Use of Glycerol as a Corn Replacement in Calf Starter Diets Project number: AIC044 Project date: July 7, 2010

Similar documents
Nursery calf feeding and management strategies to promote starter intake and intestinal health

Calf Notes.com. Calf Note 194 Does more growth equal more milk? Introduction

DIET DIGESTIBILITY AND RUMEN TRAITS IN RESPONSE TO FEEDING WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND A PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

COMPLETE LACTATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF COWS FED WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

EFFECTS OF FEEDING WHOLE COTTONSEED COATED WITH STARCH, UREA, OR YEAST ON PERFORMANCE OF LACTATING DAIRY COWS

Lambs & Fieldpeas Sheep Day Report. Field Pea as a feedstuff for growing lambs. Introduction

The Effects of Feeding MIN-AD and Sodium Bicarbonate on Early Lactation Performance of Dairy Cattle

Optimum production or income over feed cost during the subsequent lactation occurs with 50- to 70-day dry periods.

THE INFLUENCE OF CORN SILAGE HYBRID VARIETY ON BEEF STEER GROWTH PERFORMANCE. Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph

Forage Testing and Supplementation

Dairy Feed 14% - Textured

Dried Distillers Grains and(or) Soybean Hulls to Background Beef Calves Fed Bahiagrass Forage

Colostrum. The Co-op Calf Program

F. M. Ciriaco, D. D. Henry, V. R. G. Mercadante, T. Schulmeister, M. Ruiz-Moreno, G. C. Lamb, N. DiLorenzo

Tom s 20 Questions to Determine Where Your Herd is T.P. Tylutki PhD Dpl ACAN AMTS LLC

INCREASING PERFORMANCE OF GROWING CATTLE AFTER WEANING USING COTTONSEED AND COTTONSEED MEAL SUPPLEMENTS

product feeds contain highly digestible fiber, which could potentially provide an alternative

What did we learn about shredlage? Sally Flis, Ph.D. Feed and Crop Support Specialist, Dairy One. Project Summary

EFFECT OF A REVALOR-G IMPLANT AND SOURCE OF SUPPLEMENTAL PROTEIN ON WEIGHT GAIN OF STEERS WINTERED ON DORMANT TALLGRASS PRAIRIE OR OLD WORLD BLUESTEM

THE INFLUENCE OF CORN SILAGE FEEDING LEVEL ON BEEF STEER GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY

Overview of Completed DDGS Swine Research

Evaluation of Condition Scoring of Feeder Calves as a Tool for Management and Nutrition

D. Price 1, M. Hersom 1, J. Yelich 1, M. Irsik 2, O. Rae 2

Calf Notes.com. Calf Note #146 Waste milk vs. milk replacer, revisited

The Effect of MIN-AD on Performance and Health in Early Lactation Dairy Cows

FAT SUPPLEMENTATION FOR BEEF CATTLE: EFFECT ON REPRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY AND CALF GROWTH

Effect of Glycerol Level in Feedlot Finishing Diets on Animal Performance V.L. Anderson and B.R. Ilse NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center

Introduction. Introduction. Condition at Birth. Accelerated Growth: How We Can Influence Her Development

Benefits and Limitations of Using DDGS in Swine Diets

Performance of Beef Calves Provided Molasses-Based Creep Supplements

Achieving Maximum Growth Potential of Replacement Heifers Through Management and Nutrition. Robert B. Corbett DVM, PAS Dairy Health Consultation

EFFECT OF WHEY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE SOURCE ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF NURSERY PIGS

Industry. Feeding Swine. Energy. US Per Capita Meat Consumption. Gain (Tissue accretion) Maintenance ME

TRANSITION COW NUTRITION AND MANAGEMENT. J.E. Shirley

CHANGES IN RUMINAL MICROBIAL POPULATIONS IN TRANSITION DAIRY COWS

Effects of Chitosan on Enteric Methane Production and Nutrient Digestibility of Beef Heifers

Providing a Legacy of Herd Profitability

Keeping Control of Feed Costs in an Uncertain Market

EFFECTS OF LEVEL OF ALFALFA HAY IN STEAM-FLAKED CORN BASED DIETS CONTAINING 25% SORGHUM WET DISTILLER S GRAINS. Summary.

