MALDI-TOF MS: a new tool to rapidly assess antibiotic susceptibility

Similar documents
Rapid identification and resistance assessment: The future is mass spectrometry

Detection of NDM-1, VIM-1, KPC, OXA-48, and OXA-162 carbapenemases by MALDI- TOF mass spectrometry

Phenotypic detection of ESBLs and carbapenemases

Validating a selection method for. H. Hasman, Y. Agersø, C. Svendsen, H. Nielsen, N.S. Jensen, B. Guerra, Aarestrup, FM

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: A New Rapid ID Method in Clinical Microbiology

β-lactamase inhibitors

Surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae pathogens isolated from intensive care units and surgical units in Russia

Laboratory CLSI M100-S18 update. Paul D. Fey, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Associate Director Josh Rowland, M.T. (ASCP) State Training Coordinator

Detecting Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: why isn t there a single best method?

Mongolia September 2012

Carbapenem Disks on MacConkey agar as screening methods for the detection of. Carbapenem-Resistant Gram negative rods in stools.

Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Blood and CSF Culture Isolates At NHLS Academic Laboratories (2005)

Discussion points CLSI M100 S19 Update. #1 format of tables has changed. #2 non susceptible category

Screening and detection of carbapenemases

Academic Perspective in. David Livermore Prof of Medical Microbiology, UEA Lead on Antibiotic resistance PHE

OVERVIEW OF CURRENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS AND DATABASES

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry tools for microbial identification in archival document investigation

Results and experience of BARN ESBL project. Marina Ivanova and project team Tallinn

Determining the Optimal Carbapenem MIC that Distinguishes Carbapenemase-Producing

MALDI TOF MS based carbapenemase detection from culture isolates and from positive blood culture vials

Insert for Kit 98006/98010/ KPC/Metallo-B-Lactamase Confirm Kit KPC+MBL detection Kit KPC/MBL and OXA-48 Confirm Kit REVISION: DBV0034J

Expert rules. for Gram-negatives

Detecting CRE. what does one need to do?

SUPPLEMENTAL TESTING. Tan Thean Yen

Abstract. Introduction. Editor: R. Canton

5/10/13. Mass Spectrometry in diagnostic clin micro: progress and prospects. MS in Diagnostic Microbiology

MALDI Sepsityper Kit

A Strategy for Rapid Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility. Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria Directly Recovered from Positive

Frequency of Occurrence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacteria from ICU Patients with Pneumonia

jmb Research Article Review Semi Kim 1, Ji Youn Sung 2, Hye Hyun Cho 3, Kye Chul Kwon 1, and Sun Hoe Koo 1 *

The MALDI Biotyper An In Vitro Diagnostic System (IVD) for Identification of Bacteria and Yeasts with a Global Reach

Diagnosis of CPE: time to throw away those agar plates? Jon Otter, PhD FRCPath Guy s and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust / King s College London

CARBAPENEMASE PRODUCING ENTEROBACTERIACEAE

ALERT. Clinical microbiology considerations related to the emergence of. New Delhi metallo beta lactamases (NDM 1) and Klebsiella

In-House Standardization of Carba NP Test for Carbapenemase Detection in Gram Negative Bacteria

Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Taiwan

Impact of MALDI TOF on AST

Spread of carbapenems resistant Enterobacteriaceae in South Africa; report from National Antimicrobial Resistance Reference Laboratory

MHSAL Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Antimicrobial Resistant Organisms (AROs) - Response to Questions

NONFERMENTING GRAM NEGATIVE RODS. April Abbott Deaconess Health System Evansville, IN

Prevalence of Extended Spectrum -Lactamases In E.coli and Klebsiella spp. in a Tertiary Care Hospital

β CARBA Test Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains Contents 1. INTENDED USE

Sepsis Treatment: Early Identification Remains the Key Issue

Methodological and interpretative problems in antimicrobial susceptiblity tests of P. aeruginosa

Journal of Infectious Diseases and

Guidance on screening and confirmation of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriacae (CRE) December 12, 2011

Rapid identification of emerging resistance in Gram negatives. Prof. Patrice Nordmann

Received 31 January 2011/Returned for modification 2 March 2011/Accepted 15 March 2011

CRO and CPE: Epidemiology and diagnostic tests

The 8 th International CASEE Conference Warsaw University of Life Sciences SGGW May 14-16, 2017

Epidemiology of the β-lactamase resistome among Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the Chicago region

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Disclosure. Objectives. Evolution of β Lactamases. Extended Spectrum β Lactamases: The New Normal. Prevalence of ESBL Mystic Program

Technical Note # TN-31 Redefining MALDI-TOF/TOF Performance

Nature and Science 2017;15(10)

Educational Workshops 2016

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the identification of beta-hemolytic streptococci

Roula M. Abdel-Massih Dept. of Biology, University of Balamand, Lebanon

Safety and Bruker Emerging Technologies & MALDI-TOF. Tom Tague, Ph.D.

Carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae: Prof P. Nordmann Bicêtre hospital, South-Paris Med School

Genetic Analysis of Organisms Isolated From the ICU

PROFESSOR PETER M. HAWKEY

AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 13 October 2008 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi: /aac

What is new in EUCAST South Africa, May, Gunnar Kahlmeter EUCAST Technical Data Coordinator and Webmaster Sweden

Affinity of Doripenem and Comparators to Penicillin-Binding Proteins in Escherichia coli and ACCEPTED

Detection of SPM-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and CHDL-producing. Acinetobacter baumannii using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry

Rapid susceptibility testing: new phenotypic and non-wgs genotypic approaches

Update on CLSI and EUCAST

Direct identification of bacteria from positive anaerobic BacT/Alert blood cultures by. Contents Category: Diagnostics, typing and identification

ST11 KPC-2 Klebsiella pneumoniae detected in Taiwan

Overcoming the PosESBLities of Enterobacteriaceae Resistance

Expert rules in antimicrobial susceptibility testing: State of the art

Reporting blood culture results to clinicians: MIC, resistance mechanisms, both?

Comparative study of MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK 2 in bacteria identification

Detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae: a challenge for diagnostic microbiological laboratories

Standardisation of testing for Carbapenemase Producing Organisms (CPO) in Scotland

AMR prediction based on WGS data

Sensitive and specific Modified Hodge Test for KPC and metallo-beta-lactamase

Abstract. Introduction

Development of a phenotypic method for fecal carriage detection of OXA-48-producing

Evaluation of CHROMagar msupercarba for the detection of carbapenemaseproducing Gram-negative organisms

Molecular characterisation of CTX-M-type extendedspectrum β-lactamases of Escherichia coli isolated from a Portuguese University Hospital

International transfer of NDM-1-producing Klebsiella. pneumoniae from Iraq to France

Optimizing MALDI-TOF Use. Clinical Impact Laboratory Impact

Adenium Biotech. Management: - Peter Nordkild, MD, CEO, ex Novo Nordisk, Ferring, Egalet - Søren Neve, PhD, project director, ex Lundbeck, Novozymes

Evaluation of Six Phenotypic Methods for the Detection of Carbapenemases in Gram-Negative Bacteria With Characterized Resistance Mechanisms

Phenotypic Detection Methods of Carbapenemase Production in Enterobacteriaceae

Clinical Microbiology

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Julie Creighton and Clare Tibbs. Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch

CONSIDERATIONS IN UTI DETECTION AND POTENTIAL IMPACT ON ANTIBIOTIC STEWARDSHIP

Laboratory Protocol. November 2017 Version 3. Henrik Hasman, Yvonne Agersø and Lina M Cavaco (DTU Food)

Detecting carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae

MALDI Imaging Drug Imaging Detlev Suckau Head of R&D MALDI Bruker Daltonik GmbH. December 19,

Direct Identification of Urinary Tract Pathogens from Urine Samples by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Tandem MS in Microbiology. Chris Doern, PhD D(ABMM) UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX

8/31/2016 APPLICATIONS OF MATRIX ASSISTED LASER DESORPTION/IONIZATION TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY. MALDI-TOF Microflex applications

IDENTIFICATION OF FUNGAL PATHOGENS BY MALDI-TOF MASS SPECTROMETRY. Alex van Belkum Delhi - March 19, 2015

Solving practical problems. Maria Kuhtinskaja

Transcription:

MALDI-TOF MS: a new tool to rapidly assess antibiotic susceptibility Sören Schubert, MD Max von Pettenkofer-Institut Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Germany

Learning Objectives After this presentation, you should know the principles of MALDI-TOF MS and its application in identification of microorganisms be able to identify and to trace the development of MALDI-TOF MS for the -lactamase activity testing of bacteria record and compare facts about different approaches using MALDI-TOF MS for comprehensive antibiotic resistance testing be able to identify the pros and cons of using MALDI- TOF MS for resistance testing in diagnostic laboratory and will retrace possible future perspectives

MALDI-TOF MS MALDI Biotyper Bruker Daltonics Vitek MS biomérieux

MALDI-TOF: principle Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization, Time Of Flight

