemal EIA/CIA results in asymptomatic pregnant women Initial evaluation of all pregnant women with discordant serology should include obtaining a history of prior diagnosis and treatment, sexual risk assessment, and physical exam (i.e., skin, oral, anogenital, ocular, neurologic). If any signs or symptoms of, see Table 1 for management. All pregnant women at high risk for or who live in areas of high morbidity should receive screening during the first trimester, third trimester (~28 weeks gestation), and at delivery. EIA or RPR or TP-PA or Possible Recommended Actions CIA VDRL FTA-ABS* Interpretations Positive Positive Latent (treated or untreated) If previously untreated, treat for appropriate stage of. If treatment given, obtain RPR/VDRL on day of treatment. If RPR/VDRL negative, repeat RPR/VDRL at 28-32 weeks gestation. If RPR/VDRL positive, then consult www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/ for recommendations re: treatment and follow-up serology. If previously treated, negative clinical exam, and no recent risk of exposure, repeat RPR/VDRL at 28-32 weeks gestation. Positive Latent (treated or untreated) Positive Not done Latent Not done or Not done or negative (treated or untreated) Syphilis unlikely In low risk pregnant women, isolated positive EIA/CIA are likely to be false positives. If previously untreated, repeat testing in 2-4 weeks. If RPR/VDRL and TP-PA still negative, no further action necessary. If previously treated, negative clinical exam, and no recent risk of exposure, repeat RPR/VDRL at 28-32 weeks gestation. In low risk pregnant women, isolated positive EIA/CIA are likely to be false positives. Ask laboratory re: send-out procedures to obtain second treponemal test (preferred). If second treponemal test cannot be obtained, repeat testing in 2-4 weeks. If RPR/VDRL still negative, no treatment needed. Repeat RPR/VDRL at 28-32 weeks gestation. If previously treated, negative clinical exam, and no recent risk of exposure, repeat RPR/VDRL at 28-32 weeks. No further action necessary. Abbreviations: EIA-enzyme immunoassay; CIA-chemiluminescence immunoassay; RPR-rapid plasma reagin; VDRL- Venereal Disease Research Laboratory; TP-PA-Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay; MSM-men who have sex with men. * If TP-PA not available, FTA-ABS (fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption test) may be used, but sensitivity and specificity are lower than that of TP-PA. Likelihood of interpretation depends on patient s risk factors for and past medical history. Prepared by the California Department of Public Health 9

V. CONGENITAL SYPHILIS In pregnant women without risk factors for, an isolated positive EIA (EIA+/RPR-/TP-PA-) is likely to be a false positive result. 4 The predictive value of a positive EIA (the chance that a positive EIA truly represents disease) is reduced in low-risk populations. If a pregnant woman with discordant serology (EIA+/RPR-) remains RPR/VDRL negative throughout pregnancy, then the newborn should receive an RPR/VDRL at birth, but does not require a comprehensive laboratory and radiologic evaluation. If the mother becomes RPR-positive during pregnancy, the infant will need to be evaluated and possibly treated depending on the gestational age at diagnosis. Recommendations for evaluation/treatment of infants with congenital can be found at http://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/congenital.htm. Due to transplacental passage of maternal treponemal antibodies, EIA/CIA are NOT recommended for diagnosis of congenital in the neonate. Nontreponemal tests (RPR and VDRL) continue to be recommended for neonatal diagnosis. Diagnostic recommendations and interpretation of neonatal nontreponemal titers can be found in the 2015 CDC STD Treatment Guidelines: http://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/congenital.htm. VI. INTEGRATION OF HIV AND OTHER STD TESTING All patients diagnosed with should be offered testing for HIV, as can increase the risk of HIV acquisition and transmission. Rates of HIV co-infection in -infected MSM are almost 50 percent. 5 Women diagnosed with should receive screening for other STDs including gonorrhea and chlamydia. MSM who are diagnosed with should receive site-specific screening for gonorrhea and chlamydia, depending on sexual exposure (urine, oropharynx for receptive oral sex, rectum for receptive anal sex). VII. PARTNER MANAGEMENT Partner management for patients diagnosed with positive EIA/CIA serology will depend largely on staging evaluation of the index patient. Staging is based on the patient s current signs/symptoms, prior history of treatment, sexual risk assessment, and serologic test results and must be made on a case-by-case basis. According to current national guidelines, partner management recommendations vary according to the patient s stage of disease (see Table 6). 3 10

