Transform genomic data into real-life results

Similar documents
NGS ONCOPANELS: FDA S PERSPECTIVE

NGS IN ONCOLOGY: FDA S PERSPECTIVE

GENETIC TESTING FOR TARGETED THERAPY FOR NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC)

Personalised Healthcare (PHC) with Foundation Medicine (FMI) Fatma Elçin KINIKLI, FMI Turkey, Science Leader

Comprehensive genomic profiling for various solid tumors

Regulatory Landscape for Precision Medicine

Personalised cancer care Information for Medical Specialists. A new way to unlock treatment options for your patients

Molecular Testing in Lung Cancer

Clinical Grade Genomic Profiling: The Time Has Come

Learning from the Impact of the Drug-Diagnostics Strategy in Oncology

Next Generation Sequencing in Clinical Practice: Impact on Therapeutic Decision Making

Precision Genetic Testing in Cancer Treatment and Prognosis

Overview of Biomarker Development for Immune PD-1/L1 Checkpoint Blockade

How could molecular profiling impact histology independent labels in the future?

MEDICAL POLICY. SUBJECT: MOLECULAR PANEL TESTING OF CANCERS TO IDENTIFY TARGETED THERAPIES (Excluding NSCLC and CRC) EFFECTIVE DATE: 12/21/17

Diagnostic test Suggested website label Description Hospitals available

Innovation, Uncertainty and Reimbursement Processes in Precision Medicine: The Case of PD-L1

NCCN Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer V Meeting June 15, 2018

Pantoprazole icd 10 code

Matthew Smolkin, MD HCLD Medical Director Molecular Pathology Diagnostic Laboratory

Molecular Testing Updates. Karen Rasmussen, PhD, FACMG Clinical Molecular Genetics Spectrum Medical Group, Pathology Division Portland, Maine

Big data vs. the individual liver from a regulatory perspective

Daniel Lieber, Ph.D. Senior Scientist, Computational Biology Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA. AACR 2017: Clinical Biomarkers April 3, 2017

CDx in oncology Prof. Christophe Le Tourneau, MD, PhD FEAM Geneva September 27, 2018

Personalized Healthcare Update

MET skipping mutation, EGFR

StrandAdvantage Tissue-Specific Cancer Genomic Tests. Empowering Crucial First-Line Therapy Decisions for Your Patient

AVENIO family of NGS oncology assays ctdna and Tumor Tissue Analysis Kits

Dr Yvonne Wallis Consultant Clinical Scientist West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory

MP Circulating Tumor DNA Management of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (Liquid Biopsy)

IntelliGENSM. Integrated Oncology is making next generation sequencing faster and more accessible to the oncology community.

Advances in Pathology and molecular biology of lung cancer. Lukas Bubendorf Pathologie

Liquid biopsy: the experience of real life case studies

SureSelect Cancer All-In-One Custom and Catalog NGS Assays

NGS in tissue and liquid biopsy

Tumor mutational burden and its transition towards the clinic

Corporate Medical Policy

Circulating Tumor DNA in GIST and its Implications on Treatment

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Integration of Cancer Genome into GECCO- Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium

Personalized Genetics

Role of the pathologist in the diagnosis and mutational analysis of lung cancer Professor J R Gosney

EXAMPLE. - Potentially responsive to PI3K/mTOR and MEK combination therapy or mtor/mek and PKC combination therapy. ratio (%)

ACE ImmunoID Biomarker Discovery Solutions ACE ImmunoID Platform for Tumor Immunogenomics

MICROSCOPY PREDICTIVE PROFILING

QIAGEN's Growing Immuno-Oncology Testing Portfolio

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Implementation of nation-wide molecular testing in oncology in the French Health care system : quality assurance issues & challenges

Circulating Tumor DNA for Management of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (Liquid Biopsy)

Case Studies. Ravi Salgia, MD, PhD

ECMC cfdna consensus meeting

QIAGEN Complete Solutions for Liquid Biopsy Molecular Testing

Integration of Genomics Into Clinical Pathways. Precision Medicine and Decision Support

PRECISION INSIGHTS. Liquid GPS. Blood-based tumor profiling and quantitative monitoring. Reveal more with cfdna + cfrna.

