Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Repositionable Self-expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Suboptimal for

Similar documents
30-Day Outcomes Following Implantation of a Repositionable Self-Expanding Aortic Bioprosthesis: First Report From the FORWARD Study

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis

SAPIEN 3: Evaluation of a Balloon- Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve in High-Risk and Inoperable Patients With Aortic Stenosis One-Year Outcomes

Early Experience of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Results from the Intrepid Global Pilot Study

Ian T. Meredith AM. MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FCSANZ, FACC, FAPSIC. Monash HEART, Monash Health & Monash University Melbourne, Australia

Outcomes in the Commercial Use of Self-expanding Prostheses in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparison of the Medtronic CoreValve and

Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes at 30 Days with the SAPIEN 3 TAVR System in Inoperable, High-Risk and Intermediate-Risk AS Patients

For the SURTAVI Investigators

Early Experience of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Results from the Intrepid Global Pilot Study

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients:

TAVR in Intermediate Risk Populations /Optimizing Systems for TAVR

Edwards Sapien. Medtronic CoreValve. Inoperable FDA approved High risk: in trials. FDA approved

An Update on the Edwards TAVR Results. Zvonimir Krajcer, MD Director, Peripheral Intervention Texas Heart Institute at St.

Vascular complications of embolized core valve

30-day Outcomes of The CENTERA Trial a New Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve. Didier Tchétché, MD On Behalf of the CENTERA Investigators

1-YEAR OUTCOMES FROM JOHN WEBB, MD

After PARTNER 2A/S3i and SURTAVI: What is the Role of Surgery in Intermediate-Risk AS Patients?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic valve stenosis with the ACURATE neo2 valve system: 30-day safety and performance outcomes

CoreValve Evolut R Technology review and Clinical Results. Paul TL Chiam

One-year outcomes with the transcatheter LOTUS Edge Aortic Valve System

CIPG Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement- When Is Less, More?

Strokes After TAVR: Perspectives from the US CoreValve Trials

Aortic Valve Practice Guidelines: What Has Changed and What You Need to Know

Multicentre clinical study evaluating a novel resheatable self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve system

Is TAVR Now Indicated in Even Low Risk Aortic Valve Disease Patients

LOW RISK TAVR. WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

HOW IMPORTANT ARE THESE ECHO MEASUREMENTS ANYWAY?

The Clinical Evaluation of the Medtronic AVE Driver Coronary Stent System

Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis

Is TAVI ready for prime time in: - Intermediate risk patients? - Low risk patients?

Aortic Stenosis: Interventional Choice for a 70-year old- SAVR, TAVR or BAV? Interventional Choice for a 90-year old- SAVR, TAVR or BAV?

TAVR IN INTERMEDIATE-RISK PATIENTS

CoreValve in a Degenerative Surgical Valve

Nouvelles indications/ Nouvelles valves

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with Evolut-R

Aortic Stenosis and TAVR TARUN NAGRANI, MD INTERVENTIONAL AND ENDOVASCULAR CARDIOLOGIST, SOMC

Severe Aortic Valve Disease: TAVR in Four Ages and Four Etiologies Age 25 y/o Congenital, 50 y/o Bicuspid, 75 y/o Rheumatic, 100 y/o Degenerative

APOLLO TMVR Trial Update: Case Presentation

Lotus Valve System for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation/Replacement (TAVI/R) Evidence

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Current and Future Devices: How do They Work, Eligibility, Review of Data

Current Evidence in TAVI patients using ACURATE and LOTUS valves

TAVI: The Real Deal? Marc Pelletier, MD Head, Department of Cardiac Surgery New Brunswick Heart Centre

The FORMA Early Feasibility Study: 30-Day Outcomes of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapy in Patients with Severe Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation

Advance Publication by-j-stage

TAVR Cases. Disclosures 2/17/2018. February 17, :15 3:30 PM 15 min

Outcome of Next-Generation Transcatheter Valves in Small Aortic Annuli: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Comparison

Appropriate Use of TAVR - now and in the future. A Surgeon s Perspective. Neil Moat Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK

Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients

TAVR: Intermediate Risk Patients

TAVR SPRING 2017 The evolution of TAVR

The PROACT Trial: valve choice has changed

Igor Palacios, MD Director of Interventional Cardiology Massachusetts General Hospital Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School

