Final Rule Material: Changes to Exempt Categories

Similar documents
Summary of Changes to Human Subjects Regulations: Effective January 21, 2019

Kate Gallin Heffernan (Chair) (617) Mark A. Borreliz (617)

Final Rule Material: New and Revised Definitions

Guidance on Benign Behavioral Interventions: Exempt Category Three 45 CFR (d)(3)(i)

Revised Common Rule: Next Steps

Revising the Common Rule: AAMC Member Feedback on Proposed Changes to the Categorization and IRB Review of Research

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

COMMON RULE 2019 IMPLEMENTATION DATE: JANUARY 21, 2019

IRB for Humanists. Naomi E. Coll, MPH, CPH, CIP Manager of Research Integrity

IRBMED Seminar Series

DEFINING RESEARCH WITH HUMAN SUBJECTS - SBE

REQUIRED INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) EDUCATIONAL READING FOR FLETCHER SCHOOL RESEARCHERS APPLYING FOR EXEMPTION FROM IRB

SALISBURY UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESEARCH APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

OHRP - Guidance on Research Involving Coded Private Information or Biological Specimens

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD GUIDANCE ON ELECTRONIC INFORMED CONSENT

IRB FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. 1. Who must apply for human subjects review through the IRB (Institutional Research Board)?

EXEMPT RESEARCH. Investigators should contact the IRB Office if there are questions about whether an amendment consists

HSPC/IRB Description of Research Form (For research projects involving human participants)

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and

TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE

IRB GRAND ROUNDS SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH: NEED TO KNOW

Research. + Human Subjects Protections for. IRB Review and Approval at UW. October, Bailey Bodell, CIP. Reliance Administrator

Office of Research Compliance. Research Involving Human Subjects

Type of Review Requested:

MC IRB Protocol No.:

OHRP Guidance on the Involvement of Prisoners in Research

Phone Numbers: (work) (cell/home) Phone Numbers: (work) (cell/home)

Human Subjects Research: Overview. Colleen Kohashi and Tani Prestage Office for the Protection of Human Subjects (OPHS) February 26, 2016

Levels of IRB Review

Protecting Human Subjects In Social-Behavioral-Educational Research:

Revised August 28, 2018

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Procedure

IRB Policy 5 Research Activities

APPLICATION/RESEARCH PROTOCOL REVIEW FORM

IRB Review Points to Consider September 2016

IRB PROPOSAL GRADING RUBRIC

Flexibility and Informed Consent Process

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its medical

MDCH IRB REVIEW APPLICATION Authority: Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46

Understanding Minimal Risk in SBR: NRC Recommendations for Proposed Changes to the Common Rule

Florida State University Policy 7-IRB-26

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH AT ORANGE COAST COLLEGE

IRB EXPEDITED REVIEW

Alignment of FSMA with Existing Food Safety Programs International Citrus & Beverage Conference

RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN PARTICIPANTS EXPEDITED/FULL APPLICATION

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS ST. MARY'S UNIVERSITY HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE Institutional Review Board

IRB policy and procedures 1. Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College

3/6/2017-6/15/2017 Permission to Take Part in a Human Research Study Page 1 of 6

Institutional Review of Research Involving Human Participants. IRB Presentation. University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization

2014 FDA/JIFSAN Food & Nutrition Webinar

DETERMINING WHETHER AN ACTIVITY IS HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL REGULATIONS

BARNARD COLLEGE Application for the Approval of the Use of Human Subjects in Research

Human Subjects Application for Full IRB and Expedited Exempt Review

Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its medical

Q5 If there is more than one faculty researcher, then enter co-researchers information (Name, address)

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget

IDENTIFYING, ASSESSING, AND RESOLVING ISSUES IN SOCIAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (SBER)

The AAA statement on Ethnography and Institutional Review Boards (2004) provides a useful working definition:

DISCLOSURE OF ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE/DRUG ABUSE RECORDS. This Policy describes permissible disclosures of Alcohol and Substance/Drug Abuse Records.

Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing Intervention--Exploring a Strategy for

POLICIES GOVERNING PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH AND TEACHING AT WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY and REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH

Policy and Procedure Regarding Use of Human Subjects in Research

1. What is your role in the AAHRPP accreditation process?

Policies and Procedures Manual Human Subjects Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Guidelines for Developing a School Substance Use Policy. Table of Contents

QA Program Evaluation Research Tool CF-195, Effective

Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans

IRB, IDEATE, AND HSR. February, 2018 Manuel Gonzalez

Institutional Review Boards and Human Subjects Protection

PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION TO USE HUMAN PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH

TITLE: Obtaining Informed Consent of Non-English Speakers SOP #: CON-101 (formerly SM-507) Page: 1 of 7 Effective Date: 1/14/2016

July 3, Re: Proposed Rule: National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard. 83 FR (May 4, 2018). Docket No. AMS-TM

Human Research Participant Protection Program

The proposed rule is significant, and the requirements and exceptions are complex. Key provisions of the proposal are described below.

