Project Goal(s) and Objectives What is a goal? What is an objective? Measurable Objectives

Similar documents
SPECIAL EDUCATION (SED) DeGarmo Hall, (309) Website:Education.IllinoisState.edu Chairperson: Stacey R. Jones Bock.

College of Education and Human Services Exceptional Student & Deaf Education Course Descriptions

Council on Education of the Deaf. Office of Program Accreditation. CED Program Review Evaluation Rubric

ACTION PLAN: REGULAR PROGRAMS AND ADDITIONAL STRATEGIES

Department of Middle, Secondary, Reading, and Deaf Education

Undergraduate Programs

TExES Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (181) Test at a Glance

Catalogue Listing for School Psychology Core Courses

Universities Psychotherapy and Counselling Association

EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY (EPSY)

Grade 3 Program: Shaping Up My Choices

PSYCHOLOGY (413) Chairperson: Sharon Claffey, Ph.D.

Deaf Studies Program

Department of Kinesiology and Sport Leadership

University Training College (UTC) of UKCP

Increasing Access to Technical Science Vocabulary Through Use of Universally Designed Signing Dictionaries

CPF SCHOOL SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL

CEC Knowledge and Skill Base for All Beginning Special Education Teachers of Students Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing

American Sign Language (ASL)

Felicia Williams EDUCATION RELEVANT PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE. Msfeliciawilliams.weebly.com

EDUCATION (EDUC) Education (EDUC) 1. EDUC EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY Short Title: EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY

Council on Education of the Deaf Office of Program Accreditation

Course Code(s): SC004J01UV Full-time 3 Years SC004J31UV Part-Time 6 Years

STRATEGIC PLAN

Julie Delkamiller. (402) Dodge St. Omaha, NE (402) unomaha.edu

CODE OF COLORADO REGULATIONS 1 CCR Colorado State Board of Education

OHIO ASSESSMENTS FOR EDUCATORS (OAE) FIELD 044: SPECIAL EDUCATION SPECIALIST: DEAF/HARD OF HEARING

Programme Specification

Autism Studies FACULTY

Faculty of Social Sciences

EXHIBIT 3: ASSESSMENT TABLE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

HEALTH AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE (HHP)

Program Review: ASL and Deaf Studies

Two-Year Course Cycle. Department of Education Course Offerings. as of October 11, Academic Year

The Community School. Admissions Information Session

Engage for Change local a conversation in Spartanburg, SC. September 6, 2018

Job Description: Special Education Teacher of Deaf and Hard of Hearing

Presentation will cover: What are the current challenges? What does the research say? What does NCSE policy advice recommend?

Undergraduate Courses: Option 1 (rev: February 2011)

Completion of this program will NOT meet the requirements for teacher registration.

Academic Program / Discipline Area (for General Education) or Co-Curricular Program Area:

Psychology Departmental Mission Statement: Communicating Plus - Psychology: Requirements for a major in psychology:

Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind

College of Health Sciences. Communication Sciences and Disorders

World Association of Sign Language Interpreters. Deafblind Interpreter Education Guidelines

Designing a Peer Mentoring Program for Students with Mental Health Issues

Add Graduate Certificate in Deafness Rehabilitation (UTK Notification)

OFFICE OF EDUCATOR LICENSURE SUBJECT MATTER KNOWLEDGE. The Competency Review Made Simple

NTID Center on ACCESS TECHNOLOGY Rochester Institute of Technology National Technical Institute for the Deaf

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES

Erika Annette Lohmiller, PhD, LCPC, CADC, MISA II

EDP 548 EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY. (3) An introduction to the application of principles of psychology to classroom learning and teaching problems.

