Mental and Behavioral Health Needs Assessment CONSUMER SURVEY

Similar documents
Consumer Perception Survey (Formerly Known as POQI)

Youth Services Survey for Youth / Families Report - Spring 2014 FSA Deaf Community Counseling Services. Global Satisfaction 100.0%

Santa Barbara County Department of Behavioral Wellness Consumer Perception Survey Report Fall 2015 & Spring 2016

Health Care Callback Survey Topline August 2001

Consumer Perception Survey Report

SUNSET Russian Tobacco Education Project

2016 Youth Services Satisfaction Survey Report

Wisconsin Quality of Life Caregiver Questionnaire Wisconsin Quality of Life Associates University of Wisconsin - Madison.

SCIOTO PAINT VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER. Consumer Satisfaction Survey Report

Impact and Evidence briefing

Awareness and understanding of dementia in New Zealand

YC2 Is Effective in the Following Areas:

Peer Parent Support & Wraparound: Managing the Difference Patricia Miles Brevard Wraparound Conference June 2016

Medicaid Denied My Request for Services, Now What?

take no for an answer? What can you do in those situations? do? If you think you need new friends, where can you find them?

PSYCHOLOGIST-PATIENT SERVICES

UNDERSTANDING GIVING: ACROSS GENERATIONS

Massachusetts Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias Online Training Program 2017

San Francisco Suicide Prevention (SFSP) Client Satisfaction Report July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012 Key Findings and Implementation of Feedback

Georgia Aging and Disability Resource Connection (ADRC) Evaluation Report

IAPT for SMI: Findings from the evaluation of service user experiences. Julie Billsborough & Lisa Couperthwaite, Researchers at the McPin Foundation

Healing, Justice, & Trust

Antibiotic Resistance Knowledge Survey Results: Comparison of the 1999 and 2000 Surveys October 2000

Focus of Today s Presentation. Partners in Healing Model. Partners in Healing: Background. Data Collection Tools. Research Design

New Mexico Behavioral Health Collaborative. New Mexico Behavioral Health Consumer, Family/Caregiver Satisfaction Project

LEARNING TO WORK IT OUT TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction... Lesson Power of Goals & Beliefs... Lesson Power of Thinking and Feeling...

ADULT QUESTIONNAIRE (18-64 years) OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (OMS) [Version 3; December 13, 2014] / / MM DD YYYY

1. Demonstrate how each of the question sets have been applied in a variety of settings and across the clinical pathway:

National NHS patient survey programme Survey of people who use community mental health services 2014

Restorative Justice Pilot Evaluation Preliminary Report. Submitted To: The State Court Administrator s Office

Childcare Provider Satisfaction Survey Report

The Sanctuary Report Executive Summary Report

Healing, Justice, & Trust

Triple P Shasta County

Evidence-Informed Approach to Building Healthy Futures for LGBTQ Children Youth & Young Adults

HCBS Autism Waiver Individualized Behavioral Program/Plan of Care Section I - Demographics

Ohio PREP Region 7 Data Report. Prepared by: Ohio University s Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs January 2018

The Therapist s Craft Advanced Empathy Training. TEAM Therapy. Empathy Training / Burns. Copyright 2013 by David Burns, M.D.

Certified Recovery Peer Specialist Paraprofessional Training

Family & Individual Support Program - Handbook

Family Service Agency Three Year Trend Analysis in Outcomes and Customer Satisfaction

Free Time Boredom. I performed the Free Time Boredom assessment to Linda (fictitious name to

Ohio PREP Region 7: Cuyahoga County Board of Health October 2017 through September 2018 Data Report

East Cleveland Community Perceptions Baseline Survey. Final Report October 2012

Evaluation of Life Skills, a Model Illness Management and Recovery Program. Mona Goldman, Ph.D. and Nancy Mann, RN. Final Report.

Quality Checking the gateway to taking control of our lives Dr THOMAS DOUKAS.

