Objectives. Management of Septic Shock. Definitions Progression of sepsis. Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Major goals of therapy

Similar documents
Evidence-Based. Management of Severe Sepsis. What is the BP Target?

towards early goal directed therapy

SHOCK. Emergency pediatric PICU division Pediatric Department Medical Faculty, University of Sumatera Utara H. Adam Malik Hospital

Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2012 & Update for David E. Tannehill, DO Critical Care Medicine Mercy Hospital St.

EFFECT OF EARLY VASOPRESSIN VS NOREPINEPHRINE ON KIDNEY FAILURE IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK. Alexandria Rydz

Controversies in Hospital Medicine: Critical Care. Vasopressors, Steroids, and Insulin Therapy

Pediatric Sepsis Treatment:

SEPSIS 2015 DISCLOSURES FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES 9/1/2015. William M. Johnson, MD Nebraska Pulmonary Specialties. William Johnson

Staging Sepsis for the Emergency Department: Physician

Sepsis overview. Dr. Tsang Hin Hung MBBS FHKCP FRCP

Sepsis Management: Past, Present, and Future

Sepsis: Identification and Management in an Acute Care Setting

Diagnosis and Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock. Martin D. Black MD Concord Pulmonary Medicine Concord, New Hampshire

Septic Shock. Rontgene M. Solante, MD, FPCP,FPSMID

Sepsis is an important issue. Clinician s decision-making capability. Guideline recommendations

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

Case year old female nursing home resident with a hx CAD, PUD, recent hip fracture Transferred to ED with decreased mental status BP in ED 80/50

Update in Critical Care Medicine

IV fluid administration in sepsis. Dr David Inwald Consultant in PICU St Mary s Hospital, London CATS, London

Immunomodulation and Sepsis in Oncological Patients. Imad Haddad, M.D. Medical Director, PICU Banner Children s Hospital at BDMC

Surviving Sepsis Campaign

Objectives. Epidemiology of Sepsis. Review Guidelines for Resuscitation. Tx: EGDT, timing/choice of abx, activated

Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock. An Overview

Early Goal-Directed Therapy

Patient Safety Safe Table Webcast: Sepsis (Part III and IV) December 17, 2014

Surviving Sepsis. Brian Woodcock MBChB MRCP FRCA FCCM

Pediatric Septic Shock. Geoffrey M. Fleming M.D. Division of Pediatric Critical Care Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville, Tennessee

CORTICOSTEROID USE IN SEPTIC SHOCK THE ONGOING DEBATE DIEM HO, PHARMD PGY1 PHARMACY RESIDENT VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER BROWNSVILLE

What works in sepsis. Topics. EGDT: Severe Sepsis/ Shock. Sepsis

3/14/2017. Pediatric Sepsis: From Goal Directed Therapy to Protocolized Care. Objectives. Developmental Response to Sepsis

Sepsis: Update on Diagnosis, Evaluation and Management

Sepsis Management Update 2014

The Pharmacology of Hypotension: Vasopressor Choices for HIE patients. Keliana O Mara, PharmD August 4, 2018

Current State of Pediatric Sepsis. Jason Clayton, MD PhD Pediatric Critical Care 9/19/2018

4/5/2018. Update on Sepsis NIKHIL JAGAN PULMONARY AND CRITICAL CARE CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY. I have no financial disclosures

Episode 50 Pediatric Sepsis With Dr. Sarah Reid & Dr. Gina Neto. Pediatric Sepsis

Fluid Resuscitation and Monitoring in Sepsis. Deepa Gotur, MD, FCCP Anne Rain T. Brown, PharmD, BCPS

6/5/2014. Sepsis Management and Hemodynamics. 2004: International group of experts,

Vasopressors in Septic Shock. Keith R. Walley, MD St. Paul s Hospital University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada

BC Sepsis Network Emergency Department Sepsis Guidelines

The Management of Septic Shock

The Septic Patient. Dr Arunraj Navaratnarajah. Renal SpR Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE CPD EVENING. Dr Alastair Morgan Wednesday 13 th September 2017

Sepsis and Hemodynamic Support in September 15, 2017 Carleen Risaliti

Inflammation. Sepsis Ladder

The Ever Changing World of Sepsis Management. Laura Evans MD MSc Medical Director of Critical Care Bellevue Hospital

