Influence of High-P-Chelated Micronutrients on Nutrient Uptake of Chickpea Under Vertisols

Similar documents
Effect of High-P-Chelated Micronutrient Foliar Spray on Yield and Quality of Chickpea

Effect of Micronutrients Application on Availability of Zn, Fe and B of Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) in Inceptisol

EFFECTS OF ZINC AND BORON ON YIELD, NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND ECONOMICS OF MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L.) IN MUSTARD-MAIZE CROPPING SEQUENCE

Multi-K. Potassium Nitrate Products For Healthy Crops

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 5, 2016,

Foliar Micronutrients for Broad Acre Crops Higher yield and better quality Balanced trace element supply for healthy crops Insurance against

Effect of Nutrient Combinations on Plant Pigments and Yield of Bt Cotton Under Rainfed Condition

Yield and quality of cumin as influenced by FYM enriched micronutrients

Nitrophoska. Cereals, fodder beet, horticulture, maize and vegetables. Precise nutrition for superior plant performance

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Assessment of Secondary and Micro Nutrient Status under Long-Term Fertilizer Experiment on Vertisol

Response of Zinc Fertilization to Wheat on Yield, Quality, Nutrients Uptake and Soil Fertility Grown In a Zinc Deficient Soil Keram, Komal Singh

The effect of nano-micronutrients seed priming on germinability of Kabuli chickpea

RESPONSE OF BIO FERTILIZERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH INORGANIC FERTILIZERS IN KHARIF PADDY

Amelia Agrochemical Products Available for Licensing PRODUCT LIST

Micronutrient status in soils of Shirpur tehsil of Dhule district (M.S.) India

Effect of nitrogen, zinc and boron on growth, yield attributes and yield of wheat under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh

STUDIES ON IMPACT OF UREA, THIOUREA AND ZINC APPLICATION ON GROWTH YIELD QUALITY AND ECONOMIC OF WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.)

Specialists In Soil Fertility, Plant Nutrition and Irrigation Water Quality Management.

How to Develop a Balanced Program for Pecan and Chili. Robert R Smith

Vitanica Ferro Top. fluid. Liquid Fertilizer for Turf COMPO EXPERT EXPERTS FOR GROWTH

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED

Water Soluble Fertilizer for Foliar Application

INTRODUCTION TO GCiC

FOLIAR NUTRITION, BIOSTIMULANTS, SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, SURFACTANTS, ADYUVANTS, WETTING AGENTS, AND SOIL AMENDMENT TECNOLOGY

Evaluation of Suitable Nutrient Management on Dual Purpose Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Crop under New Alluvial Zone (NAZ) of West Bengal, India

EconovaPlus Fertiliser

EFFECT OF SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATIONS OF ZINC AND IRON ON THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF ONION (Allium cepa L.) Abstract

Available online at

Stoller s Options and Timings for Increasing Tuber Numbers in Potatoes

Essential Soil Nutrients for Plant Growth and Development

Terry Richmond s Fertilizer Package mentioned in the panel discussion March 14, 2013.

Nutrition. Grain Legume Handbook

Effect of ammonia gas and some micronutrients by different methods on yield characters and micronutrients contents maize plants (Zea mays).

Eeffect of biofertilizers and foliar application of organic acids on yield, nutrient uptake and soil microbial activity in soybean

Assessment of Soil Properties of Central Farm - B - Block of MKV, Parbhani

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Volume 3, No 1, Copyright by the authors - Licensee IPA- Under Creative Commons license 3.

Fetrilon Combi 1/ Fetrilon Combi 2/ Hortrilon

Soil Nutrients and Fertilizers. Essential Standard Explain the role of nutrients and fertilizers.

NUTRITION KNOW-HOW P.O. BOX 897 // WILLMAR, MN (800) // WCDST.COM

Soil Program Recommendation

ELEGANT AGRO ELEGANT AGRO

Care Chemicals & Formulators. Librel BMX. Technical Information. = Registered trademark of BASF group Multi-Micronutrient EDTA Chelate.