How Do I Evaluate a Patient Being Considered for TAVR? Sunday, February 14, :00 11:25 PM 25 min

Joint Statement on clinical selection for Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) 1/8/2017 On behalf of BCS, SCTS and BCIS

TAVR: Echo Measurements Pre, Post And Intra Procedure

2/15/2018 DISCLOSURES OBJECTIVES. Consultant for BioSense Webster, a J&J Co. Aortic stenosis background. Short history of TAVR

Aortic Stenosis: Open vs TAVR vs Nothing

MITRAL (Mitral Implantation of TRAnscatheter valves)

Progress In Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation. Core-Valve and Cribier-Edwards Update

PORTICO CE TRIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE ST. JUDE MEDICAL PORTICO TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANT AND THE TRANSFEMORAL DELIVERY SYSTEM

Australia and New Zealand Source Registry Edwards Sapien Aortic Valve 30 day Outcomes

TAVR today: High Risk, Intermediate Risk Population, and Valve in Valve Therapy

Percutaneous Therapy for Calcific Mitral Valve Disease

TRANSCATHETER MITRAL VALVE IMPLANTATION FOR SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION: THE TENDYNE GLOBAL FEASIBILITY TRIAL 1 YEAR OUTCOMES

TAVI Technology and Procedural Changes

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) - 5 important lessons learnt from HK experiences Michael KY Lee

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. SSVQ November 23, 2012 Centre Mont-Royal 15:40

Edwards Transcatheter AVR: Have the Outcomes Changed after CE Approval?

TAVR-Update Andrzej Boguszewski MD, FACC, FSCAI Vice Chairman, Cardiology Mid-Michigan Health Associate Professor Michigan State University, Central

Pacemaker rates Second generation TAVI Devices

Le TAVI pour tout le monde?

Implications of Current TAVR Trials with Focus on Intermediate Risk

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

22/06/2017. Oxford City. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement 2017 guidelines. 1. First time I have heard about it. 2.

TAVI- Is Stroke Risk the Achilles Heel of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Repair?

Neal Kleiman, MD Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Institute

TAVR: Review of the Robust Data from Randomized Trials

Evolving and Expanding Indications for TAVR

Update on the CoreValve Experience

Incorporating the intermediate risk in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Tissue vs Mechanical What s the Data??

Debate: SAVR for Low-Risk Patients in 2017 is Obsolete AVR vs TAVI

Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Moderate Risk Patients: Implications for Determination of Equipoise in the Transcatheter Era

Update on a Tethered Transapical Device for TMVR Vinay Badhwar, MD

Supplementary Online Content

Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients

Guide Wires. Guide Wire Basics

Policy Specific Section: March 30, 2012 March 7, 2013

Really Less-Invasive Trans-apical Beating Heart Mitral Valve Repair: Which Patients?

Incidence and Management of Early Implant Failure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

NEXT-GENERATION TAVR. A look at the future of percutaneous valve replacement.

TAVI limitations for low risk patients

EVOLUT R FORWARD 30-DAY OUTCOMES PRESENTED AT THE TCT ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 31, 2016

Comments restricted to Sapien and Corevalve 9/12/2016. Disclosures: Core Lab contracts with Edwards Lifesciences, Middlepeak, Medtronic

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is considered investigational for all other indications.

Josep Rodés-Cabau, MD, on behalf of the ARTE investigators

TAVI After PARTNER-2 : The Hamilton Approach

Edwards' solution for patients suffering from tricuspid valve disease

Transcription:

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Repositionable Self-expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Suboptimal for Surgery: One-Year Results from the Evolut R US Pivotal Study Jeffrey J. Popma, MD, For the Evolut R US Clinical Study Investigators

Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. Financial Relationship Institutional Grants Institutional Grants Medical Advisory Board Institutional Grants Consultant; Non vested equity Institutional Grants Medical Advisory Board Company Medtronic Boston Scientific Direct Flow Medical Abbott Vascular 2

Background The Evolut R transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) is a self-expanding bioprosthesis that provides a low (14F equivalent) profile delivery system, conformable annular sealing, and the ability to re-sheath and reposition during deployment. 3

Objective To evaluate the one-year safety and efficacy of the Evolut R system for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patients deemed high or extreme risk for surgical aortic valve replacement 4

Evolut R System Catheter Delivery System 14Fr-equivalent profile Inline Sheath Capsule Loading System Transcatheter Valve Supra-annular design, optimized sealing 5

