Toxicological tool. Sarah O Meara, PhD, MSc PharmMed Non-clinical Assessor. GMP Conference 12 th November 2014

Similar documents
Guideline on setting health based exposure limits for use in risk identification in the manufacture of medicinal products

Cross Contamination & the EU GMP Guide. Bryan J Wright July 2017

Basic Principles of API Risk Assessment

New Annex 15 Updated Requirements & Approach to Validation. Presented by Ashley Isbel 10 th August 2015

STUDIES TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF RESIDUES OF VETERINARY DRUGS IN HUMAN FOOD: GENERAL APPROACH TO ESTABLISH AN ACUTE REFERENCE DOSE

SCIENTIFIC / TECHNICAL REPORT submitted to EFSA

Use of TTC and Human Relevance George E. N. Kass, PhD

General Chapter/Section: <232> Elemental Impurities - Limits Expert Committee(s): General Chapters Chemical Analysis No.

Development of Genotoxic Impurities Control in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient

Proactive Integration of Occupational Toxicology Assessments into the Drug Development Process

Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Foods- WHO Principles and Methods

DISSERTATION MECHANISM-BASED THRESHOLDS OF TOXICOLOGICAL CONCERN (TTC) FOR DEVELPOMENTAL AND REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY OF ANTICANCER COMPOUNDS

cccta 17ème Journées Scientifiques, Les Diablerets VD

Impact of genotoxicity in risk assessment of pesticides, their metabolites and degradates

Regulation of Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Impurities in

Regarding Establishment of a Uniform Limit in a Positive List System concerning Agricultural Chemicals Residues in Food etc.

Risk Assessment in Drug Development (or How much of compound X is safe? ) (EYP 2006) Colin Fish

TNsG on Annex I Inclusion Revision of Chapter 4.1: Quantitative Human Health Risk Characterisation

PQRI PODP Extractables & Leachables Workshop Leachable Evaluation of a Container Closure System - What to do When Above the Threshold

Part 2. Chemical and physical aspects

The European Commission non-food Scientific Committees Scientific Committee on consumer safety - SCCS

Work plan for the joint CHMP/ CVMP Quality Working Party (QWP) for 2018

Regulatory update on guidelines relevant to paediatric formulations

Development of safe levels of elemental impurities

HOMEOPATHIC MEDICINAL PRODUCT WORKING GROUP (HMPWG)

Challenges and Strategies to Facilitate Formulation Development of Pediatric Drug Products

HMPWG - Questions and Answers on First safe Dilutions

CHAPTER 2: RISK ANALYSIS

Criteria for toxicological characterization metabolites and testing strategy

The Scientific Rationale for Deriving Database and Toxicodynamic Uncertainty Factors for Reproductive or Developmental Toxicants

Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC):

Dose response relationships: biological and modeling aspects

Introduction to principles of toxicology and risk assessment

Development of NJ Human Health-based Criteria and Standards

Methodologies for development of human health criteria and values for the lake Erie drainage basin.

Provisional Translation Original: Japanese

Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion and Toxicology

Contamination & Cross-contamination best practices New EU & PIC/S requirements. Presented by Gordon Farquharson August 2015

IMPURITIES: GUIDELINE FOR RESIDUAL SOLVENTS PDE FOR CUMENE

Chemical Name: Metolachlor ESA CAS: Synonyms: Ethanesulfonate degradate of metolachlor; CGA

E11(R1) Addendum to E11: Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Pediatric Population Step4

Threshold Establishment and Rationale. Douglas J Ball, MS, DABT Research Fellow Pfizer Worldwide R&D

Captan (Pesticides) Summary. Risk assessment report. Food Safety Commission of Japan. Conclusion in Brief

Genotoxicity Testing Strategies: application of the EFSA SC opinion to different legal frameworks in the food and feed area

Cancer thresholds, Cohort of Concern and other excluded substance groups

CHARACTERIZING THE IMPACTS OF UNCERTAINTY AND SCIENTIFIC JUDGMENT IN EXPOSURE LIMIT DEVELOPMENT

Draft Concept Paper. 05. Mai Seite 1 von 20

Food additives. FAO guidelines on the structure and content of the document called "Chemical and Technical Assessment (CTA)" Rome, February 2003

EFSA Info Session Pesticides 26/27 September Anja Friel EFSA Pesticides Unit (Residues team)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

Folpet (Pesticides) Summary. Risk assessment report. Food Safety Commission of Japan. Conclusion in Brief

11/29/2010 FOOD SAFETY CAPACITY BUILDING ON RESIDUE CONTROL

SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF FOOD CONTACT MATERIALS. Threshold of Toxicological Concern Lisette Krul