Effects of Different Feed Mills and Conditioning Temperature of Pelleted Diets on Nursery Pig Performance and Feed Preference from 14 to 50 lb

An Evaluation of Peptone Products and Fish Meal on Nursery Pig Performance 1

Grower-Finisher Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Pigs Fed Genetically Modified Bt Corn

Exercise 6 Ration Formulation II Balance for Three or More Nutrients 20 Points

Effects of AV-E Digest and XFE Liquid Energy on Nursery Pig Performance 1

Exercise 2 Feed Composition and Nutrient Requirements 20 Points

Research Report Forage Sorghum Hybrid Yield and Quality at Maricopa, AZ, 2015

Economics and Effects of Accelerated Calf Growth Programs

Effects of increasing the energy density of a lactating ewe diet by replacing grass hay with soybean hulls and dried distillers grains with solubles 1

Quality and Composition of Beef from Cattle Fed Combinations of Steam-flaked Corn, Dry-rolled Corn, and Distiller's Grains with Solubles

FACTORS AFFECTING MANURE EXCRETION BY DAIRY COWS 1

FEEDING VALUE OF WET DISTILLERS GRAINS FOR LACTATING DAIRY COWS WHEN CO-ENSILED WITH CORN SILAGE OR HAYCROP SILAGE

ALFALFA LEAF MEAL IN BEEF STEER RECEIVING DIETS

COMPARISON OF INTERNATIONAL PROTEIN CORPORATION 740 FISH MEAL AND SPECIAL SELECT MENHADEN FISH MEAL IN NURSERY PIG DIETS

EFFECT OF FEEDING HIGH OR LOW FAT MANUFACTURED LIQUID DIETS TO PIGS WEANED FROM THE SOW AT 10 DAYS OF AGE

The effects of corn silage feeding level on steer growth performance, feed intake and carcass composition.

Use of Alaska Grown Whole Seed Canola in Dairy Cattle Diets Year 2

THE EFFECTS OF ENERGY AND PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS ON SPRING-CALVING COWS

Product Purpose Statement for Commercial Feed Eli Miller University of Kentucky Lexington, KY May 15, 1997

PROCEDURES: Spruce Haven Farm and Research Center, Auburn, NY.

Feeding Value of DDGS for Swine, Dairy, and Beef. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

INCLUSION OF FAT IN DIETS FOR EARLY LACTATING HOLSTEIN COWS. J. E. Shirley and M. E. Scheffel

Effect of Various Levels of Forage and Form of Diet on Rumen Development and Growth in Calves

Effect of FuzZpellet on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle

THE INFLUENCE OF DIETARY FAT LEVEL AND CRYSTALLINE AMINO ACID ADDITIONS ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF 25- TO 50-LB PIGS 1

BEEF Postruminal flow of glutamate linearly increases small intestinal starch digestion in cattle 1

Feeding the Doe Herd. Lyle W. McNichol PAg. Lyle McNichol Livestock Consulting Services

Growing Calf and Show Steer Feed Management 1

EFFECTS OF PEPSOYGEN AND DRIED PORCINE SOLUBLES 50 IN NURSERY PIG DIETS 1

Feeding and Managing a Herd for 100 Pounds of Milk/Day - Thinking Outside the Normal Paradigm

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS

Effects of a Novel Protease Enzyme (CIBENZA DP100) on Finishing Pig Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics 1

Matching Hay to the Cow s Requirement Based on Forage Test

!"#$%&'%()$*+%%$,-.$/"01)$! "$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

EFFECTS OF A LIQUID (NEOLAC 1 ) AND DRY FEED COMBINATION FED IN VARYING DURATIONS ON WEANLING PIG PERFORMANCE

EFFECTS OF FOUR SOYBEAN MEAL PRODUCTS ON LACTATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF DAIRY COWS. M. S. Awawdeh, E. C. Titgemeyer, J. S. Drouillard, and J. E.

Feeding Animals for Profit - Will my 2017 hay cut it?