Evolut R Inclusion Criteria Severe aortic stenosis defined as an aortic valve area 1.0 cm 2 or aortic valve index 0.6 cm 2 /m 2 and either a mean aortic valve gradient > 40 mm Hg or a peak aortic valve velocity > 4.0 m/sec, at rest or with dobutamine NYHA II or greater Deemed at high or extreme surgical risk 6

Evolut R Exclusion Criteria Gastrointestinal hemorrhage precluding anticoagulation End state renal disease Left ventricular ejection fraction < 20% Recent percutaneous coronary or peripheral intervention Life expectancy < 1 year due to comorbidities 7

Evolut R Study Methods CT imaging for valve sizing and vascular access 23 mm, 26 mm and 29 mm Evolut R with perimeterbased diameters between 18 26 mm Local Heart Team that included cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology determined risk National Screening Committee to confirm eligibility Independent Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) CEC adjudicated VARC II definitions 8

Investigational Sites NYU-Langone Medical Center New York, NY J. Slater, M. Williams Columbia University Medical Center New York, NY I. George, S. Kodali Duke University Medical Center Durham, NC J. K. Harrison, G.C. Hughes University of Michigan Health Systems Ann Arbor, MI S. Chetcuti, G.M. Deeb Morristown Memorial Hospital Morristown, NJ J. Brown, R. Kipperman Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, MA K. Khabbaz, J. Popma Yale New Haven Hospital Haven, CT J. Forrest, A. Mangi Aurora St. Luke s Medical Center Milwaukee, WI T. Bajwa, D. O Hair Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital Dallas, TX E. Hebeler, R. Stoler Spectrum Health Hospitals Grand Rapids, MI J. Heiser, W. Merhi Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Houston, TX N. Kleiman, M. Reardon Riverside Methodist Hospital Columbus, OH D. Watson, S. Yakubov Washington Hospital Center Washington, DC C. Schults, R. Waksman University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh, PA T. Gleason, JS Lee St. Francis Hospital Roslyn, NY G. Petrossian, N. Robinson University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA R. Matthews, V. Starnes St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana Indianapolis, IN D. Heimansohn, J. Hermiller Pinnacle Health Wormleysburg, PA B. Maini, M Mumtaz University of Kansas Hospital Kansas City, KS P. Tadros, G. Zorn Detroit Medical Center Cardiovascular Group Detroit, MI S. Henry, T. Schreiber The Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore, MD J. Conte, J. Resar The Mount Sinai Health System New York, NY D. Adams, S. Sharma Banner Good Samaritan Phoenix, AZ T. Byrne, M. Caskey 9

Study Administration Co-Principal Investigators J. Popma, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston M. Williams, New York University-Langone, New York Screening Committee J. Conte, G.M. Deeb, T. Gleason, J. Popma, M. Reardon, M. Williams, S. Yakubov Echo Core Laboratory Chair: J. Oh, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN Data & Safety Monitoring Board J. L. Pomar, The Thorax Institut, Barcelona J. Tijssen, University of Amsterdam P. De Jaegere, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam Clinical Events Committee Chair: I. David, Holy Cross Hospital, Ft. Lauderdale Sponsor Medtronic 10

Patient Disposition Attempted Evolut R Implant N=241 30 Days N=233/233 (100%) 1- Year Evolut R N=198/213 (93.0%) Died-6 Exited-2 Died-16 Exited-4 11

Evolut R Baseline Characteristics Characteristic N = 241 Age, years 83.3 ± 7.2 Female, % 68.5 STS PROM, % 7.4 ± 3.4 NYHA Class III or IV, % 83.0 Previous CABG, % 23.2 Atrial fibrillation / atrial flutter, % 31.5 Diabetes mellitus, % 32.4 Chronic lung disease, % 54.0 Pre-existing PPI, % 16.6 Evolut 12 R 1 Year TCT2016 12

Evolut R Baseline Characteristics Characteristic N = 241 Severe aortic calcification, % 6.4 Frailty, % 69.7 Baseline Echocardiographic Findings Mean aortic valve gradient, mm Hg 48.6 ± 11.5 Maximal AV velocity, m/sec 4.5 Aortic valve area, cm 2 0.6 ± 0.2 Left ventricular ejection fraction, % 59.3 Evolut 13 R 1 Year TCT2016 13

