EffPac - Trial: Assessment of the Effectiveness of DCB versus POBA in the SFA Ulf Teichgräber, MD, MBA

Similar documents
Department of Radiology. EffPac - Trial:

NCT Teichgräber et al. Trials (2016) DOI /s x

EffPac RCT: final 6-month results with the Luminor DCB

Best DCB outcomes in SFA TASC A&B lesions: EFFPAC-RCT 12-months follow-up

EffPac-Trial CoreLab Dr. Ulrich Beschorner, corelab Bad Krozingen GmbH, Germany Data Management and Safety Board (DMSB) Dr. Michael Werk, Martin Luthe

Luminor DCB in femoropopliteal lesions

The latest generation DEB

COMPARE-Pilot RCT: 1-year results of a randomised comparison of RANGER DCB vs. IN.PACT DCB in complex SFA lesions. Dierk Scheinert

Dierk Scheinert, MD. Department of Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany

The role of photoablation and DCB for in-stent restenosis

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

XPEDITE Clinical Study PaclitaXel-coated Peripheral StEnts used In the Treatment of FemoropoplitEal Stenoses

Real PTX RCT: 3 year data from a randomized comparison of DCB vs. DES in femoropopliteal lesions

RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis. Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

The LIMBO trial: a RCT investigating adventitial dexamethasone infusion to prevent restenosis in BTK arteries utilizing a novel angiographic endpoint

6-month 0utcomes of a Novel Sirolimus Coated DCB Technology Evaluated in SFA Thomas Zeller, MD University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

The Illumina FIH study with a next generation DES 12-months results

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

Endovascular Therapy vs. Open Femoral Endarterectomy Rationale and Design of the Randomized PESTO Trial

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC on behalf of KANSHAS 1 investigators; Tepe G, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Deloose K, Verbist J, Goverde P, Zeller T

BIOFLEX PEACE Registry

ISR-treatment The Leipzig experience with purely mechanical debulking. Sven Bräunlich Department for Angiology University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

Six Month Results of the Global BIOLUX P-III All-Comers Registry using Drug Coated Balloon in Infra-Inguinal Artery Disease

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty. Thomas Zeller MD Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg & Bad Krozingen, Germany

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions

Lutonix DCB in BTK Update on the BTK real world registry and RCT

Novel concept for drug delivery in infrapopliteal arteries The LIMBO trial

Contemporary use of DCBs, Ranger clinical trial and investigator sponsored research

ILLUMENATE FIH Direct DCB Cohort 12-Month Results

Rotarex mechanical debulking: The Leipzig experience in patients

The Lutonix BTK Clinical Trial Programme: Status Update and Real World Clinical Experience

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

Alternative concepts for drug delivery in BTK arteries the LIMBO project

The Role of Lithotripsy in Solving the Challenges of Vascular Calcium. Thomas Zeller, MD

January 23, Vascular and oncological interventional radiology Paris Descartes University

Disclosures. In the DCB Era, How Do I Choose To Use a Stent? When to Stent and What Devices to Use in the SFA

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

Making BTK Interventions more Durable: Are DES and DCB the answer? Thomas Zeller, MD

Clinical use and safety of the Lutonix DCB for the treatment of BTK: interim data from a prospective registry

First time data release: Initial experience with the temporary Spur Stent System: DEEPER Trial first-in-man results Jihad A. Mustapha, MD, FACC,

Fabrizio Fanelli, MD, EBIR Director Vascular and Interventional Radiology Department "Careggi " University Hospital Florence - Italy

Future Algorithm for Lower Extremity Revascularization: Where Does Vessel Prep Fit?

