GUIDELINES FOR PULMONARY NODULE MANAGEMENT : RECENT CHANGES AND UPDATES

Similar documents
PULMONARY NODULES AND MASSES : DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH AND NEW MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES.

Pulmonary Nodules & Masses

LUNG NODULES: MODERN MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Evidence based approach to incidentally detected subsolid pulmonary nodule. DM SEMINAR July 27, 2018 Harshith Rao

Approach to Pulmonary Nodules

Learning Objectives. 1. Identify which patients meet criteria for annual lung cancer screening

SCBT-MR 2015 Incidentaloma on Chest CT

CT Screening for Lung Cancer for High Risk Patients

Lung Cancer screening :

OBJECTIVES. Solitary Solid Spiculated Nodule. What would you do next? Case Based Discussion: State of the Art Management of Lung Nodules.

Example of lung screening

Lung Cancer Screening: To Screen or Not to Screen?

Pulmonary Nodules. Michael Morris, MD

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society

Best Medical Practices: Maximizing Skills, Minimizing Risk Lung Cancer

Published Pulmonary Nodule Guidelines A Synthesis

PULMONARY NODULES DETECTED INCIDENTALLY OR BY SCREENING: LOTS OF GUIDELINES BUT WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?

Low-dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines for Pulmonary Nodules Management Version 2

I appreciate the courtesy of Kusumoto at NCC for this presentation. What is Early Lung Cancers. Early Lung Cancers. Early Lung Cancers 18/10/55

The small subsolid pulmonary nodules. What radiologists need to know.

Screening Programs background and clinical implementation. Denise R. Aberle, MD Professor of Radiology and Engineering

Thoracic CT pattern in lung cancer: correlation of CT and pathologic diagnosis

The Spectrum of Management of Pulmonary Ground Glass Nodules

DENOMINATOR: All final reports for CT imaging studies with a finding of an incidental pulmonary nodule for patients aged 35 years and older

Rodney C Richie MD FACP FCCP DBIM Texas Life and EMSI

What to know and what to make of it

Pulmonary Nodules: When to worry, when to chill. Douglas Arenberg Associate Professor Pulmonary & Critical Care

Screening for Lung Cancer: Are We There Yet?

SCBT-MR 2015 LungRADS : Basics

Lung Cancer Diagnosis for Primary Care

Guidelines for the Management of Pulmonary Nodules Detected by Low-dose CT Lung Cancer Screening

SCBT-MR 2016 Lung Cancer Screening in Practice: State of the Art

Xiaohuan Pan 1,2 *, Xinguan Yang 1,2 *, Jingxu Li 1,2, Xiao Dong 1,2, Jianxing He 2,3, Yubao Guan 1,2. Original Article

Christine Argento, MD Interventional Pulmonology Emory University

LUNG CANCER SCREENING WHAT S THE IMPACT? Nitra Piyavisetpat, MD Department of Radiology Chulalongkorn University

THE BENEFITS OF BIG DATA

What to Do with Small Lung Nodules Hanh Vu Nghiem, MD William Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak, Michigan

I9 COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS

Lung Cancer Screening: Evidence and current recommendations

Lung Cancer Screening: A review of the recommendations Friday, November 11th, 2016 from 11:45 to 12:15. Dr. Tunji Fatoye Dr.

The Maine Lung Cancer Coalition. Working Together to Reduce Lung Cancer in Maine

C2 COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS

Pulmonologist s Perspective

With recent advances in diagnostic imaging technologies,

Clinical significance of noncalcified lung nodules in patients with breast cancer

Lung nodules: size still matters

Chest Radiology Interpretation: Findings of Tuberculosis

Volume and Mass Doubling Times of Persistent Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules Detected in Patients without Known Malignancy 1

Supplementary Appendix

Lung Cancer Risk Associated With New Solid Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial

Chest imaging III: Nodular pulmonary disease. Ádám Domonkos Tárnoki, MD, PhD Assistant professor Department of Radiology, Semmelweis University 1

Detecting Lung Nodules: Challenges and Solutions. Geoffrey D. Rubin, MD, MBA, FACR, FSCBTMR

I8 COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS

Clinical Significance of Lung Nodules Reported on Abdominal CT

Malignant solitary pulmonary nodules: assessment of mass growth rate and doubling time at follow-up CT

REVIEW ARTICLE. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a review of current status

A Summary from the 2013World Conference on Lung Cancer Sydney, Australia

Abstract Submission Form

Evaluation of Individuals With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer?

