EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EU RYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYD YDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDIC

Similar documents
Smokefree Policies in Europe: Are we there yet?

Men & Health Work. Difference can make a difference Steve Boorman & Ian Banks RSPH Academy 2013

Current levels and recent trends in health inequalities in the EU: Updates from the EU Report

Where do EU Contries set the limit for low risk drinking.

Good Laboratory Practice. EU-Serbia screening meeting Brussels, 19 June 2014

Manuel Cardoso RARHA Executive Coordinator Public Health MD Senior Advisor Deputy General-Director of SICAD - Portugal

2008 EUROBAROMETER SURVEY ON TOBACCO

Cross Border Genetic Testing for Rare Diseases

WCPT COUNTRY PROFILE December 2017 HUNGARY

WCPT COUNTRY PROFILE December 2017 SWEDEN

Extrapolation and potential impact of IPHS deployment in Europe

WCPT COUNTRY PROFILE December 2017 SERBIA

Table Of Content. The European Influenza Surveillance Scheme... 2 Summary... 3 Coordinator, Leader contact and partners Outputs...

Drinking guidelines used in the context of early identification and brief interventions in Europe: overview of RARHA survey results

Transmission, processing and publication of HBS 2015 data

CNAPA Meeting Luxembourg September 2016

The health economic landscape of cancer in Europe

Overview of drug-induced deaths in Europe - What does the data tell us?

Fieldwork: February March 2010 Publication: October 2010

Young people and drugs. Analytical report

Engagement in language assessment / Regions of Europe

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Biology Report. Is there a relationship between Countries' Human Development Index (HDI) level and the incidence of tuberculosis?

Note on the harmonisation of SILC and EHIS questions on health

Overview of European Consumption Databases

Project Meeting Prague

Nutrient profiles for foods bearing claims

LEBANON. WCPT COUNTRY PROFILE December 2018

EUROPEAN CITIZENS DIGITAL HEALTH LITERACY

Homeopathy and Anthroposophic Medicine THEIR PLACE IN EUROPEAN HEALTH CARE

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION IN EUROPE; TRADITIONS, GENERATIONS, CULTURE AND POLICY

PLACEMENT AND TREATMENT OF MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS LEGISLATION AND PRACTICE IN EU-MEMBER STATES

Differences make a Difference

DENMARK. WCPT COUNTRY PROFILE December 2018

Perspectives for information on alcohol use in the EU

Table Of Content. Invasive Bacterial Infections Surveillance in the European Union... 2 Summary... 3 Coordinator, Leader contact and partners...

GERMANY. WCPT COUNTRY PROFILE December 2018

SOITC Press Ad FAQs. Q: When will these Terms and Conditions changes come into effect?

Weekly influenza surveillance overview

Weekly Influenza Surveillance Report. Week 11

A European Union-wide slaughterhouse baseline survey on the prevalence of Salmonella in slaughter pigs

Screening for Cervical Cancer in Europe

European Collaboration on Dementia. Luxembourg, 13 December 2006

Report. Survey conducted by TNS political & social

TEDDY. Teddy Network of Excellence. Annagrazia ALTAVILLA. Ph.D. Sciences Ethics LL.M. Health Law. diterranée

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

We are here for our fellow patients

Real Life, Real PD Survey

Alcohol-related harm in Europe and the WHO policy response

Post-test of the advertising campaign Help

Alcohol Prevention Day

Underage drinking in Europe

Inequalities in health: challenges and opportunities in Europe Dr Zsuzsanna Jakab WHO Regional Director for Europe

Where we stand in EFORT

508 the number of suicide deaths in deaths per 100,000 people was the suicide rate in Suicide deaths in 2013 by gender

Finnish international trade 2017 Figures and diagrams. Finnish Customs Statistics

To provide information on the new standard, a number of EOG members formed a committee to compile information on the following basis:

Finnish international trade 2017 Figures and diagrams. Finnish Customs Statistics

Yersiniosis SURVEILLANCE REPORT. Annual Epidemiological Report for Key facts. Methods. Epidemiology

Alcohol in Europe and Brief Intervention. Dr Lars Møller Programme Manager World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

D7.1 Report summarising results of survey of EU countries to identify volumes and trends in relation to the import and export of stem cells

D7.1 Report summarising results of survey of EU countries to identify volumes and trends in relation to the import and export of stem cells

E. Scafato, C. Gandin, L. Galluzzo, S. Ghirini

Is there a relationship between Countries' Human Development Index (HDI) level and the incidence of tuberculosis?

31 countries (117 registries, 20 national) Increased coverage in countries with regional registries 50% European population Overall >20 million

Louisville '19 Attachment #69

Authors: Jennifer Kates (Kaiser Family Foundation), Eric Lief (The Stimson Center), Carlos Avila (UNAIDS).

Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases: ischaemic heart disease and stroke

The cancer burden in the European Union and the European Region: the current situation and a way forward

New trends in harm reduction in Europe: progress made challenges ahead

Trichinellosis SURVEILLANCE REPORT. Annual Epidemiological Report for Key facts. Methods

Risk perception and food safety: where do European consumers stand today?

European status report on alcohol and health Leadership, awareness and commitment

Open Access & research metrics Establishing reliable baselines for science policy

Clinical Evidence in the Daily Work of an Anthroposophic Hospital Dr. med. Harald Matthes, Medical Director, Havelhöhe Hospital in Berlin

UK bowel cancer care outcomes: A comparison with Europe

Palliative nursing care of children and young people across Europe

A report on the epidemiology of selected vaccine-preventable diseases in the European Region 30% 20% 10%

Behavioural indicators in men who have sex with men

The Risk of Alcohol in Europe. Bridging the Gap June 2004

The Identification of Food Safety Priorities using the Delphi Technique

IOSH No Time to Lose campaign: working together to tackle asbestos-related cancer #NTTLasbestos. Jonathan Hughes IOSH Vice President

Financing the Response to HIV/AIDS in Low and Middle Income Countries: Funding for HIV/AIDS from the G7 and the European Commission

Public administration reforms and public sector performance in Central and Eastern Europe EU member states: in EU perspective

Amoxicillin 40 mg Clavulanic acid 10 mg. Clavulanic acid 10 mg. Clavulanic acid 10 mg. Clavulanic acid 10 mg

