Ray Matthews MD Professor of Clinical Medicine Chief of Cardiology University of Southern California

Similar documents
High Risk PCI for Heart Failure

TREATMENT OF HIGHER RISK PATIENTS INTRODUCTION TO PROTECTED PCI WITH IMPELLA. IMP v4

Impella Ins & Outs. CarVasz November :45 12:15

Who is the high risk patient?

Cardiogenic Shock Protocol

Management of High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease

Rationale for Left Ventricular Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Management of Acute Shock and Right Ventricular Failure

A National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative (CSI):

Rationale for Prophylactic Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Cath Lab Essentials : LV Assist Devices for Hemodynamic Support (IABP, Impella, Tandem Heart, ECMO)

COURSE OFFERINGS. Committed to Improving Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock and Protected PCI Through Excellence in Education.

Recovering Hearts. Saving Lives.

Circulatory Support: From IABP to LVAD

The Role of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: When to Utilize

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

8th Emirates Cardiac Society Congress in collaboration with ACC Middle East Conference Dubai: October Acute Coronary Syndromes

Matching Patient and Pump in the New Era of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support

Assist Devices in STEMI- Intra-aortic Balloon Pump

Mechanical Cardiac Support in Acute Heart Failure. Michael Felker, MD, MHS Associate Professor of Medicine Director of Heart Failure Research

Ventricular Assisting Devices in the Cathlab. Unrestricted

Right Ventricular Failure: Prediction, Prevention and Treatment

Counterpulsation. John N. Nanas, MD, PhD. Professor and Head, 3 rd Cardiology Dept, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

CLINICAL DOSSIER Protected PCI

Andrew Civitello MD, FACC

Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation- Supportive Data for a Role in Cardiogenic Shock ( Be Still My Friend )

Introduction to Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock. 24 th Annual San Diego Heart Failure Symposium Ryan R Reeves, MD FSCAI

Mitigating Operator Risk in Complex Interventional Procedures. Tanveer Rab, MD, FACC Ajay Kirtane, MD, FACC Prashant Kaul, MD, FACC

Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS): What Every Pharmacist Needs to Know!

Mechanics of Cath Lab Support Devices

The majority of patients with cardiomyopathy

Hardware in the Chest - From VADs to Valves

Mechanics of Cath Lab Support Devices

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock The Cardiologist s view ACCA Masterclass 2017

Ted Feldman, M.D., MSCAI FACC FESC

Case - Advanced HF and Shock (INTERMACS 1)

Cardiogenic Shock in Acute MI

Antonio Colombo. Centro Cuore Columbus and S. Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. Miracor Symposium. Speaker: 15. Parigi: May 16-19, 2017

How to do Primary Angioplasty. - Patients with Cardiogenic Shock

Management of Cardiogenic Shock. Dr Stephen Pettit, Consultant Cardiologist

2018 TCT Investor Update

Rhondalyn C. McLean. 2 ND YEAR RESEARCH ELECTIVE RESIDENT S JOURNAL Volume VII, A. Study Purpose and Rationale

ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction & Cardiogenic Shock. - What Should We Do?

The Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock Knowledge Gaps & Opportunities

Unprotected LM intervention

AllinaHealthSystem 1

headline a Protected PCI Program: Treating the Most Complex Patients

เอกราช อร ยะช ยพาณ ชย

Acute heart failure: ECMO Cardiology & Vascular Medicine 2012

Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Right Ventricular Support Devices

Useful? Definition of High-risk? Pre-OP/Intra-OP/Post-OP? Complication vs Benefit? Mortality? Morbidity?

Update on Mechanical Circulatory Support. AATS May 5, 2010 Toronto, ON Canada

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO

Extra Corporeal Life Support for Acute Heart failure

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

TCT mdbuyline.com Clinical Trial Results Summary

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis

Bridging With Percutaneous Devices: Tandem Heart and Impella

Echo assessment of patients with an ECMO device

Cath Lab Essentials: Basic Hemodynamics for the Cath Lab and ICU

CABG for ischemic cardiomyopathy, post myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock

Paris, August 28 th Gian Paolo Ussia on behalf of the CoreValve Italian Registry Investigators

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

VCU Pauley Heart Center: A 2009 US News Top 50 Heart and Heart Surgery Hospital

A case of post myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture CHRISTOFOROS KOBOROZOS, MD

APOLLO TMVR Trial Update: Case Presentation

LM stenting - Cypher

MCS for Acute Heart Failure Eric Adler MD Associate Professor of Medicine Medical Director Cardiac Transplant

Low cardiac output & Mechanical Support นายแพทย อรรถภ ม ส ศ ภอรรถ ศ ลยศาสตร ห วใจและทรวงอก โรงพยาบาล ราชว ถ

New Jersey Cardiac Catheterization Data Registry, Version 2.0 (Please report data only for patients 16 years or older.)