An Evaluation of the Sonas Freedom Programme September- December January 2012 Researcher: Paula McGovern

Study Title: An Organizational Needs Assessment to Enhance Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) in a Direct Service Setting that Addresses Homelessness

Reducing Youth Alcohol Use through Positive Community Norms in Minnesota

ADHD clinic for adults Feedback on services for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Performance Improvement Project Implementation & Submission Tool

COACT Colorado: Trauma Informed System of Care

support support support STAND BY ENCOURAGE AFFIRM STRENGTHEN PROMOTE JOIN IN SOLIDARITY Phase 3 ASSIST of the SASA! Community Mobilization Approach

Next, I m going to ask you to read several statements. After you read each statement, circle the number that best represents how you feel.

Supply of Alcohol to Young People Aged Under 18 Years. June 2017

Adverse childhood experiences, mental illness and the protective effects of resilience in Wales. Karen Hughes, Public Health Wales

Life History Screen. a. Were you raised by someone other than your biologic/birth parents? Yes No

Cost and Consequence: Trying to balance affordability and adherence

Help Seeking: Ubiquitous Barriers Across the Life Span

Continuing Care. Part 3 Telephone Monitoring

Executive Director Position Announcement August, 2018

PATIENT SURVEY FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE ONLY. TO BE COMPLETED BY STUDY COORDINATOR.

Sample Report for Zero Suicide Workforce Survey

Workforce Analysis: Children and Young People s Mental Health and Wellbeing Wider system

Arthritis: The Impact on Daily Life

Summary of the Dental Results from the GP Patient Survey; July to September 2014

Chapter 1. Dysfunctional Behavioral Cycles

Young Person and Family Rated Recovery

PHARMACISTS IN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR

One week program of activities. Aimed at AS-Level Psychology students. Takes place in July, after AS-Level exams

A Report of the Findings from the 2009 Recovery Oriented Systems Indicators (ROSI) Consumer Survey for Dauphin County

Defining principles of Strategic family therapy

The Mosaic Project. Outdoor School Alumni Survey Report Brief. Evaluation Highlights

The Relationship between YouTube Interaction, Depression, and Social Anxiety. By Meredith Johnson

CHAPTER 3 METHOD AND PROCEDURE

Attitudes and Behaviour towards Alcohol Survey 2013/14 to 2015/16: Hawke s Bay Regional Analysis

Horizon Research. Public Trust and Confidence in Charities

Teresa Anderson-Harper

Participant Information Sheet

Tenant & Service User Involvement Strategy

How to Conduct an Unemployment Benefits Hearing

What does research tell us about best practices in evaluating services provided for rape victims?

Service-Learning Student Evaluation Annual Report

Understanding Practice Issues with. Transgender People: Listening to Practitioner and. Client Voices

Allina Health Neighborhood Health Connection

2014 Hong Kong Altruism Index Survey

ENGAGEMENT SUSANNE M. LOGSDON DHS/DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH, REGIONS 1 & 2 IPS TRAINER IPS SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT

Making Connections: Early Detection Hearing and Intervention through the Medical Home Model Podcast Series

Submission - The Substance Addiction Compulsory Assessment and Treatment (SACAT) Bill

Motivational Interviewing

Evaluation of Grief Support Services Survey. Elective Modules and Questions

Caring.com/TENA Incontinence Survey Research Summary Report November 5, 2009

BASIC VOLUME. Elements of Drug Dependence Treatment

Mary s Center. School Based Mental Health Program

Lomond & Argyll Advocacy Service Client Satisfaction Survey

National Wraparound Initiative Webinar Series. Youth in Wraparound. February 22, Tammy Cherry. Placer County Children's System of Care

Patient story. One young person s experience of CAMHS.

6: Service considerations a report from the Adult Dental Health Survey 2009

Wellbeing Measurement Framework for Colleges

SECOND AUSTRALIAN CHILD AND ADOLESCENT SURVEY OF MENTAL HEALTH AND WELLBEING HIGHLIGHTS

Transcription:

Mental and Behavioral Health Needs Assessment CONSUMER SURVEY Prepared for: The Lincy Institute University of Nevada Las Vegas July 21, 2015