La Réanimation en Europe

World Connections Committee (WCC) Report

PARALLELISM AND THE LEGITIMACY GAP 1. Appendix A. Country Information

Outcome of proficiency test on EIA serology

GLP in the European Union Ecolabel detergents, GLP and accreditation

REVIEW OF THE ANALYSIS RELATED TO RABIES DIAGNOSIS AND FOLLOW-UP OF ORAL VACCINATION PERFORMED IN NRLS IN 2015

United Kingdom Veterinary Medicines Directorate Woodham Lane New Haw Addlestone Surrey KT15 3LS DECENTRALISED PROCEDURE

Summary of Results for Laypersons

Transcription:

EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDIC EURYDICE IN BRF EURYDICE October 2005 EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE E EURYDICE HOW BOYS AND GIRLS IN EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE E EUROPE ARE NDING THEIR The first two issues of Eurydice in Brief EURYDICE WAY WH EURYDICE INFORMION EURYDICE AND EU each contained a summary of a full study already published by Eurydice. COMMUNICION TECHLOGY? EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EUR The present issue sets out some new and original information that has not Virtually all students aged 15 (99.31 ) say that they have already used a previously appeared. EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EUR computer. The majority (81 ) say that they have a computer at home. In 2004, Eurydice produced a subjectbased report bringing together over to play games, to look for information on the Internet and to communicate Over 50 say they regularly use a computer to perform three main activities: EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURY 30 indicators on information and via e-mail or chat-rooms. communication technology EURYDICE in schools. say EURYDICE that they learn on their own or EURYDICE with friends, while girls do so EURYD at The main sources for the report were school or with their family. the Eurydice National Units and EURYDICE While EURYDICE boys are more attracted to ICT EURYDICE and use it more freely, girls learn EURYD to Eurostat, as well as the PA 2000 use computers mainly at school, which doubtless redresses the balance in (Programme for International Student their favour. Assessment) and EURYDICE PIRLS international EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDI surveys. Since the appearance of the report, the results EURYDICE of PA 2003 have EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDIC Developing the skills of young students by expanding school computer facilities and been made public. We felt it would incorporating ICT (information and communication technology) into the curriculum be instructive to analyse some of EURYDICE EURYDICE is one of the current priorities of EURYDICE national policies. This is a consequence EURYDICE of the these data, in particular to compare breakthrough of ICT both at the workplace and in the home. the situation of 15-year-old boys and girls confronted EURYDICE with ICT. Around ten EURYDICE Furthermore, differences between EURYDICE boys and girls in enrolment and EURYDICE qualification rates in mathematical, scientific and technological subjects are a cause for concern at the indicators and Figures on this topic are European Commission. Under these circumstances, it is helpful to analyse by sex the accordingly set out here. EURYDICE EURYDICE reactions of young people in EURYDICE Europe facing up to this new environment, EURYDICE and the ways E in which they become fully conversant with the special technologies comprising ICT. If you wish to let us have any comments or observations, EURYDICE please do not hesitate EURYDICE The replies of young students EURYDICE aged 15 to the PA 2003 survey EURYDICE questionnaire provide an E to e-mail us at: opportunity to analyse the attitudes of boys and girls confronted with ICT. Differences comments@eurydice.org. between them are apparent in the frequency with which they use ICT, the context EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EU in which they learn to do so, the types of activity carried out and self-assessment by We hope you find this third bulletin of students of their own abilities. However, it should be borne in mind that the information EURYDICE interest. EURYDICE here corresponds to EURYDICE data as reported, and that the real EURYDICE situation of young 15-year-olds EUR may differ significantly from what they say about it. Patricia Wastiau-Schlüter EURYDICE EURYDICE The total sample EURYDICE consists of 91 091 students from all EURYDICE countries that took part in PA Head of the Eurydice European Unit EUR except Spain, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom (England, Avenue Louise 240 Wales and Northern Ireland) and Norway, which all decided not to circulate the optional URYDICE B-1050 Brussels EURYDICE questionnaire EURYDICE on ICT. Annexes to the present document, EURYDICE including the calculation of EURY standard errors, may be consulted in its electronic version on the Eurydice website: www.eurydice.org. Details concerning the PA survey are contained in the general RYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYD introduction and glossary of the general report Key Data on Education in Europe 2005 which is also available on the Eurydice website. RYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYD YDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDICE EURYDIC www.eurydice.org Editor: Patricia Wastiau-Schlüter

2 Almost all young people aged 15 have already used a computer. But boys have done so for longer and more frequently than girls Considered as a whole, virtually all students aged 15 (99.31 ) say that they have already used a computer, whether at home, school, or in another setting. The percentages are slightly lower in Slovakia (around 96 ) and Greece (98 ). In all countries, differences between girls and boys in this respect are insignificant. For a great many students, the use of a computer is nothing new. While a minority (9 ) say they have used one for less than a year, a third have done so for over five years. The proportions of students who report using computers for less than a year are higher (around 20 ) in Greece and Latvia, as well as in Slovakia (a little under 30 ). By contrast, in the Nordic countries, the majority of students have used them for over five years. In general, boys report that they have done so for longer than girls. In all cases, this difference is statistically significant except in Ireland. The home computer is used almost every day by half of the young people (49.5 ), to whom may be added the 25 who say they use it a few times each week. Only 13 of young people never use a computer at home, a proportion somewhat lower than the proportion of families without a computer, which stands at some 20 (see Figure 8 for further details). While 60 of boys claim to use one virtually every day, this applies solely to 37 of girls. Figure 1: Proportions of young people aged 15 who say they have used computers for over 5 years, by sex and by country, 2002/03 9 19 24 32 30 41 31 44 19 39 30 32 16 27 9 15 UK - ENG/WLS/NIR 25 42 33 39 24 35 17 24 26 38 12 23 43 62 42 59 49 65 45 50 44 55 28 52 Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. Figure 2: Proportions of young people aged 15 who say they use the computer at home at least a few times each week, by sex and by country, 2002/03 UK - ENG/WLS/NIR 73 80 75 80 87 91 59 80 77 92 75 90 45 68 58 65 70 83 40 58 58 75 79 84 52 66 73 83 54 74 69 86 84 94 78 84 83 94 84 93 Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. Figure 3: Proportions of young people aged 15 who say they use a computer at school at least a few times each week, by sex and by country, 2002/03 UK - ENG/WLS/NIR 19 19 36 28 31 33 43 39 21 25 27 22 41 49 49 52 32 39 58 48 44 45 30 39 43 41 25 47 41 56 34 47 61 75 71 70 41 71 79 82 Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. NB: The shown in the Figures indicates the countries that took part in PA and decided not to circulate the optional questionnaire on ICT.

