ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA

Similar documents
HOW CLONOSEQ TESTING WORKS HOW DO WE KNOW WHAT TO TRACK? track changes in the amount of residual disease over time

MULTIPLE MYELOMA. The clonoseq Assay can predict progressionfree survival in myeloma patients

Kymriah. Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) Description

First relapsed childhood ALL Role of chemotherapy

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Ryan Mattison, MD University of Wisconsin March 2, 2010

MULTIPLE MYELOMA. The clonoseq Assay can predict progressionfree survival in myeloma patients

Appendix 6: Indications for adult allogeneic bone marrow transplant in New Zealand

Myelodysplasia/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MDS/MPN) Post-HCT Data

An Introduction to Bone Marrow Transplant

CARs vs. BiTE in ALL. David L Porter, MD Jodi Fisher Horowitz Professor University of Pennsylvania Health System Abramson Cancer Center

PDF of Trial CTRI Website URL -

Reference: NHS England 1602

Transition from active to palliative care EBMT, Geneva, Dr. med. Gayathri Nair Division of Hematology

Standard risk ALL (and its exceptions

Instructions for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Post-HSCT Data (Form 2113)

HIV POSITIVE YOUTH: LINKAGE & RETENTION IN CARE

Abstract 861. Stein AS, Topp MS, Kantarjian H, Gökbuget N, Bargou R, Litzow M, Rambaldi A, Ribera J-M, Zhang A, Zimmerman Z, Forman SJ

Targeting CD20 and CD22 in B-cell ALL Daniel J. DeAngelo, MD, PhD

Extramedullary precursor T-lymphoblastic transformation of CML at presentation

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Guidelines

NUP214-ABL1 Fusion: A Novel Discovery in Acute Myelomonocytic Leukemia

AIH, Marseille 30/09/06

N Engl J Med Volume 373(12): September 17, 2015

A.M.W. van Marion. H.M. Lokhorst. N.W.C.J. van de Donk. J.G. van den Tweel. Histopathology 2002, 41 (suppl 2):77-92 (modified)

Curing Myeloma So Close and Yet So Far! Luciano J. Costa, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham

FAQs about Provider Profiles on Breast Cancer Screenings (Mammography) Q: Who receives a profile on breast cancer screenings (mammograms)?

MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA. BY Dr SUBHASHINI 1 st yr PG DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRICS

Corporate Medical Policy. Policy Effective February 23, 2018

Yescarta. Yescarta (axicabtagene ciloleucel) Description

KYMRIAH (tisagenlecleucel)

Next-Generation Sequencing for the Assessment of Measurable Residual Disease

Reduced-intensity Conditioning Transplantation

What should I ask my treatment team?

ZIOPHARM / Intrexon Graft-Versus-Host Disease Exclusive Channel Collaboration SEPTEMBER 28, 2015

Timing and complications of allogeneic stem cell transplant in Ph + ALL

Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology

Complete Central Registry Treatment Information Requires Ongoing Reporting and Consolidation Well Beyond 6-Month Reporting

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: State of the Art in 2018 RICHARD W. CHILDS M.D. BETHESDA MD

Corporate Medical Policy

Acute Lymphoblastic and Myeloid Leukemia

Leukemia. Andre C. Schuh. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto

BC Cancer Protocol Summary for Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using azacitidine and SORAfenib

Blood Cancers. Blood Cells. Blood Cancers: Progress and Promise. Bone Marrow and Blood. Lymph Nodes and Spleen

Clinical Policy: Donor Lymphocyte Infusion Reference Number: CP.MP.101 Last Review Date: 11/17

Personalized Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Patrick Stiff MD Loyola University Medical Center

MRD in ALL: Correct interpretation in clinical practice. Deepak Bansal Prof., Pediatric Hematology-Oncology unit PGIMER, Chandigarh

One Day BMT Course by Thai Society of Hematology. Management of Graft Failure and Relapsed Diseases

ETP - Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

Global Fund Approach to Health System Strengthening

Kerrie Clerici, Michael Swain, Dominic Fernandez, Julia Schulz, Matthew Archer, Janine Campbell

Bone Marrow Transplantation and the Potential Role of Iomab-B

Tasigna. Tasigna (nilotinib) Description

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)

THE ROLE OF TBI IN STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION. Dr. Biju George Professor Department of Haematology CMC Vellore

Actinium Pharmaceuticals Highlights Analysis of Pivotal Iomab-B Phase 3 SIERRA Trial Presented in Oral Session at ASH Annual Meeting

Corporate Medical Policy

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 14 February 2007

Guideline on the use of minimal residual disease as a clinical endpoint in multiple myeloma studies

Letter 63: Childhood Leukemia: Blood Test Results Normalised After Four Months On Herbs

STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION FOR ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA

Graft Versus Tumour Effect

Minimal residual disease (MRD) in AML; coming of age. Dr. Mehmet Yılmaz Gaziantep University Medical School Sahinbey Education and Research hospital

Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Patient s Perspective

Sleep Market Panel. Results for June 2015

CAR- Your guide to KYMRIAH therapy. Transform your T cells for a transformed tomorrow. The first FDA-approved TREATMENT TRANSFORMED

BLINCYTO can eliminate detectable traces of cancer 1

CANCER 1.7 M 609,000 26% 15.5 M 73% JUST THE FACTS. More Than 1,100 Cancer Treatments in Clinical Testing Offer Hope to Patients

Corporate Medical Policy

ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION FOR ACUTE MYELOBLASTIC LEUKEMIAS

Clinical Policy: Donor Lymphocyte Infusion

Navigating Treatment Pathways in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Johann Hitzler, MD, FRCPC, FAAP Jacqueline Halton, MD, FRCPC Jason D. Pole, PhD

Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Is there still an indication? Celine Bicquart, MD Radiation Medicine May 5, 2010

ANCO 2015: Treatment advances in acute leukemia

Charlie: I was just diagnosed with CLL, so my doctor and I are now in the process of deciding what

Framework for Defining Evidentiary Standards for Biomarker Qualification: Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Clinical Guidelines for Lymphoid Diseases Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Initial Clinical Guidance Report Blinatumomab (Blincyto) for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia February 4, 2016

Richter s Syndrome: Risk, Predictors and Treatment

Indication for unrelated allo-sct in 1st CR AML

Dr Claire Burney, Lymphoma Clinical Fellow, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, UK

Adult ALL: NILG experience

Acute myeloid leukemia: prognosis and treatment. Dimitri A. Breems, MD, PhD Internist-Hematoloog Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Campus Stuivenberg

Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CAR)

Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative Institute of Medicine

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Matt Ahearne Clinical Lecturer, Leicester

Tasigna. Tasigna (nilotinib) Description

Pediatric Oncology: Vaccination After Therapy Family Practice Oncology CME Day November 2017

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EHA/ICML Bendamustine in the Treatment of Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Malignancies Treated with an Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant

Previous Study Return to List Next Study

a resource for physicians Recommended Referral Timing for Stem Cell Transplant Evaluation

London Cancer ALL guidelines

Precision CAR T Cell Therapeutics. Carl June October 15, 2018

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 18 July 2012

Form 2011 R4.0: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Pre-HCT Data

Symptom Control During Chemotherapy (SCDC) MN Community Measurement

FGSZ Zrt. from 28 February 2019 till 29 February 2020 AUCTION CALENDAR: YEARLY YEARLY BUNDLED AT CROSS BORDER POINTS

Engineering an Immunity to Cancer: A New Era of Adoptive Cellular Therapy with Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) in Pediatric ALL

Transcription:

ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA YOUNG ADULT PATIENT Highlights clonoseq Tracking (MRD) Testing in the peripheral blood revealed early signs of relapse post-transplant Patient achieved remission after CAR-T trial Patient continues to be monitored for MRD with peripheral blood samples

Physician s Perspective * When we rely on morphology alone, we are often surprised when a patient s bone marrow looks beautiful at day 80 post-transplant and then six months later they show up with circulating blasts, so posttransplant, it is my standard of care to assess the patient s MRD by clonoseq. This patient was MRD-positive in the peripheral blood 6 months post-transplant. MRD continued to rise in additional follow-up assessments in the peripheral blood and bone marrow. It is important to note that during this -month period of positive clonoseq (MRD) Tracking Test results, the patient was flow cytometry MRD-negative. As we could identify the impending relapse early based on the rising trend in MRD, I decided to refer the patient for the trial. I continue to monitor the patient s MRD in the peripheral blood about every - months. TOTAL CLONAL CELLS/ TOTAL NUCLEATED CELLS 0-0 - 0-0 -4 0-0 -6 FEB 04 APR IDENTIFIED DOMINANT SEQUENCE(S) 4 AUG 6 DEC FEB COLLECTION DATE APR AUG 7 ID MRD Test (Blood) MRD Test (Bone marrow) Patient History Late-0s female with diagnosed 9 months post-partum Refractory to Hyper-CVAD + Linker regimen Received allogenic transplant in late 04 Post-transplant flow cytometry results were MRD-negative for an additional three months while clonoseq peripheral blood and bone marrow results were MRD-positive Patient could enroll in CAR-T trial as the relapse was detected early and the patient still met the study eligibility criteria * Clinician has received compensation to participate in advisory meetings sponsored by Adaptive. Clinician s research has also been supported, in part, via product grants. ** Results may vary. clonoseq results should only be used taking into account all available clinical information and should not be used as the sole determinant to guide patient care and management. Use of the clonoseq Assay ** Transplant physician sent bone marrow sample for clonoseq (ID) Test so that clonoseq (MRD) Tracking could be carried out post-transplant. Day 90 post-transplant, the patient was MRD-negative by clonoseq. months later, the clonoseq (MRD) Tracking Test revealed the presence of measurable residual disease (MRD). 4 Repeat peripheral blood and bone marrow clonoseq results were MRD-positive. During this time, the patient was MRD-negative by flow cytometry. Patient enrolled in CAR-T study. 6 Post-CART therapy, the patient was MRD-negative in the bone marrow. 7 The patient continues to be monitored by clonoseq Tracking (MRD) Test in the peripheral blood every - months, and is MRD-negative as of the latest assessment.

ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA YOUNG ADULT PATIENT Highlights Post-transplant clonoseq Tracking (MRD) Testing revealed measurable residual disease (MRD); flow cytometry results did not detect measurable residual disease MRD continued to decline until patient became MRD-negative Patient continues to be monitored for MRD with peripheral blood samples

IDENTIFIED DOMINANT SEQUENCE(S) ID Physician s Perspective * This patient was told that he was MRD-negative in the bone marrow by flow cytometry when he was referred to me for transplant. My standard of care is to take a peripheral blood clonoseq Tracking (MRD) test prior to transplant. This test showed that the patient was MRD-positive. My experience is that patients who are MRD-negative prior to transplant have better outcomes post-transplant. TOTAL CLONAL CELLS/ TOTAL NUCLEATED CELLS 0-0 - 0-0 -4 0-0 -6 4 MRD Test (Blood) MRD Test (Bone marrow) JUL NOV DEC JAN 07 FEB 07 MAR 07 APR 07 MAY 07 SEP 07 COLLECTION DATE Patient History Use of the clonoseq Assay ** Mid-0s male with Patient received pediatric induction regimen followed by consolidation therapy Pre-transplant flow cytometry MRD was negative and clonoseq Tracking (MRD) Test was MRD-positive. Patient received allogenic stem cell transplant Immunosuppression therapy was discontinued post-transplant Prior to transplant, the patient was MRD-negative in the bone marrow by flow cytometry. The patient was MRD-positive in the peripheral blood by clonoseq. The patient then received an ASCT in November. Day 8 post-transplant, the patient continued to have a high level of MRD present in the peripheral blood. Due to this, immunosuppression was discontinued. Day 60 post-transplant, the clonoseq (MRD) Tracking Test detected only malignant cell in,000,000 total nucleated cells. Patient continues to be monitored by clonoseq Tracking (MRD) Tests with peripheral blood samples * Clinician has received compensation to participate in advisory meetings sponsored by Adaptive. Clinician s research has also been supported, in part, via product grants. 4 To confirm response in the bone marrow, MRD was assessed by clonoseq Day 90 post-transplant. The result was MRD-negative. MRD will continued to be monitored by the clonoseq Tracking (MRD) Test in the peripheral blood. About months posttransplant, the patient continues to be MRD-negative in the peripheral blood. **Results may vary. clonoseq results should only be used taking into account all available clinical information and should not be used as the sole determinant to guide patient care and management.

ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA ADULT PATIENT Highlights Sensitivity of clonoseq MRD Test allowed for early detection of relapse in post-transplant adult patient Physician began preparations for patient enrollment in CAR-T clinical trial

