Key words: Canola meal, B. juncea meal, composition, digestibility, pigs

Similar documents
The Evaluation of Dehulled Canola Meal as a Replacement for Soybean Meal in the Diets of Growing and Finishing Pigs

Amino Acid Digestibility and Energy Concentration of Fermented Soybean Meal and Camelina Meal for Swine 1

Nutritive Value of Canola Meal: The Dietary Fibre Story

Amino acid digestibility and energy concentration of fermented soybean meal and camelina meal for swine

The effect of canola meal processing by heat, moisture and ammonium bicarbonate on metabolisable energy and nitrogen retention in broiler chicken

EVALUATION OF JUNCEA MEAL FOR GROWING

Tryptophan Bioavailability in Soybean Meal for Young Pigs

Nutrient digestibility in canola meal for broilers: Effects of oil extraction method and fractionation by air classification

What is ProPound Canola Meal?

What is ProPound Canola Meal?

Canola Meal and its Uses and Opportunities to Increase Value

Summary. Procedures. (Key Words: Sorghum, Distillers Grains, Waxy, Endosperm, Finishing Pigs.) Introduction

R. O. Gottlob, J. M. DeRouchey, M. D. Tokach, R. D. Goodband, J. L. Nelssen, S. S. Dritz 2, C. W. Hastad, K. R. Lawrence, and D. A.

Energy utilization of reduced oil-dried distillers grains with solubles (RO-DDGS) in swine

Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports

Abd El-Rahman, H.H; Y.A. A. El-Nomeary; A. A. Abedo; Fatma M. Salman and M. I. Mohamed

A COMPARISON OF WHEY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE AND SPRAY-DRIED ANIMAL PLASMA IN DIETS FOR WEANLING PIGS 1

Digestibility to swine of energy and nutrients in field peas.

Open Access RESEARCH. Changsu Kong 1* and Olayiwola Adeola 2

Carlos A Montoya and Pascal Leterme 1

VARIATION IN CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SOYBEAN HULLS 1. F. F. Barbosa, M. D. Tokach, J. M. DeRouchey, R. D. Goodband, J. L. Nelssen, and S. S.

Determining the threonine requirement of the high-producing lactating sow. D.R. Cooper, J.F. Patience, R.T. Zijlstra and M.

What We ve Learned About Feeding Reduced-Oil DDGS to Pigs

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames. 4

Overview of Production, Nutrient Profile, Physical Characteristics, and Quality Assessment of New Generation DDGS

Dr. Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Lecompte FINAL REPORT. January 14, 2011

ENERGY AND NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY IN DISTILLERS DRIED GRAIN WITH SOLUBLES FED TO GROWING PIGS

METABOLISM AND NUTRITION. Glandless Cottonseed Meal for Laying and Breeding Hens and Broiler Chicks

Jennifer E. Wubben 1, David M. Albin 1, Michelle R. Smiricky 2 and Vince M. Gabert 3. Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Introduction

Opportunities for Using DDGS in Livestock and Poultry Feeds in Canada. Dr. Jerry Shurson Dept. of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Whey-Grown Yeast as a Protein Source for Baby Pigs

Variation in chemical composition of soybean hulls

Protein Deposition in Growing and Finishing Pigs

Grain Sorghum as a Feedstuff For Livestock

260 FEED AND INDUSTRIAL RAW MATERIAL: Feed

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAMS FEED

Evaluation of Chinese Brown Rice as an Alternative Energy Source in Pig Diets**

Effects of Xylanase in High-Co-Product Diets on Nutrient Digestibility in Finishing Pigs 1

ssniff Complete feeds for rabbits and guinea pigs *

BROILER. Nutrition Specifications. An Aviagen Brand

Overview of Completed DDGS Swine Research

Effects of Feeding Varied Levels of Balanced Protein on Growth Performance and Carcass Composition of Growing and Finishing Pigs 1,2

Research Note. Predicting Metabolizable Energy of Normal Corn from its Chemical Composition in Adult Pekin Ducks

Broiler Nutrition Specifications

Overview of Production and Nutrient Content of DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Can Canola meal replace Soybean meal?