3 When the two reply options almost every day and a few times each week are bracketed together, the difference is smaller with 80 of boys and 68 of girls. This finding is the same for all countries, although the proportions vary from one to the next. The use of computers at school is a little less frequent: 45 of students say they use them at least a few times each week and 13 that they never do so. In Denmark, Hungary and the United Kingdom (Scotland), the majority of students use school computers at least a few times each week. In 10 countries, the girl/boy differences are insignificant. More frequent use of computers at school by boys is apparent in all the Nordic countries, Portugal and Liechtenstein. In Austria, the opposite trend is observed. The most popular activities are games and looking up information, while the least frequent are programming and mathematical calculation The main activities for which young 15-year-olds use computers are games, Internet access to look up information, and electronic communication via e-mail or chat rooms. Over 50 of students say they perform these three activities a few times each week if not almost every day. Next come the use of software and other Internet applications. Finally, the complex activities of programming and mathematical calculation are far less frequent. No difference between boys and girls as regards communication and word processing but significant differences in the case of games and programming Figure 4: Proportions of young 15-year-olds who use computers for a series of 12 activities, by frequency of use, 2002/03 Games, looking up information, communication Playing games 55 31 Use of the Internet to look up information 51 37 Use of electronic communication (e-mail, chat rooms) 50 27 23 Use of word processing software 50 38 Use of the Internet to download music 45 25 Use of the Internet to download software (games, etc.) 37 29 34 Use of the computer to help with learning school material 31 42 27 Software and the Internet Use of drawing, painting or graphics programmes 31 45 Use of the Internet to collaborate (with a group or team) 28 38 34 Programming and mathematical calculation Programming 25 Use of spreadsheets 24 33 44 Use of educational software (mathematics) 16 38 14 12 12 30 23 43 32 47 At least a few times each week Less than once a week Never Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. The data for all students from all countries combined belie a certain number of differences. In general, boys use computers more often than girls to play games, but also to look up information (these differences are significant in all cases except the German-speaking Community of Belgium, Hungary, Austria and Liechtenstein). As regards use of the computer for communication, however, differences between girls and boys are less clear-cut. The same observation is valid for the use of word processing (at least once a month). The use of spreadsheets is slightly more popular among boys although this does not apply to all countries without exception. Finally, programming activities are far more frequent among boys than girls. Besides the results shown in the Figure, use of the Internet for downloading music or software is far more frequent among boys in all countries. Similarly, boys more often use graphics programmes or the Internet to collaborate with a group, although not in all countries

4 Figure 5: Proportions of young people aged 15 who say they use a computer for six activities at least once a week/month, by sex and by country, 2002/03 playing games 19 57 24 67 34 67 27 68 32 81 25 69 48 70 33 56 39 68 29 67 43 74 20 64 35 71 40 76 34 62 29 73 31 78 40 75 28 75 26 66 At least a few times each WEEK for: looking up information 41 50 49 54 60 67 45 53 57 74 41 55 34 52 33 39 45 57 27 43 41 39 61 61 35 48 50 62 26 34 31 47 53 68 61 68 65 77 60 70 communicating via e-mail or chat rooms 33 32 49 53 57 55 76 77 42 45 59 62 45 52 28 41 35 41 35 41 50 43 59 55 40 44 46 55 22 27 62 54 72 73 68 68 69 70 78 70 At least once a MONTH for: word processing spreadsheets programming activities 64 58 80 71 83 79 70 72 89 91 70 72 64 66 67 53 70 73 45 62 77 75 89 78 62 70 64 74 57 62 66 67 81 80 93 86 81 81 78 88 27 36 32 44 35 44 41 52 31 51 31 43 38 51 33 31 38 49 31 47 52 55 51 52 48 61 40 53 30 45 13 28 19 31 54 53 28 45 39 68 22 26 21 40 30 44 32 50 22 43 20 48 23 46 35 53 34 50 16 37 21 36 28 51 30 55 42 59 19 37 12 35 18 45 40 53 31 48 24 56 Source: OC, base de données PA 2003.

5 without exception. Finally, in the case of activities such as use of the computer to help with learning school material or the use of educational software, no general trend is apparent across countries, probably because these activities are mainly carried out at school (see Key Data on Information and Communication Technology in Schools in Europe, 2004), with variations between countries but the same frequency for boys and girls. say that they learn on their own or with friends, while girls do so at school or with their family Overall, one young person in every three states that (s)he has learnt to use a computer unaided. The remainder say that they have above all learnt to do so at school, or with friends or their family. say that they have mainly learnt how to use computers with friends or on their own, whereas girls report that they have mainly done so at school or with their family. The same observation applies to use of the Internet although the Figure 6: Proportions of young people aged 15 in terms of the person or place they identify as having been most instrumental in teaching them to use computers or the Internet, by sex, 2002/03 50 50 40 30 20 10 0 50 50 40 30 20 10 36 20 Use of computer 11 21 25 15 25 19 19 20 21 13 25 30 41 School Family Friends Alone Use of the Internet 44 3 4 Other 4 5 40 30 20 10 0 40 30 20 10 differences are less marked. 0 School Family Friends Alone Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. Other 0 This trend is apparent in all countries, which means that neither the culture nor the level of school computerisation appear to influence replies. In some countries, the difference between girls and boys is a little less marked in the case of one or other component. Thus in Ireland, Poland and Portugal, for example, differences between the proportions of girls and boys who say that they have mainly learnt to use computers at school are slightly less marked, although they remain significant. Figure 7: Proportions of young people aged 15 in terms of the person or place they identify as having been most instrumental in teaching them to use computers, by sex and by country, 2002/03 0 20 40 60 80 17 9 21 10 19 9 46 18 25 7 18 8 53 32 30 22 33 18 50 31 66 34 53 26 58 40 17 13 33 15 30 13 7 2 45 28 33 12 40 19 0 20 40 60 80 At school With friends With the family Alone Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. 0 20 40 60 16 22 10 22 16 18 10 22 17 30 11 22 8 18 7 14 13 19 13 24 9 26 9 20 8 15 23 27 19 35 16 28 21 29 5 11 13 20 16 12 0 20 40 60 0 20 40 60 39 29 30 18 27 17 22 13 30 16 36 19 11 7 27 21 25 18 17 10 16 13 16 12 11 8 23 15 31 17 31 13 34 15 25 21 21 13 19 22 0 20 40 60 0 20 40 60 80 25 37 38 46 37 54 19 44 26 46 30 47 16 35 32 41 27 41 13 28 7 21 20 39 22 35 23 35 14 31 22 44 35 53 25 38 32 54 21 46 0 20 40 60 80