Use of Distiller s s Dried Grains plus Solubles in Poultry Feeding Trials at the University of Georgia. University of Georgia

The Use of Distiller s Grains By-products in Livestock and Poultry Diets. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

High Plains Biofuels Co-Product Nutrition Conference. February 20, Garden City, KS.

EFFECT OF WHEAT BRAN SUBSTITUTION FOR CORN AND DEHYDRATED ALFALFA ON FINISHING LAMBS. Abstract

Does Raising a Successful Calf Begin with Mom?

Effects of Reduced Dietary CP and P on Nutrient Excretion of Finisher Pigs

A Comparison of MIN-AD to MgO and Limestone in Peripartum Nutrition

Effects of different feed mills and conditioning temperature of pelleted diets on nursery pig performance and feed preference from 14 to 50 lb

The Effects of Wheat and Crystalline Amino Acids on Nursery and Finishing Pig Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics 1

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENT SOURCE ON INTAKE, DIGESTION AND RUMINAL KINETICS OF STEERS FED PRAIRIE HAY. Authors:

Benefits and Limitations of Using DDGS in Swine Diets. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Evaluation of Heparin Production By-Products in Nursery Pig Diets 1

Effect of the Frequency of Corn Supplementation on a High Quality Alfalfa Hay Utilization by Cattle

Using dietary crude protein to manipulate energy balance in early lactation dairy cows

Effects of Varying Rates of Tallgrass Prairie Hay and Wet Corn Gluten Feed on Productivity of Dairy Cows

Economic Impact of Removing Pigs Before Marketing on the Remaining Pigs Growth Performance 1

Effect of Prenatal Trace Mineral Source on Neonatal and Growing Calf Liver and Serum Mineral Status

Effect of Energy Level and a Fibrolytic Enzyme on Performance and Health of Newly Received Shipping Stressed Calves

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames. 4

AN EVALUATION OF ASTAXANTHIN AS A NUTRACEUTICAL GROWTH PROMOTER IN STARTER DIETS FOR WEANLING PIGS 1

Dietary Supplements: A Necessity or Folly?

Natural-Pork. Swine Feeding Program

Effects of Monosodium Glutamate and AminoGut on Nursery Pig Performance

Oilseed Meal Processing and Feeding Trials. William Gibbons Michael Brown, Jill Anderson South Dakota State University

Transcription:

Use of Glycerol as a Corn Replacement in Calf Starter Diets Project number: AIC044 Project date: July 7, 2010 Acknowledgement Financial support from the United States Department of Energy, Golden, Colorado, Gibon Asuquo, Project Officer, and research assistance provided by the University of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center is greatly appreciated.

Summary Report 07/06/10 Project Number: 9-244 and 9-245 Title: Use of Glycerol as a replacement for corn in starter diets for individually fed dairy calves up to 9 weeks of age and in grain mixes during group feeding from 9 to 25 weeks of age. Location(s): University of Minnesota, Calf and Heifer Research Facility, Southern Research and Outreach Center (SROC), Waseca, MN. Co-investigators Collaborators Hugh Chester-Jones, Dairy/Beef Animal Scientist, SROC, Waseca David Ziegler, Scientist, SROC, Waseca Al Doering, Agricultural Utilization Research Institute (AURI) Denny Timmerman, AURI Greg Golombeski, Graduate Student, Animal Science, St. Paul Mary Raeth-Knight, Research Fellow, U of MN Animal Science, St. Paul Background & Justification: Glycerol is a sugar alcohol by-product of bio-diesel production. About 1 gallon of glycerin is produced for every 10 gallons of bio-diesel of which the glycerol content may vary between 63 and almost 100%. There is some uncertainty of the exact energy value of glycerol as an ingredient for animal feed but it has been successfully used as a replacement for corn up to 10% of the diet dry matter for lactating dairy cows. There is a lack of information on incorporating glycerol into diets for pre- and post weaned dairy heifer calves which has the potential to expand the market for this by product. Preliminary work at SROC indicates that there are no palatability problems using glycerol up to 6% of the mix in post weaning pellets for group fed dairy heifers. Objectives: To evaluate the use of glycerol as a replacement for corn in diets on performance and health of dairy calves individually fed from 2 days up to 9 weeks of age and group fed from 9 to 25 week of age. Animals and Methods Study Overview Phase 1 to 56 day study:- One hundred-twenty calves housed in individual pens from 3 commercial dairy farms were assigned to one of four 18% crude protein (CP) calf starters (25 calves/treatment) upon arrival at SROC at 2-4 days of age. Isocaloric and isonitrogenous starter diets included: 1), Complete texturized control; 2), Complete pellet control; 3), Complete pellet with 3% glycerol replacing corn; 4), Complete pellet with 6% glycerol replacing corn. All diets were full fed with access to fresh water. All calves were fed a 20% protein:20% fat medicated milk replacer at 0.625 lbs in 4.4 lbs of water twice daily for 35 days and once daily from day 36 to weaning at 42 days. Calves continued to be full-fed their respective diets post weaning from day 43 to the end of the study at 56 days. Bodyweights were taken

