Cancer Care Ontario / Ontario Public Drug Programs

Similar documents
Patient Involvement in Drug Coverage Review Ontario Public Drug Programs Patient Evidence Submissions

CADTH SYMPOSIUM 2016 Scott Gavura, Director, Provincial Drug Reimbursement Programs

DRUG PRODUCT INTERCHANGEABILITY AND PRICING ACT

Notice from the Executive Officer: Promoting Compliance with the Existing Limited Use Criteria for Fentanyl Transdermal Patch

Ontario s Narcotics Strategy

Number: III-45 Effective Date: 1 February 2012 Revised Date: November 2016

Overview. Ontario Public Drug Programs, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Ontario Public Drug Programs

Chapter 18 Section 2. EXPIRED - Department Of Defense (DoD) Cancer Prevention And Treatment Clinical Trials Demonstration

Notification for Outpatient Injectable Chemotherapy for Medicare Advantage Plans Frequently Asked Questions

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Initial Economic Guidance Report Osimertinib (Tagrisso) for Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

risks. Therefore, perc agreed that the reimbursement criteria should match the eligibility criteria of the SELECT trial.

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

Eligibility Form. 1. Patient Profile. (This form must be completed before the first dose is dispensed.) Request prior approval for enrolment

1. When are dispensers able to provide publicly funded naloxone emergency kits for Ontarians?

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Economic Guidance Report Osimertinib (Tagrisso) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer January 4, 2019

Guide to Dental Benefit Plans

This Frequently Asked Questions document contains various aspects of UIIP in the following sections. Overview Eligibility...

Ministry of Children and Youth Services. Follow-up to VFM Section 3.01, 2013 Annual Report RECOMMENDATION STATUS OVERVIEW

Section 8 Administrative Plan (revised January 2000) Chapter 22 # page 1

MCSS Schedule of Dental Hygiene Services and Fees January 2018

MINISTRY REPONSE TO THE ONTARIO CITIZENS COUNCIL REPORT: INFORMING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW DRUG PROGRAM IN ONTARIO

EVIDENCE IN BRIEF OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

EVIDENCE IN BRIEF OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

Section 5. Study Procedures

The pcodr review also provided contextual information on ALK mutation testing.

Corporate Policies. Corporate Billing and Collection Policy Section:

Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Overdose Prevention Sites: User Guide for Applicants

VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE UNDERTAKING OF ELI LILLY CANADA INC. TO THE PATENTED MEDICINE PRICES REVIEW BOARD

South West Regional Cancer Program. Cancer Plan

Office of the Auditor General Portage Avenue Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C 0C4

Pfizer Independent Grants for Learning & Change Request for Proposals (RFP) Rheumatoid Arthritis Mono- and Combination DMARD Therapy in RA Patients

Certificate in Peer Support (Mental Health) (Level 4)

WELLPOINT RESPONDS TO ANCO s COMMENTS

Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Ontario Public Drug Programs. 1. What changes are occurring to the ONPP?

How to change the legal classification of a medicine in New Zealand

Hearing aid dispenser approval process review Introduction Hearing aid dispenser data transfer... 6

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. PHARMACEUTICAL COMMITTEE 21 October 2015

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Economic Guidance Report Crizotinib (Xalkori) Resubmission for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

UNDERSTANDING NEW HAMPSHIRE DENTAL CLAIMS DATA

perc deliberated upon: a pcodr systematic review other literature in the Clinical Guidance Report providing clinical context

pcodr EXPERT REVIEW COMMITTEE (perc) FINAL RECOMMENDATION

CHAPTER 7 SECTION 24.1 PHASE I, PHASE II, AND PHASE III CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS TRICARE POLICY MANUAL M, AUGUST 1, 2002 MEDICINE

Alcohol interventions in secondary and further education

BMA INFORMATION BULLETIN No. 23. International Safety Management (ISM) Code

METROLINX ADMINISTRATIVE FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS RULES OF PRACTICE

OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

EVIDENCE IN BRIEF OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

General Terms and Conditions

BENEFICIARY HANDBOOK

Ontario Stroke Network Provincial Integrated Working Group: Rehabilitation Intensity- FINAL REPORT

Alberta - US Comparator: Standard-Making and Enforcement Functions

Z E N I T H M E D I C A L P R O V I D E R N E T W O R K P O L I C Y Title: Provider Appeal of Network Exclusion Policy

pcodr EXPERT REVIEW COMMITTEE (perc) FINAL RECOMMENDATION

HDS PROCEDURE CODE GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION

Primary Health Networks

Interchangeable Drug Products - Additional Criteria

Research Ethics for Human Participants Process

Chronic Hepatitis B Drug Therapies: Frequently Asked Questions

Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing Intervention--Exploring a Strategy for

Committee to Evaluate Drugs (CED)

PREFACE. Saskatchewan is participating in the Common Drug Review (CDR).