Amendments to the Mental Health Act 1986 (Vic) regarding involuntary treatment and Community Treatment Orders

IRB Reviewer Worksheet for Expedited Reviews

BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES WHEN CONDUCTING HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH

Florida Medicaid. Dental Services Coverage Policy. Agency for Health Care Administration

Integrating HIPAA Into Your Compliance Program

Medical gap arrangements - practitioner application

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting public input on updated

Human Subjects Protection Specialist October 22 nd, 2010

Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission. POSITION ON EMPLOYMENT-RELATED ALCOHOL AND DRUG TESTING November 2006

AN INVESTIGATOR S GUIDE TO RESEARCH WITH HUMAN PARTICIPANTS

Legislative Bill Watch As of Thursday March, 13, 2014

RESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS

COMPETENT AUTHORITY (UK) MEDICAL DEVICES DIRECTIVES GUIDANCE NOTES FOR MANUFACTURERS OF DENTAL APPLIANCES

ASAR. Australian Sonographer Accreditation Registry. Form 1-2. Application guide for entry onto the register of Accredited Student Sonographers

WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION DECLARATION OF HELSINKI. Ethical Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Human Beings

Regulations. On Proper Conduct in Research TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY

SJC IRB. Policies and Procedures. Institutional Review Board Committee Chair: Peter Lin, Ph.D.

Dental ConeBeam Computed Tomography (CBCT) X-ray Systems

DRUG PRODUCT INTERCHANGEABILITY AND PRICING ACT

Overview. Goals of NHANES. Overview. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Language for Consent Forms

Application for Ethical Approval of Research Proposals

Investigator s Handbook for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Institutional Review Board Revised February 23, 2017

University of Illinois Human Subjects Research Conference

Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012; Regulatory Science Initiatives; Public Hearing;

Transcription:

Final Rule Material: Changes to Exempt Categories Lorna Hicks, MS Duke University 2017 Biomedical Research Alliance of New York LLC CITI Program is a division of BRANY CITI Program Final Rule Materials This presentation can be used to introduce those involved in the research enterprise to the federal Common Rule changes, which are a result of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Final Rule published in 2017. This presentation will review changes to the exempt categories of research. All CITI Program Final Rule materials are available on the Resources tab of the CITI Program website, www.citiprogram.org/en/resources.

Introduction For consistency and clarity, this presentation uses citations to 45 CFR 46, Subpart A, version of the Common Rule. The regulations themselves should be read and understood before implementing changes. Note: the Final Rule s preamble is a good source for further explanation. Note: These resources are based on the Final Rule and Interim Final Rule issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) at 45 CFR 46, Subpart A - "Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects" (the Common Rule) on 19 January 2017 and 22 January 2018, respectively. All but one category was revised. New categories were added. Two new processes were introduced with the new categories. Limited IRB review Broad consent Final Rule Updates to Exempt Research

What Does Exempt Mean? Exempt means not subject to the requirements of the Common Rule. However, it is important to note that exempt does not always mean exempt from all of the requirements of the Common Rule, as certain exempt categories now have specified requirements as a condition of exemption (HHS 2017). For Example The new Exempt Category 7 includes specific regulatory requirements of broad consent and limited IRB review as a condition of being exempt from other regulatory requirements. New Regulatory Section for Exempt Research The pre-2018 rule had six exempt categories in section 46.101(b). The revised Common Rule gives exempt categories an entire section in 46.104, and now includes eight categories in 46.104(d)(1-8). Pre-2018 Rule Final Rule 46.101(b)(1-6) 46.104(d)(1-8) 6 Categories 8 Categories

Section 46.104, Exempt Research New Section 46.104 was previously Reserved in the pre-2018 rule. Section 46.104 has been designated as Exempt Research. Section 46.104(a) states that research activities must comply with the requirements of this section and as specified in each category in order to be exempt from the Common Rule. Section 46.104(b) reviews the use of exemption categories for research subject to the requirements of Subparts B, C, and D. Section 46.104(c) is reserved. Section 46.104(d) lists the eight categories of exempt research. Category 1: Research in Established or Commonly Accepted Educational Settings This category has been amended from the pre-2018 rule to include a condition that the research is not likely to have adverse impacts on: Students learning required educational content, or Assessment of educators who provide instruction The exemption may only be used for studies about normal educational practices.