NeoTYPE Cancer Profiles

A Blueprint for Drug/Diagnostic Development: Facilitating Development and Use of Curated Genetic Databases

GPS Cancer. The Era of Complete Genomics and Proteomics is Here. Advanced molecular profiling to inform personalized treatment strategies

Select analysis on the next pages. Sample request and sending address see last page. Institut für Pathologie und Molekularpathologie

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling, in record time. Accurate. Clinically Proven. Fast.

Utility of liquid biopsies EQA Program Naples, IT Sidney A. Scudder, MD Director, Clinical Science 13 May, 2017

HSL-Advanced Diagnostics 2018 / 19 Test & Service List

Tissue or Liquid Biopsy? ~For Diagnosis, Monitoring and Early detection of Resistance~

Current and future applications of Molecular Pathology. Kathy Walsh Clinical Scientist NHS Lothian

PRECISION INSIGHTS. GPS Cancer. Molecular Insights You Can Rely On. Tumor-normal sequencing of DNA + RNA expression.

Medical Policy. MP Molecular Analysis for Targeted Therapy of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Personalized Medicine: Lung Biopsy and Tumor

Accel-Amplicon Panels

Giorgio V. Scagliotti Università di Torino Dipartimento di Oncologia

Collaboration between CEQAS and UK NEQAS for Molecular Genetics Solid Tumour EQAs and variant interpretation

Out-Patient Billing CPT Codes

Relevance of Innovative Trial Design Today. Basket of Baskets and other Innovative Clinical Trials

Basket Trials: Features, Examples, and Challenges

Harnessing Complexity: Companion Diagnostics in Oncology

Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment with Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Approval of pembrolizumab (MSI- H/dMMR) and considerations for site-agnostic development of drugs in oncology

Molecular Pathology and Lung Cancer. A. John Iafrate MD-PhD Department of Pathology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA

Supplementary Tables. Supplementary Figures

Whole Genome and Transcriptome Analysis of Anaplastic Meningioma. Patrick Tarpey Cancer Genome Project Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

PLENARY SESSION 1: CLINICAL TRIAL DESIGN IN AN ERA OF HORIZONTAL DRUG DEVELOPMENT Industry Perspective

Patient Leader Education Summit. Precision Medicine: Today and Tomorrow March 31, 2017

Predictive markers for treatment with Immune checkpoint inhibitors - PD-L1 et al -

PCORI RCR FINAL REPORT

Enterprise Interest Thermo Fisher Scientific / Employee

Disclosures Genomic testing in lung cancer

Disclosure of Relevant Financial Relationships NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: 70% PRESENT IN ADVANCED STAGE

Delivering on the Promise of Personalised Healthcare

Molecular Analysis for Targeted Therapy of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

1. Q: What has changed from the draft recommendations posted for public comment in November/December 2011?

Keytruda. Keytruda (pembrolizumab) Description

Quality in Control. ROS1 Analyte Control. Product Codes: HCL022, HCL023 and HCL024

Liquid biopsy in lung cancer: The EGFR paradigm

Immunotherapy in Colorectal cancer

La biopsia liquida dei tumori: il viaggio. Paola Gazzaniga Liquid Biopsy Unit Dept. Molecular Medicine Sapienza University of Rome

LUNG CANCER. pathology & molecular biology. Izidor Kern University Clinic Golnik, Slovenia

Characterisation of structural variation in breast. cancer genomes using paired-end sequencing on. the Illumina Genome Analyser

AVENIO ctdna Analysis Kits The complete NGS liquid biopsy solution EMPOWER YOUR LAB

Evolution of Pathology

The OncoBEAM Platform: The Use of a High Sensitive Technology for Liquid Biopsies in Clinical Practice

5 th July 2016 ACGS Dr Michelle Wood Laboratory Genetics, Cardiff

Transcription:

CLINICAL SUMMARY Transform genomic data into real-life results Biomarker testing and targeted therapies can drive improved outcomes in clinical practice New FDA-Approved Broad Companion Diagnostic for Solid Tumors BRAF Colorectal Cancer EGFR Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer KRAS NRAS ALK BRAF BRCA1 Ovarian Cancer ERBB2 Melanoma BRCA2 Breast Cancer