Effect of different application method of humic acid on nodulation and seed yield of soybean

Chapter 1: Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management

Response of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) to Various Levels of Nitrogen and Potassium at Different Crop Growth Stages

Enclosed are the tissue analysis results for the samples from the greens at Golf Club.

Indo Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IAJMR) ISSN:

Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences e-issn Bhanderi BM et al.; Sch J Agric Vet Sci 2014; 1(4A):

2009 Elba Muck Soil Nutrient Survey Results Summary, Part III: Calcium, Magnesium and Micronutrients

BOTANY AND PLANT GROWTH Lesson 9: PLANT NUTRITION. MACRONUTRIENTS Found in air and water carbon C oxygen hydrogen

UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS BY WHEAT AS INFLUENCED BY LONG- TERM PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION

Dynamics of potassium fractions in a calcareous Vertic Haplustepts under AICRP-LTFE soils

SOLUFEED WATER SOLUBLE FERTILISERS

Soil fertility status and nutrient recommendations based on soil analysis of Jaisalmer district of western Rajasthan

Greenhouse Horticulture

Supplying Nutrients to Crops

Estimating Micronutrient Status and their Relationship with Other Soil Properties of Rewa District in Fiji

Journal of Applied and Natural Science 6 (2): (2014)

Potassium and Phosphorus as Plant Nutrients. Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. Potassium is required in large amounts by many crops

Management of Coriander Wilt (Fusarium oxysporium) through Cultural Practices as Organic Amendments and Date of Sowing

Animal, Plant & Soil Science. D3-7 Characteristics and Sources of Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients

Effect of Foliar Application of Micronutrients on Growth Parameters in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.)

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

Understanding a Soil Report

Yves Kessler European Turf Management. pro line. The new generation of biofertilizers. The.key for your quality turfgrass!

REMEMBER as we go through this exercise: Science is the art of making simple things complicated!

Effect of FYM, biofertilizers and zinc on phosphorus uptake by maize

Fluid Sources for Micronutrients Starters for No-Tillage Corn and Soybean in Argentina. Ricardo Melgar

Mineral Nutrition of Fruit & Nut Trees. Fruit & Nut Tree Nutrition 3/1/2013. Johnson - Nutrition 1

AGRIFLUIDS. Soluble Fertiliser. n k p

Micronutrient Management. Dorivar Ruiz Diaz Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management

Micronutrition On-Demand

Effect of N, Zn and Fe application on N, P, K content and total uptake in parmal rice (Oryza sativa L.)

AGNES KTS (0-0-25)+SO3 42% Liquid T.C. Ministry of Agriculture License No.: 588 / Registration No.: 14627

Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on growth and yield of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.)

Nutrient Use Strategies for Coconut Based Cropping System in Onattukara Sandy Tract, Kerala

THOMSON & JOSEPH LTD. The Mineral Specialists GRASS SILAGE EARLY SEASON MINERAL PROFILE

SOIL AND PLANT NUTRITION

TNPSC Chemistry Study Material Fertilizers

Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Innovation. Quality. Solutions.

Fertilization Programming

Fertilizer. Fertilizers. (FAO press release, April 1990): Nutrient Depletion. Nutrient Depletion 4/16/2012

Micro Nutrient Evaluation in Soils of Jhabua District of Madhya Pradesh

Product Guide

Importance of fertigation scheduling

Barley and Sugarbeet Symposium

A Comparative Study of Various Physical and Chemical Parameters of the Soils of Kutch District

By Andrew & Erin Oxford, Bethel

Biofortified pearl millet cultivars to fight iron and zinc deficiencies in India

A good starter feed for balanced growth. Reliable for most crops and situations. PRODUCT CODE 125.GB0173

Nutrition of Horticultural Crops. Monica Ozores-Hampton University of Florida/IFAS/SWFREC Spring 2013

Effect of Boron and Sulphur Application on Plant Growth and Yield Attributes of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

WHAT ARE FERTILIZERS

Effect of Iron Application and Rhizobium Inoculation on Uptake of Nutrients in Grain and Stover of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Potassium Supplying Capacity of Representative Soil Series of Sub-Montane Zone of Maharashtra, India

FERTIGATION 24 FERTIGATION WITH DRIPPERS

Role of Potassium and Sulphur on the Growth, Yield and Oil Content of Soybean (Glycine max L.)