1 Executive Summary Mental and Behavioral Health Needs Assessment CONSUMER SURVEY Overview and Background of the Study On behalf Dr. Ramona Denby of the Lincy Institute, and under the project direction and assistance of the Principal Investigator Dr. Sandra Owens, the Cannon Survey Center staff distributed and collected 203 face-to-face, self-administered questionnaires from 34 youth and 169 adults who were active consumers of mental health services in Southern Nevada between the dates of November 17, 2014 and May 26, 2015. The purpose of this study was to survey a subpopulation of Southern Nevada's consumers of mental health services in order to complete a three-part assessment of the mental and behavioral health care services workforce. The other two components of the local workforce needs assessment consisted of: (1) a randomized, general population Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI) with 601 household respondents in 2014, and (2) an emailed and paper-pencil mailed questionnaire completed by 248 mental health practitioners and 53 mental health administrators working in Southern Nevada in 2013. Methodology of the Study This study utilized a quantitative, structured data collection survey instrument. The vast majority of the items in the questionnaire were closed-ended questions. Several open-ended questions were also asked of the respondents in the hopes that this qualitative data would provide information useful for better understanding the scaled ratings and perceptions indicated within the quantitative survey data. The survey instrument was a paper-pencil questionnaire that was completed by youth and adults who were invited to voluntarily participate in the study. The UNLV Institutional Review Board approved the research protocol that was used to include human subjects in this study of consumers of mental and behavioral health services. The final youth questionnaire included 83 items, and the final adult questionnaire included 95 items. Approximately 67 of the items were identical and included within both surveys. The study sample was designed to be a non-randomized, convenience sample consisting of 200+ youth and adults currently receiving mental and behavioral health services from a variety of agencies located in five distinct neighborhoods in the cities of Henderson, Las Vegas, and North Las Vegas, Nevada.

2 Survey Results The 203 study participants are comprised of 169 adults (83.3%) and 34 youth, ages 12 17, (16.7%) living in Southern Nevada, and currently receiving mental and behavioral health and/or substance abuse treatment services from a local agency. Service Access The clear majority of 202 respondents (83.2%) agreed or strongly agreed that mental health and/or substance abuse service providers in Southern Nevada are conveniently located close to their places of residence. An even larger majority (90.1%) of these 202 respondents agreed or strongly agreed that mental health and/or substance abuse treatment services are available at appointment times that are convenient for their schedules. Youth respondents were more likely than adult respondents to strongly disagree that there were services they weren t able to receive. Youth respondents were asked a set of questions about their access to care. Thirty eight percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that at some point in the past that they felt like they needed help, but their parents or caregivers didn t know what to do to help. Similarly, 44.1% agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that they had felt like they needed help but couldn t tell anyone, and 38.2% agree or strongly agreed with the statement that they had felt like they needed help but they didn t know where to turn to for that help. Additionally, 14.7% of these youth respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that they had felt like they needed help but their parents or caregivers encouraged them not to say anything to anyone about needing help. These responses are very troubling in that so many of these youth, who are all currently receiving therapy, have had the past experience of needing mental or behavioral health treatment, and at that time didn t know where to get help and in some cases they felt that their parents/caregivers discouraged their help seeking behaviors. Quality of Care The vast majority of respondents (90.3%; N=195) agreed or strongly agreed that the services they have received in Southern Nevada were of high quality. A slightly larger majority (92.3%; N=195) agreed or strongly agreed that those services were helpful to them. Most respondents (87.5%; N=192) agreed or strongly agreed that they received the right amount of services. A similar proportion (87.7%; N=195) further reported that they agreed or strongly agreed that services received were the right type of services for their needs. Service Satisfaction Nearly all respondents (94.4%; N=196) agreed or strongly agreed that they are satisfied with the services they have received. This more generalized item was elaborated on by a series of questions that show strong support for a number of contributing factors to client satisfaction. The vast majority of respondents indicated agreement or strong agreement that they helped choose