Ruminal degradability of neutral detergent insoluble protein of selected protein sources

Composition and Nutritive Value of Corn Fractions and Ethanol Co-products Resulting from a New Dry-milling Process 1

Effect of PHYTASE 5000 (Granular) on the Performance and Nutrient Digestibility of Growing Finishing Pigs

COMPARISON OF INTERNATIONAL PROTEIN CORPORATION 740 FISH MEAL AND SPECIAL SELECT MENHADEN FISH MEAL IN NURSERY PIG DIETS

What are the 6 Nutrients. Carbohydrates Proteins Fats/Oils (Lipids) Vitamins Minerals Water

Comparison of Sample Source (Excreta or Ileal Digesta) and Age of Broiler Chick on Measurement of Apparent Digestible Energy of Wheat and Barley 1

Sustainable Fish Diets for the 21st Century using Soybean Protein. Paul B. Brown, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA

DISTILLERS GRAINS IN POULTRY DIETS

Amino Acid, Carbohydrate, and Fat Composition of Soybean Meals Prepared at 55 Commercial U.S. Soybean Processing Plants

Introduction billion gallons of ethanol were produced in the U.S. during 2009.

Lysine Requirement of Broiler Chickens Fed Low-density Diets under Tropical Conditions

Corn By-Product Diversity and Feeding Value to Non-Ruminants

The Effects of Wheat and Crystalline Amino Acids on Nursery and Finishing Pig Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics 1

CERTAIN OBSERVATIONS ON NUTRITIVE VALUE OF PALM KERNEL MEAL IN COMPARISON TO DEOILED RICE BRAN

Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

EFFECTS OF PEPSOYGEN AND DRIED PORCINE SOLUBLES 50 IN NURSERY PIG DIETS 1

USE OF DDGS AS A FEED INGREDIENT ETHANOL AND DDGS OVERVIEW AN EVOLVING ETHANOL INDUSTRY

Apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in gelatin-based diets by growing pigs

Comparison of Energy Utilisation and Nitrogen Digestibility of rapeseed meals in roosters, broilers and young turkeys.

SWINE DAY D. L. Goehring, M. D. Tokach, J. L. Nelssen, J. M. DeRouchey, R. D. Goodband, S. S. Dritz 3, and J. L. Usry 4

EFFECTS OF FEEDING WHOLE COTTONSEED COATED WITH STARCH, UREA, OR YEAST ON PERFORMANCE OF LACTATING DAIRY COWS

EFFECT OF WHEY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE SOURCE ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF NURSERY PIGS

Threonine Is More Limiting Than Valine in Diets of Lactating Sows with High Rates of Body Protein Loss

FACTORS AFFECTING MANURE EXCRETION BY DAIRY COWS 1

Feeding Value of DDGS for Swine, Dairy, and Beef. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Soybean Use Poultry FACT SHEET MEAL

INFLUENCE OF NUTRIDENSE LOW PHYTATE 1 CORN AND ADDED FAT ON GROWING-FINISHING PIG GROWTH PERFORMANCE

Ranger Gold. Parent Stock NUTRITION SPECIFICATIONS

Development and Evaluation of a New Precision-Fed Chick Assay for Determining Amino Acid Digestibility and Metabolizable Energy of Feed Ingredients

P. A. Thacker* and Shiyan Qiao 1 Department of Animal Science, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A8, Canada

Nutrient Analysis of Sorghum Dried Distillers Grains with Solubles from Ethanol Plants Located in the Western Plains Region 1

Energy and nutrient digestibilities in wheat dried distillers grains with solubles fed to growing pigs

Ractopamine hydrochloride and the environmental sustainability of pork production

NON-STARCH POLYSACCHARIDES AND PHYTATE PHOSPHORUS CONTENT OF COMMONLY AVAILABLE POULTRY FEED INGREDIENTS*

DDGS: An Evolving Commodity. Dr. Jerry Shurson University of Minnesota

August 22, 2017 M. D. Lindemann

DETERMINING THE THREONINE REQUIREMENT OF THE LACTATING SOW 1

An Update on Current Amino Acid Requirements and Energy for Swine K STATE. RESEARCH and EXTENSION. KSUswine.org

Energy 01/02/2013. Jean NOBLET INRA 30/01/ Méthodes de prévision des valeurs nutritives des aliments pour le porc: contexte international

Heidi Rossow, PhD UC Davis School Of Veterinary Medicine, VMTRC Tulare, CA. Interpreting Forage Quality from the Cows Perspective

Full Report (All Nutrients) 01174, Milk, reduced fat, fluid, 2% milkfat, without added vitamin A and vitamin D

Evaluation of Fermented Soybean Meal Sources in Diets for Nursery Pigs 1

Energy and Nitrogen Balance of Pigs Fed Four Corn Grains

The Effect of Enzymes, Steeping and Dietary Protein Level on Apparent Fecal Digestibility and Fecal Output in Pigs fed Corn- Soybean Meal Diets.