Ni and N sources (Urea and ammonium sulphate) affecting growth, yield and quality in maize plant (Zea mays)

Transcription:

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURE ISSN : 0254-8755 available at http: www.serialsjournal.com Serials Publications Pvt. Ltd. Volume 35 Number 3 2017 Influence of High-P-Chelated Micronutrients on Nutrient Uptake of Chickpea Under Vertisols Deshmukh M S 1, Zade S P 1, Gourkhede P.H. 1* and Inamke P S 1 1 Department of Soil Science and Agriculture Chemistry, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, 431401, Maharashtra, (India) * Corresponding author. E-mail: pathrikar2012@gmail.com Abstract: Experiment was conducted to study the influence of high-p-chelated micronutrient on nutrient uptake pattern of chickpea. The experiment was conducted on experimental farm of Department of soil science and Agricultural Chemistry Vansantrao Naik Marathawada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, during 2009 1 0 and 2010 1 1. The application of RDF + Mangala 3X@3ml/L (2 sprays) at 30 showed marginally higher increase in available N, P and K in soil throughout the growing period of the crop. The maximum availability of micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu) was observed with RDF + Grade 2@ 5 g/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 and RDF + Mangala 3X@3ml/L (2 sprays) at 30 and 45 DAS. The higher N, P, and K concentration in plant were recorded with treatments receiving RDF + Mangala 3X@3ml/L (2 sprays) at 30. Micronutrients concentration in plant was observed maximum with treatment RDF + Grade 2@ 5 g/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45. The highest uptake of N, P, K was noticed in RDF + Mangala 3X@3ml/L (2 sprays) at 30 and higher uptake of micronutrients ( Zn, Fe, Mn,and Cu ) was noticed in RDF + Grade 2@ 5 g/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 and 60 DAS. Key words: Nutrient uptake, chickpea, high-p-chelated micronutrient, vertisols. INTRODUCTION Chickpea is one of the major rabi pulse crop which has high digestible dietary protein (17.21%) and carbohydrate (55%). It is also a good source of calcium, iron and vital Vitamin like A, B1, B2, B3, C, D, E and K. The leaves of chickpea contain malic acid which is very useful for stomach ailments and blood purification. In addition to, rich source of 713 International Journal of Tropical Agriculture

Deshmukh M S, Zade S P, Gourkhede P.H. and Inamke P S protein, it also maintain soil fertility through biological nitrogen fixation and thus play a vital role in sustaining agriculture. The phosphorus content in most Indian soil are low. Motsara (2002) reported that 60 per cent soils are low to medium in soil available P content. Consequently, large amounts of phosphatic fertilizers are needed to achieve reasonable crop yield. Foliar fertilization is the most efficient way to increase yield and research finding revealed that, foliar feeding can increase the yield from 12 to 25 per cent when compared to conventional fertilization. Pandragni et al. (1991) conducted field experiment to study the response of green gram to soil and foliar application of phosphatic fertilizers. It was observed that, the nutrient uptake of N (164.2 kg ha 1 ), P (20.6 kg ha 1 ) and K (89.8 kg ha 1 ) was significantly higher with 40 kg P ha 1 (soil application) + 0.5 per cent P (foliar) applied through SSP. Foliar feeding is a technique of feeding plants by applying liquid fertilizer directly to their leaves. For intensive high yield and quality crop production, the best ever answer to this challenge is Foliar spray nutrition, where soluble fertilizers are delivered to crop through foliar spray feeding system and thus ensure plant nutrients such as N, P, K and micronutrients are directed to the plant through foliage in well proportion. It is a well-established tool to supplement and to enrich plant nutrition. Hence this experiment is carried out to find the influence of high-p-chelated micronutrient on nutrient uptake pattern of chickpea under Vertisols. MATERIALS AND METHODS 1. Site and Location The experiment was conducted at Departmental Research Farm of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. Geographically, Parbhani district is situated in the Godawari drainage basin in the central part of the India between 76 46 East longitude and 19 16 North latitude having elevation of 410 m above the mean sea level in Marathwada division of Maharashtra state. The region has a semi-arid climate. It is under assured monsoon rainfall agro climatic zone with an average annual precipitation of 918 mm. The major portion of precipitation (75 per cent) being received through South-West monsoon from June to September. The mean maximum temperature varies from 26.9 C in winter to 42.4 C in summer and the mean minimum temperature varies from 5.8 C to 25.6 C. The climate is suitable for rabi crop like chickpea, sorghum and safflower. The soils of the region are medium (Inceptisol) to deep black (Vertisol). 2. Field Experimental Details After completion of preparatory tillage operations, the experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design comprising eight (8) treatments replicated three times (Table 3). Recommended dose of fertilizer was applied to the crop (25:50:00 kg NPK ha 1 ). Details of experiment 1. Year of experiment : 2013 2. Season of experiment : Rabi 3. Crop : Chickpea 4. Variety : Akash 5. Design of experiment : Randomized block design 6. Number of treatment : Eight 7. Number of replication : Three 8. Plot size : 4.5 3.6 m 2 9. Spacing : 45 10 cm 2 10. Method of sowing : Line sowing 11. RDF : 25:50:00 kg NPK ha 1 International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 714