Enhanced service specification Childhood seasonal influenza vaccination programme NHS England gateway reference: 01641

RE: Proposed Amendments to the Pharmacy Act Regulations, O. Reg.202/94 General

USDA Demonstration Project for Non-Congregate Feeding for Outdoor Summer Meal Sites Experiencing Excessive Heat

Frequent Dispensing Frequently Asked Questions

PHYSIOTHERAPY ACT AUTHORIZATION REGULATIONS

EVIDENCE IN BRIEF OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

Request for Proposal. PA ACT 139 Naloxone Purchase

International Standard for Athlete Evaluation. July 2015

NOTE: The first appearance of terms in bold in the body of this document (except titles) are defined terms please refer to the Definitions section.

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Economic Guidance Report Irinotecan liposome (Onivyde) for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer January 5, 2018

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Economic Guidance Report Palbociclib (Ibrance) for Advanced Breast Cancer Resubmission November 21, 2016

Manufacturer Comments Clinical Evidence Review Report and Supplemental Update and Pharmacoeconomic Review Report

IPC Athletics Classification Rules and Regulations

Cannabis Regulations Response and Update on Cannabis Legalization

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Submitter or Manufacturer Feedback on a pcodr Expert Review Committee Initial Recommendation

Deductible 3 Individual $50 $50. Annual Maximum Benefit: Per Individual $2,000 $2,000

OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY X-RAY MACHINE PROGRAM AND PI HANDBOOK For easy navigation, please use Adobe s bookmark feature.

Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Presentation to the CPSO Methadone Prescribers Conference

Specialty Training Committee in Respiratory and Sleep Medicine. Criteria for Accreditation of Advanced Training Sites in Adult Sleep Medicine

Note: each state has different drug and alcohol testing rules. Refer to your state regulations to ensure compliance with state and local requirements

pcodr EXPERT REVIEW COMMITTEE (perc) FINAL RECOMMENDATION

For the 2017/2018 Influenza Immunization Season. Patient Eligibility. Description. Ontario Public Drug Programs, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

REPORT Meeting Date: July 4, 2013 Regional Council

Cannabis Legalization

Managed Health Services (MHS) Candace V. Ervin Market Manager, Indiana Provider Relations October 18, 2017

TOBACCO CONTROL POLICY

Frequently Asked Questions for Ontario Pharmacists: Blood Glucose Test Strip Reimbursement Policy

CANM ACMN Annual Meeting April

Enhanced Service Specification. Childhood seasonal influenza vaccination programme 2018/19

Reimbursement Information for Diagnostic Ultrasound and Ultrasound-guided Procedures Commonly Performed by Otolaryngologists

COMMON RULE 2019 IMPLEMENTATION DATE: JANUARY 21, 2019

Trademark Use Guidelines for Certified Products and Related Advertising

Role Description: Regional Colon Cancer Screening/GI Endoscopy Clinical Lead

Enhanced Service Specification. Childhood seasonal influenza vaccination programme 2017/18

NIH NEW CLINICAL TRIAL REQUIREMENTS AND FORMS-E

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines

Telecom Order CRTC

Harm Reduction Program Enhancement Questions and Answers. Population and Public Health Division Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Transcription:

Cancer Care Ontario / Ontario Public Drug Programs Policy: Public funding of cancer drugs and their administration within the context of clinical trials Version: 3.0 Effective Date: December 12, 2016 Replaces Policy: Version 2.0 dated January 29, 2016 Policy Owner: Provincial Drug Reimbursement Programs

Contents A. INTRODUCTION... 3 B. BACKGROUND ON PUBLIC FUNDING OF CANCER DRUGS... 3 C. DEFINITIONS... 3 D. SCOPE... 6 E. APPLICATION AND ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW... 6 F. APPLICATION PROCESS... 7 G. APPLICATION SCREENING CRITERIA... 7 H. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA... 8 I. REVIEW PROCESS... 9 J. RE-EVALUATION, RECONSIDERATION AND RESUBMISSION... 9 2 P age