University of Groningen. Optimization of nodule management in CT lung cancer screening Heuvelmans, Marjolein

Small Pulmonary Nodules: Our Preliminary Experience in Volumetric Analysis of Doubling Times

A Comprehensive Cancer Center Designated by the National Cancer Institute

Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Characteristics of Subsolid Pulmonary Nodules Showing Growth During Follow-up With CT Scanning

The solitary pulmonary nodule: Assessing the success of predicting malignancy

CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Frequency and Significance of Part-Solid and Nonsolid Nodules

Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas versus Preinvasive Lesions Appearing as Ground-Glass Nodules: Differentiation by Using CT Features 1

Professor John K Field PhD, FRCPath University of Liverpool Cancer Research Centre, UK.

Outcomes in the NLST. Health system infrastructure needs to implement screening

Current Approach to Screening for Lung Cancer. James R Jett M.D.

Projected Outcomes Using Different Nodule Sizes to Define a Positive CT Lung Cancer Screening Examination

Objectives. Why? Why? Background 11/5/ % incurable disease at presentation Locally advanced disease Metastasis. 14% 5 year survival

DISCLOSURE. Lung Cancer Screening: The End of the Beginning. Learning Objectives. Relevant Financial Relationship(s) Off Label Usage

Lung Cancer Screening: Now What?

Role of CT imaging to evaluate solitary pulmonary nodule with extrapulmonary neoplasms

Robert J. McKenna M.D. Chief, Thoracic Surgery Cedars Sinai Medical Center

How to Analyse Difficult Chest CT

Stage I synchronous multiple primary non-small cell lung cancer: CT findings and the effect of TNM staging with the 7th and 8th editions on prognosis

REVIEW. A practical approach to radiological evaluation of CT lung cancer screening examinations

Lung Cancer Screening: To screen or not to screen?

Lung Tumor Cases: Common Problems and Helpful Hints

Lung Cancer Screening: Radiologic and Clinical Implications. Katherine R. Birchard, M.D. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Management of Multiple Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Lesions in Patients with Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma

American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria

Screening for Lung Cancer: New Guidelines, Old Problems

Lung cancer screening: are we ready now?

Imaging Decisions Start Here SM

Imaging in breast cancer. Mammography and Ultrasound Donya Farrokh.MD Radiologist Mashhad University of Medical Since

The revised lung adenocarcinoma classification an imaging guide

Deppen S, et al. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2011;92:

Recommendations for the Management of Subsolid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at CT: A Statement from the Fleischner Society 1

Comparison of three mathematical prediction models in patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule

Subsolid lung nodules, also termed ground-glass nodules

UW Radiology Review Course Breast Calcifications. BI-RADS 5 th Edition

Adenocarcinoma in pure ground glass nodules: histological evidence of invasion and open debate on optimal management

Multifocal Lung Cancer

VA PARTNERSHIP Increase ACCESS to LUNG SCREENING

Lung cancer Screening

MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

Transcription:

Venice 2017 GUIDELINES FOR PULMONARY NODULE MANAGEMENT : RECENT CHANGES AND UPDATES Heber MacMahon MB, BCh Department of Radiology The University of Chicago

Disclosures Consultant for Riverain Medical Minor stockholder in Hologic, Inc. Consultant for GE Healthcare Research Support from Philips Healthcare License and royalty fees from University of Chicago (UC Tech)

What is a Pulmonary Nodule?

