Client: PHENICOPTERE SP. Z O.O. ul. Nowogrodzka 18a/21 00-511 Warszawa Sample (according to declaration of the Client) EYE MAKE-UP REMOVAL GLOVE Sample received on: 06.03.2015 Analysis completed on: 08.04.2015 Report date: 16.04.2015 REPORT OF USE TEST UNDER DERMATOLOGIST AND OPHTHALMOLOGIST CONTROL Page 1 / 24
SCOPE OF TESTS COMPLIANT WITH: Technical Instruction applicable at the J.S. Hamilton Poland S.A. IT-01/PK. Technical Instruction applicable at the J.S. Hamilton Poland S.A. IT-03/PK Technical Instruction applicable at the J.S. Hamilton Poland S.A. IT-14/PK. Technical Instruction applicable at the J.S. Hamilton Poland S.A. IT-16/PK. Page 2 / 24
CONTENT OF THE REPORT: 1. Subject of the test. 2. Basis for conducting the test. 3. Intended use of the product. 4. Purpose of the test. 5. Dates of performance of the study. 6. Description of volunteers. 7. Testing methodology. 8. Results: 8.1. DERMATOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OPINION AND INTERPRETATION. 8.2. OPHTHALMOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OPINION AND INTERPRETATION. 8.3. USE TEST EVALUATION OPINION AND INTERPRETATION. 9. Conclusion. Page 3 / 24
1. SUBJECT OF THE TEST: No. Parameter Description 1. Appearance Microfibre glove 2. Color Cream-white colored 3. Fragrance Odorless 4. Packaging Transparent foil. 2. BASIS FOR THE CONDUCTING THE TEST: 2.1. THE MICROBIOLOGICAL TEST RESULT: Negative results of microbiological test of the product conducted at SkinLab Sp. z o.o. performed on 11.02.2013. Report no: 632/2013. 2.2. THE DERMATOLOGICAL TEST RESULT: Negative result of dermatological test of the product (no positive reactions in extended contact test) conducted at SkinLab Sp. z o.o. performed on 04.03.2013. Report no: 2/01/13/D. 3. INTENDED USE OF THE PRODUCT: The product is to be used for make-up remover. 4. PURPOSE OF THE TEST: The test is designed to assess the product properties in order to confirm the skin acceptability and obtain the ophthalmologist opinion on the product. Page 4 / 24
5. DATE OF PERFORMANCE OF THE STUDY: 25.03.15 08.04.15 6. DESCRIPTION OF VOLUNTEERS: The volunteers were selected for the test in accordance with Technical Instruction applicable at the J.S. Hamilton Poland S.A. IT-14/PK. Total number of volunteers: 15 Age: 24 42 Gender: 100,00% women Skin type : 53,33% mixed, : 33,33% dry, : 13,33% normal, including: : 73,33% sensitive, prone to and allergies, : 26,66% capillaries, : 6,66% atopic. Type of make-up remover products used previously: : 80,00% - micellar fluid, : 26,66% - cleansing gel, : 26,66% - cleansing foam, : 46,66% - milk, : 6,66% - oil, : 6,66% - soap, : 6,66% - biphasic fluid, : 6,66% - cream. Page 5 / 24
Negative attributes of make-up remover: : 46,66% - takes a long time : 60,00% - irritates the skin or eyes : 13,33% - is unpleasant : 60,00% - doesn t leave skin clean feeling : 26,66% - leaves too much film on the skin Positive features of make-up remover: : 86,66% - clean and refreshed skin feeling : 46,66% - the feeling of skin hydration : 13,33% - is pleasant Page 6 / 24
7. TESTING METHODOLOGY: USE TEST The use test conducted at home in accordance with Technical Instruction applicable at the J.S. Hamilton Poland S.A. IT-03/PK under dermatologist and ophthalmologist control on properly selected group of volunteers. The Evaluation Questionnaire form, the characteristics of the panel and numbers of volunteers (15 people) were in line with customer requirements. The product was applied by volunteers every day for 2 weeks (total duration of the test). The skin acceptability was checked every day, by the subjects themselves at home. The volunteers were informed that during the test any other products of similar effects should not be used and, that in case of any side effects (skin ) they should immediately stop using the product and consult a dermatologist and ophthalmologist at J.S. Hamilton Poland S.A. The task of the volunteers were to answer 22 closed questions. The ophthalmological evaluation includes preliminary assessment, emergency assistance if need arises within the application period and the final assessment after 2 weeks. The ophthalmologist control is performed with slit lamp. It allows to see areas at the front of the eye, including the eyelids, conjunctiva, iris, lens, sclera, and cornea. Using this test, ophthalmologist can microscopically examine the eye for any abnormalities or problems. The ophthalmologist evaluated the possible occurrence of any undesirable symptoms such as: burning eyes, pinching, itching, redness, tearing, changes in the skin of eyelids, edema of the eyelids during application period of tested cosmetic product. The skin in the site of application and the eyes of qualified volunteers were no lesions that require medical treatment. The volunteers evaluated following product claims, also corresponded to questions about skin tolerance at the site of application and eye tolerance. The volunteers also gave the overall rating of the product and rating of the product in comparison with the same type of products used before and gave an answer on intention of buying the product after 2 weeks of regular use. Page 7 / 24
8. RESULTS: The results of the EYE MAKE-UP REMOVAL GLOVE include: 8.1. Assessment of the product s impact on safety of human health including the tests on skin tolerance in the site of application. 8.2. Assessment of the product s impact on safety of human health including the eyes tolerance tests with using slit lamp. 8.3. Proof of the effect claimed for the product. 8.1. DERMATOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OPINION AND INTERPRETATION. Based on the medical tests and interviews collected from the volunteers (selected for the test), it was concluded that tested product was well tolerated by the skin all of 15 volunteers. Repeated product application (test duration 2 weeks) did not cause any adverse reaction and skin in the area of product application. In addition, the product does not cause dryness, discomfort of the skin at the site of application in 14 of 15 volunteers. Contraindications for use of the product are: acute inflammation of the skin, requiring pharmacological treatment, and allergy recognized or hypersensitivity to any of its ingredients. The results obtained in the test allow to conclude, that the product used as intended is safe for health of persons, in whom there is not a contraindication to its use. Page 8 / 24