A. INTRODUCTION The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) and Cancer Care Ontario are strongly supportive of clinical trial research and believe it is an important component of high quality care that strives to improve the outcomes of cancer patients in Ontario. The MOHLTC and Cancer Care Ontario recognize that clinical trials help to advance the scientific understanding of cancer and its treatment and that patients may be given the option to enter into clinical trials at some point in their cancer treatment journey. Increasingly, public payers are being asked to reimburse publicly funded cancer drugs when they are used as a component of clinical trials research, or after the patient has participated in a clinical trial, even when the patient is no longer eligible under the existing cancer drug funding policies. This has raised questions about how to clarify the potential funding implications of participation in clinical trials while supporting the generation of new knowledge through clinical trials. In the past, drug reimbursement programs were faced with difficult adjudication decisions when it was identified that patients participating in clinical trials had become ineligible for publicly funded cancer drugs. Patients and clinicians may not have been aware of cancer drug funding implications when patients were enrolled into a clinical trial. Drug reimbursement programs may not have been made aware that a patient was enrolled in a clinical trial until an adjudication decision had to be made. These challenges have led to the development of a policy, which introduces an application and assessment process to provide guidance as to how participation in a particular clinical trial may impact eligibility for public cancer drug funding. The intent of this policy is to clarify how access to public cancer drug funding may be affected by participation in a clinical trial, both during or subsequent to a trial. B. BACKGROUND ON PUBLIC FUNDING OF CANCER DRUGS Ontario has an established process for evaluating cancer drugs for public funding. The drug funding policies under the New Drug Funding Program (NDFP), the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) Program (Exceptional Access Program (EAP) and Formulary listing either as General Benefit (GB), GB with Therapeutic notes, or Limited Use (LU)), or the Systemic Treatment-Quality Based Program (ST-QBP) are aligned with the evidence from the trials that established their clinical benefit. The MOHLTC funds cancer drugs in clinical trials for eligible patients when the drugs are used in accordance with the reimbursement criteria that have been approved through an established process for publicly funded drugs within the province. The MOHLTC also provides funding for the administration costs when the drugs or regimens are listed as evidence-informed for funding through ST-QBP. However, it is important to note that the MOHLTC does not directly fund clinical trials. C. DEFINITIONS Aligned for the purpose of drug funding: A publicly funded cancer drug used within or subsequent to a clinical trial is used in accordance with the existing drug funding policy. 3 P age

Aligned to Systemic Treatment-Quality Based Program (ST-QBP): Trials meeting the definition of a clinical trial will receive funding for the cost of selected drugs that are not funded through the New Drug Funding Program (NDFP) or the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) Program, which are evidence-informed (i.e., older and inexpensive drugs), and their administration costs. Clinical trials that do not evaluate the anti-cancer impact of a new drug or regimen but are designed to assess only a diagnostic, symptom management or resource utilization question, for example, would be considered to be not aligned. However, if patients are receiving an evidenceinformed standard of care within the context of a non-aligned trial, they will still receive facility funding for the evidence-informed treatment and its administration. Applicant: A practicing physician affiliated with an Ontario hospital who is involved in the clinical trial that is recruiting patients at his/her hospital. Application: A completed Clinical Trial Request Intake form, submitted to Cancer Care Ontario in accordance with the process set out in Section F. Clinical trial: For the purposes of funding through the Systemic Treatment-Quality Based Program (ST-QBP), a clinical trial is an intervention to evaluate a drug or biologic agent for its anti-cancer activity that has undergone institutional (peer) review and received ethics approval at the institutional or provincial level. Drug funding policy: Lists the eligibility criteria for a specific cancer drug or combination of cancer drugs for a given indication (i.e., reason for use) that are publicly funded under the New Drug Funding Program (NDFP), the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) Program (Exceptional Access Program (EAP) and Formulary listing either as General Benefit (GB), GB with Therapeutic notes, or Limited Use (LU)). The criteria in each drug funding policy is approved by the Executive Officer of the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care's (MOHLTC) Ontario Public Drug Programs (OPDP). Exceptional Access Program (EAP): Facilitates patient access to drugs not funded on the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) Formulary, or where no listed alternative is available. In order to receive coverage, the patient must be eligible to receive benefits under the ODB program. EAP requests are reviewed on a case-by-case basis according to reimbursement criteria developed through an established evidence-based drug review process. Indication: The purpose or use of a treatment or intervention. Limited Use (LU): Drugs that are listed in the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) Formulary with specific clinical criteria/conditions for use and will be reimbursed under the ODB program only when those criteria/conditions have been met. Line of therapy: For many cancers, a sequence of standard treatment options is used. A line of therapy refers to a place in this sequence. Historically, clinical trials and health technology assessments of cancer drugs have been established on lines of therapy and consequently, lines of therapy have been included in the eligibility criteria of publicly funded cancer drugs. As a general principle, a cancer drug used within a clinical trial is considered a line of therapy. In certain circumstances, it may be reasonable to consider the cancer drug, biologic or regimen used within a clinical trial as an investigational line (i.e., not a line of therapy) if any of the following applies: 4 P age