6 In other countries, the difference between girls and boys is very great in the case of certain components. In the Czech Republic, Germany and the Nordic countries, two to three times as many girls as boys say that they have mainly learnt to use computers at school. In the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia, two to three times as many boys as girls say that they have learnt on their own. Beyond these girl/boy differences, variations may be observed between countries. The proportions of students who have mainly learnt to use computers at school are higher than the European average in Greece, Latvia, Hungary, Austria and Poland. They are far lower in Sweden. The proportions of students who have mainly learnt to use a computer with their families are far higher than average in Belgium (the French Community). Variations attributable to levels of computerisation at home and at school Data on the learning context are partly attributable to the levels of computerisation at home and school in the different countries. In all, the majority of students (81 ) say they have a computer at home that they can use for school work, while 60 say they have an Internet connection at home. However, the percentages are far lower in Greece (53 and 36 respectively), Latvia (44 and 16 ), Hungary (67 and 26 ) and Poland (60 and 34 ), which explains why the proportion of students in these countries who say their learn with their families is lower. By contrast, while the level of school computerisation is not as great in three of these countries (Greece, Latvia and Poland), it is sufficient to provide for learning activity, as Figures 7 and 10 indicate. Figure 8: Proportions of students aged 15 who say they have a home computer and Internet connection, by sex and by country, 2002/03 79 80 86 84 93 93 73 80 92 94 90 92 47 59 77 81 79 79 81 79 76 80 39 49 89 91 63 72 96 96 93 93 55 65 73 77 53 61 86 90 94 96 UK - ENG/WLS/NIR 91 92 90 89 96 98 93 96 93 94 Computer Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. Internet connexion 14 19 15 20 24 28 UK - ENG/WLS/NIR 61 63 68 69 84 85 45 53 82 84 71 76 27 44 49 51 53 59 64 68 59 66 30 39 44 51 69 70 74 77 89 89 73 80 88 91 81 81 80 83 91 94 78 84 87 88 BE fr Average number of students per computer in schools attended by students aged 15 BE de BE nl UK-ENG UK- WLS/NIR SCT 16 7 6 13 7 17 22 14 (:) 8 13 21 7 8 8 7 22 16 36 7 8 (:) 4 6 4 7 Average proportions of computers connected to the Internet in schools attended by students aged 15 BE fr BE de BE nl UK-ENG UK- WLS/NIR SCT 65 72 80 77 88 71 69 79 (:) 67 71 61 96 79 85 87 83 60 51 92 92 (:) 91 96 97 81

7 The majority of students say they are capable of performing a set of simple activities Questioned about their ability to carry out certain activities (23 in all (¹)), students generally say they are very familiar with how to play computer games. It may be assumed that students are also thoroughly proficient in other tasks, such as opening Figure 9: Breakdown by sex of young people aged 15 in accordance with how they assessed their own computer skills, 2002/03 a file, deleting a document or 20 34 36 10 43 31 20 6 file, saving a document or file, Advanced applications scrolling a document up and 38 30 19 12 Spreadsheets and 53 27 13 7 down a screen, drawing pictures PowerPoint presentations 45 31 17 7 with a mouse or printing a file or Communication 62 24 10 5 55 27 15 3 83 10 5 2 document (all shown in Figure 9 Internet (downloading) under the heading using a file), 71 18 8 2 84 10 4 2 File management since the great majority (girls and 80 11 6 2 76 15 7 2 boys) report that they perform Internet/e-mail (simple) 87 9 3 1 89 7 3 1 them very well. Using a file 88 9 2 1 93 5 1 1 Activities such as consulting the Playing games Internet or writing or sending e-mails, which are not very Very well With help Cannot do it Don t know what this means complex, are performed by over Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. 80 of young people and the differences between boys and girls are not very great. (¹) The question How well can you do each of these tasks on a computer? was asked for a list of 23 tasks. These have been grouped together for illustrative purposes. claim to be more competent when performing complex activities Differences between girls and boys become more clear-cut in the case of complex activities grouped together under the heading file management. Creating or editing a document, moving files from one place to another on a computer, or copying a file from a floppy disk are tasks that three quarters of students are able to perform, but more boys than girls report that they do them very well. Tasks such as copying or downloading files from the Internet and downloading music are proficiently executed by a smaller percentage of students, the majority of them boys. A significant proportion of girls say that they can perform these activities with help. Next come tasks such as attaching a file to an e-mail message or using a database to produce a list of addresses, which have been grouped in the Figure under the heading communication, for which the differences between girls and boys are more marked. Activities such as using a spreadsheet to plot a graph or creating a presentation (for example, using PowerPoint) are familiar to less than half of the students, with a greater degree of facility among boys. Finally, students appear far less experienced in advanced applications such as using software to find and get rid of computer viruses, constructing a web page, using a multimedia programme or creating a programme (in Logo, Pascal or Basic). Almost half of the girls say that they are incapable of performing these operations or even totally unfamiliar with them.

