The City of El Cerrito, California

Similar documents
Apex Police Department 2016 Community Satisfaction Survey Summary

Prepared by GREEN VALLEY RECREATION, INC.

CALL TO POETS City of El Cerrito, California Art in Public Places Program Poet Laureate Program

Social Issues in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of Social Stigma and Drug and Alcohol Abuse: 2018 Nebraska Rural Poll Results

2014 Quality Of Life Survey Statistical Analysis

Holas, Jakub et al. Regionální kriminalita a její odraz v kvalitě života obyvatel Regional crime and its impact on quality of life Summary

COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS of the Regina Police Service, 2013

EU-SILC 2013 MODULE ON WELL-BEING DESCRIPTION OF SILC SECONDARY TARGET VARIABLES Version 5 March 2012

Subjective Well-Being Study

SUMMARY. Meeting Location El Cerrito City Hall San Pablo Avenue, El Cerrito

The Center for Community Studies at Jefferson Community College. Presentation of Results: Nineteenth Annual JEFFERSON COUNTY

Academic Professionals/Civil Service Quality of Life Survey

An Evaluation of the Success of Saving-Growing Personal Assets Project: Individual Development Accounts for People with Developmental Disabilities

Neighbourhood Connections report on the 2016 External Partner Survey

EVRLYRLY AGENDA REPORT

God and Society in North America, 1996 Generosity Questions From

Student Survey Oct: Specialty Services, Campus Safety

EHR Usage Among PAs. Trends and implications for PAs. April 2019 A Report from the 2018 AAPA PA Practice Survey

I. Survey Methodology

2008AARPDriverSafety Program CourseEvaluation

938 SAN PABLO AVENUE, ALBANY

ACCESS TO DENTAL CARE FOR BRISTOL STUDENTS

JUNE 2000 HEALTH NEWS INTEREST INDEX

Chapter (3) 3. Methodology

1. MSW Field practice (internship)

Snapshot 2016 COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT

Mapping fear of crime dynamically on everyday transport: SUMMARY (1 of 5) Author: Reka Solymosi, UCL Department of Security & Crime Science

2016 CPP Annual Report

CITY OF EL CERRITO HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE. Community Workshop #1

ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

(Weighted sample of 98 respondents) How serious are these issues to Boulder residents? Extremely serious Very serious Somewhat serious 38% 44% 31%

25 TM. Gallup ME. St Therese-Chesapeake ME25 Overall. Member Engagement Survey Results. February 2008 THE GALLUP ORGANIZATION

Stress, Burnout, and Health. William P. McCarty, Amie Schuck, Wesley Skogan and Dennis Rosenbaum

Responses % Responses % Totals % 44% Responses

A Method for Measuring Community Empowerment

Vermonters Choose Healthy Eating Habits: Children and Time Impact Eating Choices Most Vermonter Poll March, 2008 Michele C.

Racial/Ethnic Composition South Hayward, 2010

Clinton Citizen Survey

National Survey of Teens and Young Adults on HIV/AIDS

Major Themes. Overall, respondents perceive Dyersville to have satisfactory amenities, including:

Neighborhood Organization Information please confirm

Findings Report: Humboldt Park Community Nutrition & Physical Activity Survey

Gallup ME 25. Holy Spirit. Member Engagement Survey Results. November 10, 2009 GALLUP

Gallup ME 25. Our Lady of Grace. Member Engagement Survey Results. November 05, 2013 GALLUP

Student Satisfaction Survey

Andrology Lab. Main Campus Patient Experience November Market Research & Planning. Amanda Beacher 216/

SAFE COMMUNITIES SURVEY RESULTS 2000

Horizon Research. Public Trust and Confidence in Charities

Marathon County Medication Assessment Survey, 2013

Results of the 2016 Gender Equality in the Legal Profession Survey

Lewis & Clark National Estimation and Awareness Study

Survey â Abbreviated (NEWS-A) Brian E. Saelens, Ph.D., James F. Sallis, Ph.D.. Science. Retrieved from

Canada Toronto Edmonton Calgary Montreal Quebec City USA Philadelphia, PA Denver, CO Tampa, FL Europe Zurich French Creek Water Community CSM Draft Re

Grants West. Note that we only work for nonprofits based inside the United States. We lack the expertise to help organizations in other countries.