12. Date of sowing : 9 November, 2012 13. Date of harvesting : 2 nd March, 2013 14. Plant protection : As per recommenmeasures dations 3. Treatment Details Eight treatments were formulated to evaluate the Studies on influence of high-p chelated micronutrient foliar spray on growth, yield and uptake of chickpea. The details of the treatment are as follows. The foliar sprays were taken up at 30, 45 and 60 days after sowing. Treatment details T1 T2 T3 Absolute Control (No Fertilizers) Only RDF through soil (25:50:0 NPK kg/ha) RDF + water spray T4 RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 T5 RDF + Mangala 3X@4 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 T6 RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/l (3 sprays) at 30,45 T7 RDF + Mangala 3X@4 ml/l (3 sprays) at 30,45 T8 RDF + Grade 2@ 5 g/l (3 sprays) at 30,45 Where, RDF = 25:50:00 NPK kg/ha, Grade 2 = Multimicronutrient notified grade for foliar application (Zn-3%, Fe-2.5%, Mn 1 %, Cu 1 %, B-0.5%, Mo-0.1%) 4. Fertilizer Application The recommended dose of fertilizer was (25:50:00 kg NPK ha 1 ) was applied to seven treatments in experimental period. The nitrogen and phosphorus were applied through urea (46 per cent N), and single super phosphate (16 per cent P 2 O 5 ), respectively. Entire dose of nitrogen and phosphorus was applied at the time of sowing. Mangala and grade II were applied to the crop at 30, 45 and 60 days after sowing. 5. Uptake of Nutrients Nutrient uptake i.e. uptake of N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn was calculated by considering grain and dry matter yield at harvest in relation to concentration of the particular nutrient in respective plot using the formula. Uptake (kg ha 1 ) = Nutrient content (%) (Grain/dry matter yield (kg ha 1 ) RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Nutrient uptake as influenced by different macro and micronutrient foliar application under rainfed condition have been studied and these finding are presented and discussed briefly under the following heads. 1. Effect of foliar application of high phosphorus chelated micronutrient on uptake of N, P, K and S in plant and grain of chickpea at harvest stage. 2. Effect of foliar application of high phosphorus chelated micronutrient on uptake of Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn in plant and grain of chickpea at harvest stage. Effect of Foliar Application of High Phosphorus Chelated Micronutrient on Uptake of N, P, K and S in Plant and Grain of Chickpea at Harvest Stage N Uptake The data showed in Table 1 indicated plant uptake of N varied in the range from 53.23 to 87.51 kg ha 1, 52.92 to 85.10 kg ha 1, and 49.65 to 82.56 kg ha 1 at flowering, pod development and at harvest stage, respectively. Scrutiny of the data revealed that, the nitrogen uptake by chickpea was relatively higher due to foliar application of high P chelated micronutrient. 715 International Journal of Tropical Agriculture