More comprehensive results than single-marker testing FoundationOne CDx is the first next-generation sequencing (NGS) test with FDA-approval across all solid tumors and clinical validation in multiple indications one test proven concordant with multiple companion diagnostics that helps identify patients who may benefit from associated therapies. The approach used by FoundationOne CDx has been shown by our FoundationOne assay to identify more patients, compared with traditional single-gene testing methods, who test positive for genomic alterations in several cancer types. 1-5 PATIENT DISEASE Lung adenocarcinoma NAME Not Given DATE OF BIRTH Not Given SEX Female MEDICAL RECORD # Not Given PATIENT Jane Sample PHYSICIAN ORDERING PHYSICIAN Not Given MEDICAL FACILITY Not Given ADDITIONAL RECIPIENT Not Given MEDICAL FACILITY ID Not Given PATHOLOGIST Not Given TUMOR TYPE TRF# Lung adenocarcinoma TRFXXXXXX SPECIMEN SPECIMEN SITE Not Given SPECIMEN ID Not Given SPECIMEN TYPE Not Given DATE OF COLLECTION Not Given SPECIMEN RECEIVED Not Given 1 FDA-Approved Therapies List of FDA-approved companion diagnostics to identify patients who may benefit from associated therapies CDx Associated Findings GENOMIC FINDINGS DETECTED EGFR 2 L858R FDA-APPROVED THERAPEUTIC OPTIONS Gilotrif (Afatinib) Iressa (Gefitinib) Tarceva (Erlotinib) OTHER ALTERATIONS & BIOMARKERS IDENTIFIED Results reported in this section are not prescriptive or conclusive for labeled use of any specific therapeutic product. See professional services section for additional information. 1 2 All Other Biomarkers All other biomarkers, including tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI), without companion diagnostic claims Microsatellite Status MS-Stable Tumor Mutation Burden 11 Muts/Mb CDKN2A/B loss EGFR amplification PTCH1 T416S RBM10 Q494* TP53 R267P Refer to appendix for limitation statements related to detection of any copy number alterations, gene rearrangements, MSI or TMB result in this section. Please refer to appendix for Explanation of Clinical Significance Classification and for variants of unknown significance (VUS). SAMPLE REPORT