o Sufficient evidence does not exist for that cancer drug in that type of cancer and treatment setting (e.g., metastatic or adjuvant). o The cancer drug does not have a Health Canada Notice of Compliance (NOC) for the requested indication. o The cancer drug is used in a dose, route or schedule substantially different from the publicly funded method of administration. o The cancer drug is used in combination with other drugs for an indication for which the combination is not publicly funded even if each of the individual agents is publicly funded for the clinical indication. New Drug Funding Program (NDFP): A publicly funded drug program within the Ontario Public Drug Programs (OPDP). NDFP directly covers the cost of many newer, and often very expensive, injectable cancer drugs administered in hospitals and cancer centres. Not aligned for the purpose of drug funding: A publicly funded cancer drug used within or subsequent to a clinical trial that is not in accordance with the existing drug funding policy. Ontario Drug Benefit Program (ODB): The ODB Program provides coverage for over 4,400 drug products. With funding provided by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) and the Ministry of Community and Social Services, the ODB Program covers most of the cost of prescription drug products listed in the Formulary. As well, drugs that are not listed in the Formulary are considered for coverage, on a case-by-case basis, through the MOHLTC's Exceptional Access Program (EAP). Ontario residents: Residents of Ontario who have a valid Ontario Health Card. Reconsideration: The applicant may request a reconsideration of an initial application or a resubmission request with a negative assessment (i.e., not aligned), if the applicant believes the assessment criteria were wrongfully applied to the application in the absence of new pertinent information that may change the assessment. Regimen: A drug or combination of drugs that is given according to a specific dose, schedule, and duration. Resubmission: The applicant may request a resubmission of an initial application with a negative assessment (i.e., not aligned), if the applicant has new evidence or pertinent information that may change the assessment. Systemic Treatment-Quality Based Program (ST-QBP): Funds hospitals for the cost of administering cancer chemotherapy. Funding from ST-QBP may also cover the cost of some lowcost generic drugs not otherwise funded through other drug funding programs. 5 P age

D. SCOPE I. This policy will 1. Provide clarity and transparency as to how participation in a clinical trial may potentially impact the patient s eligibility for public funding of cancer drugs 2. Describe the framework, the criteria and the process by which clinical trial applications will be assessed 3. Clarify when older or inexpensive drugs, the preparation and delivery of treatment, and related clinical care for patients on clinical trials is provided through the Systemic Treatment-Quality Based Program (ST-QBP). II. This policy will not 1. Promote funding of a cancer drug, biologic or regimen beyond the original evidence-informed intent for which it is publicly funded either through NDFP, EAP, LU or ST-QBP 2. Provide interim drug funding for indications that are under review or expected to be reviewed for public funding in Ontario 3. Approve or fund clinical trials E. APPLICATION AND ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW The clinical trials application and assessment process outlined in Sections F-I below will enable Cancer Care Ontario to provide guidance as to how clinical trial participation may impact eligibility for public cancer drug funding. An application for assessment of a clinical trial will not necessarily ensure that there will be funding available for the drugs used in the trial or used subsequently in the management of the patients. A patient-specific NDFP enrolment, EAP application or LU prescription by a referring clinician would still be required to confirm patient eligibility. As outlined above in Section B, a patient s eligibility for public cancer drug funding is determined by the existing NDFP, EAP, LU or other drug funding program processes and criteria, which are initiated by a referring clinician on behalf of an individual patient. Clinicians must apply directly to EAP if requesting EAP drugs within or subsequent to clinical trial participation. Clinicians must document the trial identifier and the use of the investigational agent(s) in the EAP application. Further, patients must be eligible to receive ODB benefits. All copays and deductibles associated with the program must continue to be satisfied. After receiving a Clinical Trial Request Intake form, Cancer Care Ontario will provide an assessment of the clinical trial to the applicant in accordance with this policy. This process is described in more detail in Section F. The assessment will be made publicly available on the Cancer Care Ontario website, and will clarify whether participation in the clinical trial is likely to render the patient ineligible for publicly funded cancer drugs (and if so, which drugs and under what circumstances), based on the drug funding policies in effect at the time of the assessment. However, as stated in the previous paragraph, funding decisions are made on a patient-specific basis through existing drug funding programs. A clinical trial assessment does not constitute a funding decision, but provides general guidance based on current drug funding policies. Since drug funding policies could change over time, patients must meet criteria at the time funding is sought. The clinical trial assessment does not replace patient-specific NDFP, EAP, LU or other drug funding program approvals required at the time of the funding request. 6 Page