Industry. Feeding Swine. Energy. US Per Capita Meat Consumption. Gain (Tissue accretion) Maintenance ME

NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION OF CANOLA MEAL PRODUCED FROM A NEW VARIETY OF CANOLA SEEDS IN BROILER CHICKENS AND LAYING HENS MATTHEW FRANCIS GORSKI THESIS

Protein Dispersibility Index as an Indicator of Adequately Processed Soybean Meal

Effects of Yellow Grease Addition to Broiler Rations Containing DDGS with Different Fat Contents

Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan

ssniff Complete feeds with low phytoestrogen content for rats and mice / nude rats and nude mice*

Transcription:

Nutritional composition and digestibility by 80-kg to 100-kg pigs of prepress solvent-extracted meals from low glucosinolate Brassica juncea, B. napus and B. rapa seed and of solvent-extracted soybean meal J. M. Bell 1, R. T. Tyler 2, and G. Rakow 3 1 Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, 72 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5B5; 2 Department of Applied Microbiology and Food Science, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5A8; and 3 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2. Received 10 October 1997, accepted 17 February 1998. Bell, J. M., Tyler, R. T. and Rakow, G. 1998. Nutritional composition and digestibility by 80-kg to 100-kg pigs of prepress solvent-extracted meals from low glucosinolate Brassica juncea, B. napus and B. rapa seed and of solvent-extracted soybean meal. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 78: 199 203. Seed of Brassica napus canola (cv. AC Excel), B. rapa canola (cv. AC Parkland), and B. juncea canola (line J90-4253) was oil-extracted in a prepress solvent pilot plant. The three canola meals and soybean meal (SBM) (commercial) were fed in four replicates of a digestibility trial to evaluate their digestibility. The meals were mixed with a nutritionally adequate barley-wheat-sbm basal diet at levels of 15 and 30%. Chromic oxide (Cr 2 ) was included at 0.5% of the diet as a chemical marker. Eighteen hybrid gilts, approximately 90 kg, were randomized to the first two replicates involving nine diets, including the basal diet, and this allotment was repeated. Brassica juncea meal (air-dry) contained 43.85% crude protein of 82% digestibility and 18.33 MJ kg 1 of gross energy of 71% digestibility. The corresponding values for B. napus AC Excel meal were 41.78, 81, 18.64 and 64; for B. rapa AC Parkland meal 40.05, 79, 18.45 and 71, and for SBM 45.10, 88, 17.28 and 82. Digestible energy values were: B. juncea 13.9, B. napus 13.0, B. rapa 14.1 and SBM 15.9 MJ kg 1. Key words: Canola meal, B. juncea meal, composition, digestibility, pigs Bell, J. M., Tyler, R. T. et Rakow, G. 1998. Composition nutritionnelle et digestibilité pour des porcs de 80 à 100 kg de tourteaux de pression-extraction obtenus à partir de graines de Brassica juncea, de B. napus et de B. rapa à basse teneur en glucosinolates en comparaison du tourteau de soja obtenu par extraction. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 78: 199 203. Nous avons déshuilé dans un atelier pilote de pression-extraction les graines de Brassica napus, cv AC Excel, de B. rapa, cv AC Parkland et de B. juncea, lignée J90-4253, toutes trois de qualité canola. Les tourteaux résultants ainsi qu un tourteau de soja (TS) du commerce étaient ensuite évalués dans un essai de digestibilité à quatre répétitions. Les tourteaux étaient mélangés à raison de 15 et de 30 % à un aliment de base orge-blé-ts. L oxyde chromique (Cr 2 ) était incorporé dans l aliment à la dose de 0,5 % comme marqueur chimique. Dix-huit cochettes hybrides d environ 90 kg étaient réparties au hasard entre les deux premières répétitions, lesquelles comportaient neuf aliments, y compris le régime de base témoin. Cet allotement était répété deux semaines plus tard dans les deux répétitions restantes. Le tourteau de B. juncea, séché à l air ambiant, contenait 43,85 % de protéine brute, digestible à 82 % et 18,33 MJ kg 1 d énergie brute, digestible à 71 %. Les valeurs correspondantes étaient, pour le tourteau de B. napus cv Excel, 41,78 à 81 % et 18,64 à 64 %, pour celui de B. rapa cv AC Parkland, 40,05 à 79 % et 18,45 à 71 % et enfin pour le TS du commerce, 45,10 à 88 % et 17,28 à 82 %. Les valeurs d énergie digestible étaient, respectivement, de 13,9, 13,0, 14,1 et 15,9 MJ kg 1 pour B. juncea, B. napus, B. rapa et TS. Mots clés: Tourteau de qualité canola, tourteau de B. juncea, composition, digestibilité, porcs Adverse effects of allyl glucosinolates in Brassica juncea meal (oil-extracted) on bodyweight gain and thyroid histology were found in trials with mice and rats (Bell et al. 1971, 1972; Bille et al. 1983) and in pigs (Bell et al. 1981). Treatment of the meal with ammonia reduced the glucosinolate and sinapine contents (McGregor et al. 1983) and improved its feeding value for poultry (Blair 1984) and pigs (Keith and Bell 1985). More recently, the development of a low glucosinolate mustard by Love et al. (1990) gave promise of a canola-quality meal (CM) from low glucosinolate, low erucic acid B. juncea comparable to CM from B. napus or B. rapa. The equivalence of B. juncea meal in broiler chicken diets was demonstrated by Newkirk et al. (1997). 199 The objective of this study was to examine the composition and the digestibility by swine of meal derived from a recent experimental selection of B. juncea and to compare it with meal from common varieties of B. napus and B. rapa, all grown in the same year and location, and with commercial SBM. Abbreviations: ADF, acid detergent fiber; CM, canola meal(s); CP, crude protein; DE, digestible energy; GE, gross energy; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; SBM, soybean meal; TDF, total dietary fiber.