initially and on days 14, 28, 42, and 56. Hip heights will be taken initially and at day 56. Daily feed intake and health records were documented for each calf. Phase 2 112 day study:- 105 calves from phase 1 were re-assigned to one of three grain mixes. Calves were fed the control 18% CP starter from phase 1 for 7 days after moving calves from individual to group pens of 7 calves/pen. Calves were then be transitioned to one of 3 corn/pellet grain mixes with 5 replicated group pens/treatment. Treatments included: 1), 16% CP corn and pellet grain mix control fed at 6 lbs/day for 84 days with free choice hay; 2), 16% CP corn and pellet grain mix with 3% glycerol fed as for treatment 1 for 56 days then 5 lbs/day from day 57 to 84; 3), 16% CP corn and pellet grain mix with 6% glycerol fed as for treatment 2. From days 85-112 all group pens will be fed a common diet of a 16% CP grain mix fed at 5 lbs/day with free choice hay. Bodyweights were taken initially and on days 28, 56, 84 and 112. Hip heights were taken initially, days 84 and 112. Daily feed intake and health records were documented for each group pen. Statistical analyses: Data were analyzed using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS and repeated measures analyses applied where appropriate. Contrasts were used to differentiate treatment combination effects. Results and Discussion Phase 1 nursery phase - The nutrient composition of the diets fed during the nursery phase are summarized in Table 1. The complete pellet consisted of the same ingredient composition to the complete texturized starter. The quality of pellet was very good and the addition of 3 or 6% glycerin maintained the quality. The crude protein content of the respective starters were within the specifications expected. Performance of calves are summarized in Tables 2 and 3 with health data summarized in Table 4. There were no treatment differences in pre- and post weaning growth during the nursery phase. Optimal performance goals during the nursery phase are for calves to double their initial body weight with a frame growth of 4 inches by 2 months of age. Calves averaged 1.84 times their initial body weight with 3.85 inches of frame growth (Table 2). There were no treatment differences in calf starter and total dry matter intake although there was a numerical trend towards lower intakes in calves fed the pellet with 6% glycerin (Table 3). Pre- and post weaning feed efficiencies were not affected by treatment and were very similar to previous studies. There were no treatment differences in pre- and post weaning fecal scores or pre-weaning scouring days. Post weaning scouring days tended to be higher for calves fed the texturized calf starter vs. those fed the pellet diets. Pre-weaning and overall treatment costs/calf were highest for calves fed the pellet with 6% glycerin. Conclusions for the nursery phase Under the conditions of this study formulating a calf starter pellet with the same nutrient specifications of a texturized calf starter was very successful. Partially replacing corn with 3 or 6% glycerin in a calf starter pellet was acceptable. There were indications that 6% glycerin may affect health costs. Phase 2 group feeding phase - Post weaning calf performance in group pens are summarized in Table 5, 6 and 7. Mixing 3 or 6% glycerin in a grain mix worked well for the 84 day period when treatments were applied. There were no treatment differences in calf growth within each of the 28 day weigh periods (Table 5). Body weight gain overall for the 112 days study was also similar across all calf groups. As expected grain intake was similar across calf groups during the 84 day treatment period and