F. APPLICATION PROCESS I. An application must be completed by a practicing physician in Ontario. A single applicant may apply on behalf of multiple participating hospitals in Ontario. II. An application must be completed in full for each trial and submitted to clinicaltrials@cancercare.on.ca. III. IV. It is recommended that a completed application be submitted for review as soon as the information is available. This can be submitted prior to or simultaneously with a submission to a Research Ethics Board for review. Upon receipt of a completed application, Cancer Care Ontario will aim to provide a full assessment to the applicant within 30 days. Cancer Care Ontario s turnaround time may be extended if additional information is required or if the assessment is complex and requires further consultation with disease site experts and the MOHLTC. Cancer Care Ontario estimates that approximately 30% of applications will require such further consultation, resulting in an estimated 60-day turnaround time. G. APPLICATION SCREENING CRITERIA I. Cancer Care Ontario will screen each application for completeness. In the case of missing information, Cancer Care Ontario will contact the applicant as necessary. Requests will not be assessed until the application is deemed complete. The onus is on the applicant to provide complete and accurate information. II. III. IV. For an application to be complete, the following must be included The clinical trial schema The dosing schedule The cancer drug(s) and indication(s) for which cancer drug funding is being requested The cancer drug(s) and indication(s) funded by the clinical trial sponsor The standard of care the patient would receive if not on a clinical trial The application must clearly identify the treatment algorithm for all study arms subsequent to trial participation. This includes an explanation of patient management if The patient is withdrawn from study due to excessive toxicity There is disease progression The patient refuses further participation on the trial There is disease recurrence after the trial is completed Potential cancer drug funding implications associated with clinical trial participation, particularly those related to the use of publicly funded cancer drugs subsequent to participating in a clinical trial, should be identified in the application (e.g., when eligibility criteria for the requested cancer drug funding policy may not be met if the patient participates in a clinical trial). Cancer Care Ontario may identify additional potential policy implications in the context of its evaluation and will communicate to the applicant via the assessment. 7 P age

H. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA The following assessment criteria and considerations will be used to provide guidance as to whether a publicly funded cancer drug used within a trial, or subsequent to a trial may be eligible for public funding in Ontario, based on current drug funding policy. DRUG ELIGIBILITY The publicly funded cancer drug within the clinical trial must be used for an indication that is currently publicly funded in Ontario. The use of the publicly funded cancer drug within a clinical trial must meet the current cancer drug funding policy in Ontario. CONSIDERATIONS Additional treatments, cycles, or duration of therapy for the publicly funded cancer drug that is significantly different from the approved cancer drug funding policy will not be funded. Additional cumulative dose or duration of administration for the publicly funded cancer drug that is significantly different from the approved cancer drug funding policy will not be funded. The publicly funded cancer drug within a clinical trial will not be publicly funded if used for an indication that is not currently publicly funded in Ontario (e.g., a different type of cancer, retreatment, or maintenance). The publicly funded cancer drug within a clinical trial will not be publicly funded if used for an indication that was considered and rejected for public funding in Ontario. Assessment of line of therapy o As a general principle, a cancer drug used within a clinical trial is considered a line of therapy. In certain circumstances, it may be reasonable to consider the cancer drug, biologic or regimen used within a clinical trial as an investigational line (i.e., not a line of therapy) if any of the following applies: Sufficient evidence does not exist for that cancer drug in that type of cancer and treatment setting (e.g., metastatic or adjuvant). The cancer drug does not have a Health Canada Notice of Compliance (NOC) for the requested indication. The cancer drug is used in a dose, route or schedule substantially different from the publicly funded method of administration. The cancer drug is used in combination with other drugs for an indication for which the combination is not publicly funded even if each of the individual agents is publicly funded for the clinical indication. o When a cancer drug funding policy stipulates a line of therapy, the following will be assessed for each requested drug The current cancer drug funding algorithm or expected sequence. The current cancer drug funding policy criteria. A comparison of the mechanism of action of the cancer drug(s) used within the clinical trial to cancer drug(s) used subsequent to the clinical trial. A clinical trial that evaluates an investigational agent in a single arm study may receive funding through the ST-QBP for the administration of the investigational agent. 8 P age