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

MICHAEL R. JAFF, DO MASSACHUSETTS, UNITED STATES. Medtronic Further. Together

BioMimics 3D in my Clinical Practice

Preliminary 12 Months results of the RAPID trial

Koen Keirse, MD RZ Tienen, Belgium

The Freeway Stent Study: the 12 Months results highly favor the use of DEB in combination with stenting

2 Year Results from the MDT SFA Japan Trial - DCB vs. standard PTA for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA/PPA

The Crack and Pave technique for highly resistant calcified lesions. Manuela Matschuck MD University Hospital Leipzig Department Angiology

TOBA Trial 12 months Results

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

DCB in my practice: How the evidence influences my strategy. Yang-Jin Park

Outcome of DCB and PTA post stenting in occluded versus stenotic lesions subgroup analysis of the randomized Freeway Stent Study

LUTONIX DCB in BTK Update on the BTK clinical program & single center experience

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg, MD, FESC Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster. Dierk Scheinert, M.D. Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

Atherectomy: Jetstream and Directional. George S. Chrysant, M.D.

Massimiliano Fusaro, MD on behalf of ISAR-STATH Investigators. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München Munich - Germany

Update on Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) Below the Knee. Marianne Brodmann, MD Medical University Graz Graz, Austria

LIFESTREAM TM First look at the BOLSTER 2-year follow up data

Surgical Bypass vs. Zilver PTX stent for long SFA lesions : Interim results of the ZilverPass Trial

Long-term results with interwoven nitinol stents vs. BMS vs. DCB

New approaches for drug delivery in BTK arteries

2-YEAR DATA SUPERA POPLITEAL REAL WORLD

Is combination therapy with directional atherectomy followed by DCB the answer to challenges in treating SFA disease?

Efficacy of DEB in Calcification and Subintimal Angioplasty

Is a Stent or Scaffold Necessary in The SFA?

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

DCB level 1 evidence review

Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment

THE SCIENCE BEHIND DRUG COATED BALLOONS OUTCOMES

Comparison Of Primary Long Stenting Versus Primary Short Stenting For Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease (PARADE)

Preliminary 6-month results of VMI-CFA trial

Angiographic dissection pattern and patency outcomes of post balloon angioplasty for SFA lesions -a retrospective multi center analysis-

DISRUPT PAD. (( Data Summary )) DISRUPT PAD Data Summary SPL Rev. B 2016 Shockwave Medical Inc. All rights reserved.

Drug- Coated Balloons for the SFA: Overview of Technology and Results

Pulsar stent technology

Study of a Balloon-Expandable Covered Stent for Obstructive Lesions in the Iliac Artery

The BATTLE Trial Comparing Bare Metal to Drug Eluting Stents for Intermediate Length Lesions of the SFA

Dealing with Calcification in BTK Arteries: Is Lithoplasty the Answer?

Evolving Role of Drug-Eluting Stents In Complex SFA - Majestic Trial Data

Transcription:

EffPac - Trial: Assessment of the Effectiveness of DCB versus POBA in the SFA Ulf Teichgräber, MD, MBA Leipzig, 24.01.2017 Prof. Dr. Ulf Teichgräber - LINC 2017 2

Disclosure of conflict of interest Speaker name: Ulf Teichgräber, MD, MBA Potential conflicts of interest related to the presentation: o Research grant: ivascular, Endoscout Potential conflicts of interest not related to the presentation: o o Consulting Fees, Honoraria, Research Grants, Advisory Boards: ab medica, Abbott Vascular, B.Braun Melsungen, Boston Scientific, Celonova, C.R. Bard, COOK, Endoscout, GE Healthcare, ivascular, Kimal, Maquet, Medtronic, Philips Healthcare, Siemens Heathcare, Spectranetics, W.L.Gore Master research agreements with Siemens Healthcare, GE Healthcare Leipzig, 24.01.2017 Prof. Dr. Ulf Teichgräber - LINC 2017 3

Paclitaxel-coated Balloon Luminor35 * Dosage of uniform diameter nanodrops by direct ultrasonic deposition Control over drug morphology Ultrathin multilayer coating: - DURABILITY - Minimum drug loss Homogeneous distribution of drug - Accurate dosage SEM: magnify: x250 SEM: magnify: x 1000 MICROCRISTALLINE paclitaxel * Luminor 35 Paclitaxel Eluting Peripheral Balloon Dilatation Catheter marked in European Union since 2013. (ivascular, S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) 4