Physician s Perspective * When we rely on morphology alone, we are often surprised when a patient s bone marrow looks beautiful at day 80 post-transplant and then six months later they show up with circulating blasts. For this patient, the sensitivity of the clonoseq MRD Test allowed for early disease detection, providing me with time to prepare my patient and his other doctors for what would come next, which in this case was enrollment in a CAR-T cell clinical trial. When the follow-up MRD test came back positive and at a higher level (time-point 4), everything was already in place. My patient was able to move on to his next treatment while still relatively healthy and he was pleased that the latest technologies were guiding his treatment. TOTAL CLONAL CELLS/ TOTAL NUCLEATED CELLS 0-0 - 0-0 -4 0-0 -6 JUL 04 SEP 04 NOV 04 IDENTIFIED DOMINANT SEQUENCE(S) JAN MAR MAY 4 JUL ID MRD Test (Bone marrow) COLLECTION DATE Patient History Late 0s male with no medical history diagnosed with precursor B- (normal cytogenetics) in June 04 No significant bone marrow response seen after initial induction (on day 4) or extended induction (day 8) Refractory to salvage therapy with morphologic disease persisting in bone marrow, so referred for allo-transplant Disease burden too high for immediate transplant, so patient was enrolled in a clinical trial of a CD-targeted antibody drug conjugate After one cycle of trial therapy patient was in morphological remission but with MRD detected by flow cytometry at 0 -, so decision was made to proceed to transplant Unrelated donor, ablative transplant carried out November 04 * Clinician has received compensation to participate in advisory meetings sponsored by Adaptive. Clinician s research has also been supported, in part, via product grants. **Results may vary. clonoseq results should only be used taking into account all available clinical information and should not be used as the sole determinant to guide patient care and management. Use of the clonoseq Assay ** Transplant physician sent bone marrow sample for clonoseq Clonality (ID) Test before patient was enrolled in clinical trial so that clonoseq MRD tracking could be carried out post-transplant. 80 days post-transplant, patient s bone marrow showed no evidence of disease by morphology or flow cytometry. Blood counts were normal and MRD was undetectable by clonoseq. 70 days post-transplant, patient s bone marrow showed no evidence of disease by morphology or standard flow cytometry, but MRD was detected by clonoseq. Based on this result, immunosuppression was tapered off. 4 0 days post-transplant, patient s bone marrow showed no evidence of disease by morphology or standard flow cytometry, but MRD again detected by clonoseq, this time at a higher level. The patient s MRD level continued to rise, confirming that the patient was proceeding to clinical relapse and supporting decision to enroll in a CAR-T clinical trial. At 0 days post-transplant, increased disease burden as assessed by clonoseq was also detected for the first time by flow cytometry.

ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA PEDIATRIC PATIENT Highlights clonoseq Tracking (MRD) testing revealed early signs of relapse post-transplant. Physician had opportunity to prepare options for follow-up treatment, allowing him to act quickly once relapse was confirmed.

Physician s Perspective * When a patient has morphologic relapse, you feel anxious and need to act. Knowing that a patient is relapsing by detecting disease at a much lower level gives us a window of time to prepare instead of having to act immediately when a kid comes in with packed marrow and a fever. Once a positive MRD test comes back, I increase the frequency of testing in order to stay on top of disease. In the case of this patient, upon the first positive MRD test, we banked T cells in case the patient was eligible for an immunotherapy trial. Once he relapsed, I enrolled him immediately in a CAR-T trial, and since that treatment two years ago he has been in remission. People say that there is no advantage to detecting disease earlier, but that s changing. We have new transplant modalities, immunotherapies like blinatumumab, and many CAR trials available, so detecting disease early may be advantageous to the patient. TOTAL CLONAL CELLS/ TOTAL NUCLEATED CELLS 0-0 - 0-0 -4 0-0 -6 0 SEP 0 04 AUG 04 IDENTIFIED DOMINANT SEQUENCE(S) 4 04 DEC 04 FEB COLLECTION DATE APR 6 AUG ID MRD Test (Bone marrow) Patient History Pre-adolescent male diagnosed with B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia Decision to proceed to allotransplant was made after low-level MRD remained following several rounds of chemotherapy Patient received unrelated donor transplant in early 04. Patient s chimerism was dropping post-transplant but patient remained MRDnegative by flow. NGS detected MRD+ in April. Five months later, MRD+ detected by flow Patient recurred in September and was enrolled in CAR-T therapy trial in November * Clinician has received compensation to participate in advisory meetings sponsored by Adaptive. Clinician s research has also been supported, in part, via product grants. **Results may vary. clonoseq results should only be used taking into account all available clinical information and should not be used as the sole determinant to guide patient care and management. Use of the clonoseq Assay ** Physician ordered Clonality (ID) test so that he would have freedom to use clonoseq MRD testing in the future if desired. MRD was detectable at 0, 60 and 90 days post-transplant. The patient was clonoseq MRD-negative in the bone marrow at 4,, 6, 7, 8, and 9 months post-transplant. 4 One year post-transplant, MRD was detected by clonoseq ( leukemic molecule / million cells). The patient remained MRDnegative by flow. Assessment of chimerism revealed that patient had lost his graft. Physician made decision to conduct monthly clonoseq MRD evaluation. The patient s MRD continued to rise month over month. Options for further treatment discussed; decision made to bank T cells for potential CAR-T treatment. 6 MRD continued to increase, and morphologic relapse was observed (7 months after initial positive MRD test). Patient received CAR-T therapy in November as part of a trial and has been in remission for years.

Learn more at clonoseq.com Contact Adaptive Clinical Services (888) 8988 clinicalservices@adaptivebiotech.com The clonoseq Assay is regulated under CLIA and has not been cleared or approved by the FDA. clonoseq should only be used taking into account all available clinical information. Copyright 08 Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp. All rights reserved. PM-US-cSEQ-007 PM-US-cSEQ-007 PM-US-cSEQ-0049 PM-US-cSEQ-0074 clonoseq.com