Evolut R Procedural Outcomes Characteristic N = 241 General anesthesia, % 80.7 Iliofemoral access approach, % 89.5 Valve Size Implanted, % 23 mm 1.3 26 mm 35.0 29 mm 63.7 Pre-TAVR balloon dilation, % 36.8 Post-implant balloon dilation, % 32.5 NCS Implant depth, mm 4.0 ± 2.3 LCS Implant depth, mm 5.2 ± 2.3 14

Evolut R 30-Day Outcomes Characteristic N = 241 Coronary obstruction, % 0.4 (N=1) More than 1 valve implanted, % 1.3 (N=3) Total Aortic Regurgitation, % None 26.3 Trace 35.5 Mild 32.5 Moderate 5.7 Severe 0 15

Evolut R Valve Performance Effective Orifice Area, cm 2 Mean Gradient, mm Hg Gradient 237 222 223 183 EOA 211 198 205 157 16

Hemodynamics by Valve Size* Aortic-Valve Area, cm 2 AV Mean Gradient, mm Hg *Excluding 3 patients implanted with the 23 mm 17

Left Ventricular Mass, gm Left Ventricular Mass Regression 18

Percentage of Patients Evolut R New York Heart Association 19

Evolut R Paravalvular Regurgitation 20

Evolut R 1-Year Outcomes Outcome (KM rates) 30 Days 1 Year All-cause mortality, % 2.5 8.6 Cardiovascular mortality, % 2.5 7.0 All stroke, % 5.0 7.7 Disabling stroke, % 3.3 5.1 Non disabling stroke, % 1.7 3.9 TIA, % 0.8 1.7 All-cause mortality or disabling stroke, % 5.4 11.9 Evolut 21 R 1 Year TCT2016 21

Evolut R 1-Year Outcomes Outcome (KM rates) 30 Days 1 Year Major vascular complications, % 7.5 7.5 Life-threatening or disabling bleeding, % 7.1 9.3 Major bleeding, % 5.0 10.1 Permanent pacemaker implanted, % 16.4 18.2 There were no instances of embolization or migration, valve dysfunction requiring repeat procedure, endocarditis or valve thrombosis Evolut 22 R 1 Year TCT2016 22

Evolut R Expanded Size Range Evolut R 23 mm, 26 mm, 29 mm CE and FDA Approved Evolut R 34 mm FDA Approved 18 20 mm 20 23mm 23 26 mm Patient Annulus Diameter Range (mm) 26 30 mm 23

Evolut R Baseline Characteristics 34 mm Characteristic N = 15 Age, years 80.3 ± 8.1 Male, % 100 STS PROM, % 4.8 ± 2.2 NYHA Class III or IV, % 86.7 Previous CABG, % 26.7 Atrial fibrillation / atrial flutter, % 26.7 Diabetes mellitus, % 33.3 Chronic lung disease, % 66.7 Pre-existing PPI, % 13.3 24

Evolut R Procedural Outcomes 34 mm Characteristic, % N = 15 General anesthesia, % 60.0 Iliofemoral access approach, % 100 Pre-TAVR balloon dilation performed, % 73.3 Post implant dilation performed, % 46.7 More than 1 valve implanted, % 0 Coronary obstruction, % 0 Implant depth (non-coronary), % 5.7 ± 2.3 Implant depth (left), % 6.5 ± 2.6 25

Evolut R 30 Day Outcomes 34 mm Outcome (KM rates) N=15 All-cause mortality, % 0 All stroke, % 0 Major vascular complications, % 0 Life-threatening or disabling bleeding, % 0 Stage 2 or 3 AKI, % 0 Permanent pacemaker implanted, % 2 (13.3) Embolization or migration, % 0 Valve thrombosis, % 0 Repeat valve intervention, % 0 26

Evolut R Valve Performance 34 mm Effective Orifice Area, cm 2 Mean Gradient, mm Hg 27

Evolut R Paravalvular Regurgitation 34 mm 28

Evolut R Clinical Summary The Evolut R transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) is a self-expanding bioprosthesis that provides a low (14F equivalent) profile delivery system, conformable annular sealing, and the ability to re-sheath and reposition during deployment. Early 30-day clinical outcomes are sustained 1 year after the procedure with a low all-cause mortality (8.6%) and disabling stroke (5.1%) in patients deemed high or greater risk for surgery. FDA Approval for 34 mm Evolut XL 29