LUNG CANCER: LDCT DISCLOSURES NONE. Erika Swanson, MD Radiation Oncologist Ascension Columbia-St. Mary s February 1, /9/2018

Similar documents
Disclosures. Overview. Selection the most accurate statement: Updates in Lung Cancer Screening 5/26/17. No Financial Disclosures

Lung Cancer Screening: To screen or not to screen?

LUNG CANCER SCREENING: LUNG CANCER SCREENING: THE TIME HAS COME LUNG CANCER: A NATIONAL EPIDEMIC

Lung Cancer Screening: Benefits and limitations to its Implementation

LUNG CANCER SCREENING

Screening for Lung Cancer - State of the Art

Goals of Presentation

Christine Argento, MD Interventional Pulmonology Emory University

Lung Cancer Screening

Lung Cancer Screening Trials. Edward Harris Respiratory Research Fellow Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

Lung Cancer Screening. Eric S. Papierniak, DO NF/SG VHA UF Health

A Comprehensive Cancer Center Designated by the National Cancer Institute

Lung Cancer Screening In High Risk Populations:

CT Low Dose Lung Cancer Screening. Part I. Journey to LDCT LCS Program

Lung Cancer Screening: To Screen or Not to Screen?

LUNG CANCER SCREENING WHAT S THE IMPACT? Nitra Piyavisetpat, MD Department of Radiology Chulalongkorn University

DISCLOSURE. Lung Cancer Screening: The End of the Beginning. Learning Objectives. Relevant Financial Relationship(s) Off Label Usage

Lung Cancer Screening:

Learning Objectives. 1. Identify which patients meet criteria for annual lung cancer screening

The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST)

Screening for Lung Cancer: New Guidelines, Old Problems

What to know and what to make of it

Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(5):

Pulmonologist s Perspective

SCREENING FOR EARLY LUNG CANCER. Pang Yong Kek

Screening Programs background and clinical implementation. Denise R. Aberle, MD Professor of Radiology and Engineering

Screening for Lung Cancer. Michael S. Nolledo, MD Deborah Heart and Lung Center

SHARED DECISION MAKING AND LUNG CANCER SCREENING

VHA Demonstration Project for Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Chest CT Screening

Lung Cancer Screening: Current Status

CT screening for lung cancer. Should it be done in the Indian context?

Lung Cancer Screening

Lung Cancer Screening

PANEL DISCUSSION: SCREENING FOR LUNG CANCER. Anthony D Weaver MD

Lung Cancer Screening Computed Tomography Screening in Pa6ents at Risk for Lung Cancer

LDCT Screening. Steven Kirtland, MD. Virginia Mason Medical Center February 27, 2015

Lung Cancer Screening

Current Approach to Screening for Lung Cancer. James R Jett M.D.

Will CT screening reduce overall lung cancer mortality? Associate Professor of Radiology Department of Medical Imaging UHN / MSH / WCH

CT Screening for Lung Cancer for High Risk Patients

Lung Cancer screening :

Charles Mulligan, MD, FACS, FCCP 26 March 2015

LUNG CANCER SCREENING: ON WHOM DID YOU DO IT AND ON WHOM DO YOU RESPOND TO THE RESULTS?

Lung Cancer Screening: Evidence and current recommendations

Criteria USPSTF CMS. Frequency Annual screening Annual screening. No signs or symptoms of lung cancer

SCBT-MR 2016 Lung Cancer Screening in Practice: State of the Art

Selected Controversies. Cancer Screening. Breast Cancer Screening. Selected Controversies. Page 1. Using Best Evidence to Guide Practice

Example of lung screening

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: LOW-DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (LDCT) FOR LUNG CANCER SCREENING. POLICY NUMBER: CATEGORY: Technology Assessment

CLINICAL GUIDELINES. Lung-Cancer Screening Program Guidelines Robert Y. Kanterman, M.D. and Thomas J. Gilbert, M.D., M.P.P.

