EVALUATION OF SPEECH PERCEPTION IN PATIENTS WITH SKI SLOPE HEARING LOSS USING ARABIC CONSTANT SPEECH DISCRIMINATION LISTS

Similar documents
Acoustics, signals & systems for audiology. Psychoacoustics of hearing impairment

Healthy Organ of Corti. Loss of OHCs. How to use and interpret the TEN(HL) test for diagnosis of Dead Regions in the cochlea

A FRESH Approach to Pediatric Behavioral Testing

AUDL GS08/GAV1 Signals, systems, acoustics and the ear. Pitch & Binaural listening

Hearing Aids. Bernycia Askew

A good audiologic diagnosis is increasingly more important

Cochlear Implants. What is a Cochlear Implant (CI)? Audiological Rehabilitation SPA 4321

doi: /brain/awn308 Brain 2009: 132; Enhanced discrimination of low-frequency sounds for subjects with high-frequency dead regions

Hearing Lectures. Acoustics of Speech and Hearing. Auditory Lighthouse. Facts about Timbre. Analysis of Complex Sounds

COM3502/4502/6502 SPEECH PROCESSING

Audiology Curriculum Foundation Course Linkages

SOLUTIONS Homework #3. Introduction to Engineering in Medicine and Biology ECEN 1001 Due Tues. 9/30/03

ABSTRACT EQUALIZING NOISE (TEN) TEST. Christine Gmitter Doctor of Audiology, 2008

Fitting of the Hearing System Affects Partial Deafness Cochlear Implant Performance

Hearing Evaluation: Diagnostic Approach

FREQUENCY. Prof Dr. Mona Mourad Dr.Manal Elbanna Doaa Elmoazen ALEXANDRIA UNIVERSITY. Background

Auditory Physiology PSY 310 Greg Francis. Lecture 30. Organ of Corti

Chapter 11: Sound, The Auditory System, and Pitch Perception

Welcome to Cochlear Dead Regions and Implications for Fittings. Presenter: Audiologist, Speaker, Author. IHS Organizers: Housekeeping

HCS 7367 Speech Perception

Diagnosis and Management of ANSD: Outcomes of Cochlear Implants versus Hearing Aids

But, what about ASSR in AN?? Is it a reliable tool to estimate the auditory thresholds in those category of patients??

Who are cochlear implants for?

Introduction to Audiology: Global Edition

An Update on Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder in Children

Can You Hear Me Now? Learning Objectives 10/9/2013. Hearing Impairment and Deafness in the USA

Audiogram+: The ReSound Proprietary Fitting Algorithm

FREQUENCY COMPRESSION AND FREQUENCY SHIFTING FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED

Emissions are low-intensity sounds that may be detected in the external ear canal by a microphone

Audiogram+: GN Resound proprietary fitting rule

In patients with moderate to severe high-frequency hearing

What Is the Difference between db HL and db SPL?

first described by Starr 1996 as a subgroup of patients with

REFERRAL AND DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION OF HEARING ACUITY. Better Hearing Philippines Inc.

HEARING IMPAIRMENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES: Divisions of the Ear. Inner Ear. The inner ear consists of: Cochlea Vestibular

PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL AUDITORY ASSESSMENT

Systems Neuroscience Oct. 16, Auditory system. http:

Hearing Loss: From Audiogram to RFC Learn How to Effectively Represent Deaf and Hard of Hearing Claimants

Peter S Roland M.D. UTSouthwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas Developments

Lecture Outline. The GIN test and some clinical applications. Introduction. Temporal processing. Gap detection. Temporal resolution and discrimination

Prelude Envelope and temporal fine. What's all the fuss? Modulating a wave. Decomposing waveforms. The psychophysics of cochlear

Hello Old Friend the use of frequency specific speech phonemes in cortical and behavioural testing of infants

Cochlear Implant Corporate Medical Policy

Issues faced by people with a Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Music and Hearing in the Older Population: an Audiologist's Perspective