8.2. OPHTHALMOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OPINION AND INTERPRETATION. The ophthalmologic test showed no changes of the anterior segment of the eye and eye protective apparatus by all of 15 volunteers. The tested product did not cause: burning eyes, pinching, itching, redness, tearing, changes in the skin of eyelids, edema of the eyelids. The test allows concluding, that product does not cause any adverse reactions and it is safe for human health. The tested product could be used by people with sensitive eyes and sensitive eye contour and people who wear contact lenses. Page 9 / 24
8.3. USE TEST EVALUATION OPINION AND INTERPRETATION. The results are presented in charts to illustrate the number of occurrences against the type of the given answer. 8.3.1. Product appearance. Page 10 / 24
8.3.2. Product application (comfort of use). 8.3.3. The product removes make up effectively only with water. Page 11 / 24
8.3.4. It cleanses the skin only with water. 8.3.5. The needs to use other products for make-up removing. Page 12 / 24
8.3.6. The product is gently in use. 8.3.7. Gives a feeling of comfortable skin care. Page 13 / 24
8.3.8. It provides the skin feeling fresh and clean. 8.3.9. It improves the skin condition. Page 14 / 24
8.3.10. It rinses the beauty facial masks. 8.3.11. The product is comfortable to use. Page 15 / 24
8.3.12. The product is multiple use. 8.3.13. The product dries out the skin. Page 16 / 24
8.3.14. The feeling of tightness/discomfort in the site of the product application. 8.3.15. Skin redness /skin burning. Page 17 / 24
8.3.16. Skin. 8.3.17. Eye burning / eye itching. Page 18 / 24
8.3.18. Eyes. 8.3.19. Recommendation for people who wear contact lenses. Page 19 / 24
8.3.20. Overall assessment of the product. 8.3.21. Product assessment in comparison with the same type of products used before. Page 20 / 24
8.3.22. Intention of buying the product. Single results are presented in Table 1. Table 1. Page 21 / 24
volunteer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 age 27 31 42 31 29 26 36 31 35 31 25 25 30 26 24 skin type mixed, sensitive, prone to and allergies mixed, sensitive, prone to and allergies dry, sensitive, prone to and allergies dry, sensitive, prone to and allergies mixed, sensitive, prone to and allergies dry, sensitive, prone to and allergies dry, sensitive, prone to and allergies mixed, capillaries dry, sensitive, prone to and allergies, atopi, capillaries mixed, capillaries mixed, sensitive, prone to and allergies mixed, sensitive, prone to and allergies normal mixed, sensitive, prone to and allergies normal, capillaries average Product appearance. 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 Product application (comfort of use). 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The product removes make up effectively only with water. 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 It cleanses the skin only with water. 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 The needs to use other products for make-up removing. 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 4 2 2 2 4 3 3 The product is gently in use. 4 4 5 4 4 3 2 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 3 4 Gives a feeling of comfortable skin care. 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 2 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 results and statements presented in original copy of the Report. Services and subsequent Reports are subject to General Conditions of Business, copy available at Page 22 / 24
REPORT No. 108423/15/GDY It provides the skin feeling fresh and clean. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 4 It improves the skin condition. 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 2 4 4 3 3 It rinses the beauty facial masks. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 The product is comfortable to use. 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 3 3 4 4 5 4 4 3 4 The product is multiple use. 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 3 4 The product doesn t dry out the skin The feeling of tightness/discomfort in the site of the product application The product doesn t cause skin redness and skin burning The product doesn t cause skin The product doesn t cause eye burning and eye itching The product doesn t cause eyes Recommendation for people who wear contact lenses. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Overall assessment of the product. 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 3 4 5 5 4 2 4 4 Product assessment in comparison with the same type of products used before. 4 no comparis on 4 4 4 4 5 3 no comparis on 3 4 4 4 2 3 4 Intention of buying the product. 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 3 3 3 5 5 5 2 4 4 Anna Liwińska-Kaczmarek Cosmetic Testing Expert (qualified electronic signature) results and statements presented in original copy of the Report. Services and subsequent Reports are subject to General Conditions of Business, copy available at Page 23 / 24
REPORT No. 108423/15/GDY 9. CONCLUSION: The tested product EYE MAKE-UP REMOVAL GLOVE was positively evaluated in relation to: appearance of the product, product application. The volunteers confirmed that: the product removes make up effectively only with water, the product cleanses the skin only with water, there is no needs to use other products for make-up removing, the product is gently in use, the product gives a feeling of comfortable skin care (exfoliating, smoothing), the product provides the skin feeling fresh and clean, the product rinses the beauty facial masks, the product is comfortable to use, the product is multiple use. Anna Liwińska-Kaczmarek Cosmetic Testing Expert (qualified electronic signature) Page 24 / 24