Executive Summary Survey of Oregon Voters Oregon Voters Have Strong Support For Increasing the Cigarette Tax

SURVEY TOPIC INVOLVEMENT AND NONRESPONSE BIAS 1

Faces of Wellness. Kent State University Bateman Gold Team. Latisha Ellison Daniel Henderson Taylor Pierce Lauryn Rosinski Rachel Stevenson

PPTA Membership Survey Results

SPCA Event Sponsor Information

Center for Urban Initiatives and Research Wisconsin Public Health Survey December 2011 N=626. Frequency Tables (Weighted)

ANALYSING THE LINK BETWEEN TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR, RESIDENTIAL LOCATION CHOICE AND WELL-BEING. A FOCUS ON TRAVEL SATISFACTION OF LEISURE TRIPS.

COUNTY LEVEL DATA FROM PWB POLLING BOULDER

2014 Hong Kong Altruism Index Survey

growing a community Executive Summary of the 2000 Giving and Volunteering Study

BLACK RESIDENTS VIEWS ON HIV/AIDS IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Brandon Police Service. Community Engagement Survey

A Comparison of Preferences and Perceptions of Alternate Equity Operationalizations

HEES for Spanish- Speaking Customers

East Cleveland Community Perceptions Baseline Survey. Final Report October 2012

Consumer Perception Survey Report

Patient Reference Group Action Plan

Meetings Attendees Public Speakers MPO Board Citizens Advisory Advisory

CSR Greater Fargo-Moorhead Community Health Needs Assessment of Residents. August 2015

Positive Responses Neutral Responses Negative Responses Do Not Know/No Basis to Judge

2017 Cannabis Public Engagement Survey Report

ParkScore. Youth Physical Activity. Outdoor Spaces & Buildings

LEO Pharma Questionnaires used in the Clinical Trial LP

2014 Progress Report. Multi-Year Accessibility Plan

SCIOTO PAINT VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER. Consumer Satisfaction Survey Report

CHS 2009 Baltimore City Community Health Survey: Summary Results Report

Adult Consumer and Family Member Perceptions of Care 2012: Findings from the Annual Survey of Pennsylvania Behavioral Health Service Recipients

Grantee Address: 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565

2019 Spring Convocation. Evaluation Results. All comments were reviewed by Cabinet

Sacred Heart University Institute for Public Policy

Distance Learning in Depression for Rural Primary Care and Mental Health Providers

Americans Current Views on Smoking 2013: An AARP Bulletin Survey

Fear of Crime and It s Effect upon Opinions of the Police Related to Police Professionalism. and Police Efficiency: A Secondary Data Analysis

MEASUREMENT, SCALING AND SAMPLING. Variables

Methodology for the VoicesDMV Survey

Parents Experiences During School Closures Due to H1N1 in High Closure Areas

JOB ANNOUNCEMENT MENTAL HEALTH LICENSED CLINICIAN - GERIATRIC SPECIALTY (GS) DATE POSTED: April 22, 2016 APPLICATION DEADLINE: OPEN UNTIL FILLED

Inventory Practice Survey 2008 Report - Headline summary

Performance Management Framework Outcomes for Healthwatch Kent June 2016

AreAmericansage45+ UsingPrescriptionDrugs Wisely:A2006Study

Public Confidence in the Police

2018 Connecticut Community Readiness Survey Results: CONNECTICUT

Ewing Township Welcome Booklet Neighborhood Group Ewing Township Green Team

Community Participation Program Kingfield Neighborhood Association 2011 Annual Report

Complaints about schools: Customer Satisfaction Survey 2013

COUNTY LEVEL DATA FROM PWB POLLING JEFFERSON COUNTY

Transcription:

10940 San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito, CA 94530 T: (510) 215-4300 www.el-cerrito.org The City of El Cerrito, California 2007 The National Citizen Survey National Research Center, Inc. 3005 30 th St. Boulder, CO 80301 T: (303) 444-7863 F: (303) 444-1145 www.n-r-c.com

Table of Contents Survey Background...1 About The National Citizen Survey... 1 Understanding the Results... 1 Profile of El Cerrito...3 Community Life...4 Quality of Life... 4 Ratings of Community Characteristics... 4 Perceptions of Safety... 4 Community Participation... 4 Local Government...5 Public Trust... 5 Service Provided by El Cerrito... 5 The City of El Cerrito Employees... 5 Additional Questions...6

Survey Background About The National Citizen Survey The National Citizen Survey (The NCS ) is a collaborative effort between National Research Center, Inc. (NRC) and the International City/County Management Association (ICMA). Understanding the Results Survey Administration Following the mailing of a pre-survey notification postcard to a random sample of 1,200 households, surveys were mailed to the same residences approximately one week later. A reminder letter and a new survey were sent to the same households after two weeks. Of the mailed postcards, 26 were undeliverable due to vacant or not found addresses. Completed surveys were received from 419 residents, for a response rate of 36%. Typically, the response rates obtained on citizen surveys range from 25% to 40%. It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a level of confidence (or margin of error). The 95 percent confidence level for this survey of 419 residents is generally no greater than plus or minus 5 percentage points around any given percent reported for the entire sample. The results were weighted to reflect the demographic profile of all residents in the City of El Cerrito. (For more information on the survey methodology, see Appendix B in the Report of Results. A copy of the survey materials can be found in Appendix C of the Report of Results.) Use of the Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor Response Scale The scale on which respondents are asked to record their opinions about service and community quality is excellent, good, fair or poor (EGFP). While symmetrical scales often are the right choice in other measurement tasks, we have found that ratings of almost every local government service in almost every jurisdiction tend, on average, to be positive (that is, above the scale midpoint). Therefore, to permit finer distinctions among positively rated services, EGFP offers three options across which to spread those ratings. EGFP is more neutral because it requires no positive statement of service quality to judge (as agree-disagree scales require) and, finally, EGFP intends to measure absolute quality of service delivery or community quality (unlike satisfaction scales which ignore residents perceptions of quality in favor of their report on the acceptability of the level of service offered). 1

Survey Background Putting Evaluations onto a 100-Point Scale Although responses to many of the evaluative questions were made on a 4 point scale with 1 representing the best rating and 4 the worst, many of the results in this summary are reported on a common scale where 0 is the worst possible rating and 100 is the best possible rating. If everyone reported excellent, then the result would be 100 on the 100-point scale. Likewise, if all respondents gave a poor rating, the result would be 0 on the 100-point scale. If the average rating for quality of life was good, then the result would be 67 on a 100-point scale; fair would be 33 on the 100-point scale. The 95 percent confidence interval around an average score on the 100-point scale is no greater than plus or minus 3 points based on all respondents. 2

Profile of El Cerrito As assessed by the survey, about 30% of El Cerrito residents have lived in the community for more than 20 years and 74% are over age 34. Another 24% are over age 64. Seventy-one percent are currently employed; 31% rent; 69% own and 75% live in detached single family homes. Over 95% of El Cerrito residents have at least some college and 76% have annual household incomes above $50,000. Six percent of El Cerrito residents reported that they are Spanish, Hispanic or Latino and 63% said they are White or Caucasian. 3