CIPG Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement- When Is Less, More?

Pre-operative usage of IABP for patients for by pass surgery

Impella Program. Protocols & Tools. Recovering hearts. Saving lives.

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

Cardiogenic Shock. Carlos Cafri,, MD

Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support for treatment and prevention of hemodynamic instability Engström, A.E.

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

Which mechanical assistance for cardiogenic shock?

ECMO as a bridge to durable LVAD therapy. Jonathan Haft, MD Department of Cardiac Surgery University of Michigan

The number of patients in the United States with

Update interventional Cardiology Hans Rickli St.Gallen

Valve Disease in Patients With Heart Failure TAVI or Surgery? Miguel Sousa Uva Hospital Cruz Vermelha Lisbon, Portugal

Introducing the COAPT Trial

Embolic Protection Devices for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Fractional Flow Reserve: Basics, FAME 1, FAME 2. William F. Fearon, MD Associate Professor Stanford University Medical Center

Valvular Intervention

The World s Smallest Heart Pump

Aortic Stenosis: Interventional Choice for a 70-year old- SAVR, TAVR or BAV? Interventional Choice for a 90-year old- SAVR, TAVR or BAV?

HOW IMPORTANT ARE THESE ECHO MEASUREMENTS ANYWAY?

TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION: PSCC EXPERIENCE DR HUSSEIN ALAMRI PSCC RIYADH

Non ST Elevation-ACS. Michael W. Cammarata, MD

Echocardiographic Structural Assessment Pre- LVAD

Catheter-based mitral valve repair MitraClip System

Guideline compliance, utilization trends

Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

ΑΙΤΙΑ ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗΣ ΓΙΑ ΝΟΣΗΛΕΙΑ ΑΝΔΡΑΣ

Edwards Sapien. Medtronic CoreValve. Inoperable FDA approved High risk: in trials. FDA approved

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

Transcription:

High Risk PCI Making Possible the Impossible Ray Matthews MD Professor of Clinical Medicine Chief of Cardiology University of Southern California

Disclosures Abiomed Research Support Consulting Agreement St Jude Medical Research Support Consulting Agreement

High Risk PCI 93 year old female with NSTEMI* Recurrent angina on medications Cath shows calcified distal left main bifurcation lesion Echo: EF 35% Anteroapical severe hypokinesis Surgical referral. suggest stenting * Protect II pateint

Principles of Impella Design Replicates Heart s Natural Function Inflow (ventricle) Outflow (aortic root) EDV, EDP AOP Flow O 2 Demand O 2 Supply Cardiac Power Output

IMPELLA HEART PUMP: HOW IT WORKS Placement in Left Ventricle Impeller and blood outflow 2.5 = 2.5 l/min CP = 4 l/min Animation Click here

HEMODYNAMICS OF IMPELLA IN AMI CARDIOGENIC SHOCK 6 Pressure Tracings, Harvi 1 Case Example* 49 Yrs, Male Cold, Clammy skin Tachycardia MAP 51 mmhg (61/44) Impella CP On Circulatory Support (Increased MAP) 72 mmhg (75/71) Cardiac Output: 3.3 L/min Wedge Pressure: 22 mmhg 75% Left main LVEDP 28 mmhg Ventricular Unloading (Reduced LVEDP) 20 mmhg MAP 51mmHg, LVEDP 28 mmhg Time (60 seconds) 1. Physiologic computational modeling, Am J Physiol 1991 * Not all patients will experience the same clinical outcomes or hemodynamic responses

PROTECT II Trial Design Patients Requiring Prophylactic Hemodynamic Support During Non-Emergent High Risk PCI on Unprotected LM/Last Patent Conduit and LVEF 35% OR 3 Vessel Disease and LVEF 30% IABP + PCI R 1:1 IMPELLA 2.5 + PCI Primary Endpoint = 30-day Composite MAE* rate Follow-up of the Composite MAE* rate at 90 days *Major Adverse Events (MAE) : Death, MI (>3xULN CK-MB or Troponin), Stroke/TIA, Repeat Revasc, Cardiac or Vascular Operation or Vasc. Operation for limb ischemia, Acute Renal Dysfunction, Increase in Aortic insufficiency, Severe Hypotension, CPR/VT, Angio Failure