8 Figure 10: Proportion of young people aged 15, by sex and by country, who say they perform four particular activities very satisfactorily, 2002/03 Downloading a file 63 77 78 84 79 89 64 83 50 89 69 87 41 64 50 64 52 70 31 62 38 63 87 86 59 74 41 68 33 58 44 90 75 93 69 86 76 93 89 93 Attaching a file to an e-mail message 26 46 31 40 33 50 24 44 18 35 26 44 46 62 60 70 75 83 51 70 52 77 51 73 65 70 40 61 43 61 44 72 67 81 67 73 69 87 79 86 Using PowerPoint 44 54 32 44 40 53 22 44 36 61 26 43 30 46 41 40 43 52 20 37 22 31 13 28 65 67 42 58 52 63 28 56 44 56 51 59 45 65 63 81 0 20 40 60 80 Constructing a web page 19 35 24 37 24 38 23 40 25 50 21 39 14 28 15 22 13 26 18 31 9 18 22 40 28 45 14 28 21 24 13 41 15 37 27 44 26 57 23 59 0 20 40 60 80 Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. In the case of four of these activities, the trend is general for all countries. However, Austria and Ireland are noteworthy for the fact that girls and boys perform any one of them to the same extent. Summary Whatever the country or level of school computerisation, the attitudes of girls and boys vis-à-vis the use of ICT seem to differ in the same way: boys are more attracted to ICT and use it more freely. They say they use computers more frequently (except in the case of communication and word processing activities). They also more often claim that they can perform complex operations and that they have learnt on their own or with friends. It would appear that the education system to some extent redresses the balance in favour of girls, a greater proportion of whom say they learnt to use computers mainly at school and that they perform activities included in the subjects taught there (see Key Data on ICT, Eurydice, 2004) just as well as boys. This bulletin, together with its annexes, may be consulted on the Eurydice website at: www.eurydice.org. This publication is financed by the European Commission Directorate-General for Education and Culture.

ANNEX The shown in the figures indicates countries that took part in PA and decided not to circulate the optional questionnaire on TIC. Figure1. Proportions of young people aged 15 who say they have used computers for over 5 years, by sex and by country. School year 2002/03. BE BE BE UK-ENG/ UKfr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 24.3 29.9 30.7 19.4 42.9 25.1 9.2 29.9 16.2 8.9 32.7 24.2 17.2 25.6 11.8 42.2 48.9 45.1 44.0 27.6 se 1.44 2.17 1.20 0.90 1.22 1.07 0.94 1.57 0.65 0.80 1.01 0.74 1.20 1.37 0.71 1.13 1.43 1.71 1.20 4.03 32.1 40.9 44.5 38.7 62.0 41.8 19.0 32.2 26.8 15.0 38.6 34.9 24.2 38.5 23.1 59.0 65.4 50.5 54.7 51.6 se 1.74 2.81 1.09 1.21 1.20 1.18 1.39 1.28 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.19 1.15 1.17 0.98 1.03 1.15 1.60 1.19 3.94 Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. se : standard error Figure2. Proportions of young people aged 15 who say they use the computer at home at least a few times each week, by sex and by country. School year 2002/03. BE BE BE UK-ENG/ UKfr de nl WLS/NIR SCT Nearly 42.7 every day 41.9 62.5 27.8 44.4 43.7 22.2 20.3 33.8 22.6 28.0 45.8 36.1 41.4 25.1 40.6 55.4 45.2 52.6 51.1 se 2.15 2.69 1.14 1.03 1.35 1.13 0.95 1.26 0.99 1.25 1.22 1.53 1.13 1.34 1.09 1.00 1.06 1.60 1.29 4.02 Few times 29.8 33.4 24.5 31.7 32.5 31.1 23.0 37.3 36.1 16.9 30.1 33.3 15.7 31.3 29.4 28.7 28.5 32.4 30.9 33.3 a week se 1.53 2.38 0.96 1.07 1.18 1.05 1.08 1.18 1.05 1.23 1.26 1.08 0.91 1.02 1.08 0.92 1.01 1.31 1.18 3.79 Nearly 56.1 59.5 71.6 60.2 74.1 71.6 48.0 31.2 59.0 45.1 52.8 57.3 55.2 62.8 55.1 69.4 79.3 58.9 81.4 73.2 every day se 1.69 2.55 1.25 1.25 1.09 1.01 1.29 1.20 1.18 1.85 1.20 1.79 1.32 1.20 1.38 0.88 0.97 1.58 1.00 3.80 Few times 24.0 20.6 19.2 20.0 17.6 18.3 20.3 34.1 23.7 13.1 21.9 26.5 11.0 19.9 18.9 16.8 14.9 24.7 13.0 20.1 a week se 1.41 2.03 0.98 0.79 0.89 0.97 1.08 1.11 0.79 0.96 0.91 1.23 0.69 0.95 1.05 0.85 0.86 1.07 0.78 2.98 Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. se : standard error Figure3. Proportions of young people aged 15 who say they use a computer at school at least a few times each week, by sex and by country. School year 2002/03. BE BE BE UK-ENG/ UKfr de nl WLS/NIR SCT Nearly every day 2.2 6.4 1.4 3.9 19.1 0.7 3.3 2.3 3.9 2.7 5.5 12.8 1.5 3.1 3.5 2.0 11.4 22.6 3.6 5.7 se 0.60 1.12 0.30 0.64 1.37 0.19 0.59 0.48 0.69 0.62 0.83 1.52 0.32 0.52 0.52 0.40 0.96 2.39 0.50 1.81 Few times 17.0 29.9 29.8 39.0 41.9 20.7 37.9 24.5 45.3 28.8 73.2 45.1 42.0 26.7 39.4 22.9 29.9 48.2 30.4 35.1 a week se 1.80 2.00 1.75 2.12 1.38 1.44 2.29 1.94 2.44 2.43 1.47 1.81 1.97 1.65 1.84 1.27 1.25 1.99 1.11 3.62 Nearly every day 2.6 4.8 1.4 5.4 26.1 2.0 5.7 2.1 3.4 4.6 7.3 9.0 3.1 7.4 4.5 5.8 19.0 22.7 6.5 13.5 se 0.62 1.28 0.27 0.61 1.40 0.35 0.76 0.42 0.45 1.12 1.07 1.12 0.45 0.73 0.77 0.77 1.28 1.52 0.66 2.22 Few times 16.2 22.9 31.3 33.5 48.8 23.1 43.4 19.6 48.7 34.5 74.5 38.9 41.8 31.6 36.9 41.6 36.5 47.6 40.5 57.5 a week se 1.44 1.97 1.65 1.68 1.34 1.55 2.63 1.32 2.10 2.00 1.57 1.76 1.97 1.47 1.55 1.56 1.25 1.65 1.19 3.53 Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. se : standard error 1