Category 2: Educational Tests, Surveys, Interviews, Observations of Public Behavior The new regulation allows for exemption as long as one of the three criteria is met: 1. Information obtained is not identifiable 2. Disclosure outside of the research would not put subjects at risk of harm 3. Information obtained can be identifiable but the IRB has done a limited IRB review in keeping with 46.111(a)(7) which relates to there being adequate provisions for protecting privacy and maintaining confidentiality Limited IRB review is only sometimes an option with this category. The Final Rule revised this category to include visual or auditory recording as research methods. Surveys also cannot be combined or paired with collection of biospecimens or interventions, as those additional activities would disqualify the research from this category. When the research is subject to Subpart D and includes children, Category 2 still does not allow: Surveys Interviews Category 2, continued Investigator participating in the activities being observed (public behavior observation without intervention is permitted)

Category 3: Benign Behavioral Interventions in Conjunction with the Collection of Information From Adult Subjects This is a new category (the pre-2018 Category 3 was eliminated). This exemption is only for benign behavioral research with adults, and is not applicable to children. An example provided is having subjects solve puzzles under various noise conditions. Benign behavioral interventions are defined as brief in duration, harmless, painless, not physically invasive, not likely to have a significant adverse lasting impact on the subjects, and the investigator has no reason to think the subjects will find the interventions offensive or embarrassing (HHS 2017). Category 3, continued Exemption is permitted if the data are recorded in such a way that the identity of the subjects cannot be readily ascertained either directly or indirectly or if the subjects identities can be ascertained, a disclosure of the responses outside the research setting would not reasonably place the subjects at risk of harm. Alternatively, if the subjects identities can readily be ascertained and if a disclosure of subjects responses has potential to harm subjects, the exemption is permitted if the IRB conducts a limited review and determines that there are adequate provisions to protect the privacy of subjects and to maintain the confidentiality of data. Limited IRB review is only sometimes an option with this category.

Category 3 and Deception Research using deception is not eligible for exemption in this category unless the subjects prospectively agree that they will be unaware of or misled regarding the nature and purpose of the research. Deception is allowed if certain criteria are met. Category 4: Secondary Research for Which Consent is Not Required The Final Rule revised this category. Covers secondary research uses of identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens. Category 4 does not require informed consent if certain criteria are met. It is important to note that data do not need to be existing ( on the shelf ) at the time of the research study, as was previously required by the pre-2018 rule. The data can be collected prospectively and still be used for exempt research under Category 4 in the Final Rule.

Category 5: Research and Demonstration Projects that Are Conducted or Supported by a Federal Department or Agency The Final Rule revised this category to allow research supported by a federal agency (not just conducted) to: Qualify for this exemption. Provide examples of the types of public benefit and service programs covered by the exemption. Clarify the federal components for which the exempt research is subject to approval (for example, delegated subordinate agencies). Category 6: Taste and Food Quality Evaluation and Consumer Acceptance Studies This is the only unchanged category.

Category 7: Storage or Maintenance for Secondary Use for Which Broad Consent is Required Limited IRB review is always required for this category. This is a new category. This category is for the storage of identifiable biospecimens and identifiable private information, prior to secondary analysis. The storage and maintenance may be exempt if the IRB conducts a limited IRB review to determine that there are adequate provisions to protect the privacy of subjects and maintain the confidentiality of data, and if broad consent is obtained. Category 8: Secondary Research for Which Broad Consent is Required Limited IRB review is always required for this category. Category 8 also requires that the investigator does not include returning individual research results to subjects as part of the study plan; however, the exemption does not prevent investigators from returning results if required by law. This is a new category. Category 8 allows the secondary analysis of existing private identifiable data and identifiable biospecimens provided broad consent was secured and the documentation of consent was either secured or waived. IRBs must determine that there are adequate provisions to protect the privacy of subjects and maintain the confidentiality of data as noted in 46.111(a)(7), and that the use is within the scope of the broad consent.

Exempt Research and Subpart B Applicability Final Rule consistent with the pre-2018 rule. Each of the exemptions can be applied to research that is subject to Subpart B. Exempt Research and Subpart C Applicability The Final Rule changes the pre-2018 rule to allow the exemptions to apply to Subpart C for research involving a broader subject population if the research only incidentally includes prisoners. The Final Rule permits the exempt secondary research of information or biospecimens from subjects who are prisoners, if that research is not seeking to examine prisoners as a subpopulation. The Final Rule also allows subjects to continue in exempt research if they become prisoners during a study. Exempt research now allowed to incidentally include prisoners (research not seeking to examine prisoners as subpopulation).

Exempt Research and Subpart D Applicability The Final Rule does not permit the exemption of research with children that includes identifiable information and is reviewed under a limited IRB review. Consistent with pre-2018 rule, observation of the public behavior of children under Category 2 is allowed only if the investigator does not participate in the activities being observed. Consistent with pre-2018 rule, surveying and interview procedures with children may not be exempt. Final Rule allows research with children to be exempt for categories 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. References M U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 2017. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Federal Register 82(12):7149-274. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 2018. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects: Delay of the Revisions to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Federal Register 83(14): 2885-2894.