The maximum uptake of nitrogen was recorded in treatment T4 (RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 ) which were at par with treatment T7 (RDF + Mangala 3X@4 ml/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 ). The minimum uptake was seen in treatment T1 (Control) Similar type of results was observed by Hanan et al., (2012) and El-Fouly et al. (2012) concluded that, the treatment of NPK based on soil testing plus foliar application of micronutrients resulted in improving nutrient concentration in maize leaves. This might be due to increasing plant physiological processes which led to more nutrient absorbance by the plant. P uptake The data presented on Table 1 revealed that, the phosphorus uptake by chickpea as affected by foliar spray high P chelated micronutrient and showed that, the uptake of phosphorus was significantly increased over control. The phosphorus uptake in plant varied in the range of 11.06 to 18.98 kg ha 1, 09.89 to 17.21 kg ha 1, 08.33 to 13.56 kg ha 1 at flowering, pod development and at harvest stage respectively and in grain it was ranged between 13.92 to 25.82 kg ha 1. The maximum uptake of phosphorus was recorded in treatment T4 (RDF + Mangala 3X-3 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 ) followed by T7 (RDF + Mangala 3X-4 ml/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 and 60 DAS), which were at par with each other and significantly superior over all other treatments at flowering, pod development and at harvest stage respectively. The minimum uptake of phosphorus was observed in treatment T1 (Control). The results are in conformity with the finding of Yuncai et al., (2008) they reported the foliar fertilization increased uptake of K, Ca, Mg and P elements, which may be attributed to decreased transpiration. K uptake The data represent Table 1 on potassium uptake by chickpea are affected by the application of different high P chelated micronutrient foliar spray and noticed Deshmukh M S, Zade S P, Gourkhede P.H. and Inamke P S that, the uptake of potassium was significantly increased in treatment T4 (RDF + Mangala 3X-3 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30. The potassium uptake in grain ranged between 8.64 to 22.40 kg ha 1 and in plant it ranged from 23.76 to 51.75 kg ha 1, 23.31 to 49.21 kg ha 1 and 22.09 to 22.40 kg ha 1 at flowering, pod development and at harvest stage respectively and in grain it was ranged from 8.64 to 22.40 kg ha 1. The maximum uptake of potassium was recorded in treatment T4 (RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 ) followed by treatment T7 (RDF + Mangala 3X@4 ml/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 ) and were at par with each other at flowering stage and significantly superior over all other treatments. The minimum uptake of potassium was observed in treatment T1 (control). The similar findings were also reported by Khan et al. (2010). The integrated application of N, P and K in wheat recorded highest uptake of these elements in straw and grain. S uptake The data represent Table 1 regarding uptake of sulphur as influenced by foliar application of high P chelated micronutrient. The total uptake of sulphur varied in the range from 11.99 to 20.51, 9.45 to 19.19 and 8.91 to 15.55 kg ha 1 at flowering, pod development and at harvest stage respectively in plant and in grain 26.70 to 46.75 kg ha 1 in treatment T4 (RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 ) followed by treatment T7 (RDF + Mangala 3X@4 ml/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 ) which were at par with each other and significantly superior over all other treatments. The minimum uptake of sulphur was noticed in treatment T1 i.e. control. The timely foliar application of nutrients coincides with the flowering and seed setting of the crop, when nutrient requirement of the crop is higher. This might be the reason for higher uptake of nutrients. Similar results were also recorded by Pandrangi et al (1991). International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 716