Lung Cancer Screening

Examine breast cancer trends, statistics, and death rates, and impact of screenings. Discuss benefits and risks of screening

Faculty Disclosure. Objectives. Lung Cancer in Kentucky: Improving Patient Outcomes 10/28/16. Lung Cancer Burden in Kentucky

Lessons learned for the conduct of a successful screening trial

Lung Cancer Screening: Who, What, Why? Myths Dispelled

New Advances in Lung Cancer

Pulmonary and Critical Care Year in Review

Page 1. Selected Controversies. Cancer Screening! Selected Controversies. Breast Cancer Screening. ! Using Best Evidence to Guide Practice!

Lung Cancer Screening: Now What?

Equity Issues with Lung Cancer Screening Prevent Cancer - Quantitative Imaging Workshop November 5-6, 2018 Alexandria, VA

Cancer Screening I have no conflicts of interest. Principles of screening. Cancer in the World Page 1. Letting Evidence Be Our Guide

Lung cancer screening in Switzerland

CT Lung Screening Implementation Challenges: State Based Initiatives

Introduction and Background

Role of CT in Lung Cancer Screening: 2010 Stuart S. Sagel, M.D.

Adam J. Hansen, MD UHC Thoracic Surgery

Lung Cancer Screening: Radiologic and Clinical Implications. Katherine R. Birchard, M.D. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Lung Cancer Screening Benefits, Risks & Challenges

The complex, intertwined role of patients in research and care

Lung Cancer Screening

Emerging Challenges in Primary Care: Lung Cancer Screening: Who, When, Why Or Why Not? Objectives. Faculty

Page 1. Controversies in Cancer Prevention and Screening. Disclosures. Screening. Principles of Screening. I have no conflicts of interest

Screening for Lung Cancer

Advancing Health Equity in Lung Cancer Outcomes

Page 1. Cancer Screening for Women I have no conflicts of interest. Overview. Breast, Colon, and Lung Cancer. Jeffrey A.

A Summary from the 2013World Conference on Lung Cancer Sydney, Australia

Pulmonary Nodules. Michael Morris, MD

2018 Community Outreach Report

Professor John K Field PhD, FRCPath University of Liverpool Cancer Research Centre, UK.

LUNG CANCER SCREENING Anthony C. Campagna, M.D.

Patient Decision Aid. Summary Guide for Clinicians. Clinician s Checklist

Recommendations on Screening for Lung Cancer 2016

Lung Cancer Screening Who, When, Why

Veterans Health Administration Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project: Results & Lessons Learned

Lung Cancer. Public Outcomes Report. Submitted by G. Brooks Brennan, MD. Based on 2015 data

Disclosures. Cancer Screening for Women. Topics for today. But what about? What works? What doesn t? I have no conflicts of interest

Objectives. Why? Why? Background 11/5/ % incurable disease at presentation Locally advanced disease Metastasis. 14% 5 year survival

Robert J. McKenna M.D. Chief, Thoracic Surgery Cedars Sinai Medical Center

Lung Cancer Case Study

Lung Cancer and CT Screening

NCCN Guidelines as a Model of Extended Criteria for Lung Cancer Screening

1. Historical Background Epidemiology and Screening. Dr Sameer Kaul MBBS, FRACP (Respiratory Physician) Lung Cancer Today (Australia)

Cancer Screenings and Early Diagnostics

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Radiofrequency Ablation 2014 Masters of Minimally Invasive Surgery

An Update on Lung Cancer Screening Policy and the Role of Quitlines

CT Lung Screening Implementation Challenges: ALA/ATS Implementation Microsite

The Challenge of Cancer Screening Part One Prostate Cancer and Lung Cancer Screening

Thoracic Recurrences. Soft tissue recurrence

Targeted Therapies in the Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. A Multi-Disciplinary Approach

Lung cancer Screening

Transcription:

LUNG CANCER: LDCT Erika Swanson, MD Radiation Oncologist Ascension Columbia-St. Mary s February 1, 2018 DISCLOSURES 2 NONE 1

OBJECTIVES 3 Rationale and evidence for LDCT for lung cancer screening Review guidelines for when to order LDCT LUNG CANCER 4 75% present with Stage III/IV disease Only 10% are asymptomatic and early stage 2