PROTECT II MACCE** Per Protocol Population, N=426 Death, Stroke, MI, Repeat revasc. IABP IMPELLA Log rank test, p=0.04 **Using x8uln threshold for biomarkers or Q-wave for Peri-procedural MI (Stone et al Circulation 2001;104:642-647) 647) and 2xULN threshold for biomarkers for Spontaneous MI (Universal MI definition) 8

PROTECTED PCI INDICATION & SAFETY INFO. 9 INDICATION FOR USE The Impella 2.5 System is a temporary ( 6 hours) ventricular support device indicated for use during high risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed in elective or urgent, hemodynamically stable patients with severe coronary artery disease and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction, when a heart team, including a cardiac surgeon, has determined high risk PCI is the appropriate therapeutic option. Use of the Impella 2.5 System in these patients may prevent hemodynamic instability, which can result from repeat episodes of reversible myocardial ischemia that occur during planned temporary coronary occlusions and may reduce peri- and post-procedural adverse events. CONTRAINDICATIONS The Impella 2.5 is contraindicated for use with patients experiencing any of the following conditions: Mural thrombus in the left ventricle Presence of a mechanical aortic valve or heart constrictive device Aortic valve stenosis/calcification (equivalent to an orifice area of 0.6 cm2 or less) Moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (echocardiographic assessment graded as +2) Severe peripheral arterial disease precluding placement of the Impella 2.5 System POTENTIAL ADVERSE EVENTS Acute renal dysfunction, Aortic valve injury, Bleeding, Cardiogenic shock, Cerebral vascular accident/stroke, Death, Hemolysis, Limb ischemia, Myocardial infarction, Renal failure, Thrombocytopenia and Vascular injury In addition to the risks above, there are other WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS associated with the Impella 2.5. Visit www.protectedpci.com/hcp/information/isi to learn more.

Anatomy vs. CABG Risk When to choose supported PCI? 10 STS score SYNTAX score PROTECT II patients

High Risk PCI 73 year male NSTEMI Refractory recurrent angina ESRD S/P AVR with prosthetic valve restenosis Severely Calcified coronaries EF 35% STS for AVR/CABG = 28% mortality

High Risk PCI PCI desirable but calcification makes very difficult PCI in combination with valve in valve TAVR as staged procedure best option Planning long rotablator total runs due to severe calcification in the setting of reduced LV function and aortic stenosis

AV gradients: 63 mmhg max 33 mmhg mean Vmax 4.0 m/sec

Future Technologies pvad Smaller with higher flows Right sided support

*CAUTION HeartMate PHP Percutaneous Heart Pump is an investigational device and is limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. US-THO-05160487 Approved for US Use Only 29

HEARTMATE PHP PERCUTANEOUS HEART PUMP A NOVEL ACUTE MCS THERAPY Catheter-based percutaneous heart pump delivered through 14F introducer; expands to 24F when unsheathed Designed to deliver > 4 lpm of flow at low RPMs Breaking the Link Between Size and Flow* High Cannula Inlet Cannula Outlet Low Flow Rates (LPM) Coated Cannula Impeller IABP Smaller Impella 2.5 Impella CP Tandem Heart PHP Insertion Profile Impella 5.0 Larger *CAUTION HeartMate PHP Percutaneous Heart Pump is an investigational device and is limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. Seyfarth, Sibbing, et al. J Am Coll Cardiology. 2008;52(19):1584-1588. Impella and Tandem Heart estimates based on manufacturer labeling. HeartMate PHP Percutaneous Heart Pump estimates based on preclinical bench testing. Impella is a trademark of Abiomed, Inc. Tandem Heart is a trademark of Cardiac Assist, Inc. US-THO-05160487 Approved for US Use Only 30

HEARTMATE PHP PERCUTANEOUS HEART PUMP CLINICAL STUDY ACTIVITY Completed CE Mark study leading to approval in 2015 50 patients undergoing high-risk PCI (HRPCI) Primary endpoints: avoidance of major adverse events at 30 days, device and procedural success Pivotal US IDE underway 425 patients undergoing high-risk PCI Randomized 2:1 against Impella 2.5 *CAUTION HeartMate PHP Percutaneous Heart Pump is an investigational device and is limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. US-THO-05160487 Approved for US Use Only 31

IMPELLA RP Temporary RV Support for RV Infarction RV failure after durable VAD Post cardiotomy RV failure Massive pulm embolus Others 32

END