Table 1 Effect of foliar application of high phosphorus chelated micronutrient on uptake of Nutrients (kg ha 1 ) in plant and grain of chickpea at harvest stage N Uptake P Uptake K Uptake S Uptake Tr. No. Treatment Plant Grain Plant Grain Plant Grain Plant Grain T1 Control 49.65 44.08 08.33 13.92 22.09 8.64 8.91 26.70 T2 Only RDF through soil (25:50:0 NPK kg/ha) 55.35 46.01 09.43 14.35 28.14 9.85 9.39 33.53 T3 RDF + water spray 63.45 53.07 10.39 16.72 34.80 12.77 11.31 36.16 T4 RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 and 82.56 74.97 13.56 25.82 44.25 22.40 15.55 46.75 45 DAS T5 RDF + Mangala 3X@4 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 and 72.32 65.31 11.77 18.66 35.47 16.06 12.25 41.02 45 DAS T6 RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 75.97 66.07 12.03 22.25 40.29 19.78 14.40 43.58 T7 RDF + Mangala 3X@4 ml/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 79.99 72.06 12.62 23.59 41.37 20.36 14.94 44.60 T8 RDF + Grade 2@5 g/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 and 70.71 61.54 10.80 17.92 35.55 15.83 14.05 39.26 60 DAS SE(m) ± 1.13 2.90 0.28 0.35 0.57 0.37 0.48 0.67 CD (0.05) 3.42 9.60 0.86 1.07 1.73 1.12 1.46 2.05 Effect of foliar application of high phosphorus chelated micronutrient on uptake of Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn in plant and grain of chickpea at harvest stage. Cu uptake The data represented in table 2 on uptake of Cu varied from 61.24 to 76.54 g ha 1 at harvest stage in plant and in grain it was ranged between 14.12 to 22.24 g ha 1 The maximum uptake of Cu was recorded in treatment T8 (RDF +Grade 2@5 g/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 ) and treatment T4 (RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 and 45 DAS) was at par with T8 and significantly superior over all other treatments. The minimum cu uptake was recorded in treatment T1. The micronutrient uptake was lower in treatments supplied with only RDF. Foliar application of these nutrients can increase macro and micronutrient balance in grain and straw as reported by Shaaban (2001) and Aref (2012). Fe uptake The results obtained from table 2 indicated that, the Fe uptake was influenced by foliar application to high P chelated micronutrient which was varied from 122.63 to 152.86 g ha 1, 121.77 to 144.53 g ha 1 and 121.43 to 137.51 g ha 1 at flowering, pod development and at harvest stage in plant respectively and in grain it was ranged between 86.94 to 121.23 g ha 1. The maximum uptake of Fe was recorded in treatment T8 (RDF + Grade 2@5 gm/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 ) and was at par with treatment T4 (RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 ) and significantly superior over all other treatments. The minimum uptake of Fe in plant was recorded in treatment T1 (Control). Similar results was obtained by Yassen et al. (2010) and reported that, the efficiency of foliar feeding is suitable for the supply of required nutrient which goes directly to the location of the high demand in leaves and its relatively quick absorption shows positive systems in plants. 717 International Journal of Tropical Agriculture

Deshmukh M S, Zade S P, Gourkhede P.H. and Inamke P S Table 2 Effect of foliar application of high phosphorus chelated micronutrient on uptake of Micronutrients (g ha 1 ) in plant and grain of chickpea at harvest stage Cu Uptake Fe Uptake Mn Uptake Zn Uptake Tr. No. Treatment Plant Grain Plant Grain Plant Grain Plant Grain T1 Control 61.24 14.12 121.43 86.94 145.93 82.35 129.23 93.60 T2 Only RDF through soil (25:50:0 NPK kg/ha) 61.85 15.80 124.15 97.04 147.99 85.31 134.37 106.96 T3 RDF + water spray 62.16 16.34 126.53 106.82 156.73 95.68 133.25 119.03 T4 RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 75.88 21.20 136.48 120.65 166.40 121.71 141.66 126.12 T5 RDF + Mangala 3X@4 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 64.63 18.24 130.84 114.07 159.61 116.28 137.81 122.41 T6 RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/l (3 sprays) at 71.60 19.12 133.20 113.68 163.05 118.95 138.24 123.64 30, 45 T7 RDF + Mangala 3X@4 ml/l (3 sprays) at 72.32 21.93 135.04 119.75 164.62 119.48 140.65 124.52 30, 45 T8 RDF + Grade 2@5 g/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 76.54 22.25 137.21 121.23 167.44 122.62 142.87 127.07 SE(m) ± 2.52 4.12 2.52 2.12 3.26 3.58 4.02 3.35 CD (0.05) 7.53 12.67 7.59 6.43 9.89 10.80 12.18 10.17 Mn uptake The data presented in table 2 indicated that, the Mn uptake was influenced by high P chelated micronutrient spray and it was varied from 151.30 to 178.92 g ha 1, 150.94 to 176.98 g ha 1 and 145.93 to 167.44 g ha 1 at flowering, pod development and at harvest stage in plant respectively and in grain it was ranged between 82.35 to 122.62 g ha 1. The maximum uptake of Mn was recorded in treatment T8 (RDF + Grade 2@5 g/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 and 60 DAS) followed by T4 (RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 ), T7 (RDF + Mangala 3X@4 ml/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 and 60 DAS) followed by T6 (RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/ L (2 sprays) at 30, 45 ) and T4 and at par with T8 at flowering stage in plant. The minimum uptake of Mn was noticed in treatment T1 (Control). Foliar application of Fe, Mn, and Zn significantly increased plant height and nutrients uptake of maize as reported by Hanan et al. (2012). Zn uptake The data presented in table 2 indicated that, the uptake of Zn varied from 132.51 to 145.27 g ha 1, 130.02 to 144.12 g ha 1 and 129.23 to 142.87 g ha 1 at flowering, pod development and at harvest stage in plant respectively. In grain, it was ranged from 93.60 to 127.07 g ha 1. The maximum uptake of Zn was recorded in treatment T8 (RDF + Grade 2@ 5 g/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 ) followed by T4 (RDF + Mangala 3X@3 ml/l (2 sprays) at 30 ) which were at par with each other and significantly superior over rest of the treatment in both grain and plant. The lowest uptake was recorded in treatment T1 (control). Increased uptake of micronutrients was due to foliar application of same nutrient possibly due to nutrients applied through foliage would have easily absorbed and translocated in plant without any loss. Similar results were reported by Patel et al. (2009). International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 718