and girls aged confronted with the ICT in the European countries Figure 4. Proportions of young 15-year-olds who use computers for a series of 12 activities, by frequency of use School year 2002/03. A se B se C se D se Nearly every day 26.6 0.28 18.9 0.27 26.9 0.29 14.2 0.21 Few times a week 27.8 0.26 32.4 0.32 23.2 0.27 36.0 0.31 Between once a week and once a month 16.7 0.22 24.2 0.32 15.7 0.22 25.7 0.27 Less than once a month 14.5 0.20 12.8 0.21 11.7 0.23 12.5 0.22 Never 14.4 0.23 11.7 0.27 22.5 0.31 11.5 0.23 E se F se G se H se Nearly every day 24.6 0.27 17.4 0.22 8.3 0.22 10.1 0.20 Few times a week 20.7 0.28 19.4 0.25 22.4 0.25 21.2 0.25 Between once a week and once a month 14.0 0.23 15.7 0.23 22.6 0.23 22.6 0.26 Less than once a month 11.1 0.17 13.7 0.19 19.5 0.25 22.8 0.27 Never 29.5 0.28 33.9 0.33 27.2 0.31 23.3 0.34 I se J se K se L se Nearly every day 10.2 0.18 10.0 0.19 6.1 0.16 4.1 0.17 Few times a week 17.9 0.28 14.7 0.21 18.1 0.27 11.5 0.22 Between once a week and once a month 19.7 0.30 15.8 0.24 21.9 0.25 16.3 0.24 Less than once a month 18.3 0.22 16.9 0.24 22.1 0.24 21.3 0.28 Never 33.9 0.36 42.6 0.36 31.8 0.35 46.7 0.38 A Playing games G Use of the computer to help with learning school material B Use of the Internet to look up information H Use of drawing, painting or graphics programmes C Use of electronic communication (e-mail, chat rooms) I Use of the Internet to collaborate (with a group or team) D Use of word processing software J Programming E Use of the Internet to download music K Use of spreadsheets F Use of the Internet to download software (games, etc.) L Use of educational software (mathematics) se standard error Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. 2

Annexes Figure 5. Proportions of young people aged 15 who say they use a computer for six activities at least once a week/month, by sex and by country. School year 2002/03. A least a few times each week for : Playing games fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 19.3 23.7 34.0 26.7 31.7 24.8 47.7 33.2 39.4 28.6 42.8 19.7 34.6 40.1 34.5 29.4 31.2 39.9 28.0 26.1 se 0.93 2.09 1.00 1.16 1.00 1.08 1.30 1.21 1.16 1.35 1.22 1.01 0.95 1.21 1.27 1.06 1.39 1.59 1.13 3.44 57.4 67.1 67.5 68.3 80.9 68.7 69.6 56.0 68.4 66.7 74.3 63.9 70.8 76.1 62.1 73.5 78.3 75.0 74.7 65.8 se 1.78 2.39 1.01 1.38 0.90 1.08 1.12 1.16 0.89 1.44 1.03 1.29 1.05 0.99 1.20 0.93 0.84 1.28 1.01 3.69 Looking up information fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 40.7 48.9 59.9 45.2 57.4 40.7 34.5 33.2 44.8 27.0 41.3 61.0 35.4 50.2 26.0 30.7 52.7 60.7 65.3 59.9 se 1.67 2.37 1.32 1.64 1.23 0.99 1.44 1.77 1.20 1.37 1.54 1.31 1.47 1.57 1.41 0.93 1.21 1.75 1.18 4.26 50.1 54.4 67.3 53.2 73.6 55.0 51.6 39.5 57.0 42.9 39.4 60.8 48.2 61.5 34.0 47.2 68.4 68.1 77.1 70.0 se 1.60 2.58 1.18 1.52 0.97 1.00 1.30 1.21 1.15 1.65 1.30 1.37 1.40 1.21 1.37 0.99 1.29 1.37 1.11 3.47 Communicating via e-mails or chat-rooms fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 49.2 57.2 75.9 42.2 58.6 45.1 27.6 32.6 35.3 34.6 49.6 59.1 39.9 46.1 22.2 62.0 72.0 68.3 68.6 77.7 se 1.71 2.46 1.05 1.53 1.40 1.15 0.94 1.53 1.15 1.83 1.53 1.14 1.19 1.73 1.14 1.21 1.05 1.83 1.10 3.83 53.0 54.8 77.1 44.8 61.5 52.4 41.0 32.2 40.7 40.7 42.7 54.6 44.2 55.4 26.6 53.8 72.6 67.6 70.4 69.8 se 1.74 2.42 1.01 1.43 1.33 1.12 1.13 1.21 1.11 1.49 1.36 1.27 1.42 1.30 1.16 1.16 1.47 1.66 1.16 3.65 At least once a month for : Word processing fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 63.6 79.9 82.7 69.6 89.3 69.8 63.6 67.4 70.1 45.2 77.0 89.1 61.6 64.2 57.1 66.3 81.0 92.7 81.0 78.2 se 2.04 1.99 1.29 1.69 0.83 1.18 1.29 1.50 1.12 1.62 1.36 0.89 1.30 1.35 1.64 1.26 1.04 0.80 1.07 3.43 57.9 70.9 79.2 71.8 90.7 71.8 66.4 53.3 73.0 61.6 75.0 78.1 69.8 74.1 61.5 67.0 79.8 85.7 81.2 87.6 se 1.64 2.23 1.05 1.39 0.73 1.03 1.30 1.54 1.03 1.77 1.02 1.35 1.31 1.14 1.55 1.09 0.89 1.05 1.21 2.58 Spreadsheets fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 27.2 31.8 35.0 41.4 30.6 31.0 38.3 33.0 38.0 31.0 52.0 50.6 48.1 40.3 30.2 13.2 18.7 54.5 27.6 38.9 se 1.36 2.43 1.52 1.61 1.18 1.16 1.37 1.25 1.33 2.11 1.58 1.72 1.50 1.37 1.10 0.90 0.94 1.83 0.88 4.01 36.2 44.1 44.1 51.8 50.7 43.2 50.9 31.1 49.4 46.6 55.2 52.1 60.6 53.5 44.6 28.4 30.8 52.7 44.7 67.7 se 1.41 2.33 1.33 1.27 1.33 1.11 1.19 1.25 1.07 1.69 1.43 1.42 1.25 1.30 1.09 1.11 1.01 1.88 1.18 3.94 Programming activities fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 20.8 29.9 32.3 22.2 19.8 23.0 35.4 22.2 34.3 16.1 21.1 28.0 30.3 42.2 19.4 11.7 18.3 39.9 30.9 23.5 se 1.43 2.59 1.03 0.98 0.83 0.96 1.00 1.14 1.03 0.92 1.06 1.19 1.15 1.16 0.98 0.65 0.75 1.98 1.17 3.36 39.5 44.5 49.5 42.6 47.7 45.6 53.2 26.2 49.9 37.4 35.9 50.7 54.6 58.6 36.7 35.2 45.1 53.4 47.8 56.0 se 1.54 2.89 1.00 1.48 1.31 1.09 1.18 1.07 1.10 1.30 1.19 1.68 1.22 1.26 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.61 1.16 3.11 Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. se : standard error 3