Sepsis New Management Strategies

DESIGNER RESUSCITATION: TITRATING TO TISSUE NEEDS

Frank Sebat, MD - June 29, 2006

Billion

John Park, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine

Cardiovascular Management of Septic Shock

Management of Severe Sepsis:

Should Roids Be the Rage in Septic Shock? Lauren Powell, MSN, RN, CCRN, AGACNP-BC CHI Baylor St. Luke s Medical Center, Houston, TX

Vasopressors for shock

Sepsis Update: Focus on Early Recognition and Intervention. Disclosures

Printed copies of this document may not be up to date, obtain the most recent version from

FLUID RESUSCITATION AND MONITORING IN SEPSIS PROTOCOLIZED VS USUAL CARE DEEPA BANGALORE GOTUR MD, FCCP ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL

Sepsis: Management ANUPOL PANITCHOTE, MD. Division of Critical Care Medicine Department of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand

Sepsis Awareness and Education

Dilemmas in Septic Shock

Nothing to disclose 9/25/2017

9/25/2017. Nothing to disclose

Initial Resuscitation of Sepsis & Septic Shock

Evidence- Based Medicine Fluid Therapy

Ralph Palumbo, MD, FCCP

Updates in Sepsis 2017

The syndrome formerly known as. Severe Sepsis. James Rooks MD. Coordinator of critical care education OU College of Medicine, Tulsa

Sepsis. From EMS to ER to ICU. What we need to be doing

Sepsis Bundle Project (SEP) Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: April 2015 Most recent Revision: December 2018

HYDROCORTISONE SEPSIS: WHY AND WHEN? Eduardo Juan Troster,MD, Cristiane Freitas Pizarro, MD

Pediatric Shock. National Pediatric Nighttime Curriculum Written by Julia M. Gabhart, M.D. Lucile Packard Children s Hospital at Stanford

EARLY GOAL DIRECTED THERAPY : seminaires iris. Etat des lieux en Daniel De Backer

PEEP recruitment maneuver

Steroid in Paediatric Sepsis. Dr Pon Kah Min Hospital Pulau Pinang

Shock and hemodynamic monitorization. Nilüfer Yalındağ Öztürk Marmara University Pendik Research and Training Hospital

Sepsis and Septic Shock

No conflicts of interest

Fluids in Sepsis: How much and what type? John Fowler, MD, FACEP Kent Hospital, İzmir Eisenhower Medical Center, USA American Hospital Dubai, UAE

Looking for sepsis. Sepsis: Update. Prevalence of High Profile Dzs. Screening and risk stratification. Mortality of High Profile Diseases

Epidemiology of Severe Sepsis

No conflicts of interest to disclose

AnnMarie Papa, DNP,RN,CEN,NE-BC,FAEN, FAAN Clinical Director, Emergency, Medical & Observation Nursing Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Endocrine and Metabolic Complications in the ICU

Presented by: Indah Dwi Pratiwi

Printed copies of this document may not be up to date, obtain the most recent version from

New Strategies in the Management of Patients with Severe Sepsis

PHYSIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF THE SEPTIC PATIENT

UPDATES IN SEPSIS MANAGEMENT Shannon Fry, Pharm.D. Critical Care Pharmacy Specialist St. Joseph Medical Center

Back to the Future: Updated Guidelines for Evaluation and Management of Adrenal Insufficiency in the Critically Ill

Sepsis and Septic. James Allen, M.D. Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine The Ohio State University

Identification & Treatment of Sepsis for the Pediatric Population

4/4/2014. Of patients diagnosed with sepsis 50% will develop severe sepsis 25% will develop shock. SIRS Sepsis Severe Septic Sepsis Shock.

