PORTICO CE TRIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE ST. JUDE MEDICAL PORTICO TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANT AND THE TRANSFEMORAL DELIVERY SYSTEM

Similar documents
Multicentre clinical study evaluating a novel resheatable self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve system

AMPLATZER Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder

Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation System. portico PRECISION

BEFORE AND AFTER YOUR MRI SCAN. For patients with St. Jude Medical neurostimulation systems for chronic pain

ViewFlex Xtra ICE Catheter. Positioning Reference Manual

2015 ST. JUDE MEDICAL THERAPY CODING GUIDE Cardiac Pacemakers

Trifecta Valve. Clinical Compendium. Five Year Data

introducing Quantien Integrated FFR Platform Free Your Cath Lab with Wireless FFR

1-YEAR OUTCOMES FROM JOHN WEBB, MD

2016 ST. JUDE MEDICAL THERAPY CODING GUIDE Cardiac Pacemakers

30-day Outcomes of The CENTERA Trial a New Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve. Didier Tchétché, MD On Behalf of the CENTERA Investigators

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic valve stenosis with the ACURATE neo2 valve system: 30-day safety and performance outcomes

A predictable pattern in renal denervation. EnligHTN. Multi-Electrode Renal Denervation System. For the Treatment of Hypertension

Make the Connection A clinical compendium on the relationship between AF, stroke, and early intervention

PressureWire Agile Tip Technology

Ian T. Meredith AM. MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FCSANZ, FACC, FAPSIC. Monash HEART, Monash Health & Monash University Melbourne, Australia

Outcome of Next-Generation Transcatheter Valves in Small Aortic Annuli: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Comparison

PATENT FORAMEN OVALE CLOSURE

30-Day Outcomes Following Implantation of a Repositionable Self-Expanding Aortic Bioprosthesis: First Report From the FORWARD Study

Portico (St. Jude Medical Inc, St.

An Update on the Edwards TAVR Results. Zvonimir Krajcer, MD Director, Peripheral Intervention Texas Heart Institute at St.

INSERTABLE CARDIAC MONITORS FROM ATRIAL FIBRILLATION TO SYNCOPE:

FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE STANDARDIZED

Current Evidence in TAVI patients using ACURATE and LOTUS valves

Nouvelles indications/ Nouvelles valves

Edwards Transcatheter AVR: Have the Outcomes Changed after CE Approval?

Edwards' solution for patients suffering from tricuspid valve disease

HOW IMPORTANT ARE THESE ECHO MEASUREMENTS ANYWAY?

The St. Jude Medical Biocor Bioprosthesis

Progress In Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Aortic Stenosis and TAVR TARUN NAGRANI, MD INTERVENTIONAL AND ENDOVASCULAR CARDIOLOGIST, SOMC

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis

One-year outcomes with the transcatheter LOTUS Edge Aortic Valve System

CIPG Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement- When Is Less, More?

TAVR IN INTERMEDIATE-RISK PATIENTS

AMPLATZER Septal Occluder Structural Heart Therapy. Over 15 years of. Demonstrated. Clinical Experience. We ll show you our data. Ask to see theirs.

Pacemaker rates Second generation TAVI Devices

DRG THERAPY FOR CHRONIC PAIN PAIN INTER- RUPTED LIFE TRANSFORMED

Establishing a New Path Forward for Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis THE PARTNER TRIAL CLINICAL RESULTS

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Current and Future Devices: How do They Work, Eligibility, Review of Data

Establishing the New Standard of Care for Inoperable Aortic Stenosis THE PARTNER TRIAL COHORT B RESULTS

Edwards Sapien. Medtronic CoreValve. Inoperable FDA approved High risk: in trials. FDA approved

TAVR today: High Risk, Intermediate Risk Population, and Valve in Valve Therapy

Incorporating the intermediate risk in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Clinical Data Summary: Avoid FFS Study

Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU European Society of Cardiology

DRG THERAPY FOR CHRONIC PAIN ACCURATE CLINICAL STUDY FACT SHEET FOR PATIENTS

TRANSAPICAL AORTIC VALVE REPAIR

Australia and New Zealand Source Registry Edwards Sapien Aortic Valve 30 day Outcomes

2/28/2010. Speakers s name: Paul Chiam. I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: NONE. Antegrade transvenous transseptal route

Vascular complications of embolized core valve

LOW RISK TAVR. WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. SSVQ November 23, 2012 Centre Mont-Royal 15:40

Supplementary Online Content

TAVR in Intermediate Risk Populations /Optimizing Systems for TAVR

Peri-operative results and complications in 15,964 transcatheter aortic valve implantations from the German Aortic valve RegistrY (GARY)