200 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE Table 1. Percentages of dietary gross energy, crude protein, ADF and NDF derived from meals incorporated at 15 and 30% of the diet Diet component derived from meal (%) Meal Weight, air-dry Energy CP ADF NDF AC Excel 15 16.8 32.6 38.7 18.1 B. napus 30 32.4 54.4 60.5 35.0 AC Parkland 15 16.6 31.7 30.3 15.2 B. rapa 30 32.9 53.3 51.6 30.8 J90-4253 15 15.9 33.7 28.7 14.6 B. juncea 30 32.5 55.6 49.5 29.4 Soybean meal 15 15.8 34.3 14.6 7.0 30 31.5 56.3 29.5 15.5 MATERIALS AND METHODS Seed of AC Excel canola (B. napus), AC Parkland canola (Brassica rapa), and J90-4253 canola (B. juncea) was produced on the Research Farm of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada at Saskatoon in 1994. The seed was harvested at full maturity and cleaned to seed standards. Approximately 80 kg of seed of each type was extracted to produce oil and meal at the POS Pilot Plant Inc. (118 Veterinary Road, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 2R4). The seed was first tempered to 8.5% moisture, flaked (0.30 to 0.40 mm), cooked over a period of 40 min reaching a maximum temperature of 97 C, passed through a preheated Simon-Rosedown prepress and solvent extracted using hexane for approximately 90 min. The marc (hexane-solids) was then desolventized in two stages. For about 25 min the marc was sparged with steam and reached 78 to 93 C. It was then transferred to the toasting tray where the temperature was 91 to 103 C and held for about 20 min, then hammermilled using a 5/64 in (approx. 2 mm) round-hole screen. One departure from the above procedure was recorded. The desolventizer temperatures applied to AC Excel CM were approximately 8 C lower than intended. Nitrogen solubility index values (American Oil Chemists Society 1989) were obtained on the meals and reported by the POS Pilot Plant Inc. The Brassica meals and SBM were each mixed at 15 and 30% levels for diets composed of a control or basal fraction and the test meal. The basal fraction contained ground barley 54, wheat 27, SBM 12.75, canola oil 2.5 and a vitaminmineral premix 3.75%. The premix was designed to ensure that all diets met or exceeded the nutrient requirements of pigs for the minerals Ca, P, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, Se and for the vitamins A, D, E, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, pantothenic acid, choline, biotin and B 12 (Bell and Shires 1982). Each diet also contained 0.5% Cr 2, premixed with 0.5% canola oil, as a fecal marker. Procedures for chemical analysis of most feed and feces components reported here have been described (Bell and Keith 1991a) as have procedures for sample collection and preparation and for statistical analysis (Keith and Bell 1991). A Parr adiabatic calorimeter Model 1241 was used to determine gross energy. The Theander and Westerlund (1986) method was used to analyze for total dietary fiber Table 2. Chemical composition of B. napus, B. rapa, B. juncea and SBM used in digestibility trials Excel Parkland Component B. napus B. rapa B. juncea SBM Moisture (%) 8.59 7.68 6.41 10.88 CP (N 6.25)(%) 41.78 40.05 43.85 45.10 Ash (%) 5.30 5.86 7.25 7.67 Ether extract (%) 3.31 3.79 1.82 1.47 GE (kcal kg 1 ) 4458 4408 4378 4129 (MJ kg 1 ) 18.64 18.45 18.33 17.28 Nitrogen solubility index (%) 32.9 17.0 17.3 Fiber (%) ADF 18.36 12.85 12.03 4.89 NDF 24.61 20.16 19.46 8.17 TDF 28.04 26.92 24.83 17.46 % of protein fiber-bound 27 28 24 19 Glucosinolates (µmol g 1 ) Allyl 0.2 0.3 3-butenyl 3.2 3.4 22.6 4-pentenyl 0.4 2.6 1.7 2-OH-3-butenyl 7.4 6.7 3.5 2-OH-3-pentenyl 0.1 1.0 0.1 4-OH-benzyl 3-methylindolyl 1.1 0.2 0.1 4-OH-3-methylindolyl 9.2 4.2 4.0 Amino acids (% of the protein) Aspartic acid 6.41 6.82 6.89 9.31 Threonine 3.35 3.72 3.51 3.37 Serine 4.76 4.87 4.67 5.65 Glutamic acid 14.17 13.98 13.73 14.39 Proline 6.20 6.07 6.07 4.92 Glycine 4.60 4.67 4.56 3.95 Alanine 4.07 4.37 4.29 4.32 Cystine 2.32 2.07 2.05 1.40 Valine 3.18 3.72 3.58 3.48 Methionine 1.89 1.90 1.71 1.40 Isoleucine 2.47 2.95 2.92 3.62 Leucine 5.91 6.24 6.13 6.65 Tyrosine 2.73 2.67 2.59 3.26 Phenylalanine 4.12 4.14 4.04 5.28 Histidine 2.47 2.52 2.55 2.55 Lysine 4.86 5.12 4.74 5.57 Arginine 5.15 5.31 5.77 6.92 Tryptophan 0.69 1.02 0.52 0.89 (TDF) and the protein found in the near-final step in the TDF assay was reported as percentage of sample protein that was fiber-bound. Digestibility coefficients were calculated using regression methods (Keith and Bell 1982). The diets were tested in digestion trials involving 18 gilts randomly allotted in two replicates and this procedure was repeated 2 wk later. This experiment involved two dietary levels of each of the four test meals plus the basal diet. These were fed to individually stalled pigs for 7 d, the last three of which were fecal collection days (Keith and Bell 1991). For a week prior to and following the feeding of the test diets the pigs were fed a standard diet similar to the basal diet but with CM replacing one-half of the SBM. The pigs were PIC hybrid gilts from the Prairie Swine Centre