ID# Exam 2 PS 325, Fall 2003

Signals, systems, acoustics and the ear. Week 1. Laboratory session: Measuring thresholds

Medical Affairs Policy

Effects of flight on auditory function in pilots

Best Practice Protocols

Brad May, PhD Johns Hopkins University

HEARING. Structure and Function

Implantable Treatments for Different Types of Hearing Loss. Margaret Dillon, AuD Marcia Adunka, AuD

Hearing. istockphoto/thinkstock

What is sound? Range of Human Hearing. Sound Waveforms. Speech Acoustics 5/14/2016. The Ear. Threshold of Hearing Weighting

Essential feature. Who are cochlear implants for? People with little or no hearing. substitute for faulty or missing inner hair

What you re in for. Who are cochlear implants for? The bottom line. Speech processing schemes for

THRESHOLD PREDICTION USING THE ASSR AND THE TONE BURST CONFIGURATIONS

Hearing the Universal Language: Music and Cochlear Implants

Sonic Spotlight. Frequency Transfer Providing Audibility For High-Frequency Losses

Frequency refers to how often something happens. Period refers to the time it takes something to happen.

PSY 214 Lecture # (11/9/2011) (Sound, Auditory & Speech Perception) Dr. Achtman PSY 214

9/13/2017. When to consider CI or BAHA evaluation? Krissa Downey, AuD, CCC A

The Benefits of Bimodal Hearing for Adults and Children: Effect of Frequency Region and Acoustic Bandwidth René H. Gifford, PhD

Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda Alan R. Palmer Ray Meddis Editors. The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception

Essential feature. Who are cochlear implants for? People with little or no hearing. substitute for faulty or missing inner hair

Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes after Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation

FREQUENCY LOWERING IN THE PEDIATRIC POPULATION: OUTCOMES AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR FITTING. Capstone. Lauren Virginia Ross, B.A.

On the physiological location of otoacoustic emissions

Lecture 3: Perception

Sound Waves. Sensation and Perception. Sound Waves. Sound Waves. Sound Waves

Prescribe hearing aids to:

C HAPTER FOUR. Audiometric Configurations in Children. Andrea L. Pittman. Introduction. Methods

Effects of Setting Thresholds for the MED- EL Cochlear Implant System in Children

Outline ANATOMY OF EAR. All about Cochlear implants/why does this child not have a Cochlear Implant?

Hearing Screening, Diagnostics and Intervention

INTRODUCTION TO PURE (AUDIOMETER & TESTING ENVIRONMENT) TONE AUDIOMETERY. By Mrs. Wedad Alhudaib with many thanks to Mrs.

Long-Term Performance for Children with Cochlear Implants

Masker-signal relationships and sound level

Comment by Delgutte and Anna. A. Dreyer (Eaton-Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA)

Acoustics Research Institute

DIAGNOSIS Causes/Etiology of Hearing Loss

Audibility, discrimination and hearing comfort at a new level: SoundRecover2

Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder. Yvonne S. Sininger PhD Professor of Head & Neck Surgery University of California Los Angeles

Strategies Used in Feigning Hearing Loss

2) What is the most robust distortion product evoked with DPOAEs? A. F1 B. F2 C. 2F1-F2 D. 2F2 F1

Speech Cue Weighting in Fricative Consonant Perception in Hearing Impaired Children

FALSE POSITIVE DP GRAMS

Bone Anchored Hearing Aids

Cochlear Implants: The Role of the Early Intervention Specialist. Carissa Moeggenberg, MA, CCC-A February 25, 2008

Spectrograms (revisited)

ID# Exam 2 PS 325, Fall 2009

CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL HEARING AIDS

Guidance on Identifying Non-Routine Cases of Hearing Loss

Prediction of Loudness Growth in Subjects with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Auditory Steady State Response. Afaf A. Emara

Representation of sound in the auditory nerve

ClaroTM Digital Perception ProcessingTM

Interpreting Speech Results to Optimise Hearing aid Fittings

Characterizing individual hearing loss using narrow-band loudness compensation

Assessing Hearing and Speech Recognition

Transcription:

EVALUATION OF SPEECH PERCEPTION IN PATIENTS WITH SKI SLOPE HEARING LOSS USING ARABIC CONSTANT SPEECH DISCRIMINATION LISTS Mai El Ghazaly, Resident of Audiology Mohamed Aziz Talaat, MD,PhD Mona Mourad. MD,PhD Audiology Unit. Alex. University. 1

Ski slope hearing loss is a sharply falling configuration 30 db loss between 2 successive high frequencies. Low frequencies thresholds remain about normal. Fricatives Stops Effect of high frequency slope on audition: 1. Patients with ski slope hearing loss often miss out consonants (especially fricatives) and have difficulties understanding speech in background noise. 2. Individuals with cochlear high frequency hearing loss may score (80-100%) on PB word lists and still have difficulty understanding conversation. 3. Pure tone thresholds and speech discrimination for PBWLs may under estimate communication difficulties. 2

Distribution of speech sounds in relation to ski slope hearing loss Frequency in Hz Cochlear dead regions Dead regions in the cochlea may be hidden in ski slope hearing loss where the inner hair cells and/or associated neurons function poorly. Mechanical vibration at a particular region of the basilar membrane will not cause signal transduction into its electrical counterpart. 3

Cochlear dead regions As a consequence, high frequency speech sounds are not transduced at their anatomical region. These sounds are still detected via neurons that are tuned to lower frequencies with a different CF. Edge frequency fe is the CF of IHC and neurons adjacent to a dead region. This is a phenomenon called off-frequency listening. Cochlear dead regions 4

Evaluation of cochlear dead regions: A. Suspect from the audiogram: Threshold > 90 db at any high frequency Audiometric slope > 50 db/octave with increasing frequency Evaluation Masking of Paradigm cochlearprocedures dead regions: : B. Masking paradigm tests: Psychophysical Tuning Curves A research set up lacks precision in bracketing a dead region. A clinical test has the merit of accurate bracketing a cochlear dead region. 5

Evaluation of cochlear dead regions: C. Speech discrimination tests: Consonants speech discrimination tests will assess phoneme recognition difficulties for high frequency hearing loss listeners. Cochlear dead regions are expected to negatively influence performance on such speech tests. Rehabilitation for ski slope hearing loss includes: Amplification by Conventional hearing aids as open fit, RIC hearing aids if dead regions are absent. Amplification by Frequency transposition algorithm if dead regions are present. Auditory nerve stimulation by Cochlear implant. 6

Cochlear implant in patients with dead regions Patients with extensive dead regions may be candidates for CI versus hearing aid. Acoustic and electric stimulation may be a further consideration for ski slope losses. This poses crucial decisions of electrode insertion depth and frequency mapping. Ski slope is a Hybrid candidate Hybrid device 7

Aim of the work 1 Evaluate patients speech perception with ski sloping high frequency hearing loss on Arabic high frequency emphasis speech materials. 2 Evaluate the possible effect of high frequency dead regions on such performance. 8

The study was conducted on 20 patients: Literate adults. Bilateral steep sloping high frequency SNHL with: Normal to moderate loss at 250-500 Hz. Mild to moderately severe loss at 1000 Hz. Severe to total loss at 2000 to 8000 Hz. 9

Each patient was subjected to the following: 1. History, PTA(AC&BC) and immitance measures. 2. TEN (HL) test for diagnosis of cochlear dead regions. 3. Monosyllabic phonetically balanced word lists. 4. Modified Arabic consonant speech discrimination lists. TEN (HL) test Test procedure Threshold is measured for puretone detection presented in ipsilateral broadband noise using a recorded CD. The signals from the CD two-channel audiometer, noise on one channel & test tones on the other channel. Both channels are routed to one ear. 10