Is TAVR Now Indicated in Even Low Risk Aortic Valve Disease Patients

TAVR SPRING 2017 The evolution of TAVR

Is TAVR the treatment of choice for high risk diabetic patients with aortic stenosis? Insights from the FRANCE2 Registry

TAVI in Rabin Medical Center -

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with Evolut-R

SAPIEN 3: Evaluation of a Balloon- Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve in High-Risk and Inoperable Patients With Aortic Stenosis One-Year Outcomes

Eberhard Grube MD, FACC, FSCAI

Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) in Inoperable Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The PARTNER Trial

Results of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

APOLLO TMVR Trial Update: Case Presentation

ACCESS-EUROPE Phase I

CoreValve Evolut R Technology review and Clinical Results. Paul TL Chiam

PATIENT CONTROLLER ST. JUDE MEDICAL UNDERSTANDING IMPORTANT FEATURES ON YOUR

Lotus Valve System for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation/Replacement (TAVI/R) Evidence

TAVI- Is Stroke Risk the Achilles Heel of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Repair?

Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation. Core-Valve and Cribier-Edwards Update

Le TAVI pour tout le monde?

PAIN INTER- DRG THERAPY FOR CHRONIC PAIN RUPTED LIFE TRANSFORMED

Introducing the COAPT Trial

TAVR : Caring for your patients before and after TAVR

TAVI: Nouveaux Horizons

Surgical AVR: Are there any contraindications? Pyowon Park Samsung Medical Center Seoul, Korea

Early Experience of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Results from the Intrepid Global Pilot Study

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients:

Aortic Stenosis: Background

Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair

2/15/2018 DISCLOSURES OBJECTIVES. Consultant for BioSense Webster, a J&J Co. Aortic stenosis background. Short history of TAVR

NEXT-GENERATION TAVR. A look at the future of percutaneous valve replacement.

The FORMA Early Feasibility Study: 30-Day Outcomes of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapy in Patients with Severe Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation

Alec Vahanian,FESC, FRCP (Edin.) Bichat Hospital University Paris VII, Paris, France

Outcomes in the Commercial Use of Self-expanding Prostheses in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparison of the Medtronic CoreValve and

Case Presentations TAVR: The Good Bad and The Ugly

22/06/2017. Oxford City. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement 2017 guidelines. 1. First time I have heard about it. 2.

Update on Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair and Replacment

I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Other(s): Proctor for Medtronic for TAVI cases using the CoreValve/Evolut R devices

My Choice For Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement. Jose Luis Navia, MD.

Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes at 30 Days with the SAPIEN 3 TAVR System in Inoperable, High-Risk and Intermediate-Risk AS Patients

Aortic Valve Practice Guidelines: What Has Changed and What You Need to Know

Valve Replacement without a Scalpel Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Charles T. Klodell, M.D.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Repositionable Self-expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Suboptimal for

16 YEAR RESULTS Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Mitral Pericardial Bioprosthesis, Model 6900

Ray Matthews MD Professor of Clinical Medicine Chief of Cardiology University of Southern California

Is TAVI ready for prime time in: - Intermediate risk patients? - Low risk patients?

PARTNER 2A & SAPIEN 3: TAVI for intermediate risk patients

Transcription:

PORTICO CE TRIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE ST. JUDE MEDICAL PORTICO TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANT AND THE TRANSFEMORAL DELIVERY SYSTEM Preliminary Results: Acute and 1-Year Outcomes Ganesh Manoharan, MBBCh, MD, FRCP Consultant Cardiologist Royal Victoria Hospital Belfast, UK CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. ID200029 A EN (12/13) 1

Challenges of TAVR Procedures Control and placement accuracy Paravalvular aortic regurgitation Development of heart block necessitating permanent pacemaker implantation Vascular access Associated complication rate G Manoharan, Presentation TCT, October, 2013 ID200029 A EN (12/13) 2

Portico Overview Self-expanding stent designed to be: Fully resheathable* Repositionable* (proximally and distally*) in-situ Retrievable* Nonflared annulus section of the stent frame Portico 23 mm: 19 21 mm Portico 25 mm: 21 23 mm Bovine leaflets and porcine pericardial sealing cuff Transfemoral delivery system compatible with 18 F introducer sheath Leaflet functionality after partial deployment, allowing controlled deployment without rapid pacing Aortic Section Annulus Section The 23 mm Portico system is approved for CE Mark. Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use *Until fully deployed Nonflared annulus section ID200029 A EN (12/13) 3

Study Design Objective Design Primary Endpoint To assess the safety and performance of the St. Jude Medical Portico heart valve and the St. Jude Medical transfemoral transcatheter delivery system in subjects with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Prospective; non-randomized; multi-center trial Max 50 subjects for each valve size Study included 23 mm and 25 mm Portico valves F/U at discharge, 30 d, 3 mo., 6 mo., 12 mo. All-cause mortality at 30 days Lead Investigators Ganesh Manoharan, MBBCh, MD, FRCP Thomas Walther, MD, PhD ID200029 A EN (12/13) 4