Managing Patients with Sepsis

Nurse Driven Fluid Optimization Using Dynamic Assessments

R2R: Severe sepsis/septic shock. Surat Tongyoo Critical care medicine Siriraj Hospital

Titrating Critical Care Medications

Acute Liver Failure: Supporting Other Organs

9/13/2015. Laboratory. HPI and PE

Objectives. Outline. Sepsis Incidence and Outcomes. Definitions

Transcription:

Objectives Management of Septic Shock Review of the Evidence and Implementation of Pediatric Guidelines at Christus Santa Rosa Manish Desai, M.D. PL 5 2 nd year Pediatric Critical Care Fellow Review of current evidence and practice recommendations in septic shock Implement a set of pediatric guidelines to improve the quality of care in our patients with septic shock Establish quality indicators for monitoring adherence to the guidelines Definitions Progression of sepsis Sepsis Systemic inflammatory response to an infection Severe sepsis Sepsis and associated inflammatory response with organ dysfunction, hypotension, or hypoperfusion Septic shock Sepsis induced hypotension and inadequate organ perfusion despite adequate fluid resuscitation Epidemiology of severe sepsis Incidence of 3 cases per 1000 people annually Overall hospital mortality rate 28.6% Pediatric 10% Adults 38.4% (higher in many studies) Average cost of $2200 per case and an annual cost 16.7 billion dollars nationally Major goals of therapy Resuscitation to correct hypoxia, hypotension, and impaired tissue oxygenation Identify source of infection and treat to include antimicrobials and/or surgery Maintain organ system function and halt the development of multiorgan dysfunction Early goal directed therapy 263 adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock Goal directed therapy or standard therapy upon presentation and for initial 6 hours Resuscitation goals Central venous pressure (CVP) 8 Mean arterial pressure (MAP) 65 Urine output 0.5 cc/kg/hr Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO 2 ) 70% Rivers E, et al, N Engl J Med 2001 1

Early goal directed therapy Interventions used to achieve goals Aggressive fluid resuscitation to reach CVP 8 Vasopressors to reach MAP 65 Transfusion of PRBCs until Hct 30 followed by use of inotropic agents to reach ScvO 2 70% Early goal directed therapy improved mortality (30.5% versus 46.5%, p=0.009) Early reversal of shock Retrospective review of 91 children presenting to community physicians with septic shock Reversal of shock by community physicians within first 75 minutes improved survival by >9 fold Each hour of persistent shock beyond this point was associated with a >2 fold increased mortality Adherence to ACCM PALS resuscitation guidelines led to improved survival: 8% vs 38% mortality Han YY, Carcillo JA, et al, Pediatrics 2003 Rivers E, et al, N Engl J Med 2001 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Evidence based guidelines Areas of management addressed include: Aggressive fluid resuscitation Antibiotic therapy and source control Vasopressors and inotropes Stress dose and low dose corticosteroids Glycemic control Mechanical ventilation Pediatric considerations Fluid resuscitation Fluid resuscitation to CVP 8 Give fluid as long as hemodynamic improvement is seen Decrease rate of fluid administration when increases in filling pressures are not associated with improved hemodynamics Antibiotic Therapy and Source Control Give Broad spectrum antibiotic therapy within the first hour Obtain cultures before starting antibiotics, but do not delay antibiotics for cultures Start at least one antibiotic for all likely pathogens which penetrate to all likely sources Antibiotic Therapy and Source Control Reassess antibiotics daily Combination therapy for pseudomonas Combination therapy for neutropenia Recommend duration of therapy be 7 to 10 days, longer for select cases Remember: blood cultures may be negative in up to 50% bacterial or fungal infections 2

Antibiotic Therapy and Source Control Identify sources requiring control as early as possible, ideally within 6 hours Identify abscesses that need drainage and devices (including lines) that may be infected When source control is required, recommend least invasive effective intervention be done If intravascular device is a possible source of septic shock, recommend prompt removal Antibiotics: Every hour counts Retrospective study of 2,154 adults Giving antibiotics within the first hour of hypotension led to a 79.9% survival rate Each hour delay over the next 6 hours was associated with a 7.6% decrease in survival Only 50% of septic shock patients received antibiotics within the first 6 hours Kumar, et al, Crit Care Med 2006 Antibiotics: Err on the side of caution Retrospective study of 5,715 adults Examined appropriateness of antibiotic therapy based on infection site and relevant pathogens Appropriate antibiotics started in 80% of cases Survival rates after appropriate vs inappropriate antibiotics were 52% vs 10.3% (p<0.0001) Kumar, et al, Chest 2009 Antibiotics and acute kidney injury Retrospective study of 4,532 adults 64.4% developed some degree of AKI Patients who developed AKI had longer delays in antibiotics (4.3 hrs vs 6 hrs, p<0.0001) Increased odds of AKI per hour of delay (OR 1.14) AKI increased mortality (OR 1.73, p<0.0001) Bagshaw, et al, Intensive Care Med 2009 Vasopressors Recommend that MAP be kept 65 Recommend either norepinephrine or dopamine as first choice Suggest epinephrine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin should not be administered as first line Vasopressors Suggest epinephrine be the first chosen alternative to dopamine or norepinephrine Vasopressin 0.03 units/min may be added later Recommend that all patients requiring vasopressors have arterial line as soon as practical if resources are available 3