Technical Datasheet LIFTONIN -XPRESS. 1. Application and Storage. Page 1 of 6. Country of Origin. Nature of Raw Materials

Use of Bridging Justifications to Support the Safety of Excipients in Generic Drug Products

Overview of USP General Chapters <476> and <1086> Prescription/Non-Prescription Stakeholder Forum October 19, 2017

TTC NON-CANCER ORAL DATABASES

5.15 HEXYTHIAZOX (176)

Quantitative Risk Assessment: An Overview and Discussion of Emerging Issues. Anne-Marie Nicol, PhD

Thresholds of Toxicological Concern

EFSA Guidance on residue definition for dietary risk assessment

European public MRL assessment report (EPMAR)

Guideline on user safety for pharmaceutical veterinary medicinal products

Residual Solvents: FDA/ Regulatory Perspective

ICH Topic S1B Carcinogenicity: Testing for Carcinogenicity of Pharmaceuticals. Step 5

DOSE SELECTION FOR CARCINOGENICITY STUDIES OF PHARMACEUTICALS *)

Draft agreed by Excipients Drafting group 16 June Adopted by CHMP for release for consultation 23 July 2015

Poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), also called perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)

Chemical Name: Metolachlor OXA CAS: Synonyms: Oxanilic acid degradate of metolachlor

5.36 THIOPHANATE-METHYL (077)

Cycloxydim CYCLOXYDIM (179)

PMTC Knowledge Day 2017 August 31 st Cleaning validation hot topics. THOMAS ALTMANN. Global Technical Manager ECOLAB LIFE SCIENCES RD&E.

Guidance for Industry

Carcinogens in our food. Pesticide metabolites with (un)known carcinogenic potential end up in our food

Challenges in environmental risk assessment (ERA) for birds and mammals and link to endocrine disruption (ED) Katharina Ott, BASF SE, Crop Protection

FORUM The Threshold of Toxicological Concern Concept in Risk Assessment

Evaluation of Potential Human Health Effects from Environmental Exposure to Human Pharmaceuticals

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Joint meetrag of the Earopean Commission Scieatäfíc Committees and the Еигореав

Environmental Risk Assessment Toxicity Assessment

THE NON PENICILLIN BETA LACTAM DRUG CROSS CONTAMINATION PREVENTION; USFDA PERSPECTIVE

ANNEX IX STANDARD INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBSTANCES MANUFACTURED OR IMPORTED IN QUANTITIES OF 100 TONNES OR MORE ( 1 )

Threshold of Toxicological Concern Overview of Ongoing Scientific Developments

PHENOXY HERBICIDES CASE STUDY CONSIDERED IN CONTEXT OF ECHA RAAF

Risk Assessment Report on Tris (nonylphenyl)phosphite (TNPP)

Council of the European Union Brussels, 6 February 2017 (OR. en)

Organic Impurities in Drug Substances and Drug Products. Antonio Hernandez-Cardoso, M.Sc. Senior Scientific Liaison September 8, 2017

IPEC Europe Suggested Alternative (if none then original text is clear and needs no alteration) Purpose and Scope

Robert G. Sussman, Ph.D., DABT Managing Principal, Eastern Operations. SafeBridge Consultants, Inc. Mountain View, CA New York, NY Liverpool, UK

Dose and Response for Chemicals

International Safety Assessment of Sweeteners

Emanuela Turla Scientific Officer Nutrition Unit - EFSA

PQRI PODP Extractables & Leachables Workshop Derivation of the Parenteral Safety Concern Threshold (SCT)

Guideline on user safety of topically administered veterinary medicinal products

The Italian approach to the safety assessment of coatings intended for food contact application

VICH GL23: Studies to evaluate the safety of residues of veterinary drugs in human food: genotoxicity testing

The role of JECFA for CCFA

Perspectives on alternatives to thiomersal

Guideline on user safety of topically administered veterinary medicinal products

Iscador Qu 0.01 mg, 0.1 mg, 1 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, solution for injection

Tocopherols (E ) used in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age

Transcription:

Guideline on setting health based exposure limits for use in risk identification in the manufacture of different medicinal products in shared facilities Toxicological tool Sarah O Meara, PhD, MSc PharmMed Non-clinical Assessor GMP Conference 12 th November 2014

Disclaimer: Final approval is pending, but is expected soon 12th November 2014 2

Problem Statement No defined approach in deriving an acceptable limit Plethora of toxicological tools being used Lack of harmonised approach/interpretation Different production requirements Significant financial impact on manufacture Impaired quality of medicinal products Adverse effect on patient health 12th November 2014 3