Secondary Endpoints Safety: Adverse Event Rates (VARC Definitions) Cardiovascular mortality Myocardial infarction (MI) Disabling stroke (Major Stroke) Efficacy: Functional improvement from baseline as compared to 30 days NYHA Functional Classification Six Minute Walk Test Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Non-disabling stroke (Minor Stroke) Acute kidney injury (AKI) Vascular access site and access-related complications Bleeding Composite of periprocedural encephalopathy, all stroke, all TIA ID200029 A EN (12/13) 5

Study Clinical Centers Heart Team Center 23 mm n (%) Ganesh Manoharan, MD* Mark Spence, MD Jan Kovac, MD* Raj Rajendra, MD / Amerjeet Banning, MD Martyn Thomas, MD* Simon Redwood, MD Thomas Walther, MD, PhD* Helge Möllmann, MD David Holzhey, MD* Axel Linke, MD Karl-Heinz Kuck, MD, PhD* Ulrich Schäfer MD, PhD Royal Victoria Hospital (Belfast, UK) 25 mm n (%) Total n (%) 10 (20) 10 (30.3) 20 (24.1) Glenfield Hospital (Leicester, UK) 7 (14) 2 (6.1) 9 (10.8) St. Thomas Hospital (London, UK) Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH (Bad Nauheim, DE) Universität Leipzig Herzzentrum (Leipzig, DE) Asklepios Klinik St. Georg (Hamburg, DE) 8 (16) 1 (3.0) 9 (10.8) 7 (14) 4 (12.1) 11 (13.3) 18 (36) 12 (36.4) 30 (36.1) --------- 4 (12.1) 4 (4.8) * Principal Investigator All sites 50 (100) 33 (100) 83 (100) ID200029 A EN (12/13) 6

Baseline Characteristics Characteristic All Subjects Age, yrs 83.8 ± 4.9 Gender % Female 96.3% NYHA class II NYHA class III/IV 22.2% 77.8% STS score (mortality) 6.1 ± 3.4 Logistic EuroSCORE 16.3 ± 7.9 Aortic valve area (cm 2 ) 0.6 ± 0.2 Mean gradient (mmhg) 45.6 ± 13.1 Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) 65.6 ± 11.9 6 minute walk (meters) 167 ± 110 ID200029 A EN (12/13) 7

Baseline Risk Factors Risk Factor Incidence n=82 Coronary artery disease 47.6% Renal failure/insufficiency 35.4% Pulmonary hypertension 26.3% PTCA with stent 17.1% Carotid artery disease 15.9% Myocardial infarction 11.0% Transient Ischemic Attack 9.8% Cerebral Vascular Accident 9.8% Permanent pacemaker 7.3% Peripheral vascular disease 6.1% Coronary artery bypass 4.9% Cerebral vascular disease 3.7% Porcelain Aorta 3.7% Risk Factor Incidence (n) Cardiac arrhythmia 54.9% (45/82) Atrial fibrillation 48.9% (22/45 ) Left bundle branch block 11.1% (5/45) Other arrhythmia 44.4% (20/45) ID200029 A EN (12/13) 8

Procedural Information Parameter Anaesthesia type* - Local - Conscious sedation - General All Subjects 56.6% 32.5% 36.1% Procedure Time (mins) 40.0 ± 19.0 Multiple valves in same subject 4.8% (4) Valve Resheathed - Resheath successful - Placement in recommended landing zone 23.2% (19) 100% 91% (17) Depth of implant into LV (mm) 5.8 ± 2.7 * ~20% of patients had a combination of local and conscious sedation ID200029 A EN (12/13) 9

Clinical Safety Results As adjudicated by clinical events committee Event 30 day Rate (%) (per subject basis)* n=83 Overall Rate (%) day 1 up to 1 year (per subject basis)* n=83 8.4 4.8 3.6 2.4 Death - Cardiovascular Death 3.6 3.6 Disabling (Major) stroke 2.4 Non-disabling (Minor) stroke 1.2 New pacemaker implantation 10.8 10.8 Myocardial infarction 1.2 1.2 Acute kidney injury 9.6 10.8 - Stage 3 AKI 2.4 3.6 Major vascular complication 6.0 6.0 Minor vascular complication 3.6 3.6 Life threatening or disabling bleeding* 2.4 2.4 Major bleeding* 10.8 14.5 Minor bleeding* 16.9 16.9 * Four adverse events adjudicated both as Bleeding (Life threatening = 1, Major bleed = 2, Minor bleed = 1) and Vascular complication events are presented as only Vascular Complications ID200029 A EN (12/13) 10