CONCLUSIONS The N, P, K and S uptake in straw and grain significantly increased with the application of RDF + Mangala 3X@3ml/L (2 sprays) at 30. While, micronutrient uptake in straw and grain significantly increased with the application of RDF + Grade 2@5 g/l (3 sprays) at 30, 45 which was followed by treatment receiving RDF + Mangala 3X@4ml/L (3 sprays) at 30, 45. REFERENCES Aref Farshid (2012), Manganese, iron and copper contents in leaves of maize plants (Zea mays L.) grown with different boron and zinc micro nutrients. African J. of Biotechnology, 11(4): 896-903. El-Fouly, M.M., El-Nour, Abou. E.A.A, Shaaban S.H.A., Zeidan, M.S. (2012), Effect of different levels of NPK and micronutrients fertilizer on yield and nutrient uptake of maize plants. Afr. J. Plant Sci., 5(5): 209-213 http://www.americanscience.org. Hanan, Siam, S., Mona, G., El-Kader Abd El-Fattah Abd M.S. (2012), Effect of ammonia gas and some micronutrients on maize plants (Zea mays) I-Plant growth and mineral uptake. Aus. J. Basic Applied Sci. 6(3): 462-473. Khan, M.B., Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Shahnawaz and Ghulam Shabir (2010), Foliar application of micronutrients improves wheat yield and net return. International J. Agri. & Bio., 12(6): 953-956. Palaniappan, S.P., Jeyabal, A. and Chellian, S. (1999), Response of tomato and chilli to foliar application of specialist fertilizers. Veg. Sci., 26(2): 198-200. Pandrangi, R.B., Wankhede, S.G. Nasre, R.A. (1991), Response of mung to soil of foliar application of phosphoric fertilizer. Legume Res., 14(4): 187-188. Patel, K.P., Patel, G.J. Patel, K.C. and Ramani, V.P. (2009), Effect of multi-micronutrient application on yield and their uptake by maize (Zea mays L.) of middle Gujarat region. Indian J. Dryland Agric. Res. and Dev. 24(1): 45-51. Shaaban, M.M. (2001), Effect of trace-nutrient foliar fertilizer on nutrient balance, growth, yield and yield components of two cereal crops. Pak J. Bio Sci., 4(7): 770-774. Yucani, H.U., Zoltan B., Schmidhalter U. (2008), Effect of foliar fertilization application on the growth and mineral nutrient content of maize seedlings under drought and salinity. Soil Sci. and Plant Nutrition. 54: 133-141. 719 International Journal of Tropical Agriculture