Genomic testing evolved Clinical Validation and Concordance Studies FoundationOne CDx is concordant with seven on-market companion diagnostics (CDx) BIOMARKER EGFR Exon 19 Deletions and L858R POSITIVE-PERCENT AGREEMENT (PPA)* NEGATIVE-PERCENT AGREEMENT (NPA) COMPARATOR METHOD 98.1% (106/108) 99.4% (153/154) cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 EGFR T790M 98.9% (87/88) 86.1% (93/108) ALK Rearrangements 92.9% (78/84) 100% (75/75) cobas EGFR Mutation Test v1 cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx Assay Vysis ALK Break-Apart FISH Probe Kit KRAS 100% (173/173) 100% (154/154) therascreen KRAS RGQ PCR Kit ERBB2 (HER2) Amplifications 89.4% (101/113) 98.4% (180/183) Dako HER2 FISH PharmDx Kit BRAF V600 BRAF V600E 99.4% (166/167) 99.3% (149/150) 89.6% (121/135) 99.2% (121/122) BRAF V600 dinucleotide 96.3% (26/27) 100% (24/24) THxID BRAF kit cobas BRAF V600 Mutation Test Cobas is a trademark of Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. Therascreen is a trademark of Qiagen. PharmDx is a registered trademark of Dako Denmark A/S. * The reference standard used to calculate PPA and NPA is defined as the consensus calls between the two comparator methods PPA being when FoundationOne CDx and the comparator method(s) identified mutations in mutated patients and NPA being when FoundationOne CDx and the comparator method(s) did not identify mutations in nonmutated patients. Follow-on CDx claims were based on a non-inferiority statistical testing approach using the enrichment design presented by Li M. Statistical Methods for Clinical Validation of Follow-On Companion Diagnostic Devices via an External Concordance Study. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research. Volume 8, 2017 Issue 3: pages 355 363. Sensitivity of dinucleotide detection of BRAF V600K and V600E was found to be significantly reduced in cobas test, in particular for samples in which FoundationOne CDx detected the dinucleotides to be of lower than 40% mutant allele frequency (MAF), leading to low NPA values. A study using the THxID BRAF kit (biomérieux) was conducted with samples with BRAF V600 dinucleotide mutation detected by F1CDx and BRAF V600 negative samples to provide a better evaluation of V600 dinucleotide concordance. FoundationOne CDx is concordant with other next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods FoundationOne CDx is concordant with FoundationOne POSITIVE-PERCENT AGREEMENT (PPA*) NEGATIVE-PERCENT AGREEMENT (NPA*) POSITIVE-PERCENT AGREEMENT (PPA) NEGATIVE-PERCENT AGREEMENT (NPA) All short variants 94.6% 99.9% Substitutions 96.6% 99.9% Indels 83.4% 99.9% The detection of alterations by FoundationOne CDx assay was compared to results of an externally validated NGS assay (evngs). Overall there were 157 overlapping genes between the two assays. The comparison between short alterations, including base substitutions and short indels, detected by F1CDx and the orthogonal method included 188 samples from 46 different tumors. Differences in variants of unknown significance (VUS) alteration calls between the platform were noted, and are expected based on differences in filtering employed by F1CDx and evngs. Negative predictive value and positive predictive value were also calculated and were found to be different than percent agreement because the two platforms filter VUS differently. Discordant alterations not related to VUS filtering were primarily caused by deletions with low allelic fraction in homopolymer regions. The F1CDx variant calling pipeline imposes a filter based on MAF of 0.10 for indels in homopolymer regions to reduce the likelihood of calling false positives resulting from artifacts introduced by the technology. As such, the difference observed was due to varying filter thresholds between the two platforms. *The PPA and NPA were calculated without adjusting for the distribution of samples enrolled using the FoundationOne Laboratory-Developed Test (F1 LDT), therefore these estimates may be biased upward. All variants 98.6% 99.9% All short variants 99.1% 99.9% Substitutions 99.4% 99.9% Indels 97.0% 99.9% All CNV 94.3% 99.9% Amplifications 94.0% 99.9% Losses 94.8% 99.8% Rearrangements 100.0% 99.9% This study evaluated a test set of 165 specimens. PPA and NPA between the F1CDx and F1 LDT, using the F1 assay as the reference method, was calculated for all alterations, as well as for alterations binned by type: short variants, copy number alterations (CNAs) and rearrangements. A total of 2325 variants, including 2026 short variants, 266 copy number alterations and 33 rearrangements were included in the study.

Comprehensive genomic profiling can identi more options for patients The approach used by FoundationOne CDx has been shown by our FoundationOne assay to identify more patients, compared with traditional single-gene testing methods, who test positive for genomic alterations in several cancer types. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Simplifies the practice of guidelines-based medicine in NSCLC by including all guideline-recommended genes and offering results on MSI and TMB to help inform decisions on immunotherapy with one comprehensive test Comprehensive genomic profiling can identify up to 35% and 17% more patients with ALK fusions and EGFR alterations, respectively, compared with traditional FISH and PCR-based methods 1 2 FoundationOne CDx can identify resistance mechanisms and important negative results that can be used for patient management Identifies patients with BRAF V600E alterations who may benefit from therapy Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Comprehensive genomic profiling can identify up to 12% more patients with resistant KRAS alterations compared with traditional PCR-based methods 3 Identifies resistant NRAS alterations that can be used for patient management Identifies alterations such as BRAF and ERBB2 that can be used for patient management Breast Cancer FoundationOne CDx can identify patients with ERBB2 alterations who may benefit from HER2 therapy Detects drug resistance mechanisms, including diverse ESR1 alterations that may inform patient management regarding hormone therapy and various RB1 alterations that may inform patient management regarding CDK4/6 inhibitors Melanoma Comprehensive genomic profiling can identify up to 37% more patients with important BRAF alterations compared with traditional PCR-based methods 4 Up to 40% of melanoma patients are TMB-High and have been shown to respond to immunotherapies 5 Detects resistance mechanisms such as NRAS and MEK1 that may inform patient management Ovarian Cancer FoundationOne CDx can identify patients with germline (inherited) or somatic (not inherited) BRCA1/2 alterations who may benefit from PARP inhibitors current testing methods often look only for germline alterations and may not identify up to 50% of patients who have somatic alterations* * FoundationOne CDx does not distinguish between germline and somatic alterations. ALL OTHER SOLID-TUMOR CANCERS FoundationOne CDx uses a comprehensive approach across 324 genes to provide cancer-relevant alterations that may inform treatment management in accordance with professional guidelines. COMPREHENSIVE SUPPORT SERVICES FOR CLINICAL TRIALS Clinical trials, which are listed based on genomic alterations (provided as a professional service) and many are supported by Precision Enrollment, which identifies patients with rare or specific biomarkers, such as NTRK fusions, and matches them with sponsor trials using our SmartTrials engine.