Core Laboratory Echo Results Changes observed from baseline to 30 days are sustained at the 12-month follow-up Mean Gradient Average Mean Gradient (mmhg) 60 50 40 30 20 10 45.6 8.7 9.4 9.8 9.8 Peak Gradient 80 72.1 p =<.0001 p =<.0001 60 Average Peak Gradient (mmhg) 40 20 16.6 17.7 18.2 18.5 Average Peak Gradient (mmhg) 0 Peak Velocity 500 400 300 200 100 Baseline 30 days 3 months 6 months 12 months n=61 n=59 n=44 n=33 n=31 421.5 199.7 208.4 210.4 211.8 0 Valve Area 2 p =<.0001 p =<.0001 Average Ao Valve Area (cm 2 ) 1.5 1 0.5 Baseline 30 days 3 months 6 months 12 months n=61 n=59 n=44 n=33 n=31 0.6 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.6 0 Baseline 30 days 3 months 6 months 12 months n=61 n=59 n=44 n=33 n=31 0 Baseline 30 days 3 months 6 months 12 months n=58 n=56 n=42 n=33 n=30 ID200029 A EN (12/13) 11

Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation 100% 30 Days (n=57) 6 Months (n=31) 80% 60% 65% Moderate to Severe 5% 68% Moderate to Severe 3% 40% 30% 29% 20% 0% 5% 3% 0% 0% 2 PVL at 30 days and 1 at 6 months were reported between categories by the core lab and were included in the lesser category. ID200029 A EN (12/13) 12

NYHA Classification 100% 90% 3% 2% 0% 0% 14% 16% 21% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 75% 52% 37% 42% NYHA IV NYHA III NYHA II NYHA I 30% 20% 10% 22% 33% 47% 36% 0% Baseline 30 Days 6 Month 12 Month ID200029 A EN (12/13) 13

6 Minute Walk Test Baseline (n=69) 167 30 days (n=56) 194 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Meters ID200029 A EN (12/13) 14

Conclusions The results suggest that TAVR with the St. Jude Medical Portico system produces clinically meaningful and sustained improvements in patient outcomes. Preliminary data on the Portico 23 mm and 25 mm valves demonstrate exceptional hemodynamic performance and improvements in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. The 18 F St. Jude Medical Portico system with resheathable technology allows for precise and reproducible valve placement. This study establishes an excellent safety profile with the 18 F Portico system depicted by low rates of pacemaker implantation, moderate-severe PV leak, vascular complications, stroke and death. CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. ID200029 A EN (12/13) 15

ID 200029 A EN (12/13) 16 St. Jude Medical Inc. Global Headquarters One St. Jude Medical Drive St. Paul, Minnesota 55117 USA +1 651 756 2000 +1 651 756 3301 Fax St. Jude Medical International Division One Lillehei Plaza St. Paul, Minnesota 55117 USA +1 651 756 2000 +1 651 756 2291 Fax St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. U.S. Division 6300 Bee Cave Road Bldg. Two, Suite 100 Austin, TX 78746 USA +1 512 732 7400 +1 512 732 2418 Fax SJM Coordination Center BVBA The Corporate Village Da Vincilaan 11-Box F1 B-1935 Zaventem, Belgium +32 2 774 68 11 +32 2 772 83 84 Fax St. Jude Medical Brasil Ltda. Rua Itapeva, 538 5º ao 8º andares 01332-000 São Paulo SP Brazil +55 11 5080 5400 +55 11 5080 5423 Fax St. Jude Medical (Hong Kong) Ltd. Suite 1608, 16/F Exchange Tower 33 Wang Chiu Road Kowloon Bay, Kowloon Hong Kong SAR +852 2996 7688 +852 2956 0622 Fax St. Jude Medical Japan Co., Ltd. Shiodome City Center 15F 1-5-2 Higashi Shinbashi, Minatoku Tokyo 105-7115 Japan +81 3 6255 6370 +81 3 6255 6371 Fax St. Jude Medical Australia Pty, Ltd. 17 Orion Road Lane Cove, NSW 2066 Australia +61 2 9936 1200 +61 2 9936 1222 Fax SJMprofessional.com Rx Only Brief Summary: Prior to using these devices, please review the Instructions for Use for a complete listing of indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, potential adverse events and directions for use. Unless otherwise noted, indicates that the name is a trademark of, or licensed to, St. Jude Medical or one of its subsidiaries. ST. JUDE MEDICAL and the ninesquares symbol are trademarks and service marks of St. Jude Medical, Inc. and its related companies. 2013 St. Jude Medical, Inc. All Rights Reserved.