Clinical trials evaluating new drug treatments against a standard of care intervention in a phase II or III trial may receive funding support for the administration of the standard of care regimen. The participating hospitals may also receive reimbursement for the drugs used within the clinical trial either through ST-QBP (for older drug regimens), NDFP, or ODB, as appropriate. I. REVIEW PROCESS The review process consists of the following: I. Upon receipt of a complete application, Cancer Care Ontario program staff will assess the request against the current drug funding policy. II. III. IV. Cancer Care Ontario program staff will consult with MOHLTC program staff as appropriate (i.e., when requests involve cancer drugs funded through EAP or LU or where interpretation of this policy is required). Cancer Care Ontario program staff will consult with disease site specific experts as appropriate (i.e., if clinical input is required). Cancer Care Ontario program staff will prepare the assessment and notify the applicant via email. The use of identified publicly funded cancer drugs during or subsequent to the trial will be deemed aligned or not aligned with current drug funding policy. The administration costs of treatment will be deemed aligned or not aligned with ST-QBP s definition of a clinical trial. Where applicable, Cancer Care Ontario will provide the applicant with information on potential funding implications. The applicant is responsible for communicating the outcome of the assessment and relevant information to other Ontario investigators, as appropriate. V. All assessment results, and a list of all assessed and under review applications will be published weekly on the clinical trials assessment table posted on Cancer Care Ontario s Systemic Treatment Clinical Trials webpage. J. RE-EVALUATION, RECONSIDERATION AND RESUBMISSION a. RE-EVALUATION Over time, new information may emerge that may change the assessment of an application (e.g., a new cancer drug becomes publicly funded or a revision is made to an existing drug funding policy). Patients must meet funding criteria at the time funding is sought. In the event that Cancer Care Ontario becomes aware that new information may impact the assessment of a clinical trial, Cancer Care Ontario will re-evaluate the application(s), inform the original applicant if there is a change in the assessment, and update the clinical trials assessment table posted on Cancer Care Ontario s Systemic Treatment Clinical Trials webpage. 9 P age

There are two options available to an applicant who has received a negative assessment (i.e., not aligned ): b. RESUBMISSION The applicant may file another submission following an initial application with an assessment of not aligned if the applicant has new evidence or pertinent information that may change the assessment. To resubmit, the applicant must highlight the new information on the initially submitted application form and email it to clinicaltrials@cancercare.on.ca. Cancer Care Ontario will review resubmissions filed at any point after a negative assessment. Cancer Care Ontario will aim to provide a re-assessment to the applicant within 30 days. Turnaround times may be extended if additional information is required or for complex requests that require further consultation with disease site experts and/or the MOHLTC. c. RECONSIDERATION Within 30 days of the date specified on the final assessment, the applicant may request a reconsideration of an initial application or a resubmission request with a negative assessment (i.e., not aligned), if the applicant believes the assessment criteria were wrongfully applied to the application but does not have new evidence or pertinent information that may change the assessment. The applicant must file for reconsideration to clinicaltrials@cancercare.on.ca with the following information 1. Identify and explain which criteria were wrongfully applied. 2. Describe how the drug funding policy was incorrectly applied or interpreted. The reconsideration will be reviewed by a panel, which may include disease site specific experts, Cancer Care Ontario program staff and clinical leads, and MOHLTC program staff who may or may not have previously assessed the application. No new information will be allowed in the case of a reconsideration. Applicants with new information should file a resubmission, as described above. 10 P age