BELL ET AL. CANOLA MEALS FOR PIGS 201 Table 3. Apparent digestibility of GE, CP, ADF and NDF in diets containing 15 and 30% of test meals; for these components in the basal diet and in diets fed in periods 1 and 2 of the digestion trials Meal in diet Apparent digestibility (%) Meal tested (%) GE SD z CP SD ADF SD NDF SD AC Excel 15 79.5 1.2 79.7 2.2 17.6 2.7 51.5 1.1 B. napus 30 76.4 1.9 79.0 1.9 16.7 5.5 46.0 3.7 AC Parkland 15 80.8 1.0 80.6 0.7 21.9 2.2 57.2 3.0 B. rapa 30 78.7 3.4 81.1 3.2 36.4 3.6 58.7 1.9 J90-4253 15 80.5 0.7 81.4 0.9 20.0 3.0 55.0 1.9 B. juncea 30 78.9 2.0 81.9 2.9 18.4 2.4 51.5 2.7 Soybean 15 82.5 0.9 84.0 1.7 18.1 3.2 57.0 2.1 meal 30 82.5 0.7 84.7 1.1 20.2 2.6 54.0 2.0 Basal diet (observed) 0 82.4 0.8 81.9 0.8 15.5 4.2 57.0 1.6 Basal diet (regression) 0 82.4 0.5 81.8 0.8 14.9 2.1 59.4 1.2 All diets Period 1 80.1 2.5 81.1 1.6 17.6 5.5 53.1 9.9 Period 2 81.5 2.1 82.6 2.1 20.2 6.6 54.9 12.2 z Standard deviation. (PSC Inc.), Saskatoon, derived from Pig Improvement (Canada) Ltd. stock. Average initial and final weights were 82 ± 7 and 95 ± 7 kg. Digestibility values for dry matter, crude protein (CP), gross energy (GE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were calculated by regression methods (Keith and Bell 1982) from the diet digestibility coefficients for the three levels of each meal: 0, 15 and 30% for dry matter and corresponding percentages (Table 1) of the other constituent contributions to the diets by the test meals. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Canola meals obtained from B. napus and B. rapa seed were similar in CP, ash, oil and GE contents (Table 2) but lower than the B. juncea meal in CP and ash. The small differences (<2%) in GE content was caused partly by the lower oil content (ether extract) in B. juncea meal but differences in the amounts and kinds of non-oil and non-protein constituents also may have been involved (Simbaya et al. 1995). The nitrogen solubility index was greater for the B. napus meal (AC Excel) which had been exposed to lower temperatures in the desolventizer-toaster phase of processing than was used for B. rapa or B. juncea meal (Table 2). Fiber, as measured by ADF, NDF and TDF, showed similar values for B. rapa and B. juncea, both of which were lower than B. napus, which is apparently higher in cellulose and lignin. Neutral detergent fiber in Brassica meals comprised 75 to 87% of the TDF compared with 47% in SBM, indicating relatively more cell wall contents and pectins in SBM fiber (Goering and Van Soest 1975). The fiber-bound (cell wall) protein (Table 2), assayed to estimate protein-free TDF, may be of low availability for the pig. These assays indicated that the Brassica meals had 24 to 28% of their protein bound to fiber whereas SBM had about 19%. The glucosinolate levels of the CM revealed a greater amount of indolyl types in B. napus meal than in B. rapa and B. juncea. Brassica juncea glucosinolates were mostly of the 3-butenyl type. Subsequent selections, from which a registered variety may arise, have been developed and contain much lower glucosinolate levels. The amino acid values (Table 2) were expressed as percentages of the protein in order to remove the effects of differences in CP and moisture percentages. While these values are appropriate for this study, more extensive, replicated studies are in progress for comparing cultivars and species. The present results, however, show lower values for methionine, lysine and tryptophan in B. juncea than in B. napus and B. rapa meals. All CM samples exceeded SBM in cystine and methionine and had lower values for isoleucine, leucine, lysine, arginine and tryptophan. The digestibility of GE and CP in the diets averaged about 80% (Table 3). Digestibility of SBM diets was greater than for Brassica diets and equaled or exceeded the values obtained for the basal diet. Digestibility of ADF showed greater variability than found with GE and CP but it is possible that ADF in B. rapa diets was more digestible than in B. napus and B. juncea diets. The lowest values for ADF digestibility were found in the basal diets. Digestibility of NDF was over 50% in most cases and showed little effect of level or source of NDF in the diet. It is also evident in Table 3 that there was good agreement between observed and regression-derived values for digestibility of components of the basal diet. It was also found that the digestibility values for period 2 were numerically greater (P > 0.05) than for period 1. Significant effects of pig weight on digestibility have been found with younger pigs and over a larger weight range than was involved in the present study (Roth and Kirchgessner 1984; Bell and Keith