Paclitaxel-coated Balloon Different Coating Technology MICROCRISTALLINE paclitaxel TRANSFERTECH Efficacy Safety FAST drug TRANSFER MINIMUM drug LOSS Leipzig, 24.01.2017 Prof. Dr. Ulf Teichgräber - LINC 2017 5

EffPac-trial Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-coated Luminor Balloon Catheter versus Uncoated Balloon Catheter in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries to Prevent Vessel Restenosis or Reocclusion Leipzig, 24.01.2017 Prof. Dr. Ulf Teichgräber - LINC 2017 6

EffPac-trial Design: Investigator-initiated, prospective, multi-centre trial and 2 arms randomised study Objective Safety and efficacy of the Luminor paclitaxel drug eluting balloon in inhibiting restenosis and in ensuring long term patency Sponsor: University of Jena, Germany Representative of the sponsor: Prof. Dr. Ulf Teichgräber, Jena University Hospital Leipzig, 24.01.2017 Prof. Dr. Ulf Teichgräber - LINC 2017 7

EffPac-trial CoreLab Dr. Ulrich Beschorner, corelab Bad Krozingen GmbH, Germany Data Management and Safety Board (DMSB) Dr. Michael Werk, Martin Luther Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany Dr. Vicenc Riambau, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Spain Prof. Dr. Wienke, University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany Monitoring and SAE Reporting (VascuScience GmbH) Dr. Christin Ott and Lars Mahler, Leipzig, Germany Project Management Tabitha Heller, Cornelia Eichorn, Nicole Brillinger, Dr. Andrea Rößler, University Jena, Germany Producer of the Investigational Product Life Vascular Devices Biotech, S.L., Barcelona, Spain Leipzig, 24.01.2017 Prof. Dr. Ulf Teichgräber - LINC 2017 8

EffPac-trial 11 Participating Sites 01 Jena PD Dr. R. Aschenbach, Univ. Hosp. Jena 02 Leipzig Prof. Dr. Dierk Scheinert, Univ. Hosp. Leipzig 03 Bad Krozingen Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller, Heart Center 04 Hamburg Dr. S. Sixt, Angiologikum 05 München PD Dr. M. Treitl, University Hospital 06 Berlin Prof. Dr. K. Brechtel, Ihre Radiologen 07 Sonnebrg Dr. M. Thieme, Medinos Clinic 08 Karlsbad Prof. Dr. E. Blessing, SRH-Clinic 09 Heidelberg Dr. B. Vogel, University Heidelberg 10 Arnsberg Dr. M. Lichtenberg, Clinic Arnsberg 11 Kusel Dr. P. von Flotow, Westpfalz Clinic Leipzig, 24.01.2017 Prof. Dr. Ulf Teichgräber - LINC 2017 9

EFFPac-trial Design Major Inclusion Criteria Age > 18 years Subject must agree to undergo the 6-month angiographic and clinical follow-up (at 12 month post-procedure) Peripheral vascular disease Rutherford class 2-4 De novo stenotic/ re- stenotic lesion or occlusive lesions in the superficial femoral (SFA) and/or popliteal arteries (PA) 70% diameter stenosis or occlusion Target lesion length: 15 cm (TASC II A and B) one patent infrapopliteal run-off artery to the foot Major Exclusion Criteria Severely calcified target lesions in the SFA/PA resistant to PTA Previous intervention or surgery in the target vessel Major amputation in the same limb as the target lesion Acute myocardial infarction within 30 days before intervention Renal insufficiency with a serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dl at baseline Platelet count <50 G/l or >600 G/l at baseline If the index lesion is re-stenotic, the prior PTA must have been >30 days prior to treatment in the current study Leipzig, 24.01.2017 Prof. Dr. Ulf Teichgräber - LINC 2017 10

Study Design Inclusion

Safety Efficacy Trial Design and Endpoints Endpoints Baseline 6 month 12 month Primary Secondary Primary Vessel diameter (mm) Late Lumen Loss (LLL)* Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR/TVR) Patency Change of ABI, Rutherford stage, QoL (WIQ), EQ-5D Major and minor amputation rate at index limb Mortality, independently of cause * LLL = difference between the diameters (in mm) at 6 months follow-up minus post-procedure Leipzig, 24.01.2017 Prof. Dr. Ulf Teichgräber - LINC 2017 12