Community Life The National Citizen Survey contained many questions related to the life of residents in the community. Survey participants were asked to rate their overall quality of life, as well as other aspects of quality of life in El Cerrito. They also evaluated characteristics of the community, and gave their perceptions of safety in the City of El Cerrito. The questionnaire assessed use of the amenities of the community and involvement by respondents in the civic and economic life of El Cerrito. Quality of Life When asked to rate the overall quality of life in El Cerrito, 13% of respondents thought it was excellent. Only 3% rated overall quality of life as poor. El Cerrito as a place to raise children received an average rating of 56 on a 100-point scale. Ratings of Community Characteristics The highest rated characteristics of El Cerrito were ease of rail/subway travel, openness and acceptance, and ease of bicycle travel. When asked about potential problems in El Cerrito, the three concerns rated by the highest proportion of respondents as a major problem were crime, noise, and taxes. The rate of population growth in El Cerrito was viewed as too fast by 22% of respondents, while 3% thought it was too slow. Perceptions of Safety When evaluating safety in the community, 59% of respondents felt somewhat or very safe from violent crimes in El Cerrito. In their neighborhood after dark, 63% of survey participants felt somewhat or very safe. As assessed by the survey, 17% of households reported that at least one member had been the victim of one or more crimes in the past year. Of those who had been the victim of a crime, 82% had reported it to police. Community Participation Participation in the civic, social and economic life of El Cerrito during the past year was assessed on the survey. Among those completing the questionnaire, 30% reported volunteering in the past year. 4

Local Government Several aspects of the government of the City of El Cerrito were evaluated by residents completing The National Citizen Survey. They were asked how much trust they placed in their local government, and what they felt about the services they receive from the City of El Cerrito. Those who had any contact with a City of El Cerrito employee in the past year gave their impressions of the most recent encounter. Public Trust When asked to evaluate whether they were pleased with the overall direction taken by the City of El Cerrito, residents gave an average rating of 61 on a 100-point scale. Service Provided by El Cerrito The overall quality of services provided by the City of El Cerrito was rated as 55 on a 100-point scale. The City of El Cerrito Employees Impressions of the City of El Cerrito employees were assessed on the questionnaire. Those who had been in contact with a City of El Cerrito employee in the past year (52%) rated their overall impression as 61 on a 100-point scale. 5

Additional Questions Four additional questions were asked by the City of El Cerrito as listed below. The results for these questions are also available in the Report of Results. Results for the open-ended question can be found under separate cover. Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are with the City s efforts to share information about City issues, programs and services with the public by using each of the following ways: Question 16a: Policy Question 1 Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Total City s Web site (www.el-cerrito.org) 21% 64% 10% 5% 100% Quarterly newsletter 26% 64% 7% 3% 100% Media outreach/coverage 11% 53% 27% 10% 100% City events or programs 19% 60% 16% 5% 100% Recreation brochure 31% 56% 9% 4% 100% City meetings 17% 42% 24% 17% 100% Public/legal notices 10% 60% 18% 12% 100% Recycling Center mailings 38% 50% 10% 3% 100% Senior Center mailings 31% 46% 16% 6% 100% Other mailings 14% 64% 18% 4% 100% Note: "don't know" responses have been removed. Policy Question #2 The Ohlone Greenway (also called the BART path) is a trail (used for walking, biking, running, etc.) which runs the length of El Cerrito. How often do you or other members of your household use the Ohlone Greenway? Often (one or more times per week) 29% Semi-regularly (1-2 times per month) 18% Sometimes (3-6 times per year) 17% Rarely 18% Never 17% Total 100% 6

Additional Questions The City is considering ways to improve the Ohlone Greenway. How important, if at all, are each of the following potential improvements to the Greenway? Question 16c: Policy Question 3 Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Total Exercise equipment 5% 18% 34% 43% 100% Soft running trail 10% 30% 37% 23% 100% Children s play equipment 11% 30% 34% 26% 100% Benches 14% 38% 34% 13% 100% Art and interpretive displays 5% 19% 37% 38% 100% Water fountains 17% 28% 35% 20% 100% Bathrooms 14% 26% 31% 29% 100% Improved lighting 49% 38% 11% 3% 100% Emergency call boxes 44% 33% 17% 6% 100% Greater police presence 45% 31% 19% 5% 100% Dog run/dog park 12% 24% 32% 32% 100% Note: "don't know" responses have been removed. 7