202 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE Table 4. Average digestibility of diets containing three levels (0, 15, 30%) of either Excel or Parkland CM, J90-4253 mustard meal or SBM, with coefficients of variability and probability values for linear, quadratic and level of meal effects Average digestibility Coefficient Probability for of diets of Linear Quadratic Level of Component Meal (%) variability effect effect meal effect Dry matter AC Excel 78.7 2.1 <0.01 0.71 <0.01 B. napus AC Parkland 80.0 3.1 0.06 0.81 0.15 B. rapa J90-4253 79.7 1.8 <0.01 0.78 0.01 B. juncea SBM 81.7 1.2 1.00 1.00 1.00 Gross energy Crude protein NDF ADF AC Excel 79.4 2.0 <0.01 0.89 <0.01 AC Parkland 80.7 3.0 <0.01 0.84 0.14 J90-4253 80.6 1.8 <0.01 0.89 0.02 SBM 82.5 1.1 0.94 0.90 0.99 AC Excel 80.5 2.2 0.12 0.42 0.21 AC Parkland 81.6 1.5 0.97 0.10 0.25 J90-4253 81.8 2.6 0.94 0.67 0.90 SBM 83.6 1.7 0.02 0.71 0.07 AC Excel 52.4 8.0 <0.01 0.67 <0.01 AC Parkland 58.5 7.3 0.71 0.49 0.15 J90-4253 55.4 7.2 0.02 0.79 0.01 SBM 56.9 6.7 0.06 0.95 1.00 AC Excel 16.6 29.5 0.68 0.67 0.83 AC Parkland 23.8 18.1 <0.01 0.10 <0.01 J90-4253 17.9 21.0 0.28 0.24 0.23 SBM 17.9 21.9 0.13 0.93 0.29 1988, 1991b). These findings indicate that the digestibility values obtained in the present experiment may exceed those appropriate for grower pigs because the pigs used in our experiment weighed about 90 kg. Tests for linear and quadratic effects of increasing levels of test meals yielded different results depending on the meal used and the diet component assayed (Table 4). For dry matter, the responses were linear in the case of the Brassica meals but with SBM the digestibility of its dry matter was similar to that of the basal diet, hence the lack of a relationship between meal level and digestibility. Similar linear and quadratic effects were observed with GE digestibility. Digestibility of dietary protein (Table 4) failed to show a linear response among levels of Brassica meals mainly because the digestibility of meal CP and basal CP was similar (Table 3). In contrast there was a linear response with SBM because its CP was more digestible than the basal CP. The different solubility indices (Table 2) associated with different processing temperatures for AC Excel and AC Parkland (32.9 and 17.0%, respectively) were not reflected in different CP digestibility (80.5 and 81.6%, respectively, Table 4). The relatively high content of fiber-bound CP in Brassica meals, compared with SBM (24 to 28 vs. 19% of the CP), was associated with lower digestibility of CP (79.4 to 80.7 vs. 82.5%, respectively) but it is evident that the fiber-bound CP in Brassica meals was partially digestible by pigs. The digestibility of NDF showed a linear response (P < 0.05) with AC Excel CM and B. juncea meal, with declining digestibility as the percentage of test meal in the diet increased (Tables 3 and 4). The NDF in AC Parkland CM was of similar digestibility to the basal NDF, so the response was not linear. The linear effect with SBM diets was borderline (P = 0.06). Differences among meals may be attributed in part to genetic differences in the chemical components of NDF but the relatively high coefficients of variability (Table 4), compared with those of GE or CP, probably also affected the linear responses. Variability in digestibility of ADF was greater than for NDF (Table 4) and significant linear effects were obtained only with AC Parkland CM which had greater digestibility of ADF than the other meals, including SBM (Table 3). As with NDF, genetic differences in the kinds and amounts of ADF components may have accounted for some of the meal species differences although the non-starch polysaccharides in meal derived from yellow and brown strains of canola were similar (Simbaya et al. 1995). Stringam et al. (1974) found that rapeseed with yellow seed color had 40% less hull than occurred in seed with brown seed coats. The hulls of yellow seed contain less crude fiber, NDF, ADF and