MALDI TOF Identification of bacteria and fungi Intens. [a.u.] 5000 4000 3000 2000 4364.06 5096.01 5380.64 6254.64 6315.49 6410.90 ribosomal Protein m/z RL36 4364,33 RS32 5095,82 RL34 5380,39 RL33meth. 6255,39 RL32 6315,19 RL30 6410,60 RL35 7157,74 RL29 7273,45 RL31 7871,06 RS21 8368,76 7157.65 7273.87 1000 7870.62 8368.99 0 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000 m/z E. coli

MALDI-TOF MS bacteria identification Workflow

Identification

Antibiotic resistance testing (AST) Disc Diff. Walkaway Vitek 2 Phoenix Time to result 12 24 h 12 48 h 7 18 h 8 18 h

MALDI-TOF MS 1. Direct detection of resistance factors

MRSA detection by MALDI-TOF MS?

MRSA

MALDI TOF detection of MRSA

Wolters et al., 2011

MALDI-TOF for detection of antibiotic resistance -lactamases (ESBL) carbapenemases

Problem

> 700 -lactamase - subtypes SHV-1 SHV-2 SHV-3 SHV-178 OXA-1 OXA-2 OXA-3 OXA-161 TEM-1 TEM-2 TEM-3 TEM-213 CTX-M-1 CTX-M-2 CTX-M-3 CTX-M-75 CMY-1 CMY-2 CMY-3 CMY-23 IMP-1 IMP-2 IMP-3 IMP-23

Conclusion 1: Direct detection of resistance factors Detection of clonal groups No reliable resistance identification -lactamases, PBP2a, Van A Van B

MALDI-TOF MS 1. Direct detection of resistance factors (e.g. PBP2a) 2. β-lactamase activity test

-lactamase activity +H 2 O + 18 Da - 44 Da A B C

Ampicillin + ESBL-E. coli Ampicillin + -Lact.-neg. E. coli C A B Sparbier et al., 2012

Procedure 1 colony of fresh o/n culture 10 µl antibiotic solution (e.g. 0.5 µg/ml CTX) 1-2 h incubation, 37 C Spin down bacteria Supernatant on MALDI-target plate Mass range 100 1000 Da Calibration with suitable molecules

396.0 414.1 456.1 x10 4 5 4 3 2 1 0 Intens. [a.u.] 460.9 369.9 414.0 445.0 x10 4 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 x10 4 Intens. [a.u.] 396.1 414.1 456.1 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Cefotaxime (CTX) A B C 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 m/z CTX + ESBL- neg. E. coli CTX + ESBL-pos. E. coli CTX / CLAV + ESBL-pos. E. coli Intens. [a.u.]

Σ peak-intensity hydrolysed log Σ peak-intensity non-hydrolysed

CAZ 0.5 mg/ml CAZ in 10 mm NH 4 -hydrogen carbonate 2 h incubation 15 µl sup plus 5 µl 0.5 ng/µl reserpine 1.5 µl spotted 1.5 1.0 -lactamaseactivity 0.5 0.0-0.5 CAZ_09 2012-04-17 CAZ_16358 2012-04-17 CAZ_20 2012-04-17 CAZ_DH5a 2012-04-17 CAZ_K1 2012-04-17 logrq No cleavage spontaneous hydrolysis

Identification -lactamase activity

E. coli directly from positve blood cultures ampicillin 1 0.5 0-0.5 Ampicillin MIC >8 Ampicillin MIC 8 Jung et al., 2014 4 MIC>256 5 MIC 4 9 MIC 8 10 MIC >256 11 MIC >256 16 MIC >256 18 MIC >256 20 MIC 3 21 MIC 4 22 MIC 3 25 MIC 4 30 MIC 6 31 MIC 4 37 MIC 6 39 MIC 2 40 MIC >256 41 MIC 3 42 MIC >256 45 MIC >256 46 MIC 4 47 MIC>256 51 MIC>256 52 MIC 4 54 MIC >256 55 MIC >256 56 MIC >256 57 MIC >256 60 MIC >256 61 MIC >256 62 MIC 4 66 MIC >256 67 MIC >256 69 MIC 4 72 MIC >256 73 MIC >256 74 MIC >256 76 MIC >256 81 MIC >256 82 MIC 6 84 MIC >256 85 MIC 3 86 MIC >256 87 MIC 8 90 MIC 2 91 MIC >256 92 MIC >256/4 93 MIC 1,5 94 MIC >256 E. coli ATCC 25922 logrq

Conclusion 2: MALDI-TOF -lactamase activity test Rapid test 1.5 3 h Automated analysis Directly from positive blood cultures Restricted to certain antibiotic resistances -lactamases, e.g. ESBL, carbapenemases