and girls aged confronted with the ICT in the European countries Figure 6. Proportions of young people aged 15 in terms of the person or place they identify as having been most instrumental in teaching them to use computers or the Internet, by sex. School year 2002/03. Computer School Friends Family Alone Others 35.6 11.4 24.6 24.9 3.5 standard error 0.50 0.29 0.42 0.45 0.18 20.3 20.5 15.0 40.6 3.6 standard error 0.38 0.38 0.36 0.48 0.17 Internet School Friends Family Alone Others 24.0 18.0 19.9 28.9 4.2 standard error 0.44 0.35 0.39 0.52 0.19 17.9 19.1 12.6 42.4 4.5 standard error 0.42 0.37 0.34 0.47 0.18 Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. Figure 7. Proportions of young people aged 15 in terms of the person or place they identify as having been most instrumental in teaching them to use computers, by sex and by country. School year 2002/03 At school fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 16.8 20.6 18.5 45.8 25.4 18.2 53.3 30.2 32.6 50.4 65.8 53.1 57.6 17.0 33.1 29.8 6.7 44.6 32.7 40.1 se 2.07 2.75 1.10 1.69 1.16 1.10 1.54 1.66 1.67 2.15 1.43 1.73 1.52 1.41 1.59 1.27 0.54 1.81 1.11 4.60 16.1 10.1 15.7 10.0 16.5 10.8 8.3 7.5 12.6 13.3 8.6 8.9 8.1 23.3 18.6 15.7 21.1 5.0 13.4 16.4 se 1.17 1.83 0.90 0.81 0.95 0.87 0.73 0.80 0.75 1.09 0.72 0.88 0.67 1.21 0.98 0.69 1.10 0.58 1.03 3.55 With friends fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 38.7 29.7 26.6 21.6 30.0 36.4 10.8 27.4 24.6 17.2 15.6 16.2 11.4 22.9 30.9 31.1 34.4 24.7 21.2 18.8 se 2.06 2.21 1.23 0.94 1.28 1.22 0.92 1.39 1.08 1.17 1.01 1.14 0.68 1.27 1.34 1.04 1.37 1.53 1.02 3.88 25.5 38.1 37.5 19.3 26.0 30.3 16.0 32.4 26.8 12.9 7.0 20.0 21.8 22.9 14.3 22.2 35.4 24.8 31.6 21.4 se 1.31 2.77 1.08 1.09 1.26 1.13 1.03 1.35 1.02 0.85 0.57 0.97 1.07 1.34 0.78 0.78 1.20 1.71 1.33 3.80 With the family fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 9.4 10.0 9.0 17.6 6.6 7.6 31.6 21.7 17.9 30.9 34.4 25.5 39.8 12.6 14.7 13.0 2.0 28.4 12.1 19.1 se 0.96 1.85 0.67 0.88 0.52 0.77 1.45 1.34 1.15 1.53 1.22 1.21 1.38 0.98 1.10 0.73 0.32 1.49 0.82 3.55 22.0 22.3 18.2 22.2 29.9 22.2 17.5 14.1 18.7 24.3 26.3 20.3 14.8 26.7 34.6 28.3 29.0 11.3 20.1 11.7 se 1.62 2.24 1.04 0.96 1.21 1.26 1.15 0.91 0.86 1.28 1.01 1.27 0.83 1.37 1.33 1.04 1.13 1.08 1.08 3.20 Alone fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 29.0 17.8 17.2 12.5 15.7 19.0 7.3 20.8 17.9 9.9 12.5 11.8 8.4 15.5 16.5 13.4 14.5 20.6 12.6 22.3 se 1.51 2.23 1.09 0.79 0.91 1.11 0.60 1.22 0.91 0.71 0.85 0.77 0.62 1.16 0.84 0.66 0.85 1.25 0.82 3.90 37.0 45.6 54.1 43.9 45.9 47.4 35.1 41.0 41.1 27.7 21.4 39.1 35.0 35.0 31.1 43.8 52.5 38.2 53.9 46.0 se 1.62 2.82 1.29 1.25 1.31 1.53 1.30 1.09 1.30 1.52 0.98 1.57 1.23 1.38 1.15 1.15 1.19 1.55 1.23 4.72 Source: OECD. PA 2003 database. se : standard error 4