Current Approach the philosophy has been to reduce the levels of residual product in each piece of equipment, such that no greater than 1/1000 th of the normal therapeutic dose or 10ppm will be present per typical dose of the next product to be run in the equipment. Available Pharmacological/Toxicological data? Possible exposure data? Too restrictive, not restrictive enough? 12th November 2014 4

Toxicological Tool Guideline on setting health based exposure limits for use in risk identification in the manufacture of different medicinal products in shared facilities -- (toxicological tool) Drafted by Safety Working Party at EMA Toxicologists (non-clinical assessors) Agreed with veterinary counterparts Public consultation January to June 2013 (concurrently with Chapter 3 & 5) EMA workshop on Dedicated Facilities (September 2013) 12th November 2014 5

Determination of health based exposure limit Permitted Daily Exposure (PDE) a substance-specific dose that is unlikely to cause an adverse effect if an individual is exposed at or below this dose every day for a lifetime ICH Q3C R(4) Impurities: Guideline for Residual Solvents VICH GL 18 residual solvents in new veterinary medicinal products, active substances and excipients (Revision) 12th November 2014 6

Determination of PDE 1) Hazard identification Review all relevant data, including: non clinical pharmacodynamic data repeat dose toxicity studies carcinogenicity studies in vitro & in vivo genotoxicity studies reproductive and developmental toxicity studies clinical data (therapeutic and adverse effects) Incomplete data sets Identify gaps Impact on a reliable health based exposure limit? 12th November 2014 7

Determination of PDE 2) Critical effects Identification of critical effects the most sensitive indicator(s) of an adverse effect from non clinical toxicological studies. includes therapeutic effect / adverse effects observed in clinical use Must be relevant to humans or target animal 12th November 2014 8

Determination of PDE 3) Establishing No-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) highest tested dose at which no adverse ( critical ) effect is observed Lowest NOAEL should be employed for PDE/ADI calculation If no NOAEL established lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) may be used 12th November 2014 9

Determination of PDE 4) Application of adjustment factors Use of several adjustment factors to account for various uncertainties PDE = NOAEL x Weight Adjustment F1 x F2 x F3 x F4 x F5 F1: A factor for extrapolation between species F2: A factor to account for variability between individuals F3: A factor to account for repeat-dose toxicity studies of short duration F4: A factor that may be applied for cases of severe toxicity, e.g. nongenotoxic carcinogenicity, neurotoxicity or teratogenicity F5: A variable factor where LOAEL is applied instead of NOAEL Additional modifying factors can be used if scientifically justified 12th November 2014 10

Determination of PDE 5) Selection of PDE several critical effects can result in more than one PDE Decision of most appropriate PDE should be appropriately justified By default the lowest PDE value will be used 6) Alternative approaches Other approaches to determine a health based exposure limit could be considered acceptable if adequately and scientifically justified ISPE Risk-MaPP approach 12th November 2014 11

Specific considerations Active substances with a genotoxic potential If no threshold has been established then any exposure presents a risk Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) of 1.5 μg/person/day (EMA guidance on limits of genotoxic impurities EMEA/CHMP/QWP/251344/2006) TTC can be applied to products where threshold has not been established If sufficient evidence of a threshold related mechanism applies, then use of PDE approach permitted 12th November 2014 12

Specific considerations Active substances with a high sensitising potential Some actives are highly sensitising No scientifically established threshold for the response in sensitive individuals Dedicated facilities required E.g. β Lactams Classification weight of evidence assessment Frequency of sensitising occurrence in humans Probability of occurrence rate based in animal or other validated tests Severity of reaction 12th November 2014 13

Specific considerations Therapeutic macromolecules & peptides Degrade and denature when exposed to ph extremes and/or heat PDE may not be required Lack of reproductive toxicity data Use of NOAEL from sub-chronic/chronic study in determining PDE Application of an additional adjustment factor (e.g. 10) Application of a read across approach from related compounds to identify potential hazard 12th November 2014 14

Specific consideration Investigational medicinal products categorisation into specific default values categories based on low/high expected pharmacological potency, low/high toxicity, genotoxicity/carcinogenicity similar to the tiered Threshold of Toxicological Concern approaches proposed by Kroes et al. (2004), Munro et al. (2008), and Dolan et al. (2005) duration of the clinical trial will also be important Health-based exposure limits should be calculated with the availability of new data 12th November 2014 15

Reporting of PDE determination strategy Source of data must be of high quality Search and results thereof must be clearly documented Discussion of critical effects and choice of that used for PDE determination Clear rationale as to choice of adjustment factors used in calculating PDE Initial page should provide summary (template provided in the annex of the guideline) 12th November 2014 16

Thank you! 12th November 2014 17