overall, days 1 to 112 (Table 6). Numerically hay intake tended to be lower for calves fed the glycerin diets. This was reflected in overall hay and total dry matter intake which was higher for the control calf groups vs. those fed the glycerin diets which were not different. However, feed efficiencies were not affected by glycerin treatments days 1 to 84 or when all calves were fed a common diet form days 85 to 112. There were no treatment differences in changes in body condition score or hip height gain (Table 7). Conclusions for the group feeding phase Under the conditions of this study partially replacing corn in grain mixes with 3 or 6% glycerin did not affect calf performance when fed in group pens with free choice hay from 9 to 25 weeks of age, Study conclusions overall - Glycerol can be used as an alternative energy source as a partial replacement for corn in starter diets at 3 or 6% of the total formulation for individually fed dairy calves up to 9 weeks of age and similarly in grain mixes during group feeding from 9 to 25 weeks of age.the current study confirmed a previous study with post weaned heifer calves in group pens which indicated up to 6% glycerin can effectively replace corn in grain mixes. Contrary to the current study, the previous study found that heifer calves fed a 16% crude protein grain mix pellet containing 6% glycerin for 84 days had improved daily gain compared to heifers fed pellets with no or 3% glycerin. Heifers fed the grain mix pellet containing 3 or 6% glycerin for 84 days with free choice hay also had improved feed efficiency compared to heifers fed pellets without glycerin included. These differences were not maintained when all heifers were fed a common whole corn and pellet mix from days 85 to 112. However, daily gains and feed intake during the current study tended to be better than in the previous study. Acknowledgements: The financial support of AURI was much appreciated. Thanks to the SROC dairy staff for excellent care and management of the calves during the study

Table 1. Nutrient composition of milk replacer and calf starters (CS) 1 Item Milk replacer CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4 DM, % 98.36 87.79 89.02 88.43 88.51 CP, % 19.94 21.18 20.70 22.12 21.30 Fat, % 19.81 3.58 1.52 2.34 2.31 NDF, % ---- 13.88 17.72 16.00 15.93 ADF, % ---- 6.09 9.25 8.80 9.45 Ash, % 9.25 6.32 7.50 7.48 7.66 Ca, % 0.89 1.18 1.25 1.23 1.15 P, % 0.82 0.59 0.57 0.57 0.58 K, % 2.62 1.36 1.24 1.25 1.15 Mg, % 0.16 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.32 Na, % 1.13 0.22 0.25 0.31 0.38 Cu, ppm 13.4 30.2 27.8 17.0 21.9 Fe, ppm 24.4 138.2 235.4 237.2 263.5 Mn, ppm 31.0 104.0 105.5 79.8 93.7 Zn, ppm 29.6 137.7 137.9 96.8 117.8 1 CS1 = complete texturized; CS2 = complete pellet; CS3 = complete pellet with 3% glycerin; CS4 = complete pellet with 6% glycerin.

Table 2. Growth parameters day 1 to 56 of study. Treatments 1 Control 2 3 4 SEM 1 vs 2, 3, 4 No calves 30 30 30 30 Contrasts 2 vs. 3, 4 1 vs 3, 4 BW, lb Initial 2 88.5 88.6 88.7 88.5 1.7 d 14 96.5 96.6 95.9 96.1 0.63 d 28 114.6 114.7 113.7 113.6 0.95 d 42 134.5 135.1 135.7 133.2 1.36 d 56 164.0 164.1 163.3 160.5 1.93 Total BW gain, lb d 1 to d 42 46.1 46.4 47.4 44.5 1.35 0.99 0.76 0.93 d 1 to d 56 75.6 75.6 75.0 72.2 1.68 0.50 0.35 0.34 ADG, lb/d d 1 to 14 0.55 0.55 0.51 0.54 0.05 d 15 to 28 1.31 1.30 1.29 1.25 0.05 d 29 to 42 1.43 1.47 1.59 1.40 0.06 d 1 to 42 1.10 1.10 1.13 1.06 0.03 0.99 0.76 0.93 d 43 to 56 2.12 2.08 1.98 1.95 0.07 d 1 to 56 1.35 1.35 1.34 1.29 0.03 0.50 0.35 0.34 HH, inches Initial 3 31.5 31.6 31.6 31.7 0.17 d 56 35.5 35.5 35.4 35.2 0.13 0.46 0.26 0.28 HH gain, inches d 1 to 56 3.94 3.94 3.87 3.67 0.13 0.46 0.26 0.28 1 Treatments: 2 Initial body weight (BW) utilized as a covariate for body weight, ADG and intake data when significant. 3 Initial hip height (HH) utilized as a covariate for hip height (d 56) and hh gain. a,b Means within a row without common superscripts are different at P < 0.05.