Pulmonary Nodule A rounded opacity, well or poorly defined, measuring up to 3 cm in diameter

Nodule Size and Probability of Malignancy Size ELCAP Mayo <3mm 0.1% 2-5mm 1% 4-7mm 0.7% 6-10mm 24% 8-20mm 18.7% 21-30mm 33.3% 21-45mm 80%

Diagnostic Features of Nodules Size Morphology Texture Solid, Part solid, Ground glass Calcification Shape Margins Location Growth rate

Spectrum of NoduleTexture GGO Part Solid Solid

Part-Solid and Non-Solid Nodules in a Screening Program Henschke et al. AJR 2002 ;178:1053-1057 Part-solid: 63% malignant Non-solid: 18% malignant Solid: 7% malignant

Persistent Non-Solid nodules 53 NS nodules in 49 pts Persisted or grew for > 1 month 75% were adenoca/ BAC 6% AAH 19% Nodular fibrosis/organizing pna Kim et al. Radiology 2007 245,1 p267

Atypical Adenomatous Hyperplasia (AAH) Typically GGO <5mm Precursor of adenoca Found in 20% + of lobes resected for lung ca

Ground Glass (Non-Solid) Nodule 7-07 12-08 4-09

Adenocarcinoma Progression 12-2009 6-2010 1-2011 3-2012 10-2013 3-2014

Diagnostic Features of Nodules Size Morphology Texture Attenuation Solid, Part solid, Ground glass Calcium, Fat Shape Margins Location Growth rate

Benign Features Laminar Calc. Central Calc. Fat

Patterns of Calcification Central Laminated Eccentric Popcorn Diffuse Stippled

Calcified Lung Carcinoma Calcium detectable by CT in 10% Usually 2 dystrophic ca++ or engulfed granulomatous ca++ Most calcified carcinomas are 5cm.+ Diffuse, speckled or irregular

Diagnostic Features of Nodules Size Morphology Texture Attenuation Shape Margins Solid, Part solid, Ground glass Calcium, Fat Spherical, elliptical, linear Spiculated, lobulated, smooth Location Growth rate

Nodule Margins Smooth Lobulated Spiculated

Non Solid and Part Solid Nodules Benign Malignant Benign Malignant

Malignant (17) versus Benign (12) Non-solid (GGO) Nodules Margins Malignant Benign Rounded 85% 15% Straight 0 100% Li F, Sone S, Abe H, MacMahon H, Doi K: Radiology (3):233, November, 2004.Pages 793-798

Incidentally detected 5x6mm nodule in a 52 year old never smoker. The most appropriate action would be: 1. 6-12, 18-24 mos CT FU 2. No follow-up 3. PET scan 4. Needle biopsy 5. VATS resection

Diagnostic Features of Nodules Size Morphology Texture Calcification Shape Margins Solid, Part solid, Ground glass Central, Laminar, Popcorn Diffuse Spherical, elliptical, linear Spiculated, lobulated, smooth Location Growth rate

Small Perifissural Solid Nodules De Hoop B, et al.pulmonary perifissural nodules on CT scans: rapid growth is not a predictor of malignancy. Radiology` 2012;265(2):611-16. Myeong I. Ahn MD et al. Perifissural Nodules Seen at CT Screening for Lung Cancer. Radiology: 2010; 254 (3): 949-956.

Diagnostic Features of Nodules Size Morphology Texture Attenuation Shape Margins Location Solid, Part solid, Ground glass Calcium, Fat Spherical, elliptical, linear Spiculated, lobulated, smooth Perifissural, subpleural, upper lobe Growth rate

Growth rate of nodules Volume doubling time (VDT): 26% diameter increase = One volume doubling Typical lung ca. VDT = 100 200 days Range = 30 400 + days

Growth rate of Small Cancers (Hasegawa BJR 2000) Parameter Mean VDT (Days) <10mm 536 >20mm 299 Smoker 292 Non-smoker 607 Adenoca 533 Squamous 129 Small cell 97 GGO 813 Mixed Solid 457 149

Fleischner Society Guidelines 2005 Nodule Size (mm) Low-Risk Patient High-Risk Patient 0-4 None 12 mos >4-6 12 mos 6-12, 18-24mos >6-8 6-12, 18-24mos 3-6, 9-12, 24mos >8 Follow-up CT at around 3, 9, and 24mo, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, PET, and/or bx

Fleischner Society Guidelines 2005 Nodule Size (mm) Low-Risk Patient High-Risk Patient 0-4 None 12 mos >4-6 12 mos 6-12, 18-24mos >6-8 6-12, 18-24mos 3-6, 9-12, 24mos >8 Follow-up CT at around 3, 9, and 24mo, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, PET, and/or bx Reduced number of scans for benign nodules Reduced expense Reduced radiation exposure

Fleischner Society Guidelines Solitary Subsolid Nodules (2013): Nodule type Management recommendations Solitary pure GGNs: <5mm >5mm No CT FU required 3 mos, then annual for at least 3 yrs Solitary part-solid nodules: 3 mos FU CT, then annual LDCT if solid part <5mm. If solid part >5mm then consider Bx or surg.