Norepinephrine vs. Dopamine Trial of 1679 adults with shock (all types) who received norepinephrine or dopamine first line No significant difference in overall mortality More arrhythmias with dopamine (24 vs 12%, p<0.001) Dopamine showed higher mortality only in cardiogenic shock patients (p=0.03) De Backer, et al, NEJM 2010 Vasopressors Epinephrine considered second line due to potential for ischemia and effects on gastric blood flow Epinephrine vs Norepinephrine Randomized trial of 280 adults with shock No difference in mortality 13% of patients epinephrine group patients withdrawn for lactic acidosis or tachycardia Myburgh, et al, Intensive Care Med 2008 Vasopressors Vasopressin depleted after initial hours of septic shock, giving rationale for low dose vasopressin VASST trial 778 adults with pressor dependent septic shock receiving low dose vasopressin or norepinephrine No significant difference in mortality or adverse effects overall, but vasopressin was more beneficial in less severe septic shock group Inotropic therapy Recommend dobutamine be used as first line therapy in the presence of myocardial dysfunction evidenced by elevated filling pressures and low cardiac output Recommend against strategy of increasing cardiac index to some predetermined elevated value in an effort to improve oxygen delivery Corticosteroids Multiple large RCTs in the 1980s showed that high doses of steroids were not beneficial and caused an increase in the rate of secondary infections More recently, lower doses have been used for relative insufficient stress responses Large randomized placebo controlled adult study 7 days of low dose steroids improved survival in nonresponders to corticoptopin stimulation 53% vs 63% mortality (p=0.02) Annane, et al, NEJM 2002 CORTICUS study Corticosteroids Multicenter, randomized, placebo controlled trial of 499 adults (largest trial of steroids in shock) No difference in mortality for patients receiving hydrocortisone in all patients regardless of their response to corticotropin stimulation Faster shock reversal in those receiving hydrocortisone, but increased superinfections 4

Corticosteroids Surviving Sepsis Campaign Suggest IV hydrocortisone only be used in septic shock that is poorly responsive to fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy Steroid therapy should not be guided by corticotropin stimulation test results Cortisol levels or response to stimulation test do not predict who will respond clinically to steroids with hemodynamic improvement Recombinant activated protein C Mixed results in adults, but showed benefit in severe sepsis and septic shock (APACHE II >25) RESOLVE trial Large clinical trial in pediatric patients with sepsis Stopped early due to lack of benefit Increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage, especially in infants 60 days Etomidate and septic shock Substudy of CORTICUS: corticotropin response and mortality in 96 adults receiving etomidate Higher portion of non responders in those receiving etomidate (61 vs 44.6%, p=0.004) Hydrocortisone administration did not change mortality in these non responders (45 vs 40%) Etomidate was associated with a higher mortality in patients with septic shock (p=0.02) Cuthbertson et al, Intensive Care Med 2009 Glycemic control Treat hyperglycemia with insulin after stabilization Suggest protocol with target glucose < 150 Large randomized adult trial showed a reduction in ICU mortality with intensive insulin targeting glucoses of 80 110 (Leuven protocol, NEJM 2001) More recent trials for aggressive control showed no benefit and had higher rates of hypoglycemia Glycemic control NICE SUGAR study, NEJM 2009 Trial of 6100 adult ICU patients randomized to intensive therapy (glucose 80 110) or conventional therapy (glucose <180) Mortality of 27.5% in the intensive therapy group vs 24.9% in the conventional therapy group Severe hypoglycemia of 6.8% in the intensive group vs 0.5% in the conventional group Glycemic control COIITSS study, JAMA 2010 Randomized trial of intensive vs conventional insulin therapy in 509 adults with septic shock who received hydrocortisone Compared with conventional therapy, intensive insulin therapy did not improve mortality Patients treated with intensive insulin had significantly more episodes of hypoglycemia 5