Table 3. Milk replacer, starter and total DM intake and feed efficiency. Treatments Contrasts Control 2 3 4 SEM 1 vs 2, 3, 4 2 vs. 3, 4 1 vs 3, 4 Milk Replacer -----------% DM basis-------- Intake, lb/d d 1 to 14 1.21 1.23 1.22 1.22 0.004 d 15 to 28 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24 0.004 d 29 to 42 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.004 d 1 to 42 1.12 1.13 1.13 1.13 0.002 0.12 0.48 0.22 Total MR intake, lb d 1 to 42 47.2 47.4 47.3 47.3 0.1 0.12 0.48 0.22 Starter intake, by period, lb/d d 1 to 14 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.02 d 15 to 28 0.71 0.67 0.71 0.63 0.06 d 29 to 42 1.64 1.69 1.82 1.51 0.09 d 43 to 56 4.23 4.19 4.16 3.91 0.12 Total Starter intake, lb d 1 to d 42 1 34.5 34.5 37.3 31.0 1.86 0.91 0.89 0.88 d 1 to d 56 93.5 93.2 95.2 85.7 3.64 0.62 0.54 0.50 Total DM intake by period, lb/d d 1 to 14 1.32 1.33 1.33 1.30 0.02 d 15 to 28 1.94 1.91 1.95 1.86 0.06 d 29 to 42 2.56 2.61 2.74 2.43 0.09 d 43 to 56 4.24 4.26 4.16 3.92 0.12 Total DM intake, lb d 1 to d 42 2 81.7 81.9 84.6 78.3 1.87 0.96 0.86 0.92 d 1 to d 56 140.8 140.8 142.8 133.2 3.52 0.72 0.64 0.63 Feed per Gain d 1 to 42 1.79 1.78 1.80 1.77 0.03 0.79 0.83 0.86 d 43 to 56 2.11 2.07 2.17 204 0.07 0.86 0.65 0.99 d 1 to 56 1.88 1.87 1.92 1.86 0.03 0.99 0.69 0.89 1 Treatment P = 0.13 2 Treatment P = 0.12

Table 4. Serum protein and health data Treatments Contrasts Control 2 3 4 SEM 1 vs 2, 3, 4 2 vs. 3, 4 1 vs 3, 4 Serum Protein 5.40 5.47 5.31 5.44 0.10 0.96 0.43 Fecal Score 1 Period d 1 to 14 1.64 1.51 1.49 1.55 0.06 d 15 to 28 1.32 1.32 1.27 1.36 0.04 d 29 to 42 1.13 1.16 1.15 1.14 0.03 d 43 to 56 1.23 1.15 1.17 1.27 0.04 d 1 to 42 1.35 1.31 1.30 1.34 0.02 0.28 0.81 0.35 d 1 to 56 1.33 1.28 1.27 1.33 0.02 0.21 0.60 0.31 Scouring days 2 # Days 3 1 to 42 3 2.10 1.39 1.65 2.32 0.30 0.37 0.11 0.75 43 to 56 0.28 0.05 0.14 0.18 0.08 0.08 0.23 0.22 # Days = 4 1 to 42 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.001 0.02 0.61 0.13 0.97 Treatment cost, $ 1 to 42 0.52 a 0.44 a 0.30 a 1.21 b 0.21 0.57 0.21 0.34 43 to 56 3 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.17 0.99 0.21 0.67 1 to 56 0.61 a 0.37 a 0.24 a 1.64 b 0.26 0.65 0.07 0.30 1 Fecal score = 1 to 4; 1 = normal, 3 = scours 2 Scouring day = any day with a fecal score 3. 3 Treatment P = 0.13 a,b Means within a row without common superscripts are different at P < 0.05.