3 their treatment goals (91.2%; N=194), helped to choose their services (86.3%; N=189), felt they participated in their own treatment (91.2%; N=193), that they got the help they wanted (90.1%; N=193), felt they got as much help as they needed (84.8%; N=191), and that they received services that were helpful to them (91.8%; N=194). When respondents needed help, 92.3% (N=194) agreed or strongly agreed that they had a professional to talk to, 87.6% (N=193) agreed or strongly agreed that the location of their mental health services was convenient, and 92.2% (N=193) agreed or strongly agreed that services were available at convenient times for them. Interaction with Staff Nearly all respondents (94.3%; N=193) agreed or strongly agreed that they liked the staff that worked with them. A comparable percentage indicated agreement or strong agreement that the staff knew how to help them (93.7%; N=192), that staff asked them what they wanted or needed (92.2%; 192), that staff listened to what they had to say (94.3%; N=191), that staff respected their wishes about who received information about them (96.3%; N=188), that staff treated them with respect (93.7%; N=190), that staff spoke to them in a way that they could understand (97.4%; N=198), that staff respected their religious beliefs (96.2%; N=185), that staff were sensitive to their cultural or ethnic background (93.1%; N=187), that professionals (caseworkers, therapists) supported them no matter what (93.8%; N=193), and that other staff supported them no matter what (94.8%; N=193). Service Outcomes Survey participants were then asked a series of questions regarding the outcomes of the services they received. Mirroring the satisfaction questions, responses largely indicated agreement with statements of positive outcomes. About nine out of ten respondents (90.6%; N=192) agreed or strongly agreed that they are better at handling daily life. Interpersonal relationships are reported as improved with 84.7% reporting that they get along better with their family and 91.0% indicating that they get along better with friends and other people (agree and strongly agree out of N=189 for each item). Furthermore, 84.1% (N=189) agreed or strongly agreed that they are doing better at school and/or work, 84.6% feel they are better able to cope when things go wrong (agreed or strongly agreed; N=189), 81.3% are satisfied with their family life (agreed or strongly agreed; N=187), 79.7% noted their symptoms are not bothering them as much (agreed or strongly agreed; N=197), 87.3% are better able to do things that they want to do (agreed or strongly agreed; N=197), and 82.9% feel better able to benefit from their prescribed medications (agreed or strongly agreed; N=181). Nearly all respondents (94.9%) indicated that their quality of life is better now that they have received services (agreed or strongly agreed; N=197).

4 Youth respondents were less likely than adults to indicate that they have ever used or are currently using a community health center. Respondents age 18 to 24 and 55 and older were more likely to report that they are currently using a community health center, and were less likely than respondents age 25 to 54 to indicate that they did so more than 3 months ago. The differences between age groups on this item were statistically significant (p <.05). Youth respondents were less likely than older respondents to have utilized a group home or emergency shelter. Respondents age 35 to 44 were more likely than other respondents to be currently using this resource. The differences between age groups on this item were statistically significant (p <.05). Nearly all youth respondents (96.9%; N=32) indicated that they are currently in school; most reported having education at least at middle school level (63.6%), while 39.4% reported being in high school. 1 The majority of youth respondents (57.6%; N=33) lived with biological parents, followed by 15.2% in foster care, 12.1% with adoptive parents, and another 12.1% with relatives (usually specified as grandparents). More than one third (41.9%; N=31) indicated that they had at some point been in foster care. About one in five (21.9%; N=32) reported that they are currently involved with Child Protective Services, and 12.6% (N=32) indicated that they were either currently or had in the past been involved with the juvenile justice system. Youth respondents were asked how many of their therapy sessions in the last three months were attended by a parent or caregiver. More than one in five (22.2%; N=27) indicated that none of the therapy sessions had been attended, while twice that many (44.4%) indicated that one to three of the sessions had been attended, and the remaining 33.3% indicated that either four or more had been attended, or gave a non-numeric response that may or may not fall in the same range. Youth respondents were further asked whether they felt their parent(s) or caregiver(s) should be more or less involved in their therapy. The majority of respondents (65.6%; N=32) felt that involvement was about right, followed by 25% that felt there should be more involvement, and 9.4% that felt there should be less involvement. Youth respondents were asked whether they received wraparound services through Wraparound in Nevada (WIN), to which only 6.5% (N=31) responded affirmatively. Demographics The majority of respondents identified their gender as female (59.9%), followed by 39.1% as male, 0.5% as transgender, and 0.5% as intersex. About one in five respondents were age 25 to 34 (21.9%), 35 to 44 (21.4%), or 45 to 54 (20.8%). Youth respondents made up the next largest age group at 16.7%, followed by those aged 55 years or older (14.1%), and young adults aged 18 to 24 (5.2%).