Fleischner Society Guidelines Multiple Subsolid Nodules (2013): Nodule type Management recommendations Pure GGNs: <5mm >5mm No CT FU required 3 mos, then annual for at least 3 yrs Dominant Nodules with Part-Solid/Solid Component: 3 mos FU CT, then bx or surgery, especially if solid part <5mm.

Incidental Nodules Exclusions: Patients with unexplained fever Patients with known or suspected metastases Patients < 35 years of age Lung Cancer Screening

Screening Detected vs Incidental Nodules Screen Detected Nodule Limited age range & high cancer risk Surgical candidate Understand risks and benefits Incidental Nodule Wide age range Comorbid conditions Variable motivation & understanding

Screening Detected vs Incidental Nodules Screen Detected Nodule Limited age range & high cancer risk Surgical candidate Understand risks and benefits Negative report > 12 month CT Incidental Nodule Wide age range Comorbid conditions Variable motivation & understanding Negative report > no follow up

New Evidence International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (ielcap) National Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST) Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Study (PanCan) & British Columbia Cancer Agency Trial (BCCA) Nederlans-Leuvens Longkanker Screenings Onderzoek (NELSON) UKLS (UK), MILD (Italy), DANTE (Italy), DLCST (Denmark), LUSI (Germany), DEPISCAN (France)

Fleischner Guidelines 2017 : Threshold Size Relationship between Nodule Size and Probability That a Nodule Is Lung Cancer. McWilliams A et al. N Engl J Med 2013;369:910-919.

New Evidence McWilliams A et al. N Engl J Med 2013;369:910-919 Factors Odds Ratio Age, per year 1.03 Sex, female vs male 1.82 Family History 1.34 Emphysema 1.34 Nodule Type GGN 0.88 PS 1.46 Solid Reference Nodule Location, upper lobe 1.93 Nodule Count, per extra nodule 0.92

Revised Guidelines 2017: Purpose Apply new evidence to determine optimal management strategy Reduce number of unnecessary CT scans

Revised Guidelines 2017: Purpose Apply new evidence to determine optimal management strategy Reduce number of unnecessary CT scans Allow greater discretion to radiologists, clinicians and patients in management decisions - Consider morphology - Comorbid conditions - Patient preference

Fleischner Guidelines 2017 General recommendations: Contiguous thin section CT technique (1mm) Coronal & sagittal recons Low radiation technique for follow up scans

Revised Fleischner Guidelines 2017 General recommendations: Contiguous thin section CT technique (1mm) Coronal & sagittal recons Low radiation technique for follow up scans

3mm 1mm Calcified granuloma

? Nodule

Axial Coronal Sagittal

Revised Fleischner Guidelines 2017 General recommendations: Contiguous thin section CT technique (1mm) Coronal & sagittal recons Low radiation technique for follow up scans

Fleischner Society Guidelines 2005 Nodule Size (mm) Low-Risk Patient High-Risk Patient 0-4 None 12 mos >4-6 12 mos 6-12, 18-24mos >6-8 6-12, 18-24mos 3-6, 9-12, 24mos >8 Follow-up CT at around 3, 9, and 24mo, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, PET, and/or bx

Fleischner Guidelines 2005 vs 2017 Nodule Size (mm) * Low-Risk Patient High-Risk Patient 0-<4 None 12 mos < 6 None + 12 mos >4-6 12 mos 6-12, 18-24mos >6-8 6-12, 18-24mos 3-6, 9-12, 24mos 6-8 6-12, +18-24mos 6-12, 18-24mos >8 Follow-up CT at around 3, 9, and 24mo, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, PET, and/or bx >8 Consider 3 mos CT, PET/CT or bx *Measure average diameter to nearest millimeter