Table 6. Partner Management Recommendations Syphilis Stage Primary and secondary Early latent Latent of unknown duration and RPR/VDRL 1:32 Late latent Partner Management Recommended All sexual partners within the past 3 months should receive evaluation and empiric treatment. All sexual partners within the past 12 months should receive evaluation and treatment, as indicated. Manage the same as early latent. Long-term sex partners should receive clinical and serologic evaluation. Long-term partners who are serologically negative do not need to receive presumptive treatment for. VIII. SEROLOGIC FOLLOW-UP Patients with EIA/CIA-positive, RPR/VDRL-positive serology diagnosed with should receive follow-up nontreponemal titers according to national guidelines. Guidelines for serologic follow-up are available from the CDC at: http://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/.htm. For asymptomatic patients with discordant serology (EIA/CIA-positive, RPR/VDRLnegative) who are treated for, consider repeating serologic screening in 12 months or sooner if indicated by risk. IX. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTING Because complete case reporting is essential to maintain the accuracy and quality of surveillance systems, the following are recommendations to providers for reporting cases diagnosed using the EIA/CIA-based algorithms: Providers are required by law to report suspected or confirmed cases of to the local health jurisdiction where the patient resides (Title 17, California Code of Regulations, 2500) within one working day of identification. Providers should follow the local health department s specified procedures for reporting, including providing the patient s name, address, other demographic information, ordering provider address, and likely stage of (i.e., primary, secondary, early latent, late latent). In clinical situations in which there is evidence of treatment failure or repeat infection (i.e., 4-fold increase in quantitative nontreponemal titer), then the case should be reported as such. 11

Providers are required to report new cases of, but do not need to report follow-up serology results for patients who have been previously treated and reported. Providers who receive positive test results for a patient whose treatment history is not known should report these patients as possible cases. X. CLINICAL CONSULTATION Medical providers and public health professionals in California with questions about management of patients with positive or discordant EIA/CIA serology results may submit a consult to the STD Control Branch and California Prevention Training Center at www.stdccn.org or call 510-620-3400 to consult with the clinician on call. XI. REFERENCES 1. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Testing in California, 2012 Clinical Laboratory Survey. California Department of Public Health, STD Control Branch. Online: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/statistics/pages/stddata.aspx. Accessed February 2016. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Discordant results from reverse sequence screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(5):133-137. 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2015. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015; 64(RR 3); 1-137. 4. Mmeje O, Chow JM, Davidson L, Shieh J, Schapiro JM, Park IU. Discordant Syphilis Immunoassays in Pregnancy: Perinatal Outcomes and Implications for Clinical Management. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 1;61(7):1049-53. 5. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Data: California Department of Public Health, STD Control Branch; 2014. Available at: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/statistics/pages/stddata.aspx. Accessed February 2016. 12

Attachment A: California Algorithm for Syphilis Screening with Treponemal Immunoassays* Treponemal Test (e.g., EIA or CIA) Not Syphilis Positive Quantitative Nontreponemal Test (e.g., RPR or VDRL) Positive Syphilis (new or prior infection ) 2 nd Treponemal Test (TP-PA preferred ) Positive Possible interpretations 1) 2) Latent 3) Early Possible interpretations 1) 2) Incubating Abbreviations: EIA-enzyme immunoassay; CIA-chemiluminescence immunoassay; RPR-rapid plasma reagin; VDRL-Venereal Disease Research Laboratory; TP-PA-Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay. * Recommended algorithm. Algorithm used by local laboratory may vary. Check with your local laboratory director. Results may be positive for prior regardless of whether infection was initially treated or untreated. If TP-PA not available, FTA-ABS (fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption test) may be used, but sensitivity and specificity are lower than that of TP-PA. Please see Tables 1-5 of this document for specific guidance based on interpretation of test results. Prepared by the California Department of Public Health 13