Annexes Figure 8. Proportions of students aged 15 who say they have a home computer and Internet connection, by sex and by country. School year 2002/03. Computer fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 79.0 79.0 86.2 93.3 73.3 92.2 90.2 46.8 77.3 78.7 80.5 76.1 39.5 89.4 63.2 96.2 92.7 55.1 72.6 53.3 85.9 94.1 91.5 90.0 95.8 92.5 se 1.41 1.41 1.49 0.67 1.07 0.72 0.78 1.36 1.18 1.03 1.36 1.15 1.79 0.62 1.47 0.59 0.59 1.41 1.50 1.48 0.73 0.53 0.69 0.95 0.47 2.15 79.7 79.7 83.8 93.0 79.9 94.4 92.1 59.2 80.7 78.5 79.2 80.1 48.8 90.9 71.6 95.6 93.2 65.5 77.1 60.8 89.9 95.8 91.7 88.9 97.7 95.8 se 1.72 1.72 1.70 0.74 1.20 0.51 0.68 1.69 1.04 1.38 1.19 1.33 1.88 0.59 1.31 0.61 0.76 1.31 1.36 1.55 0.62 0.50 0.67 0.87 0.37 1.54 Internet connection fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 61.0 67.5 84.1 44.9 82.3 71.0 27.5 48.5 53.0 64.4 58.9 14.0 74.2 24.1 88.7 68.8 29.7 44.1 14.9 73.5 87.9 80.5 79.5 90.5 78.3 87.2 se 2.13 2.16 0.86 1.02 0.96 1.08 1.47 1.78 1.38 1.80 1.40 1.10 0.82 1.18 1.10 1.45 1.11 1.58 0.68 1.01 0.83 0.98 1.41 0.70 3.04 0.73 62.7 69.4 85.4 53.1 84.5 76.2 43.8 51.1 59.2 68.0 66.1 18.9 76.6 27.7 89.4 70.0 38.7 51.3 19.7 79.9 91.2 80.8 83.2 93.9 84.0 88.0 se 1.96 2.26 1.08 1.33 0.96 1.00 1.69 1.64 1.71 1.38 1.31 1.14 0.98 1.09 0.93 1.13 1.12 1.52 1.02 0.86 0.67 0.88 1.20 0.54 2.75 0.98 Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. se : standard error Figure 9. Breakdown by sex of young people aged 15 in accordance with how they assessed their own computer skills. School year 2002/03. Playing games Using a file Internet/mail (simple) File management Internet (downloading) Communication Spreadsheets and PowerPoint presentations Very well 88.1 86.7 80.3 71.2 54.6 44.7 38.3 19.9 With help 8.8 8.9 11.5 18.5 27.3 31.2 30.2 34.4 Cannot do it 2.4 3.1 6.4 7.9 15.0 16.8 19.5 35.5 Don t know what it means 0.7 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.0 7.3 12.0 10.2 Playing games Using a file Internet/mail (simple) File management Internet (downloading) Communication Spreadsheets and PowerPoint presentations Very well 93.0 88.8 82.7 84.3 76.1 61.7 52.9 43.0 With help 5.0 7.3 10.1 10.0 14.9 23.5 27.1 30.8 Cannot do it 1.3 2.7 5.0 3.9 6.6 10.0 12.7 19.8 Don t know what it means 0.8 1.3 2.2 1.7 2.5 4.7 7.4 6.4 Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. Advanced applications Advanced applications 5

and girls aged confronted with the ICT in the European countries Figure 10. Proportion of young people aged 15, by sex and by country, who say they perform four particular activities very satisfactorily. School year 2002/03. Downloading a file fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 63.3 77.6 79.3 63.6 49.6 69.3 40.8 50.2 51.7 31.3 37.9 87.0 59.3 40.8 33.3 44.2 74.6 69.5 76.1 88.7 se 1.90 2.02 0.86 1.22 1.33 1.05 1.25 1.54 1.34 1.55 1.34 0.94 1.66 1.81 1.35 1.11 1.21 1.25 1.02 2.81 77.0 84.4 88.7 83.3 88.7 86.7 63.5 63.9 70.4 61.6 63.1 86.5 73.7 68.1 58.1 89.6 93.0 85.6 93.1 93.4 se 1.34 2.10 0.77 1.04 0.81 0.78 1.26 1.06 1.11 1.58 1.35 1.04 1.32 1.19 1.51 0.62 0.56 1.12 0.69 2.09 Attaching a file to an e-mail message fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 46.4 60.3 74.8 50.7 51.6 51.3 26.4 31.1 33.4 24.1 25.8 65.2 40.2 43.4 17.7 43.6 67.0 66.6 68.8 79.4 se 1.96 2.08 0.94 1.30 1.49 1.14 1.29 1.44 1.16 1.37 1.19 1.74 1.55 1.70 0.91 1.09 1.16 1.51 0.95 3.26 61.8 70.0 82.9 70.0 76.6 73.4 45.7 40.0 49.8 44.5 43.6 69.8 61.0 61.0 35.4 72.4 81.2 73.2 86.6 86.0 se 1.72 2.49 1.05 1.11 0.98 1.01 1.36 1.32 1.23 2.24 1.48 1.27 1.40 1.35 1.40 0.92 0.85 1.62 0.81 2.64 Using PowerPoint fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 44.3 32.4 39.6 21.6 36.2 26.1 30.1 41.2 43.3 20.4 22.2 64.9 42.4 52.2 13.5 28.2 43.9 51.1 45.5 62.9 se 1.55 2.21 1.48 1.48 1.45 1.34 1.38 2.09 1.37 1.89 1.36 2.05 1.86 1.55 1.32 1.31 1.31 2.09 1.19 3.67 53.5 44.1 52.8 43.9 61.5 43.5 46.0 40.0 51.5 37.0 31.4 66.8 58.2 63.4 28.0 55.8 56.1 58.7 65.5 80.8 se 1.48 2.59 1.37 1.52 1.46 1.55 1.57 1.68 1.16 1.52 1.48 1.66 1.56 1.33 1.48 1.52 1.49 1.65 1.13 2.96 Constructing a web page fr de nl WLS/NIR SCT 19.4 24.4 23.6 22.7 25.4 21.4 13.6 15.1 13.1 18.0 9.3 22.1 27.5 13.5 20.5 13.5 14.8 27.2 25.9 22.7 se 0.97 2.11 1.02 0.86 1.02 1.10 0.80 0.87 0.88 1.24 0.82 1.06 1.48 0.82 1.11 0.69 1.01 1.55 1.13 3.14 35.0 37.4 37.5 40.2 50.4 39.3 28.2 22.4 25.7 31.2 18.5 39.6 45.2 27.6 24.4 40.9 37.3 44.0 57.2 58.9 se 1.30 2.85 1.14 1.28 1.17 1.24 1.10 1.16 1.12 1.52 0.85 1.47 1.58 1.12 1.22 1.21 1.21 1.54 1.12 3.64 Source: OECD, PA 2003 database. se : standard error 6