1-Pure tone thresholds are measured. 2-Then masked thresholds are measured in presence of broadband noise. Test tones are 500, 750, 1000, 1500, 2000, 3000 and 4000 Hz. A dead region is BRACKETED when The masked threshold is at least 10 db above the absolute threshold & 10 db above the nominal noise level. List #1: 120 sense-words. List #2: 156 non-sense words. Lists are constructed in multiple choice items for closed set response. Each set consists of four monosyllabic words. The syllabic structure is C V C. Words of a given item differ only in one phoneme either in initial or final position. All words were subjected to spectral analysis & tested on patients with high frequency hearing loss. 11

. SWL (50 words) 24 for fricatives NSWL (52words) 26 for fricatives 18 for stops 18 for stops 4 for nasals 4 for nasals 4 for laterals 4 for laterals 12

Non sensible word list اوك For the word Sensible word list فيل For the word ميل فيل جيل تيل دوك حوك نوك اوك Recording The 2 lists were recorded separately & were introduced to the patient through MADSEN ASTERA audiometer. A carrier phrase )) كلمة ))ردد precedes the tested word. The carrier phrase and the tested word occupy 5 seconds followed by 5 seconds of silence. Each list took about 8.5 minutes. 13

Introduction to the patient The patient has to choose the word heard from a closed set of words that differ from the test word in only the test consonant either initial or final. The test score was reported as a percentage of the correct responses. Probability of error for a phoneme = Total errors for a type of consonant across subjects Total stimuli for that consonant across subjects % Probability of error for each class of consonant = Total errors for a class of consonant across subjects Total stimuli for that class across subjects % 14

Intensity in db HL 4/10/2014-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Frequency in Hz 15

Intensity in db HL Intensity in db HL 4/10/2014 No Dead Regions 18 Dead regions 22 DR at 4000Hz only 11 DR 2000-4000Hz 6 DR 1000-4000Hz 5-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Frequency in Hz Frequency in Hz 16

Percent of ears with DRs 4/10/2014 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100.00 54.55 22.73 0.00 0.00 250 500 1000 2000 4000 Frequency NDR (n=18) DR (n=22) t 1 P Arabic consonant discrimination lists Phonetically balanced discrimination lists 75.32 ± 10.70 61.54 ± 12.98 3.678 * 0.001 * 80.0 ± 6.44 68.09 ± 10.19 4.301 * <0.001 * t 2 2.525 * 2.871 * P 0.022 * 0.009 * 17

Percentage correct 4/10/2014 NDR (n=18) DR (n=22) t P Fricatives 70.09±12.41 58.22±12.86 2.950 * 0.005 * Stops 80.56±10.99 63.13±19.74 3.526 * 0.001 * Nasals 72.22±26.97 64.77±16.65 1.023 0.315 Laterals 88.89±15.39 68.18±25.80 2.993 * 0.005 * All 75.32±10.70 61.19±13.11 3.678 * 0.001 * 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DR only at 4000Hz DR 2000-4000 Hz DR 1000-4000HZ 18

NDR (n=18) DR (n=22) t P Fricatives 29.91±12.42 41.78±12.85 2.950 * 0.005 * Stops 19.44±10.99 36.87±19.74 3.526 * 0.001 * Nasals 27.78±26.97 35.23±16.65 1.023 0.315 Laterals 11.11±15.39 31.82±25.80 2.993 * 0.005 * All 24.68±10.70 38.81±13.11 3.678 * 0.001 * 19

1. In this study, speech tests using consonant sounds have proved to be effective in determining the performance that reflects spectral regions affected by cochlear pathology. 2. Masking techniques were pioneering evaluation of cochlear reserves and dead regions but not highlighting the parallel speech perception. 3. Because rehabilitation options are increasing with technical development rehabilitation decision should be based on realistic measures. The most important of which is evaluating speech perception that targets specific cochlear regions which may vary widely from very limited affection when dead regions affect very narrow cochlear partition to much degraded performance in extensive dead regions. 20

4. The realistic assessment is expected to display the shortcomings of the pathology that affects speech perception. In this respect masking techniques that uncover cochlear non-functioning areas together with high frequency emphasis speech tests are synergistic in bracketing one or more regions of the cochlea that are not functioning and their effect on speech perception. 21