SPECIAL EDUCATION DEAF EDUCATION ENDORSEMENT PROGRAM

Department of Kinesiology

These materials are Copyright NCHAM (National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management). All rights reserved. They may be reproduced

Bachelor of Science in Physiotherapy

College of Education and Human Development Division of Special Education and disability Research

School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

School of Rural Health Strategic plan

American Sign Language (ASL)

COMPETENCY REVIEW GUIDE OFFICE OF EDUCATOR LICENSURE. How to Satisfy and Document Subject Matter Knowledge Competency Review Requirements

Deaf Studies. Program Learning Outcomes

Special Education, Language, and Literacy

MASTER PROGRAMME IN LOGOPEDICS AUDITORY-VERBAL THERAPY AFTER COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION

A strong commitment to American Sign Language and the culture of Deaf people guides the department.

CURRICULUM VITAE. Dr. Sandra G. Edwards University of Montevallo Montevallo, AL 35115

A Resilience Program Model

Final Priority--Training of Interpreters for Individuals. Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing and Individuals Who Are

Universities Psychotherapy and Counselling Association

Communications Sciences & Disorders Course Descriptions

Appendix II. Framework and minimal standards for the education and training of psychologists

A Division of Salisbury Behavioral Health. To apply for any of the positions posted, please send your letter of intent and resume to:

College of Health Sciences. Communication Sciences and Disorders

School of Health Sciences. School of Health Sciences Psychology.

Apostolic Faith Mission of South-Africa Pastors Continuous Development.

Arts and Entertainment. Ecology. Technology. History and Deaf Culture

May 15, Dear Parents and Community Members:

British Psychological Society. 3 years full-time 4 years full-time with placement. Psychology. July 2017

An Interpreter in my Classroom: What do I do now? Debra Russell, PhD. David Peikoff Chair of Deaf Studies

Curriculum Themes. Professional Practice Stream. Basic Clinical Sciences Stream. Mechanical Ventilation Stream. Therapeutics Stream

Master of Science in Secondary Education Concentration: Athletic Administration and Coaching (Non-Teaching)

ENDORSEMENT AREA: ATHLETIC ADMINISTRATION AND COACHING

Use of Auditory Techniques Checklists As Formative Tools: from Practicum to Student Teaching

College of Education. Rehabilitation Counseling

Kinesiology (KIN) kin 311 SeLeCted topics (1-4) Selected upper-division courses that are taught on a one-time basis. May be repeated for credit.

TExES American Sign Language (ASL) (184) Test at a Glance

Hearing Impaired K 12

The Effects of the Star Schools Bilingual In-Service Training Model on Teachers of the Deaf. Maribel Garate. Department of Education October 04, 2006

University of Southern Mississippi College of Health Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences Fall 2016

BANNER: Language of DHH. Program Title

HEALTH SCIENCES AND ATHLETICS Institutional (ILO), Program (PLO), and Course (SLO) Alignment

DEPARTMENT OF DANCE AND CHOREOGRAPHY

Illinois State University: Graduate Specialization Certificate: Listening and Spoken Language Professional Informational Meeting

COMPETENCIES FOR THE NEW DENTAL GRADUATE

Finnish Sign Language as a Foreign Language (K2)

COSD UNDERGRADUATE COURSES

PLAY THERAPY TRAINING PROGRAM

Response to the Language Equality and Acquisition for Deaf Kids (LEAD-K) Task Force Report

PST American Sign Language II This syllabus applies to PST and 04 Spring 2013 Three credits

CURRICULUM VITAE. Majed Alsalem Assistant Professor King Saud University.

Transcription:

Project Goal(s) and Objectives What is a goal? A goal is a broad statement of what you wish to accomplish. Goals are broad, general, intangible, and abstract. A goal is really about the final impact or outcome that you wish to bring about. The goal should be linked back to your need statement. The goal might use visionary words such as develop, decrease, deliver, establish, improve, increase, produce, and provide. What is an objective? An objective represents a step toward accomplishing a goal. In contrast to the goal, an objective is narrow, precise, tangible, concrete, and can be measured. Objectives should be stated in quantifiable terms. Objectives should be stated in terms of outcomes, not process. Objectives should specify the result of an activity. Objectives should identify the target audience or community being served. Objectives need to be realistic and capable of being accomplished within the grant period. Measurable Objectives An objective is what you want to accomplish; measurable refers to whether or not you will be able to reasonably demonstrate (through quantifiable or qualifiable data) that you have accomplished it. So first, you have to decide what you can accomplish within the scope of this project, and second, you have to determine what appropriate measure you will use to assess this. Not measurable: Determine whether or not grade inflation exists at UVU. Measurable: Determine whether or not grade inflation exists at UVU by collecting and analyzing data on semester-end grades given in all 2-year and 4-year degree programs at UVU over a five year period. (You d have to demonstrate that you did, in fact collect data for all 2-year and 4-year degree programs for that time period.) Not measurable: Motivate parents of Wee Care children to read to them. Measurable: 60% of children in Wee Care will be read to by parents, grandparents, or an older sibling a minimum of 4 times each week for at least 15 minutes and a log of reading activity will be submitted monthly. Goals and Objectives 2