Table 5. Growth parameters d 1 to 112 of grower period. Treatments 1 Contrasts Control 2 3 SEM 1 vs. 2, 3 2 vs. 3 No. pens 5 5 5 (7 hfrs/pen) BW 2, lb Initial 185.8 186.6 186.7 1.55 d 28 247.1 248.7 248.8 1.85 d 56 310.7 314.2 315.6 1.77 d 84 375.8 374.7 378.4 2.23 d 112 443.2 440.8 442.2 2.93 d 1 to 112 344.2 344.6 346.3 1.88 0.59 0.52 ADG 2, lb/d d 1 to 28 2.18 2.22 2.22 0.07 d 29 to 56 2.27 2.34 2.38 0.07 d 57 to 84 2.33 2.15 2.24 0.07 d 85 to 112 2.41 2.36 2.29 0.07 d 1 to 112 2.30 2.27 2.28 0.03 0.32 0.58 BWG 2, lb d 1 to 28 61.0 62.2 62.2 1.96 d 29 to 56 63.6 65.5 66.6 1.96 d 57 to 84 65.2 60.2 62.7 1.96 d 85 to 112 67.5 66.1 64.1 1.96 Total gain, lb d 1 to 112 257.6 254.2 255.4 3.36 1 Treatments 2 Initial body weight (BW) during the starter period (study 8-242) utilized as a covariate for body weight and ADG when significant. a,b Means within a row without common superscripts are different at P < 0.05.

Table 6. Grain and hay intake day 1 to 112 of grower period. Treatments 1 Contrasts Control 2 3 SEM 1 vs. 2, 3 2 vs. 3 No. pens 5 5 5 (7 hfrs/pen) Grain Intake, ------------------% DM basis---------------- lb/d d 1 to 28 5.28 5.32 5.35 0.02 d 29 to 56 5.35 5.32 5.34 0.02 d 57 to 84 4.50 4.47 4.47 0.02 d 84 to 112 4.49 4.49 4.45 0.02 d 1 to 112 4.90 4.90 4.90 0.01 0.86 0.87 Hay Intake, lb/d d 1 to 28 1.39 1.38 1.27 0.06 d 29 to 56 4.39 4.12 4.10 0.13 d 57 to 84 6.87 6.54 6.50 0.12 d 84 to 112 8.48 8.34 8.08 0.12 d 1 to 112 5.28 5.10 4.99 0.08 0.02 0.32 Total Intake, lb/d d 1 to 28 6.67 6.70 6.61 0.07 d 29 to 56 9.75 9.44 9.44 0.14 d 57 to 84 11.4 11.0 11.0 0.12 d 84 to 112 13.0 12.8 12.5 0.13 d 1 to 112 10.2 10.0 9.89 0.08 0.02 0.37 Feed to Gain, DM/lb d 1 to 28 3.08 3.02 2.99 0.08 d 29 to 56 4.30 4.06 3.96 0.12 d 57 to 84 4.91 5.11 4.91 0.14 d 84 to 112 5.41 5.45 5.49 0.13 d 1 to 112 4.43 4.41 4.34 0.05 0.38 0.28 a,b Means within a row without common superscripts are different at P < 0.05.

Table 7. Body condition score and hip height day 1 to 112 of grower period. Treatments Contrasts Control 2 3 SEM 1 vs. 2, 3 2 vs. 3 No. pens 5 5 5 (7 hfrs/pen) BCS Initial 2.98 3.00 2.98 0.03 d 56 3.44 3.41 3.36 0.07 d 112 3.76 3.84 3.77 0.04 d 1 to 112 3.60 3.62 3.57 0.05 0.83 0.57 BCS Change d 1 to 112 0.78 0.84 0.79 0.04 0.53 0.47 HH, inches 1 d 1 36.3 36.5 36.4 0.13 d 56 40.8 41.1 41.3 0.21 d 112 44.3 44.4 44.4 0.16 1 to 112 40.5 40.7 40.7 0.12 0.16 0.98 HH gain 1, in. d 1 to 112 7.93 7.98 8.00 0.16 0.79 0.95 1 Initial hip height during the starter period (study 8-242) utilized as a covariate. a,b Means within a row without common superscripts are different at P < 0.05.