MALDI-TOF MS 1. Direct detection of resistance factors (e.g. PBP2a) -lactamase activity test 3. Antibiotic susceptibility test - phenotypic assays MBT-RESIST

Phenotypic Susceptibility Testing (MBT-RESIST) 13 C 6 15 N 2 -L-Lysin 8Da 8Da For all growing bacteria applicable Susceptible: No integration Resistant: Integration

Susceptibility testing using stable isotopes normal Lys Control 1 heavy Lys + antibiotic Susceptible Resistant heavy Lys Control 2 October 22, 2015 30

S. aureus mass spectra gel view MSSA OXA - susceptible strain MRSA OXA - resistant strain normal normal heavy + Oxa heavy + Oxa heavy heavy October 22, 2015 31

MRSA P. aeruginosa

MBT MS-RESIST / P. aeruginosa (Tobramycin- susceptible) Intens. [a.u.] 6000 5000 5213.353 5739.928 1025_N 0:B8 MS, BaselineSubtracted, Smoothed 4000 3000 2000 5116.874 normal 1000 0 6000 5212.952 1020_H_60 0:A10 MS, BaselineSubtracted, Smoothed 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 5116.441 5739.242 heavy + TOB Intens. [a.u.] 0 6000 1020_H 0:A7 MS, BaselineSubtracted, Smoothed 4000 5021.891 5213.753 5117.392 5244.916 5740.349 5795.447 heavy 2000 0 5000 5100 5200 5300 5400 5500 5600 5700 5800 m/z Jung et al., EJCMID 2013 October 22, 2015 33

MS-RESIST/ P. aeruginosa (Tobramycin-resistant) Intens. [a.u.] 5000 4000 6050.312 4025_N 0:G10 MS, BaselineSubtracted, Smoothed 6679.371 3000 2000 5740.567 6351.691 normal 1000 0 6000 6113.220 6630.988 4020_H_60 0:G1 MS, BaselineSubtracted, Smoothed 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 6049.902 5739.994 6113.019 5796.772 6351.301 6390.383 6678.694 6717.281 heavy + TOB 0 1.25 Intens. [a.u.]x10 4 6050.252 4020_H 0:F11 MS, BaselineSubtracted, Smoothed 6679.317 1.00 0.75 5740.398 6113.323 6351.650 6718.107 6390.951 heavy 0.50 5796.203 0.25 0.00 5600 5800 6000 6200 6400 6600 m/z Jung et al., EJCMID 2013 October 22, 2015 34

ciprofloxacin Pseudomonas aeruginosa meropenem tobramycin Jung et al., 2014

MALDI-TOF MS 1. Direct detection of resistance factors (e.g. PBP2a) -lactamase activity test 3. Antibiotic susceptibility test - phenotypic assays MBT-RESIST MBT-ASTRA

3. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by phenotypic assays Phenotypic assay without isotopes?

MALDI-TOF MS as a quantitative growth monitor MBT-ASTRA BHI McF 0.5 Incubation 37 C Species dependent time Antibiotic Cell lysis Lysis reagent with internal standard Target preparation Acquisition of MS profile spectra

spectra view Klebsiella pneumoniae Standard [M+ H] 2+ Standard [M+ H] 2+ Standard [M+ H] + Standard [M+ H] + BHI + Meropenem 8 µg/ml susceptible BHI only Meropenem resistant Lange et al., J Clin Microbiol. 2014

Conclusion (1) Direct detection of resistance factors Detection of clonal groups May help to identify distinct clonally distributed resistance factors False positive and negative results possible! (yet) no direct detection of -lactamases, PBP2a, Van A/B,

Conclusion (2) -lactamase activity test Rapid test 1.5 3 h Automated analysis Directly from positive blood cultures Restricted to certain resistances -lactamases All -lactamases detectable?

Conclusion (3) Phenotypic resistance test (MBT-RESIST / MBT-ASTRA) Rapid tests 2 3 h Automated analysis available Stable Isotopes: A rather complex workflow kits and cards are needed All bug-drug combinations analyzable?

MALDI-TOF MS for antibiotic resistance testing Pro Reduction of time to result: 12 h 2.5 h Phenotypic assay irrespective of underlying molecular mechanism High-throughput feasible Low costs of consumables Cons Initial culture necessary plus 12 24 h High costs of MALDIhardware (Yet) no determination of MIC values (Yet) no test kits available hands on time is high

Max von Pettenkofer-Institut Jette Jung Theresa Eberl Christina Popp Julia Walker Christina Hamacher Lukas Schmidt Birgit Gross Andreas Wieser ForBIMed FöFoLe