Objectives with Outcomes & Target for Change II. PROJECT DESIGN (Interpreter Training Program Proposal, 2005) A. Project Goal and Objectives Project Goal: To train a sufficient number of qualified interpreters throughout the region in order to meet the communications needs of individuals who are deaf or hard-of-hearing and individuals who are deaf-blind, and to increase awareness of and sensitivity to Deafness-related issues among hearing people. Objective 1: Establish an Advanced Certification Program at UVSC as part of a comprehensive B.A. program in ASL & Deaf Studies that retains and improves its existing Novice-Level Training. Activities: a. Create a Local Partner Network who will provide oversight and direction to the program. b. Finalize approval for a B.A. program in ASL & Deaf Studies at UVSC with an emphasis area in advanced certification preparation. c. Recruit and hire a full-time Project Coordinator, a full-time Instructor/Interpreter Training Mentor; and a part-time Project Lab Director/Administrative Assistant. d. Develop and implement new courses for the Advanced Certification Program and Deaf Studies. e. Develop and implement mentored practicum and immersion programs. f. Enhance the Sign Language Interpreter Lab to meet the needs of interpreting students. g. Recruit new students to the Interpreting Emphasis and Advanced Certification Programs of the new B.A. of ALS & Deaf Studies program. Intended Outcomes: Within 4 years of funding awarded from the U.S. Department of Education, at least 30 UVSC students will be awarded Novice-Level Certification (state or national), 40 awarded Intermediate-Level Certification, and 5 awarded Master-Level Certification, and be professionally engaged in sign language interpreting. This number will increase by a minimum of 20% in the subsequent year of funding. We intend to establish a sustainable program that, over a 10 year period, will increase the net number of working interpreters in Utah by about 260 to reach a pool of 500 working in both the public and private sectors (see Table 2). http://www.uvu.edu/sponsoredprograms/pdfs/projectgoalandobjectives.pdf Table 2: intended number of interpreters in Utah by 2016 Current number of interpreters Projected number of interpreters Master 13 75 Intermediate 61 175 Novice 108 20 Temporary 46 50

TOTAL 238 500 Target for change: Individuals from Utah (and the surrounding region) intent on becoming sign language interpreters for people who are deaf, hard-of-hearing, and/or deaf-blind will have an indepth broadly based Bachelor s level training program available where none currently exists. The long-term target for change is that Utah will reach at least the minimum number of required interpreters (500) to meet the communications needs of individuals who are deaf or hard-ofhearing and individuals who are deaf-blind over a ten year period. Process Objectives / Outcome Objectives Table 1: Project Goals and Objectives (From Philosophy in the Schools proposal, 2005) Project Goal: Develop, implement, and evaluate a curricular model for increasing high school teacher and student access to Philosophy, philosophical topics and methodologies that build critical thinking and moral reasoning skills, and increase student understanding in a broad range of core courses. Process Objectives 1. Develop and implement a curriculum to teach 70 current teachers, prospective teachers, and teacher trainers innovative and effective strategies for integrating philosophical topics and methods, including Ethics, into the curriculum. 2. Develop, compile, and disseminate curriculum materials and ideas to be used by other educators and publish some of these, along with a resource guide for participating teachers and interested others at the summer seminar and on an interactive web site. 3. Develop measurement tools to assess the efficacy of the teacher development curriculum and of the methodologies advocated in this project on teacher understanding, teacher performance, and student skill acquisition. Teachers Outcome Objectives 1. 85% of participating teachers will demonstrate an understanding of the philosophical underpinnings of their disciplines as taught in the summer seminar, by scoring at least 85% or higher on a knowledge assessment post-test, demonstrating a significant improvement over a similar pre-test. 2. Teachers will modify or create 4 lessons plans that teach basic philosophical concepts of their disciplines and that present these concepts in a way that engages students higher order thinking skill; the lesson plans of 85% of the teachers will be assessed as competent in meeting this objective. 3. Teachers will demonstrate the use of philosophical methods of discourse in executing their lesson plans in such a way that students= higher level thinking skills are developed; the lesson execution of 85% of the teachers will be assessed as competent in meeting this objective. Students Outcome Objectives Students, as a class, in 10 randomly selected classrooms where teachers are program participants, will demonstrate a 60% or greater improvement in each of following skills, as demonstrated in the analysis of taped classroom discussions (pre and post measures):