Mechanical ventilation Tidal volumes of 6 8 ml/kg and peak pressures 30 cm H 2 0 Elevated head of bed to 30 45 to limit risk of aspiration and ventilator associated pneumonia Recommend ventilator weaning protocol and spontaneous breathing trials Recommend sedation protocols Pediatric considerations Mortality much lower (10%) than in adults Boluses of 20ml/kg titrated to hemodynamics Use dopamine as initial pressor Pediatric patients may have variable CI and SVR Suggest tailoring pressor/inotropes to the patient Use epinephrine or norepinephrine if fails dopamine Hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock Practice parameters from the American College of Critical Care Medicine (Crit Care Med 2009) Address the following: Resuscitation goals for children Fluid resuscitation (proportionally more than adults) Inotropic, vasopressor, and vasodilator therapies Hydrocortisone for adrenal insufficiency ECMO for refractory shock Pediatric practice parameters Recommend that diagnosis of septic shock rely on clinical examination, but lactate may be useful Hemodynamic parameters and mortality Tachycardia/bradycardia (3%) Hypotension with cap refill <3 sec (5%) Normotension with cap refill >3 sec (7%) Hypotension with cap refill >3 sec (33%) Pediatric practice parameters Use cardiac output and perfusion pressure Urine output estimates adequacy of perfusion pressure in absence of invasive monitoring Multiple methods to measure cardiac output, but not routinely available and can be unreliable SvO 2 can estimate whether cardiac output meets tissue metabolic demands Validating SvO 2 use in pediatrics 102 children with septic shock treated by ACCM/PALS guidelines Half randomized to SvO 2 monitoring for first 6 hrs Volume, PRBCs, +/ inotropes to reach SvO 2 70 Lower 28 day mortality: 11.8 vs 39.2%, p=0.002 Lower incidence of new organ dysfunction as well Oliveira, et al, Intensive Care Med 2008 6

Pediatric practice parameters No advantage to colloids over crystalloids Blood transfusions Goal hemoglobin >10 in septic shock Vasopressors Typically recommend use of dopamine first line Agree with using norepinephrine alone with low SVR and wide pulse pressure, DBP < ½SBP Pediatric practice parameters 2002 guidelines discouraged use of vasoactive agents until central access was in place Newer guidelines recommend use of peripheral inotropes (not vasopressors) until central access is attained Low dose dopamine or epinephrine Obtain arterial access when able, but this should not delay use of vasopressors Bundled care for septic shock Prospective 2 year interventional study The second year added an early goal directed therapy protocol to ED management 79 patients pre intervention, 77 postintervention Patients in the post intervention year: Received significantly greater fluid volumes Had increased use of early vasopressors Had reduction in mortality (18% vs 27%) Jones A, et al, Chest 2007 Bundled care for septic shock Septic shock bundle used over 2 year period Initiate CVP/SvO 2 monitoring within 2 hrs Broad spectrum antibiotics within 4 hrs Complete early goal directed therapy within 6 hrs Give corticosteroids if indicated Monitor lactate clearance 330 total patients; mortality 20.8% if bundle completed vs 39.5% if not completed (p<0.01) Nguyen, et al, Crit Care Med 2007 Bundled care for septic shock Surviving Sepsis Campaign, Crit Care Med 2010 6 hr resuscitation and 24 hr management bundles Data collected from 2005 2008 for hospitals enrolled Data from 165 sites and over 15,000 patients analyzed Full bundle compliance increased from 10.9% initially to 31.3% by the end of two years Overall mortality decreased from 37% to 30.8% over two years (p=0.001), and survival improved the longer a center was in the campaign Bundled care for septic shock Meta analysis of 8 trials of bundled care for septic shock Sepsis bundles associated with a consistent increase in survival (odds ratio 1.91, p < 0.0001) All studies reported decreases in time to antibiotics and increased appropriateness of antibiotics All other elements were inconsistently reported Barochia, et al, Crit Care Med 2010 7