Go beyond PD-L1 for immunotherapy decisions FoundationOne CDx provides MSI and TMB on every test, and PD-L1 by IHC can be ordered as supplemental test. Patients across cancer types may test positive for any one of three biomarkers (MSI, TMB, PD-L1), which may help inform immunotherapy decisions* TMB may help inform immunotherapy decisions for patients who are negative for PD-L1 by IHC High TMB status has been found in patients across cancer types MSI may inform eligibility for immunotherapies, which are approved for metastatic cancer patients with MSI-High or mismatch-repair deficient (dmmr) solid tumors PD-L1 by IHC can be ordered as a supplemental test and may inform eligibility for several immunotherapies across many different cancer types * Data based on Foundation Medicine experience. Goodman et al, Tumor Mutational Burden as an independent predictor of response to immunotherapy in diverse cancers. AACR Aug 29 2017. FDA website: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/informationondrugs/approveddrugs/ ucm560040.htm. There is no companion diagnostic test identified and approved by the FDA for MSI and pembrolizumab. 14 % of patients who test negative for PD-L1 by IHC have MSI-High or TMB-High status, which may help inform immunotherapy decisions*

About Foundation Medicine Foundation Medicine is a world-leading molecular insights company offering a suite of testing and support services to connect physicians and their patients to the latest cancer treatment approaches and making precision medicine a reality for thousands. For more information, please visit foundationmedicine.com or follow us on Twitter (@FoundationATCG). TO LEARN MORE: Visit www.foundationmedicine.com/f1cdx TO ORDER: Available to order in early 2018 References 1. Drilon A, Wang L, Arcila ME, et al. Broad, hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing identifies actionable genomic alterations in lung adenocarcinomas otherwise negative for such alterations by other genomic testing. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(16):3631 3639. 2. Ali SM, Hensing T, Schrock AB, et al. Comprehensive genomic profiling identifies a subset of crizotinib-responsive ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer not detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Oncologist. 2016;21(6):762 770. 3. Rankin A, Klempner SJ, Erlich R, et al. Broad Detection of Alterations Predicted to Confer Lack of Benefit From EGFR Antibodies or Sensitivity to Targeted Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer. The Oncologist. 2016. 4. Boussemart et al. Hybrid-capture based genomic profiling identifies BRAF V600 and non-v600 alterations in melanoma samples negative by prior testing. ESMO 2017. 5. DB Johnson et al, Cancer Immunology Research 2016. FoundationOne CDx is a next-generation sequencing based in vitro diagnostic device for detection of substitutions, insertion and deletion alterations, and copy number alterations in 324 genes and select gene rearrangements, as well as genomic signatures including microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) using DNA isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue specimens. For the complete intended use statement, including companion diagnostic indications, please see the FoundationOne CDx Technical Information, www.foundationmedicine.com/f1cdx. 2017 Foundation Medicine, Inc. FoundationOne CDx is a trademark of Foundation Medicine, Inc. www.foundationmedicine.com Tel. 888.988.3639 Fax 617.418.2290 MKT-0115-01