Study Design 171/172 subjects enrolled Recruitment completed on 31. Dec. 2016 Randomisation 1:1 POBA N=85 Luminor35 N= 86 6 month 6 month FUP FUP N=53 N=51 Leipzig, 24.01.2017 Prof. Dr. Ulf Teichgräber - LINC 2017 13

Baseline Patient Characteristics LUMINOR POBA Age 67.3 ± 10.5 (82) 67.8 ± 8.9 (83) Male 61.0% (50/82) 68.7%(57/83) Rutherford Clinical Category 1 0% (0/82) 1.2% (1/82) 2 18.3% (15/82) 23.2% (19/82) 3 78.1% (64/82) 74.4% (61/82) 4 2.4% (2/82) 1.2% (1/82) 5 1.2% (1/82) 0% (0/82) Diabetes 37.8% (31/82) 41.0% (34/83) Hypertension 86.6% (71/82) 85.5% (71/83) Hyperlipidemia 71.6% (58/81) 68.8% (55/80) Smoking Status never smoked 16.3% (13/80) 16.8% (14/83) previous smoker 45.0% (36/80) 39.8% (33/83) current smoker 38.8% (31/80) 43.4% (36/83) ABI left 0.88 ± 0.26 (65) 0.87 ± 0.27 (69) right 0.83 ± 0.24 (67) 0.86 ± 0.29 (70) Interim analysis of preliminary data

Baseline Angiographic Data LUMINOR POBA Lesion Length (cm) 6.0 ± 4.4 (82) 5.5 ± 4.0 (83) Total Occlusion 20.0% (16/80) 25.3% (21/83) Calcification none/mild 53.1% (43/81) 45.8% (38/83) moderate 43.2% (35/81) 43.4% (36/83) severe 3.7% (3/81) 10.8% (9/83) Diameter Stenosis (%) 87.8 ± 9.8 (82) 90.1 ± 8.9 (83) Reference Vessel Diameter (mm) 5.5 ± 0.6 (80) 5.4 ± 0.7 (83) # of Patent Run-off Vessel 0 0% (0/82) 1.2% (1/83) 1 22.0% (18/82) 21.7% (18/83) 2 40.2% (33/82) 32.5% (27/83) 3 37.8% (31/82) 44.6% (37/83) Target Lesion Location 1 12.1% (12/99) 11.3% (11/97) 2 26.3% (26/99) 25.8% (25/97) 3 34.3% (34/99) 37.1% (36/97) 4 12.1% (12/99) 13.4% (13/97) 5 13.1% (13/99) 9.3% (9/97) 6 2.0% (2/99) 3.1% (3/97) Interim analysis of preliminary data

Procedural Characteristics LUMINOR POBA Pre-dilatation Performed 100% (82/82) 98.8% (82/83) Post-DCB Dissection 36.6% (30/82) 41.0% (34/83) Application of Stents 13.4% (11/82) 18.3% (15/82) Post-procedure Diameter Stenosis 15.8 ± 16.8 (82) 14.9 ± 16.2 (83) Interim analysis of preliminary data

Temporary results Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) 100.0% (9 at risk) 66.1% (9 at risk) Interim analysis of preliminary data

Temporary results Patency 79.8% (9 at risk) 56.2% (9 at risk) Primary patency: Freedom from restenosis (determined by duplex ultrasound PSVR <2.5) and freedom from TLR at 6 months

Trial results @ 6 months follow-up Report of primary endpoint: LLL Leipzig, 24.01.2017 Prof. Dr. Ulf Teichgräber - LINC 2017 19

Jena, Thuringia, Germany Jena

EffPac - Trial: Assessment of the Effectiveness of DCB versus POBA in the SFA Ulf Teichgräber, MD, MBA Leipzig, 24.01.2017 Prof. Dr. Ulf Teichgräber - LINC 2017 21