lignin than brown hulls and are significantly more digestible for pigs (Bell and Shires 1982). AC Parkland CM has partly yellow seed color and the J90-4253 B. juncea seed was yellow, which was reflected in the lower fiber content of the meals. Estimates were made of the digestibility of CP in the test meals per se, derived from the regression relationship between the percentage of the total dietary CP supplied by the test meal and the digestibility (%) of CP in the diet at each of the three levels of test meal employed (0, 15 and 30%, air-dry basis, Table 2). Apparent digestibility of CP in the Brassica meals was similar to that of the basal diet CP, viz. AC Excel 81, AC Parkland 79, B. juncea 82 and basal 81%. The CP digestibility of SBM was 88%. The average digestibility of CP in Period 1 was 81 and of Period 2 was 83%, indicating a pig age or weight effect. Digestibility of GE, similarly estimated, resulted in values of 64% for AC Excel, 71 for AC Parkland, 71 for B. juncea and 82% for SBM. As occurred with CP, pig age or weight effects were evident; Period 1 was 70 and Period 2 was 74% for digestibility of GE. Estimates of the DE kg 1, dry matter basis, for these samples of meal were as follows: AC Excel 3120, AC Parkland 3375, B. juncea 3340 and SBM 3815 kcal, or 13.0, 14.1, 13.9 and 15.9 MJ, respectively. These values agree with those of the National Research Council (1988) for SBM at 3878 and for commercial CM at 3118 Kcal kg 1 dry matter basis. It is concluded that meal derived from B. juncea (line J90-4253) was similar to that from AC Parkland CM in terms of DE and digestible protein content as determined using finisher pigs. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Financial support was provided by the Saskatchewan Wheat Pool, Agricultural Research and Development, 210-407 Downey Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 4L8, and a Food Safety Grant from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa. Technical assistance in seed processing was provided by R. Kruger, POS Pilot Plant Corporation, 118 Veterinary Road, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 2R4 and is gratefully acknowledged. Dawn Abbott and Luba Atamanenko gave valuable service in analyses and manuscript preparation, Sandra Hodgson in statistical aspects and David Dixon in the management of the pigs. This project was approved by the local Animal Care Committee. American Oil Chemists Society. 1989. Official methods and recommended methods of AOCS 4th ed. Official method Ba 11-65. D. Firestone, ed. Re-approved 1989. AOCS, Champaign, IL. Bell, J. M. and Keith, M. O. 1988. Effects of barley hulls, dietary protein level and weight of pig on digestibility of canola meal fed to finishing pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 68: 493 502. Bell, J. M. and Keith, M. O. 1991a. A survey of variation in the chemical composition of commercial canola meal produced in Western Canadian crushing plants. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 71: 469 480. Bell, J. M. and Keith, M. O. 1991b. Effect of pig weight and barley hulls on the digestibility of energy, protein and fibre in wheat, corn and hulless barley diets. Nutr. Res. 11: 1307 1316. BELL ET AL. CANOLA MEALS FOR PIGS 203 Bell, J. M. and Shires, A. 1982. Composition and digestibility by pigs of hull fractions from rapeseed cultivars with yellow or brown seed coats. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 62: 557 565. Bell, J. M., Benjamin, B. R. and Giovannetti, P. M. 1972. Histopathology of thyroids and livers of rats and mice fed diets containing Brassica glucosinolates. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 52: 395 406. Bell, J. M., Shires, A., Blake, J. A., Campbell, S. and McGregor, D. I. 1981. Effect of alkali treatment and amino acid supplementation on the nutritional value of yellow and Oriental mustard meal for swine. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 61: 783 792. Bell, J. M., Youngs, C. G. and Downey, R. K. 1971. A nutritional comparison of various rapeseed and mustard seed solvent-extracted meals of different glucosinolate composition. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 51: 259 269. Bille, N., Eggum, B. O., Jacobsen, I., Olsen, O. and Sorensen, H. 1983. Antinutritional and toxic effects in rats of individual glucosinolate (± myrosinase) added to a standard diet. 1. Effects on protein utilization and organ weights. Z. Tiephysiol. Tierenähr. Futtermittelkd. 49: 195 210. Blair, R. 1984. Nutritional evaluation of ammoniated mustard meal for chicks. Poult. Sci. 63: 754 759. Goering H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1975. Forage fibre analysis. Agric. Handbook No. 379, ARS, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Keith, M. O. and Bell, J. M. 1982. Effects of ammoniation on the composition and nutritional quality of low glucosinolate rapeseed (canola) meal. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 62: 547 555. Keith, M. O. and Bell, J. M. 1985. Amino acid supplementation of ammoniated mustard meal for use in swine feeds. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 65: 937 944. Keith, M. O. and Bell, J. M. 1991. Composition and digestibility of canola press cake as a feedstuff for use in swine. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 71: 879 885. Love, H. K., Rakow, G., Raney, J. P. and Downey, R. K. 1990. Development of low glucosinolate mustard. Can. J. Plant Sci. 70: 419 424. McGregor, D. I., Blake, J. A. and Pickard, M. D. 1983. Detoxification of Brassica juncea with ammonia. Pages 1426 1431 in Proc. 6th Int. Rapeseed Conf., Paris, France. National Research Council. 1988. Nutrient requirements of swine. 9th Rev. ed., National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Newkirk, R. W., Classen, H. L. and Tyler, R. T. 1997. Nutritional evaluation of low glucosinolate mustard meals (Brassica juncea) in broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 76: 1272 1277. Roth, F. X. and Kirchgessner, M. 1984. Digestibility of energy and crude nutrients in the pig in response to feeding level and live weight. Z. Tiephysiol. Tierenähr. Futtermittelkd. 51: 79 87. Simbaya, J., Slominski, B. A., Rakow, G., Campbell, L. D., Downey, R. K. and Bell, J. M. 1995. Quality characteristics of yellow-seeded Brassica seed meals: Protein, carbohydrates, and dietary fiber components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43: 2062 2066. Stringam, G. R., McGregor, D. I. and Pawlowski, S. H. 1974. Chemical and morphological characteristics associated with seed coat color in rapeseed. Pages 99 108 in Proc. 4th Int. Rapeseed Conf., Giessen, Germany. Theander, O. and Westerlund, E. A. 1986. Studies on dietary fibre. Improved procedures for analysis of dietary fibre. J. Agric. Food Chem. 34: 330 336.