Pediatric Guidelines for Initial Management of Septic Shock Obtain cultures and start broad spectrum antibiotics within 1 hour (do not delay antibiotics for cultures) Recognize decreased mental status and perfusion Maintain or establish airway and IV access per PALS Fluid refractory shock: Start dopamine at 10 15mcg/kg/min; Arterial/central access as able Warm shock: Begin norepinephrine at 0.05 0.1mcg/kg/min and titrate to BP Aggressive fluid resuscitation with 20ml/kg boluses up to and over 60ml/kg Notify PICU if requiring >40ml/kg fluid resuscitation If at risk for adrenal insufficiency, consider baseline cortisol level and hydrocortisone with 100mg/m 2 loading dose Titrate pressors and give additional volume as needed Monitor CVP, arterial blood pressure, lactates, SvO2 Assess for and treat: Hxpoxia Hypoglycemia Hypocalcemia Consider elective intubation if persistent shock with respiratory distress Dopamine resistant shock: Assess pulses, capillary refill, and pulse pressure and add epinephrine or norepinephrine as indicated below OR Cold shock: Begin epinephrine at 0.05 0.1mcg/kg/min and titrate to BP Pediatric guidelines for initial management of septic shock Recognize decreased mental status and perfusion Maintain or establish airway and IV access per PALS Fluid challenges: 20cc/kg boluses up to and over 60cc/kg unless clinically worse due to fluids Obtain cultures and start broad spectrum antibiotics within 1 hour (do not delay for cultures) Assess for and treat hypoxia, hypoglycemia, and hypocalcemia Pediatric guidelines for initial management of septic shock Notify PICU if requiring > 40ml/kg in boluses Consider intubation for persistent shock and/or respiratory distress Fluid refractory shock: Start dopamine and obtain central and arterial access as able Consider norepinephrine alone for warm shock if central access is in place Pediatric guidelines for initial management of septic shock Dopamine resistant shock: Add epinephrine for cold shock or norepinephrine for warm shock If at risk for adrenal insufficiency, consider baseline cortisol level and give hydrocortisone 100mg/m 2 loading dose Titrate pressors; give additional volume as needed Monitor CVP, arterial blood pressure, lactates, and SvO 2 as able Quality Indicators Time to antibiotics Time to achieve CVP 8 Time to achieve adequate age adjusted BP Questions??? Time to achieve SvO2 70 8

References 1) Angus DC, Linde Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. Jul 2001;29(7):1303 10 2) Rivers E, et al. Early Goal Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345:1368 1377 3) Han YY, Carcillo JA, et al. Early reversal of pediatric neonatal septic shock by community physicians is associated with improved outcome. Pediatrics 2003; 112:793 799 4) Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines fir management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008, 36:296 327 5) Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood K, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1589 1596 6) Kumar A, Ellis P, Arabi Y, et al. Initiation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy results in a fivefold reduction of survival in human septic shock. Chest 2009; 136: 1237 1248 7) Bagshaw S, Lapinsky S, Dial S, et al. Acute kidney injury in septic shock: clinical outcomes and impact of duration of hypotension prior to initiation of antimicrobial therapy, Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:871 881 8) De Backer D, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. NEJM 2010; 362: 779 789 9) Myburgh J, et al. A comparison of epinephrine and norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 2226 2234 10) Russell J et al. Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. NEJM 2008; 358: 877 887 11) Annane D et al. Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock. NEJM 2002; 288: 862 871 12) Sprung C et al, Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock. NEJM 2008; 358: 111 124 References 13) Cuthbertson B et al. The effects of etomidate on adrenal responsiveness and mortality in patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1868 1876 14) Van Den Berghe G, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. NEJM 2001; 345: 1359 1367 15) NICE SUGAR study investigators. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. NEJM 2009; 360: 1283 1297 16) COIITSS study investigators. Corticosteroid treatment and intensive insulin therapy for septic shock in adults. JAMA 2010; 303: 341 348 17) Brierley J, Carcillo JA, et al. Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:666 681 18) Oliveira CF et al. ACCM/PALS hemodynamic support guidelines for pediatric septic shock: an outcomes comparison with and without monitoring central venous oxygen saturation. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 991 993 19) Jones A, et al. Prospective external validation of the clinical effectiveness of an emergency department based early goal directed therapy protocol for severe sepsis and septic shock. Chest 2007; 132: 425 432 20) Nguyen HB et al. Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 1105 1112 21) Levy M, Dellinger P, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guidelinebased performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 367 374 22) Barochia A, et al. Bundled care for septic shock: an analysis of clinical trials. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 668 678