1. Build critical thinking and moral reasoning skills, including the capacity to draw inferences and deductions from a variety of texts, and to understand underlying concepts. 2. Develop greater capacity to ask and seek answers to existential/meaningful questions. 3. Develop discussion skills as demonstrated by participation in thoughtful conversations. 4. Enhance emotional intelligence, including both self-awareness and awareness of others. 5. Help students develop a voice in exercising judgment on matters of importance. Ambitious & Attainable Objectives The Department of Education s TRIO programs require that applicants explain why their objectives are both ambitious and attainable. We have found that including this information in the narrative, even when not required, increases the competitiveness of a proposal. From the TRIO Student Support Services proposal, 2009 Objective A - PERSISTENCE A. PERSISTENCE RATE: 60% of all participants served by the SSS project will persist from one academic year to the beginning of the next academic year or graduate and/or transfer from a 2-year to a 4-year institution during the academic year. Relates to Purpose: This objective relates to the TRIO SSS program purpose of increasing the retention rates of eligible students. Addresses the Needs: UVU s SSS eligible students are not being retained at UVU for a variety of reasons. These reasons include: a) under prepared academically; b) lack of comprehensive and ongoing one-on-one academic and financial aid counseling; d) lack of sufficient financial aid counseling; e) lack of individualized tutoring and mentoring; f ) lack of personal hardiness; lack of financial literacy; and g) lack of adequate social support. By requiring and/or providing services to meet these needs, the UVU SSS project can increase participants retention rates. Addresses the Needs: UVU s SSS eligible students are not being retained at UVU for a variety of reasons. These reasons include: a) under prepared academically; b) lack of comprehensive and ongoing one-on-one academic and financial aid counseling; d) lack of sufficient financial aid counseling; e) lack of individualized tutoring and mentoring; f ) lack of personal hardiness; lack of financial literacy; and g) lack of adequate social support. By requiring and/or providing services to meet these needs, the UVU SSS project can increase participants retention rates. Clearly Described, Specific, & Measurable: This objective is clearly described and will

be measured by tracking the retention of each entering year s cohort from the beginning of each academic year to the beginning of the next academic year utilizing UVU s SCT Banner integrated, relational database system. The annual report generated by this system will indicate clearly whether or not 60% of students have been retained, excluding students who have graduated or transferred to another 4-year institution of higher education. Ambitious & Attainable: As explained in the needs section, the year-to-year retention rate for UVU students at large is 48.8%. The retention rate for SSS eligible students is 45.6% with the retention rate for some eligible remedial populations dropping to 36.8%. Since the institution has struggled to raise retention, and since the remedial needs of students will be a consideration in their being accepted to the program, the goal of 60% retention is a very ambitious goal. This objective is attainable because of the comprehensive array of services which will be offered to project participants targeting their particular needs. Depending on the individual needs of each project participant, appropriate and specifically targeted services will be offered to help them persist in school. http://www.uvu.edu/sponsoredprograms/pdfs/projectgoalandobjectives.pdf