Fleischner Guidelines 2005 vs 2017 Nodule Size (mm) * Low-Risk Patient High-Risk Patient 0-<4 None 12 mos < 6 1 mm change None + 12 mos Less FU >4-6 12 mos 6-12, 18-24mos >6-8 6-12, 18-24mos 3-6, 9-12, 24mos 6-8 Only 3 groups 6-12, +18-24mos 6-12, 18-24mos >8 Follow-up CT at around 3, 9, and 24mo, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, PET, and/or bx >8 Consider 3 mos CT, PET/CT or bx *Measure average diameter to nearest millimeter

Fleischner Subsolid Guidelines 2013 vs 2017 Nodule Size (mm) * Management recommendations GGN < 5mm No FU < 6mm No FU >5mm 3 mos CT then annual for3 yrs > 6mm 6-12 mos CT then every 2 yrs until 5 yrs PSN < 5mm No FU < 6mm No FU > 5mm 3 mos then annual for 3 yrs > 6mm 3-6 mos CT then annual x 5 yrs

Fleischner Subsolid Guidelines 2013 vs 2017 Nodule Size (mm) * Management recommendations GGN < 5mm No FU < 6mm No FU >5mm 3 mos CT then annual for3 yrs > 6mm 6-12 mos CT then every 2 yrs until 5 yrs Same size threshold: < 5mm= <6 PSN when rounding < 5mm No FU < 6mm No FU > 5mm 3 mos then annual for 3 yrs > 6mm 3-6 mos CT then annual x 5 yrs

Fleischner Subsolid Guidelines 2013 vs 2017 Multiple Subsolid Nodules Nodule type Pure GGNs: <5mm >5mm <6mm Dominant Nodules with Part-Solid/Solid Component: >6mm Management recommendations No CT FU required 3 mos, then annual for at least 3 yrs 3-6 mos, then +2 and 4 yr CT FU 3 mos FU CT, then bx or surgery, especially if solid part <5mm. 3-6 mos CT, then based on most suspicious nodule

Fleischner Subsolid Guidelines 2013 vs 2017 Multiple Subsolid Nodules Nodule type Pure GGNs: <5mm >5mm <6mm Management recommendations No CT FU required 3 mos, then annual for at least 3 yrs 3-6 mos, then +2 and 4 yr CT FU Dominant Nodules with Part-Solid/Solid Component: Multiple Subsolid Nodules 3 mos FU CT, then bx or surgery, especially if solid part <5mm. 3-6 mos CT, then based on most suspicious nodule. If stable, consider 2 and 4 yr CT Optional later first FU, then longer FU

Fleischner Subsolid Guidelines 2013 vs 2017 Multiple Subsolid Nodules Nodule type Pure GGNs: <5mm >5mm Dominant Nodules with Part-Solid/Solid Component: Multiple Subsolid Nodules <6mm >6mm Management recommendations No CT FU required 3 mos, then annual for at least 3 yrs 3 mos FU CT, then bx or surgery, especially if solid part <5mm. 3-6 mos CT. If stable, consider 2 and 4 yr CT. 3-6 mos CT. Subsequent management based on the most suspicious nodule.

Fleischner Subsolid Guidelines 2013 vs 2017 Multiple Subsolid Nodules Nodule type Pure GGNs: <5mm >5mm Dominant Nodules with Part-Solid/Solid Component: Multiple Subsolid Nodules <6mm >6mm Management recommendations No CT FU required 3 mos, then annual for at least 3 yrs 3 mos FU CT, then bx or surgery, especially if solid part <5mm. 3-6 mos CT. If stable, consider 2 and 4 yr CT. 3-6 mos CT. Subsequent management based on the most suspicious nodule. Same size threshold as before Consider longer FU for some with multiple small subsolids

Revised Fleischner Guidelines 2017

Fleischner Guidelines 2017 Less routine follow-up for very small nodules More flexibility for follow up timing depending morphology and patient preference Longer follow up for suspicious sub-solid nodules