TREATMENT (in one slide!) 5 Stage I/II Operable: Surgery Inoperable: SABR (stereotactic ablative radiotherapy) or standard fractionated EBRT +/- chemo for N1 Local failure rate 10% Stage III Chemoradiotherapy durvalumab x 12 months Local failure rate >50% Stage IV Palliative treatment (chemo/targeted therapy or radiation) Best supportive care CASE 1 6 60 y/o male with 80 pack smoking history presents with 7 months of cough and increasing SOB Noted a 30 pound weight loss in past 2 years 3

DEFINITIVE CHEMORADIATION 7 6 MONTHS LATER 8 Started having balance difficulties and frequent falls 4

CASE 2 9 53 year old female with 40 pack smoking history Felt a popping sensation in her rib ED 14 MONTHS LATER 10 She noted increasing SOB and facial swelling 5

LUNG CANCER SCREENING: RATIONALE 11 High morbidity and mortality Significant prevalence (2%) Identifiable risk factor allowing for targeted screening More effective treatment for early stage disease LUNG CANCER SCREENING 12 Potential benefit Increase cure rate Increase local control Limit extent of surgery Potential harm Increase in invasive procedures Radiation exposure Anxiety with following nodules long term Overdiagnosis 6

PLCO Cancer Screening Trial 13 Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer screening trial Men and women ages 55-74 Not specifically high risk (50% current or former smokers) Screening group: Single PA CXR baseline and annually x 3 years Control group: Routine care Results No difference in lung cancer incidence rates after 13 years f/u No difference in lung cancer mortality JAMA 2011 NATIONAL LUNG SCREENING TRIAL 14 53,454 persons at high risk (2002-2004) Primary Analysis: Comparison of lung cancer mortality Secondary Analysis: Rate of death from any cause and the incidence of lung cancer in the two groups LDCT screening x 3 years CXR screening x 3 years 7

NLST 15 High risk patients 55-74 years old with at least 30 pack smoking history If prior smoker, cessation within 15 years Excluded Prior lung cancer Chest CT within 18 months Hemoptysis 15 pound weight loss in prior year LDCT 16 Multidetector scanner Noncontrast study obtained during a single maximal inspiratory breath-hold (<25 seconds) Average effective dose of ~1.5 msv (0.15 cgy) Diagnostic Chest CT 7-8 msv Transatlantic flight 0.08 msv 8

RESULTS NLST: + SCREEN 17 Higher rate of positive screening tests in LDCT group T0: 27% vs 9% T1: 28% vs 6% T2: 17% vs 5% Diagnostic work up not part of trial and institutional dependent LDCT: 96% were false positives for all three rounds CXR: 94.5% were false positives for all three rounds RESULTS NLST: ADVERSE EVENTS 18 Major complications 0.06% in positive LDCT that did not result in cancer Dx 11.2% in positive LDCT that resulted in cancer Dx 0.02% in positive CXR that did not result in caner Dx 8.2% in positive CXR that resulted in cancer Dx 9

RESULTS NLST: INCIDENCE LUNG CA 19 LDCT 1060 lung cancers 50% Stage I 8% Stage II 20% Stage III 22% Stage IV CXR 941 lung cancers 31% Stage I 9% Stage II 25% Stage III 35% Stage IV RESULTS NLST: LUNG CA MORTALITY 20 20% relative reduction in rate of death from lung cancer with LDCT 443 Number needed to screen with LDCT to prevent one death: 320 356 P=0.004 10

US PREVENTIVE TASK FORCE GUIDELINES 21 High risk Age 55-80 and > 30 pack smoking history and smoking cessation < 15 years ago LDCT Annually for at least 2 years and suggest until 15 years out from smoking or limited life expectancy NCCN GUIDELINES 22 High risk Age 55-74 and > 30 pack smoking history and smoking cessation < 15 years ago Age > 50 and >20 pack smoking history with one other risk factor Radon, Occupational exposure, COPD, pulmonary fibrosis LDCT Annually for at least 2 years and suggest until no longer eligible for definitive treatment 11

CONCLUSIONS 23 LDCT decreases lung cancer mortality by 20% compared with screening CXR CXR screening does not work LDCT detects lung cancers at an earlier stage LDCT has high rate of false positives USPTFS and NCCN recommend annual LDCT for high risk patients 12